The Challenge: Manual Bid and Budget Tuning

Most performance marketing teams still spend hours each week adjusting bids and budgets across campaigns, ad groups, keywords, and audiences. They juggle platform dashboards, spreadsheets, and weekly reports trying to keep spend aligned with targets like ROAS, CPA, or incremental revenue. The result is a reactive routine: fix whatever looks red today and hope it holds until the next check-in.

Traditional approaches — manual rules, static bid schedules, and occasional bulk edits — no longer work in an environment where auctions, competition, and user behaviour shift minute by minute. Humans simply cannot process the volume of signals coming from Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, and other channels in real time. Even with automated bidding features switched on, settings are often based on gut feeling, outdated assumptions, and fragmented data instead of a coherent, testable strategy.

The business impact is significant. Misaligned bids and budgets lead to overspending on low-intent traffic, starving high-performing segments, and missing pockets of profitable demand. Performance fluctuates unpredictably, scaling successful campaigns feels risky, and marketing leaders struggle to forecast or defend their acquisition costs. Over time, this erodes margin, weakens competitive position in auctions, and makes it harder to justify additional marketing investment.

The good news: this challenge is solvable. With the right use of AI — particularly analysis-focused tools like Claude — you can turn messy performance data into clear bidding strategies, governance rules, and simulation scenarios that let automated systems do the heavy lifting. At Reruption, we’ve helped teams move from manual tweaking to AI-first workflows in comparable high-stakes, data-heavy environments. Below, you’ll find practical guidance on how to use Claude to redesign your bid and budget process so it finally scales with your growth ambitions.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s perspective, Claude for bid and budget optimization is not about replacing Google’s or Meta’s native algorithms. It’s about using Claude as a strategic layer on top of your ad platforms: reviewing large, complex performance datasets, identifying where bids and budgets are misaligned with business goals, and helping your team design robust automated bidding and pacing strategies. Drawing on our hands-on experience implementing production-grade AI solutions, we’ve seen that the biggest gains come when marketing teams treat Claude as a decision partner and governance engine, not just another reporting tool.

Shift from Reactive Tweaks to a Governance Mindset

The first strategic move is mental: stop treating bid and budget tuning as a daily firefighting task and start designing a governance system. Claude is exceptionally good at turning historical performance data and business constraints into explicit rules, thresholds, and decision trees. Instead of asking, “What should I change today?”, you use Claude to define how the system should behave under different conditions.

In practice, this means feeding Claude anonymised performance exports and clear objectives (e.g. target ROAS, margin constraints, or customer lifetime value priorities). Ask it to surface patterns where your current bids and budgets contradict those objectives, and to draft policy-like guidelines: what to scale, what to cap, and how quickly. This shifts your team from manual micro-decisions to maintaining and improving a clear, AI-assisted governance framework.

Treat Claude as the Strategy Layer Above Native Smart Bidding

Native smart bidding and budget automation in platforms like Google Ads or Meta are powerful, but they optimize for their own understanding of conversions and value. Claude helps you translate your specific business economics into settings and constraints that these systems can respect. Strategically, this means Claude doesn’t compete with automated bidding — it orchestrates it.

Use Claude to consolidate data across channels, including revenue quality (refunds, margin, LTV indicators) from your CRM or data warehouse. Then have it propose channel-specific strategies: where to use tROAS vs. tCPA, when to set portfolio-level vs. campaign-level targets, and how to distribute budgets between prospecting and remarketing. This ensures that your automated bidding works toward a coherent, cross-channel plan rather than isolated channel metrics.

Prepare Your Team for AI-Assisted Decision-Making

Successful AI-driven marketing operations require more than tools; they require teams that know how to question and operationalise AI recommendations. Claude’s outputs are only as useful as the questions your marketers ask and the way they integrate those answers into workflows. Strategically, you want your team to move from “button clickers” to “policy designers.”

Invest in upskilling around prompt design, understanding model limitations, and interpreting structured recommendations. Define who owns the “source of truth” for business targets and constraints, and how often assumptions are reviewed. With this readiness in place, Claude’s analyses of bid strategies and budget allocations become strong input into your operating rhythm—not one-off experiments that fade after a quarter.

