The Challenge: Manual Working-Capital Assumptions

Most finance teams still anchor their cash forecasts on a handful of manually set assumptions: Days Sales Outstanding (DSO), Days Payables Outstanding (DPO) and inventory turns. These numbers usually live in a single tab of a spreadsheet, are updated once per quarter at best, and then drive millions in funding, investment and liquidity decisions. The problem: real payment behaviour, supplier terms and inventory dynamics change weekly, not annually.

Traditional approaches were built for stability, not for the volatility and complexity of today’s markets. Spreadsheets with hard‑coded working-capital drivers can’t keep up with shifting customer cohorts, promotional campaigns, supply chain disruptions or evolving discount policies. Even when finance adds more detail, the result is an explosion of manual maintenance, VLOOKUPs and error‑prone overrides. ERP reports help a bit, but they are backward‑looking snapshots, not forward‑looking models of actual cash movements.

The impact is substantial. Static DSO/DPO/inventory assumptions systematically over‑ or underestimate future cash, causing weak liquidity planning, unnecessary credit lines, late reactions to cash crunches and missed investment opportunities. Treasury runs conservative buffers “just in case”, operations get mixed signals on working‑capital targets, and the CFO spends too much time explaining forecast deviations instead of steering the business. Competitors that react faster to cash signals win on pricing flexibility, M&A readiness and resilience in downturns.

This challenge is very real, but it is also highly solvable. With today’s AI, especially models like Gemini integrated into Sheets and BigQuery, finance teams can infer up‑to‑date payment patterns directly from transaction data, automate working‑capital assumptions and refresh cash forecasts continuously. At Reruption, we’ve seen how embedding AI into core financial workflows transforms decision speed and quality. In the sections below, you’ll find practical guidance on how to get there – step by step, with a clear path from your current spreadsheets to AI‑enhanced cash forecasting.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s perspective, the real opportunity is not a shiny new forecasting tool, but using Gemini on top of your existing finance data stack to continuously learn and update working‑capital drivers. Because Gemini integrates natively with Google Sheets and BigQuery, it can sit where your finance team already works, infer dynamic DSO, DPO and inventory patterns from real transactions, and feed them straight back into your cash forecasting model. Our hands-on experience building AI solutions shows that this combination of embedded AI and finance ownership is what turns static assumptions into a living, data-driven system.

Anchor on Business Questions, Not on the Algorithm

Before you think about models and prompts, define the core decisions your cash forecasting must support. Is the priority to reduce reliance on short-term credit, to plan investments with more confidence, or to avoid breaching covenants? Each goal implies different granularity: a bank covenant view might focus on weekly net cash positions, while investment planning needs scenario simulations over quarters. Clarifying this up front prevents you from building an AI that is technically impressive but operationally irrelevant.

With Gemini, it’s tempting to ask for "better forecasts" in general. Instead, structure questions such as, “Given our last 18 months of AR data, what is the probability distribution of collections for invoices older than 45 days by key customer segment?” This mindset ensures that AI‑derived working-capital drivers directly answer material business questions and not just produce more numbers.

Treat AI-Assisted DSO/DPO as a Living Policy, Not a One-Off Project

Static DSO/DPO assumptions are attractive because they feel final. An AI‑assisted approach with Gemini is different: you are effectively creating a living policy that adapts as customer and supplier behaviour changes. Strategically, this means finance leadership must accept that working-capital assumptions will move more frequently, and that this is a strength, not a loss of control.

Design governance for this from day one. Decide who approves major shifts in model‑suggested DSO/DPO, how often to review them, and how to communicate changes to business units. When AI updates are treated as managed policy adjustments, you avoid the perception of a “black box” and instead position Gemini as an intelligent assistant inside your existing control framework.

Prepare Data Ownership and Finance–IT Collaboration

Gemini can only infer high‑quality payment patterns if your transaction histories, customer master data and vendor terms are reasonably complete and accessible. Strategically, this requires clear ownership between finance, IT and data teams: who curates AR/AP data in BigQuery, who controls access, and who is accountable for data quality issues that impact forecasts.

