The Challenge: Manual Absence and Leave Queries

In most organisations, HR business partners and shared-service teams still spend a disproportionate amount of time answering repetitive absence and leave questions. Employees want to know how many vacation days they have left, which public holidays apply to their location, how to record sick days, or which approval rules apply to parental leave. Every question turns into an email, chat, or ticket that someone in HR needs to read, interpret, and answer manually.

Traditional approaches like static FAQ pages, PDF policy handbooks, or generic ticketing portals no longer work. Employees rarely have the time or patience to dig through 40-page documents or intranet pages that are often outdated, hard to search, and inconsistent across regions. Even when self-service exists, it is usually disconnected from the HRIS leave balances and local policies, so employees still fall back on “I’ll just ask HR” as the fastest path to an answer.

The result is a constant stream of low-complexity queries that clog HR inboxes and service queues. Response times suffer, especially at peak times like year-end, summer, or around new policy rollouts. HR teams lose capacity for strategic work such as workforce planning, talent development, and engagement initiatives. Inconsistent manual answers across regions and individuals introduce compliance risk and undermine trust in HR as a reliable source of truth.

The good news: this problem is highly automatable. Modern AI assistants can understand natural-language questions, read policy documents, reference local calendars, and even connect to HR systems to surface relevant balances and workflows. At Reruption, we’ve seen how AI-powered chat and automation can transform repetitive interactions in HR and adjacent functions. The rest of this page walks through how you can use Gemini to turn manual absence and leave queries into a robust, employee-friendly self-service experience.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI assistants, internal chatbots, and workflow automations, we’ve seen that manual leave queries are one of the fastest wins for HR automation with Gemini. Gemini’s tight integration with Google Workspace and APIs makes it well-suited to read policy docs, interpret regional rules, and surface clear, consistent answers directly where employees already work — Gmail, Chat, or your intranet. But to get real impact, you need more than a chatbot; you need a thoughtful design of policy data, access control, and HR processes around it.

Define a Clear Scope Before You Automate Everything

The temptation with a powerful model like Gemini for HR is to make it answer every HR question from day one. For absence and leave, that usually backfires. Start by defining a narrow but high-volume scope: vacation and paid time off balances, sick leave rules, local public holidays, and basic approval flows. This gives the model a clean problem space and makes it easier to test accuracy and adoption.

Once you have evidence that Gemini reliably handles these core manual absence and leave queries, you can expand into adjacent topics such as parental leave, sabbaticals, or travel policies. A staged rollout also helps you secure buy-in from HR, Legal, and Works Council stakeholders by showing that the assistant respects policies and doesn’t improvise answers.

Treat HR Policies as a Product, Not Just Documents

Most organisations treat leave policies as static PDFs or intranet pages. When you introduce a Gemini-powered HR assistant, those documents become the de facto knowledge base. If the content is ambiguous, outdated, or contradictory across regions, the assistant will reflect that. Strategic success depends on treating policy content as a product: version-controlled, structured, and reviewed with AI consumption in mind.

Invest time upfront to consolidate global and local rules, clarify edge cases, and agree on a single source of truth per topic. Reruption often works with HR and Legal to redesign policy content into AI-friendly formats and tagging schemes, so Gemini can reliably distinguish between, for example, Germany vs. Spain rules, or blue-collar vs. white-collar entitlements.

Align HR, IT, and Data Protection Early

Implementing Gemini for HR self-service is not just a tooling decision; it is an organisational change touching data access, compliance, and employee experience. HR might own the process, but IT, Security, and Data Protection (especially in a European and German context) must be aligned on where data lives, which connectors are used, and how access controls work.

Strategically, you need clear answers to questions like: Should Gemini see real-time leave balances from the HRIS, or only policy and process information? How do we separate personal data from general policy content? Who is accountable if an AI answer is wrong? Agreeing on these boundaries early reduces implementation friction and builds trust in the system. Reruption’s focus on Security & Compliance means we design these architectures with legal and risk teams, not around them.

Design for Transparency and Escalation, Not Full Automation

A sustainable approach to AI in HR support acknowledges that not every leave question should be fully automated. Some cases are sensitive (e.g., long-term illness, special leave for personal events) or require human judgment. Strategically, the assistant should be designed as a smart front door: it resolves standard queries instantly but also knows when to escalate.

That means implementing visible guardrails: the assistant explains what data it uses, when it might be uncertain, and how to connect to a human HR contact. Escalation workflows can collect structured information from the employee (dates, location, contract type) and pass it to HR, reducing back-and-forth. This preserves human oversight while still cutting a significant portion of manual work.

