The Challenge: Hidden Exposure to Market Shocks

Finance teams are accountable for understanding how interest rate moves, FX swings and commodity shocks hit earnings and liquidity. In reality, exposures are buried in a maze of ERP data, treasury systems, spreadsheets, hedge contracts and business unit reports. By the time sensitivities are calculated and reconciled, markets have already moved, leaving CFOs and treasurers with a blurry, backward-looking view of risk.

Traditional approaches rely on manual data aggregation and static sensitivity analysis. Analysts export positions from multiple systems, clean them in Excel, stitch on pricing curves and then run a few pre-defined scenarios. This process is slow, brittle and hard to repeat. It typically ignores unstructured signals such as market research, analyst reports, news, and internal emails that often contain early warning signs. As products, geographies and counterparties proliferate, the old tooling simply cannot keep up.

The cost of this gap is real. Hidden concentrations of rate or FX risk can wipe out margins in certain business lines, destabilise cash flow forecasts and trigger covenant issues. Missed early-warning indicators can lead to delayed hedging, suboptimal pricing and unnecessary earnings volatility. Competitors who industrialise their market risk analytics gain an edge: they reprice faster, hedge more precisely and engage banks and investors from a position of data-backed confidence.

The good news: this problem is tough but solvable. Modern AI models like Gemini can combine text, tables and time series to assemble a much more complete picture of exposure and emerging stress. At Reruption, we’ve helped organisations turn scattered data and ad-hoc analysis into robust AI-powered workflows. In the sections below, you’ll see practical guidance on how finance and risk teams can use Gemini to surface hidden exposures, simulate shocks and act before the market forces their hand.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s experience building AI solutions for finance and risk teams, the key opportunity with Gemini for hidden market shock exposure is its ability to fuse structured data (positions, curves, sensitivities) with unstructured content (research, news, internal commentary) in one reasoning layer. Instead of adding yet another point tool, you can use Gemini as an AI risk co-pilot that continuously scans your world for emerging stress, links it to your actual positions, and feeds finance leaders with decision-ready insight.

Think in Terms of an Always-On Risk Radar, Not One-Off Stress Tests

Most organisations treat market shock analysis as a periodic exercise driven by board requests or crises. With Gemini, the mindset should shift to building an always-on radar that constantly ingests market signals, research and transaction data. Strategically, this means defining what “abnormal” looks like for your business: which currencies, tenors, credit spreads, commodities and macro indicators really matter to your earnings model.

Start by agreeing with Treasury, Controlling and FP&A on a concise set of key exposures and indicators. Then use Gemini to monitor those indicators across time series data and narrative sources. The benefit is not just faster analysis; it’s a structural upgrade from episodic stress testing to continuous, AI-augmented risk sensing.

Align Finance, Treasury and Business Units Around a Shared Exposure Model

Hidden exposure often exists because each team owns its own version of reality: Treasury focuses on derivatives and funding, Controlling looks at EBIT sensitivities, and business units track local pricing and volumes. To make Gemini effective, you need strategic alignment on how exposure is defined and measured across the organisation.

Facilitate a joint working session where stakeholders map their current data sources, reports and metrics. Use this to design a common exposure model that Gemini will reason over: which tables represent positions, what each column means, where FX, rate and commodity risk show up. This organisational readiness step reduces friction later and ensures that AI-driven risk insights can be trusted and actioned by all sides.

Use Gemini to Bridge Qualitative Narratives and Quantitative Sensitivities

Market stress rarely appears first in your own ledgers; it shows up in research notes, rating actions, earnings calls and news. Strategically, Gemini’s strength is in turning these qualitative signals into hypotheses about quantitative impact on your portfolio: which segments, geographies, products or counterparties are likely to be hit.

Design workflows where Gemini first builds a scenario narrative from external and internal texts (“What is the story behind this rate move or liquidity squeeze?”) and then links that story back to your sensitivity tables and position data. This reinforces a culture where finance decisions are based on both numbers and contextual understanding of the market environment.

Invest Early in Data Stewardship and Risk Taxonomies

Even the best AI model is constrained by the structure and clarity of the data it sees. Before scaling Gemini, take a strategic view on your risk data foundations: consistent naming of products and counterparties, clean hierarchies for business units, and well-defined tags for rate, FX and commodity exposures.

Nominate data stewards in Finance and Treasury who own these taxonomies and are accountable for their evolution. When Gemini has clear labels and relationships to work with, it becomes much better at spotting non-obvious concentrations and cross-portfolio correlations during market shocks.

