The Challenge: Unqualified Lead Focus

Most sales organisations don’t fail because of a lack of leads, but because reps spend too much time on the wrong ones. Without clear visibility into purchase intent and winnability, deals look similar in the CRM. Reps chase whoever replied last, opened an email, or booked a meeting — even if the underlying fit, urgency, or budget was never there.

Traditional approaches like static lead scoring models, rigid qualification checklists, or gut-feel prioritisation simply don’t keep up with modern buying behaviour. Scoring rules are rarely updated, sales and marketing data sit in silos, and manual qualification notes get buried in call logs and email threads. As a result, a lead that just clicked a generic ad may be treated nearly the same as a stakeholder who has engaged deeply across multiple touchpoints.

The business impact is significant: slow response to hot prospects, bloated pipelines full of zombie deals, and lower revenue per rep. Managers struggle to forecast accurately because the pipeline is noisy. Marketing keeps pumping in volume without a clear feedback loop on which campaigns actually produce qualified opportunities. Over time, competitors who use data and AI to focus effort on truly winnable deals start to close faster and at better margins.

This challenge is real, but it’s also very solvable. With today’s AI, you can analyse conversations, emails, and deal history at scale to understand what a winnable opportunity actually looks like in your context — and then operationalise it. At Reruption, we’ve helped teams replace manual, subjective qualification with AI-driven decision support. In the rest of this page, you’ll see how to use Gemini to clean up your pipeline, protect your reps’ time, and systematically improve deal conversion.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From our work building AI solutions for sales and commercial teams, we see a clear pattern: the biggest uplift in win rates comes not from more leads, but from better focus. Google’s Gemini, when connected to your CRM, Google Workspace, and ad platforms, is well suited to tackle the unqualified lead problem because it can reason across emails, meetings, campaigns, and deal outcomes — and then recommend concrete qualification rules and lead scoring models tailored to your pipeline. With Reruption’s hands-on implementation experience, Gemini becomes a practical engine to reallocate sales effort toward deals you can actually win.

Start with a Clear Definition of a “Good” Deal

Before you connect Gemini to every tool in your stack, get explicit about what a qualified, high-quality opportunity looks like in your business. This is not just BANT on a slide; it’s the specific patterns you see in won deals: typical company profiles, buying roles involved, activities before the first call, deal cycle length, and common objections that still lead to wins.

Strategically, this gives Gemini a target. When you later ask Gemini to analyse historical opportunities, it can contrast your definition against real data instead of making generic assumptions. In workshops, we often have sales, marketing, and customer success jointly define these criteria, which also surfaces misalignment that previously led to unqualified leads being pushed into the pipeline.

Connect Sales, Marketing, and Product Signals Before You Optimise

Unqualified lead focus is rarely just a sales problem; it’s a systems problem. Reps chase bad leads because marketing signals, product usage data, and CRM fields are fragmented. Strategically, you want Gemini to see the full picture: where a lead came from, how they engaged with content, who attended calls, and what happened after closing.

That means involving marketing ops and sales ops early to map out which tools feed the pipeline. Connect Gemini to key sources (CRM, Google Workspace, ad platforms, web analytics) so it can detect patterns like “leads from Campaign X that never reach stage 3” or “product trial sign-ups that convert at 5x the average.” The mindset shift: treat Gemini as a cross-functional analysis layer, not just another sales add-on.

Use Gemini as a Recommendation Engine, Not an Autopilot

From a risk perspective, it’s tempting to let an AI assign lead scores and automatically route deals. But if you jump straight to full automation, you risk reinforcing existing biases or overreacting to outliers in the data. Strategically, treat Gemini as a recommendation engine first: it surfaces suggested scores, next best actions, and disqualification reasons, while reps and managers remain in control.

This approach builds trust and gives you time to calibrate models. Managers can review where reps override Gemini’s suggestions and use that feedback to refine qualification rules. Over a few cycles, you’ll know which recommendations are reliable enough to automate and which should remain human-reviewed.

