The Challenge: Unreliable Forecasting Accuracy

Marketing teams are under constant pressure to commit to numbers—pipeline, revenue contribution, lead volumes, ROAS—often months in advance. Yet the underlying forecasting models sit in brittle spreadsheets, stitched together from last year’s numbers, rough growth assumptions, and manual adjustments. Seasonality, campaign mix, new channels, and macro shocks rarely make it into the model in a structured way, which means the forecast is more negotiation than analysis.

Traditional approaches struggle because they were never designed for today’s data volume and channel complexity. A spreadsheet can’t easily incorporate multi-channel time series data, shifting attribution windows, or rapid experiments across dozens of audiences and creatives. Static trend lines ignore seasonality, promotions, and saturation effects. Manual updates are slow, error-prone, and biased by the loudest stakeholder in the room rather than the underlying data. As a result, the more digital your marketing becomes, the less your old forecasting setup keeps up.

The business impact is real. Inaccurate forecasts create inventory and capacity problems, misaligned expectations with sales and finance, and over- or under-investment in key channels. Over-optimistic pipeline projections drive aggressive hiring and media commitments that never pay off; overly conservative forecasts cause you to miss growth windows and lose share to competitors who deploy capital more confidently. Reporting becomes defensive—explaining misses—rather than proactive steering of budget and strategy.

Yet this is a solvable problem. With modern AI models and tools like Gemini integrated into Google Ads, Analytics and BigQuery, marketing teams can build forecasting pipelines that actually reflect reality: seasonality, campaign mix, and changing user behavior. At Reruption, we’ve seen how AI-first approaches can replace fragile spreadsheet logic with robust, explainable models that finance can trust and marketers can act on. In the rest of this page, you’ll find practical guidance to move from unreliable forecasts to AI-driven marketing planning.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI-first analytics and forecasting solutions, we see the same pattern repeatedly: the data to fix forecasting exists, but the workflow to use it does not. Gemini, tightly integrated with Google Ads, Google Analytics and BigQuery, is a strong fit for marketing teams that want to turn raw channel data into reliable, explainable forecasts without building a data science department from scratch. Our perspective is simple: treat Gemini not as a magic black box, but as an intelligent layer on top of a clear data model, robust pipelines, and well-defined business questions.

Anchor Forecasting in Business Questions, Not in Tools

Before switching on any Gemini-based forecasting, clarify what you actually need to predict and why. Are you forecasting MQLs, SQLs, revenue, or spend and ROAS by channel? Do you need weekly or monthly granularity? Are the forecasts for budget planning, capacity planning, or board reporting? Without this clarity, even the best AI models will optimize for the wrong outcomes.

Strategically, this means bringing marketing, sales, and finance together to define target metrics, forecast horizons, and acceptable error ranges. Gemini can then be configured and prompted around these shared definitions. This alignment step is often skipped, but it is exactly what turns AI forecasts from an interesting experiment into a trusted planning instrument.

Treat Data Foundations as Part of the Marketing Strategy

Reliable forecasts depend on consistent, well-modeled data from your key platforms. Many teams view BigQuery schemas, UTM standards and conversion tracking as technical hygiene topics; in practice they are strategic levers. If different markets or teams tag campaigns differently, Gemini will see noisy signals and produce noisy forecasts.

From a strategic point of view, marketing leadership should explicitly sponsor a data foundation initiative: define a unified campaign taxonomy, standardize event and conversion tracking in Google Analytics, and ensure all major channels land in BigQuery at a daily cadence. Only then can Gemini detect real patterns—seasonality, lagged effects, cannibalization—rather than local data quirks.

Adopt a Test-and-Learn Mindset for Forecasting Models

Forecasting accuracy is not a one-off project; it’s a continuous learning system. With AI-powered forecasting using Gemini, you can and should run multiple model variants in parallel: different feature sets, forecast horizons, or channel groupings. Instead of betting everything on a single model, treat your forecasting stack as a portfolio of hypotheses.

