The Challenge: Unpredictable Discretionary Spend

Discretionary expenses – team offsites, last-minute software subscriptions, equipment, office supplies – are spread across corporate cards, marketplaces and one-off vendors. They rarely go through a structured procurement process, which makes them hard to track in real time. By the time these costs appear in your monthly report, the budget impact is already locked in and finance is left explaining overruns instead of steering spend.

Traditional approaches rely on static budgets, manual expense reviews and sporadic spreadsheet analysis. Controllers chase receipts, consolidate exports from multiple card providers and try to spot outliers line by line. This manual, backward-looking process cannot keep up with the volume and velocity of modern spending, especially when teams are remote, empowered to buy tools directly and using a mix of corporate and virtual cards.

The business impact is significant. Unpredictable discretionary spend erodes margin through unplanned costs, duplicate tools and unmanaged vendor creep. Forecasts become unreliable when ad-hoc purchases swing monthly numbers by high single-digit percentages. Leaders resort to blunt cost freezes and last-minute budget cuts that hurt employee engagement and slow down strategic initiatives. Meanwhile, opportunities to negotiate better terms, consolidate vendors or prevent policy violations are missed because finance only sees the full picture weeks later.

While this challenge is very real, it is also solvable. With the right use of AI for expense control, finance teams can move from reactive reporting to proactive steering. At Reruption, we’ve helped organisations build AI-driven workflows for complex financial and operational data, and the same approach applies here. In the rest of this article, you’ll see how to use Gemini to make discretionary spend visible, predictable and manageable – without slowing down the business.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s perspective, the key to solving unpredictable discretionary spend is not another static report, but an AI layer that continuously reads your card data, expense submissions and budgets. Gemini for finance teams can connect to your existing tools inside Google Workspace, classify spend in near real time and forecast volatility by department or project. Based on our hands-on experience implementing AI expense analytics and document intelligence, we see Gemini as a practical way to give finance proactive control without adding manual workload.

Frame Discretionary Spend as a Data Problem, Not a Discipline Problem

Many organisations treat uncontrolled discretionary spend primarily as a behavioural issue: teams are seen as undisciplined, managers as too lenient on approvals. This often leads to more policies, tighter approval chains and frustration on both sides. Strategically, it is more effective to first frame the challenge as a data visibility and analysis problem. If finance can’t see spend patterns early and clearly, it cannot guide behaviour constructively.

Gemini becomes powerful when you deliberately design it to fix this visibility gap. Instead of asking “How do we stop people from spending?”, the better question is “What data would we need, in what granularity and latency, to manage this spend intelligently?” That mindset shift helps you define the right connections, labels and alert logic for Gemini, and keeps the conversation with business stakeholders collaborative rather than restrictive.

Start with One or Two High-Variance Spend Categories

Trying to automate AI expense control across all discretionary categories at once is risky. You overcomplicate the initial scope and dilute stakeholder focus. Strategically, pick one or two categories where volatility is painful and the data is accessible – for example, travel & entertainment or software subscriptions. These usually have clear patterns (frequency, vendors, pricing) and strong sponsorship from finance and department heads.

Use Gemini to classify and analyse just these categories first. Demonstrating that you can forecast next month’s T&E spend by team with useful accuracy – and flag policy violations before reimbursement – builds confidence in the AI approach. Once stakeholders experience concrete value, you can expand to other discretionary buckets with a clear playbook and governance model.

Design Cross-Functional Ownership Between Finance and Business Teams

AI-driven discretionary spend management touches budgets, team autonomy and productivity tools. If ownership sits only in finance, you risk resistance from business units who feel controlled but not supported. Strategically, position Gemini as a joint capability: finance owns the models, rules and reporting; business owners co-design categories, thresholds and exception workflows.

This means involving department leaders early when defining what “acceptable volatility” means for their area, what constitutes a risky purchase, and what types of AI alerts are actionable vs. noise. When managers see that Gemini will actually help them run their budgets better – for example, by surfacing unused licenses or duplicate tools – they are more likely to support data-quality efforts and realistic alert thresholds.

