The Challenge: Manual Forecast Consolidation

Every forecasting cycle, finance teams chase down spreadsheets from regions, business units, and cost centers. Each file has its own layout, naming logic, and hidden assumptions. Consolidation means copying, pasting, fixing broken links, and reconciling versions just to get to a single view of the numbers. By the time the consolidated forecast is ready, many of the underlying assumptions are already outdated.

Traditional approaches – shared network drives, email submissions, and even sophisticated linked workbooks – no longer scale. The more your organisation grows, the more fragile these setups become. A single overwritten cell, a changed tab name, or a missing file can break the entire consolidation chain. Finance ends up maintaining a complex spreadsheet ecosystem instead of running a robust, driver-based financial planning process.

The impact is substantial. Manual consolidation introduces avoidable errors, slows down planning cycles, and limits how many scenarios you can realistically run. Business stakeholders wait days or weeks for updated views, making it harder to react to market shifts, supply disruptions, or demand spikes. Instead of enabling proactive, dynamic planning, your forecasting process becomes a bottleneck and a source of tension between finance and the rest of the business.

The good news: this is a solvable problem. Modern AI tools like Gemini integrated with Google Sheets and BigQuery can standardise templates, automate consolidation logic, and even generate predictive scenarios once the data is clean. At Reruption, we’ve repeatedly replaced brittle spreadsheet workflows with AI-supported processes that finance teams can actually trust and own. In the rest of this page, you’ll find practical, concrete guidance on how to move from manual consolidation to an automated, AI-ready forecasting setup.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building real-world AI automations in finance-like workflows, we’ve seen the same pattern: the hardest part of fixing manual forecast consolidation is not the math, it’s the process. Gemini for forecast consolidation works best when it sits on top of a clear data model and well-defined ownership. Used correctly with Google Sheets and BigQuery, Gemini can become the engine that unifies templates, cleans data, and produces consolidated views in minutes instead of days.

Define a Single Source of Truth Before You Automate

Before asking Gemini to consolidate anything, you need to decide what “truth” looks like in your planning process. That means clearly defining your chart of accounts, cost center hierarchy, entity structure, and key drivers. If each region uses its own naming or time granularity, Gemini will still be guessing. Automation amplifies whatever structure you give it – good or bad.

Strategically, treat BigQuery as your central planning data store and Google Sheets as the front-end for submission and review. This separation lets finance teams keep their familiar spreadsheet interface while Gemini works against a stable, governed model in the background. Investing time upfront in that model pays off every forecast cycle that follows.

Position Gemini as a Co-Pilot, Not a Black Box

For finance leaders, control and auditability are non-negotiable. If AI-based forecast consolidation feels like a black box, adoption will stall. Frame Gemini as a co-pilot that executes your consolidation rules, highlights anomalies, and suggests scenarios – but leaves final decisions with finance.

Design your setup so that every automated consolidation step is explainable: which sources were used, which mappings applied, what exceptions were flagged. This builds trust and makes it easier for controllers and FP&A to challenge and refine the logic over time, instead of bypassing it and falling back to manual work.

Start with a Narrow Forecasting Scope and Expand

Trying to automate the entire enterprise forecasting process in one go is risky. A better strategic approach is to pick one cycle or scope – for example, OPEX forecasting for one region or selected cost centers – and implement Gemini-driven consolidation end-to-end there.

This gives you a realistic sandbox to test template standards, data flows into BigQuery, and Gemini’s role in cleaning, mapping, and summarising submissions. Once the approach proves itself in one slice of the business, you can scale to more regions, P&Ls, and planning horizons with much less resistance.

Clarify Roles Between Finance, IT, and Data Teams

Automating manual forecast consolidation with Gemini is not just a tooling decision; it’s an operating model change. Decide early who owns templates, who manages the BigQuery data model, who configures Gemini, and who approves changes to business rules. Without clear ownership, you’ll drift back into spreadsheet chaos.

A pragmatic model is: finance owns drivers, assumptions, and review workflows; data/BI owns the core data model in BigQuery; and an AI engineering partner like Reruption takes responsibility for the Gemini prompts, automations, and integration glue. This division keeps finance in control of planning while ensuring the technical backbone remains robust.

