The Challenge: No Unified Customer View

Most customer service teams sit on a goldmine of information spread across CRM, ticketing systems, email inboxes, live chat, voice logs and feedback tools. The problem: none of it comes together in front of the agent. Every new interaction feels like starting from zero because there is no single, up‑to‑date customer view that combines history, preferences, issues and promises.

Traditional approaches try to solve this with manual notes, complex CRM customizations or rigid data warehouse projects. In practice, agents don’t have time to maintain perfect records, integrations break whenever tools change, and BI dashboards are built for managers, not for real-time service conversations. As channels multiply and volumes grow, these legacy approaches simply cannot keep up with the speed and complexity of modern customer service.

The business impact is significant: agents ask repeat questions, miss context from earlier channels, and give generic answers instead of tailored recommendations. Customers feel unknown and undervalued, which hurts CSAT, NPS and first contact resolution. At scale, this leads to longer handling times, higher staffing needs and lost upsell and cross-sell opportunities because you cannot confidently recommend the next best action for each person.

The good news: this problem is real but absolutely solvable. With modern AI applied to unified customer profiles and conversation histories, you can finally surface the right context at the right moment for every interaction. At Reruption, we have hands-on experience building AI assistants and chatbots that work with fragmented data, and we’ve seen how quickly service quality can improve once the foundations are right. In the rest of this page, you’ll find practical guidance on how to use Gemini in your contact center stack to move from fragmented records to truly personalized customer interactions.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI-powered assistants and customer service chatbots, we’ve seen that the real unlock is not just deploying another tool, but teaching AI to reason over your existing, messy data. Gemini, tightly integrated with Google Cloud and your contact center stack, can sit on top of CRM, ticketing, email and chat logs to generate a usable, unified view in real time—without waiting for a perfect data warehouse project. Our perspective: treat Gemini as a reasoning layer for personalized customer interactions, not just as another bot.

Define What “Unified Customer View” Actually Means for Your Service

Before connecting Gemini to every data source, get crystal clear on what your agents and customers actually need to see in a unified profile. For most service teams this means a concise picture: identity, recent interactions across channels, open and past issues, key preferences, and any promises or SLAs. Without this definition, you risk surfacing noise instead of useful context and your AI-powered personalization will feel random.

Map a few critical customer journeys—complaints, renewals, upgrades—and identify which pieces of data would have changed the outcome if the agent had known them. Use that as the core of your unified view. Gemini is flexible enough to reason over large amounts of data, but humans are not; the strategy is to have Gemini absorb the complexity and present only what matters for the current interaction.

Start with Agent Assist, Not Full Automation

When there is no unified customer view yet, jumping straight to fully automated AI-driven conversations creates risk. The smarter sequence is to start with Gemini as an agent co-pilot: it pulls together context from CRM, tickets and communications, drafts personalized responses and suggests next-best actions, while a human still owns the final decision.

This approach lets you validate personalization logic, spot data quality gaps and build trust internally. Agents quickly see where the AI is helpful and where the data is incomplete. Over time, as patterns stabilize, you can selectively automate low-risk scenarios (e.g. status requests, simple account questions) with confidence that Gemini is working with reliable, unified profiles.

Design Governance Around Data Access and Personalization Boundaries

A unified view powered by AI in customer service raises immediate questions: What is Gemini allowed to see? What can it propose? How do we control tone and compliance? Strategically, you need a clear governance model before scaling. This includes access rules (which data sources are in scope), retention policies for conversation logs, and explicit red lines for personalization (e.g. no use of sensitive attributes).

Involve legal, compliance and data protection early, but keep the discussion anchored in specific workflows, not abstract fears. Show them example Gemini outputs using synthetic or anonymized data. This collaborative approach reduces friction and ensures your AI-powered customer personalization respects both regulation and brand values.

Prepare Your Teams for AI-Augmented Service, Not Replacement

Personalization with Gemini will change how agents work: less searching, more decision-making. If your service team expects yet another tool that slows them down, adoption will suffer. If they understand Gemini as a way to eliminate repetitive context hunting and support better conversations, they will pull it into their workflows.

Set the right narrative early: you are building an AI assistant for customer service agents, not a replacement. Include agents in pilot design, ask them which context they always wish they had, and incorporate their feedback into prompt and workflow design. This not only improves the system but also builds the internal champions you need for broader roll-out.

