The Challenge: Skill Obsolescence Risk

HR teams are under pressure to keep the workforce relevant while technology, regulation and business models keep changing. Many organisations rely on skills that are quietly becoming obsolete, but HR often lacks a clear view of which roles and which skills will be at risk in the next 12–24 months. Instead of a forward-looking skills radar, most companies operate with static job descriptions, annual performance reviews and scattered training records.

Traditional workforce planning tools and methods were designed for slower cycles. Competency frameworks are updated every few years, market trend reports stay in PDFs, and skill assessments are manual and episodic. Even when HR has access to HRIS, LMS and engagement data, it is rarely connected with external signals like technology trends, automation potential or regulatory changes. The result: HR decisions about reskilling, recruiting and redeployment are based more on intuition than on data-driven workforce risk analytics.

When skill obsolescence risk is not managed proactively, the business impact compounds quickly. You see rising attrition in critical teams, late realisation that entire role families are misaligned with future needs, and sudden hiring spikes in highly competitive markets. This leads to costly layoffs, rushed external hiring, overuse of contractors, and missed opportunities to redeploy and upskill existing employees. Strategically, the organisation becomes slower to adopt new technologies and loses competitive ground to players that can shift their skills portfolio faster.

The good news is that this challenge is tough but solvable. Modern AI workforce analytics can connect your internal HR data with external trend information to forecast where skills are drifting out of date long before it shows up in KPIs. At Reruption, we’ve helped organisations turn vague concerns about “future skills” into concrete risk maps, scenarios and reskilling roadmaps. In the rest of this page, you’ll find practical guidance on how to use Gemini to get ahead of skill obsolescence and make HR a driver of proactive workforce strategy.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building real-world AI solutions in HR and talent management, we’ve seen that predicting skill obsolescence risk is less about having perfect data and more about asking the right questions with the right tools. Gemini is particularly powerful here because it can read job descriptions, training catalogues, HRIS extracts and external trend reports in context and turn them into actionable insights for workforce risk prediction. The key is to frame Gemini as a decision-support engine for HR, not just a chatbot, and to embed it into your planning processes so that skill risk becomes a continuous signal, not a one-off study.

Treat Skill Obsolescence as a Strategic Portfolio Problem

Most HR functions still think about skills at the individual role level: "What should a sales manager know?" For skill obsolescence prediction, you need to shift to a portfolio mindset: "Which clusters of roles rely on the same underlying skills, and how exposed is that portfolio to change?" Gemini can help you group job descriptions, projects and learning history into skill clusters, but the strategic decision is to manage those clusters like an investment portfolio.

In practice, that means defining your critical skill domains (e.g. legacy tech stacks, compliance-heavy roles, manual data processing) and asking Gemini to assess their exposure to automation, regulation and market shifts. HR, business leaders and IT should jointly decide what level of workforce risk is acceptable in each domain, just as finance decides on risk appetite in investments. This strategic framing gives your Gemini outputs a clear decision context.

Start with Coarse-Grained Risk Mapping Before Detail

A common mistake is to jump straight into detailed role-by-role skill mapping. That’s slow and frustrating, especially if your data is incomplete. Strategically, it’s better to use Gemini first to create a coarse-grained risk heatmap across major role families and business units. This helps you see where the biggest exposure lies without getting stuck in perfectionism.

You can feed Gemini anonymised job profiles, organisation charts and a summary of your tech stack and ask it to highlight role families most likely to be impacted by automation or regulatory change in the next 12–36 months. Once you see the hot spots, you can decide where it’s worth investing in deeper analysis, interviews and detailed skill taxonomy work. This staged approach reduces risk and keeps stakeholders engaged because value appears quickly.

Position Gemini as a Co-Analyst, Not an Oracle

For HR and business leaders to trust AI-driven workforce predictions, they need to understand that Gemini is a powerful co-analyst, not an unquestionable oracle. Strategically, this means designing a review process where Gemini’s outputs are challenged and refined by HRBPs, managers and, in some cases, employee representatives.

