The Challenge: Slow Knowledge Lookup

In most customer service organisations, agents handle complex requests while juggling multiple tools: CRM, ticketing, knowledge base, policy portals, past tickets and shared drives. When a customer is waiting on the line or in chat, every second spent searching for the right article or troubleshooting step increases pressure. Slow knowledge lookup leads to hesitant answers, longer handle times and more "let me get back to you" moments than anyone would like to admit.

Traditional approaches try to fix this with bigger knowledge bases, more tagging rules, additional training or yet another search interface. But static articles and keyword search simply cannot keep up with the volume and variety of customer questions. Agents rarely use the perfect keyword, content is duplicated across tools, and policies change faster than documentation is updated. The result: agents click through multiple tabs, skim long documents and still end up asking a colleague for help.

The business impact is substantial. Slow knowledge lookup drives up average handle time and reduces first-contact resolution, which in turn increases repeat contacts, escalations and overall support costs. Customers perceive the delay as incompetence or disinterest, even if the agent is doing their best. Over time, this erodes customer satisfaction scores, puts your brand under pressure and forces you to staff more agents than necessary just to manage the same volume. Competitors who can resolve issues faster set a new expectation that is hard to ignore.

The good news: this is a very solvable problem if you approach it differently. Instead of training agents to search better, you can let AI do the searching and summarising for them. At Reruption, we have seen how conversational assistants built on technologies like ChatGPT can turn scattered documentation into instant, contextual answers during live interactions. In the sections below, we break down how to think about this shift, what to watch out for, and how to move from idea to a working solution inside your customer service operation.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption's experience building AI assistants for customer-facing teams, the real bottleneck is rarely agent motivation or knowledge base size — it’s the time it takes to connect a specific question to the right piece of information. ChatGPT can operate as a conversational layer on top of your existing tools, retrieving, combining and summarising content in real time so agents get precise guidance while they talk or chat with customers.

Start from First-Contact Resolution, Not from "Add a ChatGPT Widget"

Many teams start with the technology and ask where to plug it in. For slow knowledge lookup, flip the equation: define what better first-contact resolution looks like in your environment. Which categories of cases most frequently require a follow-up? Where do agents say, "I need to check with another team" or "I'll email you"?

Once you have those patterns, you can scope how ChatGPT as an agent assistant should behave: what systems it must read from, which policies it is allowed to synthesise, and where it must stay silent. This outcome-first mindset ensures you measure success in resolved tickets and shorter handle time, not in "number of AI queries".

Treat Knowledge as a Product, Not as Static Documentation

Deploying ChatGPT on top of a messy knowledge base will not magically fix structural issues. Strategically, you need to treat support knowledge as a living product: owned, maintained and versioned by a clear team. Define which repositories are the single sources of truth for policies, troubleshooting steps, and macros.

With that in place, you can let ChatGPT search across knowledge bases, past tickets and policy docs while still keeping governance. The AI can surface an answer, but your knowledge owners decide which content is in scope and how information is structured. This balance between flexibility and control is critical for regulated industries and complex internal processes.

Design for Human-in-the-Loop, Especially Early On

For customer service, your goal is not full automation from day one. A more realistic and lower-risk strategy is to use ChatGPT as a drafting and research assistant that proposes answers while the agent stays accountable. Early in the rollout, agents should be encouraged to challenge, edit and correct AI output.

This human-in-the-loop design reduces risk of hallucinations, builds trust with frontline teams and creates a feedback loop: when agents correct AI responses, you learn where content is missing or unclear. Over time, you can decide which classes of requests are safe enough for more automation and which should always stay under human control.

Prepare Your Organisation for an AI-First Agent Desktop

Introducing ChatGPT into the agent desktop is not just another tool rollout; it changes how agents think about finding information. They move from "search and click" to "ask and verify". To make this work, invest in mindset and skills: train agents in effective prompting, critical reading of AI answers and when to escalate.

On the leadership side, align KPIs and incentives: if agents are measured purely on speed with no regard for quality, they may over-trust the AI. If they are punished for experimenting, they won't use it. A clear communication that AI is there to augment them, not monitor or replace them, is essential for adoption.

Mitigate Risks with Guardrails, Not Blanket Restrictions

Legitimate concerns about data protection, compliance and brand voice often slow down AI initiatives. A better strategic approach is to define explicit guardrails for ChatGPT in customer service rather than forbidding usage. Restrict the data sources the model can access, log all AI-assisted responses, and define red-line topics where no AI suggestions are shown.

