The Challenge: Hidden Exposure to Market Shocks

Finance teams are accountable for understanding how interest rate moves, FX swings and commodity shocks hit earnings and liquidity. In reality, exposures are buried in a maze of ERP data, treasury systems, spreadsheets, hedge contracts and business unit reports. By the time sensitivities are calculated and reconciled, markets have already moved, leaving CFOs and treasurers with a blurry, backward-looking view of risk.

Traditional approaches rely on manual data aggregation and static sensitivity analysis. Analysts export positions from multiple systems, clean them in Excel, stitch on pricing curves and then run a few pre-defined scenarios. This process is slow, brittle and hard to repeat. It typically ignores unstructured signals such as market research, analyst reports, news, and internal emails that often contain early warning signs. As products, geographies and counterparties proliferate, the old tooling simply cannot keep up.

The cost of this gap is real. Hidden concentrations of rate or FX risk can wipe out margins in certain business lines, destabilise cash flow forecasts and trigger covenant issues. Missed early-warning indicators can lead to delayed hedging, suboptimal pricing and unnecessary earnings volatility. Competitors who industrialise their market risk analytics gain an edge: they reprice faster, hedge more precisely and engage banks and investors from a position of data-backed confidence.

The good news: this problem is tough but solvable. Modern AI models like Gemini can combine text, tables and time series to assemble a much more complete picture of exposure and emerging stress. At Reruption, we’ve helped organisations turn scattered data and ad-hoc analysis into robust AI-powered workflows. In the sections below, you’ll see practical guidance on how finance and risk teams can use Gemini to surface hidden exposures, simulate shocks and act before the market forces their hand.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s experience building AI solutions for finance and risk teams, the key opportunity with Gemini for hidden market shock exposure is its ability to fuse structured data (positions, curves, sensitivities) with unstructured content (research, news, internal commentary) in one reasoning layer. Instead of adding yet another point tool, you can use Gemini as an AI risk co-pilot that continuously scans your world for emerging stress, links it to your actual positions, and feeds finance leaders with decision-ready insight.

Think in Terms of an Always-On Risk Radar, Not One-Off Stress Tests

Most organisations treat market shock analysis as a periodic exercise driven by board requests or crises. With Gemini, the mindset should shift to building an always-on radar that constantly ingests market signals, research and transaction data. Strategically, this means defining what “abnormal” looks like for your business: which currencies, tenors, credit spreads, commodities and macro indicators really matter to your earnings model.

Start by agreeing with Treasury, Controlling and FP&A on a concise set of key exposures and indicators. Then use Gemini to monitor those indicators across time series data and narrative sources. The benefit is not just faster analysis; it’s a structural upgrade from episodic stress testing to continuous, AI-augmented risk sensing.

Align Finance, Treasury and Business Units Around a Shared Exposure Model

Hidden exposure often exists because each team owns its own version of reality: Treasury focuses on derivatives and funding, Controlling looks at EBIT sensitivities, and business units track local pricing and volumes. To make Gemini effective, you need strategic alignment on how exposure is defined and measured across the organisation.

Facilitate a joint working session where stakeholders map their current data sources, reports and metrics. Use this to design a common exposure model that Gemini will reason over: which tables represent positions, what each column means, where FX, rate and commodity risk show up. This organisational readiness step reduces friction later and ensures that AI-driven risk insights can be trusted and actioned by all sides.

Use Gemini to Bridge Qualitative Narratives and Quantitative Sensitivities

Market stress rarely appears first in your own ledgers; it shows up in research notes, rating actions, earnings calls and news. Strategically, Gemini’s strength is in turning these qualitative signals into hypotheses about quantitative impact on your portfolio: which segments, geographies, products or counterparties are likely to be hit.

Design workflows where Gemini first builds a scenario narrative from external and internal texts (“What is the story behind this rate move or liquidity squeeze?”) and then links that story back to your sensitivity tables and position data. This reinforces a culture where finance decisions are based on both numbers and contextual understanding of the market environment.

Invest Early in Data Stewardship and Risk Taxonomies

Even the best AI model is constrained by the structure and clarity of the data it sees. Before scaling Gemini, take a strategic view on your risk data foundations: consistent naming of products and counterparties, clean hierarchies for business units, and well-defined tags for rate, FX and commodity exposures.

Nominate data stewards in Finance and Treasury who own these taxonomies and are accountable for their evolution. When Gemini has clear labels and relationships to work with, it becomes much better at spotting non-obvious concentrations and cross-portfolio correlations during market shocks.

