The Challenge: No Personalized Learning Paths

HR and L&D leaders are under pressure to offer personalized learning paths, but most rely on generic curricula by role or grade. Mapping each employee’s skills, career goals and learning content manually is simply not feasible at scale. The result is one-size-fits-all learning plans that look efficient on paper but don’t match how individuals actually learn or what the business really needs.

Traditional approaches — static competency matrices, annual training catalogs, and classroom-heavy programs — were designed for a slower world. They can’t keep pace with changing skills requirements, hybrid work, or employees expecting consumer-grade experiences. Even when HR has solid content libraries and an LMS in place, connecting the dots between skills data, performance feedback and learning assets requires hours of manual curation that most L&D teams just don’t have.

When learning is not personalized, the business impact is significant: employees tune out mandatory training, critical skill gaps stay hidden, and high potentials don’t see a clear development path and are more likely to leave. Training budgets are spent on low-impact programs, managers lose trust in L&D recommendations, and HR struggles to show any causal link between learning investments and performance or retention.

This challenge is real, but it is solvable. Modern AI in HR can ingest competency frameworks, role profiles and training content to recommend tailored development journeys automatically. At Reruption, we’ve seen how AI-powered learning design can dramatically increase engagement and shorten time-to-competence when done right. In the rest of this article, we’ll show you how to use Claude specifically to move from generic training plans to adaptive learning paths — step by step, and in a way that fits your existing HR tech landscape.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s experience building AI solutions for HR and L&D, Claude is particularly strong for turning fragmented skills, HR and training data into coherent, conversational learning journeys. By combining our engineering depth with Claude’s ability to reason over long documents and frameworks, we help organisations move beyond static course catalogs and toward adaptive, AI-powered learning paths that fit both the employee and the business.

Start with Clear Skill Taxonomies and Business-Critical Roles

The quality of any AI-driven personalized learning path depends on the structure of the inputs you provide. Before deploying Claude broadly, focus on clarifying your core skill taxonomy and a small set of business-critical roles or career paths. This gives Claude a consistent backbone for mapping employees to the right development steps.

Strategically, pick roles where skill gaps are clearly linked to business outcomes: sales productivity, manufacturing quality, customer support satisfaction, or digital transformation initiatives. When HR can show that personalized learning for these roles moves the needle on concrete KPIs, executive sponsorship and budget for scaling AI in L&D follow much more easily.

Position Claude as a Copilot for L&D, Not a Replacement

Claude should be framed internally as a learning design copilot for HR and L&D professionals, not as an autonomous decision-maker. Your experts remain accountable for defining competency standards, approving learning paths and handling sensitive performance decisions. Claude accelerates the heavy lifting: synthesising input data, proposing drafts and adapting content to different audiences.

This mindset helps with stakeholder buy-in and risk mitigation. Rather than “AI decides who learns what,” the narrative becomes “AI helps our experts build better personalized paths, faster.” From our implementation experience, involving a small group of L&D specialists as co-designers of the prompts and workflows significantly increases trust in the system and the quality of the outputs.

Design Governance and Guardrails from Day One

Using AI in HR touches on sensitive areas: performance data, development decisions and fairness. Governance should not be an afterthought. Define clear guardrails for which data Claude can access, how recommendations are reviewed, and how employees can give feedback or challenge a proposed learning path.

Strategically, you want transparent criteria: for example, development suggestions should be based on observable skills evidence and agreed career goals, not proxies like age or tenure. Reruption typically works with HR, Legal and IT to define access controls, logging and approval flows so that Claude’s recommendations are auditable and compliant with internal policies and regulations.

Prepare Managers and Employees for a New L&D Experience

Even the best AI-powered personalized learning paths fail if managers and employees don’t understand how to use them. Change management should be built into your Claude rollout plan. Equip managers to have better development conversations using Claude’s insights, and show employees how to ask the right questions to get useful career and learning guidance.

At a strategic level, reposition L&D as a continuous, pull-based experience instead of one-time, push-based training. Claude’s conversational interface is ideal for this: employees can explore learning options, ask follow-up questions and adapt their path as projects change. Your communication should emphasise empowerment (“you can drive your own learning journey”) rather than monitoring.

Pilot, Measure, Then Scale with a Portfolio View

Rather than trying to personalize learning for the entire workforce at once, start with a well-scoped pilot: one or two roles, a defined content set and clear success metrics. Use this to test how Claude performs in your specific context and to refine prompts, workflows and governance. A small, well-measured win creates internal proof that AI for personalized learning is more than a buzzword.