Think in Use Cases and KPIs, Not in Technology Features

It’s easy to get lost in the capabilities of large models. Strategically, you should anchor your Gemini initiative in a small set of measurable use cases: for example, “reduce repeated questions by 30%”, “increase first contact resolution for high-value customers by 10%”, or “cut average handle time on complex cases by 15% through better context.” These targets align stakeholders and tell you whether your AI in the contact center is creating real value.

Prioritize use cases where fragmented data clearly hurts outcomes today: multi-channel complaints, recurring technical issues, or renewal risk. Then design how Gemini will consume data and assist agents in those flows. This outcome-first mindset aligns perfectly with Reruption’s co-preneur approach: we focus on business metrics in your P&L, not just on deploying another model.

Using Gemini to fix the lack of a unified customer view is less about building another dashboard and more about giving agents a real-time reasoning partner that understands the full customer history. When done well, it turns fragmented CRM, ticketing and communication data into concrete, personalized actions at every touchpoint. Reruption has the practical experience to move from concept to working Gemini-powered prototypes quickly, and to align them with your service KPIs; if you want to explore how this could look in your environment, we’re happy to co-design a focused, low-risk experiment with your team.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Banking to Banking: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Morgan Stanley

Banking

Financial advisors at Morgan Stanley struggled with rapid access to the firm's extensive proprietary research database, comprising over 350,000 documents spanning decades of institutional knowledge. Manual searches through this vast repository were time-intensive, often taking 30 minutes or more per query, hindering advisors' ability to deliver timely, personalized advice during client interactions . This bottleneck limited scalability in wealth management, where high-net-worth clients demand immediate, data-driven insights amid volatile markets. Additionally, the sheer volume of unstructured data—40 million words of research reports—made it challenging to synthesize relevant information quickly, risking suboptimal recommendations and reduced client satisfaction. Advisors needed a solution to democratize access to this 'goldmine' of intelligence without extensive training or technical expertise .

Lösung

Morgan Stanley partnered with OpenAI to develop AI @ Morgan Stanley Debrief, a GPT-4-powered generative AI chatbot tailored for wealth management advisors. The tool uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to securely query the firm's proprietary research database, providing instant, context-aware responses grounded in verified sources . Implemented as a conversational assistant, Debrief allows advisors to ask natural-language questions like 'What are the risks of investing in AI stocks?' and receive synthesized answers with citations, eliminating manual digging. Rigorous AI evaluations and human oversight ensure accuracy, with custom fine-tuning to align with Morgan Stanley's institutional knowledge . This approach overcame data silos and enabled seamless integration into advisors' workflows.

Ergebnisse

  • 98% adoption rate among wealth management advisors
  • Access for nearly 50% of Morgan Stanley's total employees
  • Queries answered in seconds vs. 30+ minutes manually
  • Over 350,000 proprietary research documents indexed
  • 60% employee access at peers like JPMorgan for comparison
  • Significant productivity gains reported by CAO
Read case study →

Netflix

Streaming Media

With over 17,000 titles and growing, Netflix faced the classic cold start problem and data sparsity in recommendations, where new users or obscure content lacked sufficient interaction data, leading to poor personalization and higher churn rates . Viewers often struggled to discover engaging content among thousands of options, resulting in prolonged browsing times and disengagement—estimated at up to 75% of session time wasted on searching rather than watching . This risked subscriber loss in a competitive streaming market, where retaining users costs far less than acquiring new ones. Scalability was another hurdle: handling 200M+ subscribers generating billions of daily interactions required processing petabytes of data in real-time, while evolving viewer tastes demanded adaptive models beyond traditional collaborative filtering limitations like the popularity bias favoring mainstream hits . Early systems post-Netflix Prize (2006-2009) improved accuracy but struggled with contextual factors like device, time, and mood .

Lösung

Netflix built a hybrid recommendation engine combining collaborative filtering (CF)—starting with FunkSVD and Probabilistic Matrix Factorization from the Netflix Prize—and advanced deep learning models for embeddings and predictions . They consolidated multiple use-case models into a single multi-task neural network, improving performance and maintainability while supporting search, home page, and row recommendations . Key innovations include contextual bandits for exploration-exploitation, A/B testing on thumbnails and metadata, and content-based features from computer vision/audio analysis to mitigate cold starts . Real-time inference on Kubernetes clusters processes 100s of millions of predictions per user session, personalized by viewing history, ratings, pauses, and even search queries . This evolved from 2009 Prize winners to transformer-based architectures by 2023 .

