The Challenge: Weak Scenario Planning

Most finance teams are expected to be strategic partners, yet their scenario planning still relies on static spreadsheets and a handful of simplistic cases. Building each scenario means copying models, changing assumptions by hand and reconciling broken formulas. As a result, finance can only afford to simulate a few variants and is forced to oversimplify complex drivers such as demand shifts, price changes or supply disruptions.

Traditional approaches struggle because they were designed for annual budgeting, not for dynamic, driver-based planning. Every new scenario requires days of manual work across multiple files and versions. Key assumptions live in email threads or PowerPoint decks instead of being encoded in the model. Linking external data (market indicators, FX, interest rates, commodity prices) is cumbersome, so most teams ignore it. By the time a new scenario is built, the underlying data has often already changed.

The business impact of this weak scenario planning is significant. Companies react slowly to shocks in demand, prices or supply because finance cannot quantify options quickly enough. Strategic choices such as entering a new market, adjusting pricing or changing the go-to-market model are debated on intuition instead of robust, multi-scenario analysis. This leads to misallocated capital, missed opportunities, over- or under-hiring and a persistent competitive disadvantage against organisations that can simulate decisions in days, not months.

The good news: this is a solvable problem. Modern AI for financial planning can learn from your historicals, drivers and live operational data to generate and update scenarios in minutes. At Reruption, we have repeatedly helped organisations move from static spreadsheets to AI-first models that support real decision-making speed. In the rest of this guide, you will see how to use Gemini together with Sheets, Docs and BI tools to build scalable, trustworthy scenario planning without throwing away your current finance stack.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption's work building AI-first financial workflows, we see Gemini as a practical accelerator rather than a magic black box. Used well, Gemini for scenario planning turns your existing Sheets models and BI dashboards into dynamic tools: it understands your revenue and cost drivers, proposes scenario structures, generates sensitivity tables and explains impacts in plain language. The key is to frame Gemini as a co-pilot embedded into your finance processes, not an external toy that sits next to them.

Anchor Gemini in a Driver-Based Planning Framework

AI cannot fix a fundamentally unclear planning model. Before you lean on Gemini for financial planning, make sure your revenue and cost structures are expressed as clear, driver-based formulas in Sheets or your planning tool. Define explicit links between volume, price, mix, channel, headcount and capacity. Gemini is extremely effective at exploring permutations across these drivers – but only if they are visible and structured.

Strategically, this means treating the move to AI as an opportunity to clean up your model rather than automate chaos. Start by identifying 10–15 core business drivers and standardising how they are represented (naming conventions, units, time buckets). Once these are consistent, Gemini can help you generate coherent scenario sets such as “demand shock + FX swing + supplier failure” instead of random combinations of cell changes.

Use Gemini to Expand the Scenario Space, Not Decide the Strategy

A common misconception is that AI should decide which scenario is most likely or which strategy to choose. In reality, Gemini in finance is strongest at expanding your field of view: it can quickly create dozens of internally consistent scenarios, stress-test assumptions and surface non-obvious combinations. Human leadership still decides what risks to accept and what moves to make.

Frame Gemini as a generator and explainer. For example, you can ask it to propose scenario sets for “severe but plausible” demand shocks or to map how a 2% price change cascades through contribution margin and cash flow. This keeps accountability clear: finance and management own decisions; Gemini helps them see the landscape faster and more completely.

Prepare Your Team for an Iterative, Conversational Planning Cycle

Weak scenario planning is often cultural, not just technical. Teams are used to one big annual budget and occasional re-forecasts. With AI-driven scenario modelling, planning becomes an ongoing conversation: you ask questions, Gemini generates views, and you refine assumptions in shorter cycles. This demands a mindset shift from “we must be exactly right once” to “we must be roughly right and update often”.

Invest in basic AI literacy for your finance team so they know how to interrogate models, challenge outputs and iterate. Encourage analysts and business partners to treat Gemini as a counterpart: they should ask it to explain drivers, reconcile scenarios and highlight where data is thin. Over time, this conversational way of planning becomes normal and significantly reduces the effort to keep scenarios up to date.

