The Challenge: Channel-Hopping Customers

When customers don’t get a fast, clear answer in one support channel, they simply try again somewhere else. The same person might email support, start a website chat, and then call your hotline about the very same issue. Each touchpoint often becomes a separate ticket, handled by different agents, in different tools. The result: your team fights the illusion of high volume instead of real complexity.

Traditional approaches – adding more agents, tightening SLAs, or publishing static FAQs – don’t solve this pattern anymore. Customers expect instant, consistent answers wherever they show up, at any time of day. Legacy knowledge bases, unconnected chatbots, and siloed phone IVR scripts all tell slightly different stories. Even when the content is correct, it’s rarely personalized to the customer’s exact context or phrased in a way that prevents them from “just checking” in another channel.

The impact on the business is significant. Channel-hopping inflates ticket volume by 20–40% in many organisations, distorts KPIs, and makes workforce planning harder. Agents waste time deduplicating and reconciling cases instead of solving real problems. Customers receive contradictory or repetitive answers, which erodes trust and increases churn risk. At scale, this leads to higher cost-per-contact, slower resolution times, and a competitive disadvantage compared to companies that deliver a smooth, unified support experience.

The good news: this is a solvable problem. By using Gemini as a unified intelligence layer across your website, app, and phone flows, you can serve the same high-quality answer everywhere and close most simple requests before they reach an agent. At Reruption, we’ve helped organisations build AI-powered assistants, automate repetitive support journeys, and reduce avoidable contacts. In the rest of this page, you’ll find practical guidance on how to apply Gemini to your own customer service setup and finally get channel-hopping under control.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI-powered customer service solutions and intelligent chatbots, we’ve seen that channel-hopping is rarely a staffing issue – it’s an experience and consistency issue. Gemini is particularly well suited as a unified brain behind your self-service, chat, and IVR touchpoints because it can consume the same knowledge base and respond in channel-appropriate ways. Below is how we recommend leaders think about using Gemini to reduce channel-hopping and deflect support volume in a sustainable way.

Think in Journeys, Not Channels

Most organisations still design support around internal structures: a ticketing queue here, a chat widget there, an IVR tree on top. To use Gemini for channel-hopping customers effectively, you need to flip the view and map the full journey of a typical issue: search on the website, attempt in-app help, web chat, then phone. This reveals where customers drop out, repeat themselves, or receive conflicting messages.

Once you understand these journeys, you can position Gemini as the single answering layer that accompanies the customer across touchpoints. Strategically, this means your customer service leadership, product team, and IT agree on a shared outcome (e.g. “first issue resolution within one interaction”) rather than channel-specific KPIs (e.g. “reduce phone AHT”). It also means prioritising the journeys that drive the most duplicate tickets instead of trying to cover every possible question from day one.

Use a Single Source of Truth for All AI Answers

The biggest driver of channel-hopping is inconsistency: the FAQ says one thing, the chatbot another, and the phone agent something else. To break this, treat Gemini as an orchestrator sitting on top of a single, governed knowledge base. This can be a combination of your help centre, policy documents, and product data – but it must be curated, versioned, and owned.

Strategically, assign a cross-functional content owner (often within customer service) who is accountable for answer quality across all channels. Gemini then references exactly this source for email drafts, chat answers, and IVR explanations. This reduces legal and compliance risk and makes updates (e.g. new pricing, policy changes) propagate instantly everywhere, removing a major reason for customers to double-check information through other channels.

Design for Deflection Without Sacrificing Trust

Deflecting support volume is valuable only if it maintains or improves the customer’s trust. Over-aggressive bots that block access to humans will simply drive customers to another channel or churn. When planning Gemini-powered self-service, define clear guardrails: which topics should be fully auto-resolved, which require guided self-service, and which should be quickly escalated to a human.

At a strategic level, set expectations transparently. Let customers know they are talking to an AI assistant, show how to reach a person when necessary, and ensure Gemini summarises the conversation for the agent so the customer never has to repeat themselves. This builds confidence in the AI while still safeguarding your brand experience.

