The Challenge: Channel-Hopping Customers

When customers don’t get a fast, clear answer in one support channel, they simply try again somewhere else. The same person might email support, start a website chat, and then call your hotline about the very same issue. Each touchpoint often becomes a separate ticket, handled by different agents, in different tools. The result: your team fights the illusion of high volume instead of real complexity.

Traditional approaches – adding more agents, tightening SLAs, or publishing static FAQs – don’t solve this pattern anymore. Customers expect instant, consistent answers wherever they show up, at any time of day. Legacy knowledge bases, unconnected chatbots, and siloed phone IVR scripts all tell slightly different stories. Even when the content is correct, it’s rarely personalized to the customer’s exact context or phrased in a way that prevents them from “just checking” in another channel.

The impact on the business is significant. Channel-hopping inflates ticket volume by 20–40% in many organisations, distorts KPIs, and makes workforce planning harder. Agents waste time deduplicating and reconciling cases instead of solving real problems. Customers receive contradictory or repetitive answers, which erodes trust and increases churn risk. At scale, this leads to higher cost-per-contact, slower resolution times, and a competitive disadvantage compared to companies that deliver a smooth, unified support experience.

The good news: this is a solvable problem. By using Gemini as a unified intelligence layer across your website, app, and phone flows, you can serve the same high-quality answer everywhere and close most simple requests before they reach an agent. At Reruption, we’ve helped organisations build AI-powered assistants, automate repetitive support journeys, and reduce avoidable contacts. In the rest of this page, you’ll find practical guidance on how to apply Gemini to your own customer service setup and finally get channel-hopping under control.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI-powered customer service solutions and intelligent chatbots, we’ve seen that channel-hopping is rarely a staffing issue – it’s an experience and consistency issue. Gemini is particularly well suited as a unified brain behind your self-service, chat, and IVR touchpoints because it can consume the same knowledge base and respond in channel-appropriate ways. Below is how we recommend leaders think about using Gemini to reduce channel-hopping and deflect support volume in a sustainable way.

Think in Journeys, Not Channels

Most organisations still design support around internal structures: a ticketing queue here, a chat widget there, an IVR tree on top. To use Gemini for channel-hopping customers effectively, you need to flip the view and map the full journey of a typical issue: search on the website, attempt in-app help, web chat, then phone. This reveals where customers drop out, repeat themselves, or receive conflicting messages.

Once you understand these journeys, you can position Gemini as the single answering layer that accompanies the customer across touchpoints. Strategically, this means your customer service leadership, product team, and IT agree on a shared outcome (e.g. “first issue resolution within one interaction”) rather than channel-specific KPIs (e.g. “reduce phone AHT”). It also means prioritising the journeys that drive the most duplicate tickets instead of trying to cover every possible question from day one.

Use a Single Source of Truth for All AI Answers

The biggest driver of channel-hopping is inconsistency: the FAQ says one thing, the chatbot another, and the phone agent something else. To break this, treat Gemini as an orchestrator sitting on top of a single, governed knowledge base. This can be a combination of your help centre, policy documents, and product data – but it must be curated, versioned, and owned.

Strategically, assign a cross-functional content owner (often within customer service) who is accountable for answer quality across all channels. Gemini then references exactly this source for email drafts, chat answers, and IVR explanations. This reduces legal and compliance risk and makes updates (e.g. new pricing, policy changes) propagate instantly everywhere, removing a major reason for customers to double-check information through other channels.

Design for Deflection Without Sacrificing Trust

Deflecting support volume is valuable only if it maintains or improves the customer’s trust. Over-aggressive bots that block access to humans will simply drive customers to another channel or churn. When planning Gemini-powered self-service, define clear guardrails: which topics should be fully auto-resolved, which require guided self-service, and which should be quickly escalated to a human.

At a strategic level, set expectations transparently. Let customers know they are talking to an AI assistant, show how to reach a person when necessary, and ensure Gemini summarises the conversation for the agent so the customer never has to repeat themselves. This builds confidence in the AI while still safeguarding your brand experience.

Align Customer Service, IT, and Compliance Early

Introducing Gemini into customer service workflows touches multiple teams: service operations, IT, data security, and often legal. If these stakeholders only meet at go-live, you’ll end up with delays, unclear responsibilities, and half-implemented capabilities. Instead, treat Gemini adoption as a cross-functional initiative with a declared sponsor and clear decision rights.

From the outset, align on data usage (what Gemini can see), logging and monitoring requirements, and escalation rules. This creates the conditions for safe experimentation: your service team can iterate on prompts and workflows; IT can ensure performance and integration stability; compliance can sign off on how customer data is processed. The result is faster learning cycles and less friction when you move from pilot to scale.