Design Guardrails and Governance Before Scaling

Introducing Gemini into financial planning also introduces new risks: inappropriate assumptions, data privacy issues or misinterpretation of AI-generated commentary. To mitigate this, define clear guardrails early. Decide what data Gemini can access (e.g. anonymised transaction data vs. full GL), who can create or change scenario templates, and how AI outputs are reviewed before they enter management presentations.

Strategically, set up a lightweight governance loop: finance, IT and risk/compliance should jointly review how Gemini is used, what prompts are standardised and how outputs are archived. This avoids the two extremes of uncontrolled experimentation and overbearing restrictions that kill adoption.

Start with a Focused Pilot Linked to a Real Decision

Many AI initiatives fail because they are detached from concrete business decisions. For AI-powered scenario planning with Gemini, select a specific upcoming decision – for example, a pricing review, capacity expansion, or a major supplier negotiation. Use this as the anchor for your first AI-enabled scenario cycle.

Define in advance what “better” looks like: faster scenario turnaround, more scenarios considered, clearer management communication, or improved risk coverage. Run a few planning cycles where Gemini supports the same recurring process. This creates narrative proof inside the organisation that AI is not a lab experiment but a lever for tangible financial choices.

Used with a clear driver model, strong governance and a real decision in mind, Gemini transforms weak scenario planning into a fast, iterative capability that finance can operate with confidence. At Reruption, we work hands-on with finance and IT teams to embed Gemini into existing Sheets and BI workflows, clean up driver models and build the first AI-enabled planning cycles together. If you want to see how this could work for your organisation, we can validate a concrete use case in a focused PoC and then help you scale what works.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Education to Banking: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Khan Academy

Education

Khan Academy faced the monumental task of providing personalized tutoring at scale to its 100 million+ annual users, many in under-resourced areas. Traditional online courses, while effective, lacked the interactive, one-on-one guidance of human tutors, leading to high dropout rates and uneven mastery. Teachers were overwhelmed with planning, grading, and differentiation for diverse classrooms. In 2023, as AI advanced, educators grappled with hallucinations and over-reliance risks in tools like ChatGPT, which often gave direct answers instead of fostering learning. Khan Academy needed an AI that promoted step-by-step reasoning without cheating, while ensuring equitable access as a nonprofit. Scaling safely across subjects and languages posed technical and ethical hurdles.

Lösung

Khan Academy developed Khanmigo, an AI-powered tutor and teaching assistant built on GPT-4, piloted in March 2023 for teachers and expanded to students. Unlike generic chatbots, Khanmigo uses custom prompts to guide learners Socratically—prompting questions, hints, and feedback without direct answers—across math, science, humanities, and more. The nonprofit approach emphasized safety guardrails, integration with Khan's content library, and iterative improvements via teacher feedback. Partnerships like Microsoft enabled free global access for teachers by 2024, now in 34+ languages. Ongoing updates, such as 2025 math computation enhancements, address accuracy challenges.

Ergebnisse

  • User Growth: 68,000 (2023-24 pilot) to 700,000+ (2024-25 school year)
  • Teacher Adoption: Free for teachers in most countries, millions using Khan Academy tools
  • Languages Supported: 34+ for Khanmigo
  • Engagement: Improved student persistence and mastery in pilots
  • Time Savings: Teachers save hours on lesson planning and prep
  • Scale: Integrated with 429+ free courses in 43 languages
Read case study →

Duke Health

Healthcare

Sepsis is a leading cause of hospital mortality, affecting over 1.7 million Americans annually with a 20-30% mortality rate when recognized late. At Duke Health, clinicians faced the challenge of early detection amid subtle, non-specific symptoms mimicking other conditions, leading to delayed interventions like antibiotics and fluids. Traditional scoring systems like qSOFA or NEWS suffered from low sensitivity (around 50-60%) and high false alarms, causing alert fatigue in busy wards and EDs. Additionally, integrating AI into real-time clinical workflows posed risks: ensuring model accuracy on diverse patient data, gaining clinician trust, and complying with regulations without disrupting care. Duke needed a custom, explainable model trained on its own EHR data to avoid vendor biases and enable seamless adoption across its three hospitals.

