The Challenge: Weak Creative Performance Insight

Modern marketing teams run hundreds of ad variations across Meta, Google, TikTok, LinkedIn and more. Yet when performance drops, answering a simple question – which creative elements actually drive clicks, conversions, or ROAS? – becomes almost impossible. Data is scattered across platforms, naming conventions are inconsistent, and weekly performance reports rarely go deeper than “this campaign worked, this one didn’t.”

Traditional analysis methods rely on manual spreadsheet work, gut feeling in creative reviews, and one-off deep dives when something is on fire. Analysts manually tag creatives, export CSVs, build pivot tables, and try to isolate variables like headline, visual style, or call-to-action. By the time patterns emerge, the campaign is often over, budgets have shifted, and the opportunity to iterate quickly has been lost. The result is a constant lag between what happens in the market and how your creative strategy responds.

The business impact is substantial. Without clear creative performance insight, brands over-invest in underperforming angles, miss out on scaling winners early, and waste hours each week on low-value reporting. Cost per acquisition creeps up, experimentation slows down, and marketing teams struggle to justify spend in conversations with finance. Over time, this erodes competitive advantage: faster, more data-driven competitors simply learn quicker which creative stories convert and outbid you in the auction.

This challenge is real, but it is solvable. With the latest generation of AI models like Claude, it’s now possible to ingest messy ad exports and transform them into structured, nuanced insight about what truly drives ROAS. At Reruption, we’ve built AI-powered analysis and decision-support tools inside organizations facing similar complexity. The rest of this page walks through practical ways to use Claude to move from noisy dashboards to clear creative hypotheses – and how to set this up so it actually sticks in your marketing workflow.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI-first analytics and decision tools, we’ve seen that the real unlock is not "more data" but better questions and structure. Claude is particularly strong at long-form reasoning over messy inputs – exactly what you need to make sense of raw ad exports, creative briefs, and fragmented dashboards. Used well, Claude can become a creative insight copilot that helps your marketing team see patterns, form hypotheses, and prioritize testing, instead of drowning in spreadsheets.

Think in Creative Hypotheses, Not Just Metrics

Most marketing teams think in terms of surface metrics: CTR, CPC, conversion rate, ROAS. Those are crucial, but they don’t explain why a creative works. To get value from Claude for ad performance optimization, you need to frame the problem as a set of hypotheses: “Is urgency-based messaging outperforming aspirational messaging?” “Do product-centric visuals beat lifestyle shots on retargeting?” Claude is very good at ingesting data and narrative context, then suggesting nuanced hypotheses you can test.

Before you upload any data, write down the 3–5 questions you want Claude to answer about your creatives. Combine quantitative objectives (e.g. lower CPA) with qualitative angles (e.g. emotional tone, problem/solution framing, benefit hierarchy). This mindset shift turns Claude from a glorified reporting tool into a strategic creative insight partner your team can use in ongoing campaign planning.

Design a Minimal but Robust Data Structure

Claude handles unstructured text very well, but for systematic creative performance insight you still need a minimal structure: consistent naming for campaigns, ad sets, and asset variants; clear columns for spend, impressions, clicks, conversions, revenue. Without that, you’ll get interesting narratives but weak, repeatable insight. Reruption often starts projects by defining a pragmatic data schema that your team can actually maintain, instead of a theoretically perfect taxonomy that collapses after two weeks.

Strategically, this also means aligning marketing, analytics, and sometimes finance on what “good performance” means. If your BI team uses contribution margin while your marketers optimize for ROAS, Claude will surface conflicting signals. A shared metric layer – even if simple at first – lets you use Claude to prioritize creative directions in a way the whole organization can trust.

Prepare Your Team for an AI-Augmented Workflow

Introducing Claude into creative performance analysis is not just a tooling change; it’s a workflow and culture shift. Creative, performance marketing, and analytics teams need to understand where AI-driven insights fit into existing rituals like weekly performance calls, creative reviews, and sprint planning. If Claude’s recommendations live in a parallel universe, they’ll be ignored after the initial novelty wears off.

