The Challenge: Manual Bid and Budget Tuning

Most performance marketing teams still spend hours each week adjusting bids and budgets across campaigns, ad groups, keywords, and audiences. They juggle platform dashboards, spreadsheets, and weekly reports trying to keep spend aligned with targets like ROAS, CPA, or incremental revenue. The result is a reactive routine: fix whatever looks red today and hope it holds until the next check-in.

Traditional approaches — manual rules, static bid schedules, and occasional bulk edits — no longer work in an environment where auctions, competition, and user behaviour shift minute by minute. Humans simply cannot process the volume of signals coming from Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, and other channels in real time. Even with automated bidding features switched on, settings are often based on gut feeling, outdated assumptions, and fragmented data instead of a coherent, testable strategy.

The business impact is significant. Misaligned bids and budgets lead to overspending on low-intent traffic, starving high-performing segments, and missing pockets of profitable demand. Performance fluctuates unpredictably, scaling successful campaigns feels risky, and marketing leaders struggle to forecast or defend their acquisition costs. Over time, this erodes margin, weakens competitive position in auctions, and makes it harder to justify additional marketing investment.

The good news: this challenge is solvable. With the right use of AI — particularly analysis-focused tools like Claude — you can turn messy performance data into clear bidding strategies, governance rules, and simulation scenarios that let automated systems do the heavy lifting. At Reruption, we’ve helped teams move from manual tweaking to AI-first workflows in comparable high-stakes, data-heavy environments. Below, you’ll find practical guidance on how to use Claude to redesign your bid and budget process so it finally scales with your growth ambitions.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s perspective, Claude for bid and budget optimization is not about replacing Google’s or Meta’s native algorithms. It’s about using Claude as a strategic layer on top of your ad platforms: reviewing large, complex performance datasets, identifying where bids and budgets are misaligned with business goals, and helping your team design robust automated bidding and pacing strategies. Drawing on our hands-on experience implementing production-grade AI solutions, we’ve seen that the biggest gains come when marketing teams treat Claude as a decision partner and governance engine, not just another reporting tool.

Shift from Reactive Tweaks to a Governance Mindset

The first strategic move is mental: stop treating bid and budget tuning as a daily firefighting task and start designing a governance system. Claude is exceptionally good at turning historical performance data and business constraints into explicit rules, thresholds, and decision trees. Instead of asking, “What should I change today?”, you use Claude to define how the system should behave under different conditions.

In practice, this means feeding Claude anonymised performance exports and clear objectives (e.g. target ROAS, margin constraints, or customer lifetime value priorities). Ask it to surface patterns where your current bids and budgets contradict those objectives, and to draft policy-like guidelines: what to scale, what to cap, and how quickly. This shifts your team from manual micro-decisions to maintaining and improving a clear, AI-assisted governance framework.

Treat Claude as the Strategy Layer Above Native Smart Bidding

Native smart bidding and budget automation in platforms like Google Ads or Meta are powerful, but they optimize for their own understanding of conversions and value. Claude helps you translate your specific business economics into settings and constraints that these systems can respect. Strategically, this means Claude doesn’t compete with automated bidding — it orchestrates it.

Use Claude to consolidate data across channels, including revenue quality (refunds, margin, LTV indicators) from your CRM or data warehouse. Then have it propose channel-specific strategies: where to use tROAS vs. tCPA, when to set portfolio-level vs. campaign-level targets, and how to distribute budgets between prospecting and remarketing. This ensures that your automated bidding works toward a coherent, cross-channel plan rather than isolated channel metrics.

Prepare Your Team for AI-Assisted Decision-Making

Successful AI-driven marketing operations require more than tools; they require teams that know how to question and operationalise AI recommendations. Claude’s outputs are only as useful as the questions your marketers ask and the way they integrate those answers into workflows. Strategically, you want your team to move from “button clickers” to “policy designers.”

Invest in upskilling around prompt design, understanding model limitations, and interpreting structured recommendations. Define who owns the “source of truth” for business targets and constraints, and how often assumptions are reviewed. With this readiness in place, Claude’s analyses of bid strategies and budget allocations become strong input into your operating rhythm—not one-off experiments that fade after a quarter.