Measure Impact Beyond Ticket Volume

It’s easy to declare success when ticket numbers drop, but strategic value from Gemini-based HR assistants goes deeper. Define metrics upfront that reflect both operational efficiency and employee experience: first-response time, percentage of queries fully resolved by AI, employee satisfaction with answers, and HR time reallocated to higher-value work.

We often recommend running A/B or pre/post comparisons: for example, measuring average handling time for leave queries before and after launching the assistant, or tracking how many complex cases HR can handle once low-level noise is reduced. These metrics help you refine the assistant over time and justify further investment in AI across HR.

Using Gemini to automate manual absence and leave queries is one of the most pragmatic ways to free HR capacity while improving the employee experience. When you define a clear scope, clean up policy content, and align stakeholders on compliance and escalation, Gemini becomes a reliable first line of support rather than a risky experiment. Reruption brings the combination of AI engineering and HR process understanding needed to design, prototype, and scale such assistants quickly; if you’re exploring this space, we’re happy to co-create a focused proof of concept and turn it into a working solution inside your existing HR landscape.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Healthcare to Healthcare: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

NYU Langone Health

Healthcare

NYU Langone Health, a leading academic medical center, faced significant hurdles in leveraging the vast amounts of unstructured clinical notes generated daily across its network. Traditional clinical predictive models relied heavily on structured data like lab results and vitals, but these required complex ETL processes that were time-consuming and limited in scope. Unstructured notes, rich with nuanced physician insights, were underutilized due to challenges in natural language processing, hindering accurate predictions of critical outcomes such as in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), readmissions, and operational events like insurance denials. Clinicians needed real-time, scalable tools to identify at-risk patients early, but existing models struggled with the volume and variability of EHR data—over 4 million notes spanning a decade. This gap led to reactive care, increased costs, and suboptimal patient outcomes, prompting the need for an innovative approach to transform raw text into actionable foresight.

Lösung

To address these challenges, NYU Langone's Division of Applied AI Technologies at the Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science developed NYUTron, a proprietary large language model (LLM) specifically trained on internal clinical notes. Unlike off-the-shelf models, NYUTron was fine-tuned on unstructured EHR text from millions of encounters, enabling it to serve as an all-purpose prediction engine for diverse tasks. The solution involved pre-training a 13-billion-parameter LLM on over 10 years of de-identified notes (approximately 4.8 million inpatient notes), followed by task-specific fine-tuning. This allowed seamless integration into clinical workflows, automating risk flagging directly from physician documentation without manual data structuring. Collaborative efforts, including AI 'Prompt-a-Thons,' accelerated adoption by engaging clinicians in model refinement.

Ergebnisse

  • AUROC: 0.961 for 48-hour mortality prediction (vs. 0.938 benchmark)
  • 92% accuracy in identifying high-risk patients from notes
  • LOS prediction AUROC: 0.891 (5.6% improvement over prior models)
  • Readmission prediction: AUROC 0.812, outperforming clinicians in some tasks
  • Operational predictions (e.g., insurance denial): AUROC up to 0.85
  • 24 clinical tasks with superior performance across mortality, LOS, and comorbidities
Read case study →

AstraZeneca

Healthcare

In the highly regulated pharmaceutical industry, AstraZeneca faced immense pressure to accelerate drug discovery and clinical trials, which traditionally take 10-15 years and cost billions, with low success rates of under 10%. Data silos, stringent compliance requirements (e.g., FDA regulations), and manual knowledge work hindered efficiency across R&D and business units. Researchers struggled with analyzing vast datasets from 3D imaging, literature reviews, and protocol drafting, leading to delays in bringing therapies to patients. Scaling AI was complicated by data privacy concerns, integration into legacy systems, and ensuring AI outputs were reliable in a high-stakes environment. Without rapid adoption, AstraZeneca risked falling behind competitors leveraging AI for faster innovation toward 2030 ambitions of novel medicines.

Lösung

AstraZeneca launched an enterprise-wide generative AI strategy, deploying ChatGPT Enterprise customized for pharma workflows. This included AI assistants for 3D molecular imaging analysis, automated clinical trial protocol drafting, and knowledge synthesis from scientific literature. They partnered with OpenAI for secure, scalable LLMs and invested in training: ~12,000 employees across R&D and functions completed GenAI programs by mid-2025. Infrastructure upgrades, like AMD Instinct MI300X GPUs, optimized model training. Governance frameworks ensured compliance, with human-in-loop validation for critical tasks. Rollout phased from pilots in 2023-2024 to full scaling in 2025, focusing on R&D acceleration via GenAI for molecule design and real-world evidence analysis.

