The Challenge: Weak Creative Performance Insight

Modern marketing teams run hundreds of ad variations across Meta, Google, TikTok, LinkedIn and more. Yet when performance drops, answering a simple question – which creative elements actually drive clicks, conversions, or ROAS? – becomes almost impossible. Data is scattered across platforms, naming conventions are inconsistent, and weekly performance reports rarely go deeper than “this campaign worked, this one didn’t.”

Traditional analysis methods rely on manual spreadsheet work, gut feeling in creative reviews, and one-off deep dives when something is on fire. Analysts manually tag creatives, export CSVs, build pivot tables, and try to isolate variables like headline, visual style, or call-to-action. By the time patterns emerge, the campaign is often over, budgets have shifted, and the opportunity to iterate quickly has been lost. The result is a constant lag between what happens in the market and how your creative strategy responds.

The business impact is substantial. Without clear creative performance insight, brands over-invest in underperforming angles, miss out on scaling winners early, and waste hours each week on low-value reporting. Cost per acquisition creeps up, experimentation slows down, and marketing teams struggle to justify spend in conversations with finance. Over time, this erodes competitive advantage: faster, more data-driven competitors simply learn quicker which creative stories convert and outbid you in the auction.

This challenge is real, but it is solvable. With the latest generation of AI models like Claude, it’s now possible to ingest messy ad exports and transform them into structured, nuanced insight about what truly drives ROAS. At Reruption, we’ve built AI-powered analysis and decision-support tools inside organizations facing similar complexity. The rest of this page walks through practical ways to use Claude to move from noisy dashboards to clear creative hypotheses – and how to set this up so it actually sticks in your marketing workflow.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI-first analytics and decision tools, we’ve seen that the real unlock is not "more data" but better questions and structure. Claude is particularly strong at long-form reasoning over messy inputs – exactly what you need to make sense of raw ad exports, creative briefs, and fragmented dashboards. Used well, Claude can become a creative insight copilot that helps your marketing team see patterns, form hypotheses, and prioritize testing, instead of drowning in spreadsheets.

Think in Creative Hypotheses, Not Just Metrics

Most marketing teams think in terms of surface metrics: CTR, CPC, conversion rate, ROAS. Those are crucial, but they don’t explain why a creative works. To get value from Claude for ad performance optimization, you need to frame the problem as a set of hypotheses: “Is urgency-based messaging outperforming aspirational messaging?” “Do product-centric visuals beat lifestyle shots on retargeting?” Claude is very good at ingesting data and narrative context, then suggesting nuanced hypotheses you can test.

Before you upload any data, write down the 3–5 questions you want Claude to answer about your creatives. Combine quantitative objectives (e.g. lower CPA) with qualitative angles (e.g. emotional tone, problem/solution framing, benefit hierarchy). This mindset shift turns Claude from a glorified reporting tool into a strategic creative insight partner your team can use in ongoing campaign planning.

Design a Minimal but Robust Data Structure

Claude handles unstructured text very well, but for systematic creative performance insight you still need a minimal structure: consistent naming for campaigns, ad sets, and asset variants; clear columns for spend, impressions, clicks, conversions, revenue. Without that, you’ll get interesting narratives but weak, repeatable insight. Reruption often starts projects by defining a pragmatic data schema that your team can actually maintain, instead of a theoretically perfect taxonomy that collapses after two weeks.

Strategically, this also means aligning marketing, analytics, and sometimes finance on what “good performance” means. If your BI team uses contribution margin while your marketers optimize for ROAS, Claude will surface conflicting signals. A shared metric layer – even if simple at first – lets you use Claude to prioritize creative directions in a way the whole organization can trust.

Prepare Your Team for an AI-Augmented Workflow

Introducing Claude into creative performance analysis is not just a tooling change; it’s a workflow and culture shift. Creative, performance marketing, and analytics teams need to understand where AI-driven insights fit into existing rituals like weekly performance calls, creative reviews, and sprint planning. If Claude’s recommendations live in a parallel universe, they’ll be ignored after the initial novelty wears off.

