The Challenge: Slow Knowledge Lookup

In many customer service teams, agents lose precious minutes clicking through knowledge bases, policy documents, CRM notes and old tickets just to answer a single question. While the customer is waiting, they are juggling multiple tabs, trying different search terms and mentally stitching together the right solution. The result is slow, stressful calls and chats where agents spend more time searching than actually solving the issue.

Traditional knowledge management approaches – static FAQs, rigid decision trees, keyword-only search – were built for a simpler world. They assume that content is neatly structured and that agents know exactly which term to type to find the right article. In reality, knowledge is spread across tools, formats and departments, and every customer describes their problem differently. Even with a well-maintained knowledge base, conventional search often surfaces either too much irrelevant information or misses the one detail needed to resolve the case.

The business impact is substantial. Slow knowledge lookup inflates average handle time, reduces first-contact resolution, and increases escalations to second-level support. Customers have to contact you again because the first answer was incomplete or wrong. Agents burn out under constant time pressure and context switching. Leaders feel the effects as higher operating costs, lower NPS and a support organisation that cannot scale without continually adding headcount.

This challenge is real, but it is solvable. Modern AI for customer service can sit directly in the agent desktop, understand the context of the conversation, and surface the exact snippet from policies, manuals or past tickets that matters. At Reruption, we have helped organisations replace manual search with AI-powered assistance that actually works in production. In the rest of this page, you will find practical guidance on how to use Gemini to turn slow knowledge lookup into fast, confident first-contact resolution.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption's hands-on work building AI copilots for customer service teams, we see the same pattern again and again: the bottleneck is not the knowledge itself, but how fast agents can access and apply it in context. Gemini is a strong fit for this problem because it can connect to your CRM and knowledge bases, understand the live conversation, and deliver contextual knowledge suggestions directly in the agent workflow instead of forcing agents to search across tools.

Design Gemini Around First-Contact Resolution, Not Just Faster Search

When you introduce Gemini in customer service, it is tempting to frame it as a smarter search bar. That underestimates the potential. Strategically, you should design Gemini as a first-contact resolution assistant that understands the end-to-end interaction: what the customer is asking, what data exists about them, and what outcome defines a successful resolution.

This means aligning Gemini's role, prompts and integration points with FCR goals: surfacing the right troubleshooting flow, checking for previous similar incidents, and suggesting next-best actions. Define clear success metrics such as fewer transfers, fewer follow-up tickets and higher right-first-time answers, and make sure your implementation is judged against these outcomes, not just speed of search.

Prepare Your Knowledge and Processes Before You Blame the Model

Even the best AI knowledge assistant cannot fix poor or outdated content. Strategically, you need a realistic view of your existing knowledge landscape before rolling Gemini out to hundreds of agents. Identify which knowledge bases, policy repositories and ticket histories are authoritative, which are legacy, and where contradictions exist.

We recommend a focused content audit tied to top contact drivers: pick the 20–30 issue types that generate the majority of volume and ensure that the underlying articles and process descriptions are accurate. This does not require rewriting everything; it requires clear ownership, basic hygiene and versioning so Gemini is not amplifying bad information. With this foundation, AI-driven retrieval becomes an accelerator instead of a risk.

Embed Gemini in the Agent Desktop, Don’t Add Another Tool

From a change management perspective, the fastest way to fail with AI for slow knowledge lookup is to make agents switch to yet another screen. Strategically, your aim should be to bring Gemini into the tools agents already live in – your CRM, ticketing system or contact center platform – so that knowledge suggestions appear next to the active case, not in a separate window.

This requires early collaboration between customer service operations, IT and your AI team. Decide where in the workflow Gemini should trigger suggestions (after call reason is captured, at every new chat message, when a case is opened, etc.) and what format is most useful (short answer + supporting sources, step-by-step procedure, summarised policy). When AI feels like a natural part of the desktop instead of an extra app, adoption and impact jump significantly.

