The Challenge: Manual Absence and Leave Queries

In most organisations, HR business partners and shared-service teams still spend a disproportionate amount of time answering repetitive absence and leave questions. Employees want to know how many vacation days they have left, which public holidays apply to their location, how to record sick days, or which approval rules apply to parental leave. Every question turns into an email, chat, or ticket that someone in HR needs to read, interpret, and answer manually.

Traditional approaches like static FAQ pages, PDF policy handbooks, or generic ticketing portals no longer work. Employees rarely have the time or patience to dig through 40-page documents or intranet pages that are often outdated, hard to search, and inconsistent across regions. Even when self-service exists, it is usually disconnected from the HRIS leave balances and local policies, so employees still fall back on “I’ll just ask HR” as the fastest path to an answer.

The result is a constant stream of low-complexity queries that clog HR inboxes and service queues. Response times suffer, especially at peak times like year-end, summer, or around new policy rollouts. HR teams lose capacity for strategic work such as workforce planning, talent development, and engagement initiatives. Inconsistent manual answers across regions and individuals introduce compliance risk and undermine trust in HR as a reliable source of truth.

The good news: this problem is highly automatable. Modern AI assistants can understand natural-language questions, read policy documents, reference local calendars, and even connect to HR systems to surface relevant balances and workflows. At Reruption, we’ve seen how AI-powered chat and automation can transform repetitive interactions in HR and adjacent functions. The rest of this page walks through how you can use Gemini to turn manual absence and leave queries into a robust, employee-friendly self-service experience.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI assistants, internal chatbots, and workflow automations, we’ve seen that manual leave queries are one of the fastest wins for HR automation with Gemini. Gemini’s tight integration with Google Workspace and APIs makes it well-suited to read policy docs, interpret regional rules, and surface clear, consistent answers directly where employees already work — Gmail, Chat, or your intranet. But to get real impact, you need more than a chatbot; you need a thoughtful design of policy data, access control, and HR processes around it.

Define a Clear Scope Before You Automate Everything

The temptation with a powerful model like Gemini for HR is to make it answer every HR question from day one. For absence and leave, that usually backfires. Start by defining a narrow but high-volume scope: vacation and paid time off balances, sick leave rules, local public holidays, and basic approval flows. This gives the model a clean problem space and makes it easier to test accuracy and adoption.

Once you have evidence that Gemini reliably handles these core manual absence and leave queries, you can expand into adjacent topics such as parental leave, sabbaticals, or travel policies. A staged rollout also helps you secure buy-in from HR, Legal, and Works Council stakeholders by showing that the assistant respects policies and doesn’t improvise answers.

Treat HR Policies as a Product, Not Just Documents

Most organisations treat leave policies as static PDFs or intranet pages. When you introduce a Gemini-powered HR assistant, those documents become the de facto knowledge base. If the content is ambiguous, outdated, or contradictory across regions, the assistant will reflect that. Strategic success depends on treating policy content as a product: version-controlled, structured, and reviewed with AI consumption in mind.

Invest time upfront to consolidate global and local rules, clarify edge cases, and agree on a single source of truth per topic. Reruption often works with HR and Legal to redesign policy content into AI-friendly formats and tagging schemes, so Gemini can reliably distinguish between, for example, Germany vs. Spain rules, or blue-collar vs. white-collar entitlements.

Align HR, IT, and Data Protection Early

Implementing Gemini for HR self-service is not just a tooling decision; it is an organisational change touching data access, compliance, and employee experience. HR might own the process, but IT, Security, and Data Protection (especially in a European and German context) must be aligned on where data lives, which connectors are used, and how access controls work.

Strategically, you need clear answers to questions like: Should Gemini see real-time leave balances from the HRIS, or only policy and process information? How do we separate personal data from general policy content? Who is accountable if an AI answer is wrong? Agreeing on these boundaries early reduces implementation friction and builds trust in the system. Reruption’s focus on Security & Compliance means we design these architectures with legal and risk teams, not around them.

Design for Transparency and Escalation, Not Full Automation

A sustainable approach to AI in HR support acknowledges that not every leave question should be fully automated. Some cases are sensitive (e.g., long-term illness, special leave for personal events) or require human judgment. Strategically, the assistant should be designed as a smart front door: it resolves standard queries instantly but also knows when to escalate.