Use Simulation and Scenario Planning Before Scaling

One of Claude’s biggest strategic advantages is its ability to build and explain simulation scenarios from historical data and forecast assumptions. Before you dramatically increase budgets or loosen ROAS targets, you can use Claude to model what happens to spend, CPA, and volume under different conditions. This lowers the perceived risk of scaling and makes decisions easier to defend to finance and leadership.

Feed Claude aggregates like spend, impressions, CPC, conversion rate, and revenue by campaign or audience segment. Ask it to simulate the effects of incremental budget changes, target adjustments, or channel shifts, and to highlight where you’re likely to hit diminishing returns. This scenario planning mindset turns scaling from a leap of faith into a structured, AI-supported decision.

Design Risk Controls and Guardrails Upfront

When you lean into automated bidding and pacing, you must also design safety nets. Strategically, this means using Claude to help define guardrails: maximum daily loss limits, minimum profitability thresholds, and clear rules for pausing or throttling campaigns when anomalies appear. Without this, even the best automation can overshoot your risk appetite.

Use Claude to review historical “bad days” or underperforming periods and identify early-warning signals—spikes in CPC, drops in conversion rate, changes in audience mix. Then have it translate these into human-readable policies your team and tools can enforce. This ensures that your shift from manual to AI-driven bid and budget management actually reduces risk instead of just hiding it inside algorithms.

Used correctly, Claude becomes the analytical brain behind your bid and budget strategy: it surfaces misallocations, encodes your business logic into actionable guidelines, and de-risks the move toward automated bidding and pacing. At Reruption, we specialise in turning this kind of AI capability into real, embedded workflows inside marketing teams, not just slideware. If you’re ready to move beyond manual tuning but want a clear, governed path to get there, we can help you design, prototype, and roll out a Claude-powered approach that fits your goals and constraints.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Transportation to Fintech: Learn how companies successfully use Claude.

Waymo (Alphabet)

Transportation

Developing fully autonomous ride-hailing demanded overcoming extreme challenges in AI reliability for real-world roads. Waymo needed to master perception—detecting objects in fog, rain, night, or occlusions using sensors alone—while predicting erratic human behaviors like jaywalking or sudden lane changes. Planning complex trajectories in dense, unpredictable urban traffic, and precise control to execute maneuvers without collisions, required near-perfect accuracy, as a single failure could be catastrophic . Scaling from tests to commercial fleets introduced hurdles like handling edge cases (e.g., school buses with stop signs, emergency vehicles), regulatory approvals across cities, and public trust amid scrutiny. Incidents like failing to stop for school buses highlighted software gaps, prompting recalls. Massive data needs for training, compute-intensive models, and geographic adaptation (e.g., right-hand vs. left-hand driving) compounded issues, with competitors struggling on scalability .

Lösung

Waymo's Waymo Driver stack integrates deep learning end-to-end: perception fuses lidar, radar, and cameras via convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformers for 3D object detection, tracking, and semantic mapping with high fidelity. Prediction models forecast multi-agent behaviors using graph neural networks and video transformers trained on billions of simulated and real miles . For planning, Waymo applied scaling laws—larger models with more data/compute yield power-law gains in forecasting accuracy and trajectory quality—shifting from rule-based to ML-driven motion planning for human-like decisions. Control employs reinforcement learning and model-predictive control hybridized with neural policies for smooth, safe execution. Vast datasets from 96M+ autonomous miles, plus simulations, enable continuous improvement; recent AI strategy emphasizes modular, scalable stacks .

