The Challenge: Fragmented Campaign Data

Marketing teams run campaigns across Meta, Google, LinkedIn, programmatic, email, CRM journeys, and website personalization. Each platform produces its own reports, definitions, and naming conventions. The result: fragmented campaign data that makes it painfully hard to answer basic questions like which channels actually drive revenue, which audiences are profitable, or what to cut from next month’s budget.

Traditional approaches rely on manual exports, VLOOKUP-heavy Excel files, and BI dashboards that are always one step behind reality. Every platform measures impressions, clicks, conversions, and revenue slightly differently. UTM structures are inconsistent, campaigns are renamed mid-flight, and offline conversions are stitched on top as an afterthought. Even sophisticated data warehouses struggle when the underlying marketing data model is inconsistent and constantly changing.

The business impact is substantial. Teams spend hours every week just collecting and cleaning data instead of optimizing campaigns. Budget decisions are made on partial or conflicting views, leading to overspending on underperforming channels and underinvesting in high-ROI segments. Leadership loses confidence in the numbers when basic metrics don’t match between dashboards and platform reports, weakening marketing’s credibility and slowing strategic decisions.

This challenge is real, especially as marketing stacks grow and privacy regulations reshape tracking. But it is solvable. With modern AI for marketing analytics, you don’t need to rebuild your entire data stack to get a unified view. At Reruption, we’ve seen how tools like Claude can sit on top of existing exports, harmonize metrics and naming, and surface clear, omnichannel insights in days—not months. The rest of this page walks through concrete ways to do that in your own team.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From our work building AI-first analytics workflows, we’ve learned that the quickest way to tame fragmented campaign data isn’t another monolithic BI project—it’s adding an intelligent layer on top. Used correctly, Claude can read exports from your ad platforms, CRM, and analytics tools, align them to a common structure, and generate reliable, explainable views of performance. Reruption’s hands-on experience implementing AI solutions for marketing teams shows that this combination of lightweight engineering and AI-assisted analysis can transform reporting from reactive spreadsheet work into proactive decision-making.

Think of Claude as an Analytics Layer, Not a Magic Box

The first strategic shift is to see Claude for marketing analytics as a flexible analytics layer on top of your existing stack, not as a replacement for it. Your ad platforms, CRM, and web analytics remain the systems of record. Claude becomes the intelligence that reads, harmonizes, and explains what’s happening across them.

This mindset keeps expectations realistic and adoption smoother. You use Claude to standardize naming, reconcile metrics, and summarize omnichannel performance, while maintaining traceability back to the original sources. Strategically, this also reduces risk: if Claude’s output looks off, you can always inspect the underlying files and refine prompts or schemas rather than ripping out existing tools.

Start with One Clear Decision You Want to Improve

Instead of “fixing all analytics,” anchor your Claude initiative around one specific decision, such as monthly budget allocation or weekly channel performance review. This forces alignment on the metrics that matter (e.g., CAC, ROAS, revenue per session, lead-to-opportunity rate) and the level of granularity you actually need.

By scoping tightly, you avoid endless debates about perfect data models and can test how Claude handles your real-world mess: inconsistent UTMs, renamed campaigns, and gaps in conversion tracking. Once you see tangible impact—clearer budget decisions, faster reporting—you earn the internal mandate to expand into other analytics use cases.

Prepare Your Team for Human-in-the-Loop Analytics

Claude works best when marketers stay in the loop as reviewers and decision-makers, not passive consumers of AI dashboards. Strategically, this means setting expectations that AI-driven marketing analytics will surface patterns, highlight anomalies, and reconcile naming—but humans still validate key insights and act on them.

Build rituals around this: for example, a weekly session where the team reviews Claude’s omnichannel summary, challenges any surprising findings, and refines prompts or mapping rules. Over time, your marketers become comfortable collaborating with AI, and your analytics quality improves as Claude is “trained” on your specific business logic.

