The Challenge: Inaccurate Cash Flow Projections

Many finance teams still build cash flow projections in large spreadsheets, driven by high-level DSO assumptions, budget figures, and generic payment terms. What looks tidy on paper rarely reflects reality: customers pay earlier or later than expected, seasonality amplifies peaks and troughs, and contract-specific clauses change inflow timing. The result is a forecast that feels precise but is only loosely connected to real payment behavior.

Traditional approaches struggle because they are too static and too manual. Updating a 12–18 month cash flow file means stitching together ERP exports, bank statements, and pipeline data, then manually adjusting formulas. There is rarely time to analyze historical patterns by customer, region, or product, or to model how contract terms and incentive schemes actually impact cash timing. As the business becomes more complex, the gap between the plan and what happens in the bank account grows wider.

The business impact is significant. Inaccurate cash flow forecasts create surprise liquidity gaps, emergency funding needs, or idle cash sitting uninvested. It becomes harder to optimize working capital, financing, and investment decisions. Leadership loses confidence in financial planning because every board meeting brings a new explanation for why actual cash diverged from plan. Over time, this undermines finance’s role as a strategic partner to the business and makes it more difficult to navigate volatile markets.

The good news: this problem is real but absolutely solvable. With the right use of AI for cash flow forecasting, finance teams can connect historical payment behavior, contract details, and operational drivers into one coherent view. At Reruption, we’ve seen how applied AI can transform messy financial data into reliable, scenario-ready insights. In the sections below, you’ll find practical guidance on using Claude to rebuild your cash flow forecasting approach around data, drivers, and dynamic planning.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI-first financial workflows, we’ve seen that Claude is particularly effective when it augments, not replaces, existing planning models. Instead of throwing away your spreadsheets, Claude helps you interpret large ERP exports, reconcile inflows and outflows, and stress-test cash flow projections against realistic payment behavior and scenarios. Our hands-on engineering experience shows that the real value comes from combining Claude’s language understanding with robust financial logic and clear governance.

Treat Claude as a Financial Co-Pilot, Not an Autopilot

Claude is powerful at interpreting complex spreadsheets, contracts, and transaction histories, but it should sit inside a controlled financial planning and analysis process. Use it to surface patterns, inconsistencies, and risks in your cash flow projections, while keeping human finance experts in the loop for judgment calls. This mindset avoids the trap of delegating accountability for liquidity to a black box.

Strategically, define up front which decisions Claude can inform (e.g. revised DSO assumptions by segment, scenario narratives, risk flags) and which remain firmly with your treasury and FP&A teams. Make the AI’s role explicit in your planning calendar so stakeholders understand that the model is a co-pilot improving insight quality, not a replacement for sound financial governance.

Build Around Drivers and Behavior, Not Static Assumptions

Most inaccurate cash flow projections share a root cause: they are based on static, top-down assumptions. A strategic implementation of AI in cash flow planning instead anchors on underlying drivers: customer payment behavior, seasonality, contract terms, discount policies, and operational milestones. Claude is well suited to uncovering and describing these drivers from historical data and narrative inputs.

Before rolling out any tooling, align finance, sales, and operations on which drivers really move cash. Then use Claude to translate those drivers into clear narratives and parameter suggestions that feed your forecasting models. This shifts the organization from a budgeting culture (“what should happen”) to a behavior-based forecasting culture (“what usually happens and why”).

Get Your Data Supply Chain Finance-Ready

Claude can work with messy exports, but the quality of your AI cash flow projections still depends on your data supply chain. Strategically, you need clarity on the authoritative sources for invoices, collections, contract terms, pipeline data, and bank transactions. Equally important is a repeatable way of extracting and anonymizing data so finance can use Claude securely and consistently.

Invest time in defining data ownership (who curates what), refresh frequency (weekly, monthly), and minimum quality thresholds. Reruption often helps clients design lightweight pipelines that feed Claude with ERP exports and planning files, without waiting for a multi-year data lake project. This ensures AI insights are trustworthy enough to influence real liquidity decisions.

Prepare the Team for Narrative-Driven Scenario Planning

Claude’s strength is not just number crunching; it is narrative scenario analysis. Strategically, this shifts how finance collaborates with the business. Instead of presenting one static cash flow plan, your team can co-create several cash flow scenarios with clear, documented assumptions: delayed collections, accelerated growth, pricing changes, or different financing strategies.

To get value from this, prepare stakeholders to think in scenarios, not point estimates. Train finance business partners to prompt Claude with realistic narratives and to use its output to facilitate discussions with management. The organization needs to accept that the goal is not a “perfect forecast” but a robust set of scenarios with transparent logic.