Align Risk Controls with Your Regulatory and Brand Context

Using Gemini for customer interactions introduces new risks: hallucinated answers, incorrect policy interpretations, or tone that does not fit your brand. Strategically, you need guardrails tailored to your regulatory environment and risk appetite. For some teams, AI-generated suggestions may always require human review; for others, low-risk topics might be auto-resolved.

Work with legal, compliance and information security to define which data Gemini can access, what it may generate, and where explicit approvals are required. Implement patterns like answer-with-citations only, restricted domains (e.g. no legal advice), and confidence thresholds for suggestions. This reduces the risk of surprise while still unlocking faster knowledge access and higher quality responses.

Invest in Agent Enablement and Feedback Loops from Day One

Deploying Gemini is not just a technical project; it is a capability shift for your service organisation. Strategically, you need a plan for agent enablement: training sessions that explain what Gemini can and cannot do, how to interpret suggestions, and how to provide structured feedback when something is off.

Create simple feedback mechanisms inside the agent interface (e.g. "useful / not useful" on each suggestion, with quick reasons) and connect this data back into your prompt engineering and content improvement cycles. Identify "AI champions" inside the team who can share best practices, spot emerging issues and help refine configuration. This turns frontline experience into continuous improvement, not sporadic complaints.

Using Gemini to fix slow knowledge lookup is ultimately a strategic move: you are turning fragmented documentation and ticket history into a live assistant that guides every interaction toward first-contact resolution. With the right guardrails, integrations and enablement, Gemini shifts your service operation from "search and hope" to "guided, confident resolution".

At Reruption, we specialise in turning these ideas into working systems embedded in your existing tools – from scoping and PoC to production roll-out and iteration. If you want to explore how Gemini could sit inside your agent desktop and unlock faster, more accurate answers, we are ready to work with your team to design and implement a solution that fits your reality.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Transportation to Healthcare: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Waymo (Alphabet)

Transportation

Developing fully autonomous ride-hailing demanded overcoming extreme challenges in AI reliability for real-world roads. Waymo needed to master perception—detecting objects in fog, rain, night, or occlusions using sensors alone—while predicting erratic human behaviors like jaywalking or sudden lane changes. Planning complex trajectories in dense, unpredictable urban traffic, and precise control to execute maneuvers without collisions, required near-perfect accuracy, as a single failure could be catastrophic . Scaling from tests to commercial fleets introduced hurdles like handling edge cases (e.g., school buses with stop signs, emergency vehicles), regulatory approvals across cities, and public trust amid scrutiny. Incidents like failing to stop for school buses highlighted software gaps, prompting recalls. Massive data needs for training, compute-intensive models, and geographic adaptation (e.g., right-hand vs. left-hand driving) compounded issues, with competitors struggling on scalability .

Lösung

Waymo's Waymo Driver stack integrates deep learning end-to-end: perception fuses lidar, radar, and cameras via convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and transformers for 3D object detection, tracking, and semantic mapping with high fidelity. Prediction models forecast multi-agent behaviors using graph neural networks and video transformers trained on billions of simulated and real miles . For planning, Waymo applied scaling laws—larger models with more data/compute yield power-law gains in forecasting accuracy and trajectory quality—shifting from rule-based to ML-driven motion planning for human-like decisions. Control employs reinforcement learning and model-predictive control hybridized with neural policies for smooth, safe execution. Vast datasets from 96M+ autonomous miles, plus simulations, enable continuous improvement; recent AI strategy emphasizes modular, scalable stacks .