Design for Transparency and Explainability from Day One

For leadership to trust AI-assisted reporting, they must understand how numbers are produced. Strategically, that means asking Claude not only for finalized tables and summaries, but also for explanations of its assumptions: how it mapped channel names, which conversions it included, how it handled missing or conflicting data.

Incorporate this into your operating model: require that every AI-generated report comes with a short “data assumptions” note. This lowers the perceived risk of using Claude for sensitive topics like revenue attribution and helps your data team stay comfortable with the new workflow.

Mitigate Risks with Guardrails and Data Governance

Using Claude on campaign data is powerful, but it must be done with clear guardrails. Strategically, define what data Claude is allowed to see (e.g., aggregated performance exports rather than raw PII), how files are stored, and who can run which prompts. This is especially important for teams operating under strict data protection and compliance requirements.

Combine Claude with lightweight governance: standardized export templates, clear naming rules, and documented prompt libraries. Reruption often helps clients set up these guardrails during early pilots so that when AI usage scales, it does so within a controlled, compliant framework rather than as a shadow IT experiment.

Used with the right strategy, Claude transforms fragmented campaign data from a weekly reporting headache into a reliable, explainable source of marketing insight. It doesn’t replace your stack; it makes sense of it. If you want to explore how Claude could sit on top of your current tools to harmonize metrics, standardize naming, and support better budget decisions, Reruption can help—from a focused AI PoC to embedded implementation with our Co-Preneur approach. Reach out when you’re ready to see this running on your own real data, not just in slideware.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Payments to Financial Services: Learn how companies successfully use Claude.

Mastercard

Payments

In the high-stakes world of digital payments, card-testing attacks emerged as a critical threat to Mastercard's ecosystem. Fraudsters deploy automated bots to probe stolen card details through micro-transactions across thousands of merchants, validating credentials for larger fraud schemes. Traditional rule-based and machine learning systems often detected these only after initial tests succeeded, allowing billions in annual losses and disrupting legitimate commerce. The subtlety of these attacks—low-value, high-volume probes mimicking normal behavior—overwhelmed legacy models, exacerbated by fraudsters' use of AI to evade patterns. As transaction volumes exploded post-pandemic, Mastercard faced mounting pressure to shift from reactive to proactive fraud prevention. False positives from overzealous alerts led to declined legitimate transactions, eroding customer trust, while sophisticated attacks like card-testing evaded detection in real-time. The company needed a solution to identify compromised cards preemptively, analyzing vast networks of interconnected transactions without compromising speed or accuracy.

Lösung

Mastercard's Decision Intelligence (DI) platform integrated generative AI with graph-based machine learning to revolutionize fraud detection. Generative AI simulates fraud scenarios and generates synthetic transaction data, accelerating model training and anomaly detection by mimicking rare attack patterns that real data lacks. Graph technology maps entities like cards, merchants, IPs, and devices as interconnected nodes, revealing hidden fraud rings and propagation paths in transaction graphs. This hybrid approach processes signals at unprecedented scale, using gen AI to prioritize high-risk patterns and graphs to contextualize relationships. Implemented via Mastercard's AI Garage, it enables real-time scoring of card compromise risk, alerting issuers before fraud escalates. The system combats card-testing by flagging anomalous testing clusters early. Deployment involved iterative testing with financial institutions, leveraging Mastercard's global network for robust validation while ensuring explainability to build issuer confidence.

