The Challenge: No Unified Customer View

Most customer service teams sit on a goldmine of information spread across CRM, ticketing systems, email inboxes, live chat, voice logs and feedback tools. The problem: none of it comes together in front of the agent. Every new interaction feels like starting from zero because there is no single, up‑to‑date customer view that combines history, preferences, issues and promises.

Traditional approaches try to solve this with manual notes, complex CRM customizations or rigid data warehouse projects. In practice, agents don’t have time to maintain perfect records, integrations break whenever tools change, and BI dashboards are built for managers, not for real-time service conversations. As channels multiply and volumes grow, these legacy approaches simply cannot keep up with the speed and complexity of modern customer service.

The business impact is significant: agents ask repeat questions, miss context from earlier channels, and give generic answers instead of tailored recommendations. Customers feel unknown and undervalued, which hurts CSAT, NPS and first contact resolution. At scale, this leads to longer handling times, higher staffing needs and lost upsell and cross-sell opportunities because you cannot confidently recommend the next best action for each person.

The good news: this problem is real but absolutely solvable. With modern AI applied to unified customer profiles and conversation histories, you can finally surface the right context at the right moment for every interaction. At Reruption, we have hands-on experience building AI assistants and chatbots that work with fragmented data, and we’ve seen how quickly service quality can improve once the foundations are right. In the rest of this page, you’ll find practical guidance on how to use Gemini in your contact center stack to move from fragmented records to truly personalized customer interactions.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI-powered assistants and customer service chatbots, we’ve seen that the real unlock is not just deploying another tool, but teaching AI to reason over your existing, messy data. Gemini, tightly integrated with Google Cloud and your contact center stack, can sit on top of CRM, ticketing, email and chat logs to generate a usable, unified view in real time—without waiting for a perfect data warehouse project. Our perspective: treat Gemini as a reasoning layer for personalized customer interactions, not just as another bot.

Define What “Unified Customer View” Actually Means for Your Service

Before connecting Gemini to every data source, get crystal clear on what your agents and customers actually need to see in a unified profile. For most service teams this means a concise picture: identity, recent interactions across channels, open and past issues, key preferences, and any promises or SLAs. Without this definition, you risk surfacing noise instead of useful context and your AI-powered personalization will feel random.

Map a few critical customer journeys—complaints, renewals, upgrades—and identify which pieces of data would have changed the outcome if the agent had known them. Use that as the core of your unified view. Gemini is flexible enough to reason over large amounts of data, but humans are not; the strategy is to have Gemini absorb the complexity and present only what matters for the current interaction.

Start with Agent Assist, Not Full Automation

When there is no unified customer view yet, jumping straight to fully automated AI-driven conversations creates risk. The smarter sequence is to start with Gemini as an agent co-pilot: it pulls together context from CRM, tickets and communications, drafts personalized responses and suggests next-best actions, while a human still owns the final decision.

This approach lets you validate personalization logic, spot data quality gaps and build trust internally. Agents quickly see where the AI is helpful and where the data is incomplete. Over time, as patterns stabilize, you can selectively automate low-risk scenarios (e.g. status requests, simple account questions) with confidence that Gemini is working with reliable, unified profiles.

Design Governance Around Data Access and Personalization Boundaries

A unified view powered by AI in customer service raises immediate questions: What is Gemini allowed to see? What can it propose? How do we control tone and compliance? Strategically, you need a clear governance model before scaling. This includes access rules (which data sources are in scope), retention policies for conversation logs, and explicit red lines for personalization (e.g. no use of sensitive attributes).

Involve legal, compliance and data protection early, but keep the discussion anchored in specific workflows, not abstract fears. Show them example Gemini outputs using synthetic or anonymized data. This collaborative approach reduces friction and ensures your AI-powered customer personalization respects both regulation and brand values.

Prepare Your Teams for AI-Augmented Service, Not Replacement

Personalization with Gemini will change how agents work: less searching, more decision-making. If your service team expects yet another tool that slows them down, adoption will suffer. If they understand Gemini as a way to eliminate repetitive context hunting and support better conversations, they will pull it into their workflows.

Set the right narrative early: you are building an AI assistant for customer service agents, not a replacement. Include agents in pilot design, ask them which context they always wish they had, and incorporate their feedback into prompt and workflow design. This not only improves the system but also builds the internal champions you need for broader roll-out.