By combining technical controls with policies and enablement, you can capture the benefits of faster knowledge lookup while keeping sensitive information secure and responses compliant. This is where Reruption's focus on Security & Compliance and AI Engineering often makes the difference between a stalled pilot and a solution that leadership can actually sign off.

Using ChatGPT to speed up knowledge lookup in customer service is less about clever prompts and more about rethinking how agents access and trust information during live interactions. With the right guardrails, ownership model and human-in-the-loop design, you can realistically reduce handle times and increase first-contact resolution without sacrificing quality or compliance. Reruption specialises in turning these ideas into working solutions inside real organisations — from scoping and PoC to integration and rollout — so if you want to explore this for your own service team, we’re ready to build it with you, not just talk about it.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Healthcare to News Media: Learn how companies successfully use ChatGPT.

AstraZeneca

Healthcare

In the highly regulated pharmaceutical industry, AstraZeneca faced immense pressure to accelerate drug discovery and clinical trials, which traditionally take 10-15 years and cost billions, with low success rates of under 10%. Data silos, stringent compliance requirements (e.g., FDA regulations), and manual knowledge work hindered efficiency across R&D and business units. Researchers struggled with analyzing vast datasets from 3D imaging, literature reviews, and protocol drafting, leading to delays in bringing therapies to patients. Scaling AI was complicated by data privacy concerns, integration into legacy systems, and ensuring AI outputs were reliable in a high-stakes environment. Without rapid adoption, AstraZeneca risked falling behind competitors leveraging AI for faster innovation toward 2030 ambitions of novel medicines.

Lösung

AstraZeneca launched an enterprise-wide generative AI strategy, deploying ChatGPT Enterprise customized for pharma workflows. This included AI assistants for 3D molecular imaging analysis, automated clinical trial protocol drafting, and knowledge synthesis from scientific literature. They partnered with OpenAI for secure, scalable LLMs and invested in training: ~12,000 employees across R&D and functions completed GenAI programs by mid-2025. Infrastructure upgrades, like AMD Instinct MI300X GPUs, optimized model training. Governance frameworks ensured compliance, with human-in-loop validation for critical tasks. Rollout phased from pilots in 2023-2024 to full scaling in 2025, focusing on R&D acceleration via GenAI for molecule design and real-world evidence analysis.

Ergebnisse

  • ~12,000 employees trained on generative AI by mid-2025
  • 85-93% of staff reported productivity gains
  • 80% of medical writers found AI protocol drafts useful
  • Significant reduction in life sciences model training time via MI300X GPUs
  • High AI maturity ranking per IMD Index (top global)
  • GenAI enabling faster trial design and dose selection
Read case study →

AT&T

Telecommunications

As a leading telecom operator, AT&T manages one of the world's largest and most complex networks, spanning millions of cell sites, fiber optics, and 5G infrastructure. The primary challenges included inefficient network planning and optimization, such as determining optimal cell site placement and spectrum acquisition amid exploding data demands from 5G rollout and IoT growth. Traditional methods relied on manual analysis, leading to suboptimal resource allocation and higher capital expenditures. Additionally, reactive network maintenance caused frequent outages, with anomaly detection lagging behind real-time needs. Detecting and fixing issues proactively was critical to minimize downtime, but vast data volumes from network sensors overwhelmed legacy systems. This resulted in increased operational costs, customer dissatisfaction, and delayed 5G deployment. AT&T needed scalable AI to predict failures, automate healing, and forecast demand accurately.

Lösung

AT&T integrated machine learning and predictive analytics through its AT&T Labs, developing models for network design including spectrum refarming and cell site optimization. AI algorithms analyze geospatial data, traffic patterns, and historical performance to recommend ideal tower locations, reducing build costs. For operations, anomaly detection and self-healing systems use predictive models on NFV (Network Function Virtualization) to forecast failures and automate fixes, like rerouting traffic. Causal AI extends beyond correlations for root-cause analysis in churn and network issues. Implementation involved edge-to-edge intelligence, deploying AI across 100,000+ engineers' workflows.

