The Challenge: Slow Knowledge Lookup

In many customer service teams, agents spend more time hunting for information than actually helping customers. Answers are scattered across wikis, PDFs, legacy knowledge bases, email archives, and old tickets. While a customer is waiting on the phone or in chat, agents click through multiple systems, skim long documents, and try to interpret policies on the fly. The result: long silences, guesswork, and higher stress for everyone involved.

Traditional approaches to knowledge management are not keeping up with this reality. Adding more articles to a static knowledge base, restructuring folders, or running occasional training sessions doesn’t change the core dynamic: humans still have to manually search, interpret, and connect information under time pressure. Classic search is keyword-based, not meaning-based. It can’t read a 40-page policy and surface the three sentences that matter for this specific case while the customer is still on the line.

The business impact of slow knowledge lookup is significant. Handle times increase, queues grow, and first-contact resolution drops, leading directly to higher operational costs and lower customer satisfaction scores. Escalations rise because frontline agents don’t feel confident in their answers, which in turn overloads second-level teams. Over time, these inefficiencies become a competitive disadvantage: your service feels slower and less competent than companies that empower agents with instant, context-aware answers.

This challenge is real, especially in environments with complex products, policies, or regulatory requirements. But it is also very solvable. With tools like Claude, large volumes of policies, manuals, and historical tickets can be turned into real-time guidance during calls and chats. At Reruption, we’ve seen how AI-powered knowledge access can transform day-to-day work for support teams, and in the rest of this guide we’ll walk through concrete ways you can use Claude to fix slow knowledge lookup and improve first-contact resolution.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI-powered document research, chatbots and internal tools, we’ve learned that the real value of Claude in customer service is its ability to read long, messy knowledge sources and turn them into fast, trustworthy answers for agents. Instead of forcing people to adapt to rigid knowledge bases, Claude lets you bring your existing policies, manuals, and ticket history into a single AI layer that responds in real time during conversations. When implemented thoughtfully, this doesn’t just speed up knowledge lookup – it fundamentally raises your first-contact resolution ceiling.

Define "Resolvable at First Contact" for Your Business

Before you implement Claude, get precise about what first-contact resolution means in your context. Some issues can and should be resolved by frontline agents with the right information; others will always require specialist involvement, approvals, or site visits. Map your top contact reasons and classify which ones are realistically solvable at first contact if the agent has perfect knowledge support.

This clarity shapes how you use Claude for customer service. For high-potential categories (e.g. billing questions, policy clarification, standard troubleshooting), invest in deep knowledge coverage and tailored guidance prompts. For inherently complex cases, focus Claude on better triage and data collection instead of full resolution. That way, your AI investment is tightly aligned with business outcomes rather than generic "AI in support" experimentation.

Treat Knowledge as a Product, Not a Static Repository

Many companies try to drop Claude on top of an outdated knowledge base and expect magical results. In practice, you need to treat support knowledge as a living product. That means design ownership, feedback loops, and regular iteration. Identify a small cross-functional team (operations, senior agents, and an AI product owner) who are responsible for the quality and structure of the content Claude will read.

From a strategic perspective, this team decides which document sources Claude should trust, how to handle conflicting policies, and which tone and escalation rules the assistant should follow. Reruption’s experience is that this proactive curation dramatically improves the reliability of AI-powered knowledge lookup and reduces the risk of agents receiving outdated or non-compliant advice.

Embed Claude into Existing Workflows, Not Next to Them

The biggest adoption risk is turning Claude into yet another tool agents have to open on a second screen. Strategically, you want AI-assisted knowledge retrieval to live directly inside your contact center workflows: the CRM view, the ticketing system, or the chat console your team already uses. If agents must constantly switch context, they’ll default back to old habits and your ROI will stall.

Plan your implementation with integration in mind. Decide early where in the agent journey Claude should appear: pre-call case prep, in-call guidance, after-call summaries, or all of the above. Use your existing tech stack’s APIs or middleware so that Claude can see customer data, recent tickets, and relevant documentation without manual copy-paste. This mindset converts Claude from a "nice-to-have tool" into a core part of how your customer service team operates.

Balance Speed with Compliance and Risk Management

Claude’s strength is its ability to read long policies and answer fast – but that same strength requires a clear approach to compliance and risk. You need strategic guardrails: which content is in scope, what must always be quoted verbatim (e.g. legal terms), and when Claude should explicitly tell an agent to escalate or seek approval.