Think in Use Cases and KPIs, Not in Technology Features

It’s easy to get lost in the capabilities of large models. Strategically, you should anchor your Gemini initiative in a small set of measurable use cases: for example, “reduce repeated questions by 30%”, “increase first contact resolution for high-value customers by 10%”, or “cut average handle time on complex cases by 15% through better context.” These targets align stakeholders and tell you whether your AI in the contact center is creating real value.

Prioritize use cases where fragmented data clearly hurts outcomes today: multi-channel complaints, recurring technical issues, or renewal risk. Then design how Gemini will consume data and assist agents in those flows. This outcome-first mindset aligns perfectly with Reruption’s co-preneur approach: we focus on business metrics in your P&L, not just on deploying another model.

Using Gemini to fix the lack of a unified customer view is less about building another dashboard and more about giving agents a real-time reasoning partner that understands the full customer history. When done well, it turns fragmented CRM, ticketing and communication data into concrete, personalized actions at every touchpoint. Reruption has the practical experience to move from concept to working Gemini-powered prototypes quickly, and to align them with your service KPIs; if you want to explore how this could look in your environment, we’re happy to co-design a focused, low-risk experiment with your team.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From News Media to Healthcare: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Associated Press (AP)

News Media

In the mid-2010s, the Associated Press (AP) faced significant constraints in its business newsroom due to limited manual resources. With only a handful of journalists dedicated to earnings coverage, AP could produce just around 300 quarterly earnings reports per quarter, primarily focusing on major S&P 500 companies. This manual process was labor-intensive: reporters had to extract data from financial filings, analyze key metrics like revenue, profits, and growth rates, and craft concise narratives under tight deadlines. As the number of publicly traded companies grew, AP struggled to cover smaller firms, leaving vast amounts of market-relevant information unreported. This limitation not only reduced AP's comprehensive market coverage but also tied up journalists on rote tasks, preventing them from pursuing investigative stories or deeper analysis. The pressure of quarterly earnings seasons amplified these issues, with deadlines coinciding across thousands of companies, making scalable reporting impossible without innovation.

Lösung

To address this, AP partnered with Automated Insights in 2014, implementing their Wordsmith NLG platform. Wordsmith uses templated algorithms to transform structured financial data—such as earnings per share, revenue figures, and year-over-year changes—into readable, journalistic prose. Reporters input verified data from sources like Zacks Investment Research, and the AI generates draft stories in seconds, which humans then lightly edit for accuracy and style. The solution involved creating custom NLG templates tailored to AP's style, ensuring stories sounded human-written while adhering to journalistic standards. This hybrid approach—AI for volume, humans for oversight—overcame quality concerns. By 2015, AP announced it would automate the majority of U.S. corporate earnings stories, scaling coverage dramatically without proportional staff increases.

Ergebnisse

  • 14x increase in quarterly earnings stories: 300 to 4,200
  • Coverage expanded to 4,000+ U.S. public companies per quarter
  • Equivalent to freeing time of 20 full-time reporters
  • Stories published in seconds vs. hours manually
  • Zero reported errors in automated stories post-implementation
  • Sustained use expanded to sports, weather, and lottery reports
Read case study →

NVIDIA

Manufacturing

In semiconductor manufacturing, chip floorplanning—the task of arranging macros and circuitry on a die—is notoriously complex and NP-hard. Even expert engineers spend months iteratively refining layouts to balance power, performance, and area (PPA), navigating trade-offs like wirelength minimization, density constraints, and routability. Traditional tools struggle with the explosive combinatorial search space, especially for modern chips with millions of cells and hundreds of macros, leading to suboptimal designs and delayed time-to-market. NVIDIA faced this acutely while designing high-performance GPUs, where poor floorplans amplify power consumption and hinder AI accelerator efficiency. Manual processes limited scalability for 2.7 million cell designs with 320 macros, risking bottlenecks in their accelerated computing roadmap. Overcoming human-intensive trial-and-error was critical to sustain leadership in AI chips.

Lösung

NVIDIA deployed deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to model floorplanning as a sequential decision process: an agent places macros one-by-one, learning optimal policies via trial and error. Graph neural networks (GNNs) encode the chip as a graph, capturing spatial relationships and predicting placement impacts. The agent uses a policy network trained on benchmarks like MCNC and GSRC, with rewards penalizing half-perimeter wirelength (HPWL), congestion, and overlap. Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) enables efficient exploration, transferable across designs. This AI-driven approach automates what humans do manually but explores vastly more configurations.