Use the introduction of Gemini as a catalyst to define this ownership. For example, finance might own the logic of segmentation (by region, industry, payment term), while IT owns the pipelines into BigQuery. This division allows Gemini to be deployed quickly while minimising security and compliance risk – themes we prioritise in every Reruption engagement.

Start with Narrow, High-Impact Use Cases

Instead of trying to overhaul your entire cash forecasting process in one go, identify narrow use cases where Gemini can prove value quickly. Typical candidates include predicting collections for late‑paying customer segments, forecasting disbursements for a specific supplier group, or dynamically adjusting DPO for critical vendors with early-payment discounts.

This strategic focus reduces resistance and allows your team to build trust in AI outputs. Once the organisation sees that Gemini can, for instance, cut forecast variance for a specific AR portfolio by a meaningful margin, it becomes far easier to extend the approach to full working-capital coverage.

Build Risk Controls and Stress Scenarios Around the AI

Finance leaders rightly worry about relying blindly on models. Strategically, Gemini should be introduced with explicit risk mitigation measures: compare its suggested DSO/DPO to legacy assumptions, enforce guardrails (e.g. maximum allowed change per month), and build stress scenarios that deliberately challenge the AI’s baseline.

For example, you can ask Gemini to simulate cash impacts if a top customer cohort suddenly extends payment behaviour by 15 days, or if a key supplier tightens terms. This positions AI not as a single source of truth, but as a powerful engine for scenario thinking – something auditors and boards are more comfortable with, and something that strengthens, rather than weakens, your control environment.

Used thoughtfully, Gemini can turn DSO, DPO and inventory from static spreadsheet inputs into dynamic, data-driven levers that materially improve cash forecasting accuracy. The real value comes when finance owns the questions and governance, while AI quietly maintains the assumptions in the background. Reruption’s combination of AI engineering depth and a Co‑Preneur mindset allows us to embed these capabilities directly in your Sheets and BigQuery environment, so they become part of how your team works every day. If you want to explore how Gemini could cleanly replace manual working-capital assumptions in your context, we’re ready to co-design and validate a concrete approach with you.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Wealth Management to Apparel Retail: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Citibank Hong Kong

Wealth Management

Citibank Hong Kong faced growing demand for advanced personal finance management tools accessible via mobile devices. Customers sought predictive insights into budgeting, investing, and financial tracking, but traditional apps lacked personalization and real-time interactivity. In a competitive retail banking landscape, especially in wealth management, clients expected seamless, proactive advice amid volatile markets and rising digital expectations in Asia. Key challenges included integrating vast customer data for accurate forecasts, ensuring conversational interfaces felt natural, and overcoming data privacy hurdles in Hong Kong's regulated environment. Early mobile tools showed low engagement, with users abandoning apps due to generic recommendations, highlighting the need for AI-driven personalization to retain high-net-worth individuals.

Lösung

Wealth 360 emerged as Citibank HK's AI-powered personal finance manager, embedded in the Citi Mobile app. It leverages predictive analytics to forecast spending patterns, investment returns, and portfolio risks, delivering personalized recommendations via a conversational interface like chatbots. Drawing from Citi's global AI expertise, it processes transaction data, market trends, and user behavior for tailored advice on budgeting and wealth growth. Implementation involved machine learning models for personalization and natural language processing (NLP) for intuitive chats, building on Citi's prior successes like Asia-Pacific chatbots and APIs. This solution addressed gaps by enabling proactive alerts and virtual consultations, enhancing customer experience without human intervention.

Ergebnisse

  • 30% increase in mobile app engagement metrics
  • 25% improvement in wealth management service retention
  • 40% faster response times via conversational AI
  • 85% customer satisfaction score for personalized insights
  • 18M+ API calls processed in similar Citi initiatives
  • 50% reduction in manual advisory queries
Read case study →

BP

Energy

BP, a global energy leader in oil, gas, and renewables, grappled with high energy costs during peak periods across its extensive assets. Volatile grid demands and price spikes during high-consumption times strained operations, exacerbating inefficiencies in energy production and consumption. Integrating intermittent renewable sources added forecasting challenges, while traditional management failed to dynamically respond to real-time market signals, leading to substantial financial losses and grid instability risks . Compounding this, BP's diverse portfolio—from offshore platforms to data-heavy exploration—faced data silos and legacy systems ill-equipped for predictive analytics. Peak energy expenses not only eroded margins but hindered the transition to sustainable operations amid rising regulatory pressures for emissions reduction. The company needed a solution to shift loads intelligently and monetize flexibility in energy markets .