Build governance where Gemini generates initial risk scores and scenario narratives, and human experts validate or adjust them using their contextual knowledge of projects, clients and strategy. This hybrid approach reduces the risk of over- or under-estimating skill obsolescence based on incomplete data, and it increases buy-in because stakeholders helped shape the conclusions.

Align Workforce Risk Analytics with Business and Technology Roadmaps

Skill obsolescence rarely happens in isolation; it follows technology and product decisions. Strategically, your use of Gemini should be tied to business and IT roadmaps, not run as a standalone HR exercise. Otherwise you end up predicting risks that nobody plans to act on, or missing risks tied to upcoming platform or product changes.

Make sure HR has access to roadmaps for major system migrations, automation initiatives, new product launches and regulatory projects. Then use Gemini to simulate how each roadmap scenario changes your future skill requirements. This creates a shared language between HR, IT and business leaders: "If we automate this process in 18 months, what happens to these 200 roles?" That’s where Gemini’s ability to read technical documents and translate them into workforce implications becomes strategically valuable.

Build Internal Capability, Not One-Off Analyses

The real strategic win is to turn skill risk analytics into a continuous capability, not a single consulting exercise. That means planning from the start how your team will operate and maintain a Gemini-based workflow: who owns the prompts, who updates data feeds, how often scenarios are refreshed, and how results feed into budgeting, L&D planning and recruiting.

Invest in upskilling a small cross-functional squad—HR analytics, HRBPs, L&D and someone from IT or data—to become your internal "skills radar" team. With coaching and clear playbooks, they can own Gemini configurations and ensure the organisation doesn’t revert to static spreadsheets once the initial excitement fades. Reruption’s Co-Preneur approach is built around leaving behind these kinds of self-sufficient capabilities, not just slideware.

Used strategically, Gemini can turn skill obsolescence from a vague fear into a manageable, quantified workforce risk that HR can act on with confidence. By combining your HR data, job architecture and external trends, it surfaces the roles most exposed to change and helps you design realistic reskilling and redeployment scenarios. At Reruption, we specialise in turning these ideas into working AI workflows inside HR teams, from first PoC to embedded capability. If you want to explore how Gemini could power a tailored "skills radar" for your organisation, we’re ready to help you test it in a focused, low-risk way.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Banking to News Media: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

JPMorgan Chase

Banking

In the high-stakes world of asset management and wealth management at JPMorgan Chase, advisors faced significant time burdens from manual research, document summarization, and report drafting. Generating investment ideas, market insights, and personalized client reports often took hours or days, limiting time for client interactions and strategic advising. This inefficiency was exacerbated post-ChatGPT, as the bank recognized the need for secure, internal AI to handle vast proprietary data without risking compliance or security breaches. The Private Bank advisors specifically struggled with preparing for client meetings, sifting through research reports, and creating tailored recommendations amid regulatory scrutiny and data silos, hindering productivity and client responsiveness in a competitive landscape.

Lösung

JPMorgan addressed these challenges by developing the LLM Suite, an internal suite of seven fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) powered by generative AI, integrated with secure data infrastructure. This platform enables advisors to draft reports, generate investment ideas, and summarize documents rapidly using proprietary data. A specialized tool, Connect Coach, was created for Private Bank advisors to assist in client preparation, idea generation, and research synthesis. The implementation emphasized governance, risk management, and employee training through AI competitions and 'learn-by-doing' approaches, ensuring safe scaling across the firm. LLM Suite rolled out progressively, starting with proofs-of-concept and expanding firm-wide.