Align Customer Service, IT, and Compliance Early

Introducing Gemini into customer service workflows touches multiple teams: service operations, IT, data security, and often legal. If these stakeholders only meet at go-live, you’ll end up with delays, unclear responsibilities, and half-implemented capabilities. Instead, treat Gemini adoption as a cross-functional initiative with a declared sponsor and clear decision rights.

From the outset, align on data usage (what Gemini can see), logging and monitoring requirements, and escalation rules. This creates the conditions for safe experimentation: your service team can iterate on prompts and workflows; IT can ensure performance and integration stability; compliance can sign off on how customer data is processed. The result is faster learning cycles and less friction when you move from pilot to scale.

Measure Duplicates and Channel-Hopping Explicitly

Many customer service dashboards focus on high-level indicators like total ticket volume or average handle time. To know whether Gemini actually reduces channel-hopping, you need specific metrics: duplicate ticket rate per issue type, number of distinct channels touched per unique customer problem, and time to first effective answer (not just first response).

Strategically, define these metrics before you deploy Gemini so you have a credible baseline. Then instrument your systems to link interactions using identifiers such as customer ID, email, or session tokens. This lets you track how often a query that starts via a Gemini chatbot ends up as a phone call later. By monitoring this over time, you can tune content, prompts, and workflows where deflection is not yet strong enough and demonstrate impact to the wider organisation with evidence rather than anecdotes.

Used thoughtfully, Gemini can become the consistent brain behind all your support channels, eliminating the gaps and contradictions that drive customers to keep hopping between email, chat, and phone. By aligning journeys, knowledge, and metrics, you transform AI from a standalone chatbot into a true volume-deflection engine. Reruption brings the combination of AI engineering depth and hands-on customer service experience to design and implement these Gemini-powered workflows end to end; if you want to test what this looks like in your environment, our AI PoC is a fast, low-risk way to move from concept to a working prototype.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From E-commerce to Retail: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Zalando

E-commerce

In the online fashion retail sector, high return rates—often exceeding 30-40% for apparel—stem primarily from fit and sizing uncertainties, as customers cannot physically try on items before purchase . Zalando, Europe's largest fashion e-tailer serving 27 million active customers across 25 markets, faced substantial challenges with these returns, incurring massive logistics costs, environmental impact, and customer dissatisfaction due to inconsistent sizing across over 6,000 brands and 150,000+ products . Traditional size charts and recommendations proved insufficient, with early surveys showing up to 50% of returns attributed to poor fit perception, hindering conversion rates and repeat purchases in a competitive market . This was compounded by the lack of immersive shopping experiences online, leading to hesitation among tech-savvy millennials and Gen Z shoppers who demanded more personalized, visual tools.

Lösung

Zalando addressed these pain points by deploying a generative computer vision-powered virtual try-on solution, enabling users to upload selfies or use avatars to see realistic garment overlays tailored to their body shape and measurements . Leveraging machine learning models for pose estimation, body segmentation, and AI-generated rendering, the tool predicts optimal sizes and simulates draping effects, integrating with Zalando's ML platform for scalable personalization . The system combines computer vision (e.g., for landmark detection) with generative AI techniques to create hyper-realistic visualizations, drawing from vast datasets of product images, customer data, and 3D scans, ultimately aiming to cut returns while enhancing engagement . Piloted online and expanded to outlets, it forms part of Zalando's broader AI ecosystem including size predictors and style assistants.

