The Challenge: Delayed Fraud and Anomaly Detection

In many finance organisations, fraudulent payments, fake vendors and policy breaches are discovered only during audits, month-end closes or quarterly reviews. By the time an anomaly appears on a report, the money has left the account, the perpetrator has moved on and recovery chances are slim. Finance teams are left explaining what went wrong instead of preventing it.

Traditional rule-based controls and static approval workflows are no longer enough. Fraudsters adapt quickly, routing transactions just below approval limits, splitting invoices, or exploiting new payment channels. ERP and T&E systems can only enforce the rules they know, and manual reviews can’t keep up with the volume and complexity of transactions, counterparties and payment patterns across entities and markets.

The business impact of not solving this is significant. Direct losses from fraudulent or erroneous payments accumulate, but the hidden costs are often higher: write-offs, legal exposure, audit findings, higher insurance premiums and reputational damage with banks and partners. Operationally, teams react by adding more manual checks and sign-offs, slowing down the business and making finance a bottleneck instead of a strategic risk partner. Competitors that manage to implement real-time anomaly detection gain an advantage in managing credit and counterparty risk, negotiating better terms and protecting margins.

While the challenge is real, it is solvable. Modern AI models can analyse full transaction histories, vendor behaviour and external signals in real time, spotting patterns that rigid rules never capture. At Reruption, we’ve helped organisations build AI-powered internal tools and analytics that move from static reports to live risk insights. In the rest of this page, you’ll find practical guidance on how to use Gemini together with your finance data stack to close the detection gap and make fraud and anomaly monitoring proactive, not reactive.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s perspective, the opportunity is to combine your existing data stack with Gemini for financial risk analytics and anomaly detection, instead of trying to bolt on yet another dashboard. Because we build real AI products inside organisations, we’ve seen how models like Gemini, integrated with BigQuery and financial data pipelines, can move fraud detection from rule-based afterthoughts to an embedded, continuous risk control that finance actually trusts and uses.

Think in End-to-End Risk Scenarios, Not Single Transactions

Most finance organisations start with the question “which single payments are suspicious?” and end up with noisy alerts. Strategically, it’s more powerful to define a small set of risk scenarios that matter: fake vendor onboarding, diverted bank accounts, duplicate or split invoices, collusion between employee and supplier, or unusual refund and credit note patterns. Then use Gemini to analyse sequences of events, not just isolated payments.

In practice, this means designing your data model and prompts around journeys: vendor created → bank details changed → first payment issued → series of high-value invoices. Gemini is strong at connecting these dots across tables in BigQuery and describing patterns in natural language. By aligning AI detection with clearly defined risk scenarios, you reduce alert fatigue and create outputs that risk and compliance teams can act on and explain to auditors.

Prepare Your Organisation for AI-Assisted Controls

Rolling out AI in finance risk management is not only about models; it’s about roles, responsibilities and comfort levels. Controllers, internal audit and shared service centres need clarity: Is Gemini recommending or deciding? Who reviews AI-based alerts? How do findings flow into existing incident and escalation processes?

Before scaling, define decision rights and communication: which types of anomalies can be auto-blocked pending review, which require human confirmation, and which are only highlighted for trend analysis. Train finance and risk staff on how Gemini works conceptually, what its limitations are, and how to challenge or refine its outputs. When teams understand that Gemini is an assistant embedded in their workflows – not a black box judge – adoption and quality of decisions increase.

Use Gemini to Augment, Not Replace, Existing Control Frameworks

Many companies are wary of AI in financial risk because they fear it will conflict with established SOX, ICS or audit frameworks. Strategically, Gemini should sit as a “smart radar” layer on top of your existing controls, not as a wholesale replacement. You keep the rule-based checks that regulators and auditors know, and add AI to detect what rules can’t foresee.

