The Challenge: Limited 24/7 Support Coverage

Most customer service teams are built around business hours, while customer expectations are not. Customers submit tickets at night, on weekends, and across time zones, only to be met with long waits, generic autoresponders, or vague promises of a callback. By the time your team comes online in the morning, a backlog of unresolved issues and frustrated customers is already waiting.

Traditional fixes for limited 24/7 coverage are expensive and inflexible. Hiring and retaining night and weekend agents drives up support costs and adds scheduling complexity. Outsourcing after-hours support often leads to inconsistent quality, limited product knowledge, and fragmented tools and processes. Simple FAQs or static help centers don’t satisfy customers with account-specific questions, complex orders, or urgent issues that need more than a generic answer.

The business impact is substantial. Overnight queues turn into morning spikes that overwhelm agents, extending resolution times well into the day. Global customers feel like second-class citizens when they always land outside your core hours. Poor experiences in critical moments translate into churn, negative reviews, and lost expansion opportunities. Meanwhile, your most experienced agents spend their time firefighting yesterday’s backlog instead of focusing on high-value interactions and continuous improvement.

The good news: this gap is now solvable without building a 24/7 call center. Modern AI customer service automation with tools like Gemini can handle a large share of after-hours conversations, escalate only what truly needs a human, and keep information in sync across systems. At Reruption, we’ve helped organisations design and deploy AI assistants that work alongside their teams, not against them. In the sections below, you’ll find practical guidance to turn limited 24/7 coverage into a predictable, automated capability.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s experience building real-world AI customer service solutions, the most successful 24/7 setups treat Gemini as a virtual team member embedded into existing workflows, not as a flashy widget on the website. When designed correctly, a Gemini-based virtual agent for customer support can handle common after-hours requests, integrate with your back-end systems via API, and route complex issues to humans without creating new silos or risks.

Design 24/7 Automation Around Customer Journeys, Not Channels

Before switching on any Gemini chatbot, map when and why customers contact you outside business hours. Typical patterns include order status checks, password or account issues, scheduling/rescheduling, and basic troubleshooting. These journeys often span web, mobile apps, and email — and sometimes the wider Google ecosystem. Your automation strategy should reflect these real journeys rather than just “adding a bot to the website.”

Take a strategic view: define which steps in each journey can be safely automated 24/7, which must always involve a human, and which can be hybrid (AI first, human fallback). This ensures the Gemini virtual agent doesn’t simply deflect tickets, but actually resolves them or sets up agents for success when they come online. The result is coverage that feels continuous and coherent, not fragmented by time of day or channel.

Position Gemini as a Tier-0/Tier-1 Agent, Not a Full Replacement

Organisations often over- or under-estimate what AI in customer service can do. Strategically, Gemini is best positioned as a Tier-0/Tier-1 agent: handle FAQs, status lookups, simple account changes, and guided troubleshooting, then escalate to humans with rich context. This framing helps internal stakeholders, especially support leaders, understand that the goal is to free human agents for complex work, not to eliminate them.

When you design Gemini as part of a tiered support model, you can set clear boundaries: which intents are always safe to automate, which require human approval, and which are blocked entirely. This reduces risk, simplifies compliance discussions, and makes change management with your support team far smoother.

Invest Early in Knowledge and API Readiness

Gemini’s value in 24/7 support depends heavily on what it can “see” and “do.” Strategically, this means preparing two key assets: your support knowledge base and your operational APIs. Clean, up-to-date documentation, policy descriptions, and troubleshooting guides give Gemini a reliable knowledge foundation. Well-scoped APIs to your CRM, ticketing, and order management systems allow it to act (e.g. check order status, update contact details) instead of just answering in generalities.

We often see organisations jump straight to conversation design without validating these foundations. A better approach is to treat knowledge and APIs as first-class citizens in your roadmap. This may require collaboration between customer service, IT, and product teams — but it’s exactly what turns a simple FAQ bot into a 24/7 virtual agent that actually resolves issues.

Align Support, IT, and Compliance Around Guardrails

Unlimited 24/7 responses can worry compliance, legal, and security teams. Strategically, you want all stakeholders aligned on the guardrails for a Gemini-based customer service assistant: what data it can access, what actions it may perform on behalf of customers, how it handles authentication, and how conversations are logged and audited.

Set up a small cross-functional working group early: support operations, IT, security/compliance, and a product owner for the AI assistant. Define policies for PII handling, consent, data residency (where relevant), and escalation rules. With clear guardrails, you avoid late-stage blockers and build organisational trust in the system’s behaviour, which is essential when the assistant is talking to your customers 24/7.