Ergebnisse

  • 30,000+ customers used virtual fitting room shortly after launch
  • 5-10% projected reduction in return rates
  • Up to 21% fewer wrong-size returns via related AI size tools
  • Expanded to all physical outlets by 2023 for jeans category
  • Supports 27 million customers across 25 European markets
  • Part of AI strategy boosting personalization for 150,000+ products
Read case study →

Revolut

Fintech

Revolut faced escalating Authorized Push Payment (APP) fraud, where scammers psychologically manipulate customers into authorizing transfers to fraudulent accounts, often under guises like investment opportunities. Traditional rule-based systems struggled against sophisticated social engineering tactics, leading to substantial financial losses despite Revolut's rapid growth to over 35 million customers worldwide. The rise in digital payments amplified vulnerabilities, with fraudsters exploiting real-time transfers that bypassed conventional checks. APP scams evaded detection by mimicking legitimate behaviors, resulting in billions in global losses annually and eroding customer trust in fintech platforms like Revolut. Urgent need for intelligent, adaptive anomaly detection to intervene before funds were pushed.

Lösung

Revolut deployed an AI-powered scam detection feature using machine learning anomaly detection to monitor transactions and user behaviors in real-time. The system analyzes patterns indicative of scams, such as unusual payment prompts tied to investment lures, and intervenes by alerting users or blocking suspicious actions. Leveraging supervised and unsupervised ML algorithms, it detects deviations from normal behavior during high-risk moments, 'breaking the scammer's spell' before authorization. Integrated into the app, it processes vast transaction data for proactive fraud prevention without disrupting legitimate flows.

Ergebnisse

  • 30% reduction in fraud losses from APP-related card scams
  • Targets investment opportunity scams specifically
  • Real-time intervention during testing phase
  • Protects 35 million global customers
  • Deployed since February 2024
Read case study →

Cruise (GM)

Automotive

Developing a self-driving taxi service in dense urban environments posed immense challenges for Cruise. Complex scenarios like unpredictable pedestrians, erratic cyclists, construction zones, and adverse weather demanded near-perfect perception and decision-making in real-time. Safety was paramount, as any failure could result in accidents, regulatory scrutiny, or public backlash. Early testing revealed gaps in handling edge cases, such as emergency vehicles or occluded objects, requiring robust AI to exceed human driver performance. A pivotal safety incident in October 2023 amplified these issues: a Cruise vehicle struck a pedestrian pushed into its path by a hit-and-run driver, then dragged her while fleeing the scene, leading to suspension of operations nationwide. This exposed vulnerabilities in post-collision behavior, sensor fusion under chaos, and regulatory compliance. Scaling to commercial robotaxi fleets while achieving zero at-fault incidents proved elusive amid $10B+ investments from GM.

Lösung

Cruise addressed these with an integrated AI stack leveraging computer vision for perception and reinforcement learning for planning. Lidar, radar, and 30+ cameras fed into CNNs and transformers for object detection, semantic segmentation, and scene prediction, processing 360° views at high fidelity even in low light or rain. Reinforcement learning optimized trajectory planning and behavioral decisions, trained on millions of simulated miles to handle rare events. End-to-end neural networks refined motion forecasting, while simulation frameworks accelerated iteration without real-world risk. Post-incident, Cruise enhanced safety protocols, resuming supervised testing in 2024 with improved disengagement rates. GM's pivot integrated this tech into Super Cruise evolution for personal vehicles.

Ergebnisse

  • 1,000,000+ miles driven fully autonomously by 2023
  • 5 million driverless miles used for AI model training
  • $10B+ cumulative investment by GM in Cruise (2016-2024)
  • 30,000+ miles per intervention in early unsupervised tests
  • Operations suspended Oct 2023; resumed supervised May 2024
  • Zero commercial robotaxi revenue; pivoted Dec 2024
Read case study →

Waymo (Alphabet)

Transportation

Developing fully autonomous ride-hailing demanded overcoming extreme challenges in AI reliability for real-world roads. Waymo needed to master perception—detecting objects in fog, rain, night, or occlusions using sensors alone—while predicting erratic human behaviors like jaywalking or sudden lane changes. Planning complex trajectories in dense, unpredictable urban traffic, and precise control to execute maneuvers without collisions, required near-perfect accuracy, as a single failure could be catastrophic . Scaling from tests to commercial fleets introduced hurdles like handling edge cases (e.g., school buses with stop signs, emergency vehicles), regulatory approvals across cities, and public trust amid scrutiny. Incidents like failing to stop for school buses highlighted software gaps, prompting recalls. Massive data needs for training, compute-intensive models, and geographic adaptation (e.g., right-hand vs. left-hand driving) compounded issues, with competitors struggling on scalability .