Use Simulation and Scenario Planning Before Scaling

One of Claude’s biggest strategic advantages is its ability to build and explain simulation scenarios from historical data and forecast assumptions. Before you dramatically increase budgets or loosen ROAS targets, you can use Claude to model what happens to spend, CPA, and volume under different conditions. This lowers the perceived risk of scaling and makes decisions easier to defend to finance and leadership.

Feed Claude aggregates like spend, impressions, CPC, conversion rate, and revenue by campaign or audience segment. Ask it to simulate the effects of incremental budget changes, target adjustments, or channel shifts, and to highlight where you’re likely to hit diminishing returns. This scenario planning mindset turns scaling from a leap of faith into a structured, AI-supported decision.

Design Risk Controls and Guardrails Upfront

When you lean into automated bidding and pacing, you must also design safety nets. Strategically, this means using Claude to help define guardrails: maximum daily loss limits, minimum profitability thresholds, and clear rules for pausing or throttling campaigns when anomalies appear. Without this, even the best automation can overshoot your risk appetite.

Use Claude to review historical “bad days” or underperforming periods and identify early-warning signals—spikes in CPC, drops in conversion rate, changes in audience mix. Then have it translate these into human-readable policies your team and tools can enforce. This ensures that your shift from manual to AI-driven bid and budget management actually reduces risk instead of just hiding it inside algorithms.

Used correctly, Claude becomes the analytical brain behind your bid and budget strategy: it surfaces misallocations, encodes your business logic into actionable guidelines, and de-risks the move toward automated bidding and pacing. At Reruption, we specialise in turning this kind of AI capability into real, embedded workflows inside marketing teams, not just slideware. If you’re ready to move beyond manual tuning but want a clear, governed path to get there, we can help you design, prototype, and roll out a Claude-powered approach that fits your goals and constraints.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Aerospace to EdTech: Learn how companies successfully use Claude.

Airbus

Aerospace

In aircraft design, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are essential for predicting airflow around wings, fuselages, and novel configurations critical to fuel efficiency and emissions reduction. However, traditional high-fidelity RANS solvers require hours to days per run on supercomputers, limiting engineers to just a few dozen iterations per design cycle and stifling innovation for next-gen hydrogen-powered aircraft like ZEROe. This computational bottleneck was particularly acute amid Airbus' push for decarbonized aviation by 2035, where complex geometries demand exhaustive exploration to optimize lift-drag ratios while minimizing weight. Collaborations with DLR and ONERA highlighted the need for faster tools, as manual tuning couldn't scale to test thousands of variants needed for laminar flow or blended-wing-body concepts.

Lösung

Machine learning surrogate models, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), were trained on vast CFD datasets to emulate full simulations in milliseconds. Airbus integrated these into a generative design pipeline, where AI predicts pressure fields, velocities, and forces, enforcing Navier-Stokes physics via hybrid loss functions for accuracy. Development involved curating millions of simulation snapshots from legacy runs, GPU-accelerated training, and iterative fine-tuning with experimental wind-tunnel data. This enabled rapid iteration: AI screens designs, high-fidelity CFD verifies top candidates, slashing overall compute by orders of magnitude while maintaining <5% error on key metrics.

Ergebnisse

  • Simulation time: 1 hour → 30 ms (120,000x speedup)
  • Design iterations: +10,000 per cycle in same timeframe
  • Prediction accuracy: 95%+ for lift/drag coefficients
  • 50% reduction in design phase timeline
  • 30-40% fewer high-fidelity CFD runs required
  • Fuel burn optimization: up to 5% improvement in predictions
Read case study →

BMW (Spartanburg Plant)

Automotive Manufacturing

The BMW Spartanburg Plant, the company's largest globally producing X-series SUVs, faced intense pressure to optimize assembly processes amid rising demand for SUVs and supply chain disruptions. Traditional manufacturing relied heavily on human workers for repetitive tasks like part transport and insertion, leading to worker fatigue, error rates up to 5-10% in precision tasks, and inefficient resource allocation. With over 11,500 employees handling high-volume production, scheduling shifts and matching workers to tasks manually caused delays and cycle time variability of 15-20%, hindering output scalability. Compounding issues included adapting to Industry 4.0 standards, where rigid robotic arms struggled with flexible tasks in dynamic environments. Labor shortages post-pandemic exacerbated this, with turnover rates climbing, and the need to redeploy skilled workers to value-added roles while minimizing downtime. Machine vision limitations in older systems failed to detect subtle defects, resulting in quality escapes and rework costs estimated at millions annually.