Ergebnisse

  • Design Time: 3 hours for 2.7M cells vs. months manually
  • Chip Scale: 2.7 million cells, 320 macros optimized
  • PPA Improvement: Superior or comparable to human designs
  • Training Efficiency: Under 6 hours total for production layouts
  • Benchmark Success: Outperforms on MCNC/GSRC suites
  • Speedup: 10-30% faster circuits in related RL designs
Read case study →

UPS

Logistics

UPS faced massive inefficiencies in delivery routing, with drivers navigating an astronomical number of possible route combinations—far exceeding the nanoseconds since Earth's existence. Traditional manual planning led to longer drive times, higher fuel consumption, and elevated operational costs, exacerbated by dynamic factors like traffic, package volumes, terrain, and customer availability. These issues not only inflated expenses but also contributed to significant CO2 emissions in an industry under pressure to go green. Key challenges included driver resistance to new technology, integration with legacy systems, and ensuring real-time adaptability without disrupting daily operations. Pilot tests revealed adoption hurdles, as drivers accustomed to familiar routes questioned the AI's suggestions, highlighting the human element in tech deployment. Scaling across 55,000 vehicles demanded robust infrastructure and data handling for billions of data points daily.

Lösung

UPS developed ORION (On-Road Integrated Optimization and Navigation), an AI-powered system blending operations research for mathematical optimization with machine learning for predictive analytics on traffic, weather, and delivery patterns. It dynamically recalculates routes in real-time, considering package destinations, vehicle capacity, right/left turn efficiencies, and stop sequences to minimize miles and time. The solution evolved from static planning to dynamic routing upgrades, incorporating agentic AI for autonomous decision-making. Training involved massive datasets from GPS telematics, with continuous ML improvements refining algorithms. Overcoming adoption challenges required driver training programs and gamification incentives, ensuring seamless integration via in-cab displays.

Ergebnisse

  • 100 million miles saved annually
  • $300-400 million cost savings per year
  • 10 million gallons of fuel reduced yearly
  • 100,000 metric tons CO2 emissions cut
  • 2-4 miles shorter routes per driver daily
  • 97% fleet deployment by 2021
Read case study →

Duke Health

Healthcare

Sepsis is a leading cause of hospital mortality, affecting over 1.7 million Americans annually with a 20-30% mortality rate when recognized late. At Duke Health, clinicians faced the challenge of early detection amid subtle, non-specific symptoms mimicking other conditions, leading to delayed interventions like antibiotics and fluids. Traditional scoring systems like qSOFA or NEWS suffered from low sensitivity (around 50-60%) and high false alarms, causing alert fatigue in busy wards and EDs. Additionally, integrating AI into real-time clinical workflows posed risks: ensuring model accuracy on diverse patient data, gaining clinician trust, and complying with regulations without disrupting care. Duke needed a custom, explainable model trained on its own EHR data to avoid vendor biases and enable seamless adoption across its three hospitals.

Lösung

Duke's Sepsis Watch is a deep learning model leveraging real-time EHR data (vitals, labs, demographics) to continuously monitor hospitalized patients and predict sepsis onset 6 hours in advance with high precision. Developed by the Duke Institute for Health Innovation (DIHI), it triggers nurse-facing alerts (Best Practice Advisories) only when risk exceeds thresholds, minimizing fatigue. The model was trained on Duke-specific data from 250,000+ encounters, achieving AUROC of 0.935 at 3 hours prior and 88% sensitivity at low false positive rates. Integration via Epic EHR used a human-centered design, involving clinicians in iterations to refine alerts and workflows, ensuring safe deployment without overriding clinical judgment.

Ergebnisse

  • AUROC: 0.935 for sepsis prediction 3 hours prior
  • Sensitivity: 88% at 3 hours early detection
  • Reduced time to antibiotics: 1.2 hours faster
  • Alert override rate: <10% (high clinician trust)
  • Sepsis bundle compliance: Improved by 20%
  • Mortality reduction: Associated with 12% drop in sepsis deaths
Read case study →

Nubank (Pix Payments)

Payments

Nubank, Latin America's largest digital bank serving over 114 million customers across Brazil, Mexico, and Colombia, faced the challenge of scaling its Pix instant payment system amid explosive growth. Traditional Pix transactions required users to navigate the app manually, leading to friction, especially for quick, on-the-go payments. This app navigation bottleneck increased processing time and limited accessibility for users preferring conversational interfaces like WhatsApp, where 80% of Brazilians communicate daily. Additionally, enabling secure, accurate interpretation of diverse inputs—voice commands, natural language text, and images (e.g., handwritten notes or receipts)—posed significant hurdles. Nubank needed to overcome accuracy issues in multimodal understanding, ensure compliance with Brazil's Central Bank regulations, and maintain trust in a high-stakes financial environment while handling millions of daily transactions.