Design for Auditability and Risk Management from Day One

Regulators, auditors, and boards increasingly expect transparency in how forecasts are produced. When you introduce AI into financial planning, you must show where AI is used, how results are validated, and how overrides are handled. Build Gemini into your process with explicit checkpoints rather than letting it silently change numbers.

That means keeping version histories, logging AI-generated transformations, and requiring human approvals for material changes. Strategically, this does two things: it keeps risk within acceptable boundaries, and it gives you an auditable story about how automated consolidation has improved control and reduced manual error – which is often stronger than the status quo.

Used thoughtfully, Gemini with Google Sheets and BigQuery turns forecast consolidation from a manual, error-prone exercise into a controlled, repeatable process that can scale with your business. The key is combining a solid data foundation with clear roles and explainable AI logic so finance gains speed without giving up control. Reruption’s engineers and Co-Preneur teams specialise in building exactly these kinds of AI-first workflows inside organisations; if you want to explore what automated forecast consolidation could look like in your environment, we’re ready to help you test it quickly and safely.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Aerospace to Manufacturing: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Airbus

Aerospace

In aircraft design, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are essential for predicting airflow around wings, fuselages, and novel configurations critical to fuel efficiency and emissions reduction. However, traditional high-fidelity RANS solvers require hours to days per run on supercomputers, limiting engineers to just a few dozen iterations per design cycle and stifling innovation for next-gen hydrogen-powered aircraft like ZEROe. This computational bottleneck was particularly acute amid Airbus' push for decarbonized aviation by 2035, where complex geometries demand exhaustive exploration to optimize lift-drag ratios while minimizing weight. Collaborations with DLR and ONERA highlighted the need for faster tools, as manual tuning couldn't scale to test thousands of variants needed for laminar flow or blended-wing-body concepts.

Lösung

Machine learning surrogate models, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), were trained on vast CFD datasets to emulate full simulations in milliseconds. Airbus integrated these into a generative design pipeline, where AI predicts pressure fields, velocities, and forces, enforcing Navier-Stokes physics via hybrid loss functions for accuracy. Development involved curating millions of simulation snapshots from legacy runs, GPU-accelerated training, and iterative fine-tuning with experimental wind-tunnel data. This enabled rapid iteration: AI screens designs, high-fidelity CFD verifies top candidates, slashing overall compute by orders of magnitude while maintaining <5% error on key metrics.

Ergebnisse

  • Simulation time: 1 hour → 30 ms (120,000x speedup)
  • Design iterations: +10,000 per cycle in same timeframe
  • Prediction accuracy: 95%+ for lift/drag coefficients
  • 50% reduction in design phase timeline
  • 30-40% fewer high-fidelity CFD runs required
  • Fuel burn optimization: up to 5% improvement in predictions
Read case study →

Bank of America

Banking

Bank of America faced a high volume of routine customer inquiries, such as account balances, payments, and transaction histories, overwhelming traditional call centers and support channels. With millions of daily digital banking users, the bank struggled to provide 24/7 personalized financial advice at scale, leading to inefficiencies, longer wait times, and inconsistent service quality. Customers demanded proactive insights beyond basic queries, like spending patterns or financial recommendations, but human agents couldn't handle the sheer scale without escalating costs. Additionally, ensuring conversational naturalness in a regulated industry like banking posed challenges, including compliance with financial privacy laws, accurate interpretation of complex queries, and seamless integration into the mobile app without disrupting user experience. The bank needed to balance AI automation with human-like empathy to maintain trust and high satisfaction scores.

Lösung

Bank of America developed Erica, an in-house NLP-powered virtual assistant integrated directly into its mobile banking app, leveraging natural language processing and predictive analytics to handle queries conversationally. Erica acts as a gateway for self-service, processing routine tasks instantly while offering personalized insights, such as cash flow predictions or tailored advice, using client data securely. The solution evolved from a basic navigation tool to a sophisticated AI, incorporating generative AI elements for more natural interactions and escalating complex issues to human agents seamlessly. Built with a focus on in-house language models, it ensures control over data privacy and customization, driving enterprise-wide AI adoption while enhancing digital engagement.