We recommend defining explicit touchpoints: for example, “Every Monday, Claude summarizes last week’s performance and proposes 3 new creative hypotheses,” or “Before new campaigns go live, Claude reviews the brief against past performance patterns.” This makes the AI visible and useful, rather than a side experiment only one analyst cares about.

Mitigate Risk with Guardrails and Human Oversight

Claude is powerful but not infallible. It can misinterpret spurious correlations or overfit to a limited sample of campaigns. Strategically, you need clear guardrails: Claude should suggest patterns and hypotheses, not autonomously switch off your top-performing campaigns or reallocate budgets without human review. Pair its qualitative pattern recognition with your existing quantitative checks in tools like Google Ads, Meta Ads Manager, or your BI stack.

At Reruption, we design workflows where Claude’s output feeds into a human decision step. For example, Claude might propose that “short benefit-led headlines with product imagery” outperform others. A performance marketer then validates this against native platform reports, sanity-checks the sample size, and turns the insight into a structured A/B test plan. This keeps risk low while still accelerating learning.

Start with a Focused Pilot Before Scaling Across Channels

It’s tempting to throw all your Meta, Google, TikTok, and programmatic data at Claude from day one. In practice, this leads to confusion and over-engineering. A better strategic path is to pick one channel and one core objective – e.g. Meta prospecting for new customer acquisition – and pilot Claude as your “creative insights analyst” there. Once the workflow is proven and your team trusts the output, expand step by step.

This pilot-first approach aligns with Reruption’s AI PoC philosophy: validate that AI-driven creative analysis delivers real lift (e.g. lower CPA, higher ROAS, faster creative iteration) in a contained environment. Then, invest in automation, integrations, and process changes to scale it. You de-risk the initiative while still moving faster than traditional consulting or BI projects.

Used with the right structure and mindset, Claude can transform weak creative performance insight into a repeatable advantage: clearer patterns, sharper hypotheses, and faster creative iteration that shows up in ROAS. Reruption combines this tool with deep engineering and workflow design experience to embed AI-driven creative analysis directly into your marketing routines, not just in a slide deck. If you want to explore a focused pilot or turn your existing exports into actionable insight, we’re happy to discuss how our AI PoC and Co-Preneur approach could fit your specific setup.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Payments to Energy: Learn how companies successfully use Claude.

Visa

Payments

The payments industry faced a surge in online fraud, particularly enumeration attacks where threat actors use automated scripts and botnets to test stolen card details at scale. These attacks exploit vulnerabilities in card-not-present transactions, causing $1.1 billion in annual fraud losses globally and significant operational expenses for issuers. Visa needed real-time detection to combat this without generating high false positives that block legitimate customers, especially amid rising e-commerce volumes like Cyber Monday spikes. Traditional fraud systems struggled with the speed and sophistication of these attacks, amplified by AI-driven bots. Visa's challenge was to analyze vast transaction data in milliseconds, identifying anomalous patterns while maintaining seamless user experiences. This required advanced AI and machine learning to predict and score risks accurately.

Lösung

Visa developed the Visa Account Attack Intelligence (VAAI) Score, a generative AI-powered tool that scores the likelihood of enumeration attacks in real-time for card-not-present transactions. By leveraging generative AI components alongside machine learning models, VAAI detects sophisticated patterns from botnets and scripts that evade legacy rules-based systems. Integrated into Visa's broader AI-driven fraud ecosystem, including Identity Behavior Analysis, the solution enhances risk scoring with behavioral insights. Rolled out first to U.S. issuers in 2024, it reduces both fraud and false declines, optimizing operations. This approach allows issuers to proactively mitigate threats at unprecedented scale.

Ergebnisse

  • $40 billion in fraud prevented (Oct 2022-Sep 2023)
  • Nearly 2x increase YoY in fraud prevention
  • $1.1 billion annual global losses from enumeration attacks targeted
  • 85% more fraudulent transactions blocked on Cyber Monday 2024 YoY
  • Handled 200% spike in fraud attempts without service disruption
  • Enhanced risk scoring accuracy via ML and Identity Behavior Analysis
Read case study →

Tesla, Inc.