We recommend defining explicit touchpoints: for example, “Every Monday, Claude summarizes last week’s performance and proposes 3 new creative hypotheses,” or “Before new campaigns go live, Claude reviews the brief against past performance patterns.” This makes the AI visible and useful, rather than a side experiment only one analyst cares about.

Mitigate Risk with Guardrails and Human Oversight

Claude is powerful but not infallible. It can misinterpret spurious correlations or overfit to a limited sample of campaigns. Strategically, you need clear guardrails: Claude should suggest patterns and hypotheses, not autonomously switch off your top-performing campaigns or reallocate budgets without human review. Pair its qualitative pattern recognition with your existing quantitative checks in tools like Google Ads, Meta Ads Manager, or your BI stack.

At Reruption, we design workflows where Claude’s output feeds into a human decision step. For example, Claude might propose that “short benefit-led headlines with product imagery” outperform others. A performance marketer then validates this against native platform reports, sanity-checks the sample size, and turns the insight into a structured A/B test plan. This keeps risk low while still accelerating learning.

Start with a Focused Pilot Before Scaling Across Channels

It’s tempting to throw all your Meta, Google, TikTok, and programmatic data at Claude from day one. In practice, this leads to confusion and over-engineering. A better strategic path is to pick one channel and one core objective – e.g. Meta prospecting for new customer acquisition – and pilot Claude as your “creative insights analyst” there. Once the workflow is proven and your team trusts the output, expand step by step.

This pilot-first approach aligns with Reruption’s AI PoC philosophy: validate that AI-driven creative analysis delivers real lift (e.g. lower CPA, higher ROAS, faster creative iteration) in a contained environment. Then, invest in automation, integrations, and process changes to scale it. You de-risk the initiative while still moving faster than traditional consulting or BI projects.

Used with the right structure and mindset, Claude can transform weak creative performance insight into a repeatable advantage: clearer patterns, sharper hypotheses, and faster creative iteration that shows up in ROAS. Reruption combines this tool with deep engineering and workflow design experience to embed AI-driven creative analysis directly into your marketing routines, not just in a slide deck. If you want to explore a focused pilot or turn your existing exports into actionable insight, we’re happy to discuss how our AI PoC and Co-Preneur approach could fit your specific setup.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Healthcare to Manufacturing: Learn how companies successfully use Claude.

Stanford Health Care

Healthcare

Stanford Health Care, a leading academic medical center, faced escalating clinician burnout from overwhelming administrative tasks, including drafting patient correspondence and managing inboxes overloaded with messages. With vast EHR data volumes, extracting insights for precision medicine and real-time patient monitoring was manual and time-intensive, delaying care and increasing error risks. Traditional workflows struggled with predictive analytics for events like sepsis or falls, and computer vision for imaging analysis, amid growing patient volumes. Clinicians spent excessive time on routine communications, such as lab result notifications, hindering focus on complex diagnostics. The need for scalable, unbiased AI algorithms was critical to leverage extensive datasets for better outcomes.

Lösung

Partnering with Microsoft, Stanford became one of the first healthcare systems to pilot Azure OpenAI Service within Epic EHR, enabling generative AI for drafting patient messages and natural language queries on clinical data. This integration used GPT-4 to automate correspondence, reducing manual effort. Complementing this, the Healthcare AI Applied Research Team deployed machine learning for predictive analytics (e.g., sepsis, falls prediction) and explored computer vision in imaging projects. Tools like ChatEHR allow conversational access to patient records, accelerating chart reviews. Phased pilots addressed data privacy and bias, ensuring explainable AI for clinicians.