Build Risk Mitigation into Gemini from Day One

Introducing AI for financial controls naturally raises questions around false positives, compliance and data privacy. An effective strategy is to treat Gemini initially as a “second pair of eyes” rather than an automatic blocker. Configure it to monitor, classify and recommend, while humans retain final approval for high-impact decisions. This reduces change resistance and gives you time to tune the system.

Define clear guardrails: which data Gemini can access, how long it may retain intermediate results, and which outputs are auditable. Work with IT and compliance to ensure that finance’s use of Gemini fits into the organisation’s broader AI governance. With this foundation, you can gradually move from advisory alerts to automated actions (e.g. holding back reimbursements that clearly violate policy) with confidence.

Invest in Finance Team Readiness, Not Just Tool Setup

Even the best Gemini finance integrations fail if controllers and analysts treat AI as a black box. Strategically, budget time for upskilling: how large language models work, what they are good and bad at, and how to design prompts and checks for financial workflows. This doesn’t mean turning finance into data scientists, but giving them enough understanding to trust – and challenge – the AI.

Encourage finance team members to experiment with Gemini inside Google Sheets, Docs and Chat on non-critical tasks first. Let them see how quickly they can reconcile card statements, regroup expenses or simulate scenarios compared to manual work. A finance team that knows how to “speak AI” will surface new use cases on their own and become an active co-creator of your AI expense control strategy, not just a user of someone else’s tool.

Used thoughtfully, Gemini gives finance leaders a new lever on unpredictable discretionary spend: always-on visibility, early warnings and scenario modelling that sits directly in the tools your teams already use. The organisations we see succeed don’t just plug Gemini into card data; they treat it as a shared capability between finance, IT and business leaders, designed around real decisions and clear guardrails. If you want to explore what that could look like in your context, Reruption can help you scope and prototype a focused Gemini use case for discretionary spend – from data connections to working alerts – so you see concrete results before committing to a larger rollout.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Logistics to Manufacturing: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

DHL

Logistics

DHL, a global logistics giant, faced significant challenges from vehicle breakdowns and suboptimal maintenance schedules. Unpredictable failures in its vast fleet of delivery vehicles led to frequent delivery delays, increased operational costs, and frustrated customers. Traditional reactive maintenance—fixing issues only after they occurred—resulted in excessive downtime, with vehicles sidelined for hours or days, disrupting supply chains worldwide. Inefficiencies were compounded by varying fleet conditions across regions, making scheduled maintenance inefficient and wasteful, often over-maintaining healthy vehicles while under-maintaining others at risk. These issues not only inflated maintenance costs by up to 20% in some segments but also eroded customer trust through unreliable deliveries. With rising e-commerce demands, DHL needed a proactive approach to predict failures before they happened, minimizing disruptions in a highly competitive logistics industry.

Lösung

DHL implemented a predictive maintenance system leveraging IoT sensors installed on vehicles to collect real-time data on engine performance, tire wear, brakes, and more. This data feeds into machine learning models that analyze patterns, predict potential breakdowns, and recommend optimal maintenance timing. The AI solution integrates with DHL's existing fleet management systems, using algorithms like random forests and neural networks for anomaly detection and failure forecasting. Overcoming data silos and integration challenges, DHL partnered with tech providers to deploy edge computing for faster processing. Pilot programs in key hubs expanded globally, shifting from time-based to condition-based maintenance, ensuring resources focus on high-risk assets.

Ergebnisse

  • Vehicle downtime reduced by 15%
  • Maintenance costs lowered by 10%
  • Unplanned breakdowns decreased by 25%
  • On-time delivery rate improved by 12%
  • Fleet availability increased by 20%
  • Overall operational efficiency up 18%
Read case study →

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA)

Banking

As Australia's largest bank, CBA faced escalating scam and fraud threats, with customers suffering significant financial losses. Scammers exploited rapid digital payments like PayID, where mismatched payee names led to irreversible transfers. Traditional detection lagged behind sophisticated attacks, resulting in high customer harm and regulatory pressure. Simultaneously, contact centers were overwhelmed, handling millions of inquiries on fraud alerts and transactions. This led to long wait times, increased operational costs, and strained resources. CBA needed proactive, scalable AI to intervene in real-time while reducing reliance on human agents.