Define these rules in collaboration with legal, compliance, and operations. Then encode them in Claude’s system prompts and retrieval configuration. For regulated scenarios, you may require the AI to show source citations for any critical claim so agents can quickly double-check. This structured approach lets you benefit from rapid knowledge lookup without introducing hidden compliance risks.

Prepare Your Team for Assisted, Not Automated, Resolution

Finally, the human side: Claude should be positioned as an agent co-pilot, not a replacement. Strategically, this shapes how agents relate to the tool. If they fear automation, they will resist it; if they see it as a way to reduce stressful searching and increase confidence with customers, they will actively improve it with feedback.

Invest time in explaining what Claude can and cannot do, where human judgment remains critical, and how feedback will be used to refine prompts and sources. In our experience, when teams are involved in designing the AI assistant and can see their suggestions implemented, adoption and impact on first-contact resolution both increase significantly.

Used thoughtfully, Claude can turn slow, manual searching into real-time, contextual guidance that lifts first-contact resolution and agent confidence. The key is not just plugging in an AI model, but aligning knowledge, workflows, and guardrails around how your support team actually works. Reruption brings the combination of AI engineering depth and on-the-ground implementation experience to make that happen quickly and safely; if you want to explore what this could look like in your own contact center, we’re ready to co-design and build a solution with you.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Banking to Apparel Retail: Learn how companies successfully use Claude.

Morgan Stanley

Banking

Financial advisors at Morgan Stanley struggled with rapid access to the firm's extensive proprietary research database, comprising over 350,000 documents spanning decades of institutional knowledge. Manual searches through this vast repository were time-intensive, often taking 30 minutes or more per query, hindering advisors' ability to deliver timely, personalized advice during client interactions . This bottleneck limited scalability in wealth management, where high-net-worth clients demand immediate, data-driven insights amid volatile markets. Additionally, the sheer volume of unstructured data—40 million words of research reports—made it challenging to synthesize relevant information quickly, risking suboptimal recommendations and reduced client satisfaction. Advisors needed a solution to democratize access to this 'goldmine' of intelligence without extensive training or technical expertise .

Lösung

Morgan Stanley partnered with OpenAI to develop AI @ Morgan Stanley Debrief, a GPT-4-powered generative AI chatbot tailored for wealth management advisors. The tool uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to securely query the firm's proprietary research database, providing instant, context-aware responses grounded in verified sources . Implemented as a conversational assistant, Debrief allows advisors to ask natural-language questions like 'What are the risks of investing in AI stocks?' and receive synthesized answers with citations, eliminating manual digging. Rigorous AI evaluations and human oversight ensure accuracy, with custom fine-tuning to align with Morgan Stanley's institutional knowledge . This approach overcame data silos and enabled seamless integration into advisors' workflows.

Ergebnisse

  • 98% adoption rate among wealth management advisors
  • Access for nearly 50% of Morgan Stanley's total employees
  • Queries answered in seconds vs. 30+ minutes manually
  • Over 350,000 proprietary research documents indexed
  • 60% employee access at peers like JPMorgan for comparison
  • Significant productivity gains reported by CAO
Read case study →

Ford Motor Company

Manufacturing

In Ford's automotive manufacturing plants, vehicle body sanding and painting represented a major bottleneck. These labor-intensive tasks required workers to manually sand car bodies, a process prone to inconsistencies, fatigue, and ergonomic injuries due to repetitive motions over hours . Traditional robotic systems struggled with the variability in body panels, curvatures, and material differences, limiting full automation in legacy 'brownfield' facilities . Additionally, achieving consistent surface quality for painting was critical, as defects could lead to rework, delays, and increased costs. With rising demand for electric vehicles (EVs) and production scaling, Ford needed to modernize without massive CapEx or disrupting ongoing operations, while prioritizing workforce safety and upskilling . The challenge was to integrate scalable automation that collaborated with humans seamlessly.

Lösung

Ford addressed this by deploying AI-guided collaborative robots (cobots) equipped with machine vision and automation algorithms. In the body shop, six cobots use cameras and AI to scan car bodies in real-time, detecting surfaces, defects, and contours with high precision . These systems employ computer vision models for 3D mapping and path planning, allowing cobots to adapt dynamically without reprogramming . The solution emphasized a workforce-first brownfield strategy, starting with pilot deployments in Michigan plants. Cobots handle sanding autonomously while humans oversee quality, reducing injury risks. Partnerships with robotics firms and in-house AI development enabled low-code inspection tools for easy scaling .