Address Risk, Compliance, and Explainability Upfront

Any use of AI in finance must address risk and compliance from the start. Strategically define where Claude is allowed to see real data, where anonymization is mandatory, and which outputs become part of your official planning cycle. Establish clear guardrails so AI-powered cash flow forecasting remains explainable and auditable.

Put in place a simple model governance framework: documentation of prompts and workflows, versioning of assumptions, and periodic review of forecast accuracy versus actuals. This not only reduces operational risk but also gives controllers and auditors confidence that Claude’s contributions can be traced, challenged, and improved over time.

Used with the right strategy, Claude becomes a powerful lever to turn static, assumption-heavy spreadsheets into dynamic, scenario-ready cash flow projections. It helps finance teams understand real payment behavior, reconcile inconsistencies, and communicate risks and options in clear language to management. Reruption brings the engineering depth and Co-Preneur mindset needed to embed Claude into your existing planning processes, not just as a pilot, but as a reliable part of how you manage liquidity. If you want to explore what this could look like for your finance organization, our team can help you move from idea to working solution quickly and safely.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Healthcare to Banking: Learn how companies successfully use Claude.

Mass General Brigham

Healthcare

Mass General Brigham, one of the largest healthcare systems in the U.S., faced a deluge of medical imaging data from radiology, pathology, and surgical procedures. With millions of scans annually across its 12 hospitals, clinicians struggled with analysis overload, leading to delays in diagnosis and increased burnout rates among radiologists and surgeons. The need for precise, rapid interpretation was critical, as manual reviews limited throughput and risked errors in complex cases like tumor detection or surgical risk assessment. Additionally, operative workflows required better predictive tools. Surgeons needed models to forecast complications, optimize scheduling, and personalize interventions, but fragmented data silos and regulatory hurdles impeded progress. Staff shortages exacerbated these issues, demanding decision support systems to alleviate cognitive load and improve patient outcomes.

Lösung

To address these, Mass General Brigham established a dedicated Artificial Intelligence Center, centralizing research, development, and deployment of hundreds of AI models focused on computer vision for imaging and predictive analytics for surgery. This enterprise-wide initiative integrates ML into clinical workflows, partnering with tech giants like Microsoft for foundation models in medical imaging. Key solutions include deep learning algorithms for automated anomaly detection in X-rays, MRIs, and CTs, reducing radiologist review time. For surgery, predictive models analyze patient data to predict post-op risks, enhancing planning. Robust governance frameworks ensure ethical deployment, addressing bias and explainability.

Ergebnisse

  • $30 million AI investment fund established
  • Hundreds of AI models managed for radiology and pathology
  • Improved diagnostic throughput via AI-assisted radiology
  • AI foundation models developed through Microsoft partnership
  • Initiatives for AI governance in medical imaging deployed
  • Reduced clinician workload and burnout through decision support
Read case study →

Rolls-Royce Holdings

Aerospace

Jet engines are highly complex, operating under extreme conditions with millions of components subject to wear. Airlines faced unexpected failures leading to costly groundings, with unplanned maintenance causing millions in daily losses per aircraft. Traditional scheduled maintenance was inefficient, often resulting in over-maintenance or missed issues, exacerbating downtime and fuel inefficiency. Rolls-Royce needed to predict failures proactively amid vast data from thousands of engines in flight. Challenges included integrating real-time IoT sensor data (hundreds per engine), handling terabytes of telemetry, and ensuring accuracy in predictions to avoid false alarms that could disrupt operations. The aerospace industry's stringent safety regulations added pressure to deliver reliable AI without compromising performance.

Lösung

Rolls-Royce developed the IntelligentEngine platform, combining digital twins—virtual replicas of physical engines—with machine learning models. Sensors stream live data to cloud-based systems, where ML algorithms analyze patterns to predict wear, anomalies, and optimal maintenance windows. Digital twins enable simulation of engine behavior pre- and post-flight, optimizing designs and schedules. Partnerships with Microsoft Azure IoT and Siemens enhanced data processing and VR modeling, scaling AI across Trent series engines like Trent 7000 and 1000. Ethical AI frameworks ensure data security and bias-free predictions.

