The Challenge: Poor Knowledge Retention

HR and L&D teams spend significant budget and time on training programs, but much of that investment evaporates within weeks. Employees attend workshops, complete e-learnings, pass quizzes – and then struggle to recall or apply the content in real work situations. Knowledge retention is low because learning is treated as an event instead of an ongoing process embedded into daily workflows.

Traditional approaches to corporate learning – classroom sessions, long slide decks, static e-learning modules – were not designed for the pace and complexity of today’s work. Employees are overloaded, context-switching constantly, and rarely have the time or mental energy to revisit training materials. Generic refresher courses, annual compliance re-runs, or mass email reminders don’t match individual roles, skill gaps, or moments of need, so they fail to stick.

The business impact is substantial. Poor knowledge retention leads to inconsistent quality, repeated mistakes, rework, and slower onboarding. Managers lose trust in HR training because behavior and performance don’t change measurably. It becomes hard to argue for L&D budgets when you cannot show that people actually use what they learned. In competitive markets, this translates into slower innovation, higher risk exposure, and a growing capability gap versus organizations that systematically turn learning into performance.

The challenge is real, but it is solvable. Modern AI for HR and L&D allows companies to move from one-off training events to adaptive, continuous learning support. At Reruption, we’ve helped organizations build AI-powered learning experiences and internal tools that keep critical knowledge close to the work. In the sections below, you’ll find practical guidance on how to use Gemini to tackle poor knowledge retention and turn training content into everyday performance support.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI-powered learning products and internal tools, our view is clear: tackling poor knowledge retention is less about buying more content and more about orchestrating knowledge with AI. Gemini is a strong fit here because it can index internal learning assets, generate adaptive learning paths, and deliver just-in-time answers inside your existing HR and L&D ecosystem. Used correctly, it becomes an invisible layer that turns sporadic trainings into continuous, personalized performance support.

Treat Knowledge Retention as a Continuous Process, Not a One-Off Event

Before implementing any tool, HR leaders need to shift their mental model. Poor knowledge retention is not a “content problem” that more slides or longer workshops will fix. It is a process problem: learning is not reinforced at the right time, in the right format, and in the right context. Gemini is most effective when it is embedded into this continuous process, not just layered on top of existing courses as an afterthought.

Strategically, this means mapping your critical skill areas – for example, sales conversations, leadership basics, safety rules, HR policies – and defining how employees should be supported before, during, and after a training. Gemini can then be configured to provide micro-prework, in-session support, and post-training reinforcement aligned with these stages. Without this end-to-end design, you risk ending up with another disconnected tool that produces interesting AI outputs but little change in behavior.

Start with High-Impact, Narrow Use Cases

Trying to “fix all L&D” with Gemini at once is a recipe for confusion. A better strategy is to start with a narrow, high-impact use case where knowledge retention clearly impacts performance and where outcomes can be measured. Typical candidates are onboarding for a critical role, a new product launch, or a safety/compliance topic where errors are costly.

By focusing Gemini on one well-defined domain at first, you can curate the right internal content, tune access controls, and design reinforcement flows with much less risk. You gain evidence on how AI-driven learning reinforcement changes behavior, which makes it easier to secure stakeholder buy-in for expansion. This mirrors how we approach our AI PoCs at Reruption: a clearly scoped use case, fast technical validation, and then a production roadmap instead of an endless pilot.

Design for Existing Workflows and Tools, Not Parallel Experiences

Even the best AI assistant will fail if employees need to go to yet another portal or app they never open. Strategically, your goal is to bring Gemini for learning and knowledge support into the tools people already use: your LMS, HR portal, collaboration tools, or even existing intranet pages. This reduces friction and increases adoption, which is essential for long-term knowledge retention.

From an organizational perspective, this means aligning HR, IT, and business stakeholders early on. Clarify which systems Gemini should integrate with, who owns the data, and how access and permissions are managed. Thinking about integration and change management from the start avoids the common pattern where AI pilots impress a small group but never scale across the organization.