Design Governance That Encourages Experimentation but Controls Model Risk

Using Gemini for market risk analysis introduces new questions: who can change prompts, what counts as approved logic, and how do you avoid over-reliance on AI-generated insights. Strategically, governance should enable rapid experimentation while keeping guardrails around high-impact decisions.

Define tiers of usage: exploratory analysis by analysts, standardized AI-assisted reports for management, and tightly governed workflows for limit-setting and hedging decisions. Embed review steps where human risk experts validate AI-generated exposure assessments before they influence capital allocation. This balance keeps speed without sacrificing control.

Using Gemini to uncover hidden exposure to market shocks is less about replacing your risk models and more about connecting the dots between fragmented data, early warning signals and your actual P&L. With the right strategy, Gemini becomes an always-on radar that surfaces concentrations, builds credible scenarios and gives finance leaders time to act. Reruption’s combination of AI engineering depth and hands-on work with complex data environments puts us in a strong position to help you design, prototype and operationalise these workflows—if you see similar challenges in your organisation, we’re happy to explore what a focused, low-risk PoC could look like.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Education to Streaming Media: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Khan Academy

Education

Khan Academy faced the monumental task of providing personalized tutoring at scale to its 100 million+ annual users, many in under-resourced areas. Traditional online courses, while effective, lacked the interactive, one-on-one guidance of human tutors, leading to high dropout rates and uneven mastery. Teachers were overwhelmed with planning, grading, and differentiation for diverse classrooms. In 2023, as AI advanced, educators grappled with hallucinations and over-reliance risks in tools like ChatGPT, which often gave direct answers instead of fostering learning. Khan Academy needed an AI that promoted step-by-step reasoning without cheating, while ensuring equitable access as a nonprofit. Scaling safely across subjects and languages posed technical and ethical hurdles.

Lösung

Khan Academy developed Khanmigo, an AI-powered tutor and teaching assistant built on GPT-4, piloted in March 2023 for teachers and expanded to students. Unlike generic chatbots, Khanmigo uses custom prompts to guide learners Socratically—prompting questions, hints, and feedback without direct answers—across math, science, humanities, and more. The nonprofit approach emphasized safety guardrails, integration with Khan's content library, and iterative improvements via teacher feedback. Partnerships like Microsoft enabled free global access for teachers by 2024, now in 34+ languages. Ongoing updates, such as 2025 math computation enhancements, address accuracy challenges.

Ergebnisse

  • User Growth: 68,000 (2023-24 pilot) to 700,000+ (2024-25 school year)
  • Teacher Adoption: Free for teachers in most countries, millions using Khan Academy tools
  • Languages Supported: 34+ for Khanmigo
  • Engagement: Improved student persistence and mastery in pilots
  • Time Savings: Teachers save hours on lesson planning and prep
  • Scale: Integrated with 429+ free courses in 43 languages
Read case study →

Tesla, Inc.

Automotive

The automotive industry faces a staggering 94% of traffic accidents attributed to human error, including distraction, fatigue, and poor judgment, resulting in over 1.3 million global road deaths annually. In the US alone, NHTSA data shows an average of one crash per 670,000 miles driven, highlighting the urgent need for advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) to enhance safety and reduce fatalities. Tesla encountered specific hurdles in scaling vision-only autonomy, ditching radar and lidar for camera-based systems reliant on AI to mimic human perception. Challenges included variable AI performance in diverse conditions like fog, night, or construction zones, regulatory scrutiny over misleading Level 2 labeling despite Level 4-like demos, and ensuring robust driver monitoring to prevent over-reliance. Past incidents and studies criticized inconsistent computer vision reliability.

Lösung

Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) Supervised leverage end-to-end deep learning neural networks trained on billions of real-world miles, processing camera feeds for perception, prediction, and control without modular rules. Transitioning from HydraNet (multi-task learning for 30+ outputs) to pure end-to-end models, FSD v14 achieves door-to-door driving via video-based imitation learning. Overcoming challenges, Tesla scaled data collection from its fleet of 6M+ vehicles, using Dojo supercomputers for training on petabytes of video. Vision-only approach cuts costs vs. lidar rivals, with recent upgrades like new cameras addressing edge cases. Regulatory pushes target unsupervised FSD by end-2025, with China approval eyed for 2026.

