The Challenge: Repetitive Simple Inquiries

In most customer service operations, a large share of tickets are not complex edge cases but the same small set of basic questions: opening hours, delivery status, pricing details, password resets, simple how-tos. Agents spend hours every day answering near-identical requests, even though the information already exists in FAQs, knowledge bases, or internal systems. This repetitive work creates frustration for both customers and staff.

Traditional approaches such as static FAQ pages, basic keyword chatbots, or IVR menus were supposed to solve this, but they rarely match how customers actually ask questions. Users phrase requests in natural language, mix multiple topics, or include context like “I’m traveling tomorrow” that simple search or rule-based bots can’t interpret. As a result, customers either give up on self-service or bypass it entirely and go straight to an agent, recreating the bottleneck.

The business impact is significant: high contact volumes drive up support costs, waiting times increase, and complex issues wait longer in the queue. Agents feel their skills are underused, which affects retention. Leadership loses opportunities to redeploy capacity to proactive outreach or value-creating activities. Meanwhile, competitors that offer fast, AI-powered self-service appear more responsive and modern, raising the bar for customer expectations.

The good news: this is exactly the type of problem modern AI is well suited to solve. With tools like Gemini, repetitive simple inquiries can be handled automatically in natural language, across channels, using your existing knowledge. At Reruption, we’ve seen how well-designed AI assistants can transform support workloads, and in the sections below we’ll walk through practical steps to use Gemini to deflect simple inquiries without compromising service quality.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s experience building AI customer service solutions and intelligent chatbots, we see Gemini as a strong fit for handling repetitive simple inquiries at scale. When implemented correctly, Gemini can sit in front of your contact channels, understand natural language, and use company knowledge to resolve the bulk of basic questions before they ever reach an agent.

Think in Journeys, Not Just a Smarter FAQ

Many organisations approach AI deflection of simple inquiries as a smarter FAQ search. In practice, what matters to customers is the end-to-end journey: from asking a question in their own words to getting a confident, actionable answer in seconds. When you evaluate Gemini, map the top 10–20 inquiry types (opening hours, order status, password reset, subscription changes) as complete mini-journeys, including follow-up questions and edge cases.

Strategically, this means designing the Gemini experience to guide customers, not just answer a single question. For example, after providing opening hours, Gemini might ask “Do you want me to help you book an appointment?” or after a password reset explanation, offer “Should I send you the reset link now?”. This journey-first mindset turns AI from a passive knowledge layer into an active self-service assistant that genuinely deflects contact volume.

Anchor Gemini on Authoritative, Maintained Knowledge

For AI customer service automation to be trusted, the underlying information needs to be correct and up to date. Strategically, this requires governance: decide which systems are the source of truth for pricing, policies, opening hours, and how-tos, and ensure that Gemini is connected to these sources rather than to ad hoc documents scattered across drives.

Reruption typically recommends creating a clear ownership model: product, legal, and support teams know which content they are responsible for, and how updates flow into the AI. With Gemini, this might mean connecting to Google Drive, Confluence, or your CRM and defining which collections are “authoritative”. Without this content strategy, even the best model will produce inconsistent answers, and agents will resist relying on AI suggestions.

Start with High-Volume, Low-Risk Use Cases

To build organisational confidence, prioritise high-volume, low-risk repetitive inquiries for your initial Gemini deployment. These are questions where an incorrect answer is annoying but not business-critical: opening hours by location, standard shipping times, basic return rules, or step-by-step usage tips.

This strategic focus keeps legal, compliance, and risk stakeholders comfortable while still delivering visible relief to the service team. As you monitor accuracy and customer satisfaction, you can gradually expand Gemini’s scope to more nuanced topics (e.g. pricing exceptions, special conditions) using human-in-the-loop review before full automation.

Prepare Your Team for AI-Augmented Workflows

Deflecting simple inquiries with Gemini changes the work profile of your customer service agents: fewer repetitive tickets, more complex and emotionally charged cases. That shift is positive, but it requires preparation. Communicate early that AI is there to remove low-value tasks, not jobs, and involve frontline agents in designing and testing the Gemini flows.

From a strategic HR and operations perspective, consider new metrics and incentives: focus on quality of complex case handling, first-contact resolution for escalations, and effective use of AI suggestions rather than pure ticket count. When agents feel that Gemini is a colleague that removes drudgery, adoption and overall service quality improve significantly.

Plan for Governance, Monitoring, and Continuous Improvement

Launching a Gemini-powered assistant is not a one-off project; it’s a new capability. Define upfront how you will monitor deflection rate, answer quality, and customer satisfaction. Decide who reviews conversation logs, who can change prompts and policies, and how feedback from agents and customers feeds into improvements.