Lösung

Nubank deployed a multimodal generative AI solution powered by OpenAI models, allowing customers to initiate Pix payments through voice messages, text instructions, or image uploads directly in the app or WhatsApp. The AI processes speech-to-text, natural language processing for intent extraction, and optical character recognition (OCR) for images, converting them into executable Pix transfers. Integrated seamlessly with Nubank's backend, the system verifies user identity, extracts key details like amount and recipient, and executes transactions in seconds, bypassing traditional app screens. This AI-first approach enhances convenience, speed, and safety, scaling operations without proportional human intervention.

Ergebnisse

  • 60% reduction in transaction processing time
  • Tested with 2 million users by end of 2024
  • Serves 114 million customers across 3 countries
  • Testing initiated August 2024
  • Processes voice, text, and image inputs for Pix
  • Enabled instant payments via WhatsApp integration
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Connect Gemini to a Consolidated, Privacy-Safe Data Layer

Instead of wiring Gemini directly into every system, create a consolidated data layer in Google Cloud that exposes the key elements of your customer 360 view: identifiers, interaction history, tickets, orders, preferences and key events. This can be a BigQuery view or a dedicated API that merges records across CRM, ticketing, email and chat.

Gemini then queries or is provided with this curated snapshot for each interaction. This keeps prompts small and fast, simplifies access control, and allows you to evolve source systems without breaking your AI layer. Apply pseudonymization or tokenization where possible so that AI for customer service personalization operates on the minimum personal data needed.

Use Structured Prompts to Turn Raw History into Actionable Context

A common failure mode is to dump entire ticket histories into Gemini and hope for the best. Instead, use structured prompts that tell Gemini exactly how to interpret the unified view and what to output for agents. This is where you turn raw data into a concise briefing plus a personalized suggestion.

For example, when an agent opens a case, your middleware can assemble a payload (recent tickets, orders, channels, sentiment) and call Gemini with a prompt like:

System: You are an AI assistant helping customer service agents.
You receive a unified customer profile and recent interaction history.

Your tasks:
1) Summarize the customer's situation in <= 5 bullet points.
2) Highlight any promises, SLAs, or open issues.
3) Propose 2-3 personalized next-best actions for the agent.
4) Draft a response in our brand tone: calm, clear, and proactive.

User:
Customer profile and history (JSON):
{{customer_context_json}}

Expected outcome: agents see a clear context summary and a tailored reply draft, instead of scrolling through multiple tools.

Implement Real-Time Agent Assist Widgets in Your Existing Tools

To make Gemini-powered personalization usable, surface it where agents already work—inside your CRM, helpdesk or contact center UI. Build a small sidebar or widget that, on ticket open or call connect, automatically calls Gemini with the unified context and displays:

  • a short customer summary
  • relevant past issues and resolutions
  • risk signals (churn risk, repeated complaints)
  • a suggested, personalized reply

Technically, this is often a lightweight integration: your frontend triggers a backend function that collects data from your consolidated layer, calls Gemini’s API with a structured prompt, and returns the result. Start with a read-only assistant; once agents trust it, you can add actions such as “create follow-up task” or “suggest tailored offer.”

Use Gemini to Normalize and Link Identities Across Channels

One root cause of “no unified view” is inconsistent identities: the same person appears under different emails, phone numbers or chat handles. Gemini can help by reasoning over patterns in interaction data to propose probable matches for review.

For instance, you can periodically feed Gemini a batch of candidate duplicate records and ask it to score match probability based on names, domains, writing style, topics and locations:

System: You help unify customer identities across systems.
Given two customer records and their interaction snippets, rate
if they are the same person on a scale from 0 (different) to 1 (same),
and explain your reasoning.

User:
Record A: {{record_a}}
Record B: {{record_b}}

Your data team can then use these scores to drive automated merges with safeguards, or to create “linked profiles” that the unified view can follow. This step directly strengthens the quality of your personalized customer interactions.

Personalize Offers and Next-Best Actions with Explicit Rules Plus AI

Don’t ask Gemini to invent commercial offers. Instead, combine your existing business logic (eligibility, pricing, stock) with Gemini’s ability to select and contextualize the best option for a given customer. Your system can first compute a list of eligible offers or actions and then ask Gemini to choose and frame the best one based on the unified profile.