Ergebnisse

  • Autopilot Crash Rate: 1 per 6.36M miles (Q3 2025)
  • Safety Multiple: 9x safer than US average (670K miles/crash)
  • Fleet Data: Billions of miles for training
  • FSD v14: Door-to-door autonomy achieved
  • Q2 2025: 1 crash per 6.69M miles
  • 2024 Q4 Record: 5.94M miles between accidents
Read case study →

Goldman Sachs

Investment Banking

In the fast-paced investment banking sector, Goldman Sachs employees grapple with overwhelming volumes of repetitive tasks. Daily routines like processing hundreds of emails, writing and debugging complex financial code, and poring over lengthy documents for insights consume up to 40% of work time, diverting focus from high-value activities like client advisory and deal-making. Regulatory constraints exacerbate these issues, as sensitive financial data demands ironclad security, limiting off-the-shelf AI use. Traditional tools fail to scale with the need for rapid, accurate analysis amid market volatility, risking delays in response times and competitive edge.

Lösung

Goldman Sachs countered with a proprietary generative AI assistant, fine-tuned on internal datasets in a secure, private environment. This tool summarizes emails by extracting action items and priorities, generates production-ready code for models like risk assessments, and analyzes documents to highlight key trends and anomalies. Built from early 2023 proofs-of-concept, it leverages custom LLMs to ensure compliance and accuracy, enabling natural language interactions without external data risks. The firm prioritized employee augmentation over replacement, training staff for optimal use.

Ergebnisse

  • Rollout Scale: 10,000 employees in 2024
  • Timeline: PoCs 2023; initial rollout 2024; firmwide 2025
  • Productivity Boost: Routine tasks streamlined, est. 25-40% time savings on emails/coding/docs
  • Adoption: Rapid uptake across tech and front-office teams
  • Strategic Impact: Core to 10-year AI playbook for structural gains
Read case study →

Three UK

Telecommunications

Three UK, a leading mobile telecom operator in the UK, faced intense pressure from surging data traffic driven by 5G rollout, video streaming, online gaming, and remote work. With over 10 million customers, peak-hour congestion in urban areas led to dropped calls, buffering during streams, and high latency impacting gaming experiences. Traditional monitoring tools struggled with the volume of big data from network probes, making real-time optimization impossible and risking customer churn. Compounding this, legacy on-premises systems couldn't scale for 5G network slicing and dynamic resource allocation, resulting in inefficient spectrum use and OPEX spikes. Three UK needed a solution to predict and preempt network bottlenecks proactively, ensuring low-latency services for latency-sensitive apps while maintaining QoS across diverse traffic types.

Lösung

Microsoft Azure Operator Insights emerged as the cloud-based AI platform tailored for telecoms, leveraging big data machine learning to ingest petabytes of network telemetry in real-time. It analyzes KPIs like throughput, packet loss, and handover success to detect anomalies and forecast congestion. Three UK integrated it with their core network for automated insights and recommendations. The solution employed ML models for root-cause analysis, traffic prediction, and optimization actions like beamforming adjustments and load balancing. Deployed on Azure's scalable cloud, it enabled seamless migration from legacy tools, reducing dependency on manual interventions and empowering engineers with actionable dashboards.

Ergebnisse

  • 25% reduction in network congestion incidents
  • 20% improvement in average download speeds
  • 15% decrease in end-to-end latency
  • 30% faster anomaly detection
  • 10% OPEX savings on network ops
  • Improved NPS by 12 points
Read case study →

NVIDIA

Manufacturing

In semiconductor manufacturing, chip floorplanning—the task of arranging macros and circuitry on a die—is notoriously complex and NP-hard. Even expert engineers spend months iteratively refining layouts to balance power, performance, and area (PPA), navigating trade-offs like wirelength minimization, density constraints, and routability. Traditional tools struggle with the explosive combinatorial search space, especially for modern chips with millions of cells and hundreds of macros, leading to suboptimal designs and delayed time-to-market. NVIDIA faced this acutely while designing high-performance GPUs, where poor floorplans amplify power consumption and hinder AI accelerator efficiency. Manual processes limited scalability for 2.7 million cell designs with 320 macros, risking bottlenecks in their accelerated computing roadmap. Overcoming human-intensive trial-and-error was critical to sustain leadership in AI chips.

Lösung

NVIDIA deployed deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to model floorplanning as a sequential decision process: an agent places macros one-by-one, learning optimal policies via trial and error. Graph neural networks (GNNs) encode the chip as a graph, capturing spatial relationships and predicting placement impacts. The agent uses a policy network trained on benchmarks like MCNC and GSRC, with rewards penalizing half-perimeter wirelength (HPWL), congestion, and overlap. Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) enables efficient exploration, transferable across designs. This AI-driven approach automates what humans do manually but explores vastly more configurations.