As you scale, manage your initiatives as a portfolio: some use cases will focus on time savings for L&D teams, others on faster onboarding, and others on upskilling for strategic skills. Looking across this portfolio helps HR prioritise where to extend Claude next and supports a structured investment case for AI in L&D rather than ad-hoc experimentation.

Using Claude to solve the “no personalized learning paths” problem is less about plugging in a chatbot and more about rethinking how you design, govern and deliver development journeys. When skill taxonomies, guardrails and change management are in place, Claude can become a powerful copilot for HR and L&D, turning static catalogs into adaptive, high-impact learning paths. Reruption brings the AI engineering, HR process understanding and Co-Preneur mindset needed to make this work end-to-end — from first pilot to scaled deployment. If you want to explore what this could look like in your organisation, we’re ready to dive into a concrete use case with you.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Healthcare to Banking: Learn how companies successfully use Claude.

Pfizer

Healthcare

The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented urgent need for new antiviral treatments, as traditional drug discovery timelines span 10-15 years with success rates below 10%. Pfizer faced immense pressure to identify potent, oral inhibitors targeting the SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease (Mpro), a key viral enzyme, while ensuring safety and efficacy in humans. Structure-based drug design (SBDD) required analyzing complex protein structures and generating millions of potential molecules, but conventional computational methods were too slow, consuming vast resources and time. Challenges included limited structural data early in the pandemic, high failure risks in hit identification, and the need to run processes in parallel amid global uncertainty. Pfizer's teams had to overcome data scarcity, integrate disparate datasets, and scale simulations without compromising accuracy, all while traditional wet-lab validation lagged behind.

Lösung

Pfizer deployed AI-driven pipelines leveraging machine learning (ML) for SBDD, using models to predict protein-ligand interactions and generate novel molecules via generative AI. Tools analyzed cryo-EM and X-ray structures of the SARS-CoV-2 protease, enabling virtual screening of billions of compounds and de novo design optimized for binding affinity, pharmacokinetics, and synthesizability. By integrating supercomputing with ML algorithms, Pfizer streamlined hit-to-lead optimization, running parallel simulations that identified PF-07321332 (nirmatrelvir) as the lead candidate. This lightspeed approach combined ML with human expertise, reducing iterative cycles and accelerating from target validation to preclinical nomination.

Ergebnisse

  • Drug candidate nomination: 4 months vs. typical 2-5 years
  • Computational chemistry processes reduced: 80-90%
  • Drug discovery timeline cut: From years to 30 days for key phases
  • Clinical trial success rate boost: Up to 12% (vs. industry ~5-10%)
  • Virtual screening scale: Billions of compounds screened rapidly
  • Paxlovid efficacy: 89% reduction in hospitalization/death
Read case study →

BMW (Spartanburg Plant)

Automotive Manufacturing

The BMW Spartanburg Plant, the company's largest globally producing X-series SUVs, faced intense pressure to optimize assembly processes amid rising demand for SUVs and supply chain disruptions. Traditional manufacturing relied heavily on human workers for repetitive tasks like part transport and insertion, leading to worker fatigue, error rates up to 5-10% in precision tasks, and inefficient resource allocation. With over 11,500 employees handling high-volume production, scheduling shifts and matching workers to tasks manually caused delays and cycle time variability of 15-20%, hindering output scalability. Compounding issues included adapting to Industry 4.0 standards, where rigid robotic arms struggled with flexible tasks in dynamic environments. Labor shortages post-pandemic exacerbated this, with turnover rates climbing, and the need to redeploy skilled workers to value-added roles while minimizing downtime. Machine vision limitations in older systems failed to detect subtle defects, resulting in quality escapes and rework costs estimated at millions annually.

Lösung

BMW partnered with Figure AI to deploy Figure 02 humanoid robots integrated with machine vision for real-time object detection and ML scheduling algorithms for dynamic task allocation. These robots use advanced AI to perceive environments via cameras and sensors, enabling autonomous navigation and manipulation in human-robot collaborative settings. ML models predict production bottlenecks, optimize robot-worker scheduling, and self-monitor performance, reducing human oversight. Implementation involved pilot testing in 2024, where robots handled repetitive tasks like part picking and insertion, coordinated via a central AI orchestration platform. This allowed seamless integration into existing lines, with digital twins simulating scenarios for safe rollout. Challenges like initial collision risks were overcome through reinforcement learning fine-tuning, achieving human-like dexterity.

