The Challenge: Missing Customer Context

Customer service teams are expected to resolve complex issues on the first contact, yet agents often start calls and chats almost blind. They lack a unified view of the customer’s recent interactions, products in use, open tickets or orders, and previous troubleshooting steps. The result: generic questions, duplicated diagnostics, and answers that don’t fully match the customer’s real situation.

Traditional approaches rely on agents manually clicking through CRM records, ticket histories, email threads, and order systems while talking to the customer. In practice, nobody has that much time during a live call or chat. Even with knowledge bases and scripts, context remains scattered across tools. As volumes grow and products become more complex, the “just search harder” approach falls apart — especially in omnichannel environments with phone, chat, email and self-service.

The business impact is significant. Low first-contact resolution drives repeat contacts, higher staffing needs and longer queues. Customers become frustrated when they have to repeat information or when the first answer doesn’t fit their actual setup, leading to churn and negative word-of-mouth. Internally, senior experts get overloaded with avoidable escalations, and leadership loses visibility into what is really happening across customer journeys because data is fragmented.

This challenge is real, but it is solvable. With modern AI for customer service, you can automatically compile the relevant customer context from tools like Google Workspace, CRM and ticketing systems and surface it to agents in real time. At Reruption, we’ve seen how well-designed AI assistance changes live conversations: agents feel prepared, customers feel understood, and first-contact resolution improves. Below, we’ll walk through concrete ways to use Gemini to fix missing customer context in a pragmatic, low-risk way.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building real-world AI customer service solutions, we’ve seen that Gemini is most valuable when it becomes the connective tissue between your existing tools, not another standalone app. By connecting Gemini to Google Workspace, CRM, and ticketing systems, you can automatically assemble a unified customer timeline and feed that intelligence directly into the agent workflow. The key is to approach this strategically: define what “good context” means for your use case, decide how much autonomy you give Gemini, and design guardrails so agents can trust and act on the insights.

Define What “Customer Context” Means for Your Business

Before integrating Gemini into customer service, you need a clear definition of what agents actually need to see to resolve issues on first contact. For some teams, this may be the last three tickets plus the current product and plan. For others, it includes device configurations, key emails, and recent self-service actions. If this is not explicit, your AI integration will mirror existing ambiguity and clutter agents with noise instead of insight.

Work with your service leaders and top-performing agents to list the information they wish they had at the start of every interaction. Translate this into concrete data sources (e.g., CRM objects, ticket fields, email labels, knowledge base entries). This alignment gives Gemini a clear target for what to summarize and prioritize in its customer context view, which directly supports higher first-contact resolution.

Treat Gemini as a Copilot, Not an Autonomous Agent

Strategically, the fastest path to value is to position Gemini as an agent copilot that surfaces context and recommendations — while the human agent remains in control. Full automation of customer interactions may be tempting, but it introduces higher risk, complex exception handling, and heavier compliance requirements from day one.

Start with a model where Gemini prepares the context summary, suggests next best actions and highlights potential risks, but the agent validates and decides. This reduces change resistance, simplifies governance, and gives you time to calibrate Gemini’s behavior based on feedback. Over time, you can selectively automate well-understood, low-risk workflows while keeping humans in the loop for complex or regulated cases.

Prepare Your Data Foundations and Access Model

Missing customer context is often a symptom of fragmented data and unclear access rules. A strategic Gemini rollout must consider where relevant data lives (Google Workspace, CRM, ticketing, order systems) and how it can be accessed securely. If permissions are inconsistent across tools, Gemini may either miss critical information or surface content agents shouldn’t see.

Invest in aligning data structures and access policies before or alongside your Gemini integration. Define which user roles can see which parts of the unified customer timeline, and ensure auditability. This avoids later conflicts with legal, security and works councils, and establishes trust that AI-powered customer insights are both useful and compliant.

Design for Agent Adoption, Not Just Technical Integration

From an organizational perspective, the biggest risk is deploying Gemini as a side-tool that agents ignore under time pressure. To avoid this, design the experience so that Gemini’s customer context appears exactly where agents already work — inside the ticket view, phone toolbar, or chat console. Make it faster to glance at the AI-generated summary than to search manually.

Involve frontline agents early: run co-design sessions where they react to mock-ups of the context panel, test different levels of detail, and define how suggestions should be phrased. This increases adoption and ensures that Gemini speaks the language of your customers and your brand, not generic AI-speak. Complement this with targeted enablement so agents understand what Gemini can and cannot do.