Design your first Gemini use cases to enrich existing controls: suggesting additional checks on high-risk vendors, prioritising items for sample-based audits, or explaining why a transaction pattern deviates from history. Over time, you can formalise the most reliable AI detections into documented key controls. This incremental approach keeps compliance comfortable while still giving you the benefits of modern anomaly detection.

Invest Early in Data Quality and Governance Around Risk Signals

Gemini’s value for fraud and anomaly detection in finance depends entirely on what you feed it. Strategically, it’s worth investing early in a clean, well-documented layer of payment, vendor, GL, and master data in BigQuery or your data warehouse. Inconsistent vendor IDs, missing cost centres, and free-text fields for critical attributes will directly reduce detection quality and increase false positives.

Work with finance, procurement, and IT to align on canonical sources for vendors, bank accounts, approval hierarchies and policy rules. Set up clear governance on who can change reference data and how those changes are logged. This not only improves AI performance; it also makes it easier to explain Gemini’s outputs to auditors because you can trace risk summaries back to clear, governed data elements.

Start with a Focused Pilot and Clear Risk KPIs

The most successful teams don’t try to “AI-ify” all of finance at once. They choose a contained domain – e.g. accounts payable for one region or T&E spend for one business unit – and define explicit risk KPIs: reduction in late-detected anomalies, time-to-detect, percentage of high-risk items reviewed before posting or payment.

Use Gemini in this pilot to generate anomaly scores, describe unusual clusters and create narratives for management. Measure how many of its alerts lead to confirmed issues, and how the process changes manual workload. Once you have evidence that Gemini reliably helps you catch issues earlier, it becomes much easier to secure sponsorship to extend the approach to other entities, ledgers and risk types.

The core takeaway is that Gemini can turn your financial risk management from periodic, rule-based checking into continuous, intelligence-driven monitoring when it’s embedded into your data stack and control framework with intention. At Reruption, we specialise in building exactly these kinds of AI-powered internal tools: connecting your ERP and BigQuery data, configuring Gemini for your risk scenarios, and validating that it actually reduces delayed fraud and anomaly detection. If you want to explore a concrete use case with low risk and high learning value, our AI PoC offering is a pragmatic way to see what Gemini can do on your real finance data before you commit to a full roll-out.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From EdTech to E-commerce: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Duolingo

EdTech

Duolingo, a leader in gamified language learning, faced key limitations in providing real-world conversational practice and in-depth feedback. While its bite-sized lessons built vocabulary and basics effectively, users craved immersive dialogues simulating everyday scenarios, which static exercises couldn't deliver . This gap hindered progression to fluency, as learners lacked opportunities for free-form speaking and nuanced grammar explanations without expensive human tutors. Additionally, content creation was a bottleneck. Human experts manually crafted lessons, slowing the rollout of new courses and languages amid rapid user growth. Scaling personalized experiences across 40+ languages demanded innovation to maintain engagement without proportional resource increases . These challenges risked user churn and limited monetization in a competitive EdTech market.

Lösung

Duolingo launched Duolingo Max in March 2023, a premium subscription powered by GPT-4, introducing Roleplay for dynamic conversations and Explain My Answer for contextual feedback . Roleplay simulates real-life interactions like ordering coffee or planning vacations with AI characters, adapting in real-time to user inputs. Explain My Answer provides detailed breakdowns of correct/incorrect responses, enhancing comprehension. Complementing this, Duolingo's Birdbrain LLM (fine-tuned on proprietary data) automates lesson generation, allowing experts to create content 10x faster . This hybrid human-AI approach ensured quality while scaling rapidly, integrated seamlessly into the app for all skill levels .