Ergebnisse

  • 3+ billion total client interactions since 2018
  • Nearly 50 million unique users assisted
  • 58+ million interactions per month (2025)
  • 2 billion interactions reached by April 2024 (doubled from 1B in 18 months)
  • 42 million clients helped by 2024
  • 19% earnings spike linked to efficiency gains
Read case study →

Unilever

Human Resources

Unilever, a consumer goods giant handling 1.8 million job applications annually, struggled with a manual recruitment process that was extremely time-consuming and inefficient . Traditional methods took up to four months to fill positions, overburdening recruiters and delaying talent acquisition across its global operations . The process also risked unconscious biases in CV screening and interviews, limiting workforce diversity and potentially overlooking qualified candidates from underrepresented groups . High volumes made it impossible to assess every applicant thoroughly, leading to high costs estimated at millions annually and inconsistent hiring quality . Unilever needed a scalable, fair system to streamline early-stage screening while maintaining psychometric rigor.

Lösung

Unilever adopted an AI-powered recruitment funnel partnering with Pymetrics for neuroscience-based gamified assessments that measure cognitive, emotional, and behavioral traits via ML algorithms trained on diverse global data . This was followed by AI-analyzed video interviews using computer vision and NLP to evaluate body language, facial expressions, tone of voice, and word choice objectively . Applications were anonymized to minimize bias, with AI shortlisting top 10-20% of candidates for human review, integrating psychometric ML models for personality profiling . The system was piloted in high-volume entry-level roles before global rollout .

Ergebnisse

  • Time-to-hire: 90% reduction (4 months to 4 weeks)
  • Recruiter time saved: 50,000 hours
  • Annual cost savings: £1 million
  • Diversity hires increase: 16% (incl. neuro-atypical candidates)
  • Candidates shortlisted for humans: 90% reduction
  • Applications processed: 1.8 million/year
Read case study →

IBM

Technology

In a massive global workforce exceeding 280,000 employees, IBM grappled with high employee turnover rates, particularly among high-performing and top talent. The cost of replacing a single employee—including recruitment, onboarding, and lost productivity—can exceed $4,000-$10,000 per hire, amplifying losses in a competitive tech talent market. Manually identifying at-risk employees was nearly impossible amid vast HR data silos spanning demographics, performance reviews, compensation, job satisfaction surveys, and work-life balance metrics. Traditional HR approaches relied on exit interviews and anecdotal feedback, which were reactive and ineffective for prevention. With attrition rates hovering around industry averages of 10-20% annually, IBM faced annual costs in the hundreds of millions from rehiring and training, compounded by knowledge loss and morale dips in a tight labor market. The challenge intensified as retaining scarce AI and tech skills became critical for IBM's innovation edge.

Lösung

IBM developed a predictive attrition ML model using its Watson AI platform, analyzing 34+ HR variables like age, salary, overtime, job role, performance ratings, and distance from home from an anonymized dataset of 1,470 employees. Algorithms such as logistic regression, decision trees, random forests, and gradient boosting were trained to flag employees with high flight risk, achieving 95% accuracy in identifying those likely to leave within six months. The model integrated with HR systems for real-time scoring, triggering personalized interventions like career coaching, salary adjustments, or flexible work options. This data-driven shift empowered CHROs and managers to act proactively, prioritizing top performers at risk.

Ergebnisse

  • 95% accuracy in predicting employee turnover
  • Processed 1,470+ employee records with 34 variables
  • 93% accuracy benchmark in optimized Extra Trees model
  • Reduced hiring costs by averting high-value attrition
  • Potential annual savings exceeding $300M in retention (reported)
Read case study →

Associated Press (AP)

News Media

In the mid-2010s, the Associated Press (AP) faced significant constraints in its business newsroom due to limited manual resources. With only a handful of journalists dedicated to earnings coverage, AP could produce just around 300 quarterly earnings reports per quarter, primarily focusing on major S&P 500 companies. This manual process was labor-intensive: reporters had to extract data from financial filings, analyze key metrics like revenue, profits, and growth rates, and craft concise narratives under tight deadlines. As the number of publicly traded companies grew, AP struggled to cover smaller firms, leaving vast amounts of market-relevant information unreported. This limitation not only reduced AP's comprehensive market coverage but also tied up journalists on rote tasks, preventing them from pursuing investigative stories or deeper analysis. The pressure of quarterly earnings seasons amplified these issues, with deadlines coinciding across thousands of companies, making scalable reporting impossible without innovation.