Ergebnisse

  • Users reached: 140,000 employees
  • Use cases developed: 450+ proofs-of-concept
  • Financial upside: Up to $2 billion in AI value
  • Deployment speed: From pilot to 60K users in months
  • Advisor tools: Connect Coach for Private Bank
  • Firm-wide PoCs: Rigorous ROI measurement across 450 initiatives
Read case study →

Rolls-Royce Holdings

Aerospace

Jet engines are highly complex, operating under extreme conditions with millions of components subject to wear. Airlines faced unexpected failures leading to costly groundings, with unplanned maintenance causing millions in daily losses per aircraft. Traditional scheduled maintenance was inefficient, often resulting in over-maintenance or missed issues, exacerbating downtime and fuel inefficiency. Rolls-Royce needed to predict failures proactively amid vast data from thousands of engines in flight. Challenges included integrating real-time IoT sensor data (hundreds per engine), handling terabytes of telemetry, and ensuring accuracy in predictions to avoid false alarms that could disrupt operations. The aerospace industry's stringent safety regulations added pressure to deliver reliable AI without compromising performance.

Lösung

Rolls-Royce developed the IntelligentEngine platform, combining digital twins—virtual replicas of physical engines—with machine learning models. Sensors stream live data to cloud-based systems, where ML algorithms analyze patterns to predict wear, anomalies, and optimal maintenance windows. Digital twins enable simulation of engine behavior pre- and post-flight, optimizing designs and schedules. Partnerships with Microsoft Azure IoT and Siemens enhanced data processing and VR modeling, scaling AI across Trent series engines like Trent 7000 and 1000. Ethical AI frameworks ensure data security and bias-free predictions.

Ergebnisse

  • 48% increase in time on wing before first removal
  • Doubled Trent 7000 engine time on wing
  • Reduced unplanned downtime by up to 30%
  • Improved fuel efficiency by 1-2% via optimized ops
  • Cut maintenance costs by 20-25% for operators
  • Processed terabytes of real-time data from 1000s of engines
Read case study →

Unilever

Human Resources

Unilever, a consumer goods giant handling 1.8 million job applications annually, struggled with a manual recruitment process that was extremely time-consuming and inefficient . Traditional methods took up to four months to fill positions, overburdening recruiters and delaying talent acquisition across its global operations . The process also risked unconscious biases in CV screening and interviews, limiting workforce diversity and potentially overlooking qualified candidates from underrepresented groups . High volumes made it impossible to assess every applicant thoroughly, leading to high costs estimated at millions annually and inconsistent hiring quality . Unilever needed a scalable, fair system to streamline early-stage screening while maintaining psychometric rigor.

Lösung

Unilever adopted an AI-powered recruitment funnel partnering with Pymetrics for neuroscience-based gamified assessments that measure cognitive, emotional, and behavioral traits via ML algorithms trained on diverse global data . This was followed by AI-analyzed video interviews using computer vision and NLP to evaluate body language, facial expressions, tone of voice, and word choice objectively . Applications were anonymized to minimize bias, with AI shortlisting top 10-20% of candidates for human review, integrating psychometric ML models for personality profiling . The system was piloted in high-volume entry-level roles before global rollout .

Ergebnisse

  • Time-to-hire: 90% reduction (4 months to 4 weeks)
  • Recruiter time saved: 50,000 hours
  • Annual cost savings: £1 million
  • Diversity hires increase: 16% (incl. neuro-atypical candidates)
  • Candidates shortlisted for humans: 90% reduction
  • Applications processed: 1.8 million/year
Read case study →

NatWest

Banking

NatWest Group, a leading UK bank serving over 19 million customers, grappled with escalating demands for digital customer service. Traditional systems like the original Cora chatbot handled routine queries effectively but struggled with complex, nuanced interactions, often escalating 80-90% of cases to human agents. This led to delays, higher operational costs, and risks to customer satisfaction amid rising expectations for instant, personalized support . Simultaneously, the surge in financial fraud posed a critical threat, requiring seamless fraud reporting and detection within chat interfaces without compromising security or user trust. Regulatory compliance, data privacy under UK GDPR, and ethical AI deployment added layers of complexity, as the bank aimed to scale support while minimizing errors in high-stakes banking scenarios . Balancing innovation with reliability was paramount; poor AI performance could erode trust in a sector where customer satisfaction directly impacts retention and revenue .