Ergebnisse

  • 50% reduction in time for drafting patient correspondence
  • 30% decrease in clinician inbox burden from AI message routing
  • 91% accuracy in predictive models for inpatient adverse events
  • 20% faster lab result communication to patients
  • Improved autoimmune detection by 1 year prior to diagnosis
Read case study →

Amazon

Retail

In the vast e-commerce landscape, online shoppers face significant hurdles in product discovery and decision-making. With millions of products available, customers often struggle to find items matching their specific needs, compare options, or get quick answers to nuanced questions about features, compatibility, and usage. Traditional search bars and static listings fall short, leading to shopping cart abandonment rates as high as 70% industry-wide and prolonged decision times that frustrate users. Amazon, serving over 300 million active customers, encountered amplified challenges during peak events like Prime Day, where query volumes spiked dramatically. Shoppers demanded personalized, conversational assistance akin to in-store help, but scaling human support was impossible. Issues included handling complex, multi-turn queries, integrating real-time inventory and pricing data, and ensuring recommendations complied with safety and accuracy standards amid a $500B+ catalog.

Lösung

Amazon developed Rufus, a generative AI-powered conversational shopping assistant embedded in the Amazon Shopping app and desktop. Rufus leverages a custom-built large language model (LLM) fine-tuned on Amazon's product catalog, customer reviews, and web data, enabling natural, multi-turn conversations to answer questions, compare products, and provide tailored recommendations. Powered by Amazon Bedrock for scalability and AWS Trainium/Inferentia chips for efficient inference, Rufus scales to millions of sessions without latency issues. It incorporates agentic capabilities for tasks like cart addition, price tracking, and deal hunting, overcoming prior limitations in personalization by accessing user history and preferences securely. Implementation involved iterative testing, starting with beta in February 2024, expanding to all US users by September, and global rollouts, addressing hallucination risks through grounding techniques and human-in-loop safeguards.

Ergebnisse

  • 60% higher purchase completion rate for Rufus users
  • $10B projected additional sales from Rufus
  • 250M+ customers used Rufus in 2025
  • Monthly active users up 140% YoY
  • Interactions surged 210% YoY
  • Black Friday sales sessions +100% with Rufus
  • 149% jump in Rufus users recently
Read case study →

FedEx

Logistics

FedEx faced suboptimal truck routing challenges in its vast logistics network, where static planning led to excess mileage, inflated fuel costs, and higher labor expenses . Handling millions of packages daily across complex routes, traditional methods struggled with real-time variables like traffic, weather disruptions, and fluctuating demand, resulting in inefficient vehicle utilization and delayed deliveries . These inefficiencies not only drove up operational costs but also increased carbon emissions and undermined customer satisfaction in a highly competitive shipping industry. Scaling solutions for dynamic optimization across thousands of trucks required advanced computational approaches beyond conventional heuristics .

Lösung

Machine learning models integrated with heuristic optimization algorithms formed the core of FedEx's AI-driven route planning system, enabling dynamic route adjustments based on real-time data feeds including traffic, weather, and package volumes . The system employs deep learning for predictive analytics alongside heuristics like genetic algorithms to solve the vehicle routing problem (VRP) efficiently, balancing loads and minimizing empty miles . Implemented as part of FedEx's broader AI supply chain transformation, the solution dynamically reoptimizes routes throughout the day, incorporating sense-and-respond capabilities to adapt to disruptions and enhance overall network efficiency .

Ergebnisse

  • 700,000 excess miles eliminated daily from truck routes
  • Multi-million dollar annual savings in fuel and labor costs
  • Improved delivery time estimate accuracy via ML models
  • Enhanced operational efficiency reducing costs industry-wide
  • Boosted on-time performance through real-time optimizations
  • Significant reduction in carbon footprint from mileage savings
Read case study →

Upstart

Banking

Traditional credit scoring relies heavily on FICO scores, which evaluate only a narrow set of factors like payment history and debt utilization, often rejecting creditworthy borrowers with thin credit files, non-traditional employment, or education histories that signal repayment ability. This results in up to 50% of potential applicants being denied despite low default risk, limiting lenders' ability to expand portfolios safely . Fintech lenders and banks faced the dual challenge of regulatory compliance under fair lending laws while seeking growth. Legacy models struggled with inaccurate risk prediction amid economic shifts, leading to higher defaults or conservative lending that missed opportunities in underserved markets . Upstart recognized that incorporating alternative data could unlock lending to millions previously excluded.