Ergebnisse

  • 80% of viewer hours from recommendations
  • $1B+ annual savings in subscriber retention
  • 75% reduction in content browsing time
  • 10% RMSE improvement from Netflix Prize CF techniques
  • 93% of views from personalized rows
  • Handles billions of daily interactions for 270M subscribers
Read case study →

bunq

Banking

As bunq experienced rapid growth as the second-largest neobank in Europe, scaling customer support became a critical challenge. With millions of users demanding personalized banking information on accounts, spending patterns, and financial advice on demand, the company faced pressure to deliver instant responses without proportionally expanding its human support teams, which would increase costs and slow operations. Traditional search functions in the app were insufficient for complex, contextual queries, leading to inefficiencies and user frustration. Additionally, ensuring data privacy and accuracy in a highly regulated fintech environment posed risks. bunq needed a solution that could handle nuanced conversations while complying with EU banking regulations, avoiding hallucinations common in early GenAI models, and integrating seamlessly without disrupting app performance. The goal was to offload routine inquiries, allowing human agents to focus on high-value issues.

Lösung

bunq addressed these challenges by developing Finn, a proprietary GenAI platform integrated directly into its mobile app, replacing the traditional search function with a conversational AI chatbot. After hiring over a dozen data specialists in the prior year, the team built Finn to query user-specific financial data securely, answer questions on balances, transactions, budgets, and even provide general advice while remembering conversation context across sessions. Launched as Europe's first AI-powered bank assistant in December 2023 following a beta, Finn evolved rapidly. By May 2024, it became fully conversational, enabling natural back-and-forth interactions. This retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) approach grounded responses in real-time user data, minimizing errors and enhancing personalization.

Ergebnisse

  • 100,000+ questions answered within months post-beta (end-2023)
  • 40% of user queries fully resolved autonomously by mid-2024
  • 35% of queries assisted, totaling 75% immediate support coverage
  • Hired 12+ data specialists pre-launch for data infrastructure
  • Second-largest neobank in Europe by user base (1M+ users)
Read case study →

BMW (Spartanburg Plant)

Automotive Manufacturing

The BMW Spartanburg Plant, the company's largest globally producing X-series SUVs, faced intense pressure to optimize assembly processes amid rising demand for SUVs and supply chain disruptions. Traditional manufacturing relied heavily on human workers for repetitive tasks like part transport and insertion, leading to worker fatigue, error rates up to 5-10% in precision tasks, and inefficient resource allocation. With over 11,500 employees handling high-volume production, scheduling shifts and matching workers to tasks manually caused delays and cycle time variability of 15-20%, hindering output scalability. Compounding issues included adapting to Industry 4.0 standards, where rigid robotic arms struggled with flexible tasks in dynamic environments. Labor shortages post-pandemic exacerbated this, with turnover rates climbing, and the need to redeploy skilled workers to value-added roles while minimizing downtime. Machine vision limitations in older systems failed to detect subtle defects, resulting in quality escapes and rework costs estimated at millions annually.

Lösung

BMW partnered with Figure AI to deploy Figure 02 humanoid robots integrated with machine vision for real-time object detection and ML scheduling algorithms for dynamic task allocation. These robots use advanced AI to perceive environments via cameras and sensors, enabling autonomous navigation and manipulation in human-robot collaborative settings. ML models predict production bottlenecks, optimize robot-worker scheduling, and self-monitor performance, reducing human oversight. Implementation involved pilot testing in 2024, where robots handled repetitive tasks like part picking and insertion, coordinated via a central AI orchestration platform. This allowed seamless integration into existing lines, with digital twins simulating scenarios for safe rollout. Challenges like initial collision risks were overcome through reinforcement learning fine-tuning, achieving human-like dexterity.

Ergebnisse

  • 400% increase in robot speed post-trials
  • 7x higher task success rate
  • Reduced cycle times by 20-30%
  • Redeployed 10-15% of workers to skilled tasks
  • $1M+ annual cost savings from efficiency gains
  • Error rates dropped below 1%
Read case study →

AstraZeneca

Healthcare

In the highly regulated pharmaceutical industry, AstraZeneca faced immense pressure to accelerate drug discovery and clinical trials, which traditionally take 10-15 years and cost billions, with low success rates of under 10%. Data silos, stringent compliance requirements (e.g., FDA regulations), and manual knowledge work hindered efficiency across R&D and business units. Researchers struggled with analyzing vast datasets from 3D imaging, literature reviews, and protocol drafting, leading to delays in bringing therapies to patients. Scaling AI was complicated by data privacy concerns, integration into legacy systems, and ensuring AI outputs were reliable in a high-stakes environment. Without rapid adoption, AstraZeneca risked falling behind competitors leveraging AI for faster innovation toward 2030 ambitions of novel medicines.