Automotive

The automotive industry faces a staggering 94% of traffic accidents attributed to human error, including distraction, fatigue, and poor judgment, resulting in over 1.3 million global road deaths annually. In the US alone, NHTSA data shows an average of one crash per 670,000 miles driven, highlighting the urgent need for advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) to enhance safety and reduce fatalities. Tesla encountered specific hurdles in scaling vision-only autonomy, ditching radar and lidar for camera-based systems reliant on AI to mimic human perception. Challenges included variable AI performance in diverse conditions like fog, night, or construction zones, regulatory scrutiny over misleading Level 2 labeling despite Level 4-like demos, and ensuring robust driver monitoring to prevent over-reliance. Past incidents and studies criticized inconsistent computer vision reliability.

Lösung

Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) Supervised leverage end-to-end deep learning neural networks trained on billions of real-world miles, processing camera feeds for perception, prediction, and control without modular rules. Transitioning from HydraNet (multi-task learning for 30+ outputs) to pure end-to-end models, FSD v14 achieves door-to-door driving via video-based imitation learning. Overcoming challenges, Tesla scaled data collection from its fleet of 6M+ vehicles, using Dojo supercomputers for training on petabytes of video. Vision-only approach cuts costs vs. lidar rivals, with recent upgrades like new cameras addressing edge cases. Regulatory pushes target unsupervised FSD by end-2025, with China approval eyed for 2026.

Ergebnisse

  • Autopilot Crash Rate: 1 per 6.36M miles (Q3 2025)
  • Safety Multiple: 9x safer than US average (670K miles/crash)
  • Fleet Data: Billions of miles for training
  • FSD v14: Door-to-door autonomy achieved
  • Q2 2025: 1 crash per 6.69M miles
  • 2024 Q4 Record: 5.94M miles between accidents
Read case study →

Stanford Health Care

Healthcare

Stanford Health Care, a leading academic medical center, faced escalating clinician burnout from overwhelming administrative tasks, including drafting patient correspondence and managing inboxes overloaded with messages. With vast EHR data volumes, extracting insights for precision medicine and real-time patient monitoring was manual and time-intensive, delaying care and increasing error risks. Traditional workflows struggled with predictive analytics for events like sepsis or falls, and computer vision for imaging analysis, amid growing patient volumes. Clinicians spent excessive time on routine communications, such as lab result notifications, hindering focus on complex diagnostics. The need for scalable, unbiased AI algorithms was critical to leverage extensive datasets for better outcomes.

Lösung

Partnering with Microsoft, Stanford became one of the first healthcare systems to pilot Azure OpenAI Service within Epic EHR, enabling generative AI for drafting patient messages and natural language queries on clinical data. This integration used GPT-4 to automate correspondence, reducing manual effort. Complementing this, the Healthcare AI Applied Research Team deployed machine learning for predictive analytics (e.g., sepsis, falls prediction) and explored computer vision in imaging projects. Tools like ChatEHR allow conversational access to patient records, accelerating chart reviews. Phased pilots addressed data privacy and bias, ensuring explainable AI for clinicians.

Ergebnisse

  • 50% reduction in time for drafting patient correspondence
  • 30% decrease in clinician inbox burden from AI message routing
  • 91% accuracy in predictive models for inpatient adverse events
  • 20% faster lab result communication to patients
  • Improved autoimmune detection by 1 year prior to diagnosis
Read case study →

Mayo Clinic

Healthcare

As a leading academic medical center, Mayo Clinic manages millions of patient records annually, but early detection of heart failure remains elusive. Traditional echocardiography detects low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) only when symptomatic, missing asymptomatic cases that account for up to 50% of heart failure risks. Clinicians struggle with vast unstructured data, slowing retrieval of patient-specific insights and delaying decisions in high-stakes cardiology. Additionally, workforce shortages and rising costs exacerbate challenges, with cardiovascular diseases causing 17.9M deaths yearly globally. Manual ECG interpretation misses subtle patterns predictive of low EF, and sifting through electronic health records (EHRs) takes hours, hindering personalized medicine. Mayo needed scalable AI to transform reactive care into proactive prediction.

