The Challenge: Missing Customer Context

Customer service teams are expected to resolve complex issues on the first contact, yet agents often start calls and chats almost blind. They lack a unified view of the customer’s recent interactions, products in use, open tickets or orders, and previous troubleshooting steps. The result: generic questions, duplicated diagnostics, and answers that don’t fully match the customer’s real situation.

Traditional approaches rely on agents manually clicking through CRM records, ticket histories, email threads, and order systems while talking to the customer. In practice, nobody has that much time during a live call or chat. Even with knowledge bases and scripts, context remains scattered across tools. As volumes grow and products become more complex, the “just search harder” approach falls apart — especially in omnichannel environments with phone, chat, email and self-service.

The business impact is significant. Low first-contact resolution drives repeat contacts, higher staffing needs and longer queues. Customers become frustrated when they have to repeat information or when the first answer doesn’t fit their actual setup, leading to churn and negative word-of-mouth. Internally, senior experts get overloaded with avoidable escalations, and leadership loses visibility into what is really happening across customer journeys because data is fragmented.

This challenge is real, but it is solvable. With modern AI for customer service, you can automatically compile the relevant customer context from tools like Google Workspace, CRM and ticketing systems and surface it to agents in real time. At Reruption, we’ve seen how well-designed AI assistance changes live conversations: agents feel prepared, customers feel understood, and first-contact resolution improves. Below, we’ll walk through concrete ways to use Gemini to fix missing customer context in a pragmatic, low-risk way.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building real-world AI customer service solutions, we’ve seen that Gemini is most valuable when it becomes the connective tissue between your existing tools, not another standalone app. By connecting Gemini to Google Workspace, CRM, and ticketing systems, you can automatically assemble a unified customer timeline and feed that intelligence directly into the agent workflow. The key is to approach this strategically: define what “good context” means for your use case, decide how much autonomy you give Gemini, and design guardrails so agents can trust and act on the insights.

Define What “Customer Context” Means for Your Business

Before integrating Gemini into customer service, you need a clear definition of what agents actually need to see to resolve issues on first contact. For some teams, this may be the last three tickets plus the current product and plan. For others, it includes device configurations, key emails, and recent self-service actions. If this is not explicit, your AI integration will mirror existing ambiguity and clutter agents with noise instead of insight.

Work with your service leaders and top-performing agents to list the information they wish they had at the start of every interaction. Translate this into concrete data sources (e.g., CRM objects, ticket fields, email labels, knowledge base entries). This alignment gives Gemini a clear target for what to summarize and prioritize in its customer context view, which directly supports higher first-contact resolution.

Treat Gemini as a Copilot, Not an Autonomous Agent

Strategically, the fastest path to value is to position Gemini as an agent copilot that surfaces context and recommendations — while the human agent remains in control. Full automation of customer interactions may be tempting, but it introduces higher risk, complex exception handling, and heavier compliance requirements from day one.

Start with a model where Gemini prepares the context summary, suggests next best actions and highlights potential risks, but the agent validates and decides. This reduces change resistance, simplifies governance, and gives you time to calibrate Gemini’s behavior based on feedback. Over time, you can selectively automate well-understood, low-risk workflows while keeping humans in the loop for complex or regulated cases.

Prepare Your Data Foundations and Access Model

Missing customer context is often a symptom of fragmented data and unclear access rules. A strategic Gemini rollout must consider where relevant data lives (Google Workspace, CRM, ticketing, order systems) and how it can be accessed securely. If permissions are inconsistent across tools, Gemini may either miss critical information or surface content agents shouldn’t see.

Invest in aligning data structures and access policies before or alongside your Gemini integration. Define which user roles can see which parts of the unified customer timeline, and ensure auditability. This avoids later conflicts with legal, security and works councils, and establishes trust that AI-powered customer insights are both useful and compliant.

Design for Agent Adoption, Not Just Technical Integration

From an organizational perspective, the biggest risk is deploying Gemini as a side-tool that agents ignore under time pressure. To avoid this, design the experience so that Gemini’s customer context appears exactly where agents already work — inside the ticket view, phone toolbar, or chat console. Make it faster to glance at the AI-generated summary than to search manually.

Involve frontline agents early: run co-design sessions where they react to mock-ups of the context panel, test different levels of detail, and define how suggestions should be phrased. This increases adoption and ensures that Gemini speaks the language of your customers and your brand, not generic AI-speak. Complement this with targeted enablement so agents understand what Gemini can and cannot do.