Lösung

AstraZeneca launched an enterprise-wide generative AI strategy, deploying ChatGPT Enterprise customized for pharma workflows. This included AI assistants for 3D molecular imaging analysis, automated clinical trial protocol drafting, and knowledge synthesis from scientific literature. They partnered with OpenAI for secure, scalable LLMs and invested in training: ~12,000 employees across R&D and functions completed GenAI programs by mid-2025. Infrastructure upgrades, like AMD Instinct MI300X GPUs, optimized model training. Governance frameworks ensured compliance, with human-in-loop validation for critical tasks. Rollout phased from pilots in 2023-2024 to full scaling in 2025, focusing on R&D acceleration via GenAI for molecule design and real-world evidence analysis.

Ergebnisse

  • ~12,000 employees trained on generative AI by mid-2025
  • 85-93% of staff reported productivity gains
  • 80% of medical writers found AI protocol drafts useful
  • Significant reduction in life sciences model training time via MI300X GPUs
  • High AI maturity ranking per IMD Index (top global)
  • GenAI enabling faster trial design and dose selection
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Connect Gemini to a Consolidated, Privacy-Safe Data Layer

Instead of wiring Gemini directly into every system, create a consolidated data layer in Google Cloud that exposes the key elements of your customer 360 view: identifiers, interaction history, tickets, orders, preferences and key events. This can be a BigQuery view or a dedicated API that merges records across CRM, ticketing, email and chat.

Gemini then queries or is provided with this curated snapshot for each interaction. This keeps prompts small and fast, simplifies access control, and allows you to evolve source systems without breaking your AI layer. Apply pseudonymization or tokenization where possible so that AI for customer service personalization operates on the minimum personal data needed.

Use Structured Prompts to Turn Raw History into Actionable Context

A common failure mode is to dump entire ticket histories into Gemini and hope for the best. Instead, use structured prompts that tell Gemini exactly how to interpret the unified view and what to output for agents. This is where you turn raw data into a concise briefing plus a personalized suggestion.

For example, when an agent opens a case, your middleware can assemble a payload (recent tickets, orders, channels, sentiment) and call Gemini with a prompt like:

System: You are an AI assistant helping customer service agents.
You receive a unified customer profile and recent interaction history.

Your tasks:
1) Summarize the customer's situation in <= 5 bullet points.
2) Highlight any promises, SLAs, or open issues.
3) Propose 2-3 personalized next-best actions for the agent.
4) Draft a response in our brand tone: calm, clear, and proactive.

User:
Customer profile and history (JSON):
{{customer_context_json}}

Expected outcome: agents see a clear context summary and a tailored reply draft, instead of scrolling through multiple tools.

Implement Real-Time Agent Assist Widgets in Your Existing Tools

To make Gemini-powered personalization usable, surface it where agents already work—inside your CRM, helpdesk or contact center UI. Build a small sidebar or widget that, on ticket open or call connect, automatically calls Gemini with the unified context and displays:

  • a short customer summary
  • relevant past issues and resolutions
  • risk signals (churn risk, repeated complaints)
  • a suggested, personalized reply

Technically, this is often a lightweight integration: your frontend triggers a backend function that collects data from your consolidated layer, calls Gemini’s API with a structured prompt, and returns the result. Start with a read-only assistant; once agents trust it, you can add actions such as “create follow-up task” or “suggest tailored offer.”

Use Gemini to Normalize and Link Identities Across Channels

One root cause of “no unified view” is inconsistent identities: the same person appears under different emails, phone numbers or chat handles. Gemini can help by reasoning over patterns in interaction data to propose probable matches for review.

For instance, you can periodically feed Gemini a batch of candidate duplicate records and ask it to score match probability based on names, domains, writing style, topics and locations:

System: You help unify customer identities across systems.
Given two customer records and their interaction snippets, rate
if they are the same person on a scale from 0 (different) to 1 (same),
and explain your reasoning.

User:
Record A: {{record_a}}
Record B: {{record_b}}

Your data team can then use these scores to drive automated merges with safeguards, or to create “linked profiles” that the unified view can follow. This step directly strengthens the quality of your personalized customer interactions.