Lösung

Upstart developed an AI-powered lending platform using machine learning models that analyze over 1,600 variables, including education, job history, and bank transaction data, far beyond FICO's 20-30 inputs. Their gradient boosting algorithms predict default probability with higher precision, enabling safer approvals . The platform integrates via API with partner banks and credit unions, providing real-time decisions and fully automated underwriting for most loans. This shift from rule-based to data-driven scoring ensures fairness through explainable AI techniques like feature importance analysis . Implementation involved training models on billions of repayment events, continuously retraining to adapt to new data patterns .

Ergebnisse

  • 44% more loans approved vs. traditional models
  • 36% lower average interest rates for borrowers
  • 80% of loans fully automated
  • 73% fewer losses at equivalent approval rates
  • Adopted by 500+ banks and credit unions by 2024
  • 157% increase in approvals at same risk level
Read case study →

John Deere

Agriculture

In conventional agriculture, farmers rely on blanket spraying of herbicides across entire fields, leading to significant waste. This approach applies chemicals indiscriminately to crops and weeds alike, resulting in high costs for inputs—herbicides can account for 10-20% of variable farming expenses—and environmental harm through soil contamination, water runoff, and accelerated weed resistance . Globally, weeds cause up to 34% yield losses, but overuse of herbicides exacerbates resistance in over 500 species, threatening food security . For row crops like cotton, corn, and soybeans, distinguishing weeds from crops is particularly challenging due to visual similarities, varying field conditions (light, dust, speed), and the need for real-time decisions at 15 mph spraying speeds. Labor shortages and rising chemical prices in 2025 further pressured farmers, with U.S. herbicide costs exceeding $6B annually . Traditional methods failed to balance efficacy, cost, and sustainability.

Lösung

See & Spray revolutionizes weed control by integrating high-resolution cameras, AI-powered computer vision, and precision nozzles on sprayers. The system captures images every few inches, uses object detection models to identify weeds (over 77 species) versus crops in milliseconds, and activates sprays only on targets—reducing blanket application . John Deere acquired Blue River Technology in 2017 to accelerate development, training models on millions of annotated images for robust performance across conditions. Available in Premium (high-density) and Select (affordable retrofit) versions, it integrates with existing John Deere equipment via edge computing for real-time inference without cloud dependency . This robotic precision minimizes drift and overlap, aligning with sustainability goals.

Ergebnisse

  • 5 million acres treated in 2025
  • 31 million gallons of herbicide mix saved
  • Nearly 50% reduction in non-residual herbicide use
  • 77+ weed species detected accurately
  • Up to 90% less chemical in clean crop areas
  • ROI within 1-2 seasons for adopters
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Standardize Your Ad Export and Brief Format for Claude

Claude delivers the best insights when it sees consistent, well-labeled data. Before every analysis session, export your ad performance data (from Meta, Google, etc.) into a structured CSV or Excel and make sure key columns are present: campaign, ad set, ad name, creative text, image/video description or ALT text, spend, impressions, clicks, conversions, revenue/ROAS.

In parallel, align your creative briefs in a standard template (objective, target audience, main message, emotional tone, key benefits, offer). When you share both the export and the brief with Claude, it can connect the intent of the creative with its actual performance, producing deeper insights than metrics-only analysis.

Example prompt to Claude:
You are an AI marketing analyst helping us understand which ad creatives drive ROAS.

Inputs:
1) Ad performance export (CSV pasted below)
2) Creative brief template and a few real examples

Tasks:
- Identify performance patterns across headlines, body copy, visual descriptions, and CTAs.
- Highlight 3–5 creative angles that consistently outperform others.
- Highlight 3–5 angles that consistently underperform.
- Propose 5 concrete hypotheses we should test next week.
- Present results in a structured table with columns: Angle, Evidence, Channels, Suggested Next Test.