Align Incentives Around Lead Quality, Not Just Volume

Even the best AI-driven lead scoring will fail if your commercial incentives still reward volume over qualified pipeline. Strategically, you should update KPIs and compensation models to reinforce the new reality: it’s better for reps to close fewer, better deals than to carry a bloated pipeline of low-intent leads.

For example, you might track metrics like “percentage of opportunities with Gemini score ≥ X” or “win rate for Gemini-recommended deals” and reflect these in team goals. Marketing can be measured on pipeline quality by Gemini’s qualification score rather than raw MQL counts. This alignment ensures Gemini’s insights actually change behaviour instead of becoming another ignored dashboard.

Invest in Data Hygiene and Governance from Day One

Gemini is only as good as the data it sees. If deal stages are inconsistent, contact roles are missing, or activities are not logged, you will get noisy and sometimes misleading recommendations. Strategically, that means pairing your Gemini initiative with a push on data hygiene, data ownership, and governance.

Define who is accountable for critical fields, which behaviours are mandatory (e.g. logging meeting outcomes), and how often scoring models are reviewed. From a compliance perspective, ensure you have clear policies on what customer data Gemini can access, how long it is retained, and how outputs are audited. This reduces risk and increases the credibility of AI-driven qualification in the eyes of sales leadership.

Used thoughtfully, Gemini becomes much more than a clever chatbot; it’s a way to systematically cut unqualified lead focus and direct your sales effort toward the opportunities you can realistically win. By combining your historical deal data, everyday conversations in Google Workspace, and campaign performance, it can recommend practical qualification rules and scoring models that reflect how your pipeline really works. At Reruption, we specialise in turning these ideas into working AI products inside your organisation — from first PoC to rollout — so if you’re ready to clean up your pipeline and improve conversion with Gemini, we’re happy to explore what that would look like in your context.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Energy to Banking: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Shell

Energy

Unplanned equipment failures in refineries and offshore oil rigs plagued Shell, causing significant downtime, safety incidents, and costly repairs that eroded profitability in a capital-intensive industry. According to a Deloitte 2024 report, 35% of refinery downtime is unplanned, with 70% preventable via advanced analytics—highlighting the gap in traditional scheduled maintenance approaches that missed subtle failure precursors in assets like pumps, valves, and compressors. Shell's vast global operations amplified these issues, generating terabytes of sensor data from thousands of assets that went underutilized due to data silos, legacy systems, and manual analysis limitations. Failures could cost millions per hour, risking environmental spills and personnel safety while pressuring margins amid volatile energy markets.

Lösung

Shell partnered with C3 AI to implement an AI-powered predictive maintenance platform, leveraging machine learning models trained on real-time IoT sensor data, maintenance histories, and operational metrics to forecast failures and optimize interventions. Integrated with Microsoft Azure Machine Learning, the solution detects anomalies, predicts remaining useful life (RUL), and prioritizes high-risk assets across upstream oil rigs and downstream refineries. The scalable C3 AI platform enabled rapid deployment, starting with pilots on critical equipment and expanding globally. It automates predictive analytics, shifting from reactive to proactive maintenance, and provides actionable insights via intuitive dashboards for engineers.

Ergebnisse

  • 20% reduction in unplanned downtime
  • 15% slash in maintenance costs
  • £1M+ annual savings per site
  • 10,000 pieces of equipment monitored globally
  • 35% industry unplanned downtime addressed (Deloitte benchmark)
  • 70% preventable failures mitigated
Read case study →

Goldman Sachs

Investment Banking

In the fast-paced investment banking sector, Goldman Sachs employees grapple with overwhelming volumes of repetitive tasks. Daily routines like processing hundreds of emails, writing and debugging complex financial code, and poring over lengthy documents for insights consume up to 40% of work time, diverting focus from high-value activities like client advisory and deal-making. Regulatory constraints exacerbate these issues, as sensitive financial data demands ironclad security, limiting off-the-shelf AI use. Traditional tools fail to scale with the need for rapid, accurate analysis amid market volatility, risking delays in response times and competitive edge.