Lösung

Duke's Sepsis Watch is a deep learning model leveraging real-time EHR data (vitals, labs, demographics) to continuously monitor hospitalized patients and predict sepsis onset 6 hours in advance with high precision. Developed by the Duke Institute for Health Innovation (DIHI), it triggers nurse-facing alerts (Best Practice Advisories) only when risk exceeds thresholds, minimizing fatigue. The model was trained on Duke-specific data from 250,000+ encounters, achieving AUROC of 0.935 at 3 hours prior and 88% sensitivity at low false positive rates. Integration via Epic EHR used a human-centered design, involving clinicians in iterations to refine alerts and workflows, ensuring safe deployment without overriding clinical judgment.

Ergebnisse

  • AUROC: 0.935 for sepsis prediction 3 hours prior
  • Sensitivity: 88% at 3 hours early detection
  • Reduced time to antibiotics: 1.2 hours faster
  • Alert override rate: <10% (high clinician trust)
  • Sepsis bundle compliance: Improved by 20%
  • Mortality reduction: Associated with 12% drop in sepsis deaths
Read case study →

NatWest

Banking

NatWest Group, a leading UK bank serving over 19 million customers, grappled with escalating demands for digital customer service. Traditional systems like the original Cora chatbot handled routine queries effectively but struggled with complex, nuanced interactions, often escalating 80-90% of cases to human agents. This led to delays, higher operational costs, and risks to customer satisfaction amid rising expectations for instant, personalized support . Simultaneously, the surge in financial fraud posed a critical threat, requiring seamless fraud reporting and detection within chat interfaces without compromising security or user trust. Regulatory compliance, data privacy under UK GDPR, and ethical AI deployment added layers of complexity, as the bank aimed to scale support while minimizing errors in high-stakes banking scenarios . Balancing innovation with reliability was paramount; poor AI performance could erode trust in a sector where customer satisfaction directly impacts retention and revenue .

Lösung

Cora+, launched in June 2024, marked NatWest's first major upgrade using generative AI to enable proactive, intuitive responses for complex queries, reducing escalations and enhancing self-service . This built on Cora's established platform, which already managed millions of interactions monthly. In a pioneering move, NatWest partnered with OpenAI in March 2025—becoming the first UK-headquartered bank to do so—integrating LLMs into both customer-facing Cora and internal tool Ask Archie. This allowed natural language processing for fraud reports, personalized advice, and process simplification while embedding safeguards for compliance and bias mitigation . The approach emphasized ethical AI, with rigorous testing, human oversight, and continuous monitoring to ensure safe, accurate interactions in fraud detection and service delivery .

Ergebnisse

  • 150% increase in Cora customer satisfaction scores (2024)
  • Proactive resolution of complex queries without human intervention
  • First UK bank OpenAI partnership, accelerating AI adoption
  • Enhanced fraud detection via real-time chat analysis
  • Millions of monthly interactions handled autonomously
  • Significant reduction in agent escalation rates
Read case study →

Stanford Health Care

Healthcare

Stanford Health Care, a leading academic medical center, faced escalating clinician burnout from overwhelming administrative tasks, including drafting patient correspondence and managing inboxes overloaded with messages. With vast EHR data volumes, extracting insights for precision medicine and real-time patient monitoring was manual and time-intensive, delaying care and increasing error risks. Traditional workflows struggled with predictive analytics for events like sepsis or falls, and computer vision for imaging analysis, amid growing patient volumes. Clinicians spent excessive time on routine communications, such as lab result notifications, hindering focus on complex diagnostics. The need for scalable, unbiased AI algorithms was critical to leverage extensive datasets for better outcomes.