Ergebnisse

  • Billions of dollars saved in network optimization costs
  • 20-30% improvement in network utilization and efficiency
  • Significant reduction in truck rolls and manual interventions
  • Proactive detection of anomalies preventing major outages
  • Optimized cell site placement reducing CapEx by millions
  • Enhanced 5G forecasting accuracy by up to 40%
Read case study →

Airbus

Aerospace

In aircraft design, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are essential for predicting airflow around wings, fuselages, and novel configurations critical to fuel efficiency and emissions reduction. However, traditional high-fidelity RANS solvers require hours to days per run on supercomputers, limiting engineers to just a few dozen iterations per design cycle and stifling innovation for next-gen hydrogen-powered aircraft like ZEROe. This computational bottleneck was particularly acute amid Airbus' push for decarbonized aviation by 2035, where complex geometries demand exhaustive exploration to optimize lift-drag ratios while minimizing weight. Collaborations with DLR and ONERA highlighted the need for faster tools, as manual tuning couldn't scale to test thousands of variants needed for laminar flow or blended-wing-body concepts.

Lösung

Machine learning surrogate models, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), were trained on vast CFD datasets to emulate full simulations in milliseconds. Airbus integrated these into a generative design pipeline, where AI predicts pressure fields, velocities, and forces, enforcing Navier-Stokes physics via hybrid loss functions for accuracy. Development involved curating millions of simulation snapshots from legacy runs, GPU-accelerated training, and iterative fine-tuning with experimental wind-tunnel data. This enabled rapid iteration: AI screens designs, high-fidelity CFD verifies top candidates, slashing overall compute by orders of magnitude while maintaining <5% error on key metrics.

Ergebnisse

  • Simulation time: 1 hour → 30 ms (120,000x speedup)
  • Design iterations: +10,000 per cycle in same timeframe
  • Prediction accuracy: 95%+ for lift/drag coefficients
  • 50% reduction in design phase timeline
  • 30-40% fewer high-fidelity CFD runs required
  • Fuel burn optimization: up to 5% improvement in predictions
Read case study →

Amazon

Retail

In the vast e-commerce landscape, online shoppers face significant hurdles in product discovery and decision-making. With millions of products available, customers often struggle to find items matching their specific needs, compare options, or get quick answers to nuanced questions about features, compatibility, and usage. Traditional search bars and static listings fall short, leading to shopping cart abandonment rates as high as 70% industry-wide and prolonged decision times that frustrate users. Amazon, serving over 300 million active customers, encountered amplified challenges during peak events like Prime Day, where query volumes spiked dramatically. Shoppers demanded personalized, conversational assistance akin to in-store help, but scaling human support was impossible. Issues included handling complex, multi-turn queries, integrating real-time inventory and pricing data, and ensuring recommendations complied with safety and accuracy standards amid a $500B+ catalog.

Lösung

Amazon developed Rufus, a generative AI-powered conversational shopping assistant embedded in the Amazon Shopping app and desktop. Rufus leverages a custom-built large language model (LLM) fine-tuned on Amazon's product catalog, customer reviews, and web data, enabling natural, multi-turn conversations to answer questions, compare products, and provide tailored recommendations. Powered by Amazon Bedrock for scalability and AWS Trainium/Inferentia chips for efficient inference, Rufus scales to millions of sessions without latency issues. It incorporates agentic capabilities for tasks like cart addition, price tracking, and deal hunting, overcoming prior limitations in personalization by accessing user history and preferences securely. Implementation involved iterative testing, starting with beta in February 2024, expanding to all US users by September, and global rollouts, addressing hallucination risks through grounding techniques and human-in-loop safeguards.

Ergebnisse

  • 60% higher purchase completion rate for Rufus users
  • $10B projected additional sales from Rufus
  • 250M+ customers used Rufus in 2025
  • Monthly active users up 140% YoY
  • Interactions surged 210% YoY
  • Black Friday sales sessions +100% with Rufus
  • 149% jump in Rufus users recently
Read case study →

American Eagle Outfitters

Apparel Retail

In the competitive apparel retail landscape, American Eagle Outfitters faced significant hurdles in fitting rooms, where customers crave styling advice, accurate sizing, and complementary item suggestions without waiting for overtaxed associates . Peak-hour staff shortages often resulted in frustrated shoppers abandoning carts, low try-on rates, and missed conversion opportunities, as traditional in-store experiences lagged behind personalized e-commerce . Early efforts like beacon technology in 2014 doubled fitting room entry odds but lacked depth in real-time personalization . Compounding this, data silos between online and offline hindered unified customer insights, making it tough to match items to individual style preferences, body types, or even skin tones dynamically. American Eagle needed a scalable solution to boost engagement and loyalty in flagship stores while experimenting with AI for broader impact .