That means implementing visible guardrails: the assistant explains what data it uses, when it might be uncertain, and how to connect to a human HR contact. Escalation workflows can collect structured information from the employee (dates, location, contract type) and pass it to HR, reducing back-and-forth. This preserves human oversight while still cutting a significant portion of manual work.

Measure Impact Beyond Ticket Volume

It’s easy to declare success when ticket numbers drop, but strategic value from Gemini-based HR assistants goes deeper. Define metrics upfront that reflect both operational efficiency and employee experience: first-response time, percentage of queries fully resolved by AI, employee satisfaction with answers, and HR time reallocated to higher-value work.

We often recommend running A/B or pre/post comparisons: for example, measuring average handling time for leave queries before and after launching the assistant, or tracking how many complex cases HR can handle once low-level noise is reduced. These metrics help you refine the assistant over time and justify further investment in AI across HR.

Using Gemini to automate manual absence and leave queries is one of the most pragmatic ways to free HR capacity while improving the employee experience. When you define a clear scope, clean up policy content, and align stakeholders on compliance and escalation, Gemini becomes a reliable first line of support rather than a risky experiment. Reruption brings the combination of AI engineering and HR process understanding needed to design, prototype, and scale such assistants quickly; if you’re exploring this space, we’re happy to co-create a focused proof of concept and turn it into a working solution inside your existing HR landscape.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From EdTech to Telecommunications: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Duolingo

EdTech

Duolingo, a leader in gamified language learning, faced key limitations in providing real-world conversational practice and in-depth feedback. While its bite-sized lessons built vocabulary and basics effectively, users craved immersive dialogues simulating everyday scenarios, which static exercises couldn't deliver . This gap hindered progression to fluency, as learners lacked opportunities for free-form speaking and nuanced grammar explanations without expensive human tutors. Additionally, content creation was a bottleneck. Human experts manually crafted lessons, slowing the rollout of new courses and languages amid rapid user growth. Scaling personalized experiences across 40+ languages demanded innovation to maintain engagement without proportional resource increases . These challenges risked user churn and limited monetization in a competitive EdTech market.

Lösung

Duolingo launched Duolingo Max in March 2023, a premium subscription powered by GPT-4, introducing Roleplay for dynamic conversations and Explain My Answer for contextual feedback . Roleplay simulates real-life interactions like ordering coffee or planning vacations with AI characters, adapting in real-time to user inputs. Explain My Answer provides detailed breakdowns of correct/incorrect responses, enhancing comprehension. Complementing this, Duolingo's Birdbrain LLM (fine-tuned on proprietary data) automates lesson generation, allowing experts to create content 10x faster . This hybrid human-AI approach ensured quality while scaling rapidly, integrated seamlessly into the app for all skill levels .

Ergebnisse

  • DAU Growth: +59% YoY to 34.1M (Q2 2024)
  • DAU Growth: +54% YoY to 31.4M (Q1 2024)
  • Revenue Growth: +41% YoY to $178.3M (Q2 2024)
  • Adjusted EBITDA Margin: 27.0% (Q2 2024)
  • Lesson Creation Speed: 10x faster with AI
  • User Self-Efficacy: Significant increase post-AI use (2025 study)
Read case study →

Three UK

Telecommunications

Three UK, a leading mobile telecom operator in the UK, faced intense pressure from surging data traffic driven by 5G rollout, video streaming, online gaming, and remote work. With over 10 million customers, peak-hour congestion in urban areas led to dropped calls, buffering during streams, and high latency impacting gaming experiences. Traditional monitoring tools struggled with the volume of big data from network probes, making real-time optimization impossible and risking customer churn. Compounding this, legacy on-premises systems couldn't scale for 5G network slicing and dynamic resource allocation, resulting in inefficient spectrum use and OPEX spikes. Three UK needed a solution to predict and preempt network bottlenecks proactively, ensuring low-latency services for latency-sensitive apps while maintaining QoS across diverse traffic types.

Lösung

Microsoft Azure Operator Insights emerged as the cloud-based AI platform tailored for telecoms, leveraging big data machine learning to ingest petabytes of network telemetry in real-time. It analyzes KPIs like throughput, packet loss, and handover success to detect anomalies and forecast congestion. Three UK integrated it with their core network for automated insights and recommendations. The solution employed ML models for root-cause analysis, traffic prediction, and optimization actions like beamforming adjustments and load balancing. Deployed on Azure's scalable cloud, it enabled seamless migration from legacy tools, reducing dependency on manual interventions and empowering engineers with actionable dashboards.