Ergebnisse

  • 2x faster detection of potentially compromised cards
  • Up to 300% boost in fraud detection effectiveness
  • Doubled rate of proactive compromised card notifications
  • Significant reduction in fraudulent transactions post-detection
  • Minimized false declines on legitimate transactions
  • Real-time processing of billions of transactions
Read case study →

Walmart (Marketplace)

Retail

In the cutthroat arena of Walmart Marketplace, third-party sellers fiercely compete for the Buy Box, which accounts for the majority of sales conversions . These sellers manage vast inventories but struggle with manual pricing adjustments, which are too slow to keep pace with rapidly shifting competitor prices, demand fluctuations, and market trends. This leads to frequent loss of the Buy Box, missed sales opportunities, and eroded profit margins in a platform where price is the primary battleground . Additionally, sellers face data overload from monitoring thousands of SKUs, predicting optimal price points, and balancing competitiveness against profitability. Traditional static pricing strategies fail in this dynamic e-commerce environment, resulting in suboptimal performance and requiring excessive manual effort—often hours daily per seller . Walmart recognized the need for an automated solution to empower sellers and drive platform growth.

Lösung

Walmart launched the Repricer, a free AI-driven automated pricing tool integrated into Seller Center, leveraging generative AI for decision support alongside machine learning models like sequential decision intelligence to dynamically adjust prices in real-time . The tool analyzes competitor pricing, historical sales data, demand signals, and market conditions to recommend and implement optimal prices that maximize Buy Box eligibility and sales velocity . Complementing this, the Pricing Insights dashboard provides account-level metrics and AI-generated recommendations, including suggested prices for promotions, helping sellers identify opportunities without manual analysis . For advanced users, third-party tools like Biviar's AI repricer—commissioned by Walmart—enhance this with reinforcement learning for profit-maximizing daily pricing decisions . This ecosystem shifts sellers from reactive to proactive pricing strategies.

Ergebnisse

  • 25% increase in conversion rates from dynamic AI pricing
  • Higher Buy Box win rates through real-time competitor analysis
  • Maximized sales velocity for 3rd-party sellers on Marketplace
  • 850 million catalog data improvements via GenAI (broader impact)
  • 40%+ conversion boost potential from AI-driven offers
  • Reduced manual pricing time by hours daily per seller
Read case study →

Khan Academy

Education

Khan Academy faced the monumental task of providing personalized tutoring at scale to its 100 million+ annual users, many in under-resourced areas. Traditional online courses, while effective, lacked the interactive, one-on-one guidance of human tutors, leading to high dropout rates and uneven mastery. Teachers were overwhelmed with planning, grading, and differentiation for diverse classrooms. In 2023, as AI advanced, educators grappled with hallucinations and over-reliance risks in tools like ChatGPT, which often gave direct answers instead of fostering learning. Khan Academy needed an AI that promoted step-by-step reasoning without cheating, while ensuring equitable access as a nonprofit. Scaling safely across subjects and languages posed technical and ethical hurdles.

Lösung

Khan Academy developed Khanmigo, an AI-powered tutor and teaching assistant built on GPT-4, piloted in March 2023 for teachers and expanded to students. Unlike generic chatbots, Khanmigo uses custom prompts to guide learners Socratically—prompting questions, hints, and feedback without direct answers—across math, science, humanities, and more. The nonprofit approach emphasized safety guardrails, integration with Khan's content library, and iterative improvements via teacher feedback. Partnerships like Microsoft enabled free global access for teachers by 2024, now in 34+ languages. Ongoing updates, such as 2025 math computation enhancements, address accuracy challenges.

Ergebnisse

  • User Growth: 68,000 (2023-24 pilot) to 700,000+ (2024-25 school year)
  • Teacher Adoption: Free for teachers in most countries, millions using Khan Academy tools
  • Languages Supported: 34+ for Khanmigo
  • Engagement: Improved student persistence and mastery in pilots
  • Time Savings: Teachers save hours on lesson planning and prep
  • Scale: Integrated with 429+ free courses in 43 languages
Read case study →

BMW (Spartanburg Plant)