Ergebnisse

  • 450,000+ weekly paid robotaxi rides (Dec 2025)
  • 96 million autonomous miles driven (through June 2025)
  • 3.5x better avoiding injury-causing crashes vs. humans
  • 2x better avoiding police-reported crashes vs. humans
  • Over 71M miles with detailed safety crash analysis
  • 250,000 weekly rides (April 2025 baseline, since doubled)
Read case study →

DBS Bank

Banking

DBS Bank, Southeast Asia's leading financial institution, grappled with scaling AI from experiments to production amid surging fraud threats, demands for hyper-personalized customer experiences, and operational inefficiencies in service support. Traditional fraud detection systems struggled to process up to 15,000 data points per customer in real-time, leading to missed threats and suboptimal risk scoring. Personalization efforts were hampered by siloed data and lack of scalable algorithms for millions of users across diverse markets. Additionally, customer service teams faced overwhelming query volumes, with manual processes slowing response times and increasing costs. Regulatory pressures in banking demanded responsible AI governance, while talent shortages and integration challenges hindered enterprise-wide adoption. DBS needed a robust framework to overcome data quality issues, model drift, and ethical concerns in generative AI deployment, ensuring trust and compliance in a competitive Southeast Asian landscape.

Lösung

DBS launched an enterprise-wide AI program with over 20 use cases, leveraging machine learning for advanced fraud risk models and personalization, complemented by generative AI for an internal support assistant. Fraud models integrated vast datasets for real-time anomaly detection, while personalization algorithms delivered hyper-targeted nudges and investment ideas via the digibank app. A human-AI synergy approach empowered service teams with a GenAI assistant handling routine queries, drawing from internal knowledge bases. DBS emphasized responsible AI through governance frameworks, upskilling 40,000+ employees, and phased rollout starting with pilots in 2021, scaling production by 2024. Partnerships with tech leaders and Harvard-backed strategy ensured ethical scaling across fraud, personalization, and operations.

Ergebnisse

  • 17% increase in savings from prevented fraud attempts
  • Over 100 customized algorithms for customer analyses
  • 250,000 monthly queries processed efficiently by GenAI assistant
  • 20+ enterprise-wide AI use cases deployed
  • Analyzes up to 15,000 data points per customer for fraud
  • Boosted productivity by 20% via AI adoption (CEO statement)
Read case study →

Rolls-Royce Holdings

Aerospace

Jet engines are highly complex, operating under extreme conditions with millions of components subject to wear. Airlines faced unexpected failures leading to costly groundings, with unplanned maintenance causing millions in daily losses per aircraft. Traditional scheduled maintenance was inefficient, often resulting in over-maintenance or missed issues, exacerbating downtime and fuel inefficiency. Rolls-Royce needed to predict failures proactively amid vast data from thousands of engines in flight. Challenges included integrating real-time IoT sensor data (hundreds per engine), handling terabytes of telemetry, and ensuring accuracy in predictions to avoid false alarms that could disrupt operations. The aerospace industry's stringent safety regulations added pressure to deliver reliable AI without compromising performance.

Lösung

Rolls-Royce developed the IntelligentEngine platform, combining digital twins—virtual replicas of physical engines—with machine learning models. Sensors stream live data to cloud-based systems, where ML algorithms analyze patterns to predict wear, anomalies, and optimal maintenance windows. Digital twins enable simulation of engine behavior pre- and post-flight, optimizing designs and schedules. Partnerships with Microsoft Azure IoT and Siemens enhanced data processing and VR modeling, scaling AI across Trent series engines like Trent 7000 and 1000. Ethical AI frameworks ensure data security and bias-free predictions.

Ergebnisse

  • 48% increase in time on wing before first removal
  • Doubled Trent 7000 engine time on wing
  • Reduced unplanned downtime by up to 30%
  • Improved fuel efficiency by 1-2% via optimized ops
  • Cut maintenance costs by 20-25% for operators
  • Processed terabytes of real-time data from 1000s of engines
Read case study →

Rapid Flow Technologies (Surtrac)

Transportation

Pittsburgh's East Liberty neighborhood faced severe urban traffic congestion, with fixed-time traffic signals causing long waits and inefficient flow. Traditional systems operated on preset schedules, ignoring real-time variations like peak hours or accidents, leading to 25-40% excess travel time and higher emissions. The city's irregular grid and unpredictable traffic patterns amplified issues, frustrating drivers and hindering economic activity. City officials sought a scalable solution beyond costly infrastructure overhauls. Sensors existed but lacked intelligent processing; data silos prevented coordination across intersections, resulting in wave-like backups. Emissions rose with idling vehicles, conflicting with sustainability goals.