Measure Duplicates and Channel-Hopping Explicitly

Many customer service dashboards focus on high-level indicators like total ticket volume or average handle time. To know whether Gemini actually reduces channel-hopping, you need specific metrics: duplicate ticket rate per issue type, number of distinct channels touched per unique customer problem, and time to first effective answer (not just first response).

Strategically, define these metrics before you deploy Gemini so you have a credible baseline. Then instrument your systems to link interactions using identifiers such as customer ID, email, or session tokens. This lets you track how often a query that starts via a Gemini chatbot ends up as a phone call later. By monitoring this over time, you can tune content, prompts, and workflows where deflection is not yet strong enough and demonstrate impact to the wider organisation with evidence rather than anecdotes.

Used thoughtfully, Gemini can become the consistent brain behind all your support channels, eliminating the gaps and contradictions that drive customers to keep hopping between email, chat, and phone. By aligning journeys, knowledge, and metrics, you transform AI from a standalone chatbot into a true volume-deflection engine. Reruption brings the combination of AI engineering depth and hands-on customer service experience to design and implement these Gemini-powered workflows end to end; if you want to test what this looks like in your environment, our AI PoC is a fast, low-risk way to move from concept to a working prototype.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Logistics to Telecommunications: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

DHL

Logistics

DHL, a global logistics giant, faced significant challenges from vehicle breakdowns and suboptimal maintenance schedules. Unpredictable failures in its vast fleet of delivery vehicles led to frequent delivery delays, increased operational costs, and frustrated customers. Traditional reactive maintenance—fixing issues only after they occurred—resulted in excessive downtime, with vehicles sidelined for hours or days, disrupting supply chains worldwide. Inefficiencies were compounded by varying fleet conditions across regions, making scheduled maintenance inefficient and wasteful, often over-maintaining healthy vehicles while under-maintaining others at risk. These issues not only inflated maintenance costs by up to 20% in some segments but also eroded customer trust through unreliable deliveries. With rising e-commerce demands, DHL needed a proactive approach to predict failures before they happened, minimizing disruptions in a highly competitive logistics industry.

Lösung

DHL implemented a predictive maintenance system leveraging IoT sensors installed on vehicles to collect real-time data on engine performance, tire wear, brakes, and more. This data feeds into machine learning models that analyze patterns, predict potential breakdowns, and recommend optimal maintenance timing. The AI solution integrates with DHL's existing fleet management systems, using algorithms like random forests and neural networks for anomaly detection and failure forecasting. Overcoming data silos and integration challenges, DHL partnered with tech providers to deploy edge computing for faster processing. Pilot programs in key hubs expanded globally, shifting from time-based to condition-based maintenance, ensuring resources focus on high-risk assets.

Ergebnisse

  • Vehicle downtime reduced by 15%
  • Maintenance costs lowered by 10%
  • Unplanned breakdowns decreased by 25%
  • On-time delivery rate improved by 12%
  • Fleet availability increased by 20%
  • Overall operational efficiency up 18%
Read case study →

Goldman Sachs

Investment Banking

In the fast-paced investment banking sector, Goldman Sachs employees grapple with overwhelming volumes of repetitive tasks. Daily routines like processing hundreds of emails, writing and debugging complex financial code, and poring over lengthy documents for insights consume up to 40% of work time, diverting focus from high-value activities like client advisory and deal-making. Regulatory constraints exacerbate these issues, as sensitive financial data demands ironclad security, limiting off-the-shelf AI use. Traditional tools fail to scale with the need for rapid, accurate analysis amid market volatility, risking delays in response times and competitive edge.

Lösung

Goldman Sachs countered with a proprietary generative AI assistant, fine-tuned on internal datasets in a secure, private environment. This tool summarizes emails by extracting action items and priorities, generates production-ready code for models like risk assessments, and analyzes documents to highlight key trends and anomalies. Built from early 2023 proofs-of-concept, it leverages custom LLMs to ensure compliance and accuracy, enabling natural language interactions without external data risks. The firm prioritized employee augmentation over replacement, training staff for optimal use.