Strategically, this governance layer is where many AI initiatives fail. At Reruption, we advocate for a lightweight but clear operating model: monthly review of metrics, a small cross-functional AI working group (support, product, IT), and a backlog of improvements to Gemini’s behavior and knowledge. This ensures your AI support assistant keeps pace with your business, instead of decaying into another abandoned tool.

Used thoughtfully, Gemini in customer service can absorb a large share of repetitive simple inquiries and free your agents to focus on the complex, human conversations that really matter. The key is to treat it as a new service capability – grounded in solid knowledge, clear governance, and agent buy-in – rather than just another chatbot widget. Reruption combines deep AI engineering with hands-on service operations experience to help you design, prototype, and scale this kind of Gemini-powered deflection; if you want to explore what this could look like in your environment, we’re ready to build it with you.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Energy to Banking: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Shell

Energy

Unplanned equipment failures in refineries and offshore oil rigs plagued Shell, causing significant downtime, safety incidents, and costly repairs that eroded profitability in a capital-intensive industry. According to a Deloitte 2024 report, 35% of refinery downtime is unplanned, with 70% preventable via advanced analytics—highlighting the gap in traditional scheduled maintenance approaches that missed subtle failure precursors in assets like pumps, valves, and compressors. Shell's vast global operations amplified these issues, generating terabytes of sensor data from thousands of assets that went underutilized due to data silos, legacy systems, and manual analysis limitations. Failures could cost millions per hour, risking environmental spills and personnel safety while pressuring margins amid volatile energy markets.

Lösung

Shell partnered with C3 AI to implement an AI-powered predictive maintenance platform, leveraging machine learning models trained on real-time IoT sensor data, maintenance histories, and operational metrics to forecast failures and optimize interventions. Integrated with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning, the solution detects anomalies, predicts remaining useful life (RUL), and prioritizes high-risk assets across upstream oil rigs and downstream refineries. The scalable C3 AI platform enabled rapid deployment, starting with pilots on critical equipment and expanding globally. It automates predictive analytics, shifting from reactive to proactive maintenance, and provides actionable insights via intuitive dashboards for engineers.

Ergebnisse

  • 20% reduction in unplanned downtime
  • 15% slash in maintenance costs
  • £1M+ annual savings per site
  • 10,000 pieces of equipment monitored globally
  • 35% industry unplanned downtime addressed (Deloitte benchmark)
  • 70% preventable failures mitigated
Read case study →

Netflix

Streaming Media

With over 17,000 titles and growing, Netflix faced the classic cold start problem and data sparsity in recommendations, where new users or obscure content lacked sufficient interaction data, leading to poor personalization and higher churn rates . Viewers often struggled to discover engaging content among thousands of options, resulting in prolonged browsing times and disengagement—estimated at up to 75% of session time wasted on searching rather than watching . This risked subscriber loss in a competitive streaming market, where retaining users costs far less than acquiring new ones. Scalability was another hurdle: handling 200M+ subscribers generating billions of daily interactions required processing petabytes of data in real-time, while evolving viewer tastes demanded adaptive models beyond traditional collaborative filtering limitations like the popularity bias favoring mainstream hits . Early systems post-Netflix Prize (2006-2009) improved accuracy but struggled with contextual factors like device, time, and mood .

Lösung

Netflix built a hybrid recommendation engine combining collaborative filtering (CF)—starting with FunkSVD and Probabilistic Matrix Factorization from the Netflix Prize—and advanced deep learning models for embeddings and predictions . They consolidated multiple use-case models into a single multi-task neural network, improving performance and maintainability while supporting search, home page, and row recommendations . Key innovations include contextual bandits for exploration-exploitation, A/B testing on thumbnails and metadata, and content-based features from computer vision/audio analysis to mitigate cold starts . Real-time inference on Kubernetes clusters processes 100s of millions of predictions per user session, personalized by viewing history, ratings, pauses, and even search queries . This evolved from 2009 Prize winners to transformer-based architectures by 2023 .