Lösung

Rapid Flow Technologies developed Surtrac, a decentralized AI system using machine learning for real-time traffic prediction and signal optimization. Connected sensors detect vehicles, feeding data into ML models that forecast flows seconds ahead, adjusting greens dynamically. Unlike centralized systems, Surtrac's peer-to-peer coordination lets intersections 'talk,' prioritizing platoons for smoother progression. This optimization engine balances equity and efficiency, adapting every cycle. Spun from Carnegie Mellon, it integrated seamlessly with existing hardware.

Ergebnisse

  • 25% reduction in travel times
  • 40% decrease in wait/idle times
  • 21% cut in emissions
  • 16% improvement in progression
  • 50% more vehicles per hour in some corridors
Read case study →

Morgan Stanley

Banking

Financial advisors at Morgan Stanley struggled with rapid access to the firm's extensive proprietary research database, comprising over 350,000 documents spanning decades of institutional knowledge. Manual searches through this vast repository were time-intensive, often taking 30 minutes or more per query, hindering advisors' ability to deliver timely, personalized advice during client interactions . This bottleneck limited scalability in wealth management, where high-net-worth clients demand immediate, data-driven insights amid volatile markets. Additionally, the sheer volume of unstructured data—40 million words of research reports—made it challenging to synthesize relevant information quickly, risking suboptimal recommendations and reduced client satisfaction. Advisors needed a solution to democratize access to this 'goldmine' of intelligence without extensive training or technical expertise .

Lösung

Morgan Stanley partnered with OpenAI to develop AI @ Morgan Stanley Debrief, a GPT-4-powered generative AI chatbot tailored for wealth management advisors. The tool uses retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) to securely query the firm's proprietary research database, providing instant, context-aware responses grounded in verified sources . Implemented as a conversational assistant, Debrief allows advisors to ask natural-language questions like 'What are the risks of investing in AI stocks?' and receive synthesized answers with citations, eliminating manual digging. Rigorous AI evaluations and human oversight ensure accuracy, with custom fine-tuning to align with Morgan Stanley's institutional knowledge . This approach overcame data silos and enabled seamless integration into advisors' workflows.

Ergebnisse

  • 98% adoption rate among wealth management advisors
  • Access for nearly 50% of Morgan Stanley's total employees
  • Queries answered in seconds vs. 30+ minutes manually
  • Over 350,000 proprietary research documents indexed
  • 60% employee access at peers like JPMorgan for comparison
  • Significant productivity gains reported by CAO
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Connect Gemini to Your CRM and Knowledge Bases for Contextual Answers

The foundation of solving slow knowledge lookup is giving Gemini access to the right sources and context. Practically, this means integrating Gemini with your CRM or ticketing system (for customer history, products, previous tickets) and with your knowledge repositories (wikis, manuals, policy docs, FAQ databases).

Configure your integration so that, for each active case, Gemini receives:
- The current conversation transcript or call notes
- Key CRM fields (customer type, product, contract, region)
- Relevant metadata (priority, channel, language)

Then instruct Gemini to use only approved sources when formulating suggestions. A typical system prompt for your agent assistant might look like this:

You are an internal customer service assistant for our support agents.
You have access to:
- Knowledge base articles (KB)
- Product manuals
- Policy documents
- Past resolved tickets

Rules:
- Answer ONLY based on these sources.
- When unsure, say you are not certain and suggest which KB tags to search.
- Always provide a short answer for the agent AND the list of sources you used.
- Highlight any policy constraints or risk-related information.