Ergebnisse

  • Rollout Scale: 10,000 employees in 2024
  • Timeline: PoCs 2023; initial rollout 2024; firmwide 2025
  • Productivity Boost: Routine tasks streamlined, est. 25-40% time savings on emails/coding/docs
  • Adoption: Rapid uptake across tech and front-office teams
  • Strategic Impact: Core to 10-year AI playbook for structural gains
Read case study →

John Deere

Agriculture

In conventional agriculture, farmers rely on blanket spraying of herbicides across entire fields, leading to significant waste. This approach applies chemicals indiscriminately to crops and weeds alike, resulting in high costs for inputs—herbicides can account for 10-20% of variable farming expenses—and environmental harm through soil contamination, water runoff, and accelerated weed resistance . Globally, weeds cause up to 34% yield losses, but overuse of herbicides exacerbates resistance in over 500 species, threatening food security . For row crops like cotton, corn, and soybeans, distinguishing weeds from crops is particularly challenging due to visual similarities, varying field conditions (light, dust, speed), and the need for real-time decisions at 15 mph spraying speeds. Labor shortages and rising chemical prices in 2025 further pressured farmers, with U.S. herbicide costs exceeding $6B annually . Traditional methods failed to balance efficacy, cost, and sustainability.

Lösung

See & Spray revolutionizes weed control by integrating high-resolution cameras, AI-powered computer vision, and precision nozzles on sprayers. The system captures images every few inches, uses object detection models to identify weeds (over 77 species) versus crops in milliseconds, and activates sprays only on targets—reducing blanket application . John Deere acquired Blue River Technology in 2017 to accelerate development, training models on millions of annotated images for robust performance across conditions. Available in Premium (high-density) and Select (affordable retrofit) versions, it integrates with existing John Deere equipment via edge computing for real-time inference without cloud dependency . This robotic precision minimizes drift and overlap, aligning with sustainability goals.

Ergebnisse

  • 5 million acres treated in 2025
  • 31 million gallons of herbicide mix saved
  • Nearly 50% reduction in non-residual herbicide use
  • 77+ weed species detected accurately
  • Up to 90% less chemical in clean crop areas
  • ROI within 1-2 seasons for adopters
Read case study →

Kaiser Permanente

Healthcare

In hospital settings, adult patients on general wards often experience clinical deterioration without adequate warning, leading to emergency transfers to intensive care, increased mortality, and preventable readmissions. Kaiser Permanente Northern California faced this issue across its network, where subtle changes in vital signs and lab results went unnoticed amid high patient volumes and busy clinician workflows. This resulted in elevated adverse outcomes, including higher-than-necessary death rates and 30-day readmissions . Traditional early warning scores like MEWS (Modified Early Warning Score) were limited by manual scoring and poor predictive accuracy for deterioration within 12 hours, failing to leverage the full potential of electronic health record (EHR) data. The challenge was compounded by alert fatigue from less precise systems and the need for a scalable solution across 21 hospitals serving millions .

Lösung

Kaiser Permanente developed the Advance Alert Monitor (AAM), an AI-powered early warning system using predictive analytics to analyze real-time EHR data—including vital signs, labs, and demographics—to identify patients at high risk of deterioration within the next 12 hours. The model generates a risk score and automated alerts integrated into clinicians' workflows, prompting timely interventions like physician reviews or rapid response teams . Implemented since 2013 in Northern California, AAM employs machine learning algorithms trained on historical data to outperform traditional scores, with explainable predictions to build clinician trust. It was rolled out hospital-wide, addressing integration challenges through Epic EHR compatibility and clinician training to minimize fatigue .

Ergebnisse

  • 16% lower mortality rate in AAM intervention cohort
  • 500+ deaths prevented annually across network
  • 10% reduction in 30-day readmissions
  • Identifies deterioration risk within 12 hours with high reliability
  • Deployed in 21 Northern California hospitals
Read case study →

HSBC

Banking

As a global banking titan handling trillions in annual transactions, HSBC grappled with escalating fraud and money laundering risks. Traditional systems struggled to process over 1 billion transactions monthly, generating excessive false positives that burdened compliance teams, slowed operations, and increased costs. Ensuring real-time detection while minimizing disruptions to legitimate customers was critical, alongside strict regulatory compliance in diverse markets. Customer service faced high volumes of inquiries requiring 24/7 multilingual support, straining resources. Simultaneously, HSBC sought to pioneer generative AI research for innovation in personalization and automation, but challenges included ethical deployment, human oversight for advancing AI, data privacy, and integration across legacy systems without compromising security. Scaling these solutions globally demanded robust governance to maintain trust and adhere to evolving regulations.

Lösung

HSBC tackled fraud with machine learning models powered by Google Cloud's Transaction Monitoring 360, enabling AI to detect anomalies and financial crime patterns in real-time across vast datasets. This shifted from rigid rules to dynamic, adaptive learning. For customer service, NLP-driven chatbots were rolled out to handle routine queries, provide instant responses, and escalate complex issues, enhancing accessibility worldwide. In parallel, HSBC advanced generative AI through internal research, sandboxes, and a landmark multi-year partnership with Mistral AI (announced December 2024), integrating tools for document analysis, translation, fraud enhancement, automation, and client-facing innovations—all under ethical frameworks with human oversight.