Prepare Your Content and Data Foundation

Gemini is powerful, but it can only surface relevant, trustworthy answers if your underlying learning content, FAQs, SOPs, and policy documents are reasonably structured and discoverable. Many HR teams underestimate this step and jump directly into “playing with prompts”, which leads to inconsistent results and low trust from employees and managers.

Strategically, plan a content readiness sprint: identify which materials are still relevant, remove outdated assets, standardize naming and tagging, and define which sources are considered authoritative. This doesn’t have to be perfect, but it needs to be explicit. With this foundation, Gemini can index and reason over your content, allowing you to build adaptive learning paths and microlearning experiences that actually reflect your current policies and practices.

Define Clear Success Metrics and Guardrails

To move beyond experimentation, HR needs a clear view of what success looks like when using Gemini to improve knowledge retention. Set a limited number of metrics up front: quiz scores 30–60 days post-training, reduction in repetitive questions to HR, faster time-to-productivity for new hires, or fewer errors in processes covered by training. These KPIs give direction to your AI implementation and help you decide where to double down.

At the same time, define guardrails: what topics should Gemini not answer? When should it escalate to a human expert? How will you monitor content quality and bias? By treating this as a strategic design question, not an afterthought, you increase trust and adoption. In our experience, clear metrics and guardrails are what convince risk-averse stakeholders that AI in HR and L&D can be both powerful and safe.

Using Gemini for HR learning and development is most effective when it’s framed as a way to orchestrate continuous reinforcement, not just generate more content. With a focused scope, solid content foundation, and clear success metrics, you can measurably reduce knowledge loss and connect training to real performance outcomes. Reruption combines deep engineering experience with an AI-first perspective on L&D to help you design, prototype, and scale these solutions; if you want to see what Gemini can do for your specific retention challenges, we’re ready to explore it with you in a concrete, hands-on way.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Healthcare to Financial Services: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Mass General Brigham

Healthcare

Mass General Brigham, one of the largest healthcare systems in the U.S., faced a deluge of medical imaging data from radiology, pathology, and surgical procedures. With millions of scans annually across its 12 hospitals, clinicians struggled with analysis overload, leading to delays in diagnosis and increased burnout rates among radiologists and surgeons. The need for precise, rapid interpretation was critical, as manual reviews limited throughput and risked errors in complex cases like tumor detection or surgical risk assessment. Additionally, operative workflows required better predictive tools. Surgeons needed models to forecast complications, optimize scheduling, and personalize interventions, but fragmented data silos and regulatory hurdles impeded progress. Staff shortages exacerbated these issues, demanding decision support systems to alleviate cognitive load and improve patient outcomes.

Lösung

To address these, Mass General Brigham established a dedicated Artificial Intelligence Center, centralizing research, development, and deployment of hundreds of AI models focused on computer vision for imaging and predictive analytics for surgery. This enterprise-wide initiative integrates ML into clinical workflows, partnering with tech giants like Microsoft for foundation models in medical imaging. Key solutions include deep learning algorithms for automated anomaly detection in X-rays, MRIs, and CTs, reducing radiologist review time. For surgery, predictive models analyze patient data to predict post-op risks, enhancing planning. Robust governance frameworks ensure ethical deployment, addressing bias and explainability.

Ergebnisse

  • $30 million AI investment fund established
  • Hundreds of AI models managed for radiology and pathology
  • Improved diagnostic throughput via AI-assisted radiology
  • AI foundation models developed through Microsoft partnership
  • Initiatives for AI governance in medical imaging deployed
  • Reduced clinician workload and burnout through decision support
Read case study →

Zalando

E-commerce

In the online fashion retail sector, high return rates—often exceeding 30-40% for apparel—stem primarily from fit and sizing uncertainties, as customers cannot physically try on items before purchase . Zalando, Europe's largest fashion e-tailer serving 27 million active customers across 25 markets, faced substantial challenges with these returns, incurring massive logistics costs, environmental impact, and customer dissatisfaction due to inconsistent sizing across over 6,000 brands and 150,000+ products . Traditional size charts and recommendations proved insufficient, with early surveys showing up to 50% of returns attributed to poor fit perception, hindering conversion rates and repeat purchases in a competitive market . This was compounded by the lack of immersive shopping experiences online, leading to hesitation among tech-savvy millennials and Gen Z shoppers who demanded more personalized, visual tools.