Format your response as:
- "Agent reply draft": short, clear, customer-friendly answer.
- "Steps": numbered troubleshooting or resolution steps.
- "Sources": KB IDs or URLs used.

This setup ensures that suggestions are both relevant and traceable, which is critical for quality control and compliance.

Trigger Real-Time Suggestions During Live Chats and Calls

To truly reduce handle time, Gemini should proactively push knowledge while the interaction is happening, not only when an agent explicitly searches. Technically, you can configure your contact center or chat platform to send new customer messages (or real-time transcription snippets from calls) to Gemini and display suggestions in a side panel.

For example, for live chat you might send the last 10–15 messages plus CRM context to Gemini with an instruction like:

Given the conversation and context below, identify the customer's main issue
and propose the top 3 most relevant knowledge articles or past tickets.

Return:
- A one-sentence summary of the issue
- 3 suggested articles or tickets with titles, IDs and why they're relevant
- A recommended next-best action for the agent

Agents see evolving suggestions as the customer clarifies their problem, allowing them to jump directly into the most relevant article without manual searching. Over time, analyse which suggestions are consistently used to refine your triggers and ranking logic.

Use Gemini to Summarise Long Policies and Manuals into Agent Playbooks

Many knowledge lookup delays come from dense, multi-page documents that are not written for live support situations. A tactical win is to use Gemini offline to transform long content into short, actionable agent playbooks that can then be surfaced in real time.

For each high-volume topic, you can run a batch process or manual workflow where Gemini ingests a policy or manual section and produces a standardised playbook. For example:

Read the attached policy/manual section.
Create an internal agent playbook with:
- When this policy/manual section applies (scenarios)
- Do / Don't rules
- Step-by-step resolution flows
- Exceptions and edge cases
- Phrases to avoid with customers

Use concise language. Target reading time: < 2 minutes.

Review and approve these playbooks with your process owners, then store them in a dedicated collection that Gemini can prioritise for live suggestions. Agents will receive distilled, operational guidance instead of having to interpret legal or technical language on the fly.

Auto-Draft Customer Replies While Showing the Underlying Logic

Once Gemini can find the right knowledge, the next step is to help agents respond faster and more consistently. Configure Gemini to generate reply drafts that are grounded in the selected knowledge article and tailored to the customer's situation, while still making it easy for the agent to review and adjust.

A practical prompt pattern for reply drafting is:

You are drafting a reply for a customer based on:
- The conversation so far
- The selected knowledge base article (quoted below)
- The customer's profile from CRM

Tasks:
1) Write a clear, polite reply in [LANGUAGE] that:
   - Addresses the customer's specific situation
   - Explains steps in simple terms
   - Reflects our brand tone (friendly, professional, concise)
2) Include a short internal note for the agent summarising
   why these steps are recommended.

Do NOT invent policies or guarantees that are not in the article.

Integrate this into a "Generate reply" button in your ticketing system. Track edit rates (how often agents significantly change the draft) as a quality KPI and use examples of heavily edited replies to refine prompts and knowledge content.

Turn Resolved Tickets into Searchable AI-Ready Knowledge

Your past tickets contain a wealth of practical problem-solution pairs that rarely make it into the formal knowledge base. Use Gemini to automatically extract structured knowledge from resolved tickets and make it retrievable for future cases, which directly supports first-contact resolution.

After a ticket is closed, you can run a background job where Gemini reads the full interaction and resolution notes, then generates a concise, tagged summary:

Summarise this resolved ticket for internal reuse.
Return JSON with:
- "issue_summary": 1-2 sentences
- "root_cause": 1-2 sentences
- "resolution_steps": numbered list
- "products": list of product names/IDs
- "tags": 5-10 tags (issue type, feature, error codes, etc.)

Use only information present in the ticket.

Store this output in a searchable index that Gemini can use as an additional source. Over time, this grows an organically curated, highly practical knowledge layer that reflects real customer language and edge cases – exactly what traditional documentation often misses.