Ergebnisse

  • Screens over 1 billion transactions monthly for financial crime
  • Significant reduction in false positives and manual reviews (up to 60-90% in models)
  • Hundreds of AI use cases deployed across global operations
  • Multi-year Mistral AI partnership (Dec 2024) to accelerate genAI productivity
  • Enhanced real-time fraud alerts, reducing compliance workload
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Unify Your Knowledge Base Before You Connect Gemini

Before wiring Gemini into every customer touchpoint, consolidate the sources it will use to answer questions. Identify your primary help centre, internal FAQs, policy documents, and product manuals, then rationalise them into a structured, up-to-date support knowledge base. Remove duplicates, mark deprecated content, and add missing coverage for your top 20 contact reasons.

Next, configure Gemini to index or retrieve from this unified source only. If you are using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), define the document collections (e.g. billing, orders, technical setup) and add metadata tags such as language, region, product line, and validity dates. This ensures that whether a customer talks to a web chatbot, in-app assistant, or automated email responder, Gemini always draws from the same canonical truth.

Embed Gemini in Web Chat to Answer and Contain Simple Requests

Web chat is often the first interaction for digital customers – and a common origin point for channel-hopping. Embed a Gemini-powered virtual agent into your chat widget with the goal of solving or meaningfully progressing common questions in the first interaction. Start with your highest-frequency, low-complexity topics: password resets, order tracking, invoice copies, appointment rescheduling, or basic troubleshooting.

Implement guardrails by configuring intent detection and handover triggers (e.g. when the customer explicitly requests a human or uses certain keywords like “complaint” or “cancellation”). When escalation is needed, have Gemini summarise the entire conversation for the agent and pass it through your CRM so the customer doesn’t need to repeat anything – a key step to preventing them from jumping to another channel out of frustration.

Example Gemini system prompt for chat:
You are a customer service assistant for [Company].
- Answer only based on the provided knowledge base snippets.
- If information is missing, ask one clarifying question, then offer to connect to a human agent.
- Always confirm the customer's main goal in your first response.
- If you resolve the issue, clearly state the outcome and recap next steps.
- If escalating, produce a short summary for the agent including:
  - Customer goal
  - Key details (order ID, product, dates)
  - Steps already taken in chat
  - Customer sentiment (positive/neutral/negative)

Use Gemini to Draft Consistent Email Responses From the Same Knowledge

Email queues are where duplicate tickets usually pile up unnoticed. Integrate Gemini with your ticketing system so it can read the inbound email, pull relevant snippets from the same central knowledge base, and draft a reply for the agent to review. This keeps tone, structure, and content consistent with what your chatbot or IVR communicates.

Configure templates for your main contact reasons and let Gemini fill in the details (order numbers, product names, deadlines) based on the ticket metadata. Use a short system prompt to enforce policy alignment and to prevent Gemini from making commitments outside your rules.

Example Gemini system prompt for email drafting:
You write email replies for the customer service team.
- Use the same policies and information as the support chatbot.
- Be concise, clear, and friendly. Avoid jargon.
- Do not invent policies, prices, or deadlines.
- If the request cannot be fully resolved by email, propose the next concrete step.
Input:
- Customer email
- Relevant knowledge base snippets
- Ticket metadata (name, order ID, product)

Augment IVR and Phone Support With Gemini Summaries

Phone remains a critical channel, especially for high-value or urgent issues, but it is also a common last resort when self-service fails. While Gemini cannot answer a phone call directly, you can integrate it into your IVR flows and agent desktop. For example, capture short descriptions from the caller via speech-to-text in IVR, then let Gemini classify intent and suggest knowledge-based answers that the IVR can play back.

For calls that reach agents, use Gemini to generate real-time summaries and recommended responses based on the conversation transcript. This both reduces after-call work and ensures that if the customer follows up later via email or chat, your systems have a consistent, AI-generated summary that other channels can pick up on – dramatically lowering the risk of contradictory answers.

Example Gemini prompt for call summarisation:
You summarise customer service calls.
Produce:
- 2-3 sentence summary of the issue
- Key data points (IDs, dates, products) as a bullet list
- Root cause as one short sentence
- Next steps and owner (customer vs. company)
The summary should be understandable by any support agent who might handle a follow-up in email or chat.