Ergebnisse

  • 48% increase in time on wing before first removal
  • Doubled Trent 7000 engine time on wing
  • Reduced unplanned downtime by up to 30%
  • Improved fuel efficiency by 1-2% via optimized ops
  • Cut maintenance costs by 20-25% for operators
  • Processed terabytes of real-time data from 1000s of engines
Read case study →

Goldman Sachs

Investment Banking

In the fast-paced investment banking sector, Goldman Sachs employees grapple with overwhelming volumes of repetitive tasks. Daily routines like processing hundreds of emails, writing and debugging complex financial code, and poring over lengthy documents for insights consume up to 40% of work time, diverting focus from high-value activities like client advisory and deal-making. Regulatory constraints exacerbate these issues, as sensitive financial data demands ironclad security, limiting off-the-shelf AI use. Traditional tools fail to scale with the need for rapid, accurate analysis amid market volatility, risking delays in response times and competitive edge.

Lösung

Goldman Sachs countered with a proprietary generative AI assistant, fine-tuned on internal datasets in a secure, private environment. This tool summarizes emails by extracting action items and priorities, generates production-ready code for models like risk assessments, and analyzes documents to highlight key trends and anomalies. Built from early 2023 proofs-of-concept, it leverages custom LLMs to ensure compliance and accuracy, enabling natural language interactions without external data risks. The firm prioritized employee augmentation over replacement, training staff for optimal use.

Ergebnisse

  • Rollout Scale: 10,000 employees in 2024
  • Timeline: PoCs 2023; initial rollout 2024; firmwide 2025
  • Productivity Boost: Routine tasks streamlined, est. 25-40% time savings on emails/coding/docs
  • Adoption: Rapid uptake across tech and front-office teams
  • Strategic Impact: Core to 10-year AI playbook for structural gains
Read case study →

PayPal

Fintech

PayPal processes millions of transactions hourly, facing rapidly evolving fraud tactics from cybercriminals using sophisticated methods like account takeovers, synthetic identities, and real-time attacks. Traditional rules-based systems struggle with false positives and fail to adapt quickly, leading to financial losses exceeding billions annually and eroding customer trust if legitimate payments are blocked . The scale amplifies challenges: with 10+ million transactions per hour, detecting anomalies in real-time requires analyzing hundreds of behavioral, device, and contextual signals without disrupting user experience. Evolving threats like AI-generated fraud demand continuous model retraining, while regulatory compliance adds complexity to balancing security and speed .

Lösung

PayPal implemented deep learning models for anomaly and fraud detection, leveraging machine learning to score transactions in milliseconds by processing over 500 signals including user behavior, IP geolocation, device fingerprinting, and transaction velocity. Models use supervised and unsupervised learning for pattern recognition and outlier detection, continuously retrained on fresh data to counter new fraud vectors . Integration with H2O.ai's Driverless AI accelerated model development, enabling automated feature engineering and deployment. This hybrid AI approach combines deep neural networks for complex pattern learning with ensemble methods, reducing manual intervention and improving adaptability . Real-time inference blocks high-risk payments pre-authorization, while low-risk ones proceed seamlessly .

Ergebnisse

  • 10% improvement in fraud detection accuracy on AI hardware
  • $500M fraudulent transactions blocked per quarter (~$2B annually)
  • AUROC score of 0.94 in fraud models (H2O.ai implementation)
  • 50% reduction in manual review queue
  • Processes 10M+ transactions per hour with <0.4ms latency
  • <0.32% fraud rate on $1.5T+ processed volume
Read case study →

Airbus

Aerospace

In aircraft design, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are essential for predicting airflow around wings, fuselages, and novel configurations critical to fuel efficiency and emissions reduction. However, traditional high-fidelity RANS solvers require hours to days per run on supercomputers, limiting engineers to just a few dozen iterations per design cycle and stifling innovation for next-gen hydrogen-powered aircraft like ZEROe. This computational bottleneck was particularly acute amid Airbus' push for decarbonized aviation by 2035, where complex geometries demand exhaustive exploration to optimize lift-drag ratios while minimizing weight. Collaborations with DLR and ONERA highlighted the need for faster tools, as manual tuning couldn't scale to test thousands of variants needed for laminar flow or blended-wing-body concepts.

Lösung

Machine learning surrogate models, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), were trained on vast CFD datasets to emulate full simulations in milliseconds. Airbus integrated these into a generative design pipeline, where AI predicts pressure fields, velocities, and forces, enforcing Navier-Stokes physics via hybrid loss functions for accuracy. Development involved curating millions of simulation snapshots from legacy runs, GPU-accelerated training, and iterative fine-tuning with experimental wind-tunnel data. This enabled rapid iteration: AI screens designs, high-fidelity CFD verifies top candidates, slashing overall compute by orders of magnitude while maintaining <5% error on key metrics.

