Why do chemical, pharmaceutical and process companies in Düsseldorf need their own AI security & compliance strategy?
Innovators at these companies trust us
Local challenge: security meets regulation
The chemical, pharmaceutical and process industries in and around Düsseldorf are under intense pressure: strict compliance requirements, sensitive laboratory and production data, and the need to integrate digital assistance systems without risk. Without a clear AI security and data governance strategy, production outages, compliance breaches and reputational risks loom.
Why we have the local expertise
We regularly travel to Düsseldorf and work on-site with customers – we are not represented there by a branch office, but come directly into your organization to provide concrete, pragmatic and operational support. This working method allows us to precisely understand and implement local requirements for security, audit-readiness and regulatory documentation.
Our engagements in North Rhine-Westphalia combine technical engineering with business implementation: we bring effective teams that think and work in the language of plant managers, EHS managers and data protection officers. This produces solutions that are not only secure but also practical in day-to-day operations.
Our references
For industrial clients we have already accompanied security and product development processes: at STIHL we supported projects from customer research to product-market-fit phase – over two years, including training solutions and production support. Such initiatives help us anchor security and compliance requirements in industrial environments.
With Eberspächer we worked on AI-driven solutions for noise reduction in manufacturing processes and delivered analyses that considered both technical robustness and data protection aspects. Additionally, we support consultancy-adjacent projects like FMG in automated document search and analysis, underlining our competence in compliance-driven information processes.
About Reruption
Reruption was founded on the conviction that companies should not react passively to disruption, but actively rethink. Our Co-Preneur approach means: we work like co-founders, take on operational responsibility and deliver not only concepts but functioning, secure products in short timeframes.
For companies in Düsseldorf and North Rhine-Westphalia this means: pragmatic, engineering-driven solutions for AI security & compliance — from Privacy Impact Assessments to secure self-hosting strategies and audit-ready documentation according to ISO/TISAX requirements.
Do you need an audit-ready AI strategy for your plant in Düsseldorf?
We travel to Düsseldorf, work on-site with your teams and create a pragmatic roadmap for TISAX/ISO-compliant AI deployments.
What our Clients say
Hans Dohrmann
CEO at internetstores GmbH 2018-2021
This is the most systematic and transparent go-to-market strategy I have ever seen regarding corporate startups.
Kai Blisch
Director Venture Development at STIHL, 2018-2022
Extremely valuable is Reruption's strong focus on users, their needs, and the critical questioning of requirements. ... and last but not least, the collaboration is a great pleasure.
Marco Pfeiffer
Head of Business Center Digital & Smart Products at Festool, 2022-
Reruption systematically evaluated a new business model with us: we were particularly impressed by the ability to present even complex issues in a comprehensible way.
AI security & compliance for chemical, pharmaceutical and process industries in Düsseldorf: a deep dive
The combination of sensitive laboratory values, complex process data and demanding regulatory frameworks makes AI adoption in the chemical, pharmaceutical and process industries particularly challenging. Düsseldorf as a business location adds further complexity: dense networks of consulting, telecommunications and trading companies that require data-driven interfaces, as well as close ties to energy providers and logistics companies that shape operations.
Companies must not only meet technical requirements but also ensure audit-readiness: traceable data provenance, tamper-proof logging and access mechanisms, and documented decision processes for AI models. Only then do certifications like ISO 27001 or industry-specific requirements such as TISAX become relevant and manageable.
Market analysis and regulatory context
In North Rhine-Westphalia companies are under increasing scrutiny by national regulators and international partners. Pharmaceutical companies are subject to strict requirements for data integrity and traceability of clinical information. Chemical and process plants must additionally ensure that AI systems do not pose a risk to operational safety, environmental protection or product safety.
Regulatory trends are moving toward transparency: requirements for data lineage, audit trails, explainability and documented testing procedures are becoming the norm. This is not an obstacle but an opportunity: firms that introduce structured governance early gain market trust and competitive advantages.
Specific use cases and their security requirements
Laboratory-process documentation: AI can generate automatic protocols, detect deviations and suggest remediation steps. For security this means: strict access rights, encrypted storage, versioning of models and data, and complete audit logs that make changes and model decisions traceable.
Safety copilots: assistance systems in production support employees in safety-critical decisions. Here, real-time safety guarantees, runtime monitoring, fallback mechanisms and certifiable test runs are required to minimize risks. Red-teaming and continuous evaluation are mandatory, not optional.