Expected outcome: Claude produces an insight report that your performance marketer can quickly review and turn into a prioritized test plan, cutting manual analysis time by several hours per week.

Tag and Decompose Creatives into Testable Elements

To move beyond “this ad works” toward actionable creative insight, you need to break each ad into components: value proposition, emotional tone, offer type, format, CTA style, and visual concept. You can either do this manually or let Claude propose tags based on your raw ad text and descriptions.

Start by asking Claude to generate a tagging scheme and automatically assign tags to each ad row from your export. Then, in a second step, ask it to analyze performance by tag combination.

Example prompt to Claude:
You are a creative performance analyst.
1) Define a concise tagging scheme for our ads, including:
   - Value proposition (e.g. price, quality, convenience, social proof)
   - Emotional tone (e.g. urgent, aspirational, reassuring, playful)
   - Offer type (e.g. discount, free trial, bundle, new launch)
   - Visual concept (based on descriptions in the data)
2) Apply tags to each ad row in the dataset below.
3) Then, analyze performance by tag and tag combination, focusing on ROAS and CPA.
4) Output two tables:
   - Table 1: Tags ranked by performance
   - Table 2: Best-performing tag combinations and their evidence.

Expected outcome: a clear view of which creative themes and combinations actually move your KPIs, enabling more focused ideation and scaling decisions.

Use Claude to Draft Data-Backed Creative Briefs

Once you know which angles perform, close the loop by letting Claude assist with new briefs. Instead of starting from a blank page, you can have Claude produce a data-backed brief that summarizes winning themes, audience insights, and example messages tailored to each channel.

Feed Claude your past performance analysis and ask it to generate a concise brief for the next sprint, aligned with your growth targets and budgets.

Example prompt to Claude:
You are a senior performance creative strategist.
Based on the analysis below (paste Claude's previous insight output), create a creative brief for our next campaign.

Brief should include:
- Objective and primary KPI
- Target audiences and key pain points
- 3–4 winning creative angles with supporting evidence
- Do's and don'ts for copy and visuals, based on past performance
- 5 concrete ad concepts per channel (Meta, Google Display, TikTok) with sample headlines and body copy.

Expected outcome: your creative team receives a structured, insight-based brief that translates past performance into future concepts, reducing back-and-forth and time-to-first-draft.

Automate Weekly Creative Performance Summaries

Instead of manually compiling weekly decks, you can give Claude a recurring task: ingest the latest exports and generate a standardized insight summary for your team. This doesn’t require deep integration at first – even a simple workflow where an analyst exports CSVs and pastes them into Claude on Monday morning can dramatically speed up reporting.

Define a fixed summary format that matches how your leadership and creative teams like to consume insight.

Example prompt to Claude:
You are our weekly creative insights assistant.
Using the ad performance data from last week (pasted below):
- Summarize overall performance vs. the previous 4 weeks.
- Identify top 10 winning creatives and explain WHY they worked.
- Identify top 10 underperformers and likely reasons.
- Suggest 5 concrete optimization actions for this week.
- Produce an email-ready summary with bullet points for leadership
  and a more detailed section for the performance/creative team.

Expected outcome: consistent, high-quality weekly insights in 10–15 minutes instead of hours, freeing your senior marketers to focus on decisions, not deck-building.

Turn Insights into Structured Test Plans and Naming Conventions

Insight only matters if it changes what you test next. Use Claude to convert qualitative findings into a structured A/B testing roadmap and harmonized naming conventions that make future analysis easier. This creates a virtuous cycle: better naming → better data → better insights.

Ask Claude to propose a testing backlog prioritized by expected impact and ease of implementation, plus a naming scheme that encodes key creative variables, so next month’s exports are easier to analyze.

Example prompt to Claude:
You are an experimentation lead.
Given the creative insight report below, create:
1) A prioritized test plan for the next 4 weeks, including:
   - Test name
   - Hypothesis
   - Variants to create
   - Primary KPI and guardrail metrics
2) A simple, scalable naming convention for campaigns/ad sets/ads
   that encodes: audience, offer, angle, format, and CTA.
3) A checklist for our team to follow when setting up each new test.