Organizationally, this requires a mindset shift. Forecasts are no longer static commitments but living artifacts that improve as you add data and refine assumptions. Governance should focus on how models are evaluated, when they’re recalibrated, and how changes are communicated to stakeholders. Gemini makes it relatively easy to iterate on models; the real work is embedding that iteration into your planning rhythm.

Prepare the Team for Explainable AI, Not Just Better Numbers

Finance and sales don’t just want numbers; they want to understand them. If your team can’t explain why the new AI-driven forecast for paid search is materially lower than last year, stakeholders will revert to gut feeling. Gemini’s strength is not only in generating predictions, but in helping marketers surface drivers and scenarios in natural language.

Strategically, invest in upskilling: teach your marketers and analysts how to ask Gemini the right questions about channel contributions, seasonal patterns, and scenario impacts. Create a standard ritual where forecast reviews include “explain this forecast” segments driven by Gemini, translating model logic into business language. This builds trust and reduces resistance to AI-based planning.

Design Risk Mitigation Around Forecast Use, Not Just Model Error

The real risk with unreliable forecasting is not a 5–10% error margin—it’s when decisions are made assuming zero uncertainty. With Gemini in the loop, you can introduce confidence intervals, pessimistic and optimistic scenarios, and anomaly detection that warns you when actuals diverge from predicted ranges.

At a strategic level, define guardrails: How much variance from forecast triggers a spend reallocation discussion? When do you freeze hiring plans despite optimistic models? Gemini can continuously monitor performance vs. forecast and flag anomalies; leadership needs to define the playbooks that follow those alerts. This combination of AI monitoring and clear decision rules dramatically reduces downside risk while letting you be more ambitious with growth bets.

Using Gemini for marketing forecasting is not about replacing your team with a model; it’s about giving them a reliable, explainable view of the future so they can allocate budget and focus where it matters. When Gemini sits on top of clean Google Ads, Analytics and BigQuery data, it can model seasonality, channel mix and campaign dynamics in a way spreadsheets never could. At Reruption, we work hands-on with teams to design these AI-first forecasting pipelines and embed them into real planning processes. If you’re ready to move beyond guesswork and make forecasts your competitive advantage, we’re happy to explore what that could look like in your environment.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Biotech to Healthcare: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Insilico Medicine

Biotech

The drug discovery process traditionally spans 10-15 years and costs upwards of $2-3 billion per approved drug, with over 90% failure rate in clinical trials due to poor efficacy, toxicity, or ADMET issues. In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a fatal lung disease with limited treatments like pirfenidone and nintedanib, the need for novel therapies is urgent, but identifying viable targets and designing effective small molecules remains arduous, relying on slow high-throughput screening of existing libraries. Key challenges include target identification amid vast biological data, de novo molecule generation beyond screened compounds, and predictive modeling of properties to reduce wet-lab failures. Insilico faced skepticism on AI's ability to deliver clinically viable candidates, regulatory hurdles for AI-discovered drugs, and integration of AI with experimental validation.

Lösung

Insilico deployed its end-to-end Pharma.AI platform, integrating generative AI and deep learning for accelerated discovery. PandaOmics used multimodal deep learning on omics data to nominate novel targets like TNIK kinase for IPF, prioritizing based on disease relevance and druggability. Chemistry42 employed generative models (GANs, reinforcement learning) to design de novo molecules, generating and optimizing millions of novel structures with desired properties, while InClinico predicted preclinical outcomes. This AI-driven pipeline overcame traditional limitations by virtual screening vast chemical spaces and iterating designs rapidly. Validation through hybrid AI-wet lab approaches ensured robust candidates like ISM001-055 (Rentosertib).

Ergebnisse

  • Time from project start to Phase I: 30 months (vs. 5+ years traditional)
  • Time to IND filing: 21 months
  • First generative AI drug to enter Phase II human trials (2023)
  • Generated/optimized millions of novel molecules de novo
  • Preclinical success: Potent TNIK inhibition, efficacy in IPF models
  • USAN naming for Rentosertib: March 2025, Phase II ongoing
Read case study →

Duke Health

Healthcare

Sepsis is a leading cause of hospital mortality, affecting over 1.7 million Americans annually with a 20-30% mortality rate when recognized late. At Duke Health, clinicians faced the challenge of early detection amid subtle, non-specific symptoms mimicking other conditions, leading to delayed interventions like antibiotics and fluids. Traditional scoring systems like qSOFA or NEWS suffered from low sensitivity (around 50-60%) and high false alarms, causing alert fatigue in busy wards and EDs. Additionally, integrating AI into real-time clinical workflows posed risks: ensuring model accuracy on diverse patient data, gaining clinician trust, and complying with regulations without disrupting care. Duke needed a custom, explainable model trained on its own EHR data to avoid vendor biases and enable seamless adoption across its three hospitals.