Lösung

CBA deployed a hybrid AI stack blending machine learning for anomaly detection and generative AI for personalized warnings. NameCheck verifies payee names against PayID in real-time, alerting users to mismatches. CallerCheck authenticates inbound calls, blocking impersonation scams. Partnering with H2O.ai, CBA implemented GenAI-driven predictive models for scam intelligence. An AI virtual assistant in the CommBank app handles routine queries, generates natural responses, and escalates complex issues. Integration with Apate.ai provides near real-time scam intel, enhancing proactive blocking across channels.

Ergebnisse

  • 70% reduction in scam losses
  • 50% cut in customer fraud losses by 2024
  • 30% drop in fraud cases via proactive warnings
  • 40% reduction in contact center wait times
  • 95%+ accuracy in NameCheck payee matching
Read case study →

Pfizer

Healthcare

The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented urgent need for new antiviral treatments, as traditional drug discovery timelines span 10-15 years with success rates below 10%. Pfizer faced immense pressure to identify potent, oral inhibitors targeting the SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease (Mpro), a key viral enzyme, while ensuring safety and efficacy in humans. Structure-based drug design (SBDD) required analyzing complex protein structures and generating millions of potential molecules, but conventional computational methods were too slow, consuming vast resources and time. Challenges included limited structural data early in the pandemic, high failure risks in hit identification, and the need to run processes in parallel amid global uncertainty. Pfizer's teams had to overcome data scarcity, integrate disparate datasets, and scale simulations without compromising accuracy, all while traditional wet-lab validation lagged behind.

Lösung

Pfizer deployed AI-driven pipelines leveraging machine learning (ML) for SBDD, using models to predict protein-ligand interactions and generate novel molecules via generative AI. Tools analyzed cryo-EM and X-ray structures of the SARS-CoV-2 protease, enabling virtual screening of billions of compounds and de novo design optimized for binding affinity, pharmacokinetics, and synthesizability. By integrating supercomputing with ML algorithms, Pfizer streamlined hit-to-lead optimization, running parallel simulations that identified PF-07321332 (nirmatrelvir) as the lead candidate. This lightspeed approach combined ML with human expertise, reducing iterative cycles and accelerating from target validation to preclinical nomination.

Ergebnisse

  • Drug candidate nomination: 4 months vs. typical 2-5 years
  • Computational chemistry processes reduced: 80-90%
  • Drug discovery timeline cut: From years to 30 days for key phases
  • Clinical trial success rate boost: Up to 12% (vs. industry ~5-10%)
  • Virtual screening scale: Billions of compounds screened rapidly
  • Paxlovid efficacy: 89% reduction in hospitalization/death
Read case study →

H&M

Apparel Retail

In the fast-paced world of apparel retail, H&M faced intense pressure from rapidly shifting consumer trends and volatile demand. Traditional forecasting methods struggled to keep up, leading to frequent stockouts during peak seasons and massive overstock of unsold items, which contributed to high waste levels and tied up capital. Reports indicate H&M's inventory inefficiencies cost millions annually, with overproduction exacerbating environmental concerns in an industry notorious for excess. Compounding this, global supply chain disruptions and competition from agile rivals like Zara amplified the need for precise trend forecasting. H&M's legacy systems relied on historical sales data alone, missing real-time signals from social media and search trends, resulting in misallocated inventory across 5,000+ stores worldwide and suboptimal sell-through rates.

Lösung

H&M deployed AI-driven predictive analytics to transform its approach, integrating machine learning models that analyze vast datasets from social media, fashion blogs, search engines, and internal sales. These models predict emerging trends weeks in advance and optimize inventory allocation dynamically. The solution involved partnering with data platforms to scrape and process unstructured data, feeding it into custom ML algorithms for demand forecasting. This enabled automated restocking decisions, reducing human bias and accelerating response times from months to days.