Ergebnisse

  • 25% reduction in network congestion incidents
  • 20% improvement in average download speeds
  • 15% decrease in end-to-end latency
  • 30% faster anomaly detection
  • 10% OPEX savings on network ops
  • Improved NPS by 12 points
Read case study →

bunq

Banking

As bunq experienced rapid growth as the second-largest neobank in Europe, scaling customer support became a critical challenge. With millions of users demanding personalized banking information on accounts, spending patterns, and financial advice on demand, the company faced pressure to deliver instant responses without proportionally expanding its human support teams, which would increase costs and slow operations. Traditional search functions in the app were insufficient for complex, contextual queries, leading to inefficiencies and user frustration. Additionally, ensuring data privacy and accuracy in a highly regulated fintech environment posed risks. bunq needed a solution that could handle nuanced conversations while complying with EU banking regulations, avoiding hallucinations common in early GenAI models, and integrating seamlessly without disrupting app performance. The goal was to offload routine inquiries, allowing human agents to focus on high-value issues.

Lösung

bunq addressed these challenges by developing Finn, a proprietary GenAI platform integrated directly into its mobile app, replacing the traditional search function with a conversational AI chatbot. After hiring over a dozen data specialists in the prior year, the team built Finn to query user-specific financial data securely, answer questions on balances, transactions, budgets, and even provide general advice while remembering conversation context across sessions. Launched as Europe's first AI-powered bank assistant in December 2023 following a beta, Finn evolved rapidly. By May 2024, it became fully conversational, enabling natural back-and-forth interactions. This retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach grounded responses in real-time user data, minimizing errors and enhancing personalization.

Ergebnisse

  • 100,000+ questions answered within months post-beta (end-2023)
  • 40% of user queries fully resolved autonomously by mid-2024
  • 35% of queries assisted, totaling 75% immediate support coverage
  • Hired 12+ data specialists pre-launch for data infrastructure
  • Second-largest neobank in Europe by user base (1M+ users)
Read case study →

Unilever

Human Resources

Unilever, a consumer goods giant handling 1.8 million job applications annually, struggled with a manual recruitment process that was extremely time-consuming and inefficient . Traditional methods took up to four months to fill positions, overburdening recruiters and delaying talent acquisition across its global operations . The process also risked unconscious biases in CV screening and interviews, limiting workforce diversity and potentially overlooking qualified candidates from underrepresented groups . High volumes made it impossible to assess every applicant thoroughly, leading to high costs estimated at millions annually and inconsistent hiring quality . Unilever needed a scalable, fair system to streamline early-stage screening while maintaining psychometric rigor.

Lösung

Unilever adopted an AI-powered recruitment funnel partnering with Pymetrics for neuroscience-based gamified assessments that measure cognitive, emotional, and behavioral traits via ML algorithms trained on diverse global data . This was followed by AI-analyzed video interviews using computer vision and NLP to evaluate body language, facial expressions, tone of voice, and word choice objectively . Applications were anonymized to minimize bias, with AI shortlisting top 10-20% of candidates for human review, integrating psychometric ML models for personality profiling . The system was piloted in high-volume entry-level roles before global rollout .

Ergebnisse

  • Time-to-hire: 90% reduction (4 months to 4 weeks)
  • Recruiter time saved: 50,000 hours
  • Annual cost savings: £1 million
  • Diversity hires increase: 16% (incl. neuro-atypical candidates)
  • Candidates shortlisted for humans: 90% reduction
  • Applications processed: 1.8 million/year
Read case study →

Ford Motor Company

Manufacturing

In Ford's automotive manufacturing plants, vehicle body sanding and painting represented a major bottleneck. These labor-intensive tasks required workers to manually sand car bodies, a process prone to inconsistencies, fatigue, and ergonomic injuries due to repetitive motions over hours . Traditional robotic systems struggled with the variability in body panels, curvatures, and material differences, limiting full automation in legacy 'brownfield' facilities . Additionally, achieving consistent surface quality for painting was critical, as defects could lead to rework, delays, and increased costs. With rising demand for electric vehicles (EVs) and production scaling, Ford needed to modernize without massive CapEx or disrupting ongoing operations, while prioritizing workforce safety and upskilling . The challenge was to integrate scalable automation that collaborated with humans seamlessly.