Plan for Continuous Calibration and Governance

Strategically, AI in customer service should be treated as a living capability, not a one-off project. Your products, processes, and policies change; so must Gemini’s understanding of what good support looks like. Without ongoing calibration, the quality of context summaries and suggested resolutions will drift over time.

Set up a small cross-functional governance loop including customer service, IT, and data/AI stakeholders. Review a sample of interactions regularly: Is Gemini surfacing the right history? Does it miss new product lines or policies? Are there failure modes that need new guardrails? This continuous improvement mindset turns Gemini from an experiment into a reliable part of your service operating model.

Used strategically, Gemini can turn fragmented records into actionable customer context that sits in front of agents at the exact moment they need it. The result is fewer repetitive questions, more accurate answers, and a measurable boost in first-contact resolution. At Reruption, we combine hands-on AI engineering with a deep understanding of service operations to design Gemini integrations that your agents actually use and trust. If you want to explore what this could look like in your environment, we’re happy to help you scope and test it in a focused, low-risk way.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Food Manufacturing to Manufacturing: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

PepsiCo (Frito-Lay)

Food Manufacturing

In the fast-paced food manufacturing industry, PepsiCo's Frito-Lay division grappled with unplanned machinery downtime that disrupted high-volume production lines for snacks like Lay's and Doritos. These lines operate 24/7, where even brief failures could cost thousands of dollars per hour in lost capacity—industry estimates peg average downtime at $260,000 per hour in manufacturing . Perishable ingredients and just-in-time supply chains amplified losses, leading to high maintenance costs from reactive repairs, which are 3-5x more expensive than planned ones . Frito-Lay plants faced frequent issues with critical equipment like compressors, conveyors, and fryers, where micro-stops and major breakdowns eroded overall equipment effectiveness (OEE). Worker fatigue from extended shifts compounded risks, as noted in reports of grueling 84-hour weeks, indirectly stressing machines further . Without predictive insights, maintenance teams relied on schedules or breakdowns, resulting in lost production capacity and inability to meet consumer demand spikes.

Lösung

PepsiCo deployed machine learning predictive maintenance across Frito-Lay factories, leveraging sensor data from IoT devices on equipment to forecast failures days or weeks ahead. Models analyzed vibration, temperature, pressure, and usage patterns using algorithms like random forests and deep learning for time-series forecasting . Partnering with cloud platforms like Microsoft Azure Machine Learning and AWS, PepsiCo built scalable systems integrating real-time data streams for just-in-time maintenance alerts. This shifted from reactive to proactive strategies, optimizing schedules during low-production windows and minimizing disruptions . Implementation involved pilot testing in select plants before full rollout, overcoming data silos through advanced analytics .

Ergebnisse

  • 4,000 extra production hours gained annually
  • 50% reduction in unplanned downtime
  • 30% decrease in maintenance costs
  • 95% accuracy in failure predictions
  • 20% increase in OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness)
  • $5M+ annual savings from optimized repairs
Read case study →

Unilever

Human Resources

Unilever, a consumer goods giant handling 1.8 million job applications annually, struggled with a manual recruitment process that was extremely time-consuming and inefficient . Traditional methods took up to four months to fill positions, overburdening recruiters and delaying talent acquisition across its global operations . The process also risked unconscious biases in CV screening and interviews, limiting workforce diversity and potentially overlooking qualified candidates from underrepresented groups . High volumes made it impossible to assess every applicant thoroughly, leading to high costs estimated at millions annually and inconsistent hiring quality . Unilever needed a scalable, fair system to streamline early-stage screening while maintaining psychometric rigor.

Lösung

Unilever adopted an AI-powered recruitment funnel partnering with Pymetrics for neuroscience-based gamified assessments that measure cognitive, emotional, and behavioral traits via ML algorithms trained on diverse global data . This was followed by AI-analyzed video interviews using computer vision and NLP to evaluate body language, facial expressions, tone of voice, and word choice objectively . Applications were anonymized to minimize bias, with AI shortlisting top 10-20% of candidates for human review, integrating psychometric ML models for personality profiling . The system was piloted in high-volume entry-level roles before global rollout .