Lösung

Goldman Sachs countered with a proprietary generative AI assistant, fine-tuned on internal datasets in a secure, private environment. This tool summarizes emails by extracting action items and priorities, generates production-ready code for models like risk assessments, and analyzes documents to highlight key trends and anomalies. Built from early 2023 proofs-of-concept, it leverages custom LLMs to ensure compliance and accuracy, enabling natural language interactions without external data risks. The firm prioritized employee augmentation over replacement, training staff for optimal use.

Ergebnisse

  • Rollout Scale: 10,000 employees in 2024
  • Timeline: PoCs 2023; initial rollout 2024; firmwide 2025
  • Productivity Boost: Routine tasks streamlined, est. 25-40% time savings on emails/coding/docs
  • Adoption: Rapid uptake across tech and front-office teams
  • Strategic Impact: Core to 10-year AI playbook for structural gains
Read case study →

Airbus

Aerospace

In aircraft design, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are essential for predicting airflow around wings, fuselages, and novel configurations critical to fuel efficiency and emissions reduction. However, traditional high-fidelity RANS solvers require hours to days per run on supercomputers, limiting engineers to just a few dozen iterations per design cycle and stifling innovation for next-gen hydrogen-powered aircraft like ZEROe. This computational bottleneck was particularly acute amid Airbus' push for decarbonized aviation by 2035, where complex geometries demand exhaustive exploration to optimize lift-drag ratios while minimizing weight. Collaborations with DLR and ONERA highlighted the need for faster tools, as manual tuning couldn't scale to test thousands of variants needed for laminar flow or blended-wing-body concepts.

Lösung

Machine learning surrogate models, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), were trained on vast CFD datasets to emulate full simulations in milliseconds. Airbus integrated these into a generative design pipeline, where AI predicts pressure fields, velocities, and forces, enforcing Navier-Stokes physics via hybrid loss functions for accuracy. Development involved curating millions of simulation snapshots from legacy runs, GPU-accelerated training, and iterative fine-tuning with experimental wind-tunnel data. This enabled rapid iteration: AI screens designs, high-fidelity CFD verifies top candidates, slashing overall compute by orders of magnitude while maintaining <5% error on key metrics.

Ergebnisse

  • Simulation time: 1 hour → 30 ms (120,000x speedup)
  • Design iterations: +10,000 per cycle in same timeframe
  • Prediction accuracy: 95%+ for lift/drag coefficients
  • 50% reduction in design phase timeline
  • 30-40% fewer high-fidelity CFD runs required
  • Fuel burn optimization: up to 5% improvement in predictions
Read case study →

UC San Diego Health

Healthcare

Sepsis, a life-threatening condition, poses a major threat in emergency departments, with delayed detection contributing to high mortality rates—up to 20-30% in severe cases. At UC San Diego Health, an academic medical center handling over 1 million patient visits annually, nonspecific early symptoms made timely intervention challenging, exacerbating outcomes in busy ERs . A randomized study highlighted the need for proactive tools beyond traditional scoring systems like qSOFA. Hospital capacity management and patient flow were further strained post-COVID, with bed shortages leading to prolonged admission wait times and transfer delays. Balancing elective surgeries, emergencies, and discharges required real-time visibility . Safely integrating generative AI, such as GPT-4 in Epic, risked data privacy breaches and inaccurate clinical advice . These issues demanded scalable AI solutions to predict risks, streamline operations, and responsibly adopt emerging tech without compromising care quality.