Lösung

BMW partnered with Figure AI to deploy Figure 02 humanoid robots integrated with machine vision for real-time object detection and ML scheduling algorithms for dynamic task allocation. These robots use advanced AI to perceive environments via cameras and sensors, enabling autonomous navigation and manipulation in human-robot collaborative settings. ML models predict production bottlenecks, optimize robot-worker scheduling, and self-monitor performance, reducing human oversight. Implementation involved pilot testing in 2024, where robots handled repetitive tasks like part picking and insertion, coordinated via a central AI orchestration platform. This allowed seamless integration into existing lines, with digital twins simulating scenarios for safe rollout. Challenges like initial collision risks were overcome through reinforcement learning fine-tuning, achieving human-like dexterity.

Ergebnisse

  • 400% increase in robot speed post-trials
  • 7x higher task success rate
  • Reduced cycle times by 20-30%
  • Redeployed 10-15% of workers to skilled tasks
  • $1M+ annual cost savings from efficiency gains
  • Error rates dropped below 1%
Read case study →

NYU Langone Health

Healthcare

NYU Langone Health, a leading academic medical center, faced significant hurdles in leveraging the vast amounts of unstructured clinical notes generated daily across its network. Traditional clinical predictive models relied heavily on structured data like lab results and vitals, but these required complex ETL processes that were time-consuming and limited in scope. Unstructured notes, rich with nuanced physician insights, were underutilized due to challenges in natural language processing, hindering accurate predictions of critical outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and operational events like insurance denials. Clinicians needed real-time, scalable tools to identify at-risk patients early, but existing models struggled with the volume and variability of EHR data—over 4 million notes spanning a decade. This gap led to reactive care, increased costs, and suboptimal patient outcomes, prompting the need for an innovative approach to transform raw text into actionable foresight.

Lösung

To address these challenges, NYU Langone's Division of Applied AI Technologies at the Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science developed NYUTron, a proprietary large language model (LLM) specifically trained on internal clinical notes. Unlike off-the-shelf models, NYUTron was fine-tuned on unstructured EHR text from millions of encounters, enabling it to serve as an all-purpose prediction engine for diverse tasks. The solution involved pre-training a 13-billion-parameter LLM on over 10 years of de-identified notes (approximately 4.8 million inpatient notes), followed by task-specific fine-tuning. This allowed seamless integration into clinical workflows, automating risk flagging directly from physician documentation without manual data structuring. Collaborative efforts, including AI 'Prompt-a-Thons,' accelerated adoption by engaging clinicians in model refinement.

Ergebnisse

  • AUROC: 0.961 for 48-hour mortality prediction (vs. 0.938 benchmark)
  • 92% accuracy in identifying high-risk patients from notes
  • LOS prediction AUROC: 0.891 (5.6% improvement over prior models)
  • Readmission prediction: AUROC 0.812, outperforming clinicians in some tasks
  • Operational predictions (e.g., insurance denial): AUROC up to 0.85
  • 24 clinical tasks with superior performance across mortality, LOS, and comorbidities
Read case study →

Royal Bank of Canada (RBC)

Financial Services

In the competitive retail banking sector, RBC customers faced significant hurdles in managing personal finances. Many struggled to identify excess cash for savings or investments, adhere to budgets, and anticipate cash flow fluctuations. Traditional banking apps offered limited visibility into spending patterns, leading to suboptimal financial decisions and low engagement with digital tools. This lack of personalization resulted in customers feeling overwhelmed, with surveys indicating low confidence in saving and budgeting habits. RBC recognized that generic advice failed to address individual needs, exacerbating issues like overspending and missed savings opportunities. As digital banking adoption grew, the bank needed an innovative solution to transform raw transaction data into actionable, personalized insights to drive customer loyalty and retention.