Plan for Continuous Calibration and Governance

Strategically, AI in customer service should be treated as a living capability, not a one-off project. Your products, processes, and policies change; so must Gemini’s understanding of what good support looks like. Without ongoing calibration, the quality of context summaries and suggested resolutions will drift over time.

Set up a small cross-functional governance loop including customer service, IT, and data/AI stakeholders. Review a sample of interactions regularly: Is Gemini surfacing the right history? Does it miss new product lines or policies? Are there failure modes that need new guardrails? This continuous improvement mindset turns Gemini from an experiment into a reliable part of your service operating model.

Used strategically, Gemini can turn fragmented records into actionable customer context that sits in front of agents at the exact moment they need it. The result is fewer repetitive questions, more accurate answers, and a measurable boost in first-contact resolution. At Reruption, we combine hands-on AI engineering with a deep understanding of service operations to design Gemini integrations that your agents actually use and trust. If you want to explore what this could look like in your environment, we’re happy to help you scope and test it in a focused, low-risk way.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Healthcare to Financial Services: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

UC San Diego Health

Healthcare

Sepsis, a life-threatening condition, poses a major threat in emergency departments, with delayed detection contributing to high mortality rates—up to 20-30% in severe cases. At UC San Diego Health, an academic medical center handling over 1 million patient visits annually, nonspecific early symptoms made timely intervention challenging, exacerbating outcomes in busy ERs . A randomized study highlighted the need for proactive tools beyond traditional scoring systems like qSOFA. Hospital capacity management and patient flow were further strained post-COVID, with bed shortages leading to prolonged admission wait times and transfer delays. Balancing elective surgeries, emergencies, and discharges required real-time visibility . Safely integrating generative AI, such as GPT-4 in Epic, risked data privacy breaches and inaccurate clinical advice . These issues demanded scalable AI solutions to predict risks, streamline operations, and responsibly adopt emerging tech without compromising care quality.

Lösung

UC San Diego Health implemented COMPOSER, a deep learning model trained on electronic health records to predict sepsis risk up to 6-12 hours early, triggering Epic Best Practice Advisory (BPA) alerts for nurses . This quasi-experimental approach across two ERs integrated seamlessly with workflows . Mission Control, an AI-powered operations command center funded by $22M, uses predictive analytics for real-time bed assignments, patient transfers, and capacity forecasting, reducing bottlenecks . Led by Chief Health AI Officer Karandeep Singh, it leverages data from Epic for holistic visibility. For generative AI, pilots with Epic's GPT-4 enable NLP queries and automated patient replies, governed by strict safety protocols to mitigate hallucinations and ensure HIPAA compliance . This multi-faceted strategy addressed detection, flow, and innovation challenges.

Ergebnisse

  • Sepsis in-hospital mortality: 17% reduction
  • Lives saved annually: 50 across two ERs
  • Sepsis bundle compliance: Significant improvement
  • 72-hour SOFA score change: Reduced deterioration
  • ICU encounters: Decreased post-implementation
  • Patient throughput: Improved via Mission Control
Read case study →

Walmart (Marketplace)

Retail

In the cutthroat arena of Walmart Marketplace, third-party sellers fiercely compete for the Buy Box, which accounts for the majority of sales conversions . These sellers manage vast inventories but struggle with manual pricing adjustments, which are too slow to keep pace with rapidly shifting competitor prices, demand fluctuations, and market trends. This leads to frequent loss of the Buy Box, missed sales opportunities, and eroded profit margins in a platform where price is the primary battleground . Additionally, sellers face data overload from monitoring thousands of SKUs, predicting optimal price points, and balancing competitiveness against profitability. Traditional static pricing strategies fail in this dynamic e-commerce environment, resulting in suboptimal performance and requiring excessive manual effort—often hours daily per seller . Walmart recognized the need for an automated solution to empower sellers and drive platform growth.

Lösung

Walmart launched the Repricer, a free AI-driven automated pricing tool integrated into Seller Center, leveraging generative AI for decision support alongside machine learning models like sequential decision intelligence to dynamically adjust prices in real-time . The tool analyzes competitor pricing, historical sales data, demand signals, and market conditions to recommend and implement optimal prices that maximize Buy Box eligibility and sales velocity . Complementing this, the Pricing Insights dashboard provides account-level metrics and AI-generated recommendations, including suggested prices for promotions, helping sellers identify opportunities without manual analysis . For advanced users, third-party tools like Biviar's AI repricer—commissioned by Walmart—enhance this with reinforcement learning for profit-maximizing daily pricing decisions . This ecosystem shifts sellers from reactive to proactive pricing strategies.