Measure Impact Beyond “Deflection Rate”

While many teams focus on ticket deflection, that metric alone doesn’t capture the strategic impact of fixing limited 24/7 support coverage. You should also track overnight backlog reduction, first response time for global customers, average handle time in the first morning hours, and NPS/CSAT by time of day.

By setting these KPIs up front, you can systematically tune your Gemini assistant to support business outcomes, not just chatbot engagement statistics. This also gives leadership a clearer picture of ROI: reduced overtime, fewer emergency hires for night shifts, more stable service quality across time zones, and agents freed up to focus on complex, relationship-building interactions.

Using Gemini for 24/7 customer support automation is less about plugging in a bot and more about reshaping how your service organisation works around the clock. With the right journeys, guardrails, and integrations, Gemini can handle a significant share of after-hours demand and prevent the morning backlog that drains your team. Reruption brings both AI engineering depth and hands-on experience in building operational assistants, which means we can help you design, prototype, and deploy a Gemini-based virtual agent that fits your real-world constraints. If you’re exploring how to close your 24/7 coverage gap without building a night shift, we’re ready to work through the details with you.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Healthcare to Healthcare: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Duke Health

Healthcare

Sepsis is a leading cause of hospital mortality, affecting over 1.7 million Americans annually with a 20-30% mortality rate when recognized late. At Duke Health, clinicians faced the challenge of early detection amid subtle, non-specific symptoms mimicking other conditions, leading to delayed interventions like antibiotics and fluids. Traditional scoring systems like qSOFA or NEWS suffered from low sensitivity (around 50-60%) and high false alarms, causing alert fatigue in busy wards and EDs. Additionally, integrating AI into real-time clinical workflows posed risks: ensuring model accuracy on diverse patient data, gaining clinician trust, and complying with regulations without disrupting care. Duke needed a custom, explainable model trained on its own EHR data to avoid vendor biases and enable seamless adoption across its three hospitals.

Lösung

Duke's Sepsis Watch is a deep learning model leveraging real-time EHR data (vitals, labs, demographics) to continuously monitor hospitalized patients and predict sepsis onset 6 hours in advance with high precision. Developed by the Duke Institute for Health Innovation (DIHI), it triggers nurse-facing alerts (Best Practice Advisories) only when risk exceeds thresholds, minimizing fatigue. The model was trained on Duke-specific data from 250,000+ encounters, achieving AUROC of 0.935 at 3 hours prior and 88% sensitivity at low false positive rates. Integration via Epic EHR used a human-centered design, involving clinicians in iterations to refine alerts and workflows, ensuring safe deployment without overriding clinical judgment.

Ergebnisse

  • AUROC: 0.935 for sepsis prediction 3 hours prior
  • Sensitivity: 88% at 3 hours early detection
  • Reduced time to antibiotics: 1.2 hours faster
  • Alert override rate: <10% (high clinician trust)
  • Sepsis bundle compliance: Improved by 20%
  • Mortality reduction: Associated with 12% drop in sepsis deaths
Read case study →

Shell

Energy

Unplanned equipment failures in refineries and offshore oil rigs plagued Shell, causing significant downtime, safety incidents, and costly repairs that eroded profitability in a capital-intensive industry. According to a Deloitte 2024 report, 35% of refinery downtime is unplanned, with 70% preventable via advanced analytics—highlighting the gap in traditional scheduled maintenance approaches that missed subtle failure precursors in assets like pumps, valves, and compressors. Shell's vast global operations amplified these issues, generating terabytes of sensor data from thousands of assets that went underutilized due to data silos, legacy systems, and manual analysis limitations. Failures could cost millions per hour, risking environmental spills and personnel safety while pressuring margins amid volatile energy markets.

Lösung

Shell partnered with C3 AI to implement an AI-powered predictive maintenance platform, leveraging machine learning models trained on real-time IoT sensor data, maintenance histories, and operational metrics to forecast failures and optimize interventions. Integrated with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning, the solution detects anomalies, predicts remaining useful life (RUL), and prioritizes high-risk assets across upstream oil rigs and downstream refineries. The scalable C3 AI platform enabled rapid deployment, starting with pilots on critical equipment and expanding globally. It automates predictive analytics, shifting from reactive to proactive maintenance, and provides actionable insights via intuitive dashboards for engineers.