Lösung

To tackle these issues, BP acquired Open Energi in 2021, gaining access to its flagship Plato AI platform, which employs machine learning for predictive analytics and real-time optimization. Plato analyzes vast datasets from assets, weather, and grid signals to forecast peaks and automate demand response, shifting non-critical loads to off-peak times while participating in frequency response services . Integrated into BP's operations, the AI enables dynamic containment and flexibility markets, optimizing consumption without disrupting production. Combined with BP's internal AI for exploration and simulation, it provides end-to-end visibility, reducing reliance on fossil fuels during peaks and enhancing renewable integration . This acquisition marked a strategic pivot, blending Open Energi's demand-side expertise with BP's supply-side scale.

Ergebnisse

  • $10 million in annual energy savings
  • 80+ MW of energy assets under flexible management
  • Strongest oil exploration performance in years via AI
  • Material boost in electricity demand optimization
  • Reduced peak grid costs through dynamic response
  • Enhanced asset efficiency across oil, gas, renewables
Read case study →

John Deere

Agriculture

In conventional agriculture, farmers rely on blanket spraying of herbicides across entire fields, leading to significant waste. This approach applies chemicals indiscriminately to crops and weeds alike, resulting in high costs for inputs—herbicides can account for 10-20% of variable farming expenses—and environmental harm through soil contamination, water runoff, and accelerated weed resistance . Globally, weeds cause up to 34% yield losses, but overuse of herbicides exacerbates resistance in over 500 species, threatening food security . For row crops like cotton, corn, and soybeans, distinguishing weeds from crops is particularly challenging due to visual similarities, varying field conditions (light, dust, speed), and the need for real-time decisions at 15 mph spraying speeds. Labor shortages and rising chemical prices in 2025 further pressured farmers, with U.S. herbicide costs exceeding $6B annually . Traditional methods failed to balance efficacy, cost, and sustainability.

Lösung

See & Spray revolutionizes weed control by integrating high-resolution cameras, AI-powered computer vision, and precision nozzles on sprayers. The system captures images every few inches, uses object detection models to identify weeds (over 77 species) versus crops in milliseconds, and activates sprays only on targets—reducing blanket application . John Deere acquired Blue River Technology in 2017 to accelerate development, training models on millions of annotated images for robust performance across conditions. Available in Premium (high-density) and Select (affordable retrofit) versions, it integrates with existing John Deere equipment via edge computing for real-time inference without cloud dependency . This robotic precision minimizes drift and overlap, aligning with sustainability goals.

Ergebnisse

  • 5 million acres treated in 2025
  • 31 million gallons of herbicide mix saved
  • Nearly 50% reduction in non-residual herbicide use
  • 77+ weed species detected accurately
  • Up to 90% less chemical in clean crop areas
  • ROI within 1-2 seasons for adopters
Read case study →

Morgan Stanley

Banking

Financial advisors at Morgan Stanley struggled with rapid access to the firm's extensive proprietary research database, comprising over 350,000 documents spanning decades of institutional knowledge. Manual searches through this vast repository were time-intensive, often taking 30 minutes or more per query, hindering advisors' ability to deliver timely, personalized advice during client interactions . This bottleneck limited scalability in wealth management, where high-net-worth clients demand immediate, data-driven insights amid volatile markets. Additionally, the sheer volume of unstructured data—40 million words of research reports—made it challenging to synthesize relevant information quickly, risking suboptimal recommendations and reduced client satisfaction. Advisors needed a solution to democratize access to this 'goldmine' of intelligence without extensive training or technical expertise .