Ergebnisse

  • ~12,000 employees trained on generative AI by mid-2025
  • 85-93% of staff reported productivity gains
  • 80% of medical writers found AI protocol drafts useful
  • Significant reduction in life sciences model training time via MI300X GPUs
  • High AI maturity ranking per IMD Index (top global)
  • GenAI enabling faster trial design and dose selection
Read case study →

PayPal

Fintech

PayPal processes millions of transactions hourly, facing rapidly evolving fraud tactics from cybercriminals using sophisticated methods like account takeovers, synthetic identities, and real-time attacks. Traditional rules-based systems struggle with false positives and fail to adapt quickly, leading to financial losses exceeding billions annually and eroding customer trust if legitimate payments are blocked . The scale amplifies challenges: with 10+ million transactions per hour, detecting anomalies in real-time requires analyzing hundreds of behavioral, device, and contextual signals without disrupting user experience. Evolving threats like AI-generated fraud demand continuous model retraining, while regulatory compliance adds complexity to balancing security and speed .

Lösung

PayPal implemented deep learning models for anomaly and fraud detection, leveraging machine learning to score transactions in milliseconds by processing over 500 signals including user behavior, IP geolocation, device fingerprinting, and transaction velocity. Models use supervised and unsupervised learning for pattern recognition and outlier detection, continuously retrained on fresh data to counter new fraud vectors . Integration with H2O.ai's Driverless AI accelerated model development, enabling automated feature engineering and deployment. This hybrid AI approach combines deep neural networks for complex pattern learning with ensemble methods, reducing manual intervention and improving adaptability . Real-time inference blocks high-risk payments pre-authorization, while low-risk ones proceed seamlessly .

Ergebnisse

  • 10% improvement in fraud detection accuracy on AI hardware
  • $500M fraudulent transactions blocked per quarter (~$2B annually)
  • AUROC score of 0.94 in fraud models (H2O.ai implementation)
  • 50% reduction in manual review queue
  • Processes 10M+ transactions per hour with <0.4ms latency
  • <0.32% fraud rate on $1.5T+ processed volume
Read case study →

HSBC

Banking

As a global banking titan handling trillions in annual transactions, HSBC grappled with escalating fraud and money laundering risks. Traditional systems struggled to process over 1 billion transactions monthly, generating excessive false positives that burdened compliance teams, slowed operations, and increased costs. Ensuring real-time detection while minimizing disruptions to legitimate customers was critical, alongside strict regulatory compliance in diverse markets. Customer service faced high volumes of inquiries requiring 24/7 multilingual support, straining resources. Simultaneously, HSBC sought to pioneer generative AI research for innovation in personalization and automation, but challenges included ethical deployment, human oversight for advancing AI, data privacy, and integration across legacy systems without compromising security. Scaling these solutions globally demanded robust governance to maintain trust and adhere to evolving regulations.

Lösung

HSBC tackled fraud with machine learning models powered by Google Cloud's Transaction Monitoring 360, enabling AI to detect anomalies and financial crime patterns in real-time across vast datasets. This shifted from rigid rules to dynamic, adaptive learning. For customer service, NLP-driven chatbots were rolled out to handle routine queries, provide instant responses, and escalate complex issues, enhancing accessibility worldwide. In parallel, HSBC advanced generative AI through internal research, sandboxes, and a landmark multi-year partnership with Mistral AI (announced December 2024), integrating tools for document analysis, translation, fraud enhancement, automation, and client-facing innovations—all under ethical frameworks with human oversight.

Ergebnisse

  • Screens over 1 billion transactions monthly for financial crime
  • Significant reduction in false positives and manual reviews (up to 60-90% in models)
  • Hundreds of AI use cases deployed across global operations
  • Multi-year Mistral AI partnership (Dec 2024) to accelerate genAI productivity
  • Enhanced real-time fraud alerts, reducing compliance workload
Read case study →

AT&T

Telecommunications

As a leading telecom operator, AT&T manages one of the world's largest and most complex networks, spanning millions of cell sites, fiber optics, and 5G infrastructure. The primary challenges included inefficient network planning and optimization, such as determining optimal cell site placement and spectrum acquisition amid exploding data demands from 5G rollout and IoT growth. Traditional methods relied on manual analysis, leading to suboptimal resource allocation and higher capital expenditures. Additionally, reactive network maintenance caused frequent outages, with anomaly detection lagging behind real-time needs. Detecting and fixing issues proactively was critical to minimize downtime, but vast data volumes from network sensors overwhelmed legacy systems. This resulted in increased operational costs, customer dissatisfaction, and delayed 5G deployment. AT&T needed scalable AI to predict failures, automate healing, and forecast demand accurately.