Ergebnisse

  • Simulation time: 1 hour → 30 ms (120,000x speedup)
  • Design iterations: +10,000 per cycle in same timeframe
  • Prediction accuracy: 95%+ for lift/drag coefficients
  • 50% reduction in design phase timeline
  • 30-40% fewer high-fidelity CFD runs required
  • Fuel burn optimization: up to 5% improvement in predictions
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Use Claude to Reconstruct Historical Payment Behavior

Start by giving Claude a clear view of how customers actually pay. Export invoice- and payment-level data from your ERP (e.g. invoice date, due date, payment date, amount, customer, region, product line) into a CSV or Excel file. Then load a filtered subset into Claude (respecting your data policies) and ask it to derive behavioral patterns that matter for cash flow.

For example, you can paste a summary table (e.g. customer, average days to pay, standard deviation, seasonality indicators) and use a prompt like:

Act as a senior FP&A analyst.
You receive historical invoice and payment data aggregated by customer.

1. Identify customer segments with systematically slower or faster payment behavior.
2. Highlight clear seasonality in payment timing (e.g. Q4 delays, summer slow-down).
3. Suggest revised DSO / cash collection assumptions per segment that better reflect reality.
4. Output the result as a table with these columns:
   - Segment name
   - Key pattern observed
   - Recommended average days to pay
   - Confidence level (high/medium/low)
   - Comments for the CFO

Use these recommendations as inputs to your forecasting model, while sanity-checking against your own experience. Over time, iterate by feeding Claude more granular views (by region, product, or contract type) to refine your cash flow drivers.

Let Claude Audit and Reconcile Your Existing Cash Flow Model

Most teams already have a spreadsheet-based cash flow forecast that roughly works, but contains hidden inconsistencies. Claude is effective at auditing these workbooks for logical gaps between inflow assumptions, outflow schedules, and actual patterns from the ERP. Export key tabs (summary, AR schedule, AP schedule, key assumptions) into a single, simplified file before sharing.

Then use a prompt like:

You are an expert in corporate cash flow forecasting.
I will share:
- A current 12-month cash flow forecast (by month)
- Underlying assumptions for DSO, DPO, and growth
- A high-level summary of historical payment behavior

Tasks:
1. Identify inconsistencies between the assumptions and historical behavior.
2. Flag any months where the projected net cash position looks unrealistic
   given the business context (e.g. seasonality in orders, known project milestones).
3. Suggest 3-5 specific adjustments to improve realism while
   keeping the model structure unchanged.
4. Provide a short narrative for the CFO explaining the key changes
   and their impact on cash risk.

Implement the recommended adjustments in your spreadsheet, and log them as a change history with rationale. Repeat this audit step as part of your monthly or quarterly planning cadence to keep the model honest.

Build Rolling Cash Flow Forecasts with Structured Prompts

Instead of rebuilding a static 12-month forecast every year, use Claude to help you run a rolling cash flow forecast that extends your current view by one month at each update. Feed Claude with (1) the current forecast file, (2) the last 3–6 months of actuals, and (3) key business updates (pipeline, churn, major contracts, capex plans).

Structure your prompt so Claude explicitly updates assumptions and documents the new baseline:

Act as a rolling cash flow planning assistant.
We have:
- Current monthly cash flow forecast for the next 9 months
- Actual inflows and outflows for the last 6 months
- Notes on major upcoming events (projects, capex, new contracts)

Tasks:
1. Compare actual vs. forecast for the last 3 months and quantify deviations.
2. Update the core assumptions (e.g. DSO, DPO, growth by segment)
   where the deviations are systematic.
3. Propose an updated 12-month rolling forecast, extending the horizon by 3 months.
4. Summarize key assumption changes and their cash impact in bullet points
   suitable for a CFO briefing.

Then manually transfer the updated assumptions and monthly figures into your master planning file. This keeps Claude tightly integrated with your existing process while avoiding uncontrolled changes to the model structure.

Use Claude for Narrative Scenario Analysis and Stress Tests

Claude excels at turning high-level business questions into quantified cash flow scenarios. Use it to run stress tests around late payments, sales slowdowns, or pricing changes. Provide your base case forecast plus a short description of potential shocks, and ask Claude to adjust key drivers and articulate their consequences.

A practical scenario prompt might look like:

You are advising the CFO on liquidity risk.
Base case: The attached monthly cash flow forecast for the next 12 months.

Define and quantify 3 scenarios:
1) Mild downturn: 10% lower revenue, 5 days longer DSO from month 3.
2) Severe downturn: 25% lower revenue, 15 days longer DSO from month 2,
   and 10% of customers delaying payments by 60+ days.
3) Upside: 15% higher revenue with improved DSO due to new collection initiatives.