Lösung

Morgan Stanley partnered with OpenAI to develop AI @ Morgan Stanley Debrief, a GPT-4-powered generative AI chatbot tailored for wealth management advisors. The tool uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to securely query the firm's proprietary research database, providing instant, context-aware responses grounded in verified sources . Implemented as a conversational assistant, Debrief allows advisors to ask natural-language questions like 'What are the risks of investing in AI stocks?' and receive synthesized answers with citations, eliminating manual digging. Rigorous AI evaluations and human oversight ensure accuracy, with custom fine-tuning to align with Morgan Stanley's institutional knowledge . This approach overcame data silos and enabled seamless integration into advisors' workflows.

Ergebnisse

  • 98% adoption rate among wealth management advisors
  • Access for nearly 50% of Morgan Stanley's total employees
  • Queries answered in seconds vs. 30+ minutes manually
  • Over 350,000 proprietary research documents indexed
  • 60% employee access at peers like JPMorgan for comparison
  • Significant productivity gains reported by CAO
Read case study →

AT&T

Telecommunications

As a leading telecom operator, AT&T manages one of the world's largest and most complex networks, spanning millions of cell sites, fiber optics, and 5G infrastructure. The primary challenges included inefficient network planning and optimization, such as determining optimal cell site placement and spectrum acquisition amid exploding data demands from 5G rollout and IoT growth. Traditional methods relied on manual analysis, leading to suboptimal resource allocation and higher capital expenditures. Additionally, reactive network maintenance caused frequent outages, with anomaly detection lagging behind real-time needs. Detecting and fixing issues proactively was critical to minimize downtime, but vast data volumes from network sensors overwhelmed legacy systems. This resulted in increased operational costs, customer dissatisfaction, and delayed 5G deployment. AT&T needed scalable AI to predict failures, automate healing, and forecast demand accurately.

Lösung

AT&T integrated machine learning and predictive analytics through its AT&T Labs, developing models for network design including spectrum refarming and cell site optimization. AI algorithms analyze geospatial data, traffic patterns, and historical performance to recommend ideal tower locations, reducing build costs. For operations, anomaly detection and self-healing systems use predictive models on NFV (Network Function Virtualization) to forecast failures and automate fixes, like rerouting traffic. Causal AI extends beyond correlations for root-cause analysis in churn and network issues. Implementation involved edge-to-edge intelligence, deploying AI across 100,000+ engineers' workflows.

Ergebnisse

  • Billions of dollars saved in network optimization costs
  • 20-30% improvement in network utilization and efficiency
  • Significant reduction in truck rolls and manual interventions
  • Proactive detection of anomalies preventing major outages
  • Optimized cell site placement reducing CapEx by millions
  • Enhanced 5G forecasting accuracy by up to 40%
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Connect BigQuery AR/AP Tables and Build a Clean History

Effective automation of working-capital assumptions starts with a reliable transaction history. Use your data team or a lightweight ETL to load AR and AP ledger data into BigQuery: invoice IDs, issue dates, due dates, payment dates, amounts, customer/vendor IDs, currencies and payment terms. Standardise field names and ensure timestamp formats are consistent. This provides Gemini with the raw material to infer real DSO/DPO rather than relying on static term tables.

Once the base tables are in BigQuery, create curated views: for example, a view that calculates days-to-pay for each invoice and tags it with customer segment, business unit and region. Gemini can then query these views to detect patterns such as “customers in segment A with 30-day terms actually pay in 42 days on average”. The better you structure these views, the simpler and more repeatable your AI prompts and workflows become.

Use Gemini in Sheets to Generate Dynamic DSO/DPO by Segment

With your history in place, set up a Google Sheet that pulls summary data from BigQuery (e.g. via Connected Sheets). Organise rows by customer/vendor segment and columns for metrics like historical average days-to-pay, weighted by invoice value, over different lookback windows (3, 6, 12 months). Then use Gemini in Sheets to translate that history into dynamic DSO/DPO assumptions for your forecast model.