Lösung

Zalando addressed these pain points by deploying a generative computer vision-powered virtual try-on solution, enabling users to upload selfies or use avatars to see realistic garment overlays tailored to their body shape and measurements . Leveraging machine learning models for pose estimation, body segmentation, and AI-generated rendering, the tool predicts optimal sizes and simulates draping effects, integrating with Zalando's ML platform for scalable personalization . The system combines computer vision (e.g., for landmark detection) with generative AI techniques to create hyper-realistic visualizations, drawing from vast datasets of product images, customer data, and 3D scans, ultimately aiming to cut returns while enhancing engagement . Piloted online and expanded to outlets, it forms part of Zalando's broader AI ecosystem including size predictors and style assistants.

Ergebnisse

  • 30,000+ customers used virtual fitting room shortly after launch
  • 5-10% projected reduction in return rates
  • Up to 21% fewer wrong-size returns via related AI size tools
  • Expanded to all physical outlets by 2023 for jeans category
  • Supports 27 million customers across 25 European markets
  • Part of AI strategy boosting personalization for 150,000+ products
Read case study →

Mayo Clinic

Healthcare

As a leading academic medical center, Mayo Clinic manages millions of patient records annually, but early detection of heart failure remains elusive. Traditional echocardiography detects low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <50%) only when symptomatic, missing asymptomatic cases that account for up to 50% of heart failure risks. Clinicians struggle with vast unstructured data, slowing retrieval of patient-specific insights and delaying decisions in high-stakes cardiology. Additionally, workforce shortages and rising costs exacerbate challenges, with cardiovascular diseases causing 17.9M deaths yearly globally. Manual ECG interpretation misses subtle patterns predictive of low EF, and sifting through electronic health records (EHRs) takes hours, hindering personalized medicine. Mayo needed scalable AI to transform reactive care into proactive prediction.

Lösung

Mayo Clinic deployed a deep learning ECG algorithm trained on over 1 million ECGs, identifying low LVEF from routine 10-second traces with high accuracy. This ML model extracts features invisible to humans, validated internally and externally. In parallel, a generative AI search tool via Google Cloud partnership accelerates EHR queries. Launched in 2023, it uses large language models (LLMs) for natural language searches, surfacing clinical insights instantly. Integrated into Mayo Clinic Platform, it supports 200+ AI initiatives. These solutions overcome data silos through federated learning and secure cloud infrastructure.

Ergebnisse

  • ECG AI AUC: 0.93 (internal), 0.92 (external validation)
  • Low EF detection sensitivity: 82% at 90% specificity
  • Asymptomatic low EF identified: 1.5% prevalence in screened population
  • GenAI search speed: 40% reduction in query time for clinicians
  • Model trained on: 1.1M ECGs from 44K patients
  • Deployment reach: Integrated in Mayo cardiology workflows since 2021
Read case study →

NVIDIA

Manufacturing

In semiconductor manufacturing, chip floorplanning—the task of arranging macros and circuitry on a die—is notoriously complex and NP-hard. Even expert engineers spend months iteratively refining layouts to balance power, performance, and area (PPA), navigating trade-offs like wirelength minimization, density constraints, and routability. Traditional tools struggle with the explosive combinatorial search space, especially for modern chips with millions of cells and hundreds of macros, leading to suboptimal designs and delayed time-to-market. NVIDIA faced this acutely while designing high-performance GPUs, where poor floorplans amplify power consumption and hinder AI accelerator efficiency. Manual processes limited scalability for 2.7 million cell designs with 320 macros, risking bottlenecks in their accelerated computing roadmap. Overcoming human-intensive trial-and-error was critical to sustain leadership in AI chips.