Lösung

Cora+, launched in June 2024, marked NatWest's first major upgrade using generative AI to enable proactive, intuitive responses for complex queries, reducing escalations and enhancing self-service . This built on Cora's established platform, which already managed millions of interactions monthly. In a pioneering move, NatWest partnered with OpenAI in March 2025—becoming the first UK-headquartered bank to do so—integrating LLMs into both customer-facing Cora and internal tool Ask Archie. This allowed natural language processing for fraud reports, personalized advice, and process simplification while embedding safeguards for compliance and bias mitigation . The approach emphasized ethical AI, with rigorous testing, human oversight, and continuous monitoring to ensure safe, accurate interactions in fraud detection and service delivery .

Ergebnisse

  • 150% increase in Cora customer satisfaction scores (2024)
  • Proactive resolution of complex queries without human intervention
  • First UK bank OpenAI partnership, accelerating AI adoption
  • Enhanced fraud detection via real-time chat analysis
  • Millions of monthly interactions handled autonomously
  • Significant reduction in agent escalation rates
Read case study →

Cruise (GM)

Automotive

Developing a self-driving taxi service in dense urban environments posed immense challenges for Cruise. Complex scenarios like unpredictable pedestrians, erratic cyclists, construction zones, and adverse weather demanded near-perfect perception and decision-making in real-time. Safety was paramount, as any failure could result in accidents, regulatory scrutiny, or public backlash. Early testing revealed gaps in handling edge cases, such as emergency vehicles or occluded objects, requiring robust AI to exceed human driver performance. A pivotal safety incident in October 2023 amplified these issues: a Cruise vehicle struck a pedestrian pushed into its path by a hit-and-run driver, then dragged her while fleeing the scene, leading to suspension of operations nationwide. This exposed vulnerabilities in post-collision behavior, sensor fusion under chaos, and regulatory compliance. Scaling to commercial robotaxi fleets while achieving zero at-fault incidents proved elusive amid $10B+ investments from GM.

Lösung

Cruise addressed these with an integrated AI stack leveraging computer vision for perception and reinforcement learning for planning. Lidar, radar, and 30+ cameras fed into CNNs and transformers for object detection, semantic segmentation, and scene prediction, processing 360° views at high fidelity even in low light or rain. Reinforcement learning optimized trajectory planning and behavioral decisions, trained on millions of simulated miles to handle rare events. End-to-end neural networks refined motion forecasting, while simulation frameworks accelerated iteration without real-world risk. Post-incident, Cruise enhanced safety protocols, resuming supervised testing in 2024 with improved disengagement rates. GM's pivot integrated this tech into Super Cruise evolution for personal vehicles.

Ergebnisse

  • 1,000,000+ miles driven fully autonomously by 2023
  • 5 million driverless miles used for AI model training
  • $10B+ cumulative investment by GM in Cruise (2016-2024)
  • 30,000+ miles per intervention in early unsupervised tests
  • Operations suspended Oct 2023; resumed supervised May 2024
  • Zero commercial robotaxi revenue; pivoted Dec 2024
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Use Gemini to Build a Dynamic Skills Inventory from Existing HR Data

Most companies already have the raw ingredients for a skills view: job descriptions, CVs, project histories and training records. The challenge is that they live in different systems and formats. You can use Gemini for HR data synthesis to create a first pass skills inventory without waiting for a multi-year HRIS overhaul.

Export a sample of job descriptions, anonymised CV data and training catalogue entries to a secure workspace. Then use Gemini to extract and normalise skills across these sources, clustering similar terms (e.g. "Excel macros" and "VBA automation").

Example prompt to generate a skills inventory:
You are an HR analytics assistant.

Input:
- A list of job descriptions
- Anonymised CV snippets (responsibilities, tools used)
- Training course titles and descriptions

Tasks:
1. Extract a list of skills (technical, functional, soft) mentioned across all inputs.
2. Group similar skills into unified terms (e.g. "Excel macros" and "VBA scripting" = "Spreadsheet automation").
3. For each role title, list the top 10 skills required today.
4. Return the result as structured JSON with fields: role_title, core_skills[], secondary_skills[].