Lösung

Mayo Clinic deployed a deep learning ECG algorithm trained on over 1 million ECGs, identifying low LVEF from routine 10-second traces with high accuracy. This ML model extracts features invisible to humans, validated internally and externally. In parallel, a generative AI search tool via Google Cloud partnership accelerates EHR queries. Launched in 2023, it uses large language models (LLMs) for natural language searches, surfacing clinical insights instantly. Integrated into Mayo Clinic Platform, it supports 200+ AI initiatives. These solutions overcome data silos through federated learning and secure cloud infrastructure.

Ergebnisse

  • ECG AI AUC: 0.93 (internal), 0.92 (external validation)
  • Low EF detection sensitivity: 82% at 90% specificity
  • Asymptomatic low EF identified: 1.5% prevalence in screened population
  • GenAI search speed: 40% reduction in query time for clinicians
  • Model trained on: 1.1M ECGs from 44K patients
  • Deployment reach: Integrated in Mayo cardiology workflows since 2021
Read case study →

Associated Press (AP)

News Media

In the mid-2010s, the Associated Press (AP) faced significant constraints in its business newsroom due to limited manual resources. With only a handful of journalists dedicated to earnings coverage, AP could produce just around 300 quarterly earnings reports per quarter, primarily focusing on major S&P 500 companies. This manual process was labor-intensive: reporters had to extract data from financial filings, analyze key metrics like revenue, profits, and growth rates, and craft concise narratives under tight deadlines. As the number of publicly traded companies grew, AP struggled to cover smaller firms, leaving vast amounts of market-relevant information unreported. This limitation not only reduced AP's comprehensive market coverage but also tied up journalists on rote tasks, preventing them from pursuing investigative stories or deeper analysis. The pressure of quarterly earnings seasons amplified these issues, with deadlines coinciding across thousands of companies, making scalable reporting impossible without innovation.

Lösung

To address this, AP partnered with Automated Insights in 2014, implementing their Wordsmith NLG platform. Wordsmith uses templated algorithms to transform structured financial data—such as earnings per share, revenue figures, and year-over-year changes—into readable, journalistic prose. Reporters input verified data from sources like Zacks Investment Research, and the AI generates draft stories in seconds, which humans then lightly edit for accuracy and style. The solution involved creating custom NLG templates tailored to AP's style, ensuring stories sounded human-written while adhering to journalistic standards. This hybrid approach—AI for volume, humans for oversight—overcame quality concerns. By 2015, AP announced it would automate the majority of U.S. corporate earnings stories, scaling coverage dramatically without proportional staff increases.

Ergebnisse

  • 14x increase in quarterly earnings stories: 300 to 4,200
  • Coverage expanded to 4,000+ U.S. public companies per quarter
  • Equivalent to freeing time of 20 full-time reporters
  • Stories published in seconds vs. hours manually
  • Zero reported errors in automated stories post-implementation
  • Sustained use expanded to sports, weather, and lottery reports
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Standardize Your Ad Export and Brief Format for Claude

Claude delivers the best insights when it sees consistent, well-labeled data. Before every analysis session, export your ad performance data (from Meta, Google, etc.) into a structured CSV or Excel and make sure key columns are present: campaign, ad set, ad name, creative text, image/video description or ALT text, spend, impressions, clicks, conversions, revenue/ROAS.

In parallel, align your creative briefs in a standard template (objective, target audience, main message, emotional tone, key benefits, offer). When you share both the export and the brief with Claude, it can connect the intent of the creative with its actual performance, producing deeper insights than metrics-only analysis.

Example prompt to Claude:
You are an AI marketing analyst helping us understand which ad creatives drive ROAS.

Inputs:
1) Ad performance export (CSV pasted below)
2) Creative brief template and a few real examples

Tasks:
- Identify performance patterns across headlines, body copy, visual descriptions, and CTAs.
- Highlight 3–5 creative angles that consistently outperform others.
- Highlight 3–5 angles that consistently underperform.
- Propose 5 concrete hypotheses we should test next week.
- Present results in a structured table with columns: Angle, Evidence, Channels, Suggested Next Test.