Lösung

Duke's Sepsis Watch is a deep learning model leveraging real-time EHR data (vitals, labs, demographics) to continuously monitor hospitalized patients and predict sepsis onset 6 hours in advance with high precision. Developed by the Duke Institute for Health Innovation (DIHI), it triggers nurse-facing alerts (Best Practice Advisories) only when risk exceeds thresholds, minimizing fatigue. The model was trained on Duke-specific data from 250,000+ encounters, achieving AUROC of 0.935 at 3 hours prior and 88% sensitivity at low false positive rates. Integration via Epic EHR used a human-centered design, involving clinicians in iterations to refine alerts and workflows, ensuring safe deployment without overriding clinical judgment.

Ergebnisse

  • AUROC: 0.935 for sepsis prediction 3 hours prior
  • Sensitivity: 88% at 3 hours early detection
  • Reduced time to antibiotics: 1.2 hours faster
  • Alert override rate: <10% (high clinician trust)
  • Sepsis bundle compliance: Improved by 20%
  • Mortality reduction: Associated with 12% drop in sepsis deaths
Read case study →

Unilever

Human Resources

Unilever, a consumer goods giant handling 1.8 million job applications annually, struggled with a manual recruitment process that was extremely time-consuming and inefficient . Traditional methods took up to four months to fill positions, overburdening recruiters and delaying talent acquisition across its global operations . The process also risked unconscious biases in CV screening and interviews, limiting workforce diversity and potentially overlooking qualified candidates from underrepresented groups . High volumes made it impossible to assess every applicant thoroughly, leading to high costs estimated at millions annually and inconsistent hiring quality . Unilever needed a scalable, fair system to streamline early-stage screening while maintaining psychometric rigor.

Lösung

Unilever adopted an AI-powered recruitment funnel partnering with Pymetrics for neuroscience-based gamified assessments that measure cognitive, emotional, and behavioral traits via ML algorithms trained on diverse global data . This was followed by AI-analyzed video interviews using computer vision and NLP to evaluate body language, facial expressions, tone of voice, and word choice objectively . Applications were anonymized to minimize bias, with AI shortlisting top 10-20% of candidates for human review, integrating psychometric ML models for personality profiling . The system was piloted in high-volume entry-level roles before global rollout .

Ergebnisse

  • Time-to-hire: 90% reduction (4 months to 4 weeks)
  • Recruiter time saved: 50,000 hours
  • Annual cost savings: £1 million
  • Diversity hires increase: 16% (incl. neuro-atypical candidates)
  • Candidates shortlisted for humans: 90% reduction
  • Applications processed: 1.8 million/year
Read case study →

NYU Langone Health

Healthcare

NYU Langone Health, a leading academic medical center, faced significant hurdles in leveraging the vast amounts of unstructured clinical notes generated daily across its network. Traditional clinical predictive models relied heavily on structured data like lab results and vitals, but these required complex ETL processes that were time-consuming and limited in scope. Unstructured notes, rich with nuanced physician insights, were underutilized due to challenges in natural language processing, hindering accurate predictions of critical outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and operational events like insurance denials. Clinicians needed real-time, scalable tools to identify at-risk patients early, but existing models struggled with the volume and variability of EHR data—over 4 million notes spanning a decade. This gap led to reactive care, increased costs, and suboptimal patient outcomes, prompting the need for an innovative approach to transform raw text into actionable foresight.