Ergebnisse

  • 30% increase in profits from optimized inventory
  • 25% reduction in waste and overstock
  • 20% improvement in forecasting accuracy
  • 15-20% higher sell-through rates
  • 14% reduction in stockouts
Read case study →

AstraZeneca

Healthcare

In the highly regulated pharmaceutical industry, AstraZeneca faced immense pressure to accelerate drug discovery and clinical trials, which traditionally take 10-15 years and cost billions, with low success rates of under 10%. Data silos, stringent compliance requirements (e.g., FDA regulations), and manual knowledge work hindered efficiency across R&D and business units. Researchers struggled with analyzing vast datasets from 3D imaging, literature reviews, and protocol drafting, leading to delays in bringing therapies to patients. Scaling AI was complicated by data privacy concerns, integration into legacy systems, and ensuring AI outputs were reliable in a high-stakes environment. Without rapid adoption, AstraZeneca risked falling behind competitors leveraging AI for faster innovation toward 2030 ambitions of novel medicines.

Lösung

AstraZeneca launched an enterprise-wide generative AI strategy, deploying ChatGPT Enterprise customized for pharma workflows. This included AI assistants for 3D molecular imaging analysis, automated clinical trial protocol drafting, and knowledge synthesis from scientific literature. They partnered with OpenAI for secure, scalable LLMs and invested in training: ~12,000 employees across R&D and functions completed GenAI programs by mid-2025. Infrastructure upgrades, like AMD Instinct MI300X GPUs, optimized model training. Governance frameworks ensured compliance, with human-in-loop validation for critical tasks. Rollout phased from pilots in 2023-2024 to full scaling in 2025, focusing on R&D acceleration via GenAI for molecule design and real-world evidence analysis.

Ergebnisse

  • ~12,000 employees trained on generative AI by mid-2025
  • 85-93% of staff reported productivity gains
  • 80% of medical writers found AI protocol drafts useful
  • Significant reduction in life sciences model training time via MI300X GPUs
  • High AI maturity ranking per IMD Index (top global)
  • GenAI enabling faster trial design and dose selection
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Connect Gemini to Your Card and Expense Data via Google Sheets

The fastest way to get value from Gemini for discretionary spend control is to route your corporate card and expense data into Google Sheets and let Gemini work on top. Most card providers and expense tools (e.g. CSV exports or APIs) can feed a daily or weekly dump of transactions with fields such as date, vendor, amount, card holder, department and free-text description.

Set up a central “Discretionary Spend” Google Sheet that aggregates these feeds into a single table. Use a simple ETL process (Apps Script, a no-code connector or your data team) to normalise column names and formats. Once this is in place, finance analysts can open the sheet and use Gemini to auto-classify and analyse transactions without waiting for IT to build a full data warehouse model.

Example Gemini prompt in Google Sheets (cell note or side panel):

You are an AI finance assistant.
Given the following transaction columns:
- Date
- Amount (EUR)
- Vendor
- Description
- Card holder name
- Department

1) Assign a spend category from this list:
   - Travel & Entertainment
   - Software & SaaS
   - Office & Equipment
   - Training & Events
   - Marketing & Ads
   - Other Discretionary

2) Flag if the transaction is "Potential Policy Violation" based on:
   - Vendor looks personal (e.g. supermarkets, luxury brands)
   - Description suggests non-business purpose

Return a table with two new columns: Category, Policy_Flag.

Expected outcome: within hours, you have a structured, AI-enriched view of discretionary spend that can be filtered and pivoted by category, department and risk flag.

Build an AI-Driven Spend Classification Layer

Manual categorisation is one of the main reasons discretionary spend remains opaque. Use Gemini to maintain a consistent AI expense categorisation layer across teams and cards. Start by defining a taxonomy of categories and subcategories that match your chart of accounts and management reporting (e.g. T&E > Flights, Hotels, Meals; Software > Core Tools, Niche Tools, Trials).

Feed Gemini a sample of historical, already-categorised transactions to learn your specific patterns. Then apply Gemini to new data to predict categories and flag low-confidence cases for human review. Over time, you can refine prompts and training examples to reduce rework.