Lösung

Ford addressed this by deploying AI-guided collaborative robots (cobots) equipped with machine vision and automation algorithms. In the body shop, six cobots use cameras and AI to scan car bodies in real-time, detecting surfaces, defects, and contours with high precision . These systems employ computer vision models for 3D mapping and path planning, allowing cobots to adapt dynamically without reprogramming . The solution emphasized a workforce-first brownfield strategy, starting with pilot deployments in Michigan plants. Cobots handle sanding autonomously while humans oversee quality, reducing injury risks. Partnerships with robotics firms and in-house AI development enabled low-code inspection tools for easy scaling .

Ergebnisse

  • Sanding time: 35 seconds per full car body (vs. hours manually)
  • Productivity boost: 4x faster assembly processes
  • Injury reduction: 70% fewer ergonomic strains in cobot zones
  • Consistency improvement: 95% defect-free surfaces post-sanding
  • Deployment scale: 6 cobots operational, expanding to 50+ units
  • ROI timeline: Payback in 12-18 months per plant
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Centralise Policy Content into an AI-Ready Knowledge Base

The first tactical step to automate absence and leave queries with Gemini is to consolidate your policies into a structured, searchable knowledge base. Gather all relevant documents: global leave policies, local annexes, works council agreements, public holiday calendars, and HR FAQ pages. Remove duplicates, align terminology, and tag each section by country, employee group, and contract type.

In Google Workspace, store these in a dedicated Drive folder with clear naming conventions and share settings. Then configure Gemini (via extensions or custom integration) to index only this curated folder. This reduces the risk of the model pulling outdated drafts from random folders and ensures that every answer is grounded in an approved source.

Design Robust Prompts and System Instructions for HR Use

To get consistent, compliant responses, define a persistent system prompt for your Gemini HR assistant. This prompt should encode your tone of voice, escalation rules, and how to handle uncertainty. For example, when implementing a chatbot in your intranet or Google Chat, your backend would inject a stable system instruction with every request.

Example system prompt for Gemini:
You are an internal HR leave assistant for ACME GmbH.

Your tasks:
- Answer questions about vacation, sick leave, parental leave, and public holidays.
- Use ONLY the official policy documents and calendars provided to you.
- Always specify when rules differ by country, location, or employee group.
- If you are not certain or the situation seems exceptional, say so clearly and
  suggest contacting HR via the official channel with a short explanation.
- Do NOT make up legal interpretations or commitments.
- Answer in clear, friendly, professional language and keep responses concise.

Iterate on this prompt based on real conversations. Monitor where Gemini overconfidently answers ambiguous questions and adjust instructions to push those into escalation instead of guesswork.

Connect to HRIS or Payroll for Balance and Holiday Data

Employees don’t just want to know the rules; they want to know their own leave balance and applicable holidays. Where technically and legally feasible, integrate Gemini with your HRIS or payroll system via APIs or export files. The assistant can then retrieve, for example, remaining vacation days or upcoming public holidays for the employee’s location.

A common pattern is a thin middleware service: it authenticates the user (e.g., via Google identity), looks up their employee ID, fetches balance and calendar information from the HRIS, and passes those values into Gemini’s context. Gemini then combines static policy text with dynamic data. This keeps sensitive operations in your own infrastructure while still giving the assistant personalised answers.

Example context passed to Gemini:
"employee_country": "DE",
"employee_region": "BW",
"employee_contract_type": "full-time",
"vacation_days_total": 30,
"vacation_days_taken": 18,
"vacation_days_remaining": 12,
"next_public_holidays": ["2025-01-01", "2025-01-06"]

Embed the Assistant Where Employees Already Ask HR

Adoption depends on convenience. Instead of launching yet another portal, put your Gemini leave assistant in the channels employees already use: Google Chat, Gmail side panels, your intranet, or the HR service portal. In Google Workspace, you can expose a Gemini-powered chatbot as a Chat app, or as a custom web component embedded in your intranet.

For example, configure a Google Chat space called “Ask HR – Leave & Absence” where users can DM the bot. Or add a widget on your intranet’s HR page with a clear call-to-action: “Ask about your vacation, sick leave, and holidays.” The fewer context switches needed, the more queries will flow through the assistant instead of email.