Ergebnisse

  • 400% increase in robot speed post-trials
  • 7x higher task success rate
  • Reduced cycle times by 20-30%
  • Redeployed 10-15% of workers to skilled tasks
  • $1M+ annual cost savings from efficiency gains
  • Error rates dropped below 1%
Read case study →

Associated Press (AP)

News Media

In the mid-2010s, the Associated Press (AP) faced significant constraints in its business newsroom due to limited manual resources. With only a handful of journalists dedicated to earnings coverage, AP could produce just around 300 quarterly earnings reports per quarter, primarily focusing on major S&P 500 companies. This manual process was labor-intensive: reporters had to extract data from financial filings, analyze key metrics like revenue, profits, and growth rates, and craft concise narratives under tight deadlines. As the number of publicly traded companies grew, AP struggled to cover smaller firms, leaving vast amounts of market-relevant information unreported. This limitation not only reduced AP's comprehensive market coverage but also tied up journalists on rote tasks, preventing them from pursuing investigative stories or deeper analysis. The pressure of quarterly earnings seasons amplified these issues, with deadlines coinciding across thousands of companies, making scalable reporting impossible without innovation.

Lösung

To address this, AP partnered with Automated Insights in 2014, implementing their Wordsmith NLG platform. Wordsmith uses templated algorithms to transform structured financial data—such as earnings per share, revenue figures, and year-over-year changes—into readable, journalistic prose. Reporters input verified data from sources like Zacks Investment Research, and the AI generates draft stories in seconds, which humans then lightly edit for accuracy and style. The solution involved creating custom NLG templates tailored to AP's style, ensuring stories sounded human-written while adhering to journalistic standards. This hybrid approach—AI for volume, humans for oversight—overcame quality concerns. By 2015, AP announced it would automate the majority of U.S. corporate earnings stories, scaling coverage dramatically without proportional staff increases.

Ergebnisse

  • 14x increase in quarterly earnings stories: 300 to 4,200
  • Coverage expanded to 4,000+ U.S. public companies per quarter
  • Equivalent to freeing time of 20 full-time reporters
  • Stories published in seconds vs. hours manually
  • Zero reported errors in automated stories post-implementation
  • Sustained use expanded to sports, weather, and lottery reports
Read case study →

Revolut

Fintech

Revolut faced escalating Authorized Push Payment (APP) fraud, where scammers psychologically manipulate customers into authorizing transfers to fraudulent accounts, often under guises like investment opportunities. Traditional rule-based systems struggled against sophisticated social engineering tactics, leading to substantial financial losses despite Revolut's rapid growth to over 35 million customers worldwide. The rise in digital payments amplified vulnerabilities, with fraudsters exploiting real-time transfers that bypassed conventional checks. APP scams evaded detection by mimicking legitimate behaviors, resulting in billions in global losses annually and eroding customer trust in fintech platforms like Revolut. Urgent need for intelligent, adaptive anomaly detection to intervene before funds were pushed.

Lösung

Revolut deployed an AI-powered scam detection feature using machine learning anomaly detection to monitor transactions and user behaviors in real-time. The system analyzes patterns indicative of scams, such as unusual payment prompts tied to investment lures, and intervenes by alerting users or blocking suspicious actions. Leveraging supervised and unsupervised ML algorithms, it detects deviations from normal behavior during high-risk moments, 'breaking the scammer's spell' before authorization. Integrated into the app, it processes vast transaction data for proactive fraud prevention without disrupting legitimate flows.

Ergebnisse

  • 30% reduction in fraud losses from APP-related card scams
  • Targets investment opportunity scams specifically
  • Real-time intervention during testing phase
  • Protects 35 million global customers
  • Deployed since February 2024
Read case study →

Samsung Electronics

Manufacturing

Samsung Electronics faces immense challenges in consumer electronics manufacturing due to massive-scale production volumes, often exceeding millions of units daily across smartphones, TVs, and semiconductors. Traditional human-led inspections struggle with fatigue-induced errors, missing subtle defects like micro-scratches on OLED panels or assembly misalignments, leading to costly recalls and rework. In facilities like Gumi, South Korea, lines process 30,000 to 50,000 units per shift, where even a 1% defect rate translates to thousands of faulty devices shipped, eroding brand trust and incurring millions in losses annually. Additionally, supply chain volatility and rising labor costs demanded hyper-efficient automation. Pre-AI, reliance on manual QA resulted in inconsistent detection rates (around 85-90% accuracy), with challenges in scaling real-time inspection for diverse components amid Industry 4.0 pressures.