Example refinement prompt for Gemini (Docs or Sheets):

You are helping maintain a finance spend taxonomy.
Here is our current mapping of Vendor to Category:
{{paste a table with Vendor, Category}}

Here is a new list of transactions with Vendor and Description.
1) Suggest the most likely Category using the existing mapping first.
2) Only propose a new Category if it clearly does not fit any existing one.
3) For each new Category you propose, explain the rationale in one sentence.

Expected outcome: 80–90% of new discretionary transactions classified automatically, with clear rationales for edge cases and minimal manual corrections.

Create Proactive Gemini Alerts in Google Chat or Email

Once your classification layer is stable, turn Gemini insights into proactive alerts. Instead of discovering overruns in a monthly close, you can receive weekly notifications when a team’s discretionary spend trend deviates from normal. Combine Gemini’s pattern recognition with simple business rules to avoid alert fatigue.

Use Apps Script or a workflow tool to run a scheduled process: aggregate the last 30 days of discretionary spend by department and category, let Gemini analyse trends versus the previous period, and post a concise summary into a dedicated Google Chat channel or email distribution list.

Example summary prompt for Gemini (scheduled process):

You are a virtual spend controller.
Given a table of discretionary spend by Department, Category and Week
for the last 12 weeks, do the following:

1) Identify departments where spend in the last 4 weeks is >25% higher
   than the prior 4-week average in any Category.
2) For each such department, write a short summary:
   - Which category increased
   - Approximate extra spend in EUR
   - Likely drivers based on vendor names and descriptions
3) Suggest 2–3 specific follow-up questions for the department lead.

Expected outcome: department heads and finance get a short, actionable digest of anomalies instead of raw transaction dumps, enabling earlier and more targeted conversations.

Use Gemini to Model Discretionary Spend Scenarios by Department or Project

Forecasting discretionary spend is notoriously hard because it depends on plans, culture and external triggers. Gemini can help by combining historical patterns with qualitative input from budget owners. Export the last 12–24 months of discretionary spend by department or project into a Google Sheet, and add columns for planned initiatives, headcount changes or upcoming events.

Ask Gemini to propose scenarios: “business as usual”, “cost-conscious”, “growth push”. It can estimate how much each scenario would change discretionary spend per category, based on comparable historical periods (e.g. previous product launches, hiring waves, office moves).

Example scenario modelling prompt (Docs):

You are supporting finance with scenario modelling for discretionary spend.

Input:
- 24 months of historical monthly spend by Department and Category
- Notes on planned initiatives for the next 12 months

Tasks:
1) Build three scenarios for the next 12 months:
   - Baseline
   - 10% cost reduction target on discretionary spend
   - 15% growth in activity (more events, marketing, tools)
2) For each scenario, estimate monthly spend per Department and Category.
3) Explain the main assumptions behind each scenario in bullet points.
4) Highlight 3–5 levers per scenario where managers can adjust behaviour
   without blocking critical work (e.g. vendor consolidation, travel rules).

Expected outcome: finance gains a structured, discussable view of discretionary spend futures that can be refined with stakeholders rather than guessed in isolation.

Embed Spend Guidelines and Justification Templates into Gemini Workflows

AI-based control is most effective when paired with clear guidance for employees. Use Gemini to surface spend guidelines at the moment of purchase or reimbursement. For example, when an employee fills a simple Google Form to request a new SaaS tool or large discretionary purchase, route the request to Gemini first.

Gemini can summarise the request, check it against your policies (stored in a reference document), and propose a justification template that the requester completes. It can also suggest alternatives, such as existing tools that might cover the same need. Approvers receive a structured summary instead of a vague free-text description.

Example approval support prompt (Forms & Docs backend):

You are assisting with discretionary spend approvals.

Given:
- Purchase description
- Estimated monthly or one-off cost
- Department and project
- Existing tools list (name, purpose, owner)
- Company policy document (summary provided)

Produce for the approver:
1) A concise one-paragraph summary of the request.
2) A list of potential overlaps with existing tools or vendors.
3) A short justification template the requester should fill in:
   - Business outcome
   - Alternatives considered
   - Expected duration of need
4) A risk rating: Low / Medium / High, with one-sentence explanation.