Design Governance That Encourages Experimentation but Controls Model Risk

Using Gemini for market risk analysis introduces new questions: who can change prompts, what counts as approved logic, and how do you avoid over-reliance on AI-generated insights. Strategically, governance should enable rapid experimentation while keeping guardrails around high-impact decisions.

Define tiers of usage: exploratory analysis by analysts, standardized AI-assisted reports for management, and tightly governed workflows for limit-setting and hedging decisions. Embed review steps where human risk experts validate AI-generated exposure assessments before they influence capital allocation. This balance keeps speed without sacrificing control.

Using Gemini to uncover hidden exposure to market shocks is less about replacing your risk models and more about connecting the dots between fragmented data, early warning signals and your actual P&L. With the right strategy, Gemini becomes an always-on radar that surfaces concentrations, builds credible scenarios and gives finance leaders time to act. Reruption’s combination of AI engineering depth and hands-on work with complex data environments puts us in a strong position to help you design, prototype and operationalise these workflows—if you see similar challenges in your organisation, we’re happy to explore what a focused, low-risk PoC could look like.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Fintech to Transportation: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

PayPal

Fintech

PayPal processes millions of transactions hourly, facing rapidly evolving fraud tactics from cybercriminals using sophisticated methods like account takeovers, synthetic identities, and real-time attacks. Traditional rules-based systems struggle with false positives and fail to adapt quickly, leading to financial losses exceeding billions annually and eroding customer trust if legitimate payments are blocked . The scale amplifies challenges: with 10+ million transactions per hour, detecting anomalies in real-time requires analyzing hundreds of behavioral, device, and contextual signals without disrupting user experience. Evolving threats like AI-generated fraud demand continuous model retraining, while regulatory compliance adds complexity to balancing security and speed .

Lösung

PayPal implemented deep learning models for anomaly and fraud detection, leveraging machine learning to score transactions in milliseconds by processing over 500 signals including user behavior, IP geolocation, device fingerprinting, and transaction velocity. Models use supervised and unsupervised learning for pattern recognition and outlier detection, continuously retrained on fresh data to counter new fraud vectors . Integration with H2O.ai's Driverless AI accelerated model development, enabling automated feature engineering and deployment. This hybrid AI approach combines deep neural networks for complex pattern learning with ensemble methods, reducing manual intervention and improving adaptability . Real-time inference blocks high-risk payments pre-authorization, while low-risk ones proceed seamlessly .

Ergebnisse

  • 10% improvement in fraud detection accuracy on AI hardware
  • $500M fraudulent transactions blocked per quarter (~$2B annually)
  • AUROC score of 0.94 in fraud models (H2O.ai implementation)
  • 50% reduction in manual review queue
  • Processes 10M+ transactions per hour with <0.4ms latency
  • <0.32% fraud rate on $1.5T+ processed volume
Read case study →

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA)

Banking

As Australia's largest bank, CBA faced escalating scam and fraud threats, with customers suffering significant financial losses. Scammers exploited rapid digital payments like PayID, where mismatched payee names led to irreversible transfers. Traditional detection lagged behind sophisticated attacks, resulting in high customer harm and regulatory pressure. Simultaneously, contact centers were overwhelmed, handling millions of inquiries on fraud alerts and transactions. This led to long wait times, increased operational costs, and strained resources. CBA needed proactive, scalable AI to intervene in real-time while reducing reliance on human agents.

Lösung

CBA deployed a hybrid AI stack blending machine learning for anomaly detection and generative AI for personalized warnings. NameCheck verifies payee names against PayID in real-time, alerting users to mismatches. CallerCheck authenticates inbound calls, blocking impersonation scams. Partnering with H2O.ai, CBA implemented GenAI-driven predictive models for scam intelligence. An AI virtual assistant in the CommBank app handles routine queries, generates natural responses, and escalates complex issues. Integration with Apate.ai provides near real-time scam intel, enhancing proactive blocking across channels.

Ergebnisse

  • 70% reduction in scam losses
  • 50% cut in customer fraud losses by 2024
  • 30% drop in fraud cases via proactive warnings
  • 40% reduction in contact center wait times
  • 95%+ accuracy in NameCheck payee matching
Read case study →

Capital One

Banking

Capital One grappled with a high volume of routine customer inquiries flooding their call centers, including account balances, transaction histories, and basic support requests. This led to escalating operational costs, agent burnout, and frustrating wait times for customers seeking instant help. Traditional call centers operated limited hours, unable to meet demands for 24/7 availability in a competitive banking landscape where speed and convenience are paramount. Additionally, the banking sector's specialized financial jargon and regulatory compliance added complexity, making off-the-shelf AI solutions inadequate. Customers expected personalized, secure interactions, but scaling human support was unsustainable amid growing digital banking adoption.