Lösung

UC San Diego Health implemented COMPOSER, a deep learning model trained on electronic health records to predict sepsis risk up to 6-12 hours early, triggering Epic Best Practice Advisory (BPA) alerts for nurses . This quasi-experimental approach across two ERs integrated seamlessly with workflows . Mission Control, an AI-powered operations command center funded by $22M, uses predictive analytics for real-time bed assignments, patient transfers, and capacity forecasting, reducing bottlenecks . Led by Chief Health AI Officer Karandeep Singh, it leverages data from Epic for holistic visibility. For generative AI, pilots with Epic's GPT-4 enable NLP queries and automated patient replies, governed by strict safety protocols to mitigate hallucinations and ensure HIPAA compliance . This multi-faceted strategy addressed detection, flow, and innovation challenges.

Ergebnisse

  • Sepsis in-hospital mortality: 17% reduction
  • Lives saved annually: 50 across two ERs
  • Sepsis bundle compliance: Significant improvement
  • 72-hour SOFA score change: Reduced deterioration
  • ICU encounters: Decreased post-implementation
  • Patient throughput: Improved via Mission Control
Read case study →

Khan Academy

Education

Khan Academy faced the monumental task of providing personalized tutoring at scale to its 100 million+ annual users, many in under-resourced areas. Traditional online courses, while effective, lacked the interactive, one-on-one guidance of human tutors, leading to high dropout rates and uneven mastery. Teachers were overwhelmed with planning, grading, and differentiation for diverse classrooms. In 2023, as AI advanced, educators grappled with hallucinations and over-reliance risks in tools like ChatGPT, which often gave direct answers instead of fostering learning. Khan Academy needed an AI that promoted step-by-step reasoning without cheating, while ensuring equitable access as a nonprofit. Scaling safely across subjects and languages posed technical and ethical hurdles.

Lösung

Khan Academy developed Khanmigo, an AI-powered tutor and teaching assistant built on GPT-4, piloted in March 2023 for teachers and expanded to students. Unlike generic chatbots, Khanmigo uses custom prompts to guide learners Socratically—prompting questions, hints, and feedback without direct answers—across math, science, humanities, and more. The nonprofit approach emphasized safety guardrails, integration with Khan's content library, and iterative improvements via teacher feedback. Partnerships like Microsoft enabled free global access for teachers by 2024, now in 34+ languages. Ongoing updates, such as 2025 math computation enhancements, address accuracy challenges.

Ergebnisse

  • User Growth: 68,000 (2023-24 pilot) to 700,000+ (2024-25 school year)
  • Teacher Adoption: Free for teachers in most countries, millions using Khan Academy tools
  • Languages Supported: 34+ for Khanmigo
  • Engagement: Improved student persistence and mastery in pilots
  • Time Savings: Teachers save hours on lesson planning and prep
  • Scale: Integrated with 429+ free courses in 43 languages
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Use Gemini to Analyse Historical Deals and Derive a Win-Likelihood Model

Start by giving Gemini access to a representative set of past opportunities (won, lost, and no decision) from your CRM, plus related emails and call notes stored in Google Workspace. The goal is to identify which attributes and behaviours actually correlate with wins in your sales process.

Export a sample of deals with fields like industry, company size, role of main contact, opportunity source, deal value, stages touched, key activities, and outcome. Then provide Gemini with that data and prompt it to detect patterns and propose a scoring framework.

Example Gemini prompt for analysis:
You are a sales analytics assistant.

I will give you a table of historical opportunities with these columns:
- Outcome (Won/Lost/No decision)
- Lead source and campaign
- Company size and industry
- Main buyer role
- Number of meetings
- Time from first contact to proposal
- Key objections mentioned
- Deal value

Tasks:
1) Identify the top 10 patterns that distinguish Won deals from Lost/No decision.
2) Propose a lead scoring model (0–100) that uses only attributes we can observe within the first 2 weeks of contact.
3) For each scoring factor, explain how strongly it correlates with wins.
4) Flag any lead sources or campaigns that systematically produce low-scoring (unqualified) deals.

Use Gemini’s output as a starting point, then iterate with your sales leaders to adjust weights and ensure the model reflects reality. This becomes the backbone of your AI-assisted lead qualification.

