The Challenge: Unstructured Onboarding Feedback

Most HR teams collect onboarding feedback, but it arrives in every possible format: survey free-text fields, emails to managers, Slack or Teams messages, comments in learning platforms, exit interviews, and notes from HR business partners. The result is unstructured onboarding feedback that lives in silos. You know there are issues, but it is hard to see exactly what is broken, for whom, and how urgently it needs fixing.

Traditional approaches rely on sporadic CSAT/NPS scores, manual reading of verbatim comments, or one-off Excel analyses from HR analysts. This might work for very small cohorts, but at scale it breaks down. Analysts cannot read thousands of comments every quarter, local HR teams interpret feedback differently, and by the time a PowerPoint summary is ready, the next wave of new hires is already going through the same problems. Without automation and intelligent text analysis, pattern detection across cohorts, locations, and roles simply does not happen.

The business impact is significant. Slow or ineffective onboarding increases time-to-productivity, frustrates managers, and quietly fuels early attrition. Critical issues — for example missing equipment, unclear responsibilities, or inconsistent expectations — keep repeating because HR only hears anecdotal complaints rather than seeing data-backed trends. Poorly understood onboarding quality makes it hard to justify investments in better enablement, manager training, or localized content. Over time, you lose competitive edge in talent retention and employer brand because new hires do not feel listened to.

The good news: this challenge is very solvable. Modern AI, and Gemini in particular, can process multi-format onboarding feedback at scale, extract themes and sentiment, and surface granular insights by role, location, or manager. At Reruption, we have seen similar dynamics in other HR and people-facing processes, and we know how to move from anecdotal feedback to a data-driven improvement loop. Below, you will find practical guidance on how to use Gemini to turn your unstructured onboarding feedback into a continuous improvement engine for HR.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption's work building AI-first HR solutions, we see the same pattern across organisations: they collect plenty of onboarding feedback, but lack a systematic way to analyse and act on it. Gemini is well suited for this problem because it can handle long-form text, mixed languages, and even attached documents, then summarise and classify them into clear, HR-relevant signals. Our perspective: the real value does not come from flashy dashboards, but from embedding Gemini into the onboarding workflow so that HR, managers and local teams continuously receive actionable insights, not just reports.

Treat Feedback Analysis as a Continuous Product, Not a Quarterly Report

Most HR teams treat onboarding feedback as a periodic reporting task: collect, analyse, present, forget. To get value from Gemini for onboarding feedback, you need to treat the insight layer as a product that evolves every month. Define who your "users" are (central HR, local HR, line managers, onboarding program owners) and what decisions they need to make based on feedback. This mindset shift helps ensure that any Gemini implementation is tied to real, recurring decisions, not abstract analytics.

Strategically, this means designing a feedback operating rhythm: how often insights are generated, how they are reviewed, and how changes are prioritised. Gemini can generate weekly or monthly syntheses by cohort, role or geography, but someone needs ownership for turning those into experiments or process updates. Consider assigning a "Feedback Product Owner" in HR who treats the onboarding feedback system as a living product, not a side activity.

Start with Clear Questions Before Feeding Data into Gemini

AI tools like Gemini are flexible, but without clear questions they will produce generic summaries. Before you integrate any data, define the strategic questions you want answered. Examples: "Which steps in our onboarding journey cause the most friction?", "Where do new hires feel least supported by their manager?", "What differences exist between remote and on-site onboarding experiences?" These questions become the backbone for your prompts, taxonomies, and dashboards.

Aligning HR, People Analytics, and business stakeholders on those questions is a crucial readiness step. It avoids a situation where each party wants different metrics and the AI setup becomes fragmented. Once the questions are clear, Gemini can be instructed to tag feedback by themes, map comments to specific onboarding stages, and surface root-cause patterns instead of vague sentiment scores.

Design a Governance Model for Sensitive People Data

Onboarding feedback is often rich with personal and sensitive information. Strategically, you need a governance model before pushing this data through Gemini-based workflows. Clarify what data is ingested, how it is pseudonymised or anonymised, and which user groups can see identifiable vs. aggregated insights. Involve your data protection officer and works council early to build trust and avoid friction later.