Lösung

Partnering with Microsoft, Stanford became one of the first healthcare systems to pilot Azure OpenAI Service within Epic EHR, enabling generative AI for drafting patient messages and natural language queries on clinical data. This integration used GPT-4 to automate correspondence, reducing manual effort. Complementing this, the Healthcare AI Applied Research Team deployed machine learning for predictive analytics (e.g., sepsis, falls prediction) and explored computer vision in imaging projects. Tools like ChatEHR allow conversational access to patient records, accelerating chart reviews. Phased pilots addressed data privacy and bias, ensuring explainable AI for clinicians.

Ergebnisse

  • 50% reduction in time for drafting patient correspondence
  • 30% decrease in clinician inbox burden from AI message routing
  • 91% accuracy in predictive models for inpatient adverse events
  • 20% faster lab result communication to patients
  • Improved autoimmune detection by 1 year prior to diagnosis
Read case study →

Revolut

Fintech

Revolut faced escalating Authorized Push Payment (APP) fraud, where scammers psychologically manipulate customers into authorizing transfers to fraudulent accounts, often under guises like investment opportunities. Traditional rule-based systems struggled against sophisticated social engineering tactics, leading to substantial financial losses despite Revolut's rapid growth to over 35 million customers worldwide. The rise in digital payments amplified vulnerabilities, with fraudsters exploiting real-time transfers that bypassed conventional checks. APP scams evaded detection by mimicking legitimate behaviors, resulting in billions in global losses annually and eroding customer trust in fintech platforms like Revolut. Urgent need for intelligent, adaptive anomaly detection to intervene before funds were pushed.

Lösung

Revolut deployed an AI-powered scam detection feature using machine learning anomaly detection to monitor transactions and user behaviors in real-time. The system analyzes patterns indicative of scams, such as unusual payment prompts tied to investment lures, and intervenes by alerting users or blocking suspicious actions. Leveraging supervised and unsupervised ML algorithms, it detects deviations from normal behavior during high-risk moments, 'breaking the scammer's spell' before authorization. Integrated into the app, it processes vast transaction data for proactive fraud prevention without disrupting legitimate flows.

Ergebnisse

  • 30% reduction in fraud losses from APP-related card scams
  • Targets investment opportunity scams specifically
  • Real-time intervention during testing phase
  • Protects 35 million global customers
  • Deployed since February 2024
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Connect Gemini to a Clean, Structured Scenario Sheet

Before involving AI, consolidate your key planning assumptions into a structured Google Sheet. Separate input drivers (volumes, prices, FX, headcount) from calculated outputs (revenue, margin, cash flow). Use consistent names for driver cells or ranges (e.g. "volume_base_case", "price_sensitivity_range") so Gemini can reference them clearly.

Once the sheet is ready, use Gemini in Sheets to describe what each driver means and how scenarios should be built. For example, add a note in a separate tab called "Scenario_Instructions" and let Gemini read it as context for further actions.

Example Gemini prompt in Sheets:
You are assisting with financial scenario planning.

The current sheet contains:
- Input drivers in the tab 'Drivers'
- The base P&L model in 'Base_Model'

Tasks:
1) Create a new tab 'Scenario_Assumptions' listing scenario names in rows
   and driver names in columns.
2) Propose 6 coherent scenarios covering:
   - Demand: -20%, -10%, base, +10%, +20%
   - Price changes by product group
   - FX movements for EUR/USD and EUR/GBP
3) Fill the table with suggested percentage deltas vs base for each driver.

Make sure the scenarios are internally consistent and business plausible.

This approach lets Gemini do the heavy lifting of structuring scenarios while finance retains full control over the underlying formulas and logic.

Use Gemini to Generate Sensitivity Tables and Tornado Charts

Manual sensitivity analysis usually stops at 1–2 variables. With Gemini in Sheets, you can automatically generate multi-variable sensitivity tables and prepare the data for visualisations such as tornado charts in your BI tool.