Lösung

NVIDIA deployed deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to model floorplanning as a sequential decision process: an agent places macros one-by-one, learning optimal policies via trial and error. Graph neural networks (GNNs) encode the chip as a graph, capturing spatial relationships and predicting placement impacts. The agent uses a policy network trained on benchmarks like MCNC and GSRC, with rewards penalizing half-perimeter wirelength (HPWL), congestion, and overlap. Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) enables efficient exploration, transferable across designs. This AI-driven approach automates what humans do manually but explores vastly more configurations.

Ergebnisse

  • Design Time: 3 hours for 2.7M cells vs. months manually
  • Chip Scale: 2.7 million cells, 320 macros optimized
  • PPA Improvement: Superior or comparable to human designs
  • Training Efficiency: Under 6 hours total for production layouts
  • Benchmark Success: Outperforms on MCNC/GSRC suites
  • Speedup: 10-30% faster circuits in related RL designs
Read case study →

Klarna

Fintech

Klarna, a leading fintech BNPL provider, faced enormous pressure from millions of customer service inquiries across multiple languages for its 150 million users worldwide. Queries spanned complex fintech issues like refunds, returns, order tracking, and payments, requiring high accuracy, regulatory compliance, and 24/7 availability. Traditional human agents couldn't scale efficiently, leading to long wait times averaging 11 minutes per resolution and rising costs. Additionally, providing personalized shopping advice at scale was challenging, as customers expected conversational, context-aware guidance across retail partners. Multilingual support was critical in markets like US, Europe, and beyond, but hiring multilingual agents was costly and slow. This bottleneck hindered growth and customer satisfaction in a competitive BNPL sector.

Lösung

Klarna partnered with OpenAI to deploy a generative AI chatbot powered by GPT-4, customized as a multilingual customer service assistant. The bot handles refunds, returns, order issues, and acts as a conversational shopping advisor, integrated seamlessly into Klarna's app and website. Key innovations included fine-tuning on Klarna's data, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) for real-time policy access, and safeguards for fintech compliance. It supports dozens of languages, escalating complex cases to humans while learning from interactions. This AI-native approach enabled rapid scaling without proportional headcount growth.

Ergebnisse

  • 2/3 of all customer service chats handled by AI
  • 2.3 million conversations in first month alone
  • Resolution time: 11 minutes → 2 minutes (82% reduction)
  • CSAT: 4.4/5 (AI) vs. 4.2/5 (humans)
  • $40 million annual cost savings
  • Equivalent to 700 full-time human agents
  • 80%+ queries resolved without human intervention
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Turn Training Assets into a Gemini-Indexed Knowledge Base

The first tactical step is to give Gemini access to the right learning materials. Collect slide decks, e-learnings, SOPs, FAQs, recorded webinars, and policy documents related to a specific topic (e.g. onboarding or a new product). Clean out outdated content and group assets into logical domains, such as “Sales Basics”, “Leadership Foundations”, or “HR Policies”.

Work with IT to connect Gemini to your document repositories or LMS content library. Use metadata or folder structures to signal which sources are authoritative. This allows Gemini to retrieve and synthesize answers from your own materials rather than hallucinating. The more clearly you scope the initial domain, the better the quality of the responses employees will see.

Example internal guideline for content scope:
Domain: Customer Service Onboarding
Authoritative sources:
- /LMS/Onboarding/CustomerService/**
- /KnowledgeBase/ServicePlaybooks/**
- /Policies/CustomerCommunication/**
Non-authoritative (exclude):
- /Archive/**
- /Drafts/**

Expected outcome: Employees can query Gemini for clarifications and refreshers that are consistent with your current training content, reducing confusion and reliance on ad-hoc interpretations.

Embed Gemini Microlearning in the Flow of Work

To fight poor knowledge retention, employees must revisit key concepts shortly after training and at spaced intervals. Configure Gemini to generate microlearning units – short summaries, scenario questions, and quick quizzes – that can be delivered via email, chat, or LMS notifications over several weeks.