Lösung

American Eagle partnered with Aila Technologies to deploy interactive fitting room kiosks powered by computer vision and machine learning, rolled out in 2019 at flagship locations in Boston, Las Vegas, and San Francisco . Customers scan garments via iOS devices, triggering CV algorithms to identify items and ML models—trained on purchase history and Google Cloud data—to suggest optimal sizes, colors, and outfit complements tailored to inferred style and preferences . Integrated with Google Cloud's ML capabilities, the system enables real-time recommendations, associate alerts for assistance, and seamless inventory checks, evolving from beacon lures to a full smart assistant . This experimental approach, championed by CMO Craig Brommers, fosters an AI culture for personalization at scale .

Ergebnisse

  • Double-digit conversion gains from AI personalization
  • 11% comparable sales growth for Aerie brand Q3 2025
  • 4% overall comparable sales increase Q3 2025
  • 29% EPS growth to $0.53 Q3 2025
  • Doubled fitting room try-on odds via early tech
  • Record Q3 revenue of $1.36B
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Embed ChatGPT Directly into the Agent Desktop

The biggest time savings come when ChatGPT is available in the same screen agents already use for tickets, chats or calls. Instead of forcing agents to switch tools, embed an assistant panel in your CRM or contact center UI via API or existing integrations.

Configure the assistant to automatically receive context: ticket title, customer type, product, and recent interaction history. This allows ChatGPT to propose more accurate answers without agents retyping everything. A typical configuration sequence looks like:

1. When a ticket is opened, send to ChatGPT API:
   - Issue summary
   - Product line
   - Customer segment
   - Language
2. Retrieve a draft answer plus 3-5 knowledge references
3. Display in the sidebar for agent review and editing
4. Log which suggestions were accepted or modified

Expected outcome: reduced tab-switching and faster time-to-first-response, especially in email and chat channels.

Use Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) Over Your Knowledge Base

To avoid hallucinations and ensure answers reflect your current policies, implement retrieval-augmented generation: ChatGPT should first search your internal content, then generate an answer based only on the retrieved snippets. This can be done by indexing knowledge base articles, FAQs, internal playbooks and even anonymised past tickets.

At query time, retrieve the most relevant pieces and pass them to ChatGPT with clear instructions:

System prompt example:
"You are a customer service assistant for <Company>.
Use ONLY the provided reference documents to answer.
If the answer is not clearly covered, say you don't know
and suggest next diagnostic steps for the agent."

User prompt example:
"Customer issue:
<ticket description>

Relevant documents:
<top 5 text chunks from KB, policies, past tickets>

Task:
- Summarise the root cause
- Suggest 3 concise response options
- List any missing information the agent should ask for"

Expected outcome: higher answer accuracy, fewer compliance issues, and more consistent responses across agents.

Standardise Agent Prompts for Common Case Types

While agents can freely ask ChatGPT anything, you’ll get more reliable results by providing standard prompt templates for your top 10–20 case categories (billing, shipping, login issues, product configuration, etc.). These templates ensure the assistant consistently covers diagnostic questions, steps and wording.

Publish these directly in the ChatGPT panel so agents can insert and adapt them with one click:

Example prompt: Billing dispute

"You are assisting a customer service agent handling a billing dispute.

Context:
- Customer summary: <paste from CRM>
- Invoice details: <paste or link>
- Customer message: <paste>

Tasks:
1) Identify the likely cause of the dispute.
2) Draft a reply in our brand tone: calm, clear, apologetic when appropriate.
3) List the internal checks the agent should perform before sending.
4) Suggest how to document this interaction in the ticket notes."

Expected outcome: more consistent communication quality and fewer missed steps in complex scenarios.

Auto-Summarise Long Tickets and Call Notes into Actionable Next Steps

Slow knowledge lookup is often worsened by long, unstructured case history. Use ChatGPT to summarise previous interactions into crisp overviews and recommended next actions so agents can orient themselves within seconds.

For follow-up contacts, trigger an auto-summarisation workflow that compiles the history for the current agent:

Example summarisation prompt:

"You receive a follow-up from a customer.
Here is the case history (chronological):
<concatenated past emails, chats, notes>

Summarise for the agent:
- 3-sentence situation overview
- What has already been tried
- What the customer expects now
- 2-3 recommended next steps within our policies"

Expected outcome: reduced time spent reading old notes, lower risk of repeating previous troubleshooting, and smoother handovers between agents or tiers.