Prepare a dedicated tab (e.g. "Sensitivity_Setup") where you list key drivers and their test ranges. Then instruct Gemini to build an output table that calculates the effect on EBIT, cash flow or another KPI.

Example Gemini prompt in Sheets:
Create a sensitivity analysis in a new tab called 'Sensitivity_Output'.

Use the following drivers and ranges from 'Sensitivity_Setup':
- Unit volume delta: -20% to +20% in 5% steps
- Average selling price: -5% to +5% in 1% steps
- FX EUR/USD: -10% to +10% in 2% steps

For each combination, calculate:
- Revenue
- Gross margin
- EBIT

Link all calculations back to 'Base_Model' formulas. Do not hard-code
numbers. Prepare the output so it can be easily used as the data source
for a tornado chart (one row per scenario, one column per KPI).

Once Gemini builds this table, connect it to Looker Studio, Power BI or your preferred BI tool to visualise which drivers matter most.

Automate Narrative Scenario Summaries for Management

Senior leaders often struggle to digest raw tables. Use Gemini in Docs to automatically convert scenario outputs into short, comparable narratives that highlight impacts on revenue, margin and cash. This not only saves time but also ensures consistent messaging across cycles.

Export or link key scenario outputs from Sheets into a summary tab, then copy them into a Doc Gemini can read. Ask Gemini to produce management-ready explanations.

Example Gemini prompt in Docs:
You are a finance business partner preparing a board briefing.

Below is a table summarising 5 scenarios (Base, Demand Shock,
Price Increase, Supply Disruption, FX Shock) with the following
metrics per scenario: Revenue, Gross Margin %, EBIT, Operating Cash Flow.

Write a concise narrative (max 150 words per scenario) that:
- Explains the main driver differences vs base case
- Highlights the impact on EBIT and cash
- Flags operational implications (capacity, headcount, working capital)

Use clear, non-technical language and avoid overconfidence.
Mention where assumptions are particularly uncertain.

This turns Gemini into a narrative engine that keeps finance focused on validating content, not drafting from scratch.

Run What-If Simulations via Natural-Language Q&A

Instead of building every what-if scenario manually, use Gemini as a conversational interface on top of your model. In Sheets, you can ask Gemini to temporarily apply new assumptions, calculate the impact, and then either store or discard that scenario. This is especially useful in live meetings with business stakeholders.

Keep one dedicated "sandbox" tab where Gemini can safely change assumptions without touching the canonical model. Use prompts that clearly describe both the change and the desired outputs.

Example Gemini prompt in Sheets:
Assume we are in a meeting with Sales discussing a potential
10% list price increase for Product Line A starting in Q3.

Tasks:
1) In the 'Sandbox' tab, copy the current base assumptions.
2) Apply a +10% price increase for Product Line A in Q3 and Q4 only.
3) Recalculate revenue, gross margin and EBIT for FY.
4) Summarise the incremental impact vs base case in a small table
   (Revenue delta, Gross margin delta in %, EBIT delta).

Do not change any other drivers.

This setup gives finance the agility to answer "what happens if…" questions in minutes without breaking core models.

Integrate External Data for More Realistic Scenarios

Weak scenarios often ignore market reality. Use Gemini with external data sources (CSV exports, APIs feeding into Sheets, or data warehouse connections powering BI) to incorporate FX rates, commodity prices, interest curves or macro indicators into your planning. Gemini can then build scenarios that explicitly reference these external drivers.

For example, you can load historical FX data into a sheet and let Gemini propose plausible FX paths and their impact on revenue and cost.

Example Gemini prompt in Sheets:
We have 5 years of monthly EUR/USD FX data in the tab 'FX_History'.

1) Analyse volatility and identify typical annual ranges.
2) Propose three 12-month FX scenarios (Stable, Moderate Swing,
   High Volatility) with monthly rates in a new tab 'FX_Scenarios'.
3) Link these scenarios into the revenue and cost calculations
   in 'Base_Model' and calculate the impact on EBIT for each.