Ergebnisse

  • DAU Growth: +59% YoY to 34.1M (Q2 2024)
  • DAU Growth: +54% YoY to 31.4M (Q1 2024)
  • Revenue Growth: +41% YoY to $178.3M (Q2 2024)
  • Adjusted EBITDA Margin: 27.0% (Q2 2024)
  • Lesson Creation Speed: 10x faster with AI
  • User Self-Efficacy: Significant increase post-AI use (2025 study)
Read case study →

Goldman Sachs

Investment Banking

In the fast-paced investment banking sector, Goldman Sachs employees grapple with overwhelming volumes of repetitive tasks. Daily routines like processing hundreds of emails, writing and debugging complex financial code, and poring over lengthy documents for insights consume up to 40% of work time, diverting focus from high-value activities like client advisory and deal-making. Regulatory constraints exacerbate these issues, as sensitive financial data demands ironclad security, limiting off-the-shelf AI use. Traditional tools fail to scale with the need for rapid, accurate analysis amid market volatility, risking delays in response times and competitive edge.

Lösung

Goldman Sachs countered with a proprietary generative AI assistant, fine-tuned on internal datasets in a secure, private environment. This tool summarizes emails by extracting action items and priorities, generates production-ready code for models like risk assessments, and analyzes documents to highlight key trends and anomalies. Built from early 2023 proofs-of-concept, it leverages custom LLMs to ensure compliance and accuracy, enabling natural language interactions without external data risks. The firm prioritized employee augmentation over replacement, training staff for optimal use.

Ergebnisse

  • Rollout Scale: 10,000 employees in 2024
  • Timeline: PoCs 2023; initial rollout 2024; firmwide 2025
  • Productivity Boost: Routine tasks streamlined, est. 25-40% time savings on emails/coding/docs
  • Adoption: Rapid uptake across tech and front-office teams
  • Strategic Impact: Core to 10-year AI playbook for structural gains
Read case study →

BP

Energy

BP, a global energy leader in oil, gas, and renewables, grappled with high energy costs during peak periods across its extensive assets. Volatile grid demands and price spikes during high-consumption times strained operations, exacerbating inefficiencies in energy production and consumption. Integrating intermittent renewable sources added forecasting challenges, while traditional management failed to dynamically respond to real-time market signals, leading to substantial financial losses and grid instability risks . Compounding this, BP's diverse portfolio—from offshore platforms to data-heavy exploration—faced data silos and legacy systems ill-equipped for predictive analytics. Peak energy expenses not only eroded margins but hindered the transition to sustainable operations amid rising regulatory pressures for emissions reduction. The company needed a solution to shift loads intelligently and monetize flexibility in energy markets .

Lösung

To tackle these issues, BP acquired Open Energi in 2021, gaining access to its flagship Plato AI platform, which employs machine learning for predictive analytics and real-time optimization. Plato analyzes vast datasets from assets, weather, and grid signals to forecast peaks and automate demand response, shifting non-critical loads to off-peak times while participating in frequency response services . Integrated into BP's operations, the AI enables dynamic containment and flexibility markets, optimizing consumption without disrupting production. Combined with BP's internal AI for exploration and simulation, it provides end-to-end visibility, reducing reliance on fossil fuels during peaks and enhancing renewable integration . This acquisition marked a strategic pivot, blending Open Energi's demand-side expertise with BP's supply-side scale.

Ergebnisse

  • $10 million in annual energy savings
  • 80+ MW of energy assets under flexible management
  • Strongest oil exploration performance in years via AI
  • Material boost in electricity demand optimization
  • Reduced peak grid costs through dynamic response
  • Enhanced asset efficiency across oil, gas, renewables
Read case study →

Amazon

Retail

In the vast e-commerce landscape, online shoppers face significant hurdles in product discovery and decision-making. With millions of products available, customers often struggle to find items matching their specific needs, compare options, or get quick answers to nuanced questions about features, compatibility, and usage. Traditional search bars and static listings fall short, leading to shopping cart abandonment rates as high as 70% industry-wide and prolonged decision times that frustrate users. Amazon, serving over 300 million active customers, encountered amplified challenges during peak events like Prime Day, where query volumes spiked dramatically. Shoppers demanded personalized, conversational assistance akin to in-store help, but scaling human support was impossible. Issues included handling complex, multi-turn queries, integrating real-time inventory and pricing data, and ensuring recommendations complied with safety and accuracy standards amid a $500B+ catalog.