Ergebnisse

  • Design Time: 3 hours for 2.7M cells vs. months manually
  • Chip Scale: 2.7 million cells, 320 macros optimized
  • PPA Improvement: Superior or comparable to human designs
  • Training Efficiency: Under 6 hours total for production layouts
  • Benchmark Success: Outperforms on MCNC/GSRC suites
  • Speedup: 10-30% faster circuits in related RL designs
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Centralise Position and Exposure Data for Gemini Consumption

Start by creating a consolidated dataset that represents your key financial exposures: debt and investment positions, FX-denominated receivables and payables, commodity-linked contracts, and relevant derivatives. The goal is not to build a perfect data warehouse overnight, but to assemble a minimum viable exposure view that Gemini can reason over.

Export data from your ERP, treasury and risk systems into structured tables (CSV, Sheets, or a database with an API). Standardise critical fields such as currency, maturity, counterparty, business unit and instrument type. Document these fields clearly—Gemini will use the column names and descriptions to understand what it’s looking at.

Once the first version is ready, connect Gemini to this dataset (via a secure connector, API, or by providing extracts within your allowed data boundaries). Test with simple questions like “show me total EUR exposure by maturity bucket” to validate that the model correctly interprets your structure before moving to more complex scenarios.

Use Gemini to Build Scenario Narratives from News and Research

Leverage Gemini’s multimodal and text capabilities to transform unstructured information into actionable market shock scenarios. Ingest daily news feeds, broker research, central bank speeches and internal commentary into a workspace that Gemini can access.

Then, define prompts that ask Gemini to synthesise this information into concise scenarios with clear drivers and affected markets. For example:

Prompt example for Gemini:
You are a risk analyst for our finance department.

1) Read the following news, research snippets and macro data.
2) Identify 2-3 plausible market shock scenarios over the next 3-6 months 
   focused on: interest rates, FX and commodity prices.
3) For each scenario, summarise:
   - Core narrative and triggers
   - Affected currencies, curves and commodities
   - Likely impact on liquidity and refinancing conditions
4) Output in a structured table plus a short narrative summary.

Run this daily or weekly and store the resulting scenarios with timestamps. This allows you to link each scenario back to your exposure data in subsequent steps.

Link Scenario Drivers to Portfolio Sensitivities with Structured Prompts

Once you have both exposure tables and scenario narratives, configure Gemini to map one to the other. Provide Gemini with your sensitivity assumptions (e.g. EBIT change per 1% FX move, cash interest expense per 100 bps rate shift, gross margin impact per USD 10 commodity move) as structured inputs or reference tables.

Use prompts that explicitly instruct Gemini how to apply these sensitivities to your portfolio under each scenario. For example:

Prompt example for Gemini:
You are assisting Treasury in market risk analysis.

Inputs:
- Table A: Position and exposure data (by currency, maturity, BU, instrument)
- Table B: Sensitivity factors (e.g. EBIT impact per 1% FX move by BU)
- Scenario X: Description of expected rate, FX and commodity moves.

Tasks:
1) Translate Scenario X into numeric shocks for each relevant currency, curve and commodity.
2) Apply these shocks to Tables A and B.
3) Estimate approximate impact on:
   - Annual EBIT by BU
   - Cash interest expense
   - Liquidity headroom vs. current facilities
4) Highlight the 5 largest negative impacts and any concentration risks.

Validate the outputs with your risk team, refine the sensitivities, and then templatise this process so analysts can reuse it for new scenarios in minutes.

Set Up Automated Alerts for Abnormal Co-Movement and Liquidity Signals

Gemini can monitor time series for unusual patterns that may indicate emerging stress—such as sudden co-movements between normally uncorrelated assets, widening credit spreads, or falling trading volumes. Connect Gemini to your market data feeds (within your compliance framework) and define rules and prompts for “suspicious” behaviour.

For example, create a scheduled job that asks Gemini to scan recent data and generate a short alert when thresholds are breached:

Prompt example for Gemini:
You monitor our market data for early warning signs of stress.

1) Analyse the last 30 days of data for:
   - FX rates of our top 10 currencies
   - Relevant interest rate swap curves
   - Key commodity benchmarks
   - CDS or credit spreads for our main counterparties (if available)
2) Identify:
   - Unusual co-movements vs. historical correlations
   - Sharp moves (> X standard deviations) in 1-3 day windows
   - Significant drops in proxy liquidity indicators (e.g. volume)
3) If any are found, produce a concise alert:
   - What changed
   - Why this might matter for our portfolio (based on our exposure schema)
   - Suggested next checks for the risk team.

Deliver these alerts via email, chat or your risk dashboard, so finance teams can investigate potential issues before they turn into P&L surprises.