From a risk mitigation perspective, define guardrails around manager-level insights. For example, only show named manager views when cohorts exceed a certain threshold, and default to aggregated reporting for small teams. Use Gemini to automatically mask names and personally identifying details when generating summaries, so the focus stays on structural onboarding issues, not on individuals.

Prepare HR and Managers to Work with AI-Generated Insights

Even the best Gemini onboarding analytics will fail if HR and managers are not ready to use them. Strategically, you need to build data literacy and AI literacy together. HR business partners should feel confident interpreting themes, questioning potential biases, and translating insights into concrete actions with line managers. Managers should understand that AI-summarised feedback is an input to conversations with their teams, not a performance rating.

We recommend framing Gemini as an "insight co-pilot" rather than an evaluator. Train managers on how to respond to recurring feedback patterns in their teams and how to close the loop with new hires when changes are made. This cultural groundwork helps to embed data-driven onboarding improvements into everyday management practices instead of leaving them as HR-only initiatives.

Plan for Iteration: Your First Model Will Not Be Your Final Model

It is tempting to design the perfect taxonomy of themes, sentiments, and onboarding stages from day one. In practice, the most successful Gemini onboarding feedback implementations start simple and evolve. Define a small set of core themes (e.g., pre-boarding, day one, tools & access, role clarity, manager support, culture & inclusion) and let Gemini classify feedback accordingly. Then, review misclassifications and edge cases every few weeks and refine prompts or categories.

This iterative approach keeps risk low and aligns with a Co-Preneur mindset: ship something usable quickly, then improve based on real usage. It also helps you learn what granularity of insights HR and managers actually use. Over time, you might move from simple themes to role-specific or region-specific taxonomies, but only after proving that the basics deliver value.

Used thoughtfully, Gemini can turn your unstructured onboarding feedback into a continuous insight engine that informs program design, manager coaching, and content localisation. The key is not just technical integration but aligning questions, governance, and decision-making around the insights it produces. Reruption combines deep AI engineering with hands-on HR experience to design and embed these feedback systems so they actually change onboarding outcomes; if you want to explore what this could look like in your organisation, we are ready to work alongside your team rather than just advise from the sidelines.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Agriculture to Payments: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

John Deere

Agriculture

In conventional agriculture, farmers rely on blanket spraying of herbicides across entire fields, leading to significant waste. This approach applies chemicals indiscriminately to crops and weeds alike, resulting in high costs for inputs—herbicides can account for 10-20% of variable farming expenses—and environmental harm through soil contamination, water runoff, and accelerated weed resistance . Globally, weeds cause up to 34% yield losses, but overuse of herbicides exacerbates resistance in over 500 species, threatening food security . For row crops like cotton, corn, and soybeans, distinguishing weeds from crops is particularly challenging due to visual similarities, varying field conditions (light, dust, speed), and the need for real-time decisions at 15 mph spraying speeds. Labor shortages and rising chemical prices in 2025 further pressured farmers, with U.S. herbicide costs exceeding $6B annually . Traditional methods failed to balance efficacy, cost, and sustainability.

Lösung

See & Spray revolutionizes weed control by integrating high-resolution cameras, AI-powered computer vision, and precision nozzles on sprayers. The system captures images every few inches, uses object detection models to identify weeds (over 77 species) versus crops in milliseconds, and activates sprays only on targets—reducing blanket application . John Deere acquired Blue River Technology in 2017 to accelerate development, training models on millions of annotated images for robust performance across conditions. Available in Premium (high-density) and Select (affordable retrofit) versions, it integrates with existing John Deere equipment via edge computing for real-time inference without cloud dependency . This robotic precision minimizes drift and overlap, aligning with sustainability goals.

Ergebnisse

  • 5 million acres treated in 2025
  • 31 million gallons of herbicide mix saved
  • Nearly 50% reduction in non-residual herbicide use
  • 77+ weed species detected accurately
  • Up to 90% less chemical in clean crop areas
  • ROI within 1-2 seasons for adopters
Read case study →

NYU Langone Health

Healthcare

NYU Langone Health, a leading academic medical center, faced significant hurdles in leveraging the vast amounts of unstructured clinical notes generated daily across its network. Traditional clinical predictive models relied heavily on structured data like lab results and vitals, but these required complex ETL processes that were time-consuming and limited in scope. Unstructured notes, rich with nuanced physician insights, were underutilized due to challenges in natural language processing, hindering accurate predictions of critical outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and operational events like insurance denials. Clinicians needed real-time, scalable tools to identify at-risk patients early, but existing models struggled with the volume and variability of EHR data—over 4 million notes spanning a decade. This gap led to reactive care, increased costs, and suboptimal patient outcomes, prompting the need for an innovative approach to transform raw text into actionable foresight.