Ergebnisse

  • 25% increase in conversion rates from dynamic AI pricing
  • Higher Buy Box win rates through real-time competitor analysis
  • Maximized sales velocity for 3rd-party sellers on Marketplace
  • 850 million catalog data improvements via GenAI (broader impact)
  • 40%+ conversion boost potential from AI-driven offers
  • Reduced manual pricing time by hours daily per seller
Read case study →

Cruise (GM)

Automotive

Developing a self-driving taxi service in dense urban environments posed immense challenges for Cruise. Complex scenarios like unpredictable pedestrians, erratic cyclists, construction zones, and adverse weather demanded near-perfect perception and decision-making in real-time. Safety was paramount, as any failure could result in accidents, regulatory scrutiny, or public backlash. Early testing revealed gaps in handling edge cases, such as emergency vehicles or occluded objects, requiring robust AI to exceed human driver performance. A pivotal safety incident in October 2023 amplified these issues: a Cruise vehicle struck a pedestrian pushed into its path by a hit-and-run driver, then dragged her while fleeing the scene, leading to suspension of operations nationwide. This exposed vulnerabilities in post-collision behavior, sensor fusion under chaos, and regulatory compliance. Scaling to commercial robotaxi fleets while achieving zero at-fault incidents proved elusive amid $10B+ investments from GM.

Lösung

Cruise addressed these with an integrated AI stack leveraging computer vision for perception and reinforcement learning for planning. Lidar, radar, and 30+ cameras fed into CNNs and transformers for object detection, semantic segmentation, and scene prediction, processing 360° views at high fidelity even in low light or rain. Reinforcement learning optimized trajectory planning and behavioral decisions, trained on millions of simulated miles to handle rare events. End-to-end neural networks refined motion forecasting, while simulation frameworks accelerated iteration without real-world risk. Post-incident, Cruise enhanced safety protocols, resuming supervised testing in 2024 with improved disengagement rates. GM's pivot integrated this tech into Super Cruise evolution for personal vehicles.

Ergebnisse

  • 1,000,000+ miles driven fully autonomously by 2023
  • 5 million driverless miles used for AI model training
  • $10B+ cumulative investment by GM in Cruise (2016-2024)
  • 30,000+ miles per intervention in early unsupervised tests
  • Operations suspended Oct 2023; resumed supervised May 2024
  • Zero commercial robotaxi revenue; pivoted Dec 2024
Read case study →

Tesla, Inc.

Automotive

The automotive industry faces a staggering 94% of traffic accidents attributed to human error, including distraction, fatigue, and poor judgment, resulting in over 1.3 million global road deaths annually. In the US alone, NHTSA data shows an average of one crash per 670,000 miles driven, highlighting the urgent need for advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) to enhance safety and reduce fatalities. Tesla encountered specific hurdles in scaling vision-only autonomy, ditching radar and lidar for camera-based systems reliant on AI to mimic human perception. Challenges included variable AI performance in diverse conditions like fog, night, or construction zones, regulatory scrutiny over misleading Level 2 labeling despite Level 4-like demos, and ensuring robust driver monitoring to prevent over-reliance. Past incidents and studies criticized inconsistent computer vision reliability.

Lösung

Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) Supervised leverage end-to-end deep learning neural networks trained on billions of real-world miles, processing camera feeds for perception, prediction, and control without modular rules. Transitioning from HydraNet (multi-task learning for 30+ outputs) to pure end-to-end models, FSD v14 achieves door-to-door driving via video-based imitation learning. Overcoming challenges, Tesla scaled data collection from its fleet of 6M+ vehicles, using Dojo supercomputers for training on petabytes of video. Vision-only approach cuts costs vs. lidar rivals, with recent upgrades like new cameras addressing edge cases. Regulatory pushes target unsupervised FSD by end-2025, with China approval eyed for 2026.

Ergebnisse

  • Autopilot Crash Rate: 1 per 6.36M miles (Q3 2025)
  • Safety Multiple: 9x safer than US average (670K miles/crash)
  • Fleet Data: Billions of miles for training
  • FSD v14: Door-to-door autonomy achieved
  • Q2 2025: 1 crash per 6.69M miles
  • 2024 Q4 Record: 5.94M miles between accidents
Read case study →

Ooredoo (Qatar)

Telecommunications

Ooredoo Qatar, Qatar's leading telecom operator, grappled with the inefficiencies of manual Radio Access Network (RAN) optimization and troubleshooting. As 5G rollout accelerated, traditional methods proved time-consuming and unscalable , struggling to handle surging data demands, ensure seamless connectivity, and maintain high-quality user experiences amid complex network dynamics . Performance issues like dropped calls, variable data speeds, and suboptimal resource allocation required constant human intervention, driving up operating expenses (OpEx) and delaying resolutions. With Qatar's National Digital Transformation agenda pushing for advanced 5G capabilities, Ooredoo needed a proactive, intelligent approach to RAN management without compromising network reliability .