Lösung

RBC introduced NOMI, an AI-driven digital assistant integrated into its mobile app, powered by machine learning algorithms from Personetics' Engage platform. NOMI analyzes transaction histories, spending categories, and account balances in real-time to generate personalized recommendations, such as automatic transfers to savings accounts, dynamic budgeting adjustments, and predictive cash flow forecasts. The solution employs predictive analytics to detect surplus funds and suggest investments, while proactive alerts remind users of upcoming bills or spending trends. This seamless integration fosters a conversational banking experience, enhancing user trust and engagement without requiring manual input.

Ergebnisse

  • Doubled mobile app engagement rates
  • Increased savings transfers by over 30%
  • Boosted daily active users by 50%
  • Improved customer satisfaction scores by 25%
  • $700M+ projected enterprise value from AI by 2027
  • Higher budgeting adherence leading to 20% better financial habits
Read case study →

John Deere

Agriculture

In conventional agriculture, farmers rely on blanket spraying of herbicides across entire fields, leading to significant waste. This approach applies chemicals indiscriminately to crops and weeds alike, resulting in high costs for inputs—herbicides can account for 10-20% of variable farming expenses—and environmental harm through soil contamination, water runoff, and accelerated weed resistance . Globally, weeds cause up to 34% yield losses, but overuse of herbicides exacerbates resistance in over 500 species, threatening food security . For row crops like cotton, corn, and soybeans, distinguishing weeds from crops is particularly challenging due to visual similarities, varying field conditions (light, dust, speed), and the need for real-time decisions at 15 mph spraying speeds. Labor shortages and rising chemical prices in 2025 further pressured farmers, with U.S. herbicide costs exceeding $6B annually . Traditional methods failed to balance efficacy, cost, and sustainability.

Lösung

See & Spray revolutionizes weed control by integrating high-resolution cameras, AI-powered computer vision, and precision nozzles on sprayers. The system captures images every few inches, uses object detection models to identify weeds (over 77 species) versus crops in milliseconds, and activates sprays only on targets—reducing blanket application . John Deere acquired Blue River Technology in 2017 to accelerate development, training models on millions of annotated images for robust performance across conditions. Available in Premium (high-density) and Select (affordable retrofit) versions, it integrates with existing John Deere equipment via edge computing for real-time inference without cloud dependency . This robotic precision minimizes drift and overlap, aligning with sustainability goals.

Ergebnisse

  • 5 million acres treated in 2025
  • 31 million gallons of herbicide mix saved
  • Nearly 50% reduction in non-residual herbicide use
  • 77+ weed species detected accurately
  • Up to 90% less chemical in clean crop areas
  • ROI within 1-2 seasons for adopters
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Audit Your Current Ad Accounts with Claude

Start by using Claude as a performance analyst for your existing campaigns. Export key metrics (spend, clicks, CPC, conversions, revenue, ROAS, CPA) by campaign, ad group, keyword, and audience for a recent period. Clean any sensitive identifiers and share the data with Claude in CSV or table form.

Prompt Claude to identify where bids and budgets are misaligned with your goals. Ask it to find campaigns with strong ROAS but limited budgets, segments with high spend but weak performance, and areas where you’re paying too much for low-intent clicks. This gives you a concrete baseline of “quick-win” reallocations before you even touch automation settings.

Example prompt for a Claude account audit:
You are a senior performance marketing analyst.

Goal:
- Improve overall ROAS while keeping total spend stable.
- Identify where bids and budgets are misaligned with performance.

Inputs:
- Here is a CSV extract with campaign, ad_group, audience, spend, clicks,
  cpc, conversions, revenue, roas, cpa for the last 30 days.

Tasks:
1) Summarise the top 10 biggest budget misallocations.
2) Flag campaigns/ad groups that deserve more budget based on ROAS and volume.
3) Flag areas where we should reduce bids or budgets.
4) Propose 3–5 concrete reallocation actions with estimated impact.