Expected outcome: Claude produces an insight report that your performance marketer can quickly review and turn into a prioritized test plan, cutting manual analysis time by several hours per week.

Tag and Decompose Creatives into Testable Elements

To move beyond “this ad works” toward actionable creative insight, you need to break each ad into components: value proposition, emotional tone, offer type, format, CTA style, and visual concept. You can either do this manually or let Claude propose tags based on your raw ad text and descriptions.

Start by asking Claude to generate a tagging scheme and automatically assign tags to each ad row from your export. Then, in a second step, ask it to analyze performance by tag combination.

Example prompt to Claude:
You are a creative performance analyst.
1) Define a concise tagging scheme for our ads, including:
   - Value proposition (e.g. price, quality, convenience, social proof)
   - Emotional tone (e.g. urgent, aspirational, reassuring, playful)
   - Offer type (e.g. discount, free trial, bundle, new launch)
   - Visual concept (based on descriptions in the data)
2) Apply tags to each ad row in the dataset below.
3) Then, analyze performance by tag and tag combination, focusing on ROAS and CPA.
4) Output two tables:
   - Table 1: Tags ranked by performance
   - Table 2: Best-performing tag combinations and their evidence.

Expected outcome: a clear view of which creative themes and combinations actually move your KPIs, enabling more focused ideation and scaling decisions.

Use Claude to Draft Data-Backed Creative Briefs

Once you know which angles perform, close the loop by letting Claude assist with new briefs. Instead of starting from a blank page, you can have Claude produce a data-backed brief that summarizes winning themes, audience insights, and example messages tailored to each channel.

Feed Claude your past performance analysis and ask it to generate a concise brief for the next sprint, aligned with your growth targets and budgets.

Example prompt to Claude:
You are a senior performance creative strategist.
Based on the analysis below (paste Claude's previous insight output), create a creative brief for our next campaign.

Brief should include:
- Objective and primary KPI
- Target audiences and key pain points
- 3–4 winning creative angles with supporting evidence
- Do's and don'ts for copy and visuals, based on past performance
- 5 concrete ad concepts per channel (Meta, Google Display, TikTok) with sample headlines and body copy.

Expected outcome: your creative team receives a structured, insight-based brief that translates past performance into future concepts, reducing back-and-forth and time-to-first-draft.

Automate Weekly Creative Performance Summaries

Instead of manually compiling weekly decks, you can give Claude a recurring task: ingest the latest exports and generate a standardized insight summary for your team. This doesn’t require deep integration at first – even a simple workflow where an analyst exports CSVs and pastes them into Claude on Monday morning can dramatically speed up reporting.

Define a fixed summary format that matches how your leadership and creative teams like to consume insight.

Example prompt to Claude:
You are our weekly creative insights assistant.
Using the ad performance data from last week (pasted below):
- Summarize overall performance vs. the previous 4 weeks.
- Identify top 10 winning creatives and explain WHY they worked.
- Identify top 10 underperformers and likely reasons.
- Suggest 5 concrete optimization actions for this week.
- Produce an email-ready summary with bullet points for leadership
  and a more detailed section for the performance/creative team.

Expected outcome: consistent, high-quality weekly insights in 10–15 minutes instead of hours, freeing your senior marketers to focus on decisions, not deck-building.

Turn Insights into Structured Test Plans and Naming Conventions

Insight only matters if it changes what you test next. Use Claude to convert qualitative findings into a structured A/B testing roadmap and harmonized naming conventions that make future analysis easier. This creates a virtuous cycle: better naming → better data → better insights.

Ask Claude to propose a testing backlog prioritized by expected impact and ease of implementation, plus a naming scheme that encodes key creative variables, so next month’s exports are easier to analyze.