For each scenario:
- Provide an adjusted monthly cash flow view (high-level is fine).
- Identify the first month where liquidity becomes critical.
- Suggest 3 concrete actions management could take to mitigate cash risk.
- Write a short narrative (max 200 words) to present to the board.

Use these narratives and high-level numbers as input to your internal planning meetings, then refine the details in your main forecasting model.

Standardize Prompts and Outputs into Repeatable Finance Workflows

To move from experimentation to a robust AI-assisted cash planning process, standardize how your team interacts with Claude. Document a small set of approved prompts for recurring tasks: historical analysis, forecast audit, rolling update, and scenario creation. Store them in a shared playbook or within your finance knowledge base.

For each workflow, define the input file structure (e.g. which tabs and columns must be present), the exact Claude prompt, and the expected output format (tables, narratives, bullet points). Over time, you can work with your IT and data teams—or with a partner like Reruption—to wrap these prompts into simple internal tools or scripts so that finance users just click a button instead of copying and pasting.

Track Accuracy and Process Metrics to Prove Value

Finally, treat Claude as part of your performance management system. Track forecast accuracy (e.g. absolute variance between forecasted and actual cash position per month), lead time to produce an updated cash forecast, and number of meaningful scenario discussions with management. Compare these metrics before and after introducing Claude into your cash flow forecasting.

Realistic outcomes many teams see after a disciplined rollout include: 20–40% faster forecast updates, a visible reduction in surprise liquidity gaps, and a structured set of 3–5 standard scenarios used in every board cycle. The exact numbers will depend on your starting point, but the combination of data-driven assumptions and narrative clarity is what consistently shifts finance from reactive explanations to proactive cash management.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude improves cash flow forecast accuracy by connecting your existing models with real payment behavior and contract details. It can analyze ERP exports of invoices and payments, identify segments with systematically late or early payments, and suggest more realistic DSO assumptions per segment. It also reconciles your current forecast with recent actuals, flags inconsistent assumptions, and generates clear narratives explaining where and why cash is likely to deviate from plan.

Instead of relying on one top-down DSO figure for the entire business, finance teams can use Claude to maintain a behavior-based view of collections, seasonality, and contract-specific terms, and embed these drivers back into their planning spreadsheets.

At a minimum, you need access to exports from your ERP or accounting system covering invoices, payments, and basic master data (customer, region, product group). It also helps to have your current cash flow planning file available in a reasonably structured format (tabs for AR, AP, assumptions, and summary).

On the skills side, you do not need data scientists to get started, but you do need finance professionals who understand your current forecasting logic and can sanity-check Claude’s suggestions. Basic "prompt engineering" skills—knowing how to ask structured questions and specify desired output formats—are sufficient. Over time, many organizations add light engineering support to automate data extraction and standardize prompts.

Most finance teams can see tangible benefits within a few weeks if they focus on a specific use case, such as auditing the next quarterly cash flow forecast or building three board-ready scenarios. The initial setup—aligning on data extracts, defining 2–3 core prompts, and running the first analyses—typically fits within a single planning cycle.

Within 1–3 months, you can embed Claude into a regular rolling cash flow forecasting cadence, where each update includes an AI-assisted comparison of forecast vs. actual and a refreshed set of assumptions. Deeper automation (e.g. integrated pipelines, standardized workflows, internal tools) may take longer, but you do not need full automation to get meaningful early wins.

The direct tooling cost for using Claude is usually modest compared to the financial impact of improved cash decisions. The main ROI drivers are: fewer surprise liquidity gaps (and therefore less need for expensive short-term financing), better utilization of excess cash, and reduced manual effort in preparing and reconciling forecasts. Many teams also report qualitative benefits: higher confidence from leadership and more constructive scenario discussions.

To quantify ROI, track metrics such as reduction in forecast error, avoided overdraft or emergency financing costs, and time saved per planning cycle. These benefits typically outweigh the cost of Claude usage and the incremental time spent setting up AI-enabled cash forecasting workflows, especially for organizations with significant working capital tied up in receivables.

Reruption helps finance teams move from idea to working solution quickly. With our AI PoC offering (9.900€), we validate whether Claude can reliably support your specific cash flow use case: we define the use case and metrics with you, test different prompt and data setups, build a functioning prototype that works with your actual ERP exports and planning files, and evaluate performance on speed, quality, and cost per run.

Beyond the PoC, our Co-Preneur approach means we embed with your team to integrate Claude into your planning calendar, design secure data flows, and standardize prompts into repeatable workflows. We focus on real implementation inside your finance organization—working with your spreadsheets, tools, and constraints—so that AI becomes a dependable part of how you plan and manage liquidity, not just a one-off experiment.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media