Ergebnisse

  • 450,000+ weekly paid robotaxi rides (Dec 2025)
  • 96 million autonomous miles driven (through June 2025)
  • 3.5x better avoiding injury-causing crashes vs. humans
  • 2x better avoiding police-reported crashes vs. humans
  • Over 71M miles with detailed safety crash analysis
  • 250,000 weekly rides (April 2025 baseline, since doubled)
Read case study →

Cleveland Clinic

Healthcare

At Cleveland Clinic, one of the largest academic medical centers, physicians grappled with a heavy documentation burden, spending up to 2 hours per day on electronic health record (EHR) notes, which detracted from patient care time. This issue was compounded by the challenge of timely sepsis identification, a condition responsible for nearly 350,000 U.S. deaths annually, where subtle early symptoms often evade traditional monitoring, leading to delayed antibiotics and 20-30% mortality rates in severe cases. Sepsis detection relied on manual vital sign checks and clinician judgment, frequently missing signals 6-12 hours before onset. Integrating unstructured data like clinical notes was manual and inconsistent, exacerbating risks in high-volume ICUs.

Lösung

Cleveland Clinic piloted Bayesian Health’s AI platform, a predictive analytics tool that processes structured and unstructured data (vitals, labs, notes) via machine learning to forecast sepsis risk up to 12 hours early, generating real-time EHR alerts for clinicians. The system uses advanced NLP to mine clinical documentation for subtle indicators. Complementing this, the Clinic explored ambient AI solutions like speech-to-text systems (e.g., similar to Nuance DAX or Abridge), which passively listen to doctor-patient conversations, apply NLP for transcription and summarization, auto-populating EHR notes to cut documentation time by 50% or more. These were integrated into workflows to address both prediction and admin burdens.

Ergebnisse

  • 12 hours earlier sepsis prediction
  • 32% increase in early detection rate
  • 87% sensitivity and specificity in AI models
  • 50% reduction in physician documentation time
  • 17% fewer false positives vs. physician alone
  • Expanded to full rollout post-pilot (Sep 2025)
Read case study →

Wells Fargo

Banking

Wells Fargo, serving 70 million customers across 35 countries, faced intense demand for 24/7 customer service in its mobile banking app, where users needed instant support for transactions like transfers and bill payments. Traditional systems struggled with high interaction volumes, long wait times, and the need for rapid responses via voice and text, especially as customer expectations shifted toward seamless digital experiences. Regulatory pressures in banking amplified challenges, requiring strict data privacy to prevent PII exposure while scaling AI without human intervention. Additionally, most large banks were stuck in proof-of-concept stages for generative AI, lacking production-ready solutions that balanced innovation with compliance. Wells Fargo needed a virtual assistant capable of handling complex queries autonomously, providing spending insights, and continuously improving without compromising security or efficiency.

Lösung

Wells Fargo developed Fargo, a generative AI virtual assistant integrated into its banking app, leveraging Google Cloud AI including Dialogflow for conversational flow and PaLM 2/Flash 2.0 LLMs for natural language understanding. This model-agnostic architecture enabled privacy-forward orchestration, routing queries without sending PII to external models. Launched in March 2023 after a 2022 announcement, Fargo supports voice/text interactions for tasks like transfers, bill pay, and spending analysis. Continuous updates added AI-driven insights, agentic capabilities via Google Agentspace, ensuring zero human handoffs and scalability for regulated industries. The approach overcame challenges by focusing on secure, efficient AI deployment.

Ergebnisse

  • 245 million interactions in 2024
  • 20 million interactions by Jan 2024 since March 2023 launch
  • Projected 100 million interactions annually (2024 forecast)
  • Zero human handoffs across all interactions
  • Zero PII exposed to LLMs
  • Average 2.7 interactions per user session
Read case study →

Unilever

Human Resources

Unilever, a consumer goods giant handling 1.8 million job applications annually, struggled with a manual recruitment process that was extremely time-consuming and inefficient . Traditional methods took up to four months to fill positions, overburdening recruiters and delaying talent acquisition across its global operations . The process also risked unconscious biases in CV screening and interviews, limiting workforce diversity and potentially overlooking qualified candidates from underrepresented groups . High volumes made it impossible to assess every applicant thoroughly, leading to high costs estimated at millions annually and inconsistent hiring quality . Unilever needed a scalable, fair system to streamline early-stage screening while maintaining psychometric rigor.