Embed Gemini in Monthly and Quarterly Risk & Planning Cycles

To make AI support sustainable, integrate Gemini-driven analyses into existing finance rhythms rather than running them as side experiments. Define a standard Gemini workflow for month-end and quarter-end: scenario refresh, exposure heatmaps, and a concise market risk briefing for CFO, Treasury and FP&A.

For example, include a Gemini-generated section in your monthly Treasury report that covers: top 5 exposures under stress, new concentration risks, and a one-page narrative of relevant market developments. Standardise the prompts, data inputs and output templates so that analysts can repeat the process with minimal manual tweaking.

Over time, measure cycle time (how long it takes to produce these views), the number of scenarios assessed, and how often alerts matched real market events. Use these KPIs to refine both the technical setup and the operating model.

Track Practical KPIs and Calibrate for Realistic Outcomes

To demonstrate value and avoid overpromising, define realistic KPIs for your Gemini implementation. Examples include: reduction in time to produce sensitivity analyses (e.g. from days to hours), increase in number of scenarios assessed per quarter, earlier detection of specific risk concentrations, and improved accuracy of earnings-at-risk estimates compared to prior processes.

Establish a feedback loop where risk and finance teams log cases where Gemini insights triggered earlier or better decisions (e.g. adjusted hedge ratios, revised pricing, or changed funding mix). Use this evidence to calibrate models, prompts and sensitivity assumptions.

Expected outcomes for a well-executed setup are pragmatic: 30–60% faster generation of scenario analyses, 2–3x more scenarios evaluated in planning cycles, and materially earlier visibility on a handful of high-impact exposures each year. These improvements compound into a more resilient balance sheet and fewer surprises when markets move abruptly.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini combines your structured exposure data (positions, maturities, currencies, contracts) with unstructured information (news, research, internal commentary) to build a more complete picture of risk. It can:

  • Identify concentrations in specific currencies, tenors, commodities or counterparties across scattered systems.
  • Map external market narratives (e.g. central bank shifts, geopolitical events) to your internal exposures and sensitivities.
  • Surface unusual co-movements or volatility in time series that may interact with your portfolio in non-obvious ways.

The result is an “always-on” view that helps finance teams see exposures that traditional, spreadsheet-based sensitivity analysis often misses.

You don’t need a large data science team, but you do need a few core capabilities:

  • A finance or treasury lead who understands your current risk reports, exposure definitions and decision processes.
  • A technical owner (data engineer or technically minded analyst) who can provide access to key tables and market data feeds.
  • At least one power user comfortable designing and refining Gemini prompts and evaluating output quality.

Reruption typically works with a small cross-functional squad (Finance/Treasury + IT/Data) and can provide the AI engineering and prompt design expertise, so your internal team can focus on business rules and validation instead of low-level implementation details.

With a focused scope, you can see meaningful results quickly. In our experience, a well-defined proof of concept focused on a subset of exposures (e.g. FX for 3–4 major currencies and a limited set of business units) can be prototyped in a few weeks.

Within this timeframe, you can typically:

  • Consolidate and standardise relevant exposure data.
  • Set up basic scenario generation from news and research.
  • Run initial AI-assisted sensitivity analyses and early-warning alerts.

Industrialising the solution—embedding it into your monthly and quarterly cycles, refining sensitivities, and integrating with dashboards—usually takes additional iterations over the following 2–3 months.

The direct technology cost of Gemini is typically modest compared to the financial impact of unmanaged market shocks. The main investment lies in initial setup: data integration, workflow design and organisational alignment. However, even a small reduction in unexpected FX losses, interest expenses, or commodity-driven margin erosion can quickly exceed the implementation cost.

Typical ROI levers include:

  • Reduced manual effort for analysts (scenario analysis in hours instead of days).
  • More precise and timely hedging decisions, reducing earnings volatility.
  • Earlier detection of concentrations that could trigger covenant or liquidity issues.

We recommend starting with a constrained use case and quantifying benefits in concrete terms—e.g. avoided losses in a specific episode or time saved in recurring risk cycles—before scaling out.

Reruption supports organisations end-to-end, from idea to working solution. Through our AI PoC offering (9,900€), we can rapidly validate whether Gemini can effectively map your exposure data, interpret market signals and generate useful scenarios in your specific context. This includes use-case scoping, feasibility checks, rapid prototyping, performance evaluation and a concrete production plan.

Beyond the PoC, our Co-Preneur approach means we embed with your Finance, Treasury and IT teams like co-founders: challenging assumptions, co-designing workflows, and building the actual automations and tools rather than just slide decks. We focus on AI strategy, engineering, security & compliance, and enablement, so your organisation not only gets a functioning Gemini-based risk radar, but also builds the internal capability to maintain and evolve it over time.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media