Lösung

Waymo's Waymo Driver stack integrates deep learning end-to-end: perception fuses lidar, radar, and cameras via convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformers for 3D object detection, tracking, and semantic mapping with high fidelity. Prediction models forecast multi-agent behaviors using graph neural networks and video transformers trained on billions of simulated and real miles . For planning, Waymo applied scaling laws—larger models with more data/compute yield power-law gains in forecasting accuracy and trajectory quality—shifting from rule-based to ML-driven motion planning for human-like decisions. Control employs reinforcement learning and model-predictive control hybridized with neural policies for smooth, safe execution. Vast datasets from 96M+ autonomous miles, plus simulations, enable continuous improvement; recent AI strategy emphasizes modular, scalable stacks .

Ergebnisse

  • 450,000+ weekly paid robotaxi rides (Dec 2025)
  • 96 million autonomous miles driven (through June 2025)
  • 3.5x better avoiding injury-causing crashes vs. humans
  • 2x better avoiding police-reported crashes vs. humans
  • Over 71M miles with detailed safety crash analysis
  • 250,000 weekly rides (April 2025 baseline, since doubled)
Read case study →

Amazon

Retail

In the vast e-commerce landscape, online shoppers face significant hurdles in product discovery and decision-making. With millions of products available, customers often struggle to find items matching their specific needs, compare options, or get quick answers to nuanced questions about features, compatibility, and usage. Traditional search bars and static listings fall short, leading to shopping cart abandonment rates as high as 70% industry-wide and prolonged decision times that frustrate users. Amazon, serving over 300 million active customers, encountered amplified challenges during peak events like Prime Day, where query volumes spiked dramatically. Shoppers demanded personalized, conversational assistance akin to in-store help, but scaling human support was impossible. Issues included handling complex, multi-turn queries, integrating real-time inventory and pricing data, and ensuring recommendations complied with safety and accuracy standards amid a $500B+ catalog.

Lösung

Amazon developed Rufus, a generative AI-powered conversational shopping assistant embedded in the Amazon Shopping app and desktop. Rufus leverages a custom-built large language model (LLM) fine-tuned on Amazon's product catalog, customer reviews, and web data, enabling natural, multi-turn conversations to answer questions, compare products, and provide tailored recommendations. Powered by Amazon Bedrock for scalability and AWS Trainium/Inferentia chips for efficient inference, Rufus scales to millions of sessions without latency issues. It incorporates agentic capabilities for tasks like cart addition, price tracking, and deal hunting, overcoming prior limitations in personalization by accessing user history and preferences securely. Implementation involved iterative testing, starting with beta in February 2024, expanding to all US users by September, and global rollouts, addressing hallucination risks through grounding techniques and human-in-loop safeguards.

Ergebnisse

  • 60% higher purchase completion rate for Rufus users
  • $10B projected additional sales from Rufus
  • 250M+ customers used Rufus in 2025
  • Monthly active users up 140% YoY
  • Interactions surged 210% YoY
  • Black Friday sales sessions +100% with Rufus
  • 149% jump in Rufus users recently
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Unify Your Knowledge Base Before You Connect Gemini

Before wiring Gemini into every customer touchpoint, consolidate the sources it will use to answer questions. Identify your primary help centre, internal FAQs, policy documents, and product manuals, then rationalise them into a structured, up-to-date support knowledge base. Remove duplicates, mark deprecated content, and add missing coverage for your top 20 contact reasons.

Next, configure Gemini to index or retrieve from this unified source only. If you are using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), define the document collections (e.g. billing, orders, technical setup) and add metadata tags such as language, region, product line, and validity dates. This ensures that whether a customer talks to a web chatbot, in-app assistant, or automated email responder, Gemini always draws from the same canonical truth.