Lösung

Unilever adopted an AI-powered recruitment funnel partnering with Pymetrics for neuroscience-based gamified assessments that measure cognitive, emotional, and behavioral traits via ML algorithms trained on diverse global data . This was followed by AI-analyzed video interviews using computer vision and NLP to evaluate body language, facial expressions, tone of voice, and word choice objectively . Applications were anonymized to minimize bias, with AI shortlisting top 10-20% of candidates for human review, integrating psychometric ML models for personality profiling . The system was piloted in high-volume entry-level roles before global rollout .

Ergebnisse

  • Time-to-hire: 90% reduction (4 months to 4 weeks)
  • Recruiter time saved: 50,000 hours
  • Annual cost savings: £1 million
  • Diversity hires increase: 16% (incl. neuro-atypical candidates)
  • Candidates shortlisted for humans: 90% reduction
  • Applications processed: 1.8 million/year
Read case study →

AT&T

Telecommunications

As a leading telecom operator, AT&T manages one of the world's largest and most complex networks, spanning millions of cell sites, fiber optics, and 5G infrastructure. The primary challenges included inefficient network planning and optimization, such as determining optimal cell site placement and spectrum acquisition amid exploding data demands from 5G rollout and IoT growth. Traditional methods relied on manual analysis, leading to suboptimal resource allocation and higher capital expenditures. Additionally, reactive network maintenance caused frequent outages, with anomaly detection lagging behind real-time needs. Detecting and fixing issues proactively was critical to minimize downtime, but vast data volumes from network sensors overwhelmed legacy systems. This resulted in increased operational costs, customer dissatisfaction, and delayed 5G deployment. AT&T needed scalable AI to predict failures, automate healing, and forecast demand accurately.

Lösung

AT&T integrated machine learning and predictive analytics through its AT&T Labs, developing models for network design including spectrum refarming and cell site optimization. AI algorithms analyze geospatial data, traffic patterns, and historical performance to recommend ideal tower locations, reducing build costs. For operations, anomaly detection and self-healing systems use predictive models on NFV (Network Function Virtualization) to forecast failures and automate fixes, like rerouting traffic. Causal AI extends beyond correlations for root-cause analysis in churn and network issues. Implementation involved edge-to-edge intelligence, deploying AI across 100,000+ engineers' workflows.

Ergebnisse

  • Billions of dollars saved in network optimization costs
  • 20-30% improvement in network utilization and efficiency
  • Significant reduction in truck rolls and manual interventions
  • Proactive detection of anomalies preventing major outages
  • Optimized cell site placement reducing CapEx by millions
  • Enhanced 5G forecasting accuracy by up to 40%
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Audit Your Current Ad Accounts with Claude

Start by using Claude as a performance analyst for your existing campaigns. Export key metrics (spend, clicks, CPC, conversions, revenue, ROAS, CPA) by campaign, ad group, keyword, and audience for a recent period. Clean any sensitive identifiers and share the data with Claude in CSV or table form.

Prompt Claude to identify where bids and budgets are misaligned with your goals. Ask it to find campaigns with strong ROAS but limited budgets, segments with high spend but weak performance, and areas where you’re paying too much for low-intent clicks. This gives you a concrete baseline of “quick-win” reallocations before you even touch automation settings.

Example prompt for a Claude account audit:
You are a senior performance marketing analyst.

Goal:
- Improve overall ROAS while keeping total spend stable.
- Identify where bids and budgets are misaligned with performance.

Inputs:
- Here is a CSV extract with campaign, ad_group, audience, spend, clicks,
  cpc, conversions, revenue, roas, cpa for the last 30 days.

Tasks:
1) Summarise the top 10 biggest budget misallocations.
2) Flag campaigns/ad groups that deserve more budget based on ROAS and volume.
3) Flag areas where we should reduce bids or budgets.
4) Propose 3–5 concrete reallocation actions with estimated impact.

Expected outcome: a prioritised list of reallocation opportunities, usually revealing 5–15% of spend that can be quickly redirected without increasing risk.