Lösung

Samsung's solution integrates AI-driven machine vision, autonomous robotics, and NVIDIA-powered AI factories for end-to-end quality assurance (QA). Deploying over 50,000 NVIDIA GPUs with Omniverse digital twins, factories simulate and optimize production, enabling robotic arms for precise assembly and vision systems for defect detection at microscopic levels. Implementation began with pilot programs in Gumi's Smart Factory (Gold UL validated), expanding to global sites. Deep learning models trained on vast datasets achieve 99%+ accuracy, automating inspection, sorting, and rework while cobots (collaborative robots) handle repetitive tasks, reducing human error. This vertically integrated ecosystem fuses Samsung's semiconductors, devices, and AI software.

Ergebnisse

  • 30,000-50,000 units inspected per production line daily
  • Near-zero (<0.01%) defect rates in shipped devices
  • 99%+ AI machine vision accuracy for defect detection
  • 50%+ reduction in manual inspection labor
  • $ millions saved annually via early defect catching
  • 50,000+ NVIDIA GPUs deployed in AI factories
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Centralise Your Inputs: Skills, Roles and Content

Before asking Claude to generate personalized learning journeys, assemble the raw materials it needs: your competency framework, role profiles, training catalog and any existing development guidelines. Even if these live in different systems (HRIS, LMS, spreadsheets), export representative samples and create a structured bundle for Claude to work with.

In a secure environment, you can provide Claude with these documents and ask it to build a unified view. For example, start with a prompt like:

You are an L&D architect helping HR build a unified skill and learning map.

Inputs you will receive:
1) A competency framework with skills and proficiency levels
2) Role profiles with responsibilities
3) A training catalog with titles, descriptions and target audiences

Task:
- Merge these into a structured model:
  - For each role: key skills and target levels
  - For each skill: relevant courses, modules and formats
- Highlight missing skills or areas with too few learning resources.
- Output as a structured text table that we can copy to Excel.

This creates a practical base map that your L&D team can refine and later use as reference for Claude when generating personalized plans.

Generate Role-Based Learning Path Templates

Instead of starting from scratch for each employee, use Claude to create role-based learning path templates that you can then personalize further. These templates should reflect must-have skills, recommended sequencing, and a mix of learning formats (courses, on-the-job practice, coaching, microlearning).

Provide Claude with your unified skill map and then prompt it like this:

You are an HR learning designer.

Context:
- Target role: Inside Sales Representative
- Required skills and levels: see the attached skills-role map
- Available trainings: see the attached training catalog

Task:
1) Create a 6-month learning path template for this role.
2) Structure it by month with clear milestones.
3) Mix formats: e-learning, live training, practice tasks, manager check-ins.
4) For each step, specify:
   - Objective
   - Recommended content (from the catalog)
   - Expected time investment
   - How to evidence skill progress.

Once you validate a few templates, standardise them and store them in your LMS or HR knowledge base as starting points for individual personalization.

Personalize Paths Based on Skill Gaps and Career Goals

With templates in place, you can use Claude to tailor the path to each employee based on their current skills and future goals. This can be done through HR input (e.g. performance reviews, assessments) or, more powerfully, via a conversational career assistant that employees interact with directly.

Here is an example prompt for individual personalization:

You are a career development assistant for our company.

Inputs:
- Role-based learning path template for "Inside Sales Representative"
- Employee's current role: Junior Inside Sales Representative
- Skill self-assessment and manager feedback (attached)
- Employee's career goal: move into Key Account Management in 2-3 years

Task:
1) Analyse the skill gaps vs. the target levels.
2) Adapt the 6-month template to this individual:
   - Prioritise closing the most critical gaps
   - Add 1-2 elements that support the long-term career goal
3) Output a clear, motivating 6-month learning plan with monthly focus areas and specific actions.
4) Use language that is easy to understand for a non-expert.

L&D or managers can review and adjust these personalized plans before sharing them with the employee, keeping people in the loop while dramatically reducing manual work.

Use Claude to Create Microlearning and Practice Tasks

Generic e-learning often fails because it is too long and not tied to daily work. Claude is well-suited to generate microlearning content and practical exercises directly aligned with your roles and tools. You can give Claude internal documents (playbooks, policies, process descriptions) and ask it to produce short, contextual learning assets.

For example:

You are an L&D content creator.