Lösung

To address these challenges, NYU Langone's Division of Applied AI Technologies at the Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science developed NYUTron, a proprietary large language model (LLM) specifically trained on internal clinical notes. Unlike off-the-shelf models, NYUTron was fine-tuned on unstructured EHR text from millions of encounters, enabling it to serve as an all-purpose prediction engine for diverse tasks. The solution involved pre-training a 13-billion-parameter LLM on over 10 years of de-identified notes (approximately 4.8 million inpatient notes), followed by task-specific fine-tuning. This allowed seamless integration into clinical workflows, automating risk flagging directly from physician documentation without manual data structuring. Collaborative efforts, including AI 'Prompt-a-Thons,' accelerated adoption by engaging clinicians in model refinement.

Ergebnisse

  • AUROC: 0.961 for 48-hour mortality prediction (vs. 0.938 benchmark)
  • 92% accuracy in identifying high-risk patients from notes
  • LOS prediction AUROC: 0.891 (5.6% improvement over prior models)
  • Readmission prediction: AUROC 0.812, outperforming clinicians in some tasks
  • Operational predictions (e.g., insurance denial): AUROC up to 0.85
  • 24 clinical tasks with superior performance across mortality, LOS, and comorbidities
Read case study →

Waymo (Alphabet)

Transportation

Developing fully autonomous ride-hailing demanded overcoming extreme challenges in AI reliability for real-world roads. Waymo needed to master perception—detecting objects in fog, rain, night, or occlusions using sensors alone—while predicting erratic human behaviors like jaywalking or sudden lane changes. Planning complex trajectories in dense, unpredictable urban traffic, and precise control to execute maneuvers without collisions, required near-perfect accuracy, as a single failure could be catastrophic . Scaling from tests to commercial fleets introduced hurdles like handling edge cases (e.g., school buses with stop signs, emergency vehicles), regulatory approvals across cities, and public trust amid scrutiny. Incidents like failing to stop for school buses highlighted software gaps, prompting recalls. Massive data needs for training, compute-intensive models, and geographic adaptation (e.g., right-hand vs. left-hand driving) compounded issues, with competitors struggling on scalability .

Lösung

Waymo's Waymo Driver stack integrates deep learning end-to-end: perception fuses lidar, radar, and cameras via convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformers for 3D object detection, tracking, and semantic mapping with high fidelity. Prediction models forecast multi-agent behaviors using graph neural networks and video transformers trained on billions of simulated and real miles . For planning, Waymo applied scaling laws—larger models with more data/compute yield power-law gains in forecasting accuracy and trajectory quality—shifting from rule-based to ML-driven motion planning for human-like decisions. Control employs reinforcement learning and model-predictive control hybridized with neural policies for smooth, safe execution. Vast datasets from 96M+ autonomous miles, plus simulations, enable continuous improvement; recent AI strategy emphasizes modular, scalable stacks .

Ergebnisse

  • 450,000+ weekly paid robotaxi rides (Dec 2025)
  • 96 million autonomous miles driven (through June 2025)
  • 3.5x better avoiding injury-causing crashes vs. humans
  • 2x better avoiding police-reported crashes vs. humans
  • Over 71M miles with detailed safety crash analysis
  • 250,000 weekly rides (April 2025 baseline, since doubled)
Read case study →

Visa

Payments

The payments industry faced a surge in online fraud, particularly enumeration attacks where threat actors use automated scripts and botnets to test stolen card details at scale. These attacks exploit vulnerabilities in card-not-present transactions, causing $1.1 billion in annual fraud losses globally and significant operational expenses for issuers. Visa needed real-time detection to combat this without generating high false positives that block legitimate customers, especially amid rising e-commerce volumes like Cyber Monday spikes. Traditional fraud systems struggled with the speed and sophistication of these attacks, amplified by AI-driven bots. Visa's challenge was to analyze vast transaction data in milliseconds, identifying anomalous patterns while maintaining seamless user experiences. This required advanced AI and machine learning to predict and score risks accurately.