Use Claude to Design Clear Bid Strategies Per Channel

Next, move from observations to codified bid strategies. For each major channel (e.g. Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn), feed Claude your KPIs, business constraints, and historical patterns. Ask it to recommend which bidding strategies (tROAS, tCPA, Maximise Conversions, etc.) and target levels best fit each campaign type (brand, generic, competitor, remarketing).

Include examples of past changes you’ve made and their impact so Claude can learn from your context. Have it return a structured playbook describing when to switch strategies, how to set initial targets, and how to adjust them over time. This document becomes the backbone of your paid media governance.

Example prompt for bid strategy design:
You are helping us redesign our bidding strategy.

Context:
- Business goal: maximise profitable revenue at a blended ROAS of 4.0.
- Constraints: do not exceed a blended CPA of 60 EUR.
- Here is a summary of performance by campaign type and channel.

Tasks:
1) Propose recommended bidding strategies for each campaign type.
2) Suggest initial target ROAS/CPA ranges.
3) Describe when we should switch a campaign to a different strategy.
4) Provide a short, easy-to-follow playbook structure our team can adopt.

Expected outcome: a channel- and campaign-specific bidding playbook that your marketers can reference when configuring or scaling campaigns.

Generate Budget Reallocation Scenarios with Claude

Once you have a baseline and bid strategy, use Claude to build budget reallocation scenarios. Provide aggregated data by campaign or audience and specify the total budget you can move. Ask Claude to simulate different distributions, such as concentrating spend on top performers vs. spreading it more evenly, and to estimate the impact on volume and efficiency.

Make Claude explain its assumptions explicitly (e.g. linear vs. non-linear returns, expected saturation) and suggest KPIs to monitor during live tests. You can then implement one of the proposed scenarios in your ad platforms as a controlled experiment.

Example prompt for budget scenarios:
You are a marketing finance copilot.

Goal:
- Reallocate 20% of our current paid search budget without increasing risk.

Inputs:
- Table with campaign, current_budget, conversions, revenue, roas, cpa.

Tasks:
1) Create three budget reallocation scenarios:
   a) Aggressive growth
   b) Balanced
   c) Risk-averse
2) For each scenario, show new budgets by campaign and expected impact
   on total conversions, revenue, ROAS, and CPA.
3) Recommend which scenario we should test first and why.

Expected outcome: 2–3 realistic alternative budget plans with clear trade-offs that can be A/B tested or sequentially trialed in your ad accounts.

Codify Guardrails and Alert Rules with Claude

Use Claude to convert fuzzy risk concerns into explicit guardrails and alert rules. Share examples of days or weeks where performance deteriorated and ask Claude to identify early signals that could have triggered intervention: sudden CPC jumps, conversion rate drops, changes in device mix, or anomalies in specific audiences.

Then have Claude draft monitoring rules you can implement using platform scripts, BI dashboards, or simple spreadsheet checks. It should specify exact thresholds, lookback windows, and recommended actions (pause, cap budget, or tighten targets).

Example prompt for guardrail design:
You are helping us design risk controls for our ad accounts.

Inputs:
- Examples of dates and campaigns with very poor performance.
- Our current risk appetite: we accept up to 10% daily variance in ROAS.

Tasks:
1) Identify early warning signals that typically precede bad days.
2) Propose concrete monitoring rules with numeric thresholds.
3) For each rule, specify the automatic or manual action to take.
4) Output the rules in a table we can easily hand over to our ops team.

Expected outcome: a practical set of risk controls that can be implemented as scripts or checks, reducing the downside risk of increased automation.

Turn Claude’s Insights into Repeatable Weekly Workflows

To move beyond one-off audits, embed Claude into your weekly optimization rituals. Standardise prompts and inputs so every week your team runs the same analyses: top budget misallocations, campaigns eligible for more investment, underperformers to fix or pause, and potential test ideas.

Store your best prompts in a shared library and refine them based on experience. Integrate Claude outputs directly into your existing planning formats (e.g. weekly performance docs, sprint boards), so the AI’s recommendations translate into concrete tasks with owners and deadlines.