Knowledge search and secure internal models: internal language models and retrieval systems enable quick access to SOPs, test plans and maintenance instructions. Crucial is data sovereignty: self-hosting, data partitioning and strict model access control prevent data exfiltration and protect intellectual property.
Technical implementation and architectural principles
Core principles of a secure architecture are data minimization, clear separation of environments (development, test, production), and encrypted end-to-end communication. Modules such as Secure Self-Hosting & Data Separation, Model Access Controls & Audit Logging and Data Governance are not optional – they form the backbone of every solution.
Practically, we recommend hybrid architectures: sensitive models and data remain on-premises or in a certified private cloud environment, while less critical components can run in controlled public cloud services. This preserves scalability and cost control without endangering data protection or compliance.
Processes, roles and team requirements
Successful implementations require clear responsibilities: an AI security lead, data stewards for classification and retention, an engineering team for secure infrastructure and a compliance owner for audit-readiness. Interdisciplinary steering groups connect EHS, IT security, data protection and business units.
Training and change management are crucial: employees must know secure usage patterns, for example for Safe Prompting & Output Controls or handling confidential queries in knowledge systems. Regular training and simulated audits increase resilience.
Evaluation, testing and red-teaming
Regular evaluation cycles and red-teaming are necessary to identify vulnerabilities before they can be exploited. Tests should include blackbox and whitebox scenarios: from adversarial prompts to data injection tests and load testing of the model infrastructure.
Audit kits and compliance automation (e.g., ISO/NIST templates) significantly reduce the effort for certifications. We recommend fixed testing intervals, using the results as a basis for decisions on model rollouts and documenting them.
ROI, timelines and typical roadmaps
Investment in AI security pays off through reduced downtime, lower compliance risk and accelerated product development. A typical proof-of-concept (PoC) with us takes a few days to weeks, while full enterprise integration can take 3–9 months — depending on data quality, system complexity and regulatory effort.
Important is a staged approach: fast, technically focused PoCs (e.g., secure internal models for knowledge search) deliver early visible results; parallel governance work lays the foundation for scaled rollouts.
Common pitfalls and how to avoid them
Common mistakes are lack of data classification, insufficient access controls, missing audit logs and unrealistic assumptions about models (e.g., overtrust in open LLMs). These can be avoided through clear data governance, strict role definitions, secure hosting decisions and continuous testing.
Another mistake is separating security teams from product development. We recommend co-preneur teams: security experts work directly with product and operations teams to build practical, secure solutions.
Technology stack and integration
A modern stack for secure AI includes: orchestration (Kubernetes), secrets management, hardware isolation for models, audit logging tools, data lineage solutions and interfaces to existing MES/ERP systems. Integration into existing process control systems requires middleware strategies and often small, robust adapters rather than complete rewrites.
Our modules – such as Privacy Impact Assessments, compliance automation and evaluation & red-teaming of AI systems – are designed to plug into such stacks and be introduced stepwise without jeopardizing ongoing operations.
Ready for an AI security PoC?
Book our AI PoC: working prototype, performance measurements and an actionable production plan in a few weeks.
Key industries in Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf has long been a hub for trade, fashion and services, but the region also has close ties to the chemical industry and pharmaceutical suppliers. Historically trading houses and agencies emerged around the Rhine riverside, while technical and industrial activities grew along logistical axes and in neighboring cities. This mix shapes digital security requirements: rapid time-to-market meets high compliance expectations.
The chemical sector in the Rhine-Ruhr region benefits from short supply chains and a dense network of laboratories, logistics providers and suppliers. For companies this means a high number of data flows between various partners that must be securely orchestrated. AI can accelerate lab processes, automate quality controls and make tacit knowledge accessible — provided data sovereignty and access rights are clearly defined.
The pharma and biotech niche around Düsseldorf benefits from good connections to research institutions and international markets. Clinic-adjacent research, regulatory questions and strict documentation requirements demand traceable AI processes. Here, Privacy Impact Assessments and documented model decisions are not only best practice but often regulatory prerequisites.
The process industry in the region includes numerous medium-sized companies that operate complex manufacturing processes. For them, safety copilots and predictive maintenance offer enormous efficiency gains, while safety requirements must be strictly observed: erroneous recommendations from an assistance system must not lead to dangerous situations.
The fashion and trade clusters in Düsseldorf influence data flows: integrated supply chains and omnichannel processes connect production data with trade and customer data. This requires interfaces that are optimized for both performance and security. Companies introducing intelligent purchasing and quality processes need clear rules for data retention and classification.