You can prompt Gemini directly in a cell or via an Apps Script call. For example:

Example prompt for Gemini (cell note or script context):
You are assisting a finance team with working-capital forecasting.
We provide historical days-to-pay data by customer segment.
Task:
- Calculate a recommended DSO by segment
- Use a 70/30 weighting between the last 3 months and the prior 9 months
- Flag any segment where behaviour has shifted by >10 days vs the last forecast.
Return a table with columns:
- Segment
- Recommended_DSO
- Change_vs_Prior_Forecast
- Comment_on_Driver (e.g. seasonality, outlier invoices, new terms)

Link the "Recommended_DSO" column directly into your cash-flow model. This removes manual updates while keeping the logic transparent for controllers and auditors.

Forecast Collections and Disbursements on a Daily/Weekly Basis

Once DSO/DPO are dynamic, extend Gemini’s role to forecasting actual collections and disbursements. Use BigQuery to generate expected cash events: each open invoice with an expected payment date based on the AI‑enhanced days-to-pay pattern. Then re-aggregate these into daily or weekly buckets. Gemini can help refine this projection by adjusting for seasonality, known campaigns or upcoming price changes.

A practical pattern is to export the projected cash buckets into Sheets and ask Gemini to refine and annotate them:

Example prompt:
You are helping to refine a short-term cash collection forecast.
Sheet range A2:E100 contains:
- Bucket_Start_Date
- Bucket_End_Date
- Expected_Collections_Base (EUR)
- Segment
- Historic_Collection_Volatility (standard deviation %)
Tasks:
1) Adjust Expected_Collections_Base for known seasonality based on the last 3 years.
2) Add a column Adjusted_Collections.
3) Add a Comment column explaining major adjustments (>5%).
Assume:
- Strong seasonality for B2C segments around November-December.
- Slight slowdown for B2B in August.
Return the updated table.

Feed the "Adjusted_Collections" back into your cash forecast to get a more realistic short-term liquidity view.

Automate Inventory-Related Cash Assumptions

Inventory is often left as a crude assumption in forecasting models. Use Gemini to refine inventory-driven cash flows by combining sales, purchase orders and stock-level data from BigQuery. Start with a table that shows, by product category and region, historical days of inventory on hand and gross margin. Then prompt Gemini to recommend safety stock and reorder patterns that balance service levels and cash tied up in inventory.

For instance:

Example prompt:
You are supporting inventory-related cash forecasting.
We provide a table with columns:
Category, Region, Avg_Days_Inventory, Stockout_Events, Gross_Margin.
Tasks:
1) Propose a target Days_Inventory for each Category/Region that:
   - Reduces current Avg_Days_Inventory by 10-20% where Stockout_Events are rare.
   - Keeps or increases inventory where Stockout_Events are frequent and Gross_Margin is high.
2) Estimate the cash impact (in EUR) of moving from current to target Days_Inventory,
   assuming cost of goods as provided in column COGS_per_Day.
3) Return a table with Target_Days_Inventory and Estimated_Cash_Release.

Translate the "Estimated_Cash_Release" into phased monthly impacts in your cash-flow forecast, and align with operations on realistic implementation timelines.

Embed Alerts and Scenario Buttons for Finance Users

To move beyond one-off analysis, embed Gemini into your daily cash monitoring. In Sheets, create simple "Scenario" buttons (using Apps Script) that call Gemini with different assumptions: for example, “Economic Slowdown”, “Aggressive Collections”, or “Supplier Tightening”. Each button triggers a recalculation of DSO, DPO and inventory impacts under that scenario and writes results into dedicated columns or tabs.

Additionally, have Gemini generate alert narratives when leading indicators change. A daily or weekly job can query BigQuery for shifts in days-to-pay or overdue buckets and ask Gemini to summarise the risk:

Example prompt for an automated alert summary:
You receive aggregated AR/AP metrics for the last week vs the prior 4-week average.
Tasks:
1) Identify material changes in customer payment behaviour (e.g. +5 days in a major segment).
2) Identify suppliers where average payment timing has shifted.
3) Summarise cash risk or opportunity over the next 8 weeks.
4) Provide 3 concrete actions for the finance team.
Output a concise email-style summary.

Send this summary to treasury and the CFO, so AI is continuously highlighting where working-capital assumptions are drifting away from reality.