Example weekly workflow prompt:
You are our weekly paid media optimization assistant.

Goal this week:
- Maintain ROAS >= 3.8 while testing growth opportunities.

Inputs:
- Updated performance extract (last 7 and last 30 days).
- Last week's action log (changes we made).

Tasks:
1) Summarise key trends and anomalies.
2) List the top 10 actions we should take this week, labelled as
   "Scale", "Fix", or "Test".
3) For each action, estimate potential impact and urgency.
4) Flag any risks or data quality issues you see.

Expected outcome: a consistent, AI-supported optimisation routine that can reduce manual analysis time by 30–50% while making budget and bid decisions more data-driven and less ad hoc.

Use a PoC to Validate the Approach Before Full Rollout

Before rebuilding your entire marketing operating model, run a contained AI proof of concept. Select one or two key channels and a limited number of campaigns. With Reruption’s 9.900€ AI PoC approach, you can define a narrow scope (e.g. “use Claude to optimise budget allocation and bid strategy for our core search and remarketing campaigns”), prototype the workflows above, and measure impact on ROAS and team effort.

Within a few weeks, you’ll know if the Claude-based governance and decision-support layer works in your environment, what integration steps are needed, and how to scale it responsibly. Many organisations see 5–15% efficiency improvements and a noticeable reduction in “spreadsheet time” even at this early stage.

Expected outcomes: clearer bid and budget strategies, 5–15% better efficiency on targeted campaigns, and 30–50% less manual analysis time for the scoped area, with a concrete roadmap for scaling the approach across channels.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude does not push buttons in Google Ads or Meta directly. Instead, it acts as a powerful analysis and decision-support layer. You feed it performance data (spend, ROAS, CPA, conversions, etc.), business goals, and constraints. Claude then identifies misallocations, proposes bid strategy adjustments, and suggests specific budget reallocation actions with reasoning. Your team uses these outputs to update platform settings or to refine automated bidding and pacing rules, replacing manual gut-feel tweaks with structured, AI-backed decisions.

You don’t need a full data science team to benefit from Claude, but you do need three things: someone who can export and prepare performance data from your ad platforms, a marketer who understands your business KPIs and can explain them clearly, and a point person willing to experiment with and refine prompts. Basic familiarity with spreadsheets and ad platform metrics is enough to start.

Reruption typically supports clients by setting up the initial data flows, designing a prompt library tailored to their accounts, and training the marketing team on how to interpret and operationalise Claude’s recommendations. Over time, ownership shifts fully to your in-house team.

On a practical level, you can see value from Claude within days: a first account audit often reveals quick-win budget reallocations that improve ROAS or CPA almost immediately. More structural benefits — like a coherent bidding playbook, risk guardrails, and embedded weekly workflows — typically emerge over 4–8 weeks.

If you run a focused proof of concept on a subset of campaigns, you should be able to measure clear impact on efficiency and team workload within one or two optimisation cycles, assuming normal learning periods for automated bidding systems.

Claude itself is relatively inexpensive compared to ad spend and headcount costs. The main investment is in setting up the workflows and training your team. In return, organisations usually unlock 5–15% better efficiency on the campaigns where Claude-guided optimisation is applied, simply by reallocating budgets and adjusting bids more intelligently.

On top of performance gains, marketing teams often reclaim a significant amount of time previously spent on manual analysis and reactive changes. That time can be redirected to strategy, creative testing, and cross-channel planning, which further improves the overall ROI of your marketing budget.

Reruption supports you across the full journey from idea to working solution. With our 9.900€ AI PoC, we first validate that using Claude for your specific ad accounts and data setup is technically and commercially feasible. We define the use case, prototype the key workflows (audits, bid strategy design, budget reallocation scenarios, guardrails), and measure performance and effort impact.

Beyond the PoC, our Co-Preneur approach means we don’t just advise; we embed alongside your team to ship real automations, prompt libraries, and governance processes. We operate inside your P&L and workflows, helping you move from manual bid and budget tuning to a scalable, AI-first operating model for your marketing spend.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media