Ergebnisse

  • Sanding time: 35 seconds per full car body (vs. hours manually)
  • Productivity boost: 4x faster assembly processes
  • Injury reduction: 70% fewer ergonomic strains in cobot zones
  • Consistency improvement: 95% defect-free surfaces post-sanding
  • Deployment scale: 6 cobots operational, expanding to 50+ units
  • ROI timeline: Payback in 12-18 months per plant
Read case study →

Revolut

Fintech

Revolut faced escalating Authorized Push Payment (APP) fraud, where scammers psychologically manipulate customers into authorizing transfers to fraudulent accounts, often under guises like investment opportunities. Traditional rule-based systems struggled against sophisticated social engineering tactics, leading to substantial financial losses despite Revolut's rapid growth to over 35 million customers worldwide. The rise in digital payments amplified vulnerabilities, with fraudsters exploiting real-time transfers that bypassed conventional checks. APP scams evaded detection by mimicking legitimate behaviors, resulting in billions in global losses annually and eroding customer trust in fintech platforms like Revolut. Urgent need for intelligent, adaptive anomaly detection to intervene before funds were pushed.

Lösung

Revolut deployed an AI-powered scam detection feature using machine learning anomaly detection to monitor transactions and user behaviors in real-time. The system analyzes patterns indicative of scams, such as unusual payment prompts tied to investment lures, and intervenes by alerting users or blocking suspicious actions. Leveraging supervised and unsupervised ML algorithms, it detects deviations from normal behavior during high-risk moments, 'breaking the scammer's spell' before authorization. Integrated into the app, it processes vast transaction data for proactive fraud prevention without disrupting legitimate flows.

Ergebnisse

  • 30% reduction in fraud losses from APP-related card scams
  • Targets investment opportunity scams specifically
  • Real-time intervention during testing phase
  • Protects 35 million global customers
  • Deployed since February 2024
Read case study →

Samsung Electronics

Manufacturing

Samsung Electronics faces immense challenges in consumer electronics manufacturing due to massive-scale production volumes, often exceeding millions of units daily across smartphones, TVs, and semiconductors. Traditional human-led inspections struggle with fatigue-induced errors, missing subtle defects like micro-scratches on OLED panels or assembly misalignments, leading to costly recalls and rework. In facilities like Gumi, South Korea, lines process 30,000 to 50,000 units per shift, where even a 1% defect rate translates to thousands of faulty devices shipped, eroding brand trust and incurring millions in losses annually. Additionally, supply chain volatility and rising labor costs demanded hyper-efficient automation. Pre-AI, reliance on manual QA resulted in inconsistent detection rates (around 85-90% accuracy), with challenges in scaling real-time inspection for diverse components amid Industry 4.0 pressures.

Lösung

Samsung's solution integrates AI-driven machine vision, autonomous robotics, and NVIDIA-powered AI factories for end-to-end quality assurance (QA). Deploying over 50,000 NVIDIA GPUs with Omniverse digital twins, factories simulate and optimize production, enabling robotic arms for precise assembly and vision systems for defect detection at microscopic levels. Implementation began with pilot programs in Gumi's Smart Factory (Gold UL validated), expanding to global sites. Deep learning models trained on vast datasets achieve 99%+ accuracy, automating inspection, sorting, and rework while cobots (collaborative robots) handle repetitive tasks, reducing human error. This vertically integrated ecosystem fuses Samsung's semiconductors, devices, and AI software.

Ergebnisse

  • 30,000-50,000 units inspected per production line daily
  • Near-zero (<0.01%) defect rates in shipped devices
  • 99%+ AI machine vision accuracy for defect detection
  • 50%+ reduction in manual inspection labor
  • $ millions saved annually via early defect catching
  • 50,000+ NVIDIA GPUs deployed in AI factories
Read case study →

Mass General Brigham

Healthcare

Mass General Brigham, one of the largest healthcare systems in the U.S., faced a deluge of medical imaging data from radiology, pathology, and surgical procedures. With millions of scans annually across its 12 hospitals, clinicians struggled with analysis overload, leading to delays in diagnosis and increased burnout rates among radiologists and surgeons. The need for precise, rapid interpretation was critical, as manual reviews limited throughput and risked errors in complex cases like tumor detection or surgical risk assessment. Additionally, operative workflows required better predictive tools. Surgeons needed models to forecast complications, optimize scheduling, and personalize interventions, but fragmented data silos and regulatory hurdles impeded progress. Staff shortages exacerbated these issues, demanding decision support systems to alleviate cognitive load and improve patient outcomes.