Document your logic in a short explanation note in 'FX_Scenarios'.

By embedding external factors this way, your Gemini-generated scenarios become more robust and easier to defend in front of stakeholders.

Set Up KPIs and Logs to Track Scenario Quality and Usage

To make AI-driven scenario planning sustainable, treat it as a product, not a one-off project. Track metrics like number of scenarios generated per planning cycle, turnaround time from request to delivery, and how often scenario insights are used in actual decisions (e.g. referenced in steering committee minutes).

Maintain a simple log (in Sheets or a lightweight database) where each scenario set is tagged with its purpose, key assumptions, Gemini’s involvement (e.g. "assumption generation", "sensitivity build", "narrative drafting") and final outcome. Over time, this gives you evidence about where Gemini adds most value and where you need additional controls.

Expected outcomes when these best practices are implemented are realistic and measurable: 30–50% reduction in manual time spent on scenario construction, 2–3x increase in the number of scenarios considered per major decision, and significantly faster turnaround for what-if requests from the business. More importantly, finance gains a repeatable, explainable AI-enabled process instead of ad-hoc spreadsheet heroics.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini strengthens scenario planning in finance by automating the heavy lifting that currently slows your team down. It can:

  • Generate structured scenario assumption tables based on your existing driver model in Sheets
  • Build multi-variable sensitivity analyses and link them back to your core P&L and cash-flow logic
  • Run ad-hoc what-if simulations via natural-language prompts, without duplicating workbooks
  • Produce clear narrative summaries for management based on the numeric outputs

Instead of spending days copying spreadsheets and tweaking cells, your team focuses on validating assumptions, interpreting results and advising the business.

You do not need a full data science team to start using Gemini for financial planning and forecasting. The critical ingredients are:

  • A finance team comfortable with Google Sheets and basic driver-based modelling
  • Access to Gemini in your Google Workspace and clarity on what financial data it may use
  • Lightweight IT support to manage permissions and, if needed, connect Sheets to your data warehouse or BI layer

Reruption typically works with a small cross-functional group (finance lead, one or two analysts, IT contact) to set up the first Gemini-enabled planning workflows. We then document prompts, templates and governance so your team can run the process independently.

For most organisations, you can see tangible benefits from AI-assisted scenario planning with Gemini within one or two planning cycles. A focused pilot around a specific decision (e.g. next year’s budget, a pricing change or capacity plan) can be designed and implemented in 4–8 weeks.

In the first weeks, most gains come from faster scenario construction and automated narrative summaries. Over subsequent cycles, as your driver model and prompts mature, you will notice improved scenario coverage (more scenarios considered) and shorter turnaround times for what-if analyses. Full institutionalisation – where Gemini is a standard part of your planning playbook – typically takes one to three quarters, depending on organisation size and change readiness.

The direct tooling cost of Gemini in Google Workspace is usually modest compared to the value of finance time and better decisions. The main investment is in configuring your models, prompts and workflows. In our experience, finance teams often free up 30–50% of the time previously spent on manual scenario building and repetitive reporting.

ROI shows up in three areas: reduced manual effort (fewer late nights rebuilding models), improved decision quality (more and better scenarios considered) and faster response to shocks (being able to quantify options within days instead of weeks). We recommend defining simple KPIs at the start – such as hours saved per cycle and number of alternative strategies evaluated – so you can measure the impact of Gemini objectively.

Reruption supports organisations end-to-end, from idea to working solution. With our AI PoC offering (9,900€), we first validate that your specific use case for Gemini in scenario planning is technically feasible and delivers value. This includes scoping the use case, selecting the right architecture, building a working prototype in your environment and measuring performance.

Beyond the PoC, we apply our Co-Preneur approach: we embed with your finance and IT teams like co-founders, not external observers. We help clean up driver models, design prompts and templates, configure data access, and run the first AI-enabled planning cycles together until something real ships. Our focus is to leave you with a robust, AI-first scenario planning capability that your own team can operate and evolve.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media