Implement Logging, Feedback, and Continuous Improvement

To maintain quality and compliance, instrument your Gemini HR chatbot with logging and feedback loops. Store anonymised conversation transcripts (respecting data protection rules) and mark which responses were rated helpful vs. unhelpful by employees. Provide a simple feedback control after each answer: “Was this answer helpful? Yes / No – Add comment”.

On a regular cadence, HR and the AI team should review low-rated answers, identify patterns (e.g., missing policy edge cases, ambiguous wording, unclear escalation paths), and update both the knowledge base and the system prompt. This turns the assistant into a living system that improves over time instead of degrading as policies change.

Define Concrete KPIs and Run a Pilot in One Region

Before scaling globally, run a 4–8 week pilot with a well-defined target group – for example, employees in one country or business unit. Define concrete KPIs: percentage reduction in manual leave tickets, average response time, AI resolution rate, and user satisfaction (via a short survey). Configure your ticketing tool so that all leave-related emails from the pilot group are redirected to the assistant first, with clear fallback options.

During the pilot, compare baseline metrics (before Gemini) with the new setup. For many organisations, realistic outcomes are a 30–60% reduction in standard leave tickets and a response time drop from days to seconds for simple queries. Use these numbers and qualitative feedback to refine the setup and build the case for broader rollout.

When implemented with these tactical best practices, a Gemini-powered HR assistant for absence and leave can realistically cut manual HR inquiries by double-digit percentages, improve answer consistency across regions, and free several hours per HR FTE per week for more strategic work. The exact impact will vary by organisation, but disciplined piloting, integration, and continuous improvement consistently turn leave queries into one of the most attractive entry points for AI in HR.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini is well-suited to handle most standardised leave queries that follow clear rules. Typical examples include: remaining vacation days, how to request time off, which public holidays apply to a location, how to record sick leave, or where to find forms and approval flows.

More complex, sensitive cases (e.g., long-term illness, special compassionate leave, or exceptional arrangements) should still be routed to human HR. We usually configure Gemini to recognise these patterns and suggest escalation rather than attempting a definitive answer.

A focused Gemini HR leave assistant can often be prototyped in a few weeks, assuming you already have digitised policy documents and access to your HRIS or payroll APIs. A typical timeline:

  • 1–2 weeks: Scope definition, policy consolidation, architecture design
  • 1–3 weeks: Technical integration (knowledge base, optional HRIS connection), prompt design
  • 2–4 weeks: Pilot rollout in one region or business unit, tuning based on feedback

The full duration depends on internal approvals (IT, Security, Works Council) and how complex your policy landscape is. Reruption’s PoC approach is designed to de-risk this phase and get a working prototype in front of users quickly.

To run a Gemini-powered HR support assistant effectively, you typically need:

  • HR process owners who understand your leave policies and edge cases
  • IT/engineering support to manage integrations (HRIS, identity, intranet)
  • Security/Data Protection to validate data flows and access controls
  • A product owner who treats the assistant as an evolving service, not a one-off project

If you lack in-house AI engineering capacity, partners like Reruption can provide the technical backbone and help your HR and IT teams learn how to maintain and evolve the solution over time.

The ROI comes from three areas: reduced manual workload in HR, faster and more consistent answers for employees, and lower risk of policy misinterpretation. In practice, companies often see a 30–60% reduction in standard leave-related tickets and a significant drop in response times for simple questions.

For example, if each HR FTE spends several hours per week on repetitive leave queries, automating a large portion of these can free dozens of hours per month across the team. This time can be reallocated to strategic HR initiatives. Upfront costs are primarily in integration and change management rather than licensing, so the payback period is usually measured in months, not years, once adoption is achieved.

Reruption combines AI engineering with deep experience building real-world assistants and automations in corporate environments. Our AI PoC offering (9,900€) is a structured way to test whether a Gemini-based HR leave assistant works in your specific context: we define the use case, design the architecture, build a working prototype, and measure performance and user impact.

Beyond the PoC, we apply our Co-Preneur approach: we embed with your HR, IT, and Security teams, act with entrepreneurial ownership, and build the assistant as if it were our own product. That includes policy restructuring, integration with your HRIS or Google Workspace, security and compliance design, pilot rollout, and enablement so your teams can operate and evolve the solution themselves.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media