Automotive Manufacturing

The BMW Spartanburg Plant, the company's largest globally producing X-series SUVs, faced intense pressure to optimize assembly processes amid rising demand for SUVs and supply chain disruptions. Traditional manufacturing relied heavily on human workers for repetitive tasks like part transport and insertion, leading to worker fatigue, error rates up to 5-10% in precision tasks, and inefficient resource allocation. With over 11,500 employees handling high-volume production, scheduling shifts and matching workers to tasks manually caused delays and cycle time variability of 15-20%, hindering output scalability. Compounding issues included adapting to Industry 4.0 standards, where rigid robotic arms struggled with flexible tasks in dynamic environments. Labor shortages post-pandemic exacerbated this, with turnover rates climbing, and the need to redeploy skilled workers to value-added roles while minimizing downtime. Machine vision limitations in older systems failed to detect subtle defects, resulting in quality escapes and rework costs estimated at millions annually.

Lösung

BMW partnered with Figure AI to deploy Figure 02 humanoid robots integrated with machine vision for real-time object detection and ML scheduling algorithms for dynamic task allocation. These robots use advanced AI to perceive environments via cameras and sensors, enabling autonomous navigation and manipulation in human-robot collaborative settings. ML models predict production bottlenecks, optimize robot-worker scheduling, and self-monitor performance, reducing human oversight. Implementation involved pilot testing in 2024, where robots handled repetitive tasks like part picking and insertion, coordinated via a central AI orchestration platform. This allowed seamless integration into existing lines, with digital twins simulating scenarios for safe rollout. Challenges like initial collision risks were overcome through reinforcement learning fine-tuning, achieving human-like dexterity.

Ergebnisse

  • 400% increase in robot speed post-trials
  • 7x higher task success rate
  • Reduced cycle times by 20-30%
  • Redeployed 10-15% of workers to skilled tasks
  • $1M+ annual cost savings from efficiency gains
  • Error rates dropped below 1%
Read case study →

IBM

Technology

In a massive global workforce exceeding 280,000 employees, IBM grappled with high employee turnover rates, particularly among high-performing and top talent. The cost of replacing a single employee—including recruitment, onboarding, and lost productivity—can exceed $4,000-$10,000 per hire, amplifying losses in a competitive tech talent market. Manually identifying at-risk employees was nearly impossible amid vast HR data silos spanning demographics, performance reviews, compensation, job satisfaction surveys, and work-life balance metrics. Traditional HR approaches relied on exit interviews and anecdotal feedback, which were reactive and ineffective for prevention. With attrition rates hovering around industry averages of 10-20% annually, IBM faced annual costs in the hundreds of millions from rehiring and training, compounded by knowledge loss and morale dips in a tight labor market. The challenge intensified as retaining scarce AI and tech skills became critical for IBM's innovation edge.

Lösung

IBM developed a predictive attrition ML model using its Watson AI platform, analyzing 34+ HR variables like age, salary, overtime, job role, performance ratings, and distance from home from an anonymized dataset of 1,470 employees. Algorithms such as logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and gradient boosting were trained to flag employees with high flight risk, achieving 95% accuracy in identifying those likely to leave within six months. The model integrated with HR systems for real-time scoring, triggering personalized interventions like career coaching, salary adjustments, or flexible work options. This data-driven shift empowered CHROs and managers to act proactively, prioritizing top performers at risk.

Ergebnisse

  • 95% accuracy in predicting employee turnover
  • Processed 1,470+ employee records with 34 variables
  • 93% accuracy benchmark in optimized Extra Trees model
  • Reduced hiring costs by averting high-value attrition
  • Potential annual savings exceeding $300M in retention (reported)
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Standardize Your Data Exports Before They Reach Claude

The quality of Claude’s analysis depends heavily on the consistency of the inputs. Before involving AI, define a minimal set of standard export templates for your main platforms (e.g., Google Ads, Meta Ads, LinkedIn, email, CRM, web analytics). Ensure each export includes dates, campaign/ad set/ad names, spend, impressions, clicks, key conversions, and revenue where available.

Use a simple internal guideline: same time zone, same date format, same currency, and, if possible, the same column headers across platforms for similar metrics. This reduces the time Claude spends guessing mappings and increases the reliability of the unified view.