Use prompts that convert long-form training materials into concise, role-specific reinforcements. For example, after a leadership training, create weekly “Leadership Moments” nudges that ask managers to apply one concept in their next 1:1.

Example Gemini prompt for microlearning:
You are an L&D microlearning designer.
Input: Full transcript of our "Coaching Skills for Managers" workshop.
Task:
1. Extract the 8 most important coaching techniques.
2. For each technique, create a 150-word recap and a realistic scenario question.
3. Format each as a standalone microlearning unit suitable for a weekly email.
Audience: First-time people managers in our company.

Expected outcome: Regular, lightweight touchpoints that strengthen recall and support behavior change without overwhelming employees.

Create Role-Based Adaptive Learning Paths

Use Gemini to move beyond one-size-fits-all curricula by generating adaptive learning paths based on role, prior knowledge, and performance data. Start by defining skill profiles for key roles (e.g. sales rep, team lead, HR business partner) and mapping existing learning assets to specific skills or competencies.

Then prompt Gemini to propose learning sequences tailored to different starting levels. Integrate basic assessment results (quiz scores, manager ratings, self-assessments) so the system can shorten or expand paths depending on what people already know.

Example Gemini prompt for path design:
You are an L&D architect.
Input:
- Role: Inside Sales Representative
- Skills: product knowledge, objection handling, discovery questions
- Content: list of modules with duration and skill tags
- Learner profile: strong product knowledge, weak objection handling
Task:
Design a 4-week learning path (2 hours/week) that:
- Minimizes time on product basics
- Emphasizes objection handling practice and feedback
- Includes weekly reinforcement activities
Output: List of modules and activities with sequence and rationale.

Expected outcome: Employees spend more time on their actual gaps, which increases engagement and retention while reducing time wasted on known material.

Deploy a Just-in-Time HR & L&D Assistant in Your LMS or Chat

Gemini can serve as a just-in-time learning assistant where employees ask questions and get answers grounded in your training catalog and HR policies. Integrate Gemini into your LMS interface or collaboration tools as a chatbot that understands natural language queries like “How do I handle a difficult feedback conversation?” or “What’s the process for approving parental leave?”

Configure the assistant to respond with short, practical answers and direct links to the most relevant training or policy pages. This not only helps employees in the moment of need but also continually drives them back to your official learning resources.

Example Gemini system prompt for HR/L&D assistant:
You are an internal HR and learning assistant for <Company>.
Use only the company documents and training materials you have access to.
For each question:
1. Provide a concise, actionable answer.
2. Link to 1-3 relevant internal resources (courses, PDFs, policies).
3. If the question is out of scope or sensitive, explain why and suggest
   contacting HR directly.
Never invent company policies. If unsure, say so and escalate.

Expected outcome: Fewer repeated questions to HR and managers, faster access to accurate information, and constant reinforcement of training content at the exact moment employees need it.

Generate Personalized Recap Materials After Training Sessions

Immediately after a workshop or virtual training, use Gemini to create personalized recap packs for participants. Feed in attendance lists, chat logs, Q&A content, and the original training material. Gemini can automatically highlight the most discussed topics, common misunderstandings, and critical frameworks.

From this, generate short recap documents, checklists, and application tasks that are tailored to different groups (e.g. managers vs. individual contributors). Include reflection questions and “first 3 actions” prompts to encourage immediate application.

Example Gemini prompt for recaps:
You are a corporate learning coach.
Input:
- Slides and facilitator notes from "Effective 1:1s" training
- Chat + Q&A transcript
Task:
1. Summarize the 5 most important practices covered.
2. Identify the top 5 recurring questions or challenges.
3. Create a 2-page recap for participants including:
   - Key practices in bullet points
   - Answers to common questions
   - A 30-day action plan with weekly focus areas
Audience: People managers who attended today's session.

Expected outcome: Participants leave with concise, practical materials they can revisit, which significantly improves retention versus relying on memory or full slide decks.