Expected outcome: a clear roadmap for experimentation and a consistent naming convention that makes each future Claude analysis faster and more reliable.

Expected Outcomes and Realistic Benchmarks

When implemented as part of your workflow, Claude-powered creative insight typically aims at three realistic outcomes in the first 8–12 weeks: (1) 30–50% reduction in manual analysis and reporting time for performance marketers, (2) consistently faster creative iteration cycles (e.g. from monthly to bi-weekly or weekly), and (3) measurable improvements in ROAS or CPA on key campaigns driven by better scaling of winning angles and earlier pruning of weak ones. Exact numbers will depend on your spend levels, test volume, and how tightly you integrate Claude’s recommendations into decision-making, but the pattern is clear: more learning per euro spent.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude can ingest your raw ad exports, creative text, and even high-level briefs, then decompose each ad into themes and elements such as value proposition, emotional tone, offer type, and visual concept. It then cross-references these elements with performance metrics like CTR, CPA, and ROAS to surface patterns you would struggle to see manually.

Instead of just telling you which ads worked, Claude helps explain why they worked, proposing clear hypotheses like “social proof + reassurance tone performs best on retargeting” or “short, benefit-led headlines outperform feature lists on prospecting.” This lets your team focus new creative work and budget on the angles that empirically move the needle.

You don’t need a large data science team to benefit from Claude-based creative analysis. In most organizations, the core requirements are:

  • A performance marketer or analyst who can export data from your ad platforms and understands your core KPIs.
  • Someone who can maintain basic consistency in naming conventions and brief templates.
  • Clear ownership of the workflow (e.g. “performance lead runs the weekly Claude analysis and shares insights”).

Claude handles the heavy lifting of reading raw tables, interpreting text, and suggesting patterns. Reruption can help you define the right prompts, data structure, and routines so your existing team can run this without hiring new specialists.

Time-to-impact depends on your spend level and test velocity, but many teams see qualitative improvements in clarity within the first 1–2 weeks: clearer weekly summaries, better hypotheses, and more focused briefs. Quantitative impact on ROAS and CPA usually appears over a few test cycles, typically in the 4–12 week range, as you start to scale proven angles and stop funding weak ones earlier.

The key is to treat Claude as part of your experimentation loop: analyze → hypothesize → test → analyze again. If your team is already running frequent creative tests, Claude can accelerate learning quickly. If your testing culture is still maturing, the first benefit will be structure and speed in how you prioritize what to test.

The direct cost of using Claude is relatively low compared to typical media budgets or agency retainers. The main investment is in setting up the right workflows, prompts, and data structure. ROI comes from three areas:

  • Reduced analysis time: performance teams spend fewer hours in spreadsheets and reporting.
  • Smarter budget allocation: faster identification and scaling of winning angles, and earlier pruning of losers.
  • Higher creative hit rate: briefs and concepts are guided by actual performance patterns, not just intuition.

In practice, even a small percentage improvement in ROAS on your main channels often exceeds the implementation and usage cost of Claude by a wide margin. Reruption’s AI PoC approach is designed to validate this quickly in your real environment before you commit to broader rollout.

Reruption supports you end-to-end, from idea to working solution. With our AI PoC offering (9,900€), we first define and scope a concrete use case such as “weekly Claude-powered creative insight for Meta and Google campaigns,” then build a functioning prototype in days: data ingestion, prompt design, and example outputs tailored to your setup.

Beyond the PoC, our Co-Preneur approach means we embed with your marketing and analytics teams, operate inside your P&L, and help you ship real internal tools and workflows – not just slides. We bring the engineering depth to connect Claude into your existing tools where needed, design guardrails for security and compliance, and coach your team on running AI-augmented creative reviews and test planning. The goal is simple: a sustainable, AI-first way of learning which creatives actually drive ROAS in your organization.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media