Lösung

Visa developed the Visa Account Attack Intelligence (VAAI) Score, a generative AI-powered tool that scores the likelihood of enumeration attacks in real-time for card-not-present transactions. By leveraging generative AI components alongside machine learning models, VAAI detects sophisticated patterns from botnets and scripts that evade legacy rules-based systems. Integrated into Visa's broader AI-driven fraud ecosystem, including Identity Behavior Analysis, the solution enhances risk scoring with behavioral insights. Rolled out first to U.S. issuers in 2024, it reduces both fraud and false declines, optimizing operations. This approach allows issuers to proactively mitigate threats at unprecedented scale.

Ergebnisse

  • $40 billion in fraud prevented (Oct 2022-Sep 2023)
  • Nearly 2x increase YoY in fraud prevention
  • $1.1 billion annual global losses from enumeration attacks targeted
  • 85% more fraudulent transactions blocked on Cyber Monday 2024 YoY
  • Handled 200% spike in fraud attempts without service disruption
  • Enhanced risk scoring accuracy via ML and Identity Behavior Analysis
Read case study →

Bank of America

Banking

Bank of America faced a high volume of routine customer inquiries, such as account balances, payments, and transaction histories, overwhelming traditional call centers and support channels. With millions of daily digital banking users, the bank struggled to provide 24/7 personalized financial advice at scale, leading to inefficiencies, longer wait times, and inconsistent service quality. Customers demanded proactive insights beyond basic queries, like spending patterns or financial recommendations, but human agents couldn't handle the sheer scale without escalating costs. Additionally, ensuring conversational naturalness in a regulated industry like banking posed challenges, including compliance with financial privacy laws, accurate interpretation of complex queries, and seamless integration into the mobile app without disrupting user experience. The bank needed to balance AI automation with human-like empathy to maintain trust and high satisfaction scores.

Lösung

Bank of America developed Erica, an in-house NLP-powered virtual assistant integrated directly into its mobile banking app, leveraging natural language processing and predictive analytics to handle queries conversationally. Erica acts as a gateway for self-service, processing routine tasks instantly while offering personalized insights, such as cash flow predictions or tailored advice, using client data securely. The solution evolved from a basic navigation tool to a sophisticated AI, incorporating generative AI elements for more natural interactions and escalating complex issues to human agents seamlessly. Built with a focus on in-house language models, it ensures control over data privacy and customization, driving enterprise-wide AI adoption while enhancing digital engagement.

Ergebnisse

  • 3+ billion total client interactions since 2018
  • Nearly 50 million unique users assisted
  • 58+ million interactions per month (2025)
  • 2 billion interactions reached by April 2024 (doubled from 1B in 18 months)
  • 42 million clients helped by 2024
  • 19% earnings spike linked to efficiency gains
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Centralise All Onboarding Feedback into a Single Gemini Pipeline

The first tactical step is to gather all relevant onboarding feedback into one place so Gemini can analyse it consistently. This typically includes survey free-text fields, email feedback sent to HR or managers, messages from collaboration tools (Teams, Slack), comments from your LMS or onboarding platform, and notes from HR conversations when available and appropriate.

Use your existing integration stack or lightweight scripts to pull data into a central store (e.g., a data warehouse, Google BigQuery, or a secure document store). Tag each piece of feedback with metadata such as hire ID or anonymous identifier, role, department, location, manager, and onboarding stage or date. Then configure a scheduled process that passes new feedback batches to Gemini for analysis, so you avoid manual exports.

High-level workflow configuration:
1) Collect feedback from:
   - Survey tool API (e.g., Typeform, Qualtrics)
   - Email inbox (e.g., onboarding@company.com)
   - Slack/Teams channel exports
   - LMS/onboarding platform comments
2) Normalize into common schema:
   - feedback_text
   - channel
   - date
   - location, role, department
   - manager_id, cohort_id
3) Send batches daily/weekly to Gemini for processing via API.
4) Store Gemini outputs (themes, sentiment, priority) back into your warehouse.