Example instruction to your team:
Export weekly data for <week_start> - <week_end> from:
- Google Ads: Campaign performance report, include cost, clicks, conversions, conversion value
- Meta Ads: Campaign performance report, same metrics
- CRM: Opportunities created/closed with campaign or UTM source/medium
- Analytics: Sessions, transactions, revenue by source/medium/campaign
Save all as CSV with UTF-8 encoding and identical date range.

Use Claude to Build a Cross-Channel Naming and Metric Map

Once you have exports, the first tactical step is to let Claude create a “data dictionary” that harmonizes channel naming and metrics. Upload a few representative CSVs and ask Claude to identify equivalent dimensions and metrics across platforms and propose a unified schema.

Example prompt for schema harmonization:
You are a marketing data analyst. I will upload CSV exports from multiple platforms.
Tasks:
1) Detect which columns represent similar concepts (e.g., campaign name, ad group, cost, impressions, clicks, conversions, revenue).
2) Propose a unified schema with standard column names and data types.
3) Suggest mapping rules for each platform to this unified schema.
4) Identify any ambiguities or conflicts and ask clarifying questions.
Output the schema and mappings in a clear markdown table.

Use Claude’s suggested schema as the foundation for future exports and automations. Over time, you can refine this mapping and even codify it into scripts or ETL jobs that pre-transform data before sending it to Claude.

Let Claude Merge Spreadsheets and Resolve Conflicts Explicitly

Instead of manually copying and pasting between sheets, use Claude to merge campaign spreadsheets and highlight discrepancies. Upload your standardized exports and instruct Claude to join them on agreed keys (e.g., date + campaign name or date + UTM parameters), then surface conflicts.

Example prompt for merging and conflict detection:
You are helping me build an omnichannel marketing performance table.
I will upload:
- Google Ads weekly export
- Meta Ads weekly export
- CRM opportunities with campaign / UTM info
- Web analytics sessions and revenue by source/medium/campaign
Tasks:
1) Join these datasets on date and campaign (or UTM) where possible.
2) Create a combined table with columns: date, channel, campaign, spend, clicks,
   sessions, leads, opportunities, revenue.
3) Highlight any conflicts (e.g., different revenue figures for same campaign/date)
   and propose how to reconcile or flag them.
4) Provide the final table as CSV text I can paste into a sheet.

This workflow turns a multi-hour manual task into minutes, while still letting you review and refine how conflicts are handled before using the data for decisions.

Automate Weekly Performance Summaries and Anomaly Detection

Once merged tables are in place, use Claude to generate consistent weekly marketing performance summaries with anomaly detection. Provide the unified dataset and ask Claude to compare against previous periods, identify outliers, and propose hypotheses for changes.

Example prompt for weekly summary:
You are my marketing analytics assistant. Here is a CSV with unified performance data
for the last 8 weeks. Columns include: date, channel, campaign, spend, clicks,
conversions, revenue.
Tasks:
1) Summarize performance for the latest week vs. the previous 4-week average by channel.
2) Highlight significant anomalies (e.g., >30% change in CPA, ROAS, or conversion rate).
3) Suggest 3-5 hypotheses for the most important anomalies.
4) Recommend 3 concrete optimization actions for next week.

Over time, you can standardize this prompt and combine it with a simple automation (e.g., export + upload workflow) so every Monday the team reviews a consistent AI-generated performance brief instead of manually assembling one.

Create Executive-Ready Views Without Rebuilding Dashboards

Executives often need a simplified, narrative view of marketing performance across channels. Rather than creating and maintaining separate decks, use Claude to turn your merged data into concise executive summaries, tailored to non-technical audiences.