Lösung

To address these challenges, NYU Langone's Division of Applied AI Technologies at the Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science developed NYUTron, a proprietary large language model (LLM) specifically trained on internal clinical notes. Unlike off-the-shelf models, NYUTron was fine-tuned on unstructured EHR text from millions of encounters, enabling it to serve as an all-purpose prediction engine for diverse tasks. The solution involved pre-training a 13-billion-parameter LLM on over 10 years of de-identified notes (approximately 4.8 million inpatient notes), followed by task-specific fine-tuning. This allowed seamless integration into clinical workflows, automating risk flagging directly from physician documentation without manual data structuring. Collaborative efforts, including AI 'Prompt-a-Thons,' accelerated adoption by engaging clinicians in model refinement.

Ergebnisse

  • AUROC: 0.961 for 48-hour mortality prediction (vs. 0.938 benchmark)
  • 92% accuracy in identifying high-risk patients from notes
  • LOS prediction AUROC: 0.891 (5.6% improvement over prior models)
  • Readmission prediction: AUROC 0.812, outperforming clinicians in some tasks
  • Operational predictions (e.g., insurance denial): AUROC up to 0.85
  • 24 clinical tasks with superior performance across mortality, LOS, and comorbidities
Read case study →

Zalando

E-commerce

In the online fashion retail sector, high return rates—often exceeding 30-40% for apparel—stem primarily from fit and sizing uncertainties, as customers cannot physically try on items before purchase . Zalando, Europe's largest fashion e-tailer serving 27 million active customers across 25 markets, faced substantial challenges with these returns, incurring massive logistics costs, environmental impact, and customer dissatisfaction due to inconsistent sizing across over 6,000 brands and 150,000+ products . Traditional size charts and recommendations proved insufficient, with early surveys showing up to 50% of returns attributed to poor fit perception, hindering conversion rates and repeat purchases in a competitive market . This was compounded by the lack of immersive shopping experiences online, leading to hesitation among tech-savvy millennials and Gen Z shoppers who demanded more personalized, visual tools.

Lösung

Zalando addressed these pain points by deploying a generative computer vision-powered virtual try-on solution, enabling users to upload selfies or use avatars to see realistic garment overlays tailored to their body shape and measurements . Leveraging machine learning models for pose estimation, body segmentation, and AI-generated rendering, the tool predicts optimal sizes and simulates draping effects, integrating with Zalando's ML platform for scalable personalization . The system combines computer vision (e.g., for landmark detection) with generative AI techniques to create hyper-realistic visualizations, drawing from vast datasets of product images, customer data, and 3D scans, ultimately aiming to cut returns while enhancing engagement . Piloted online and expanded to outlets, it forms part of Zalando's broader AI ecosystem including size predictors and style assistants.

Ergebnisse

  • 30,000+ customers used virtual fitting room shortly after launch
  • 5-10% projected reduction in return rates
  • Up to 21% fewer wrong-size returns via related AI size tools
  • Expanded to all physical outlets by 2023 for jeans category
  • Supports 27 million customers across 25 European markets
  • Part of AI strategy boosting personalization for 150,000+ products
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Unify Your Marketing Data Pipeline into BigQuery First

Before you ask Gemini to forecast anything, ensure all key marketing data flows into BigQuery with consistent schemas and timestamps. Connect Google Ads, Google Analytics 4, and other major platforms via native connectors or ETL tools, and standardize fields such as campaign name, channel grouping, country, and primary KPI (e.g., conversions, revenue, qualified leads).

A practical implementation sequence: (1) Define a canonical "campaign performance" table structure in BigQuery; (2) Map each source platform’s fields into that schema; (3) Create daily incremental loads; (4) Add a validation query that checks row counts and freshness; (5) Only then give Gemini access to that curated dataset rather than to raw, inconsistent tables.

Use Gemini to Prototype Forecasting Logic in Natural Language

Instead of jumping straight into complex SQL or code, leverage Gemini’s natural language interface to prototype forecasting logic and explore patterns. Provide it with a description of your BigQuery schema and ask it to propose forecasting approaches, relevant features and seasonality considerations for your specific KPIs.