Use Structured Prompts to Extract Themes, Sentiment and Onboarding Stages

Once data flows into Gemini, design prompts that consistently extract the dimensions you care about: themes, sentiment, severity, and onboarding stage. Treat the prompt as a small specification and refine it over time based on examples from your own feedback. The goal is to make Gemini's outputs directly usable for reporting and root cause analysis.

Below is an example prompt structure you can adapt to your context:

Example Gemini prompt for onboarding feedback analysis:
You are an HR analytics assistant helping improve employee onboarding.

Task:
Analyse the following onboarding feedback and respond in JSON with:
- primary_theme: one of ["pre-boarding", "first-day-experience", "tools-and-access",
  "role-clarity", "manager-support", "team-integration", "culture-and-inclusion",
  "learning-and-training", "other"]
- secondary_themes: list of additional relevant themes from the same list
- onboarding_stage: one of ["before-start", "week-1", "month-1", "month-3", "later"]
- sentiment: one of ["very-negative", "negative", "neutral", "positive", "very-positive"]
- severity: 1-5 (5 = urgent issue that blocks productivity)
- summary: 1-2 sentence summary of the feedback
- improvement_ideas: up to 3 concrete suggestions the company could implement

Feedback text:
"""
{{feedback_text}}
"""

Run this prompt across your feedback corpus via API or an internal tool and log the structured outputs. These structured fields become the basis for dashboards and automated alerts.

Build Role- and Region-Specific Dashboards for HR and Managers

After Gemini is classifying feedback consistently, visualise the results for the teams who need them. For HR, create dashboards that show trends over time: which themes are improving or worsening, which cohorts show higher negative sentiment, and which onboarding stages have the most high-severity issues. For line managers, provide filtered views showing feedback related to their teams (aggregated and anonymised where necessary).

A practical setup could be: HR sees a global "Onboarding Health" dashboard with filters for region, role family, and cohort, while managers receive a monthly email summarising the key patterns for their area. Use Gemini to generate the narrative commentary for these reports.

Example Gemini prompt for narrative dashboards:
You are assisting HR in communicating onboarding feedback insights
clearly to managers.

Based on the following aggregated data (JSON), write a concise summary
for managers including:
- top 3 positive themes
- top 3 issues with highest severity
- 3 concrete actions managers can take in the next month

Data:
{{aggregated_feedback_json}}

This approach turns raw analytics into understandable, action-oriented communication for non-technical stakeholders.

Set Up Automated Alerts for High-Severity or Repeating Issues

Gemini's severity and theme outputs can feed into simple alerting rules. For example, you might trigger an alert when more than five new hires in a cohort report "tools-and-access" issues with severity 4 or 5, or when negative sentiment about "manager-support" spikes in a specific location. These alerts can be pushed directly into HR ticketing systems or collaboration tools.

Configure a scheduled job that scans new Gemini outputs and applies rule-based checks. When conditions are met, the system can open an HR task, tag responsible HRBPs, and attach a Gemini-generated summary.

Example configuration logic (pseudo-code):
IF count(feedback where primary_theme = "tools-and-access" 
   AND severity >= 4 AND cohort_id = "2025-Q1") >= 5 THEN
   create_alert(
      type = "Access Issues Spike",
      owners = ["HR_Onboarding_Team"],
      summary = Gemini.summarise(feedback_subset),
      recommended_actions = Gemini.suggest_actions(feedback_subset)
   )

This ensures HR does not wait for quarterly reviews to fix structural blockers in the onboarding process.

Use Gemini to Draft Targeted Improvements and Communication

Beyond analysis, Gemini can help draft solutions: revised onboarding checklists, manager guidance, FAQ entries, or micro-learnings that directly address recurring issues. Feed Gemini with clustered feedback about a specific theme and ask it to propose updated onboarding steps or communication templates.

For instance, if many new hires report unclear role expectations in the first month, you can ask Gemini to propose a new "first 30 days" conversation guide for managers.

Example Gemini prompt for improvement content:
You are helping HR improve the onboarding process.

Here are 30 anonymised feedback comments related to "role-clarity"
from new hires in their first month:
{{role_clarity_feedback}}

Please:
1) Summarise the 5 most common root causes of confusion.
2) Propose a 30-day manager checklist to address these causes.
3) Draft a one-page "First 30 Days Expectations" guide that managers
   can share with new hires.

HR can then review, localise, and align this content with internal guidelines before rollout. This dramatically reduces the time from insight to tangible onboarding improvements.