Measure Impact with Operational KPIs and Agent Feedback

To ensure your Gemini deployment in customer service delivers real value, establish clear metrics and monitoring from the start. At minimum, track:

  • Average handle time (AHT) before and after Gemini for targeted queues
  • First-contact resolution (FCR) rate for issues where Gemini suggestions are used
  • Suggestion utilisation rate (how often agents accept or use suggestions)
  • Agent satisfaction with AI assistance (simple recurring pulse surveys)

Combine quantitative data with qualitative comments from agents to understand where Gemini shines and where it introduces friction. Use this feedback to refine prompts, adjust which sources are indexed, or change when suggestions appear in the workflow.

With these practices in place, organisations typically see 10–25% reductions in handle time on targeted contact types, noticeable improvements in first-contact resolution, and a better experience for agents who can focus on the customer instead of the search bar.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini speeds up knowledge lookup by working directly inside the agent workflow instead of acting as a separate search tool. It receives the live conversation, key CRM fields and case metadata, and then retrieves the most relevant snippets from your knowledge base, manuals, and past tickets.

Instead of agents guessing keywords and scanning long articles, Gemini surfaces a short answer, step-by-step guidance and links to the underlying sources in real time. This reduces tab-switching and reading time, helps agents avoid duplicate or outdated content, and makes it much easier to resolve issues on the first contact.

To use Gemini for knowledge assistance effectively, you need three main ingredients:

  • Accessible data sources: your CRM or ticketing system and at least one central knowledge repository (wiki, KB, document store) with API or export access.
  • Basic content hygiene: for your top contact drivers, knowledge articles should be reasonably up-to-date and not contradict each other.
  • Technical integration path: either internal IT resources or a partner like Reruption to connect Gemini to your systems and implement the UX in the agent desktop.

You do not need a fully perfect knowledge base to start. It is often better to begin with a well-defined subset of topics and improve content iteratively based on what Gemini surfaces.

Timelines depend on your system landscape, but most organisations can see first results within a few weeks if they focus on a narrow scope. A typical path looks like this:

  • Week 1–2: Use-case scoping, source system analysis, and initial Gemini configuration.
  • Week 3–4: Build and integrate a pilot assistant for a specific queue or issue type, enable a small group of agents, and start collecting feedback.
  • Week 5–8: Refine prompts and content, extend coverage to more topics, and start measuring impact on AHT and FCR.

Meaningful improvements in handle time and first-contact resolution on targeted contact types are often visible within the first 1–2 months of a focused rollout.

The cost of running Gemini for customer service includes usage-based API or platform fees and the initial integration and configuration effort. Operating costs are typically tied to the number of interactions processed and the complexity/length of the content Gemini reads.

On the benefit side, you can quantify ROI through reduced handle time, increased first-contact resolution (fewer repeat contacts), lower escalation rates, and improved agent productivity. Even modest improvements – for example a 10% reduction in AHT on high-volume queues – can translate into significant cost savings or avoided headcount growth.

We recommend modelling ROI for a specific subset of interactions first (e.g. top 5 contact drivers) and validating it via a pilot before expanding. This keeps the investment controlled while giving you real data on impact.

Reruption supports organisations end-to-end in turning Gemini into a practical knowledge copilot for their customer service teams. With our AI PoC offering (9.900€), we validate a concrete use case such as "reduce handle time for top 5 issue types" in the form of a working prototype connected to your real data.

We apply our Co-Preneur approach: embedding with your team, challenging existing workflows, and building the integrations, prompts and UX directly in your agent tools instead of stopping at slideware. After the PoC, we provide a production plan and can continue with full implementation, including security & compliance alignment, agent enablement and performance monitoring.

If you want a partner who combines strategic clarity with deep engineering and moves from idea to working solution quickly, Reruption can take ownership of making Gemini work for your specific customer service environment.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media