Personalize Offers and Next-Best Actions with Explicit Rules Plus AI

Don’t ask Gemini to invent commercial offers. Instead, combine your existing business logic (eligibility, pricing, stock) with Gemini’s ability to select and contextualize the best option for a given customer. Your system can first compute a list of eligible offers or actions and then ask Gemini to choose and frame the best one based on the unified profile.

Example configuration call:

System: You are a customer retention assistant.
You receive:
- unified customer profile & history
- a list of eligible offers and actions (JSON)

Choose 1-2 options that best fit the customer's situation.
Explain why in 2 bullet points and draft a short, personalized
message the agent can send.

User:
Profile: {{customer_profile_json}}
Eligible options: {{eligible_offers_json}}

This keeps AI-powered next-best actions safe and aligned with your commercial rules while still feeling highly personalized to the customer.

Monitor Quality with Human Feedback Loops and Clear KPIs

Once Gemini is live in customer service, set up a feedback loop. Let agents quickly rate the usefulness of each suggestion (“helpful / neutral / wrong”) and capture reasons in tags. Use this to refine prompts, training data, and which sources are included in the unified view.

Track a small set of KPIs: change in average handle time for targeted contact reasons, reduction in repeated questions per interaction, improvement in CSAT for interactions where Gemini was used, and share of responses accepted with minimal edits. Realistic targets for a first iteration are: 10–15% faster handling on complex cases, 20–30% reduction in time spent searching systems, and measurable CSAT uplift for previously fragmented journeys.

Over time, these metrics show whether your Gemini-based unified customer view is moving from experiment to dependable operational capability.

Expected outcomes of applying these best practices: a pragmatic path from fragmented records to actionable, AI-enriched profiles; faster and more confident agents; and more relevant, personalized interactions. In most environments we see tangible improvements within 6–12 weeks of focused implementation, without needing a multi-year data transformation first.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini can work as a reasoning layer on top of your fragmented systems. Instead of waiting for a perfect customer 360 platform, you expose the key data from CRM, ticketing, email and chat through a consolidated API or data view. For each interaction, your backend pulls the relevant records and passes them to Gemini with a structured prompt.

Gemini then summarizes the situation, highlights past issues and promises, and proposes personalized next steps for the agent. In other words, it “stitches together” a unified view at query time, so agents experience a coherent picture even if the underlying systems are still separate.

You typically need three capabilities: a cloud engineer or data engineer to expose the necessary customer data, a backend developer to integrate Gemini APIs into your CRM or contact center tools, and a product owner from customer service who defines workflows and guardrails. Frontend adjustments (e.g. an agent-assist sidebar) are usually lightweight.

On the AI side, prompt and workflow design is critical but does not require a research team. With Reruption’s approach, we usually work with your existing IT and service operations teams, adding our AI engineering depth and experience building AI assistants for customer service so you don’t have to build that expertise from scratch.

For a focused scope (e.g. one region, one product line, one priority channel), you can typically see first results within 6–8 weeks. The first 2–3 weeks go into clarifying use cases, mapping data sources, and setting up a minimal unified data layer. The next 3–4 weeks are used to build and iterate a Gemini-powered agent assist prototype with a small pilot group.

Meaningful improvements—like reduced handle time on complex cases, fewer repeat questions, and better CSAT for specific journeys—often show up in the pilot metrics within one or two reporting cycles. Scaling beyond the pilot depends on your change management and integration landscape but usually builds on the same foundation.

There are two cost components: implementation effort and ongoing usage. Implementation cost depends on your system complexity but can be kept lean by scoping tightly and reusing existing Google Cloud infrastructure. Ongoing Gemini API costs are driven by volume and context size; using a consolidated, focused data view keeps these predictable.

ROI is typically justified through a combination of efficiency gains and revenue impact: less time per complex interaction, fewer escalations, higher first contact resolution, and increased cross-sell/upsell where Gemini suggests relevant next-best actions. Many organizations can build a business case on a 10–15% productivity improvement for a subset of agents plus a small uplift in retention or expansion in key segments.

Reruption supports you end-to-end with a hands-on, Co-Preneur approach. We don’t just advise; we embed with your team, challenge assumptions, and build working solutions inside your existing tools. A practical starting point is our AI PoC for 9,900€, where we define a concrete customer service use case, validate the technical feasibility with Gemini, and deliver a functioning prototype plus performance metrics and a production roadmap.

From there, we can help you harden the architecture, address security and compliance, and scale AI-powered personalization across channels. Our focus is to prove that Gemini meaningfully improves your service KPIs in a small, low-risk scope—and then evolve it into a robust capability that truly replaces today’s fragmented workflows.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media