Lösung

Ooredoo partnered with Ericsson to deploy cloud-native Ericsson Cognitive Software on Microsoft Azure, featuring a digital twin of the RAN combined with deep reinforcement learning (DRL) for AI-driven optimization . This solution creates a virtual network replica to simulate scenarios, analyze vast RAN data in real-time, and generate proactive tuning recommendations . The Ericsson Performance Optimizers suite was trialed in 2022, evolving into full deployment by 2023, enabling automated issue resolution and performance enhancements while integrating seamlessly with Ooredoo's 5G infrastructure . Recent expansions include energy-saving PoCs, further leveraging AI for sustainable operations .

Ergebnisse

  • 15% reduction in radio power consumption (Energy Saver PoC)
  • Proactive RAN optimization reducing troubleshooting time
  • Maintained high user experience during power savings
  • Reduced operating expenses via automated resolutions
  • Enhanced 5G subscriber experience with seamless connectivity
  • 10% spectral efficiency gains (Ericsson AI RAN benchmarks)
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Connect Gemini to Your Core Customer Service Systems

The first tactical step is to connect Gemini to the systems where your customer context lives: Google Workspace (Gmail, Docs, Drive), your CRM, and your ticketing platform. Work with IT to set up secure API connections and service accounts that allow Gemini to read relevant data, respecting existing permissions and data protection rules.

Start with read-only access and a narrow scope: for example, only current opportunities and the last 6–12 months of tickets, plus customer-facing email threads. This is typically enough for Gemini to build useful unified customer timelines without introducing unnecessary risk. Document the data sources and fields you connect so you can later trace where each piece of the AI-generated context originates.

Configure a Standard “Customer Context” Prompt Template

To ensure consistent output quality, define a standard prompt template that Gemini uses whenever an agent opens or updates a case. This template should instruct Gemini which sources to consult and how to structure the context summary so agents can scan it quickly.

Example configuration using a system-level prompt:

You are a customer service copilot for our agents.
When given a customer identifier (email, customer ID, or ticket ID), you will:
1) Retrieve relevant information from:
   - CRM records (account, contact, products, contracts, SLAs)
   - Ticketing history (last 5 tickets, status, resolutions)
   - Recent customer emails or chats stored in Google Workspace
2) Produce a concise context summary in this structure:
   - Profile: who the customer is, segment, key products
   - Recent interactions: last 3–5 contacts with channels, topics, sentiment
   - Open issues: current tickets, orders, or escalations
   - Risk & opportunity signals: churn risk, upsell/cross-sell hints (if any)
3) Highlight anything the agent MUST check before answering.

Constraints:
- Max 200 words
- Use bullet points
- If information is missing, state clearly what is unknown instead of guessing.

Once this is in place, integrate the prompt into your agent tools via a button or automatic trigger so agents get a standardized, reliable customer context summary at the start of each interaction.

Embed Gemini Context Panels Directly into Agent Workflows

To fix missing customer context in practice, the AI-generated view needs to sit inside the tools agents already use. Work with your ticketing/CRM admins to add a Gemini-powered context panel to the main case view or phone interface. This might be implemented via a side panel, iframe, or extension depending on your stack.

Design the panel to include at least three sections: a short summary (max 5 bullet points), a timeline of recent interactions, and a list of open issues. Allow agents to expand sections for more detail but keep the default view minimal to reduce cognitive load. Track usage (e.g., panel opens per ticket) to verify adoption and iterate on the layout and content based on feedback.

Use Gemini to Suggest Next Best Actions and Knowledge Articles

Beyond showing history, configure Gemini to recommend the most likely next best actions and relevant knowledge articles based on the customer’s context and the current issue description. This directly supports higher first-contact resolution by guiding less experienced agents through complex cases.

Example prompt for next-step suggestions:

You are assisting a customer service agent.
Given the following inputs:
- Customer context summary
- Current ticket description
- Available knowledge base articles (titles & short descriptions)

Perform these steps:
1) Infer the most likely root cause or category of the issue.
2) Suggest 2–3 next best actions the agent should take, in order.
3) Recommend up to 3 relevant knowledge base articles with a short explanation
   of why each is relevant.
4) Flag if the case likely requires escalation, and to which team.