Lösung

To address these, Mass General Brigham established a dedicated Artificial Intelligence Center, centralizing research, development, and deployment of hundreds of AI models focused on computer vision for imaging and predictive analytics for surgery. This enterprise-wide initiative integrates ML into clinical workflows, partnering with tech giants like Microsoft for foundation models in medical imaging. Key solutions include deep learning algorithms for automated anomaly detection in X-rays, MRIs, and CTs, reducing radiologist review time. For surgery, predictive models analyze patient data to predict post-op risks, enhancing planning. Robust governance frameworks ensure ethical deployment, addressing bias and explainability.

Ergebnisse

  • $30 million AI investment fund established
  • Hundreds of AI models managed for radiology and pathology
  • Improved diagnostic throughput via AI-assisted radiology
  • AI foundation models developed through Microsoft partnership
  • Initiatives for AI governance in medical imaging deployed
  • Reduced clinician workload and burnout through decision support
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Build a Unified Knowledge Layer for Claude

Start by consolidating the content Claude should use to answer customer service questions. This usually includes FAQs, policy documents, product manuals, internal playbooks, and anonymised ticket histories. Store these in a structured, machine-readable way (e.g. a document store or vector database) rather than scattering them across SharePoint sites, PDFs, and wikis.

Work with IT to set up a retrieval system that lets Claude pull only from approved sources. Tag documents by product, region, language, and validity period so the AI can prioritise the most relevant, up-to-date content. This is the backbone of reliable AI knowledge retrieval and directly influences the quality of first-contact answers.

Design an Agent-Facing Claude Assistant Inside Your Ticketing or CRM System

Integrate Claude where agents already work. For example, in your CRM or helpdesk, add a side panel called “AI Knowledge Assistant” that automatically receives key context from the current case: customer type, product, channel, and conversation transcript.

For live chat or phone support, your system can send the live transcript (or notes) to Claude every few seconds. Claude then returns the most relevant instructions, policy excerpts, or troubleshooting steps without agents having to type full prompts. Behind the scenes, you still use a well-crafted base prompt to structure Claude’s behaviour.

Example system prompt for the agent assistant:
You are an internal customer service assistant for <Company>.

Goals:
- Help agents resolve issues on the first contact
- Always base answers on the provided company knowledge and past tickets
- Quote relevant policy or manual sections with clear references
- If information is missing or unclear, say so and suggest next steps

Format answers as:
- Short summary
- Step-by-step guidance for the agent
- Policy excerpts with document names and sections

This setup lets agents click once to ask, for example, “Summarise applicable policy and recommended resolution” and receive a structured response in seconds.

Create Task-Specific Prompts for Common Support Scenarios

Beyond the general assistant, define targeted prompts for your top contact reasons (billing corrections, warranty questions, cancelations, basic troubleshooting). These can be buttons or quick actions that send a predefined instruction to Claude along with the current case data.

Example prompt: Warranty & Returns Clarification
You are assisting a customer service agent on a live call.

Context:
- Customer question: <paste latest message/transcript>
- Product: <product name>
- Region: <country/market>

Using only the company warranty and returns policies provided, do the following:
1) State whether the customer is eligible for a return, repair, or refund
2) List any conditions or exceptions that apply
3) Provide a clear script the agent can use to explain the decision
4) Highlight any edge cases where the agent should escalate

By standardising these task-specific prompts, you reduce cognitive load for agents and ensure consistent, policy-compliant responses for frequent contact types.

Use Claude to Summarise Long Histories Before and During Contacts

When customers with complex histories call in, agents often waste valuable minutes piecing together previous tickets, emails, and notes. Use Claude to generate concise, actionable summaries before the agent picks up, or in the first seconds of the interaction.

Example prompt: Case Prep Summary
You are preparing a customer service agent for an incoming call.

Input:
- Past tickets (last 12 months)
- Email exchanges
- Internal notes

Produce:
- 3-sentence summary of the customer's history
- List of 3 likely topics or pain points to expect
- Any open actions or promises made previously
- Suggested opening sentence for the agent

These summaries dramatically speed up context-building, reduce repeated questions, and help agents move faster towards resolution on the first contact.

Introduce Source Citations and Confidence Signals for Agents

To build trust, configure Claude to always show where the information came from. Include document titles, sections, and, where possible, deep links back into your knowledge system. Teach agents to quickly skim these citations so they can verify critical details in edge cases.