Lösung

To address this, AP partnered with Automated Insights in 2014, implementing their Wordsmith NLG platform. Wordsmith uses templated algorithms to transform structured financial data—such as earnings per share, revenue figures, and year-over-year changes—into readable, journalistic prose. Reporters input verified data from sources like Zacks Investment Research, and the AI generates draft stories in seconds, which humans then lightly edit for accuracy and style. The solution involved creating custom NLG templates tailored to AP's style, ensuring stories sounded human-written while adhering to journalistic standards. This hybrid approach—AI for volume, humans for oversight—overcame quality concerns. By 2015, AP announced it would automate the majority of U.S. corporate earnings stories, scaling coverage dramatically without proportional staff increases.

Ergebnisse

  • 14x increase in quarterly earnings stories: 300 to 4,200
  • Coverage expanded to 4,000+ U.S. public companies per quarter
  • Equivalent to freeing time of 20 full-time reporters
  • Stories published in seconds vs. hours manually
  • Zero reported errors in automated stories post-implementation
  • Sustained use expanded to sports, weather, and lottery reports
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Standardise Forecast Templates in Google Sheets

Start by enforcing a single, standardised forecast template across all regions and business units in Google Sheets. Lock structural elements like time periods, account codes, and cost center fields, and make variable inputs (volumes, prices, drivers) clearly identifiable. This consistency is what allows Gemini to process and consolidate submissions reliably.

Use data validation and dropdowns for entities, cost centers, and account codes to reduce free-text input and mapping errors. Store the master template in a controlled folder and use Apps Script or Workspace add-ons to distribute copies to contributors with controlled sharing permissions.

Load Submissions into BigQuery as a Staging Layer

Don’t let consolidation live only in spreadsheets. Configure an automated pipeline (using Apps Script, Dataform, or similar) that writes each submitted Google Sheet into a BigQuery staging table. Include metadata like region, business unit, version, and submission timestamp so you can filter and audit later.

From there, define transformation queries that unify currencies, time granularity, and account mappings into a standard planning schema. This is the dataset Gemini will read, clean, and summarise – giving you a single, reliable layer for analytics and reporting beyond the spreadsheets.

Use Gemini to Clean, Map, and Flag Anomalies

Once your forecast submissions land in BigQuery, use Gemini to automate data cleaning and anomaly detection. For example, you can have Gemini review new forecast lines against historical actuals and prior forecasts, then flag unusual variances or missing entries for finance review.

In a Gemini-connected environment, prompts might look like this:

Role: You are a financial planning assistant helping with forecast consolidation.

Task: Analyze the latest forecast data (current_forecast) against:
- Last forecast (previous_forecast)
- Last 4 quarters of actuals (actuals_4q)

For each cost center and account combination:
- Flag any variance > 20% vs previous_forecast
- Flag any variance > 30% vs average of actuals_4q
- Suggest likely reasons based on seasonality and driver changes
- Propose a cleaned version where obvious data entry mistakes exist

Output a JSON payload with:
- cost_center
- account
- original_forecast
- suggested_correction
- variance_flags
- explanation

Embed this into a scheduled process so controllers receive a pre-analysed list of issues each cycle rather than hunting manually through thousands of lines.

Automate Consolidated Views and Management Summaries

After cleaning and validation, use Gemini to generate consolidated forecast views and narrative summaries that finance can directly review with management. Have Gemini pull from the curated BigQuery tables and produce P&L, cost center, and region-level aggregates, then generate commentary on main drivers and changes.

Example prompt for a management summary:

Role: You are an FP&A analyst summarizing the new consolidated forecast.

Input data:
- consolidated_forecast table (current cycle)
- previous_forecast table (last cycle)
- variance_analysis table (by region and account)

Task:
- Summarize total revenue, gross margin, and EBIT vs last forecast
- Highlight top 5 positive and top 5 negative variances with concrete drivers
- Identify 2-3 risks and 2-3 opportunities based on the forecast
- Keep language concise and suitable for an executive audience

Output: 5-8 bullet points followed by a short narrative (max 400 words).

This turns raw consolidated numbers into “finance-ready” output in minutes, while leaving review and approval firmly with your FP&A team.

Enable What-If Scenarios Directly from the Consolidated Data

One of the biggest advantages of having consolidation automated and centralised is that you can finally explore dynamic, driver-based scenarios without rebuilding everything manually. Use Gemini to apply parameter changes (e.g. volume growth, FX rates, price changes) to your BigQuery-based forecast and generate alternative views.