Expected outcome: a prioritised list of reallocation opportunities, usually revealing 5–15% of spend that can be quickly redirected without increasing risk.

Use Claude to Design Clear Bid Strategies Per Channel

Next, move from observations to codified bid strategies. For each major channel (e.g. Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn), feed Claude your KPIs, business constraints, and historical patterns. Ask it to recommend which bidding strategies (tROAS, tCPA, Maximise Conversions, etc.) and target levels best fit each campaign type (brand, generic, competitor, remarketing).

Include examples of past changes you’ve made and their impact so Claude can learn from your context. Have it return a structured playbook describing when to switch strategies, how to set initial targets, and how to adjust them over time. This document becomes the backbone of your paid media governance.

Example prompt for bid strategy design:
You are helping us redesign our bidding strategy.

Context:
- Business goal: maximise profitable revenue at a blended ROAS of 4.0.
- Constraints: do not exceed a blended CPA of 60 EUR.
- Here is a summary of performance by campaign type and channel.

Tasks:
1) Propose recommended bidding strategies for each campaign type.
2) Suggest initial target ROAS/CPA ranges.
3) Describe when we should switch a campaign to a different strategy.
4) Provide a short, easy-to-follow playbook structure our team can adopt.

Expected outcome: a channel- and campaign-specific bidding playbook that your marketers can reference when configuring or scaling campaigns.

Generate Budget Reallocation Scenarios with Claude

Once you have a baseline and bid strategy, use Claude to build budget reallocation scenarios. Provide aggregated data by campaign or audience and specify the total budget you can move. Ask Claude to simulate different distributions, such as concentrating spend on top performers vs. spreading it more evenly, and to estimate the impact on volume and efficiency.

Make Claude explain its assumptions explicitly (e.g. linear vs. non-linear returns, expected saturation) and suggest KPIs to monitor during live tests. You can then implement one of the proposed scenarios in your ad platforms as a controlled experiment.

Example prompt for budget scenarios:
You are a marketing finance copilot.

Goal:
- Reallocate 20% of our current paid search budget without increasing risk.

Inputs:
- Table with campaign, current_budget, conversions, revenue, roas, cpa.

Tasks:
1) Create three budget reallocation scenarios:
   a) Aggressive growth
   b) Balanced
   c) Risk-averse
2) For each scenario, show new budgets by campaign and expected impact
   on total conversions, revenue, ROAS, and CPA.
3) Recommend which scenario we should test first and why.

Expected outcome: 2–3 realistic alternative budget plans with clear trade-offs that can be A/B tested or sequentially trialed in your ad accounts.

Codify Guardrails and Alert Rules with Claude

Use Claude to convert fuzzy risk concerns into explicit guardrails and alert rules. Share examples of days or weeks where performance deteriorated and ask Claude to identify early signals that could have triggered intervention: sudden CPC jumps, conversion rate drops, changes in device mix, or anomalies in specific audiences.

Then have Claude draft monitoring rules you can implement using platform scripts, BI dashboards, or simple spreadsheet checks. It should specify exact thresholds, lookback windows, and recommended actions (pause, cap budget, or tighten targets).

Example prompt for guardrail design:
You are helping us design risk controls for our ad accounts.

Inputs:
- Examples of dates and campaigns with very poor performance.
- Our current risk appetite: we accept up to 10% daily variance in ROAS.

Tasks:
1) Identify early warning signals that typically precede bad days.
2) Propose concrete monitoring rules with numeric thresholds.
3) For each rule, specify the automatic or manual action to take.
4) Output the rules in a table we can easily hand over to our ops team.

Expected outcome: a practical set of risk controls that can be implemented as scripts or checks, reducing the downside risk of increased automation.

Turn Claude’s Insights into Repeatable Weekly Workflows

To move beyond one-off audits, embed Claude into your weekly optimization rituals. Standardise prompts and inputs so every week your team runs the same analyses: top budget misallocations, campaigns eligible for more investment, underperformers to fix or pause, and potential test ideas.

Store your best prompts in a shared library and refine them based on experience. Integrate Claude outputs directly into your existing planning formats (e.g. weekly performance docs, sprint boards), so the AI’s recommendations translate into concrete tasks with owners and deadlines.