Ergebnisse

  • 20% reduction in unplanned downtime
  • 15% slash in maintenance costs
  • £1M+ annual savings per site
  • 10,000 pieces of equipment monitored globally
  • 35% industry unplanned downtime addressed (Deloitte benchmark)
  • 70% preventable failures mitigated
Read case study →

Cruise (GM)

Automotive

Developing a self-driving taxi service in dense urban environments posed immense challenges for Cruise. Complex scenarios like unpredictable pedestrians, erratic cyclists, construction zones, and adverse weather demanded near-perfect perception and decision-making in real-time. Safety was paramount, as any failure could result in accidents, regulatory scrutiny, or public backlash. Early testing revealed gaps in handling edge cases, such as emergency vehicles or occluded objects, requiring robust AI to exceed human driver performance. A pivotal safety incident in October 2023 amplified these issues: a Cruise vehicle struck a pedestrian pushed into its path by a hit-and-run driver, then dragged her while fleeing the scene, leading to suspension of operations nationwide. This exposed vulnerabilities in post-collision behavior, sensor fusion under chaos, and regulatory compliance. Scaling to commercial robotaxi fleets while achieving zero at-fault incidents proved elusive amid $10B+ investments from GM.

Lösung

Cruise addressed these with an integrated AI stack leveraging computer vision for perception and reinforcement learning for planning. Lidar, radar, and 30+ cameras fed into CNNs and transformers for object detection, semantic segmentation, and scene prediction, processing 360° views at high fidelity even in low light or rain. Reinforcement learning optimized trajectory planning and behavioral decisions, trained on millions of simulated miles to handle rare events. End-to-end neural networks refined motion forecasting, while simulation frameworks accelerated iteration without real-world risk. Post-incident, Cruise enhanced safety protocols, resuming supervised testing in 2024 with improved disengagement rates. GM's pivot integrated this tech into Super Cruise evolution for personal vehicles.

Ergebnisse

  • 1,000,000+ miles driven fully autonomously by 2023
  • 5 million driverless miles used for AI model training
  • $10B+ cumulative investment by GM in Cruise (2016-2024)
  • 30,000+ miles per intervention in early unsupervised tests
  • Operations suspended Oct 2023; resumed supervised May 2024
  • Zero commercial robotaxi revenue; pivoted Dec 2024
Read case study →

Mass General Brigham

Healthcare

Mass General Brigham, one of the largest healthcare systems in the U.S., faced a deluge of medical imaging data from radiology, pathology, and surgical procedures. With millions of scans annually across its 12 hospitals, clinicians struggled with analysis overload, leading to delays in diagnosis and increased burnout rates among radiologists and surgeons. The need for precise, rapid interpretation was critical, as manual reviews limited throughput and risked errors in complex cases like tumor detection or surgical risk assessment. Additionally, operative workflows required better predictive tools. Surgeons needed models to forecast complications, optimize scheduling, and personalize interventions, but fragmented data silos and regulatory hurdles impeded progress. Staff shortages exacerbated these issues, demanding decision support systems to alleviate cognitive load and improve patient outcomes.

Lösung

To address these, Mass General Brigham established a dedicated Artificial Intelligence Center, centralizing research, development, and deployment of hundreds of AI models focused on computer vision for imaging and predictive analytics for surgery. This enterprise-wide initiative integrates ML into clinical workflows, partnering with tech giants like Microsoft for foundation models in medical imaging. Key solutions include deep learning algorithms for automated anomaly detection in X-rays, MRIs, and CTs, reducing radiologist review time. For surgery, predictive models analyze patient data to predict post-op risks, enhancing planning. Robust governance frameworks ensure ethical deployment, addressing bias and explainability.

Ergebnisse

  • $30 million AI investment fund established
  • Hundreds of AI models managed for radiology and pathology
  • Improved diagnostic throughput via AI-assisted radiology
  • AI foundation models developed through Microsoft partnership
  • Initiatives for AI governance in medical imaging deployed
  • Reduced clinician workload and burnout through decision support
Read case study →

BP

Energy

BP, a global energy leader in oil, gas, and renewables, grappled with high energy costs during peak periods across its extensive assets. Volatile grid demands and price spikes during high-consumption times strained operations, exacerbating inefficiencies in energy production and consumption. Integrating intermittent renewable sources added forecasting challenges, while traditional management failed to dynamically respond to real-time market signals, leading to substantial financial losses and grid instability risks . Compounding this, BP's diverse portfolio—from offshore platforms to data-heavy exploration—faced data silos and legacy systems ill-equipped for predictive analytics. Peak energy expenses not only eroded margins but hindered the transition to sustainable operations amid rising regulatory pressures for emissions reduction. The company needed a solution to shift loads intelligently and monetize flexibility in energy markets .