Embed Gemini in Web Chat to Answer and Contain Simple Requests

Web chat is often the first interaction for digital customers – and a common origin point for channel-hopping. Embed a Gemini-powered virtual agent into your chat widget with the goal of solving or meaningfully progressing common questions in the first interaction. Start with your highest-frequency, low-complexity topics: password resets, order tracking, invoice copies, appointment rescheduling, or basic troubleshooting.

Implement guardrails by configuring intent detection and handover triggers (e.g. when the customer explicitly requests a human or uses certain keywords like “complaint” or “cancellation”). When escalation is needed, have Gemini summarise the entire conversation for the agent and pass it through your CRM so the customer doesn’t need to repeat anything – a key step to preventing them from jumping to another channel out of frustration.

Example Gemini system prompt for chat:
You are a customer service assistant for [Company].
- Answer only based on the provided knowledge base snippets.
- If information is missing, ask one clarifying question, then offer to connect to a human agent.
- Always confirm the customer's main goal in your first response.
- If you resolve the issue, clearly state the outcome and recap next steps.
- If escalating, produce a short summary for the agent including:
  - Customer goal
  - Key details (order ID, product, dates)
  - Steps already taken in chat
  - Customer sentiment (positive/neutral/negative)

Use Gemini to Draft Consistent Email Responses From the Same Knowledge

Email queues are where duplicate tickets usually pile up unnoticed. Integrate Gemini with your ticketing system so it can read the inbound email, pull relevant snippets from the same central knowledge base, and draft a reply for the agent to review. This keeps tone, structure, and content consistent with what your chatbot or IVR communicates.

Configure templates for your main contact reasons and let Gemini fill in the details (order numbers, product names, deadlines) based on the ticket metadata. Use a short system prompt to enforce policy alignment and to prevent Gemini from making commitments outside your rules.

Example Gemini system prompt for email drafting:
You write email replies for the customer service team.
- Use the same policies and information as the support chatbot.
- Be concise, clear, and friendly. Avoid jargon.
- Do not invent policies, prices, or deadlines.
- If the request cannot be fully resolved by email, propose the next concrete step.
Input:
- Customer email
- Relevant knowledge base snippets
- Ticket metadata (name, order ID, product)

Augment IVR and Phone Support With Gemini Summaries

Phone remains a critical channel, especially for high-value or urgent issues, but it is also a common last resort when self-service fails. While Gemini cannot answer a phone call directly, you can integrate it into your IVR flows and agent desktop. For example, capture short descriptions from the caller via speech-to-text in IVR, then let Gemini classify intent and suggest knowledge-based answers that the IVR can play back.

For calls that reach agents, use Gemini to generate real-time summaries and recommended responses based on the conversation transcript. This both reduces after-call work and ensures that if the customer follows up later via email or chat, your systems have a consistent, AI-generated summary that other channels can pick up on – dramatically lowering the risk of contradictory answers.

Example Gemini prompt for call summarisation:
You summarise customer service calls.
Produce:
- 2-3 sentence summary of the issue
- Key data points (IDs, dates, products) as a bullet list
- Root cause as one short sentence
- Next steps and owner (customer vs. company)
The summary should be understandable by any support agent who might handle a follow-up in email or chat.

Link Interactions to Prevent Duplicate Tickets

To tackle channel-hopping directly, configure your systems so Gemini can help detect when a new interaction is likely a duplicate of an existing case. Use shared identifiers (email, phone number, customer ID, or authenticated app session) and let Gemini compare the new message with open tickets. If similarity is high, propose linking it to the existing ticket instead of opening a fresh one.

On the customer side, instruct your Gemini chatbot to acknowledge when a case already exists: “I can see we’re already working on your issue about [summary]. Here’s the latest status…” This alone can stop many customers from “just checking” via another route. On the agent side, surface a banner in the ticket interface: “Possible duplicate of Ticket #12345 – same customer, similar description,” with a Gemini-generated rationale.