Lösung

Capital One addressed these issues by building Eno, a proprietary conversational AI assistant leveraging in-house NLP customized for banking vocabulary. Launched initially as an SMS chatbot in 2017, Eno expanded to mobile apps, web interfaces, and voice integration with Alexa, enabling multi-channel support via text or speech for tasks like balance checks, spending insights, and proactive alerts. The team overcame jargon challenges by developing domain-specific NLP models trained on Capital One's data, ensuring natural, context-aware conversations. Eno seamlessly escalates complex queries to agents while providing fraud protection through real-time monitoring, all while maintaining high security standards.

Ergebnisse

  • 50% reduction in call center contact volume by 2024
  • 24/7 availability handling millions of interactions annually
  • Over 100 million customer conversations processed
  • Significant operational cost savings in customer service
  • Improved response times to near-instant for routine queries
  • Enhanced customer satisfaction with personalized support
Read case study →

Cruise (GM)

Automotive

Developing a self-driving taxi service in dense urban environments posed immense challenges for Cruise. Complex scenarios like unpredictable pedestrians, erratic cyclists, construction zones, and adverse weather demanded near-perfect perception and decision-making in real-time. Safety was paramount, as any failure could result in accidents, regulatory scrutiny, or public backlash. Early testing revealed gaps in handling edge cases, such as emergency vehicles or occluded objects, requiring robust AI to exceed human driver performance. A pivotal safety incident in October 2023 amplified these issues: a Cruise vehicle struck a pedestrian pushed into its path by a hit-and-run driver, then dragged her while fleeing the scene, leading to suspension of operations nationwide. This exposed vulnerabilities in post-collision behavior, sensor fusion under chaos, and regulatory compliance. Scaling to commercial robotaxi fleets while achieving zero at-fault incidents proved elusive amid $10B+ investments from GM.

Lösung

Cruise addressed these with an integrated AI stack leveraging computer vision for perception and reinforcement learning for planning. Lidar, radar, and 30+ cameras fed into CNNs and transformers for object detection, semantic segmentation, and scene prediction, processing 360° views at high fidelity even in low light or rain. Reinforcement learning optimized trajectory planning and behavioral decisions, trained on millions of simulated miles to handle rare events. End-to-end neural networks refined motion forecasting, while simulation frameworks accelerated iteration without real-world risk. Post-incident, Cruise enhanced safety protocols, resuming supervised testing in 2024 with improved disengagement rates. GM's pivot integrated this tech into Super Cruise evolution for personal vehicles.

Ergebnisse

  • 1,000,000+ miles driven fully autonomously by 2023
  • 5 million driverless miles used for AI model training
  • $10B+ cumulative investment by GM in Cruise (2016-2024)
  • 30,000+ miles per intervention in early unsupervised tests
  • Operations suspended Oct 2023; resumed supervised May 2024
  • Zero commercial robotaxi revenue; pivoted Dec 2024
Read case study →

BP

Energy

BP, a global energy leader in oil, gas, and renewables, grappled with high energy costs during peak periods across its extensive assets. Volatile grid demands and price spikes during high-consumption times strained operations, exacerbating inefficiencies in energy production and consumption. Integrating intermittent renewable sources added forecasting challenges, while traditional management failed to dynamically respond to real-time market signals, leading to substantial financial losses and grid instability risks . Compounding this, BP's diverse portfolio—from offshore platforms to data-heavy exploration—faced data silos and legacy systems ill-equipped for predictive analytics. Peak energy expenses not only eroded margins but hindered the transition to sustainable operations amid rising regulatory pressures for emissions reduction. The company needed a solution to shift loads intelligently and monetize flexibility in energy markets .

Lösung

To tackle these issues, BP acquired Open Energi in 2021, gaining access to its flagship Plato AI platform, which employs machine learning for predictive analytics and real-time optimization. Plato analyzes vast datasets from assets, weather, and grid signals to forecast peaks and automate demand response, shifting non-critical loads to off-peak times while participating in frequency response services . Integrated into BP's operations, the AI enables dynamic containment and flexibility markets, optimizing consumption without disrupting production. Combined with BP's internal AI for exploration and simulation, it provides end-to-end visibility, reducing reliance on fossil fuels during peaks and enhancing renewable integration . This acquisition marked a strategic pivot, blending Open Energi's demand-side expertise with BP's supply-side scale.