Measure Retention and Behavior Change, Not Just Completion

To prove impact, tie Gemini-enabled learning flows to retention and performance metrics. Use spaced quizzes, scenario evaluations, or short reflection prompts generated by Gemini and delivered 2–8 weeks after training. Compare results to baseline cohorts without AI-supported reinforcement.

Where possible, connect these measures to operational data: error rates, customer satisfaction scores, ticket resolution times, or time-to-productivity for new hires. Gemini can help you analyze open-text feedback from participants and managers to identify patterns in what’s sticking and where people still struggle.

Example Gemini prompt for evaluation design:
You are an L&D measurement specialist.
Input:
- Description of a new onboarding program
- List of available metrics (NPS, errors, time-to-productivity)
Task:
1. Propose 5 indicators of knowledge retention and behavior change.
2. Design 3 spaced micro-assessments (2, 4, 8 weeks post-training).
3. Suggest how to combine these with operational data to show ROI.

Expected outcome: A realistic analytics framework that demonstrates improved knowledge retention and supports data-driven decisions about which learning initiatives to scale or redesign.

Across these practices, companies typically see more engaged learners, fewer repeated basic questions, faster ramp-up in key roles, and higher consistency in how policies and processes are applied. While specific numbers depend on your baseline, it is realistic to target a 20–40% improvement in post-training quiz scores after 4–8 weeks and noticeable reductions in avoidable errors in areas covered by Gemini-supported learning.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini improves knowledge retention by turning one-off trainings into ongoing, personalized reinforcement. It indexes your internal learning content and HR documentation, then generates microlearning, quizzes, and recap materials that are delivered over time instead of just on the training day.

Employees can also use Gemini via chat or your LMS as a just-in-time assistant, asking questions when they need to apply what they learned. This combination of spaced repetition, adaptive learning paths, and on-demand support helps employees remember and use training content in real work situations.

You don’t need a perfect L&D ecosystem, but a few foundations are important. First, you need access to your existing training materials, SOPs, policies, and FAQs in digital form so Gemini can index them. Second, you should have clarity on which topics or roles you want to start with (e.g. onboarding, leadership basics, safety procedures).

On the technical side, IT should confirm where Gemini can safely connect (LMS, document storage, intranet) and how access rights are managed. From a people perspective, it helps to have one HR/L&D owner and one business stakeholder to co-define success metrics. Reruption typically structures this setup phase as a short, focused sprint before building the first prototype.

Initial impact can be seen relatively quickly if you focus on a narrow use case. Within 4–6 weeks, you can have Gemini indexing a defined set of learning assets, delivering microlearning, and answering just-in-time questions in a pilot area (for example, a single department or cohort).

Meaningful retention and behavior change signals typically show up over 8–12 weeks, when you compare post-training quizzes, error rates, or onboarding ramp-up times to previous cohorts. The key is to define a clear baseline, set realistic KPIs, and let at least one full reinforcement cycle (several weeks of spaced learning) run before judging results.

Costs fall into three buckets: the Gemini usage itself, integration/engineering work, and HR/L&D time for content curation and change management. Compared to building custom software from scratch, this is usually lean – Gemini provides the core AI capabilities, and your main investment is in integrating it into your environment and processes.

ROI comes from several sources: reduced time-to-productivity for new hires, fewer errors in processes covered by training, lower volume of repetitive HR queries, and better use of existing training content. When knowledge retention improves, you often need fewer full retrainings and can focus budget on targeted upskilling. With a well-chosen pilot, it’s realistic to build a quantitative business case within the first 3–6 months.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur, meaning we don’t just advise – we build and ship solutions with you. For Gemini-based learning support, we typically start with our AI PoC offering (9,900€) to validate a concrete use case such as onboarding or a specific training program. This includes scoping, feasibility checks, a working prototype, and a production roadmap.

Beyond the PoC, our team supports you with integration into your LMS or HR stack, content structuring, guardrail design, and enablement of HR and L&D teams. We bring the AI engineering depth to make Gemini work reliably with your data, and the strategic L&D perspective to ensure the solution actually improves knowledge retention and performance instead of becoming another unused tool.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media