Example prompt to Claude:
You are an experimentation lead.
Given the creative insight report below, create:
1) A prioritized test plan for the next 4 weeks, including:
   - Test name
   - Hypothesis
   - Variants to create
   - Primary KPI and guardrail metrics
2) A simple, scalable naming convention for campaigns/ad sets/ads
   that encodes: audience, offer, angle, format, and CTA.
3) A checklist for our team to follow when setting up each new test.

Expected outcome: a clear roadmap for experimentation and a consistent naming convention that makes each future Claude analysis faster and more reliable.

Expected Outcomes and Realistic Benchmarks

When implemented as part of your workflow, Claude-powered creative insight typically aims at three realistic outcomes in the first 8–12 weeks: (1) 30–50% reduction in manual analysis and reporting time for performance marketers, (2) consistently faster creative iteration cycles (e.g. from monthly to bi-weekly or weekly), and (3) measurable improvements in ROAS or CPA on key campaigns driven by better scaling of winning angles and earlier pruning of weak ones. Exact numbers will depend on your spend levels, test volume, and how tightly you integrate Claude’s recommendations into decision-making, but the pattern is clear: more learning per euro spent.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude can ingest your raw ad exports, creative text, and even high-level briefs, then decompose each ad into themes and elements such as value proposition, emotional tone, offer type, and visual concept. It then cross-references these elements with performance metrics like CTR, CPA, and ROAS to surface patterns you would struggle to see manually.

Instead of just telling you which ads worked, Claude helps explain why they worked, proposing clear hypotheses like “social proof + reassurance tone performs best on retargeting” or “short, benefit-led headlines outperform feature lists on prospecting.” This lets your team focus new creative work and budget on the angles that empirically move the needle.

You don’t need a large data science team to benefit from Claude-based creative analysis. In most organizations, the core requirements are:

  • A performance marketer or analyst who can export data from your ad platforms and understands your core KPIs.
  • Someone who can maintain basic consistency in naming conventions and brief templates.
  • Clear ownership of the workflow (e.g. “performance lead runs the weekly Claude analysis and shares insights”).

Claude handles the heavy lifting of reading raw tables, interpreting text, and suggesting patterns. Reruption can help you define the right prompts, data structure, and routines so your existing team can run this without hiring new specialists.

Time-to-impact depends on your spend level and test velocity, but many teams see qualitative improvements in clarity within the first 1–2 weeks: clearer weekly summaries, better hypotheses, and more focused briefs. Quantitative impact on ROAS and CPA usually appears over a few test cycles, typically in the 4–12 week range, as you start to scale proven angles and stop funding weak ones earlier.

The key is to treat Claude as part of your experimentation loop: analyze → hypothesize → test → analyze again. If your team is already running frequent creative tests, Claude can accelerate learning quickly. If your testing culture is still maturing, the first benefit will be structure and speed in how you prioritize what to test.

The direct cost of using Claude is relatively low compared to typical media budgets or agency retainers. The main investment is in setting up the right workflows, prompts, and data structure. ROI comes from three areas:

  • Reduced analysis time: performance teams spend fewer hours in spreadsheets and reporting.
  • Smarter budget allocation: faster identification and scaling of winning angles, and earlier pruning of losers.
  • Higher creative hit rate: briefs and concepts are guided by actual performance patterns, not just intuition.

In practice, even a small percentage improvement in ROAS on your main channels often exceeds the implementation and usage cost of Claude by a wide margin. Reruption’s AI PoC approach is designed to validate this quickly in your real environment before you commit to broader rollout.

Reruption supports you end-to-end, from idea to working solution. With our AI PoC offering (9,900€), we first define and scope a concrete use case such as “weekly Claude-powered creative insight for Meta and Google campaigns,” then build a functioning prototype in days: data ingestion, prompt design, and example outputs tailored to your setup.

Beyond the PoC, our Co-Preneur approach means we embed with your marketing and analytics teams, operate inside your P&L, and help you ship real internal tools and workflows – not just slides. We bring the engineering depth to connect Claude into your existing tools where needed, design guardrails for security and compliance, and coach your team on running AI-augmented creative reviews and test planning. The goal is simple: a sustainable, AI-first way of learning which creatives actually drive ROAS in your organization.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media