Ergebnisse

  • 80% of viewer hours from recommendations
  • $1B+ annual savings in subscriber retention
  • 75% reduction in content browsing time
  • 10% RMSE improvement from Netflix Prize CF techniques
  • 93% of views from personalized rows
  • Handles billions of daily interactions for 270M subscribers
Read case study →

Zalando

E-commerce

In the online fashion retail sector, high return rates—often exceeding 30-40% for apparel—stem primarily from fit and sizing uncertainties, as customers cannot physically try on items before purchase . Zalando, Europe's largest fashion e-tailer serving 27 million active customers across 25 markets, faced substantial challenges with these returns, incurring massive logistics costs, environmental impact, and customer dissatisfaction due to inconsistent sizing across over 6,000 brands and 150,000+ products . Traditional size charts and recommendations proved insufficient, with early surveys showing up to 50% of returns attributed to poor fit perception, hindering conversion rates and repeat purchases in a competitive market . This was compounded by the lack of immersive shopping experiences online, leading to hesitation among tech-savvy millennials and Gen Z shoppers who demanded more personalized, visual tools.

Lösung

Zalando addressed these pain points by deploying a generative computer vision-powered virtual try-on solution, enabling users to upload selfies or use avatars to see realistic garment overlays tailored to their body shape and measurements . Leveraging machine learning models for pose estimation, body segmentation, and AI-generated rendering, the tool predicts optimal sizes and simulates draping effects, integrating with Zalando's ML platform for scalable personalization . The system combines computer vision (e.g., for landmark detection) with generative AI techniques to create hyper-realistic visualizations, drawing from vast datasets of product images, customer data, and 3D scans, ultimately aiming to cut returns while enhancing engagement . Piloted online and expanded to outlets, it forms part of Zalando's broader AI ecosystem including size predictors and style assistants.

Ergebnisse

  • 30,000+ customers used virtual fitting room shortly after launch
  • 5-10% projected reduction in return rates
  • Up to 21% fewer wrong-size returns via related AI size tools
  • Expanded to all physical outlets by 2023 for jeans category
  • Supports 27 million customers across 25 European markets
  • Part of AI strategy boosting personalization for 150,000+ products
Read case study →

Unilever

Human Resources

Unilever, a consumer goods giant handling 1.8 million job applications annually, struggled with a manual recruitment process that was extremely time-consuming and inefficient . Traditional methods took up to four months to fill positions, overburdening recruiters and delaying talent acquisition across its global operations . The process also risked unconscious biases in CV screening and interviews, limiting workforce diversity and potentially overlooking qualified candidates from underrepresented groups . High volumes made it impossible to assess every applicant thoroughly, leading to high costs estimated at millions annually and inconsistent hiring quality . Unilever needed a scalable, fair system to streamline early-stage screening while maintaining psychometric rigor.

Lösung

Unilever adopted an AI-powered recruitment funnel partnering with Pymetrics for neuroscience-based gamified assessments that measure cognitive, emotional, and behavioral traits via ML algorithms trained on diverse global data . This was followed by AI-analyzed video interviews using computer vision and NLP to evaluate body language, facial expressions, tone of voice, and word choice objectively . Applications were anonymized to minimize bias, with AI shortlisting top 10-20% of candidates for human review, integrating psychometric ML models for personality profiling . The system was piloted in high-volume entry-level roles before global rollout .

Ergebnisse

  • Time-to-hire: 90% reduction (4 months to 4 weeks)
  • Recruiter time saved: 50,000 hours
  • Annual cost savings: £1 million
  • Diversity hires increase: 16% (incl. neuro-atypical candidates)
  • Candidates shortlisted for humans: 90% reduction
  • Applications processed: 1.8 million/year
Read case study →

Commonwealth Bank of Australia (CBA)

Banking

As Australia's largest bank, CBA faced escalating scam and fraud threats, with customers suffering significant financial losses. Scammers exploited rapid digital payments like PayID, where mismatched payee names led to irreversible transfers. Traditional detection lagged behind sophisticated attacks, resulting in high customer harm and regulatory pressure. Simultaneously, contact centers were overwhelmed, handling millions of inquiries on fraud alerts and transactions. This led to long wait times, increased operational costs, and strained resources. CBA needed proactive, scalable AI to intervene in real-time while reducing reliance on human agents.

Lösung

CBA deployed a hybrid AI stack blending machine learning for anomaly detection and generative AI for personalized warnings. NameCheck verifies payee names against PayID in real-time, alerting users to mismatches. CallerCheck authenticates inbound calls, blocking impersonation scams. Partnering with H2O.ai, CBA implemented GenAI-driven predictive models for scam intelligence. An AI virtual assistant in the CommBank app handles routine queries, generates natural responses, and escalates complex issues. Integration with Apate.ai provides near real-time scam intel, enhancing proactive blocking across channels.