Embed Gemini-Powered Qualification Directly in Your CRM Workflow

Once you have a proposed scoring model, operationalise it where reps live: your CRM. Depending on your stack, you can call Gemini via API or use an integration to compute a Gemini Qualification Score and recommended next best action every time a new lead or opportunity is created.

Design a simple workflow: when a new lead enters from a form, ad platform, or manual entry, trigger Gemini with relevant data (lead source, firmographics, recent website activity, first email interaction). Gemini responds with a score, key reasons, and suggested next steps (book demo, nurture, or disqualify). Display this inside the lead record so reps can immediately see where to focus.

Example Gemini request payload (conceptual):
{
  "lead": {
    "company_size": "200-500",
    "industry": "SaaS",
    "country": "DE",
    "lead_source": "Google Ads - "AI sales assistant"",
    "pages_viewed": ["/pricing", "/case-studies"],
    "first_email_text": "We are exploring tools to improve our SDR efficiency..."
  },
  "task": "score_and_recommend"
}

The expected outcome is that reps no longer start their day by scanning a long list of new leads; instead, they prioritise those with the highest Gemini score and clear buying signals.

Let Gemini Summarise Interactions and Recommend Next Best Actions

Many deals look qualified on paper at first contact, but then stall because follow-up loses relevance. Use Gemini to continuously reassess winnability based on how the conversation evolves. Connect Gemini to call transcripts, meeting notes, and email threads in Google Workspace and have it generate concise status summaries plus next best actions.

After each key interaction, automatically send the transcript or email to Gemini and ask it to classify the opportunity risk, update the qualification view, and propose concrete steps. This helps reps handle objections better and avoid over-investing in deals where the buyer is signalling low intent.

Example Gemini prompt for next-step guidance:
You are a sales coach assistant.

Here is the latest email thread and call transcript for this opportunity.
- Summarise the buyer's situation, urgency, and main objections.
- Assess the likelihood of this deal closing in the next 60 days (High/Medium/Low) and explain why.
- Suggest the 3 most effective next actions the rep should take.
- If the deal looks low-likelihood, suggest how to gracefully downgrade or disqualify.

By standardising this practice, you reduce variance between reps and ensure that qualification is updated dynamically, not just at the first meeting.

Use Gemini to Diagnose and Clean Up Unproductive Lead Sources

Unqualified lead focus often starts with acquisition. If certain campaigns or channels consistently produce low-Gemini-score leads, your reps will always be underwater. Use Gemini to analyse performance across ad platforms, campaigns, and keywords to identify which ones send you weak opportunities.

Feed Gemini data that links lead source information to downstream outcomes (stage reached, win/loss, Gemini score). Ask it to group campaigns by quality and suggest targeting or messaging changes to raise average qualification.

Example Gemini prompt for campaign diagnostics:
You are a B2B demand generation analyst.

I will provide a dataset with:
- Campaign name and channel
- Leads generated
- Average Gemini Qualification Score (0–100)
- Opportunities created
- Wins, losses, no decisions

Tasks:
1) Cluster campaigns into High, Medium, and Low quality buckets.
2) Explain the common characteristics of Low quality campaigns.
3) Suggest concrete changes to targeting, keywords, and messaging to improve lead quality.
4) Recommend which campaigns to pause, scale, or test further.

This creates a feedback loop from sales back to marketing, so you steadily reduce the inflow of unqualified leads instead of just triaging them faster.

Standardise AI-Assisted Qualification Scripts for SDRs and AEs

To truly reduce time on bad leads, frontline reps need consistent discovery calls and emails that surface qualification signals quickly. Configure Gemini to act as a real-time qualification assistant that proposes questions, email templates, and talking points tailored to each lead’s context.

For example, reps can highlight an email in Gmail and ask Gemini to suggest a short, qualification-focused reply, or paste brief notes from a first call and ask for a structured qualification summary.