Close the Loop with New Hires and Measure Impact

To make the system self-improving, use Gemini to help close the loop with employees and to measure the impact of changes. When you implement a new onboarding step or communication based on feedback, tag that change in your data model. Over the next cohorts, compare sentiment and severity for the related themes before and after the change.

Gemini can assist by generating follow-up survey questions focused on the updated area and by summarising whether sentiment has shifted. You can also use it to generate personalised follow-up messages acknowledging that feedback has led to change, which reinforces trust.

Example Gemini prompt for follow-up:
We recently changed our onboarding process based on prior feedback
about "tools-and-access" issues.

1) Draft 3 concise survey questions to evaluate whether the new
   process solved the main problems.
2) Draft a short message (max 120 words) we can send to recent
   new hires explaining what changed and thanking them for their
   honest feedback.

Over time, you should see measurable improvements such as a reduction in high-severity issues per cohort, higher onboarding satisfaction scores, and shorter time-to-productivity. Realistically, companies that implement these practices can expect within 3–6 months to reduce recurring onboarding issues by 20–40%, cut manual feedback analysis time by 60–80%, and give HR and managers a far clearer view of how onboarding is performing across roles and regions.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini is designed to work with unstructured and semi-structured data, which makes it a strong fit for onboarding feedback. You can feed it raw text from survey comments, email bodies, chat exports, or notes copied from HR systems. In a typical setup, a lightweight integration layer extracts the relevant text and metadata (role, location, date, channel) and sends it to Gemini via API.

Gemini then analyses the content for themes, sentiment, severity, and onboarding stage, returning structured outputs that can be stored in your HR analytics environment. Attachments like PDFs or docs can be converted to text before analysis, allowing you to include more formal feedback documents or reports in the same pipeline.

You do not need a large data science team to get started, but you do need a combination of HR ownership and basic technical integration skills. Typically, HR defines the goals, themes and governance rules, while an internal IT or data team (or a partner like Reruption) builds the data pipeline and connects Gemini.

The key roles are: an HR product owner for onboarding feedback, someone with integration/automation skills (to connect survey tools, email, collaboration platforms), and optionally an analytics or BI specialist to build dashboards. Reruption often works with existing IT teams to handle the Gemini prompts, API usage, and security configuration, so HR can focus on interpreting and acting on the insights.

For most organisations, the first meaningful results appear within 4–8 weeks if the scope is focused. In the first 1–2 weeks, you connect one or two main feedback sources (e.g., onboarding surveys and HR inbox) and design the initial Gemini prompts. Within a month, you can usually generate and review the first set of structured insights and basic dashboards.

Improvements in onboarding quality typically follow in the next 1–3 cohorts, once you begin acting on recurring issues that Gemini surfaces. Realistic timelines for measurable impact are 3–6 months for reductions in high-severity issues and manual analysis time, and 6–12 months for shifts in onboarding satisfaction, time-to-productivity, and early attrition.

The cost side mainly consists of three elements: Gemini usage (API or platform consumption), integration and setup work, and ongoing light maintenance. Compared to manual analysis, the investment is usually modest — especially if you already have basic integration infrastructure in place.

ROI comes from several angles: reduced HR analyst time spent reading and categorising comments, faster detection and resolution of onboarding issues that delay productivity, better manager support based on targeted insights, and ultimately lower early attrition and stronger employer brand. Even small improvements in retention or time-to-productivity can outweigh the running costs very quickly. For example, avoiding a handful of early replacement hires per year typically more than pays for a robust Gemini onboarding feedback pipeline.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur alongside your HR and IT teams, not as a distant advisor. We start with a focused AI PoC for 9.900€ to prove that Gemini can reliably analyse your real onboarding feedback, using your surveys, emails and chat data. In this PoC, we define the use case, design and test prompts, build a lightweight pipeline, and deliver a working prototype plus performance metrics and an implementation roadmap.

Beyond the PoC, we can help embed the solution operationally: integrating additional data sources, setting up dashboards and automated alerts, defining governance with your compliance stakeholders, and training HR and managers to work with AI-generated insights. Our Co-Preneur approach means we take entrepreneurial ownership for shipping a solution that actually improves your onboarding — not just producing slides about what AI could do.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media