Lösung

AT&T integrated machine learning and predictive analytics through its AT&T Labs, developing models for network design including spectrum refarming and cell site optimization. AI algorithms analyze geospatial data, traffic patterns, and historical performance to recommend ideal tower locations, reducing build costs. For operations, anomaly detection and self-healing systems use predictive models on NFV (Network Function Virtualization) to forecast failures and automate fixes, like rerouting traffic. Causal AI extends beyond correlations for root-cause analysis in churn and network issues. Implementation involved edge-to-edge intelligence, deploying AI across 100,000+ engineers' workflows.

Ergebnisse

  • Billions of dollars saved in network optimization costs
  • 20-30% improvement in network utilization and efficiency
  • Significant reduction in truck rolls and manual interventions
  • Proactive detection of anomalies preventing major outages
  • Optimized cell site placement reducing CapEx by millions
  • Enhanced 5G forecasting accuracy by up to 40%
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Centralise Policy Content into an AI-Ready Knowledge Base

The first tactical step to automate absence and leave queries with Gemini is to consolidate your policies into a structured, searchable knowledge base. Gather all relevant documents: global leave policies, local annexes, works council agreements, public holiday calendars, and HR FAQ pages. Remove duplicates, align terminology, and tag each section by country, employee group, and contract type.

In Google Workspace, store these in a dedicated Drive folder with clear naming conventions and share settings. Then configure Gemini (via extensions or custom integration) to index only this curated folder. This reduces the risk of the model pulling outdated drafts from random folders and ensures that every answer is grounded in an approved source.

Design Robust Prompts and System Instructions for HR Use

To get consistent, compliant responses, define a persistent system prompt for your Gemini HR assistant. This prompt should encode your tone of voice, escalation rules, and how to handle uncertainty. For example, when implementing a chatbot in your intranet or Google Chat, your backend would inject a stable system instruction with every request.

Example system prompt for Gemini:
You are an internal HR leave assistant for ACME GmbH.

Your tasks:
- Answer questions about vacation, sick leave, parental leave, and public holidays.
- Use ONLY the official policy documents and calendars provided to you.
- Always specify when rules differ by country, location, or employee group.
- If you are not certain or the situation seems exceptional, say so clearly and
  suggest contacting HR via the official channel with a short explanation.
- Do NOT make up legal interpretations or commitments.
- Answer in clear, friendly, professional language and keep responses concise.

Iterate on this prompt based on real conversations. Monitor where Gemini overconfidently answers ambiguous questions and adjust instructions to push those into escalation instead of guesswork.

Connect to HRIS or Payroll for Balance and Holiday Data

Employees don’t just want to know the rules; they want to know their own leave balance and applicable holidays. Where technically and legally feasible, integrate Gemini with your HRIS or payroll system via APIs or export files. The assistant can then retrieve, for example, remaining vacation days or upcoming public holidays for the employee’s location.

A common pattern is a thin middleware service: it authenticates the user (e.g., via Google identity), looks up their employee ID, fetches balance and calendar information from the HRIS, and passes those values into Gemini’s context. Gemini then combines static policy text with dynamic data. This keeps sensitive operations in your own infrastructure while still giving the assistant personalised answers.

Example context passed to Gemini:
"employee_country": "DE",
"employee_region": "BW",
"employee_contract_type": "full-time",
"vacation_days_total": 30,
"vacation_days_taken": 18,
"vacation_days_remaining": 12,
"next_public_holidays": ["2025-01-01", "2025-01-06"]

Embed the Assistant Where Employees Already Ask HR

Adoption depends on convenience. Instead of launching yet another portal, put your Gemini leave assistant in the channels employees already use: Google Chat, Gmail side panels, your intranet, or the HR service portal. In Google Workspace, you can expose a Gemini-powered chatbot as a Chat app, or as a custom web component embedded in your intranet.