Ergebnisse

  • Time-to-hire: 90% reduction (4 months to 4 weeks)
  • Recruiter time saved: 50,000 hours
  • Annual cost savings: £1 million
  • Diversity hires increase: 16% (incl. neuro-atypical candidates)
  • Candidates shortlisted for humans: 90% reduction
  • Applications processed: 1.8 million/year
Read case study →

Associated Press (AP)

News Media

In the mid-2010s, the Associated Press (AP) faced significant constraints in its business newsroom due to limited manual resources. With only a handful of journalists dedicated to earnings coverage, AP could produce just around 300 quarterly earnings reports per quarter, primarily focusing on major S&P 500 companies. This manual process was labor-intensive: reporters had to extract data from financial filings, analyze key metrics like revenue, profits, and growth rates, and craft concise narratives under tight deadlines. As the number of publicly traded companies grew, AP struggled to cover smaller firms, leaving vast amounts of market-relevant information unreported. This limitation not only reduced AP's comprehensive market coverage but also tied up journalists on rote tasks, preventing them from pursuing investigative stories or deeper analysis. The pressure of quarterly earnings seasons amplified these issues, with deadlines coinciding across thousands of companies, making scalable reporting impossible without innovation.

Lösung

To address this, AP partnered with Automated Insights in 2014, implementing their Wordsmith NLG platform. Wordsmith uses templated algorithms to transform structured financial data—such as earnings per share, revenue figures, and year-over-year changes—into readable, journalistic prose. Reporters input verified data from sources like Zacks Investment Research, and the AI generates draft stories in seconds, which humans then lightly edit for accuracy and style. The solution involved creating custom NLG templates tailored to AP's style, ensuring stories sounded human-written while adhering to journalistic standards. This hybrid approach—AI for volume, humans for oversight—overcame quality concerns. By 2015, AP announced it would automate the majority of U.S. corporate earnings stories, scaling coverage dramatically without proportional staff increases.

Ergebnisse

  • 14x increase in quarterly earnings stories: 300 to 4,200
  • Coverage expanded to 4,000+ U.S. public companies per quarter
  • Equivalent to freeing time of 20 full-time reporters
  • Stories published in seconds vs. hours manually
  • Zero reported errors in automated stories post-implementation
  • Sustained use expanded to sports, weather, and lottery reports
Read case study →

AstraZeneca

Healthcare

In the highly regulated pharmaceutical industry, AstraZeneca faced immense pressure to accelerate drug discovery and clinical trials, which traditionally take 10-15 years and cost billions, with low success rates of under 10%. Data silos, stringent compliance requirements (e.g., FDA regulations), and manual knowledge work hindered efficiency across R&D and business units. Researchers struggled with analyzing vast datasets from 3D imaging, literature reviews, and protocol drafting, leading to delays in bringing therapies to patients. Scaling AI was complicated by data privacy concerns, integration into legacy systems, and ensuring AI outputs were reliable in a high-stakes environment. Without rapid adoption, AstraZeneca risked falling behind competitors leveraging AI for faster innovation toward 2030 ambitions of novel medicines.

Lösung

AstraZeneca launched an enterprise-wide generative AI strategy, deploying ChatGPT Enterprise customized for pharma workflows. This included AI assistants for 3D molecular imaging analysis, automated clinical trial protocol drafting, and knowledge synthesis from scientific literature. They partnered with OpenAI for secure, scalable LLMs and invested in training: ~12,000 employees across R&D and functions completed GenAI programs by mid-2025. Infrastructure upgrades, like AMD Instinct MI300X GPUs, optimized model training. Governance frameworks ensured compliance, with human-in-loop validation for critical tasks. Rollout phased from pilots in 2023-2024 to full scaling in 2025, focusing on R&D acceleration via GenAI for molecule design and real-world evidence analysis.

Ergebnisse

  • ~12,000 employees trained on generative AI by mid-2025
  • 85-93% of staff reported productivity gains
  • 80% of medical writers found AI protocol drafts useful
  • Significant reduction in life sciences model training time via MI300X GPUs
  • High AI maturity ranking per IMD Index (top global)
  • GenAI enabling faster trial design and dose selection
Read case study →

Rapid Flow Technologies (Surtrac)

Transportation

Pittsburgh's East Liberty neighborhood faced severe urban traffic congestion, with fixed-time traffic signals causing long waits and inefficient flow. Traditional systems operated on preset schedules, ignoring real-time variations like peak hours or accidents, leading to 25-40% excess travel time and higher emissions. The city's irregular grid and unpredictable traffic patterns amplified issues, frustrating drivers and hindering economic activity. City officials sought a scalable solution beyond costly infrastructure overhauls. Sensors existed but lacked intelligent processing; data silos prevented coordination across intersections, resulting in wave-like backups. Emissions rose with idling vehicles, conflicting with sustainability goals.