Ergebnisse

  • 70% reduction in scam losses
  • 50% cut in customer fraud losses by 2024
  • 30% drop in fraud cases via proactive warnings
  • 40% reduction in contact center wait times
  • 95%+ accuracy in NameCheck payee matching
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Map and Prioritise Your Top 20 Repetitive Inquiries

Before you configure Gemini, quantify the problem. Export the last 3–6 months of tickets from your helpdesk (e.g. Zendesk, Freshdesk, ServiceNow) and cluster them by topic. Identify the 20 most frequent repetitive simple inquiries such as “opening hours”, “order tracking”, “password reset”, “invoice copy”, or “change of address”.

For each topic, document: typical customer phrasing, required data sources (e.g. CRM for order status), risk level, and whether an automated resolution is possible end-to-end. This gives you a concrete backlog of use cases to implement with Gemini and a baseline to measure deflection gains against.

Design Robust Gemini Prompts for Customer-Facing Chatbots

Gemini’s behavior in a chatbot or contact form assistant is heavily influenced by its system prompt. Craft a clear, constrained role that reflects your brand tone and support policies. Explicitly tell Gemini what it can and cannot do, when to ask for clarification, and when to escalate to a human agent.

Example Gemini system prompt for repetitive inquiries:
You are a customer service assistant for <Company>.
Your goals:
- Answer simple, repetitive questions (opening hours, pricing basics, order status,
  password resets, basic how-tos) using the provided knowledge and tools.
- If information is missing or sensitive, ask concise clarification questions.
- If the question is complex, involves complaints, legal issues, or special conditions,
  politely route the customer to a human agent.

Guidelines:
- Be concise, friendly, and clear.
- Prefer bullet points for step-by-step instructions.
- Never invent policy details. If unsure, say you don't know and propose to
  connect the customer with an agent.

Test this prompt with real historical questions and refine based on failure cases (e.g. when Gemini overconfidently answers something that should be escalated). A well-designed prompt is one of the most effective levers for safe and useful AI-powered self-service.

Connect Gemini to Your Knowledge Base and Key Systems

To move beyond generic answers, integrate Gemini with your actual data sources. In a Google-centric environment, start by connecting relevant Google Drive folders, Docs, Sheets, and Sites that contain up-to-date FAQs, product information, and process descriptions. Define a curated “support knowledge” collection rather than giving access to everything.

For dynamic data such as order status or subscription details, architect a simple API layer that Gemini can call via your chatbot platform. For example, when a customer asks “Where is my order?”, Gemini parses the order number, calls your order API, and then explains the status in natural language instead of sending the customer to a separate portal.

Typical workflow:
1) Customer asks: "Where is my order 12345?"
2) Gemini extracts order number and calls /api/orders/12345
3) API returns: { status: "Shipped", eta: "2025-01-15" }
4) Gemini responds: "Your order 12345 was shipped on 2025-01-10 and is
   expected to arrive on 2025-01-15. You can track it here: <link>"

This combination of static knowledge and live system access is what turns Gemini into a practical virtual support agent instead of just a smart FAQ search.

Deploy Gemini as a First-Line Filter in Contact Channels

To maximise support volume deflection, place Gemini at the entry point of your most-used channels: website chat, in-app support widgets, and contact forms. Configure the flow so that Gemini attempts to resolve the issue first, with a clear and easy path to an agent when needed.

For a contact form, you can implement Gemini as a “pre-submit assistant”: as soon as the customer starts typing their issue, Gemini suggests answers and self-service links in real time. If the customer confirms that their issue is solved, the ticket is never created. If they proceed anyway, attach Gemini’s summary and context to the ticket so the agent can respond faster.

Example Gemini assistant behavior on a contact form:
- Read the subject and description fields as the user types.
- Offer 1–3 suggested answers or FAQ articles in a sidebar.
- Show a button: "Yes, this solves my issue" / "I still need help".
- If solved: don't create a ticket, log a deflected contact.
- If not solved: create a ticket with a Gemini-generated summary
  and proposed answer for the agent to review.

This pattern both deflects simple issues and accelerates handling of the remaining, more complex cases.

Use Gemini Internally to Suggest Agent Responses

Even after deploying customer-facing AI, some repetitive inquiries will still reach agents. Here, Gemini can work behind the scenes to accelerate responses and ensure consistency. Integrate Gemini into your helpdesk so that for every new ticket, it generates a proposed reply based on the customer message and your knowledge base.

Example Gemini prompt for agent assist:
You assist customer service agents.
Given the customer message and the internal knowledge articles,
write a proposed reply that the agent can send after review.
- Keep it short and clear.
- Include relevant links or attachments mentioned in the knowledge.
- Highlight any assumptions or points the agent should double-check.