Telecommunications and consulting services complement the economic structure: providers like Vodafone and numerous consulting firms drive digitization forward and offer local expertise for secure networks and cloud architectures. For manufacturing companies this creates an advantage: local partners with know-how in secure connectivity, edge computing and encrypted data transmission.
Steel and heavy industry, represented by companies like ThyssenKrupp, show how traditional heavyweights and modern digital processes can be combined. The lesson for chemical and pharma is clear: robust physical processes and digital control must go hand in hand. AI security must consider both — physical safety as well as data integrity.
Overall, Düsseldorf and the wider North Rhine-Westphalia region offer a network of trade, telecom, consulting and industry that provides ideal conditions for the secure use of AI — provided governance, compliance and technical security are implemented consistently from the start.
Do you need an audit-ready AI strategy for your plant in Düsseldorf?
We travel to Düsseldorf, work on-site with your teams and create a pragmatic roadmap for TISAX/ISO-compliant AI deployments.
Key players in Düsseldorf
Henkel has its roots in the region and is a defining player in chemicals and consumer goods. The company stands for global brand management, diverse production processes and strict quality standards. Henkel is a prime example of how large industrial companies must combine digital transformation and compliance: data integrity and auditability are central to manufacturing and product approval.
E.ON plays an important role as an energy supplier for the industrial infrastructure in Düsseldorf and North Rhine-Westphalia. Energy supply, grid integration and flexibility services are essential for production facilities. E.ON’s innovation activities influence how companies can use energy data — under strict security and data protection requirements.
Vodafone is a key player in the telecommunications sector and drives local connectivity, IoT solutions and secure communication. Manufacturing companies benefit from stable, secure networks that are indispensable for distributed AI systems and edge computing. Collaboration with telecom providers is often the basis for robust data transmission in industrial environments.
ThyssenKrupp represents industrial breadth and technological development in the region. The group demonstrates how classical industry merges with digital monitoring, predictive maintenance and automated quality assurance. For chemical and process companies the parallels in the need for secure control and monitoring solutions are evident.
Metro embodies trade and logistics expertise in Düsseldorf. Supply chain optimization, warehouse processes and quality controls are areas where AI already delivers tangible benefits today. However, linking logistics data with production data requires stringent access and retention rules to meet compliance requirements.
Rheinmetall is another example of a large industrial player with high demands on safety and process discipline. Although primarily active in other segments, Rheinmetall provides important impulses to the security culture in the region. Their experience with safety-critical systems and certifications is instructive for adjacent industries.
These local players shape the economic climate in Düsseldorf: they drive innovation, create demand for secure digital solutions and set standards that smaller suppliers and mid-sized companies follow. For providers of AI security & compliance this results in a market with high security awareness but also clear opportunities for pragmatic, certifiable solutions.
Reruption enters this local ecosystem as a pragmatic partner: we understand the requirements of both large and medium-sized companies, bring operational experience and the ability to implement security measures quickly and audit-compliantly.
Ready for an AI security PoC?
Book our AI PoC: working prototype, performance measurements and an actionable production plan in a few weeks.
Frequently Asked Questions
TISAX and ISO 27001 pursue similar goals but differ in focus: ISO 27001 is a generic, internationally recognized information security management system, while TISAX is specifically tailored to the requirements of the automotive and supplier industry, with a strong emphasis on exchange processes and supply chains. For chemical and pharmaceutical companies in Düsseldorf, ISO 27001 is usually the primary basis because it covers broader compliance and risk management.
That does not mean elements from TISAX are irrelevant. Many TISAX requirements — such as detailed demands for access controls, physical security and supplier assessments — are also useful for chemical and pharmaceutical companies, especially when suppliers from the automotive or technology value chain are involved. A hybrid approach, using ISO 27001 as the framework and adapting selected TISAX principles, is often practical.
Technically this means concretely: implement an ISMS according to ISO 27001, complement it with detailed supplier assessments, strict data separation principles and audit logs for sensitive data exchanges. Document decisions so they are traceable in audit scenarios — this simplifies later certifications and partner audits.
Practical takeaways: start with a gap analysis, define data classifications and build modular controls (e.g., Model Access Controls & Audit Logging). This enables ISO 27001 compliance while integrating TISAX-like requirements where business processes demand them.