Track KPIs to Validate and Tune the AI-Assisted Forecast

To make Gemini a trusted part of your liquidity planning, define and monitor a small set of KPIs. At minimum, track: forecast error for net cash by week, forecast error for collections by major segment, and the variance between AI‑recommended and actual realised DSO/DPO. Use BigQuery to calculate these KPIs automatically and store time series for trend analysis.

Periodically involve Gemini to analyse these KPI series and suggest model adjustments, such as changing lookback windows, segregating additional customer cohorts or excluding known one-off events. Over time, you should see forecast variance decrease and the need for manual overrides shrink. Many organisations can realistically aim for 20–40% improvement in short-term cash forecast accuracy and a significant reduction in manual assumption maintenance effort once these practices are in place.

Expected outcome: a more responsive cash forecasting process, fewer emergency liquidity measures, and a finance team that spends less time massaging assumptions and more time acting on early cash signals.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini improves DSO and DPO assumptions by learning directly from your transaction history instead of relying on static averages. Using BigQuery data, it analyses invoice issue dates, due dates, payment dates and customer or supplier segments to infer real payment patterns over different time windows. It can then recommend segment-specific DSO/DPO values, highlight where behaviour has recently shifted, and push those recommendations back into Google Sheets where your cash-flow model lives.

In practice, this means your assumptions continuously reflect current behaviour — for example, if a key customer cohort has started paying 7 days later, or if you’re systematically stretching payments to a non-critical supplier. The finance team remains in control, but the manual spreadsheet work and guesswork are largely removed.

You don’t need a large data science team to get value from Gemini in finance, but a few capabilities are important. First, you need access to AR/AP, sales and vendor term data in a structured form – ideally in BigQuery or a similar warehouse. Second, you need someone comfortable with Google Sheets (controllers, FP&A, or treasury analysts typically fit) who can work with Connected Sheets and basic formulas.

From there, Gemini’s natural language interface does a lot of the heavy lifting. For more advanced automation and scheduled runs, light support from IT or a data engineer helps – for setting up data pipelines, scripts and access controls. Reruption usually works directly with finance and one technical counterpart to stand up a working solution quickly, then upskills the finance team to own the process.

Timelines depend on your data readiness, but many organisations can see meaningful improvements in cash forecast accuracy within 6–10 weeks. The first 2–3 weeks typically focus on connecting AR/AP data to BigQuery, cleaning obvious quality issues, and defining the segmentation that matters for your business (e.g. regions, customer types, key supplier groups).

Weeks 3–6 are usually enough to deploy Gemini in Sheets, generate AI‑assisted DSO/DPO assumptions and wire them into your existing forecast model. From there, you can start tracking variance and tuning the approach. More advanced use cases – like automated scenario simulations or inventory-related cash modelling – can be layered on over the following months without disrupting the core process.

From a tooling perspective, Gemini’s cost is relatively modest compared to the financial impact of better working-capital management. The main investments are time to connect your data and redesign some of the forecasting workflow. ROI typically comes from three areas: fewer surprises in short-term liquidity (reducing emergency credit usage), lower cash buffers because forecasts are more reliable, and productivity gains from eliminating manual assumption maintenance.

While exact figures depend on your size and sector, it’s common to see reduced forecast variance by 20–40% and measurable reductions in working capital tied up, even in the first year. We recommend treating the first implementation as a focused pilot with clear KPIs so that you can quantify ROI before rolling out more broadly.

Reruption supports you end-to-end, from scoping the use case to shipping a working solution. With our AI PoC offering (9,900€), we first validate that Gemini can reliably infer your DSO, DPO and key working-capital drivers from existing data – including model selection, architecture and performance metrics. You get a functioning prototype running on your Google Sheets/BigQuery stack, not just a slide deck.

Beyond the PoC, our Co-Preneur approach means we embed with your finance and data teams like co-founders: designing governance, automating workflows, setting up risk controls and training your people to own the AI-enabled forecasting process. We focus on fast engineering and real outcomes, so that Gemini becomes a durable capability in your cash forecasting, not a one-off experiment.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media