Input:
- Our internal sales playbook for handling objections (attached)
- Target audience: new Inside Sales Representatives

Task:
1) Create 5 microlearning units (5-10 minutes each).
2) For each unit, provide:
   - A short explanation (max. 200 words)
   - 3-4 realistic practice scenarios based on our context
   - Reflection questions that the learner can discuss with their manager.
3) Adapt the tone to be practical and conversational.

These assets can be embedded into your LMS, shared via collaboration tools, or surfaced directly by a Claude-based learning assistant when the employee asks for help on a specific topic.

Set Up Feedback Loops and Track ROI

To ensure your AI-powered learning paths actually work, build feedback and analytics into the workflow from the beginning. Combine usage data (which recommendations employees follow, which modules they complete) with outcome data (skills assessment changes, performance metrics, retention) and qualitative feedback.

Claude can help summarise and interpret this data for HR. For example:

You are an L&D analytics assistant.

Inputs:
- Completion and engagement data for the personalized learning paths pilot
- Pre- and post-assessment scores on key skills
- Employee feedback comments
- KPIs: sales productivity, onboarding time, internal mobility rate

Task:
1) Summarise the impact of the personalized learning paths pilot.
2) Identify which types of recommendations worked best.
3) Highlight any patterns by role or manager.
4) Suggest 3-5 concrete improvements to our prompts, content, or workflows.

From an ROI perspective, track at least three dimensions: reduced L&D design time (hours saved), business performance improvements (e.g. faster ramp-up, fewer errors), and retention or internal mobility gains among target roles. This creates a tangible case for further investment.

When implemented this way, companies typically see realistic outcomes such as a 30–50% reduction in manual effort to design development plans for pilot roles, noticeably faster onboarding (often 20–30% shorter time-to-productivity), and improved engagement scores with learning offerings in targeted populations. The exact numbers will depend on your starting point, but with disciplined prompts, governance and measurement, Claude can turn the “no personalized learning paths” problem into a structured, measurable AI-enabled L&D capability.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude can ingest your competency frameworks, role profiles, training catalogs and assessment data and use them as a structured knowledge base. Based on this, it can generate role-based learning path templates and then adapt them to each employee using inputs such as current role, skill gaps, performance feedback and career goals.

In practice, we configure workflows where HR or managers provide key data points (or where employees interact with a Claude-powered assistant), and Claude returns a proposed development plan with recommended modules, sequencing and practice tasks. HR and managers remain in control: they review, adjust and approve the plans before they are final.

You do not need a large AI team, but you do need a few core capabilities: an L&D owner who understands your skills and role architecture, an HR/IT contact who can provide access to relevant data and systems, and someone with basic technical skills to work with Reruption on integrating Claude into your environment.

We typically form a small cross-functional squad (HR/L&D, IT, sometimes Data Protection) and handle the AI engineering on our side. Your team focuses on providing source materials, validating outputs and defining governance rules. Over time, we enable your people to maintain prompts and workflows themselves so you are not dependent on external consultants.

With a focused scope, you can see concrete results within a few weeks. A typical first phase with Claude might look like this: 1–2 weeks to consolidate skills and content data for one or two roles, 1–2 weeks to build and refine the initial prompt workflows, and another 2–4 weeks for a pilot where you generate and test personalized learning paths with a defined group of employees.

Meaningful impact on KPIs like time-to-productivity or skill assessment scores usually appears over one or two performance cycles (3–6 months), depending on the complexity of the roles. The key is to start narrow, measure carefully and then expand to additional roles once you have a working pattern.

The direct usage cost of Claude is typically modest compared to traditional training spend; most of the investment is in designing workflows, integrating with your HR/LMS stack and change management. By structuring the work as a focused use case, you can contain initial costs and validate value quickly.

On the return side, organisations usually see ROI in three areas: reduced manual effort in creating development plans (L&D and HR time saved), faster skill development for target roles (shorter onboarding, better performance metrics) and improved retention in critical talent segments due to more visible career paths and tailored development. In our experience, even conservative gains in these dimensions can quickly outweigh the initial setup and operating costs.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur alongside your HR and L&D teams. We start with our AI PoC offering (9,900€) to prove that a specific use case — for example, personalized onboarding paths for one role family — works in your environment. This includes scoping, feasibility checks, a working prototype with Claude, performance evaluation and a concrete production plan.

Beyond the PoC, we support hands-on implementation: integrating Claude with your HR and learning systems, designing prompts and workflows, setting up governance and enabling your team to operate and extend the solution. Our Co-Preneur approach means we don’t just hand over slideware; we embed with your people, challenge assumptions and iterate until a real, AI-driven personalized learning capability is live and delivering results.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media