Ergebnisse

  • $10 million in annual energy savings
  • 80+ MW of energy assets under flexible management
  • Strongest oil exploration performance in years via AI
  • Material boost in electricity demand optimization
  • Reduced peak grid costs through dynamic response
  • Enhanced asset efficiency across oil, gas, renewables
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Centralise Position and Exposure Data for Gemini Consumption

Start by creating a consolidated dataset that represents your key financial exposures: debt and investment positions, FX-denominated receivables and payables, commodity-linked contracts, and relevant derivatives. The goal is not to build a perfect data warehouse overnight, but to assemble a minimum viable exposure view that Gemini can reason over.

Export data from your ERP, treasury and risk systems into structured tables (CSV, Sheets, or a database with an API). Standardise critical fields such as currency, maturity, counterparty, business unit and instrument type. Document these fields clearly—Gemini will use the column names and descriptions to understand what it’s looking at.

Once the first version is ready, connect Gemini to this dataset (via a secure connector, API, or by providing extracts within your allowed data boundaries). Test with simple questions like “show me total EUR exposure by maturity bucket” to validate that the model correctly interprets your structure before moving to more complex scenarios.

Use Gemini to Build Scenario Narratives from News and Research

Leverage Gemini’s multimodal and text capabilities to transform unstructured information into actionable market shock scenarios. Ingest daily news feeds, broker research, central bank speeches and internal commentary into a workspace that Gemini can access.

Then, define prompts that ask Gemini to synthesise this information into concise scenarios with clear drivers and affected markets. For example:

Prompt example for Gemini:
You are a risk analyst for our finance department.

1) Read the following news, research snippets and macro data.
2) Identify 2-3 plausible market shock scenarios over the next 3-6 months 
   focused on: interest rates, FX and commodity prices.
3) For each scenario, summarise:
   - Core narrative and triggers
   - Affected currencies, curves and commodities
   - Likely impact on liquidity and refinancing conditions
4) Output in a structured table plus a short narrative summary.

Run this daily or weekly and store the resulting scenarios with timestamps. This allows you to link each scenario back to your exposure data in subsequent steps.

Link Scenario Drivers to Portfolio Sensitivities with Structured Prompts

Once you have both exposure tables and scenario narratives, configure Gemini to map one to the other. Provide Gemini with your sensitivity assumptions (e.g. EBIT change per 1% FX move, cash interest expense per 100 bps rate shift, gross margin impact per USD 10 commodity move) as structured inputs or reference tables.

Use prompts that explicitly instruct Gemini how to apply these sensitivities to your portfolio under each scenario. For example:

Prompt example for Gemini:
You are assisting Treasury in market risk analysis.

Inputs:
- Table A: Position and exposure data (by currency, maturity, BU, instrument)
- Table B: Sensitivity factors (e.g. EBIT impact per 1% FX move by BU)
- Scenario X: Description of expected rate, FX and commodity moves.

Tasks:
1) Translate Scenario X into numeric shocks for each relevant currency, curve and commodity.
2) Apply these shocks to Tables A and B.
3) Estimate approximate impact on:
   - Annual EBIT by BU
   - Cash interest expense
   - Liquidity headroom vs. current facilities
4) Highlight the 5 largest negative impacts and any concentration risks.

Validate the outputs with your risk team, refine the sensitivities, and then templatise this process so analysts can reuse it for new scenarios in minutes.

Set Up Automated Alerts for Abnormal Co-Movement and Liquidity Signals

Gemini can monitor time series for unusual patterns that may indicate emerging stress—such as sudden co-movements between normally uncorrelated assets, widening credit spreads, or falling trading volumes. Connect Gemini to your market data feeds (within your compliance framework) and define rules and prompts for “suspicious” behaviour.

For example, create a scheduled job that asks Gemini to scan recent data and generate a short alert when thresholds are breached:

Prompt example for Gemini:
You monitor our market data for early warning signs of stress.

1) Analyse the last 30 days of data for:
   - FX rates of our top 10 currencies
   - Relevant interest rate swap curves
   - Key commodity benchmarks
   - CDS or credit spreads for our main counterparties (if available)
2) Identify:
   - Unusual co-movements vs. historical correlations
   - Sharp moves (> X standard deviations) in 1-3 day windows
   - Significant drops in proxy liquidity indicators (e.g. volume)
3) If any are found, produce a concise alert:
   - What changed
   - Why this might matter for our portfolio (based on our exposure schema)
   - Suggested next checks for the risk team.

Deliver these alerts via email, chat or your risk dashboard, so finance teams can investigate potential issues before they turn into P&L surprises.