For example, configure a Google Chat space called “Ask HR – Leave & Absence” where users can DM the bot. Or add a widget on your intranet’s HR page with a clear call-to-action: “Ask about your vacation, sick leave, and holidays.” The fewer context switches needed, the more queries will flow through the assistant instead of email.

Implement Logging, Feedback, and Continuous Improvement

To maintain quality and compliance, instrument your Gemini HR chatbot with logging and feedback loops. Store anonymised conversation transcripts (respecting data protection rules) and mark which responses were rated helpful vs. unhelpful by employees. Provide a simple feedback control after each answer: “Was this answer helpful? Yes / No – Add comment”.

On a regular cadence, HR and the AI team should review low-rated answers, identify patterns (e.g., missing policy edge cases, ambiguous wording, unclear escalation paths), and update both the knowledge base and the system prompt. This turns the assistant into a living system that improves over time instead of degrading as policies change.

Define Concrete KPIs and Run a Pilot in One Region

Before scaling globally, run a 4–8 week pilot with a well-defined target group – for example, employees in one country or business unit. Define concrete KPIs: percentage reduction in manual leave tickets, average response time, AI resolution rate, and user satisfaction (via a short survey). Configure your ticketing tool so that all leave-related emails from the pilot group are redirected to the assistant first, with clear fallback options.

During the pilot, compare baseline metrics (before Gemini) with the new setup. For many organisations, realistic outcomes are a 30–60% reduction in standard leave tickets and a response time drop from days to seconds for simple queries. Use these numbers and qualitative feedback to refine the setup and build the case for broader rollout.

When implemented with these tactical best practices, a Gemini-powered HR assistant for absence and leave can realistically cut manual HR inquiries by double-digit percentages, improve answer consistency across regions, and free several hours per HR FTE per week for more strategic work. The exact impact will vary by organisation, but disciplined piloting, integration, and continuous improvement consistently turn leave queries into one of the most attractive entry points for AI in HR.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini is well-suited to handle most standardised leave queries that follow clear rules. Typical examples include: remaining vacation days, how to request time off, which public holidays apply to a location, how to record sick leave, or where to find forms and approval flows.

More complex, sensitive cases (e.g., long-term illness, special compassionate leave, or exceptional arrangements) should still be routed to human HR. We usually configure Gemini to recognise these patterns and suggest escalation rather than attempting a definitive answer.

A focused Gemini HR leave assistant can often be prototyped in a few weeks, assuming you already have digitised policy documents and access to your HRIS or payroll APIs. A typical timeline:

  • 1–2 weeks: Scope definition, policy consolidation, architecture design
  • 1–3 weeks: Technical integration (knowledge base, optional HRIS connection), prompt design
  • 2–4 weeks: Pilot rollout in one region or business unit, tuning based on feedback

The full duration depends on internal approvals (IT, Security, Works Council) and how complex your policy landscape is. Reruption’s PoC approach is designed to de-risk this phase and get a working prototype in front of users quickly.

To run a Gemini-powered HR support assistant effectively, you typically need:

  • HR process owners who understand your leave policies and edge cases
  • IT/engineering support to manage integrations (HRIS, identity, intranet)
  • Security/Data Protection to validate data flows and access controls
  • A product owner who treats the assistant as an evolving service, not a one-off project

If you lack in-house AI engineering capacity, partners like Reruption can provide the technical backbone and help your HR and IT teams learn how to maintain and evolve the solution over time.

The ROI comes from three areas: reduced manual workload in HR, faster and more consistent answers for employees, and lower risk of policy misinterpretation. In practice, companies often see a 30–60% reduction in standard leave-related tickets and a significant drop in response times for simple questions.

For example, if each HR FTE spends several hours per week on repetitive leave queries, automating a large portion of these can free dozens of hours per month across the team. This time can be reallocated to strategic HR initiatives. Upfront costs are primarily in integration and change management rather than licensing, so the payback period is usually measured in months, not years, once adoption is achieved.

Reruption combines AI engineering with deep experience building real-world assistants and automations in corporate environments. Our AI PoC offering (9,900€) is a structured way to test whether a Gemini-based HR leave assistant works in your specific context: we define the use case, design the architecture, build a working prototype, and measure performance and user impact.

Beyond the PoC, we apply our Co-Preneur approach: we embed with your HR, IT, and Security teams, act with entrepreneurial ownership, and build the assistant as if it were our own product. That includes policy restructuring, integration with your HRIS or Google Workspace, security and compliance design, pilot rollout, and enablement so your teams can operate and evolve the solution themselves.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media