Customer message:
{{ticket_text}}

Relevant knowledge:
{{kb_snippets}}

Agents remain in control but can resolve simple, repetitive tickets in a few clicks rather than rewriting the same answer dozens of times per day. Track metrics like “percentage of replies sent with minimal edits” to quantify time savings.

Instrument, Measure, and Iterate on Deflection and Quality

To make Gemini-powered support sustainable, build measurement into your implementation from day one. Log every interaction with flags for “resolved by AI”, “escalated to agent”, and “customer dropped”. Attach simple satisfaction signals (thumbs up/down or a one-question survey) to AI responses.

On a monthly basis, review:

  • Deflection rate for top inquiry types (e.g. 40–60% of "opening hours" questions resolved by Gemini).
  • Average handle time for tickets that received a Gemini draft reply vs. those that did not.
  • Customer satisfaction scores on AI-resolved vs. agent-resolved simple tickets.

Use these insights to adjust prompts, add missing knowledge articles, or change escalation rules. A realistic target after an initial 8–12 week iteration cycle is to deflect 25–40% of eligible simple inquiries and cut handling time for the remaining ones by 20–30%, without degrading customer satisfaction.

Implemented with this level of rigor, a Gemini-based solution for repetitive simple inquiries can materially reduce ticket volumes, improve perceived responsiveness, and free your customer service team to focus on complex, value-creating interactions.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini is well suited for high-volume, low-complexity questions that follow clear rules and are backed by stable knowledge. Typical examples include:

  • Opening hours, location details, and contact information
  • Order status, shipping times, and basic tracking questions
  • Password resets, account access, and login troubleshooting
  • Standard pricing information and basic product features
  • Simple how-tos ("How do I update my address?", "How do I download my invoice?")

As long as your policies are clear and the necessary data is available via a knowledge base or API, Gemini can answer these inquiries reliably and in natural language, significantly reducing the volume that reaches agents.

The initial implementation timeline depends on your existing infrastructure and clarity of use cases, but many organisations can launch a focused pilot within 4–8 weeks. A typical sequence looks like this:

  • Week 1–2: Analyse historical tickets, define top repetitive inquiries, identify data sources.
  • Week 2–4: Configure Gemini prompts, connect knowledge sources, and build a basic chatbot or contact form integration.
  • Week 4–6: Internal testing with support agents, refine prompts and escalation rules.
  • Week 6–8: Limited public rollout, measurement of deflection and satisfaction, first optimisation cycle.

Reruption’s AI PoC offering is designed to compress the early stages: we typically deliver a working prototype for a targeted set of inquiries in a few weeks, so you can validate real-world performance before investing in a full rollout.

You don’t need a full data science team, but you do need a few key ingredients:

  • Customer service lead who understands the most common inquiries and pain points.
  • Content owner for maintaining accurate FAQs, how-tos, and policy documents.
  • Technical support (internal IT or external partner) to integrate Gemini with your website, helpdesk, and data sources.
  • Operations or product owner to monitor performance metrics and coordinate improvements.

Reruption typically fills the AI architecture and engineering gaps, while your team provides domain knowledge and access to systems. Over time, we help you build internal capability so you can maintain and extend your AI-powered self-service without heavy external dependency.

ROI will vary by industry and starting point, but there are some typical patterns when Gemini is applied to repetitive simple inquiries:

  • Contact deflection: 20–40% reduction in eligible simple inquiries reaching agents, once prompts and knowledge are tuned.
  • Agent productivity: 20–30% faster handling for remaining simple tickets when using Gemini-generated draft replies.
  • Customer experience: Faster answers 24/7 for basic questions, with no need to wait in queue for an agent.

Financially, this usually translates into either reduced need for peak staffing or the ability to absorb growth in contact volume without adding headcount. A structured pilot with clear baselines (ticket volume, AHT, CSAT) will let you quantify ROI within a few months of deployment.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur alongside your team to turn the idea of AI deflection into a working solution. We typically start with our AI PoC offering (9,900€), where we:

  • Define and scope your highest-impact repetitive inquiry use cases.
  • Validate technical feasibility with Gemini, your knowledge sources, and your existing tools.
  • Build a functioning prototype chatbot or contact form assistant that resolves real customer questions.
  • Measure performance (deflection rate, quality, speed, cost per interaction) and outline a production-ready architecture.

After the PoC, we can support you through full-scale implementation: integrating Gemini into your channels, setting up governance and monitoring, and training your team to maintain and extend the solution. Because we operate in your P&L, not in slide decks, our focus is on shipping a Gemini-based customer service capability that measurably reduces repetitive ticket volume and makes your support organisation more resilient.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media