Lösung

Rapid Flow Technologies developed Surtrac, a decentralized AI system using machine learning for real-time traffic prediction and signal optimization. Connected sensors detect vehicles, feeding data into ML models that forecast flows seconds ahead, adjusting greens dynamically. Unlike centralized systems, Surtrac's peer-to-peer coordination lets intersections 'talk,' prioritizing platoons for smoother progression. This optimization engine balances equity and efficiency, adapting every cycle. Spun from Carnegie Mellon, it integrated seamlessly with existing hardware.

Ergebnisse

  • 25% reduction in travel times
  • 40% decrease in wait/idle times
  • 21% cut in emissions
  • 16% improvement in progression
  • 50% more vehicles per hour in some corridors
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Connect Gemini to Your Core Customer Service Systems

The first tactical step is to connect Gemini to the systems where your customer context lives: Google Workspace (Gmail, Docs, Drive), your CRM, and your ticketing platform. Work with IT to set up secure API connections and service accounts that allow Gemini to read relevant data, respecting existing permissions and data protection rules.

Start with read-only access and a narrow scope: for example, only current opportunities and the last 6–12 months of tickets, plus customer-facing email threads. This is typically enough for Gemini to build useful unified customer timelines without introducing unnecessary risk. Document the data sources and fields you connect so you can later trace where each piece of the AI-generated context originates.

Configure a Standard “Customer Context” Prompt Template

To ensure consistent output quality, define a standard prompt template that Gemini uses whenever an agent opens or updates a case. This template should instruct Gemini which sources to consult and how to structure the context summary so agents can scan it quickly.

Example configuration using a system-level prompt:

You are a customer service copilot for our agents.
When given a customer identifier (email, customer ID, or ticket ID), you will:
1) Retrieve relevant information from:
   - CRM records (account, contact, products, contracts, SLAs)
   - Ticketing history (last 5 tickets, status, resolutions)
   - Recent customer emails or chats stored in Google Workspace
2) Produce a concise context summary in this structure:
   - Profile: who the customer is, segment, key products
   - Recent interactions: last 3–5 contacts with channels, topics, sentiment
   - Open issues: current tickets, orders, or escalations
   - Risk & opportunity signals: churn risk, upsell/cross-sell hints (if any)
3) Highlight anything the agent MUST check before answering.

Constraints:
- Max 200 words
- Use bullet points
- If information is missing, state clearly what is unknown instead of guessing.

Once this is in place, integrate the prompt into your agent tools via a button or automatic trigger so agents get a standardized, reliable customer context summary at the start of each interaction.

Embed Gemini Context Panels Directly into Agent Workflows

To fix missing customer context in practice, the AI-generated view needs to sit inside the tools agents already use. Work with your ticketing/CRM admins to add a Gemini-powered context panel to the main case view or phone interface. This might be implemented via a side panel, iframe, or extension depending on your stack.

Design the panel to include at least three sections: a short summary (max 5 bullet points), a timeline of recent interactions, and a list of open issues. Allow agents to expand sections for more detail but keep the default view minimal to reduce cognitive load. Track usage (e.g., panel opens per ticket) to verify adoption and iterate on the layout and content based on feedback.

Use Gemini to Suggest Next Best Actions and Knowledge Articles

Beyond showing history, configure Gemini to recommend the most likely next best actions and relevant knowledge articles based on the customer’s context and the current issue description. This directly supports higher first-contact resolution by guiding less experienced agents through complex cases.

Example prompt for next-step suggestions:

You are assisting a customer service agent.
Given the following inputs:
- Customer context summary
- Current ticket description
- Available knowledge base articles (titles & short descriptions)

Perform these steps:
1) Infer the most likely root cause or category of the issue.
2) Suggest 2–3 next best actions the agent should take, in order.
3) Recommend up to 3 relevant knowledge base articles with a short explanation
   of why each is relevant.
4) Flag if the case likely requires escalation, and to which team.

Output in structured bullet points that an agent can follow during a live call.

Integrate this into your interface as a "Suggested steps" section that refreshes when the ticket description changes. Agents gain a guided workflow that adapts to the specific customer, not just the generic issue type.