Example answer format instruction:
When giving guidance, always include:
- "Source documents" with names and section headings
- A short rationale explaining why this policy applies
- A confidence estimate (High/Medium/Low)

If confidence is below High, recommend that the agent:
- Confirms with a supervisor, or
- Escalates according to the escalation matrix

This practice turns Claude into a transparent co-pilot rather than a black box, making it easier to adopt in environments with strict compliance and quality assurance requirements.

Measure Impact with Clear CX and Efficiency KPIs

Finally, treat your Claude rollout like any other operational change: define and track metrics. Common indicators include average handle time (AHT), first-contact resolution rate, time-to-first-answer in chat, number of internal escalations, and QA scores on knowledge accuracy.

Set a short baseline period (4–8 weeks) before broad rollout. Then compare pilot teams using Claude with control groups. A realistic ambition for a well-designed implementation is 10–25% faster handle times on covered contact types, a measurable lift in first-contact resolution for those types, and a noticeable reduction in internal knowledge-related escalations. Use these insights to refine prompts, add missing documents, and prioritise further integrations.

Expected outcome: with a structured approach to knowledge consolidation, workflow integration, and measurement, most organisations can achieve tangible improvements in support efficiency and customer satisfaction within 8–12 weeks of starting their Claude-powered knowledge assistant initiative.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude can read and reason over large volumes of your internal content – policies, manuals, FAQs, and past tickets – and return direct, context-aware answers instead of search results. Instead of agents running multiple keyword searches and opening dozens of tabs, they can ask Claude in natural language while they’re on a call or chat, and receive a concise summary plus step-by-step guidance.

When integrated into your CRM or helpdesk, Claude can also see the current case details and conversation, so it surfaces only the most relevant snippets and troubleshooting flows. This reduces time spent searching, lowers error rates from misinterpreted policies, and increases the share of issues resolved on the first contact.

A focused initial implementation does not require a full-scale transformation. Typically, you need:

  • Access to your key knowledge sources (FAQs, policies, manuals, selected ticket history)
  • Technical access to your CRM/helpdesk or an internal tool where the assistant will live
  • A small cross-functional team: one product/operations owner, one technical owner, and 2–3 experienced agents as testers

With this setup, a realistic timeline is 4–6 weeks to go from idea to a working pilot for a few high-volume contact types. From there, you can iterate on prompts, expand document coverage, and roll out to more teams. Reruption’s AI PoC approach is designed around this kind of fast, contained pilot.

Exact numbers depend on your starting point and complexity, but there are some realistic ranges if Claude is well integrated. For clearly defined contact types with good documentation, companies often see:

  • 10–25% reduction in average handle time on covered issues, mainly from faster lookup and less back-and-forth
  • Higher first-contact resolution for information-heavy queries (billing, policy, standard troubleshooting), because agents have clearer guidance
  • Fewer internal escalations where the only reason was “I couldn’t find the right information”

These improvements typically emerge within a few weeks of agents using the assistant daily. The key is to scope your pilot narrowly, measure impact by contact reason, and continuously refine prompts and knowledge sources based on real usage data.

Costs break down into three main components: usage of the Claude model itself, integration and engineering effort, and some ongoing time to maintain and improve your knowledge layer. The model usage cost is usually modest compared to agent salaries, because each interaction only consumes a small fraction of a cent to a few cents, even for long contexts.

On the ROI side, the biggest levers are reductions in handle time, increased first-contact resolution, and lower training effort for new agents. When you quantify those (e.g. minutes saved per interaction, escalations avoided, ramp-up time reduced), it’s common for an effective implementation to pay back its initial investment within months. Having a contained PoC with clearly defined metrics is the best way to validate this ROI in your environment before a broader rollout.

Reruption combines AI engineering depth with hands-on operational experience to move beyond slideware and into working solutions. Our AI PoC offering is designed exactly for questions like yours: can we use Claude to fix slow knowledge lookup in our customer service, with our data and our systems?

In a fixed-scope engagement, we help you define the use case, select and connect the right knowledge sources, design prompts and guardrails, and build a working prototype integrated into your existing tools. With our Co-Preneur approach, we don’t just advise – we embed alongside your team, iterate on real agent feedback, and leave you with a clear roadmap from PoC to production. If you want to see Claude in action on your own support cases rather than in generic demos, this is the fastest way to get there.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media