Lösung

Amazon developed Rufus, a generative AI-powered conversational shopping assistant embedded in the Amazon Shopping app and desktop. Rufus leverages a custom-built large language model (LLM) fine-tuned on Amazon's product catalog, customer reviews, and web data, enabling natural, multi-turn conversations to answer questions, compare products, and provide tailored recommendations. Powered by Amazon Bedrock for scalability and AWS Trainium/Inferentia chips for efficient inference, Rufus scales to millions of sessions without latency issues. It incorporates agentic capabilities for tasks like cart addition, price tracking, and deal hunting, overcoming prior limitations in personalization by accessing user history and preferences securely. Implementation involved iterative testing, starting with beta in February 2024, expanding to all US users by September, and global rollouts, addressing hallucination risks through grounding techniques and human-in-loop safeguards.

Ergebnisse

  • 60% higher purchase completion rate for Rufus users
  • $10B projected additional sales from Rufus
  • 250M+ customers used Rufus in 2025
  • Monthly active users up 140% YoY
  • Interactions surged 210% YoY
  • Black Friday sales sessions +100% with Rufus
  • 149% jump in Rufus users recently
Read case study →

Ford Motor Company

Manufacturing

In Ford's automotive manufacturing plants, vehicle body sanding and painting represented a major bottleneck. These labor-intensive tasks required workers to manually sand car bodies, a process prone to inconsistencies, fatigue, and ergonomic injuries due to repetitive motions over hours . Traditional robotic systems struggled with the variability in body panels, curvatures, and material differences, limiting full automation in legacy 'brownfield' facilities . Additionally, achieving consistent surface quality for painting was critical, as defects could lead to rework, delays, and increased costs. With rising demand for electric vehicles (EVs) and production scaling, Ford needed to modernize without massive CapEx or disrupting ongoing operations, while prioritizing workforce safety and upskilling . The challenge was to integrate scalable automation that collaborated with humans seamlessly.

Lösung

Ford addressed this by deploying AI-guided collaborative robots (cobots) equipped with machine vision and automation algorithms. In the body shop, six cobots use cameras and AI to scan car bodies in real-time, detecting surfaces, defects, and contours with high precision . These systems employ computer vision models for 3D mapping and path planning, allowing cobots to adapt dynamically without reprogramming . The solution emphasized a workforce-first brownfield strategy, starting with pilot deployments in Michigan plants. Cobots handle sanding autonomously while humans oversee quality, reducing injury risks. Partnerships with robotics firms and in-house AI development enabled low-code inspection tools for easy scaling .

Ergebnisse

  • Sanding time: 35 seconds per full car body (vs. hours manually)
  • Productivity boost: 4x faster assembly processes
  • Injury reduction: 70% fewer ergonomic strains in cobot zones
  • Consistency improvement: 95% defect-free surfaces post-sanding
  • Deployment scale: 6 cobots operational, expanding to 50+ units
  • ROI timeline: Payback in 12-18 months per plant
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Connect Gemini to a Curated Finance Risk View in BigQuery

Before asking Gemini to surface anomalies, create a curated “risk view” in BigQuery that combines key finance tables: payments, invoices, vendors, bank accounts, cost centres, approval logs and, if available, user activity logs from your ERP or T&E system. Include derived fields such as payment velocity, typical invoice amounts by vendor, first/last transaction dates and changes in bank details.

With that in place, you can use Gemini’s BigQuery integration to generate and refine SQL that pulls candidate anomalies. For example, you might ask Gemini to generate a query for vendors with sudden jumps in average invoice size or for payments split just under approval thresholds. This makes anomaly hunting systematic instead of ad hoc.