Link Interactions to Prevent Duplicate Tickets

To tackle channel-hopping directly, configure your systems so Gemini can help detect when a new interaction is likely a duplicate of an existing case. Use shared identifiers (email, phone number, customer ID, or authenticated app session) and let Gemini compare the new message with open tickets. If similarity is high, propose linking it to the existing ticket instead of opening a fresh one.

On the customer side, instruct your Gemini chatbot to acknowledge when a case already exists: “I can see we’re already working on your issue about [summary]. Here’s the latest status…” This alone can stop many customers from “just checking” via another route. On the agent side, surface a banner in the ticket interface: “Possible duplicate of Ticket #12345 – same customer, similar description,” with a Gemini-generated rationale.

Establish KPIs and Feedback Loops for Continuous Tuning

Once Gemini is live across channels, treat it as a product, not a one-off deployment. Define KPIs such as deflection rate for top 10 intents, duplicate ticket rate per issue type, average number of channels per resolved issue, and customer satisfaction for AI-handled interactions. Dashboards should make it easy for operations leads to see which journeys are working well and which still trigger channel-hopping.

Implement a lightweight feedback loop: allow agents to flag AI suggestions as helpful or unhelpful, and let customers rate AI chat conversations. Regularly review low-performing intents and update your knowledge base, prompts, or workflows accordingly. Over time, this tuning can realistically deliver 15–30% fewer duplicate tickets, shorter resolution times for simple issues, and a noticeable improvement in perceived responsiveness – without adding headcount.

Expected outcome: By unifying knowledge, embedding Gemini in chat, email, and phone workflows, and actively linking related interactions, organisations typically see a reduction in duplicate tickets and channel-hopping within 4–8 weeks of focused implementation, freeing agents to handle complex cases and improving overall customer satisfaction.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini reduces channel-hopping by ensuring that customers receive the same accurate answer regardless of where they show up. It uses one governed knowledge base to power your chatbot, email drafts, and IVR suggestions, so the information in each channel is aligned.

When a customer recontacts you, Gemini can also recognise the context based on identifiers (email, customer ID, phone number) and summarise previous interactions. That means the chatbot can say “Here’s the latest on your existing case” instead of starting from zero, and agents can continue the story instead of creating a new ticket. This combination of consistent answers and continuity is what discourages customers from trying multiple channels for the same issue.

You don’t need a large data science team, but you do need three capabilities: a customer service owner who knows your main contact reasons, an engineering or IT resource to integrate Gemini with your chat, email, and IVR systems, and someone responsible for maintaining the knowledge base.

Reruption typically works with existing service leaders and a small internal IT team. We handle the AI configuration, prompt design, and integration patterns, while your team provides domain knowledge, policies, and access to systems like your CRM or ticketing platform. Over time, we help your people learn how to adjust prompts and content so they can run and evolve the solution themselves.

For a focused scope (e.g. the top 10–20 reasons customers contact you), you can see measurable impact from Gemini-powered support deflection in 4–8 weeks. The first few weeks are usually spent unifying the knowledge base, connecting Gemini to one or two channels, and tuning prompts for your specific tone and policies.

Once live, you’ll see early indicators in chat containment rates, fewer new tickets for those intents, and fewer customers using multiple channels for the same issue. Full optimisation across email, chat, and phone can take several months, but you don’t need to wait that long to benefit – a well-designed pilot in a single channel already reveals how much duplicate volume you can realistically remove.

The cost of a Gemini-based customer service solution has three components: usage costs for the Gemini model itself, integration and engineering work, and ongoing knowledge/content governance. For most organisations, model usage is relatively small compared to the cost of agent time; the main investment is in getting the workflows and integrations right.

In terms of ROI, companies dealing with significant channel-hopping can often reduce duplicate tickets by 15–30% in the first phase and shorten resolution times for simple issues. That translates directly into fewer contacts per customer problem, lower cost per resolved issue, and more capacity for agents to handle complex or high-value cases. When designed correctly, the payback period is typically measured in months rather than years.

Reruption specialises in building AI solutions for customer service that move beyond slideware into real, shipped products. With our AI PoC offering (9,900€), we can validate within a short timeframe whether Gemini can effectively deflect volume and reduce channel-hopping in your specific environment, using your data and systems.

From there, we apply our Co-Preneur approach: we embed alongside your team like a co-founder would, define the critical journeys, design the knowledge architecture, and implement Gemini across chat, email, and phone workflows. We handle the engineering details and security/compliance aspects while your team stays close to decisions, ensuring the final solution fits your processes and can be owned internally after rollout.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media