Example prompt you can adapt in Vertex AI or the Gemini interface:

You are a senior marketing analyst helping build a forecast model.
We have a BigQuery table `mkt_campaign_performance` with daily data:
- date (DATE)
- channel (STRING) -- e.g. 'Paid Search', 'Paid Social', 'Email'
- country (STRING)
- spend (FLOAT)
- impressions (INT64)
- clicks (INT64)
- conversions (INT64)
- revenue (FLOAT)

Task:
1. Analyze which features and transformations we should use to forecast
   next 90 days of conversions by channel and country.
2. Identify potential seasonality (weekly, monthly, yearly) and how to model it.
3. Propose a step-by-step plan to implement this forecast using BigQuery + Gemini.
4. Suggest SQL examples or pseudo-code where useful.

Use Gemini’s answer as a design draft, then refine and validate with your data team. This approach shortens the time from idea to first working model.

Build Reusable Forecast Views and Let Gemini Explain Them

Create dedicated forecast views in BigQuery (e.g., mkt_forecast_weekly) that hold historicals plus forecasted values per channel, market, and KPI. Structure them with fields like date, channel, kpi, actual_value, forecast_value, lower_bound, upper_bound, and model_version. This makes it easy for Gemini to query and comment on forecasts in a standardized way.

Then use Gemini to generate natural-language summaries that non-technical stakeholders can consume. For instance, run a prompt against the view:

You are a marketing planning copilot.
We have a BigQuery view `mkt_forecast_weekly` with columns:
- week_start (DATE)
- channel (STRING)
- kpi (STRING) -- e.g. 'conversions', 'revenue'
- actual_value (FLOAT)
- forecast_value (FLOAT)
- lower_bound (FLOAT)
- upper_bound (FLOAT)
- model_version (STRING)

1. Summarize the next 12 weeks of forecast for 'conversions' by channel.
2. Highlight where actuals over the last 4 weeks are outside forecast bounds.
3. Provide a concise, CMO-ready explanation of key risks and opportunities
   we should discuss in the next planning meeting.

This practice turns raw forecast tables into directly usable intelligence, reducing time spent preparing slides and commentary.

Use Gemini to Automate Scenario Planning and Budget Reallocation

Once the base forecast is stable, use Gemini for scenario modeling: "What happens if we increase paid search spend by 20% in DACH but cut paid social by 15% in the US?" Rather than building dozens of separate spreadsheet versions, encode simple response curves or elasticity assumptions in BigQuery and let Gemini orchestrate the scenario logic.

Example prompt to drive scenario analysis:

You are an AI assistant for marketing budget planning.
We have:
- Historical performance in `mkt_campaign_performance` (BigQuery)
- A baseline forecast in `mkt_forecast_weekly`

Assumptions:
- For Paid Search, each +10% spend change impacts conversions by +6%
  up to a 30% increase, then with diminishing returns.
- For Paid Social, each +10% spend change impacts conversions by +4%
  up to a 20% increase.

Task:
1. Simulate the impact on conversions and revenue over the next 8 weeks
   if we:
   - Increase Paid Search spend by 20% in DACH
   - Decrease Paid Social spend by 15% in US
2. Compare the scenario vs baseline forecast.
3. Provide a recommended budget shift summary for the CMO.

By standardizing a small set of such prompts and assumptions, you create a repeatable, AI-powered budgeting workflow that is faster and more transparent than manual spreadsheet simulations.

Implement Anomaly Detection on Forecast vs. Actuals

To avoid drift and catch issues early, configure a simple monitoring layer where Gemini checks variance between actuals and forecasts on a daily or weekly basis. Start with a BigQuery job that calculates absolute and percentage deltas, flags records exceeding your defined thresholds, and writes them into an "anomalies" table.

Then use Gemini to turn that table into actionable alerts and narratives. For example:

You are monitoring marketing performance vs forecast.
BigQuery table `mkt_forecast_anomalies` has:
- date
- channel
- kpi
- forecast_value
- actual_value
- abs_delta
- pct_delta

1. Identify the top 5 anomalies by absolute impact on revenue this week.
2. For each, suggest 2-3 plausible causes based on channel behavior
   (e.g., tracking issues, campaign paused, creative fatigue, seasonality).
3. Propose next diagnostic steps marketing should take.