Expected outcome: within a few days, HR has a living skills map for a subset of the organisation, which can be expanded iteratively and used as a baseline for obsolescence analysis.

Combine External Trend Reports with Internal Roles to Score Obsolescence Risk

Gemini’s strength is reading long, complex documents and connecting them to your context. Use it to merge external sources—industry reports, automation studies, regulatory outlooks—with your skills inventory to produce an initial skill obsolescence risk score per role family.

Upload or link relevant reports and your internal role catalogue, then use a structured prompt to make Gemini explicit about scoring logic.

Example prompt to score obsolescence risk:
You are an AI assistant helping HR assess skill obsolescence risk.

Input:
- A table of roles with associated core skills
- Excerpts from technology trend and automation reports
- Regulatory and market trend summaries

Tasks:
1. For each role, estimate the risk that its core skills become obsolete or heavily automated within 12, 24, and 36 months.
2. Use a 1-5 scale (1 = low risk, 5 = very high risk) and justify each rating in 2-3 sentences.
3. Highlight which specific skills drive the risk up or down.
4. Suggest whether the primary strategy should be: reskill, upskill, redeploy, or replace via external hiring.

Output in table form (role, 12/24/36-month risk scores, key drivers, suggested strategy).

Expected outcome: a tangible, explainable risk heatmap you can discuss with leaders, rather than abstract "future of work" debates.

Run Scenario Simulations to Support Strategic Workforce Planning

Once you have risk scores, use Gemini to simulate workforce scenarios and interventions. This goes beyond static heatmaps and turns Gemini into a planning tool for proactive reskilling strategies.

Prepare a simple spreadsheet with role counts, risk levels and key interventions (e.g. "reskill 30% of X roles to data analyst", "automate 40% of Y tasks"). Then ask Gemini to model the qualitative and quantitative impacts.

Example prompt for scenario planning:
You are supporting strategic workforce planning.

Input:
- A table of role families with FTE counts and obsolescence risk scores
- A list of potential interventions (reskilling programs, redeployment options, automation initiatives)
- High-level cost parameters (training cost per FTE, hiring cost per external hire)

Tasks:
1. Create 3 scenarios (Conservative, Balanced, Aggressive) for the next 24 months.
2. For each scenario, estimate:
   - How many FTEs can be reskilled vs need to be replaced externally
   - Approximate training vs hiring cost
   - Main execution risks
3. Summarise each scenario in a 1-page narrative for executives.

Expected outcome: HR can walk into workforce planning meetings with clear options, cost ranges and risks, grounded in consistent logic.

Generate Targeted Reskilling Roadmaps and Employee Communications

Predicting risk is only half the job; employees need clear, credible paths forward. Gemini can help translate complex analytics into reskilling roadmaps and communication materials tailored to different audiences.

Use your risk map to define priority transition pathways (e.g. back-office operations → customer success; legacy systems developer → cloud engineer). Feed Gemini example learning paths from your LMS and ask it to design role-specific roadmaps with concrete steps and timelines, plus messaging that addresses typical employee concerns.

Example prompt to create reskilling roadmaps & comms:
You are an HR communication and learning design assistant.

Input:
- Role A: current responsibilities and core skills
- Target Role B: responsibilities and required skills
- List of internal courses, certifications, and on-the-job learning options
- Organisational context: timeframe (18 months), business priorities

Tasks:
1. Design a step-by-step reskilling roadmap from Role A to Role B (phases, skills, courses, practice projects).
2. Estimate a realistic timeline and weekly time investment for employees.
3. Draft an email from HR to affected employees explaining:
   - Why the change is happening
   - The support offered
   - What is expected from them
4. Draft a manager FAQ to help them coach employees through the transition.

Expected outcome: consistent, empathetic communication and clear learning journeys, reducing resistance and uncertainty around change.

Embed Gemini Workflows Into HR’s Regular Planning Cycles

To avoid the "one-and-done" trap, embed Gemini into your existing HR calendar: strategic workforce planning, budgeting, performance and talent reviews. This turns skill obsolescence monitoring into a continuous process.