Output in structured bullet points that an agent can follow during a live call.

Integrate this into your interface as a "Suggested steps" section that refreshes when the ticket description changes. Agents gain a guided workflow that adapts to the specific customer, not just the generic issue type.

Enable Real-Time Call and Chat Support Summaries

Use Gemini to transcribe and summarize live calls or ongoing chats in real time, then feed insights back into the same context panel. This helps agents avoid asking the same questions twice and keeps them aware of what has already been promised or tried, even in longer conversations or transfers.

Configure a workflow where, every few minutes, the latest transcript snippet is sent to Gemini with an instruction to update the working summary and action list. For example:

You are tracking a live customer service interaction.
Given the existing context summary and the latest transcript segment,
update:
- What has been clarified about the customer's situation
- Steps already taken in this interaction
- Any new risks, commitments, or follow-up items

Return an updated summary of max 150 words and a bullet list of
"Already done in this interaction".

This gives agents a dynamic view of the conversation, reduces handover friction between agents, and ensures all relevant details end up in the final case notes automatically.

Measure Impact with Focused Customer Service KPIs

Finally, set up a simple but rigorous measurement framework to validate that Gemini is actually improving first-contact resolution and not just adding another widget. Define a test group of agents using Gemini context panels and a control group that continues working as before, and compare key metrics over 4–8 weeks.

Track KPIs such as first-contact resolution rate, average handle time, number of repeat contacts within 7 days, and escalation rate. Complement this with qualitative feedback from agents: Do they feel better prepared? Which parts of the context summary are most useful? Use these insights to refine prompts, UI, and data connections. Many organisations see realistic improvements like 10–20% higher FCR on targeted issue types and noticeable reductions in escalations once the workflows are tuned.

Implemented thoughtfully, these practices allow Gemini to deliver concrete outcomes: fewer repeat calls, shorter diagnostics, and agents who can confidently resolve more issues on the first contact. By starting with targeted workflows and measurable KPIs, you can scale AI support in customer service based on proven impact rather than assumptions.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini connects to your existing tools — such as Google Workspace, CRM, and ticketing systems — and uses AI to compile all relevant information into a single, concise view for the agent. Instead of clicking through emails, tickets and order histories, the agent sees a unified summary of who the customer is, what products they use, their recent interactions and any open issues.

This context can be generated automatically when a call starts or a chat opens, so the agent begins the interaction with a full picture. That’s what enables more accurate answers and higher first-contact resolution, without asking customers to repeat information they’ve already provided.

You’ll typically need three capabilities: access to your customer service systems (Google Workspace, CRM, ticketing), someone who can work with APIs or integrations, and a product/operations owner from customer service. The technical work involves configuring secure data connections and embedding Gemini outputs into your agent tools; it doesn’t require building complex AI models from scratch.

On the business side, you need service leaders and experienced agents to define what “good context” looks like and to test early versions. Reruption often forms a joint team with clients — combining your process and domain expertise with our AI engineering and prompt design — to get from idea to working prototype quickly.

If the scope is focused (e.g. one region or support queue), you can usually get to a first working prototype of Gemini-powered customer context within a few weeks. Our AI PoC approach is designed to deliver a functioning prototype plus performance metrics in a short time frame, so you can validate whether it improves agent experience and first-contact resolution.

Measurable impact on KPIs such as first-contact resolution rate and repeat contacts often becomes visible within 4–8 weeks of live use, once agents are familiar with the tool and prompts are fine-tuned based on real interactions.

Costs break down into three components: Gemini usage (API or workspace-related), integration and engineering work, and ongoing optimisation. The AI usage cost is typically modest compared to the value if you target high-volume interactions. Integration cost depends on your system landscape and how deeply you want Gemini embedded into your workflows.

ROI for AI in customer service usually comes from fewer repeat contacts, reduced escalations, and shorter handling times — all of which reduce cost per contact and free capacity. There is also a customer experience upside through faster, more accurate resolutions. A focused PoC helps you quantify these effects on a small scale before deciding on broader rollout investments.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur alongside your team: we don’t just advise, we help build and ship working solutions. Our AI PoC offering (9,900€) is specifically designed to prove whether a use case like "Gemini for unified customer context" works in your environment. We define the use case, check feasibility, build a prototype that connects to your real tools, and evaluate performance on speed, quality and cost.

Beyond the PoC, we support with hands-on AI engineering, security & compliance, and enablement so that Gemini becomes a stable part of your customer service operations. Because we embed into your organisation and operate in your P&L, we stay focused on tangible results such as higher first-contact resolution, not just slideware.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media