Example prompt for executive summary:
You are writing for a CMO who has 10 minutes to review performance.
Using the attached unified performance CSV, please:
1) Provide a 1-page narrative summary of overall performance this month vs. last month.
2) Focus on revenue, CAC, ROAS, and any major shifts by channel.
3) Use clear, non-technical language.
4) Add a short bullet list of key risks and opportunities.
5) Include a simple table with only the 5 most important metrics.

This reduces the time your senior marketers spend “translating” analytics into business language, while still letting them edit and refine the story before sharing.

Capture and Reuse Successful Prompts as Internal Playbooks

As your team iterates, some prompts will consistently deliver high-quality analysis (e.g., for budget reallocation recommendations or channel-level deep dives). Don’t let this live only in personal chats—turn them into shared playbooks.

Example internal playbook entry:
Playbook: Channel Budget Reallocation
Use when: Planning next month’s budget.
Prompt:
You are a performance marketing strategist. Using the attached unified performance
CSV for the last 60 days, please:
1) Calculate CAC and ROAS by channel and campaign.
2) Identify underperforming campaigns that should be paused or reduced.
3) Propose a reallocation of the same total budget across channels to maximize
   expected revenue, explaining your assumptions.
4) Present results as a table and a short narrative.

Documenting and sharing these prompts turns Claude into a repeatable team capability instead of a one-off experiment owned by a single power user.

Implemented together, these practices typically reduce manual reporting time by 30–50%, accelerate weekly performance reviews from hours to minutes, and improve confidence in cross-channel budget decisions. The exact metrics will vary by organisation, but the pattern is consistent: less time wrestling spreadsheets, more time optimizing campaigns based on a unified, AI-assisted view.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude can read exports from your ad platforms, CRM, and analytics tools and act as an intelligent layer on top of them. It can harmonize metric names (e.g., cost vs. spend), align dimensions like campaign and channel, and merge multiple CSVs into a single unified table.

On top of that, Claude can summarize omnichannel performance, highlight anomalies, and produce decision-ready views for budget allocation and channel optimization—without you having to build a full data warehouse or complex BI model first.

You don’t need a full data engineering team to get value from Claude. Practically, you need:

  • Someone who can export consistent CSVs from your main tools (ad platforms, CRM, analytics).
  • At least one marketer comfortable experimenting with clear, structured prompts.
  • Basic internal guidelines for data access and privacy compliance.

Reruption often helps clients define export templates, initial prompts, and simple governance rules so that marketers can safely use Claude without waiting for a large IT project.

Because Claude works on top of your existing exports, timelines are short. Many teams see a first useful unified performance view within days, not months. A typical pattern is:

  • Week 1: Define key decisions, set up export templates, run first merged reports with Claude.
  • Weeks 2–3: Refine schemas, prompts, and conflict resolution rules; start weekly AI-generated summaries.
  • By 4–6 weeks: Embed Claude into recurring reporting and budget planning rituals.

The exact pace depends on how fragmented your current data is, but you should expect tangible improvements in reporting speed and clarity within the first month.

ROI typically comes from two areas: time saved and smarter spend. On the efficiency side, teams often cut manual reporting and spreadsheet work by 30–50%, freeing marketers to focus on creative and strategic tasks. On the effectiveness side, clearer cross-channel visibility supports better budget allocation—shifting spend from underperforming campaigns to those with higher ROAS or better lead quality.

While numbers vary, many organisations see enough value from a single improved budget cycle to justify the effort of setting up Claude as a marketing analytics assistant.

Reruption supports you end-to-end. With our AI PoC offering (9.900€), we can quickly validate that Claude can handle your specific mix of ad platforms, CRM, and analytics exports—delivering a working prototype that merges data, harmonizes metrics, and produces real reports.

Beyond the PoC, our Co-Preneur approach means we embed with your team, define use-case scope and metrics, design prompts and workflows, and build the light engineering and guardrails needed to run this in production. We don’t just advise; we work with your marketers in their tools and P&L until a robust AI-assisted analytics workflow is live.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media