Example Gemini prompt for SDR support:
You are an SDR assistant.

Here is the inbound message and basic firmographic data.
- Draft a reply that acknowledges their context.
- Ask 3–4 targeted qualification questions about budget, decision process, and timing.
- Keep it under 140 words and in a professional but friendly tone.
- Highlight in bullet points which answers would indicate high qualification.

This reduces the cognitive load on SDRs, shortens time to qualification, and ensures that key signals are captured consistently and can be fed back into the scoring model.

Set Clear KPIs and Review Cadence for Gemini’s Impact

To keep Gemini from becoming a one-off experiment, define measurable outcomes and a review rhythm from day one. Track KPIs such as: percentage of reps using Gemini recommendations, response time to high-score leads, win rate uplift on Gemini-flagged opportunities, and reduction in time spent on low-likelihood deals.

Run monthly or quarterly review sessions where sales, marketing, and operations look at these metrics together. Have Gemini generate a brief report comparing performance before and after implementing AI-driven qualification, and use that to decide which workflows to refine or automate further.

Expected outcomes for a disciplined implementation are realistic but meaningful: a 10–25% increase in win rates on qualified opportunities, 20–40% reduction in time spent on low-intent leads, faster response times to high-intent leads by several hours, and a cleaner, more forecastable pipeline within 3–6 months.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini reduces time on unqualified leads by analysing historical deal data, emails, and call notes to understand which attributes and behaviours correlate with wins in your specific pipeline. It then applies this understanding to new leads, calculating a qualification score and recommended next steps.

Instead of reps manually scanning every new lead, Gemini highlights which opportunities are most likely to close, which should be nurtured, and which can be safely disqualified early. Over time, it also flags underperforming lead sources and campaigns, so you reduce the inflow of low-quality leads in the first place.

You typically need three capabilities: access to your CRM and marketing data, basic integration or scripting skills to connect Gemini, and sales leadership willing to refine qualification rules. A sales ops or revenue ops function is ideal to coordinate data access and workflows.

On the technical side, someone should be comfortable working with APIs or low-code automation tools to send relevant lead and opportunity data to Gemini and write outputs back into your CRM. On the business side, you need sales managers who can interpret Gemini’s recommendations, adjust thresholds, and update playbooks so reps actually act on the new scores and guidance.

If your data is reasonably clean, you can see directional insights within 2–4 weeks from the first analysis of historical deals. That’s usually enough time for Gemini to propose a first version of a lead scoring model and highlight obviously unproductive lead sources.

Measurable changes in behaviour and win rates typically appear over 8–12 weeks, as you embed Gemini into daily workflows and reps start prioritising based on AI-driven qualification. Significant improvements in pipeline quality and revenue per rep often emerge within one to two quarters, especially when marketing also adjusts acquisition based on Gemini’s feedback.

The direct cost of using Gemini itself is usually modest compared to sales headcount costs; the main investment is in initial setup, integration, and change management. Many teams start with a focused pilot on one region or segment to limit scope and validate ROI before scaling.

In terms of impact, realistic outcomes are a 10–25% uplift in win rates for qualified opportunities and a 20–40% reduction in time spent on low-intent leads. For a team of several reps, that often translates into six-figure annual gains in additional closed revenue and saved time, well exceeding the cost of implementation and ongoing usage.

Reruption supports you end to end, from idea to a working solution in your stack. We typically start with an AI PoC (9,900€) where we connect Gemini to a slice of your CRM and Google Workspace data, validate that it can reliably distinguish winnable from unwinnable deals, and prototype a scoring and recommendation model.

From there, our Co-Preneur approach means we embed with your team like co-founders: we design the workflows, build the integrations, handle security and compliance questions, and coach your sales organisation on using Gemini in daily qualification. Because we focus on AI Strategy, AI Engineering, and Enablement, you don’t get a slide deck; you get a live system that your reps can use to stop chasing bad deals and focus where it counts.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media