This practice turns your forecasting system into an early warning radar, not just a one-way prediction engine.

Close the Loop: Feed Back Campaign Changes into Gemini

Finally, make sure Gemini always sees the full picture of your interventions. If you radically change bidding strategies, launch major new creatives, or expand to new geos, log these changes in a "campaign events" table in BigQuery (e.g., with columns like date, channel, event_type, description). Include these events as features in your forecasting models and as context in your Gemini prompts.

Over time, this feedback loop lets Gemini distinguish structural shifts from noise, improving forecast stability. It also gives you a living history of "what we changed, when, and with what effect", which is invaluable for planning and for explaining forecast adjustments to executives.

When these best practices are implemented, marketing teams typically see meaningful improvements in forecast reliability: error margins shrinking by 15–30%, earlier detection of underperforming channels, and faster budget reallocation cycles (often from quarterly to monthly or bi-weekly). The result is not perfect foresight, but a marketing organization that can act on data with much higher confidence.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini improves forecasting accuracy by sitting directly on top of your Google Ads, Google Analytics and BigQuery data and analyzing full time series, not just simple spreadsheet trends. It can incorporate seasonality, channel mix, geography, device type, and campaign changes into a single model, rather than separate, manual calculations.

In practice, that means moving from “last year +10%” to AI-driven models that learn how different channels behave over time, detect structural shifts, and output forecasts with confidence intervals. Gemini also helps explain why a forecast changed (e.g., lower brand search volume, new product launch, reduced email frequency), which builds trust with finance and sales stakeholders.

You don’t need a full data science team, but you do need some data and analytics maturity. At minimum, you should have: (1) reliable tracking in Google Analytics, (2) advertising data from major platforms flowing into BigQuery, and (3) someone who can manage basic SQL and data modeling. With that in place, Gemini can handle much of the heavy lifting around pattern detection, feature engineering ideas, and explanation.

From a team perspective, involve a performance marketer, a data/analytics owner, and a stakeholder from finance or sales operations. Reruption often fills the AI engineering gap in the beginning—designing the data model, building the initial pipelines, and setting up Gemini workflows—so your team can focus on decisions rather than on infrastructure.

Assuming your core marketing data is already flowing into BigQuery and Google Analytics, teams typically see a first working Gemini-based forecast within a few weeks. A realistic timeline is: 1–2 weeks to align on metrics, forecast horizons and data quality; another 1–2 weeks to build initial models and views; and 2–4 weeks of iteration to calibrate accuracy and embed the forecasts into planning meetings.

That means you can usually use AI-enhanced forecasts for the next quarterly or seasonal planning cycle. The accuracy then improves over subsequent months as the models ingest more data, you refine features, and you close the loop between forecasts, actuals, and campaign changes.

Gemini itself is priced as a usage-based cloud service, so your direct AI cost is typically modest compared to media spend—often a fraction of a percent of your marketing budget. The larger investment is in setting up clean data pipelines, forecast views, and operational workflows around AI outputs.

ROI comes from better decisions: fewer over-committed campaigns that miss targets, earlier detection of underperforming channels, and more confident budget shifts toward high-ROAS activities. Even small improvements in forecast accuracy (for example, reducing error by 15–20%) can translate into significant budget savings or incremental revenue when you’re managing six- or seven-figure quarterly spends. We usually frame ROI in terms of avoided misallocation and captured upside, not just tooling cost.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur inside your organization: we don’t just recommend using Gemini, we help build the actual forecasting engine with your team. Our AI PoC offering (9,900€) is often the first step—we scope a concrete forecasting use case (e.g., leads or revenue by channel), validate technical feasibility, and deliver a working prototype hooked into your Google and BigQuery setup.

From there, we support hands-on implementation: designing the data model, building BigQuery pipelines, configuring Gemini workflows, and embedding forecasts into your planning and reporting routines. Because we operate in your P&L and not just in slide decks, the focus is always on measurable impact—more reliable forecasts, better budget decisions, and a marketing organization that can rerupt its own processes instead of waiting for disruption from outside.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media