Here’s an example prompt pattern:

Role: You are a scenario planning assistant for the finance team.

Input:
- consolidated_forecast_base
- scenario_parameters: { volume_delta_pct_by_region, fx_rates, price_change_pct_by_product_line }

Task:
- Apply the scenario_parameters to the base forecast
- Recalculate revenue, gross margin, and EBIT by region and business unit
- Compare scenario results vs base forecast
- Output tables plus a short explanation of the key changes.

Connect these scenarios back to Google Sheets dashboards or Looker Studio to let finance and business leaders interact with the results without touching the underlying logic.

Track KPIs for Process Quality and Speed Improvements

To prove the value of Gemini-based forecast consolidation, define and monitor a small set of KPIs. Examples include: time from submission deadline to consolidated view, number of manual adjustments after AI cleaning, number of detected anomalies per cycle, and the share of templates submitted correctly on first attempt.

Visualise these in a simple dashboard so you can show stakeholders how automation has reduced cycle times and error rates over successive planning rounds. This also helps you prioritise where to refine templates, rules, or prompts next.

When implemented in this way, organisations typically see consolidation time cut from days to hours, a measurable reduction in manual errors, and a higher share of time spent on analysis and scenarios instead of mechanical data work. The goal is not to remove finance judgment, but to free it from low-value tasks so planning can become faster, more dynamic, and more strategically relevant.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini reduces manual consolidation by standardising inputs, automating data cleaning, and generating consolidated views from a central dataset. Instead of copying and pasting across dozens of spreadsheets, forecast submissions flow from Google Sheets into BigQuery, where Gemini applies mapping rules, checks for anomalies, and produces unified forecast tables.

Finance then works with a single, trusted source of forecast data, plus AI-generated variance reports and summaries. The result is fewer manual touchpoints, fewer formula errors, and significantly faster closing of each forecasting cycle.

You typically need three capabilities: finance process expertise, basic data engineering, and AI configuration skills. Finance defines the planning model, drivers, and approval workflows. A data/BI profile sets up BigQuery tables, data flows from Google Sheets, and access controls. An AI engineer or technically inclined analyst works on Gemini prompts and automations, integrating them into your existing tooling.

Reruption often covers the AI engineering and integration side, working directly with your finance and BI teams. This reduces the need to hire a dedicated AI team just to get started and helps you transfer knowledge so the setup can be owned internally over time.

For a focused scope (for example, OPEX forecasting for one region or business unit), you can usually see tangible results within one or two planning cycles. A first Gemini-powered consolidation pilot can often be stood up in a few weeks: standardise the template, connect Google Sheets to BigQuery, configure basic prompts for cleaning and anomaly detection, and generate a consolidated view.

From there, each subsequent cycle becomes faster and more automated as you refine mapping rules, expand coverage to more entities, and add scenario capabilities. Full enterprise-wide automation is an iterative journey, but the benefits begin as soon as one part of your forecasting process is transitioned to the new model.

The main cost components are engineering time to set up the data pipelines and Gemini workflows, plus ongoing AI usage fees. Compared to the cumulative hours senior finance staff spend on manual consolidation each year, payback is often quick. Typical ROI comes from reduced cycle time, lower error rates, and the ability to run more and better scenarios without extra effort.

Instead of just looking at tool cost, consider the value of having consolidated forecasts ready days earlier, with higher quality. This supports faster decision-making in areas like hiring, inventory, and investments. Many organisations find that the saved time of controllers and FP&A alone justifies the investment, even before accounting for better decisions enabled by more dynamic planning.

Reruption specialises in building AI-first finance workflows that actually run inside your organisation, not just on slide decks. With our 9.900€ AI PoC offering, we can quickly test whether Gemini can automate a meaningful slice of your forecast consolidation – from defining the use case and data requirements to delivering a working prototype and performance metrics.

Beyond the PoC, our Co-Preneur approach means we embed with your team, help design the data model in BigQuery, standardise Google Sheets templates, configure Gemini prompts, and set up governance and security. We take entrepreneurial ownership of outcomes alongside you and leave you with a production-ready setup and a clear roadmap for scaling AI across your financial planning processes.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media