Implement Real-Time "Whisper" Suggestions During Live Chats

In chat channels, you can let ChatGPT propose real-time response suggestions as the conversation unfolds, without sending anything directly to the customer. The agent sees suggestions, edits them and sends the final version. This keeps control with the agent while drastically speeding up typing.

Configure your chat platform to send each new customer message plus short context (last 5–10 turns, product, sentiment if available) to ChatGPT and request 1–3 variants:

Example live chat prompt:

"You are helping an agent respond in a live chat.

Chat history (latest last):
<last 8 messages>

Task:
1) Draft 2 short reply options in a friendly, professional tone.
2) Make sure to:
   - Acknowledge the customer's concern
   - Avoid overpromising
   - Offer a concrete next step or question
3) Keep each reply under 3 sentences."

Expected outcome: faster replies, more consistent tone of voice, and lower cognitive load on agents during peak times.

Instrument the Assistant with Clear KPIs and Feedback Loops

To move from "nice demo" to real business value, track how ChatGPT-assisted workflows affect your core metrics. Start with: average handle time, first-contact resolution rate, number of internal escalations, and agent satisfaction with the tool.

Implement lightweight feedback controls inside the assistant (e.g., "Was this suggestion helpful? Yes/No" plus a comment field). Use this data to refine prompts, improve knowledge content, and decide where more automation is safe. A realistic target after a few months of iteration might be:

Expected outcomes: 10–25% reduction in handle time for targeted case types, 5–15% increase in first-contact resolution where knowledge was previously hard to find, and measurable improvement in agent-reported ease of finding information. These numbers depend on your starting point, but with disciplined implementation and iteration, they are achievable.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

ChatGPT reduces lookup time by acting as a single conversational interface on top of your existing knowledge sources: knowledge bases, policies, past tickets and internal docs. Instead of searching across multiple tools, agents describe the customer issue in natural language and get a synthesised answer plus relevant references in seconds.

Using retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), ChatGPT can first retrieve the most relevant documents from your systems, then summarise them into a clear, case-specific response. This turns "find the right article and read it" into "review and adjust a ready-made answer", which is much faster during live calls and chats.

At a minimum, you need: (1) access to your existing knowledge sources (KB, policy docs, FAQs, ticket history), (2) a way to embed or integrate ChatGPT into your agent desktop or CRM, and (3) basic telemetry to measure impact on handle time and first-contact resolution.

On the skills side, you need someone who understands your support processes, someone who owns the knowledge base, and technical capability to handle API integration and security. Reruption usually brings the AI Engineering and AI Strategy expertise, while your team provides process knowledge and content ownership. Non-technical agents do not need programming skills — a short enablement on how to use the assistant and evaluate answers is sufficient.

With a focused scope, you can see early impact surprisingly fast. A typical pattern we see is:

  • 2–4 weeks: Define use cases, connect a subset of knowledge sources, and build an initial ChatGPT-powered assistant for a limited group of agents.
  • 4–8 weeks: Iterate on prompts, guardrails and UX based on real usage, and start tracking impact on selected queues (e.g. technical support for one product line).
  • 8–12 weeks: Roll out to broader teams, refine knowledge content based on feedback, and lock in improvements to handle time and first-contact resolution.

Meaningful, statistically clear improvements often appear within 1–3 months for the targeted case types, provided you instrument the solution with proper metrics and run it on real volume.

The cost structure has three components: (1) one-time engineering and integration effort, (2) ongoing maintenance of your knowledge content and prompts, and (3) usage-based AI costs (API calls or platform fees). For most customer service teams, the variable AI cost per interaction is low compared to agent time.

ROI primarily comes from reduced handle time, higher first-contact resolution (fewer repeat contacts) and less time spent on manual knowledge lookup or asking colleagues. Even modest improvements — for example, a 10% handle time reduction on a high-volume queue — can pay back the investment quickly. We typically model ROI jointly with clients in the PoC phase so expectations are concrete and tied to their actual volumes and costs.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur, meaning we don’t just advise — we co-build the solution inside your organisation. Our AI PoC offering (9,900€) is designed to answer exactly the question: "Does this use case work for us in practice?" For slow knowledge lookup in customer service, that usually means delivering a working prototype assistant that searches your real knowledge, suggests answers to agents and can be tested on live or historical tickets.

We handle use-case definition, feasibility checks, rapid prototyping, and performance evaluation, then turn the PoC into a concrete implementation roadmap. Beyond the PoC, we support integration into your agent desktop, security and compliance hardening, and enablement of your support teams so the assistant becomes part of daily operations — not just a demo.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media