Define a simple operating rhythm, for example: quarterly refresh of the skills inventory and risk scores; biannual scenario updates tied to budget cycles; annual deep dives for selected role families. Document the prompts, inputs and outputs as standard operating procedures and assign ownership to specific people in HR analytics or strategic HR.

Example lightweight SOP structure:
- Frequency: Quarterly
- Owner: HR Analytics Lead
- Inputs: Updated role list, HRIS headcount data, recent tech/market updates
- Gemini Prompts: <link to internal prompt library>
- Outputs: Updated risk heatmap, 1-page summary for EXCO
- Follow-up: HRBPs review and identify 3-5 priority actions per business unit.

Expected outcome: a repeatable workflow where Gemini augments HR’s planning discipline, leading over 12–24 months to fewer surprise skill gaps, more internal mobility and more targeted training investments. Many organisations can realistically expect a reduction in external hiring for critical roles by 10–20% and a noticeable decrease in last-minute, reactive workforce decisions once this capability is mature.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini works best when it can combine multiple HR data sources, but you don’t need a perfect data landscape to start. At minimum, you should have:

  • Recent job descriptions or role profiles for key roles
  • Basic HRIS data: headcount by role, location and business unit
  • Access to your training catalogue or learning platform
  • Any existing competency models or skill frameworks (even if incomplete)

Optional but helpful inputs include anonymised CV data, project histories, performance summaries and documentation on your tech stack and upcoming change initiatives. In early PoCs, Reruption often starts with just role profiles and a subset of HRIS data, then gradually integrates richer sources as the value becomes clear.

Initial insights can be generated surprisingly fast if the scope is focused. For a subset of roles (e.g. 50–100 key profiles), it is realistic to get a first skill obsolescence heatmap within 2–4 weeks, including data preparation, prompt design and validation workshops.

Building a more robust, repeatable capability—integrated with your planning cycles and able to handle hundreds or thousands of roles—typically takes several months, depending on data access, stakeholder availability and IT constraints. Reruption’s AI PoC format is intentionally designed to give you a working prototype and concrete performance metrics in a short, fixed timeframe, so you can decide how far to scale.

No, you don’t need a full data science team inside HR to benefit from Gemini for HR analytics, but you do need a small cross-functional group with the right skills:

  • Someone in HR analytics or controlling who understands your data structures
  • HR business partners or talent experts who can validate risk assessments
  • Basic IT or data support to ensure secure data access and integration

Gemini abstracts away most of the traditional machine learning complexity: you interact with it via prompts and structured instructions rather than by coding models from scratch. Reruption typically helps clients set up reusable prompts, data pipelines and governance so that HR teams can operate the solution day to day without deep ML expertise.

The ROI from AI-driven workforce risk management comes from avoiding costly surprises and making better use of your existing people. Typical value levers include:

  • Reducing emergency external hiring for skills you could have developed internally
  • Lowering layoff costs by planning redeployment and reskilling earlier
  • Targeting training budgets at high-impact skill transitions instead of generic programmes
  • Improving retention of critical employees by offering visible future paths

While exact figures depend on your context, many organisations can reasonably aim for a 10–20% reduction in external hiring for critical roles over 2–3 years and a measurable improvement in internal mobility. A focused PoC with Gemini helps quantify these effects using your own data and cost assumptions before you commit to a full rollout.

Reruption supports organisations end-to-end, from idea to working AI workforce analytics solution. With our 9.900€ AI PoC offering, we validate in a few weeks whether Gemini can deliver accurate, useful skill risk predictions for your specific roles, data and constraints—using a real prototype, not just slides.

Beyond the PoC, our Co-Preneur approach means we work inside your organisation like a co-founder: scoping use cases with HR and business leaders, designing prompts and workflows, ensuring security and compliance, and building the internal capability to run Gemini-based analyses on your own. We don’t just advise on "future skills"; we ship concrete tools—risk heatmaps, dashboards, and reskilling playbooks—that your HR team can use in the next planning cycle.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media