Expected outcome: higher-quality approval decisions, less back-and-forth, and a growing dataset of justifications that can later be analysed to refine policies and identify consolidation opportunities.

Track KPIs and Continuously Tune Prompts and Rules

To make Gemini for expense control durable, treat it as a living system with clear KPIs. Define a small set of metrics: percentage of transactions auto-categorised, number of alerts per month, share of alerts leading to concrete action, variance between forecasted and actual discretionary spend, and time saved in monthly close.

Review these KPIs quarterly with finance and key business stakeholders. Where auto-categorisation accuracy is low, adjust prompts or add training examples. Where alerts are ignored, refine thresholds or summary formats. Over time, you should see: 50–70% fewer manual categorisation hours, earlier detection of overspend by 2–4 weeks, and a measurable reduction in discretionary cost growth compared to baseline.

Expected outcomes when implementing these best practices realistically include: a 30–50% improvement in visibility of discretionary spend within the first quarter, 1–3 percentage points reduction in discretionary spend as a share of revenue through better decisions (not blunt cuts), and a meaningful reduction in last-minute cost-cutting measures as forecasts become more reliable.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini helps by turning scattered card and expense data into structured, actionable insight. It can auto-classify transactions by category and department, flag potential policy violations and detect spending patterns that deviate from normal. Finance teams can then receive weekly or even daily summaries of anomalies, rising categories and risky vendors instead of mining raw data.

Combined with scenario modelling, Gemini can also forecast discretionary spend volatility by team or project, so you see upcoming pressure on budgets before month-end. This shifts finance from explaining the past to steering spend in real time.

You do not need a full data science team to start. At minimum, you need:

  • A finance owner who understands your discretionary spend categories, policies and reporting needs.
  • Basic Google Workspace skills (Sheets, Docs, Chat) in the finance team to interact with Gemini and interpret its output.
  • Light IT or data engineering support to automate data feeds from card providers and expense tools into Google Sheets or a central data source.

Reruption typically helps set up the first end-to-end workflow (data connection, prompts, alerts), while your finance team focuses on validating categories, thresholds and the usefulness of insights. Over time, controllers and analysts can maintain and evolve prompts themselves with limited technical support.

With a focused scope, you can see tangible results within 4–6 weeks. In the first 1–2 weeks, we usually define categories, connect initial data feeds and build a basic Gemini classification prompt. Weeks 3–4 are used to validate the quality of auto-categorisation, refine prompts and design simple alerts or dashboards for one or two high-variance spend categories.

By the end of this period, finance should already have a much clearer view of where discretionary money is going and which departments drive volatility. More advanced capabilities – such as scenario modelling or embedded approval support – can be layered on in subsequent iterations without disrupting the initial solution.

ROI typically comes from three areas: time saved, reduced waste and better forecasting. Time savings arise from automated categorisation and faster month-end analysis; many teams see 30–70% less manual work on these tasks. Reduced waste shows up as fewer duplicate tools, eliminated unused subscriptions and better adherence to policies – often reducing discretionary spend growth by 5–15% versus trend.

Improved forecasting means fewer last-minute cost freezes and more targeted interventions. To measure ROI, track metrics such as manual hours spent on categorisation and reporting, number and value of avoided or corrected spend issues flagged by Gemini, and variance between forecasted and actual discretionary spend before and after implementation.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur alongside your finance and IT teams. With our AI PoC offering (9.900€), we can take a specific use case – for example, controlling software and travel spend – and deliver a working prototype in weeks. That includes defining the data scope, selecting the right Gemini workflows, connecting your card and expense systems, crafting effective prompts and evaluating performance.

We bring the same fast engineering and execution mindset we apply in complex AI projects (from document analysis to operational tooling) directly into your P&L, not just into a slide deck. After the PoC, we provide an implementation roadmap and, if you choose, hands-on support to harden the solution, expand it to more categories and embed it into your regular finance processes.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media