Example Gemini instruction for BigQuery:
"You are a financial risk analyst. Generate a BigQuery SQL query on table finance_risk_view
that finds vendors whose average invoice amount in the last 30 days is >3x their 180-day average,
for invoices over EUR 5,000, and group by vendor with total exposure. Return vendor_id,
vendor_name, avg_30d, avg_180d, exposure_30d."

Expected outcome: A stable set of “risk views” and reusable SQL templates that Gemini can adapt quickly as your finance team refines its fraud scenarios.

Use Gemini to Design and Maintain Anomaly Rules and Thresholds

Most control frameworks rely on hard-coded rules. Gemini can help you design, simulate and maintain more nuanced anomaly rules based on historical patterns. Start by giving Gemini samples of past fraud or error cases (with sensitive data masked) and typical “normal” transactions, then ask it to propose candidate rules and thresholds.

Example Gemini prompt:
"You are helping design fraud detection rules for accounts payable.
Here is a description of 20 historic fraud/exception cases and 50 normal cases (schema, fields, values)...
1) Summarise the distinct patterns that separate fraud from normal.
2) Propose 5-10 concrete detection rules (with thresholds) that can be implemented in SQL.
3) For each rule, estimate likely false positive drivers and how to mitigate them."

Implement the best rules as queries or scheduled jobs in BigQuery, and periodically feed back detection results to Gemini to refine them. This creates a living control set that evolves with your business instead of decaying over time.

Embed Gemini-Generated Risk Summaries into Daily Finance Workflows

An alert that no one reads is worthless. Use Gemini to turn raw anomalies into actionable risk narratives that slot into existing workflows: daily payment runs, vendor reviews, month-end close meetings. For example, trigger a Cloud Function or workflow that runs anomaly queries before payment release and sends a concise summary to the responsible finance manager or shared service team.

Example narrative configuration prompt:
"You are a finance risk assistant. For the anomalies in the attached table (fields: vendor, amount,
reason_code, historical_pattern, risk_score), produce a concise briefing for the AP manager.
Structure:
- Top 5 vendors to review before today's payment run
- Short explanation (2-3 sentences) for why each is unusual
- Suggested next action (e.g., hold payment, confirm master data, escalate to internal audit)
Use clear, non-technical language."

Expected outcome: Finance managers receive a one-page, plain-language Gemini summary each morning, enabling them to hold or review critical items before cash leaves the company.

Create a Fraud & Anomaly Monitoring Dashboard with Gemini Commentary

Combine BI tools (e.g. Looker, Data Studio, Power BI) with Gemini to build a fraud and anomaly monitoring dashboard that updates daily. The BI layer shows KPIs such as number of anomalies flagged, confirmed issues, loss amounts avoided and time-to-detect. Gemini adds auto-generated commentary that explains trends and clusters at a glance.

Example Gemini commentary prompt:
"You are writing a monthly fraud risk commentary for the CFO.
Here is structured data from our anomaly dashboard (include extracts or a summary).
Produce:
- 3 key takeaways on fraud/anomaly trends vs last month
- 2 emerging risk patterns and possible root causes
- 3 recommended control or process improvements, prioritised by impact.
Keep it under 400 words and suitable for board-level reporting."

Expected outcome: A single source of truth for fraud and anomaly risk, with commentary that non-technical leaders can understand and act on, reducing time spent manually compiling management reports.

Integrate Gemini into Case Management and Audit Trails

For each anomaly Gemini helps detect, you should be able to answer later: what triggered it, who reviewed it and what the outcome was. Integrate Gemini’s outputs with your existing case management or ticketing system (ServiceNow, Jira, internal tools) so that every high-risk item becomes a trackable case with an audit trail.

Use Gemini to pre-fill case details, suggest categorisations and recommend next steps. Over time, feed resolved case data back into your anomaly detection process: which alert types were consistently false positives, which rules or prompts need tightening, and where new patterns are emerging that weren’t covered by previous scenarios.