Lösung

To tackle these issues, BP acquired Open Energi in 2021, gaining access to its flagship Plato AI platform, which employs machine learning for predictive analytics and real-time optimization. Plato analyzes vast datasets from assets, weather, and grid signals to forecast peaks and automate demand response, shifting non-critical loads to off-peak times while participating in frequency response services . Integrated into BP's operations, the AI enables dynamic containment and flexibility markets, optimizing consumption without disrupting production. Combined with BP's internal AI for exploration and simulation, it provides end-to-end visibility, reducing reliance on fossil fuels during peaks and enhancing renewable integration . This acquisition marked a strategic pivot, blending Open Energi's demand-side expertise with BP's supply-side scale.

Ergebnisse

  • $10 million in annual energy savings
  • 80+ MW of energy assets under flexible management
  • Strongest oil exploration performance in years via AI
  • Material boost in electricity demand optimization
  • Reduced peak grid costs through dynamic response
  • Enhanced asset efficiency across oil, gas, renewables
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Start With One High-Volume After-Hours Use Case

Instead of trying to automate every type of request, start by identifying one or two high-volume, low-risk intents that appear frequently outside business hours. Typical examples: “Where is my order?”, “I can’t log in”, or “How do I change my appointment?” Export recent after-hours chats/emails and cluster them into themes to choose your first targets.

Once selected, design conversation flows where Gemini can resolve the issue end-to-end. For order status, this means guiding the customer to identify themselves and their order, calling your order management API, and presenting a clear answer along with next-step options (e.g. “notify me when it ships”). This focus keeps scope tight and accelerates time-to-value.

Configure Gemini to Use Your Knowledge and Policies Reliably

To avoid hallucinations and policy conflicts, connect Gemini to your curated knowledge rather than letting it improvise. Centralise your FAQs, policy documents, and troubleshooting trees in a repository that Gemini can access via retrieval. Structure content with clear titles, tags (product, region, language), and updated dates so the model can pick the most relevant information.

Use a system prompt (or equivalent configuration) that instructs Gemini to base answers only on approved sources and to surface links or references when possible. For example:

System instruction for Gemini customer support assistant:

You are a customer service virtual agent for <Company>.

Always follow these rules:
- Answer ONLY using the official knowledge base, policy docs, and FAQs provided.
- If information is missing or unclear, say you don't know and offer to create a ticket.
- Never invent order details, prices, or policy exceptions.
- For region-specific rules, always check the customer's country field.
- For security-sensitive actions, explain the process and hand off to a human agent.

This configuration drastically reduces inconsistent replies and makes the assistant behave more like a well-trained first-line agent.

Integrate Gemini With Your CRM and Ticketing System

To move beyond generic answers, connect Gemini to your CRM and ticketing tools via API. Define a small set of supported actions first, such as: create a new ticket, add a note, update contact info, or fetch a case history summary. Wrap these actions in clear API endpoints with strict permissions and logging.

In your orchestration layer, constrain when Gemini can call which action. For example, only allow ticket creation after the customer’s email has been verified; only allow data changes on authenticated sessions. A typical pattern looks like:

Example workflow for "create ticket" action:
1. Gemini detects that the issue cannot be resolved in self-service.
2. Gemini confirms the customer's identity (email + security question).
3. Gemini summarizes the conversation in 2-3 bullet points.
4. Orchestration layer calls Ticketing API with:
   - Customer ID
   - Issue summary and transcript
   - Priority hint (derived from sentiment/keywords)
5. Gemini returns a human-readable confirmation with the ticket ID.

This ensures overnight conversations don’t vanish: they reappear as structured, ready-to-work tickets for your morning team.

Implement Smart Escalation and Handover Rules

24/7 automation is only safe if customers can reach a human when needed. Configure clear escalation triggers for Gemini: repeated expressions of frustration, mentions of legal or safety issues, VIP accounts, or topics outside defined scope. When a trigger fires, Gemini should stop trying to “fix” the issue and instead focus on capturing context and expectations for the human handover.

Design the handover content to be immediately useful for agents. For example:

Escalation note template generated by Gemini:

- Customer: <Name, ID, Segment>
- Channel: Web chat (time: <timestamp>)
- Detected intent: Billing dispute - double charge
- Customer goal in their own words: "I was charged twice..."
- Steps already taken by the assistant: <short list>
- Suggested next action: Call back within 4 business hours; needs human review.