Example configuration call:

System: You are a customer retention assistant.
You receive:
- unified customer profile & history
- a list of eligible offers and actions (JSON)

Choose 1-2 options that best fit the customer's situation.
Explain why in 2 bullet points and draft a short, personalized
message the agent can send.

User:
Profile: {{customer_profile_json}}
Eligible options: {{eligible_offers_json}}

This keeps AI-powered next-best actions safe and aligned with your commercial rules while still feeling highly personalized to the customer.

Monitor Quality with Human Feedback Loops and Clear KPIs

Once Gemini is live in customer service, set up a feedback loop. Let agents quickly rate the usefulness of each suggestion (“helpful / neutral / wrong”) and capture reasons in tags. Use this to refine prompts, training data, and which sources are included in the unified view.

Track a small set of KPIs: change in average handle time for targeted contact reasons, reduction in repeated questions per interaction, improvement in CSAT for interactions where Gemini was used, and share of responses accepted with minimal edits. Realistic targets for a first iteration are: 10–15% faster handling on complex cases, 20–30% reduction in time spent searching systems, and measurable CSAT uplift for previously fragmented journeys.

Over time, these metrics show whether your Gemini-based unified customer view is moving from experiment to dependable operational capability.

Expected outcomes of applying these best practices: a pragmatic path from fragmented records to actionable, AI-enriched profiles; faster and more confident agents; and more relevant, personalized interactions. In most environments we see tangible improvements within 6–12 weeks of focused implementation, without needing a multi-year data transformation first.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini can work as a reasoning layer on top of your fragmented systems. Instead of waiting for a perfect customer 360 platform, you expose the key data from CRM, ticketing, email and chat through a consolidated API or data view. For each interaction, your backend pulls the relevant records and passes them to Gemini with a structured prompt.

Gemini then summarizes the situation, highlights past issues and promises, and proposes personalized next steps for the agent. In other words, it “stitches together” a unified view at query time, so agents experience a coherent picture even if the underlying systems are still separate.

You typically need three capabilities: a cloud engineer or data engineer to expose the necessary customer data, a backend developer to integrate Gemini APIs into your CRM or contact center tools, and a product owner from customer service who defines workflows and guardrails. Frontend adjustments (e.g. an agent-assist sidebar) are usually lightweight.

On the AI side, prompt and workflow design is critical but does not require a research team. With Reruption’s approach, we usually work with your existing IT and service operations teams, adding our AI engineering depth and experience building AI assistants for customer service so you don’t have to build that expertise from scratch.

For a focused scope (e.g. one region, one product line, one priority channel), you can typically see first results within 6–8 weeks. The first 2–3 weeks go into clarifying use cases, mapping data sources, and setting up a minimal unified data layer. The next 3–4 weeks are used to build and iterate a Gemini-powered agent assist prototype with a small pilot group.

Meaningful improvements—like reduced handle time on complex cases, fewer repeat questions, and better CSAT for specific journeys—often show up in the pilot metrics within one or two reporting cycles. Scaling beyond the pilot depends on your change management and integration landscape but usually builds on the same foundation.

There are two cost components: implementation effort and ongoing usage. Implementation cost depends on your system complexity but can be kept lean by scoping tightly and reusing existing Google Cloud infrastructure. Ongoing Gemini API costs are driven by volume and context size; using a consolidated, focused data view keeps these predictable.

ROI is typically justified through a combination of efficiency gains and revenue impact: less time per complex interaction, fewer escalations, higher first contact resolution, and increased cross-sell/upsell where Gemini suggests relevant next-best actions. Many organizations can build a business case on a 10–15% productivity improvement for a subset of agents plus a small uplift in retention or expansion in key segments.

Reruption supports you end-to-end with a hands-on, Co-Preneur approach. We don’t just advise; we embed with your team, challenge assumptions, and build working solutions inside your existing tools. A practical starting point is our AI PoC for 9,900€, where we define a concrete customer service use case, validate the technical feasibility with Gemini, and deliver a functioning prototype plus performance metrics and a production roadmap.

From there, we can help you harden the architecture, address security and compliance, and scale AI-powered personalization across channels. Our focus is to prove that Gemini meaningfully improves your service KPIs in a small, low-risk scope—and then evolve it into a robust capability that truly replaces today’s fragmented workflows.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media