Embed Gemini in Monthly and Quarterly Risk & Planning Cycles

To make AI support sustainable, integrate Gemini-driven analyses into existing finance rhythms rather than running them as side experiments. Define a standard Gemini workflow for month-end and quarter-end: scenario refresh, exposure heatmaps, and a concise market risk briefing for CFO, Treasury and FP&A.

For example, include a Gemini-generated section in your monthly Treasury report that covers: top 5 exposures under stress, new concentration risks, and a one-page narrative of relevant market developments. Standardise the prompts, data inputs and output templates so that analysts can repeat the process with minimal manual tweaking.

Over time, measure cycle time (how long it takes to produce these views), the number of scenarios assessed, and how often alerts matched real market events. Use these KPIs to refine both the technical setup and the operating model.

Track Practical KPIs and Calibrate for Realistic Outcomes

To demonstrate value and avoid overpromising, define realistic KPIs for your Gemini implementation. Examples include: reduction in time to produce sensitivity analyses (e.g. from days to hours), increase in number of scenarios assessed per quarter, earlier detection of specific risk concentrations, and improved accuracy of earnings-at-risk estimates compared to prior processes.

Establish a feedback loop where risk and finance teams log cases where Gemini insights triggered earlier or better decisions (e.g. adjusted hedge ratios, revised pricing, or changed funding mix). Use this evidence to calibrate models, prompts and sensitivity assumptions.

Expected outcomes for a well-executed setup are pragmatic: 30–60% faster generation of scenario analyses, 2–3x more scenarios evaluated in planning cycles, and materially earlier visibility on a handful of high-impact exposures each year. These improvements compound into a more resilient balance sheet and fewer surprises when markets move abruptly.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini combines your structured exposure data (positions, maturities, currencies, contracts) with unstructured information (news, research, internal commentary) to build a more complete picture of risk. It can:

  • Identify concentrations in specific currencies, tenors, commodities or counterparties across scattered systems.
  • Map external market narratives (e.g. central bank shifts, geopolitical events) to your internal exposures and sensitivities.
  • Surface unusual co-movements or volatility in time series that may interact with your portfolio in non-obvious ways.

The result is an “always-on” view that helps finance teams see exposures that traditional, spreadsheet-based sensitivity analysis often misses.

You don’t need a large data science team, but you do need a few core capabilities:

  • A finance or treasury lead who understands your current risk reports, exposure definitions and decision processes.
  • A technical owner (data engineer or technically minded analyst) who can provide access to key tables and market data feeds.
  • At least one power user comfortable designing and refining Gemini prompts and evaluating output quality.

Reruption typically works with a small cross-functional squad (Finance/Treasury + IT/Data) and can provide the AI engineering and prompt design expertise, so your internal team can focus on business rules and validation instead of low-level implementation details.

With a focused scope, you can see meaningful results quickly. In our experience, a well-defined proof of concept focused on a subset of exposures (e.g. FX for 3–4 major currencies and a limited set of business units) can be prototyped in a few weeks.

Within this timeframe, you can typically:

  • Consolidate and standardise relevant exposure data.
  • Set up basic scenario generation from news and research.
  • Run initial AI-assisted sensitivity analyses and early-warning alerts.

Industrialising the solution—embedding it into your monthly and quarterly cycles, refining sensitivities, and integrating with dashboards—usually takes additional iterations over the following 2–3 months.

The direct technology cost of Gemini is typically modest compared to the financial impact of unmanaged market shocks. The main investment lies in initial setup: data integration, workflow design and organisational alignment. However, even a small reduction in unexpected FX losses, interest expenses, or commodity-driven margin erosion can quickly exceed the implementation cost.

Typical ROI levers include:

  • Reduced manual effort for analysts (scenario analysis in hours instead of days).
  • More precise and timely hedging decisions, reducing earnings volatility.
  • Earlier detection of concentrations that could trigger covenant or liquidity issues.

We recommend starting with a constrained use case and quantifying benefits in concrete terms—e.g. avoided losses in a specific episode or time saved in recurring risk cycles—before scaling out.

Reruption supports organisations end-to-end, from idea to working solution. Through our AI PoC offering (9,900€), we can rapidly validate whether Gemini can effectively map your exposure data, interpret market signals and generate useful scenarios in your specific context. This includes use-case scoping, feasibility checks, rapid prototyping, performance evaluation and a concrete production plan.

Beyond the PoC, our Co-Preneur approach means we embed with your Finance, Treasury and IT teams like co-founders: challenging assumptions, co-designing workflows, and building the actual automations and tools rather than just slide decks. We focus on AI strategy, engineering, security & compliance, and enablement, so your organisation not only gets a functioning Gemini-based risk radar, but also builds the internal capability to maintain and evolve it over time.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media