When agents start their day, they see a prioritised queue of such cases instead of raw, unstructured chat transcripts, cutting their morning handle time significantly.

Use Gemini to Summarise and Label Overnight Conversations

Even when issues can’t be resolved fully at night, Gemini can still prepare your team for a smoother morning. Configure it to summarise each overnight conversation, label the intent, detect sentiment, and tag urgency. Store these summaries and labels in your CRM or ticketing system.

This can be orchestrated in batch as well: for channels Gemini doesn’t yet respond on (e.g. emails received overnight), run a scheduled process where Gemini analyses the inbox, clusters similar issues, and suggests bulk responses where appropriate. Example prompt for summarisation:

You are assisting the morning support team.

For each conversation, produce:
- 1-sentence summary
- Intent label (from this list: <list>)
- Sentiment (positive/neutral/negative)
- Urgency (low/medium/high)
- Whether a human follow-up is required (yes/no)

This makes 08:00 feel like 10:30 in terms of readiness: your team starts with clarity, not chaos.

Continuously Retrain Prompts and Flows From Real Data

Don’t treat your initial Gemini configuration as finished. Set up a recurring review (e.g. every 2–4 weeks) where you analyse a sample of overnight conversations, identify failure modes, and adjust prompts, routing rules, and knowledge content. Capture patterns such as “customers asking for things we don’t yet support via automation” or “topics that always end in human escalation.”

Translate these findings into concrete improvements: new intents, updated system instructions, expanded API actions, or better FAQ entries. Over time, your 24/7 customer service automation will handle a growing share of volume with higher accuracy, while your humans see fewer trivial cases. A realistic goal for many teams is to automate 25–40% of after-hours contacts within the first 3–6 months.

Implemented thoughtfully, these practices can lead to measurable outcomes: 20–50% reduction in overnight backlog, 30–60% faster first response times for global customers, and a noticeable drop in morning peak pressure on agents — all without adding permanent night and weekend headcount.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini is well-suited for repetitive, structured requests that follow clear rules. Typical examples include order or booking status checks, basic account information queries, password and access guidance, simple billing questions, appointment changes, and first-line troubleshooting with decision trees.

As long as you can document the required steps and, where needed, expose them via API, Gemini can automate a large share of these 24/7. For complex, ambiguous, or high-risk topics (legal disputes, complaints about harm, large B2B contracts), we recommend using Gemini for triage and summarisation, then routing to a human.

For a focused initial use case (e.g. order status and basic FAQs), many organisations can get a first working prototype in a few weeks if systems and knowledge are accessible. The critical path is usually not the AI itself, but aligning stakeholders, preparing knowledge, and setting up secure APIs.

Reruption’s AI PoC approach is designed for this: in a short, time-boxed engagement we define scope, build a Gemini-based prototype, connect it to a limited set of back-end systems, and measure performance. After that, production hardening, rollout, and expansion to additional intents typically takes another 4–12 weeks depending on complexity and IT processes.

You don’t need a large data science team, but you do need a few core roles. On the business side: a customer service lead who owns use cases and KPIs, and a content owner for knowledge and policies. On the technical side: an engineer or IT contact who can expose APIs securely and integrate Gemini with your CRM/ticketing systems.

Reruption typically augments these teams with our own AI engineers and product-minded experts who handle prompt design, orchestration logic, and experiment setup. Over time, we help your internal team build the capability to maintain and extend the assistant without depending on external vendors for every small change.

The main cost drivers are integration work, conversation design, and change management; the incremental cost of running Gemini interactions is relatively low compared to human labor. ROI comes from reduced need for night/weekend staffing, lower overtime, reduced morning backlog, and less churn from poor after-hours experiences.

For many teams, automating even 20–30% of after-hours volume can offset implementation costs within months. During a PoC or early rollout, we recommend tracking avoided tickets, average handling time savings in the first morning hours, and customer satisfaction by time zone to build a concrete business case rather than a theoretical one.

Reruption combines strategic clarity with deep engineering to move from idea to a working Gemini-based support assistant quickly. Through our 9.900€ AI PoC offering, we define your highest-impact after-hours use cases, validate technical feasibility, and build a functioning prototype that integrates with your real systems.

With our Co-Preneur approach, we don’t just advise from the sidelines: we embed with your team, help design conversation flows, set up secure integrations, and define KPIs and governance. Once the PoC proves value, we support you in scaling to production, expanding to additional intents, and enabling your team to operate and evolve the solution independently.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media