Example weekly workflow prompt:
You are our weekly paid media optimization assistant.

Goal this week:
- Maintain ROAS >= 3.8 while testing growth opportunities.

Inputs:
- Updated performance extract (last 7 and last 30 days).
- Last week's action log (changes we made).

Tasks:
1) Summarise key trends and anomalies.
2) List the top 10 actions we should take this week, labelled as
   "Scale", "Fix", or "Test".
3) For each action, estimate potential impact and urgency.
4) Flag any risks or data quality issues you see.

Expected outcome: a consistent, AI-supported optimisation routine that can reduce manual analysis time by 30–50% while making budget and bid decisions more data-driven and less ad hoc.

Use a PoC to Validate the Approach Before Full Rollout

Before rebuilding your entire marketing operating model, run a contained AI proof of concept. Select one or two key channels and a limited number of campaigns. With Reruption’s 9.900€ AI PoC approach, you can define a narrow scope (e.g. “use Claude to optimise budget allocation and bid strategy for our core search and remarketing campaigns”), prototype the workflows above, and measure impact on ROAS and team effort.

Within a few weeks, you’ll know if the Claude-based governance and decision-support layer works in your environment, what integration steps are needed, and how to scale it responsibly. Many organisations see 5–15% efficiency improvements and a noticeable reduction in “spreadsheet time” even at this early stage.

Expected outcomes: clearer bid and budget strategies, 5–15% better efficiency on targeted campaigns, and 30–50% less manual analysis time for the scoped area, with a concrete roadmap for scaling the approach across channels.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude does not push buttons in Google Ads or Meta directly. Instead, it acts as a powerful analysis and decision-support layer. You feed it performance data (spend, ROAS, CPA, conversions, etc.), business goals, and constraints. Claude then identifies misallocations, proposes bid strategy adjustments, and suggests specific budget reallocation actions with reasoning. Your team uses these outputs to update platform settings or to refine automated bidding and pacing rules, replacing manual gut-feel tweaks with structured, AI-backed decisions.

You don’t need a full data science team to benefit from Claude, but you do need three things: someone who can export and prepare performance data from your ad platforms, a marketer who understands your business KPIs and can explain them clearly, and a point person willing to experiment with and refine prompts. Basic familiarity with spreadsheets and ad platform metrics is enough to start.

Reruption typically supports clients by setting up the initial data flows, designing a prompt library tailored to their accounts, and training the marketing team on how to interpret and operationalise Claude’s recommendations. Over time, ownership shifts fully to your in-house team.

On a practical level, you can see value from Claude within days: a first account audit often reveals quick-win budget reallocations that improve ROAS or CPA almost immediately. More structural benefits — like a coherent bidding playbook, risk guardrails, and embedded weekly workflows — typically emerge over 4–8 weeks.

If you run a focused proof of concept on a subset of campaigns, you should be able to measure clear impact on efficiency and team workload within one or two optimisation cycles, assuming normal learning periods for automated bidding systems.

Claude itself is relatively inexpensive compared to ad spend and headcount costs. The main investment is in setting up the workflows and training your team. In return, organisations usually unlock 5–15% better efficiency on the campaigns where Claude-guided optimisation is applied, simply by reallocating budgets and adjusting bids more intelligently.

On top of performance gains, marketing teams often reclaim a significant amount of time previously spent on manual analysis and reactive changes. That time can be redirected to strategy, creative testing, and cross-channel planning, which further improves the overall ROI of your marketing budget.

Reruption supports you across the full journey from idea to working solution. With our 9.900€ AI PoC, we first validate that using Claude for your specific ad accounts and data setup is technically and commercially feasible. We define the use case, prototype the key workflows (audits, bid strategy design, budget reallocation scenarios, guardrails), and measure performance and effort impact.

Beyond the PoC, our Co-Preneur approach means we don’t just advise; we embed alongside your team to ship real automations, prompt libraries, and governance processes. We operate inside your P&L and workflows, helping you move from manual bid and budget tuning to a scalable, AI-first operating model for your marketing spend.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media