Example internal guidance for Gemini case notes:
"When creating a case note, summarise:
- Why this transaction/vendor was flagged (1-2 sentences)
- Relevant history (last 6 months of payments or changes)
- Suggested investigation steps (max 5 bullets)
Write clearly so that internal audit can understand context without querying raw data."

Expected outcome: A closed-loop process where Gemini not only detects anomalies, but also helps structure investigations and continuously improves detection quality based on real outcomes.

Define Concrete KPIs and Review Cadences for AI-Based Detection

To keep your Gemini-based fraud detection system effective and credible, define explicit performance indicators and review cadences. Start with practical metrics: percentage of payment volume screened by AI before release, number of confirmed issues detected pre-payment vs post-payment, false positive rate, and average time from anomaly flag to resolution.

Set monthly or quarterly review sessions where finance, risk, and data teams examine these KPIs, sample alert cases, and adjust queries, thresholds and Gemini prompts accordingly. Document improvements and decisions for auditability. Over time, you should realistically target outcomes such as a 30–50% reduction in late-detected anomalies in the selected scope, and a meaningful decrease in manual review hours for low-risk items as AI prioritisation improves.

Expected outcome: A measurable, auditable improvement in fraud and anomaly detection, with realistic gains in early detection and efficiency rather than overpromised “full automation.”

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini helps by analysing your transaction, vendor and master data across systems, instead of relying only on static rules. Connected to BigQuery or another warehouse, it can generate and run anomaly-focused SQL, highlight unusual clusters of payments or vendor behaviour, and summarise risk patterns in plain language for finance teams.

Instead of discovering issues at month-end or during audits, you can run Gemini-driven checks daily or before each payment run, so suspicious items are flagged while you can still stop or investigate them.

You don’t need a perfect data warehouse, but you do need accessible finance data (e.g. from ERP, AP, T&E, banking) in a structured form, ideally in BigQuery or another queryable store. A basic curated view that links payments, invoices, vendors and bank accounts is usually enough for a first pilot.

On the people side, you’ll need a small cross-functional team: finance or risk owners who understand the control framework, and data/engineering support to connect systems and operationalise queries. Reruption typically helps clients set up this initial data and workflow layer so that Gemini can add value within weeks, not months.

For a focused scope (for example, accounts payable in one region or a subset of vendors), you can usually see meaningful results within 4–8 weeks. The first 1–2 weeks are typically spent scoping risk scenarios, preparing data views and connecting Gemini. The following weeks focus on iterating anomaly queries, reviewing alerts with finance teams and refining thresholds.

Our AI PoC format at Reruption is specifically designed to validate technical feasibility and business impact in a short time frame. Within the PoC, clients usually get a working prototype that runs on real data and produces actionable alerts they can compare against past incidents.

ROI depends on your transaction volume, current control setup and historical incident rates, but there are three common value levers. First, avoided losses: catching even a few high-value fraudulent or erroneous payments before execution can pay back the investment quickly. Second, efficiency gains: AI can pre-filter and prioritise items, reducing manual review time for low-risk transactions. Third, better risk posture: earlier detection can improve audit outcomes, negotiations with insurers and counterparties, and reduce reputational risk.

In practice, companies aiming for realistic outcomes focus on metrics such as a significant reduction in late-detected anomalies within the pilot scope and a measurable shift of reviews from post-payment to pre-payment, rather than expecting full automation or 100% detection.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur with your finance, risk and IT teams. We don’t stop at slideware; we embed ourselves to design the use case, connect your ERP and data pipelines, and build a working Gemini-based prototype that runs on your real data. Our AI PoC offering (9,900€) is structured to answer one concrete question: does this Gemini-based anomaly detection use case work technically and deliver value in your context?

Within the PoC and beyond, we help you define risk scenarios, create BigQuery risk views, configure Gemini prompts and workflows, and plan the path to production with security, compliance and audit requirements in mind. The goal is to move you from idea to a live AI control that actually reduces delayed fraud and anomalies – and to do it quickly enough that it impacts this year’s numbers, not the next strategic cycle.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media