Establish KPIs and Feedback Loops for Continuous Tuning

Once Gemini is live across channels, treat it as a product, not a one-off deployment. Define KPIs such as deflection rate for top 10 intents, duplicate ticket rate per issue type, average number of channels per resolved issue, and customer satisfaction for AI-handled interactions. Dashboards should make it easy for operations leads to see which journeys are working well and which still trigger channel-hopping.

Implement a lightweight feedback loop: allow agents to flag AI suggestions as helpful or unhelpful, and let customers rate AI chat conversations. Regularly review low-performing intents and update your knowledge base, prompts, or workflows accordingly. Over time, this tuning can realistically deliver 15–30% fewer duplicate tickets, shorter resolution times for simple issues, and a noticeable improvement in perceived responsiveness – without adding headcount.

Expected outcome: By unifying knowledge, embedding Gemini in chat, email, and phone workflows, and actively linking related interactions, organisations typically see a reduction in duplicate tickets and channel-hopping within 4–8 weeks of focused implementation, freeing agents to handle complex cases and improving overall customer satisfaction.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini reduces channel-hopping by ensuring that customers receive the same accurate answer regardless of where they show up. It uses one governed knowledge base to power your chatbot, email drafts, and IVR suggestions, so the information in each channel is aligned.

When a customer recontacts you, Gemini can also recognise the context based on identifiers (email, customer ID, phone number) and summarise previous interactions. That means the chatbot can say “Here’s the latest on your existing case” instead of starting from zero, and agents can continue the story instead of creating a new ticket. This combination of consistent answers and continuity is what discourages customers from trying multiple channels for the same issue.

You don’t need a large data science team, but you do need three capabilities: a customer service owner who knows your main contact reasons, an engineering or IT resource to integrate Gemini with your chat, email, and IVR systems, and someone responsible for maintaining the knowledge base.

Reruption typically works with existing service leaders and a small internal IT team. We handle the AI configuration, prompt design, and integration patterns, while your team provides domain knowledge, policies, and access to systems like your CRM or ticketing platform. Over time, we help your people learn how to adjust prompts and content so they can run and evolve the solution themselves.

For a focused scope (e.g. the top 10–20 reasons customers contact you), you can see measurable impact from Gemini-powered support deflection in 4–8 weeks. The first few weeks are usually spent unifying the knowledge base, connecting Gemini to one or two channels, and tuning prompts for your specific tone and policies.

Once live, you’ll see early indicators in chat containment rates, fewer new tickets for those intents, and fewer customers using multiple channels for the same issue. Full optimisation across email, chat, and phone can take several months, but you don’t need to wait that long to benefit – a well-designed pilot in a single channel already reveals how much duplicate volume you can realistically remove.

The cost of a Gemini-based customer service solution has three components: usage costs for the Gemini model itself, integration and engineering work, and ongoing knowledge/content governance. For most organisations, model usage is relatively small compared to the cost of agent time; the main investment is in getting the workflows and integrations right.

In terms of ROI, companies dealing with significant channel-hopping can often reduce duplicate tickets by 15–30% in the first phase and shorten resolution times for simple issues. That translates directly into fewer contacts per customer problem, lower cost per resolved issue, and more capacity for agents to handle complex or high-value cases. When designed correctly, the payback period is typically measured in months rather than years.

Reruption specialises in building AI solutions for customer service that move beyond slideware into real, shipped products. With our AI PoC offering (9,900€), we can validate within a short timeframe whether Gemini can effectively deflect volume and reduce channel-hopping in your specific environment, using your data and systems.

From there, we apply our Co-Preneur approach: we embed alongside your team like a co-founder would, define the critical journeys, design the knowledge architecture, and implement Gemini across chat, email, and phone workflows. We handle the engineering details and security/compliance aspects while your team stays close to decisions, ensuring the final solution fits your processes and can be owned internally after rollout.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media