Enable Real-Time Call and Chat Support Summaries

Use Gemini to transcribe and summarize live calls or ongoing chats in real time, then feed insights back into the same context panel. This helps agents avoid asking the same questions twice and keeps them aware of what has already been promised or tried, even in longer conversations or transfers.

Configure a workflow where, every few minutes, the latest transcript snippet is sent to Gemini with an instruction to update the working summary and action list. For example:

You are tracking a live customer service interaction.
Given the existing context summary and the latest transcript segment,
update:
- What has been clarified about the customer's situation
- Steps already taken in this interaction
- Any new risks, commitments, or follow-up items

Return an updated summary of max 150 words and a bullet list of
"Already done in this interaction".

This gives agents a dynamic view of the conversation, reduces handover friction between agents, and ensures all relevant details end up in the final case notes automatically.

Measure Impact with Focused Customer Service KPIs

Finally, set up a simple but rigorous measurement framework to validate that Gemini is actually improving first-contact resolution and not just adding another widget. Define a test group of agents using Gemini context panels and a control group that continues working as before, and compare key metrics over 4–8 weeks.

Track KPIs such as first-contact resolution rate, average handle time, number of repeat contacts within 7 days, and escalation rate. Complement this with qualitative feedback from agents: Do they feel better prepared? Which parts of the context summary are most useful? Use these insights to refine prompts, UI, and data connections. Many organisations see realistic improvements like 10–20% higher FCR on targeted issue types and noticeable reductions in escalations once the workflows are tuned.

Implemented thoughtfully, these practices allow Gemini to deliver concrete outcomes: fewer repeat calls, shorter diagnostics, and agents who can confidently resolve more issues on the first contact. By starting with targeted workflows and measurable KPIs, you can scale AI support in customer service based on proven impact rather than assumptions.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini connects to your existing tools — such as Google Workspace, CRM, and ticketing systems — and uses AI to compile all relevant information into a single, concise view for the agent. Instead of clicking through emails, tickets and order histories, the agent sees a unified summary of who the customer is, what products they use, their recent interactions and any open issues.

This context can be generated automatically when a call starts or a chat opens, so the agent begins the interaction with a full picture. That’s what enables more accurate answers and higher first-contact resolution, without asking customers to repeat information they’ve already provided.

You’ll typically need three capabilities: access to your customer service systems (Google Workspace, CRM, ticketing), someone who can work with APIs or integrations, and a product/operations owner from customer service. The technical work involves configuring secure data connections and embedding Gemini outputs into your agent tools; it doesn’t require building complex AI models from scratch.

On the business side, you need service leaders and experienced agents to define what “good context” looks like and to test early versions. Reruption often forms a joint team with clients — combining your process and domain expertise with our AI engineering and prompt design — to get from idea to working prototype quickly.

If the scope is focused (e.g. one region or support queue), you can usually get to a first working prototype of Gemini-powered customer context within a few weeks. Our AI PoC approach is designed to deliver a functioning prototype plus performance metrics in a short time frame, so you can validate whether it improves agent experience and first-contact resolution.

Measurable impact on KPIs such as first-contact resolution rate and repeat contacts often becomes visible within 4–8 weeks of live use, once agents are familiar with the tool and prompts are fine-tuned based on real interactions.

Costs break down into three components: Gemini usage (API or workspace-related), integration and engineering work, and ongoing optimisation. The AI usage cost is typically modest compared to the value if you target high-volume interactions. Integration cost depends on your system landscape and how deeply you want Gemini embedded into your workflows.

ROI for AI in customer service usually comes from fewer repeat contacts, reduced escalations, and shorter handling times — all of which reduce cost per contact and free capacity. There is also a customer experience upside through faster, more accurate resolutions. A focused PoC helps you quantify these effects on a small scale before deciding on broader rollout investments.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur alongside your team: we don’t just advise, we help build and ship working solutions. Our AI PoC offering (9,900€) is specifically designed to prove whether a use case like "Gemini for unified customer context" works in your environment. We define the use case, check feasibility, build a prototype that connects to your real tools, and evaluate performance on speed, quality and cost.

Beyond the PoC, we support with hands-on AI engineering, security & compliance, and enablement so that Gemini becomes a stable part of your customer service operations. Because we embed into your organisation and operate in your P&L, we stay focused on tangible results such as higher first-contact resolution, not just slideware.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media