Secure self-hosting environments begin with the architecture: physical or private cloud infrastructure, strict network segmentation, hardware isolation for models and robust secrets management are essential. Data must be encrypted at rest and in transit, and there should be a clear separation between development, test and production environments.
The next step is governance: implement data classification, retention policies and lineage tracking. Without clear classification you risk sensitive lab and process data ending up in less secure areas. Data stewards should take responsibility for class formation and lifecycle management.
Operationally: implement Model Access Controls & Audit Logging. Every access to models and data must be traceable. Audit logs should be tamper-proof and easily analyzable so auditors can quickly understand who used which data and why. You also need incident response plans for security incidents and mechanisms to rapidly isolate compromised components.
Finally: test regularly with red-teaming and evaluation. Simulate data leaks, adversarial prompts and operational disruptions. Only through continuous testing do you reach maturity. Practically this means: modular design, clear responsibilities and regular, documented tests are the foundation for secure self-hosting in the chemical industry.
Traceability starts with design decisions: use models and pipelines that offer explainability or at least can document decision paths. For regulated environments detailed records of data provenance, feature engineering, model versions, training data and evaluation metrics are required. Every change to a model must be versioned and documented.
Technical measures include audit logs, data lineage and mechanisms to ensure data integrity (checksums, signatures). Additionally, standardized reporting formats are useful to give auditors quick insights. Automated compliance automation tools help generate regular reports and meet ISO or GMP audit requirements.
Process-wise, approval paths, change management and review boards are necessary. Every model change should go through a gate that combines technical tests, security checks and compliance assessments. In critical cases a manual sign-off must occur before models go into production.
Practical recommendations: develop an audit playbook with typical audit paths, conduct regular internal audits and use tools for automated documentation. This way you avoid surprises in external audits and build trust with regulators and partners.
Data governance is the backbone of any secure knowledge search and safety copilots. Without clear rules for data classification, retention and lineage, sensitive production data, SOPs and maintenance instructions can flow uncontrolled into AI systems. Governance ensures that only authorized users can access certain classes of information and that data processing paths are traceable.
For knowledge search this means: indexing and retrieval must be controlled at the class level. Data that is personal or confidential should either be masked or kept in separate indices. For safety copilots the control of model outputs is additionally critical: output controls and safe prompting must prevent unsafe or incorrect operational recommendations.
Organizationally, data stewards, EHS officers and AI developers should jointly define rules. Technically, documentation, access controls and monitoring are required. Protocols for handling exceptions and misbehavior are also part of governance.
Concrete benefits: better error prevention, faster problem resolution, reduced liability risks and a stronger foundation for audits. Investments in governance pay off directly in operational safety and compliance.
PIAs for AI projects should start early — ideally already in the concept phase. An effective PIA workflow includes mapping data flows, identifying sensitive data, assessing risks to data subjects and defining technical and organizational countermeasures. In pharmaceutical research patient data, study data and IP are particularly sensitive.
Efficiency comes from templates and reusable assessment components: standardized risk checklists, data classifications and predefined catalogs of measures save time. Compliance automation modules can automatically generate and version PIA documents, minimizing recurring effort.
Crucial is involving data protection officers, research ethics and technical teams. Only interdisciplinary assessments capture regulatory, ethical and technical aspects. When needed, red-teaming tests complement the PIA with practical attack and exploit simulations.
Practical tips: keep the PIA iterative, define clear responsibilities and feed results into decision processes (e.g., model approval). That way the PIA remains an operational control instrument rather than a mere document.
A common problem is system heterogeneity: many MES/ERP landscapes consist of legacy components, proprietary interfaces and heavily customized processes. This complicates standardized integrations and often requires middleware or adapters that ensure secure data transfer and consistency.
Other issues concern latency and availability: AI services often require low latency for real-time decisions. If ERP systems operate in batch modes, architectures must be designed so AI services can be integrated asynchronously and resiliently without disrupting existing processes.
Security aspects are critical: authentication, authorization and encryption must be ensured at all levels. Legacy systems sometimes do not support modern auth standards, which necessitates gateways or secure proxies. Data formats and semantics are often inconsistent — requiring data mapping and harmonization.
Recommendations: start with an integration analysis, develop modular adapters, rely on secure middleware and plan parallel tests in a staging environment. This minimizes operational risks and creates a foundation for stable, secure integrations.
Contact Us!
Contact Directly
Philipp M. W. Hoffmann
Founder & Partner
Address
Reruption GmbH
Falkertstraße 2
70176 Stuttgart
Contact
Phone