The Challenge: Slow Knowledge Lookup

In many customer service teams, agents spend more time hunting for information than actually helping customers. Answers are scattered across wikis, PDFs, legacy knowledge bases, email archives, and old tickets. While a customer is waiting on the phone or in chat, agents click through multiple systems, skim long documents, and try to interpret policies on the fly. The result: long silences, guesswork, and higher stress for everyone involved.

Traditional approaches to knowledge management are not keeping up with this reality. Adding more articles to a static knowledge base, restructuring folders, or running occasional training sessions doesn’t change the core dynamic: humans still have to manually search, interpret, and connect information under time pressure. Classic search is keyword-based, not meaning-based. It can’t read a 40-page policy and surface the three sentences that matter for this specific case while the customer is still on the line.

The business impact of slow knowledge lookup is significant. Handle times increase, queues grow, and first-contact resolution drops, leading directly to higher operational costs and lower customer satisfaction scores. Escalations rise because frontline agents don’t feel confident in their answers, which in turn overloads second-level teams. Over time, these inefficiencies become a competitive disadvantage: your service feels slower and less competent than companies that empower agents with instant, context-aware answers.

This challenge is real, especially in environments with complex products, policies, or regulatory requirements. But it is also very solvable. With tools like Claude, large volumes of policies, manuals, and historical tickets can be turned into real-time guidance during calls and chats. At Reruption, we’ve seen how AI-powered knowledge access can transform day-to-day work for support teams, and in the rest of this guide we’ll walk through concrete ways you can use Claude to fix slow knowledge lookup and improve first-contact resolution.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s work building AI-powered document research, chatbots and internal tools, we’ve learned that the real value of Claude in customer service is its ability to read long, messy knowledge sources and turn them into fast, trustworthy answers for agents. Instead of forcing people to adapt to rigid knowledge bases, Claude lets you bring your existing policies, manuals, and ticket history into a single AI layer that responds in real time during conversations. When implemented thoughtfully, this doesn’t just speed up knowledge lookup – it fundamentally raises your first-contact resolution ceiling.

Define "Resolvable at First Contact" for Your Business

Before you implement Claude, get precise about what first-contact resolution means in your context. Some issues can and should be resolved by frontline agents with the right information; others will always require specialist involvement, approvals, or site visits. Map your top contact reasons and classify which ones are realistically solvable at first contact if the agent has perfect knowledge support.

This clarity shapes how you use Claude for customer service. For high-potential categories (e.g. billing questions, policy clarification, standard troubleshooting), invest in deep knowledge coverage and tailored guidance prompts. For inherently complex cases, focus Claude on better triage and data collection instead of full resolution. That way, your AI investment is tightly aligned with business outcomes rather than generic "AI in support" experimentation.

Treat Knowledge as a Product, Not a Static Repository

Many companies try to drop Claude on top of an outdated knowledge base and expect magical results. In practice, you need to treat support knowledge as a living product. That means design ownership, feedback loops, and regular iteration. Identify a small cross-functional team (operations, senior agents, and an AI product owner) who are responsible for the quality and structure of the content Claude will read.

From a strategic perspective, this team decides which document sources Claude should trust, how to handle conflicting policies, and which tone and escalation rules the assistant should follow. Reruption’s experience is that this proactive curation dramatically improves the reliability of AI-powered knowledge lookup and reduces the risk of agents receiving outdated or non-compliant advice.

Embed Claude into Existing Workflows, Not Next to Them

The biggest adoption risk is turning Claude into yet another tool agents have to open on a second screen. Strategically, you want AI-assisted knowledge retrieval to live directly inside your contact center workflows: the CRM view, the ticketing system, or the chat console your team already uses. If agents must constantly switch context, they’ll default back to old habits and your ROI will stall.

Plan your implementation with integration in mind. Decide early where in the agent journey Claude should appear: pre-call case prep, in-call guidance, after-call summaries, or all of the above. Use your existing tech stack’s APIs or middleware so that Claude can see customer data, recent tickets, and relevant documentation without manual copy-paste. This mindset converts Claude from a "nice-to-have tool" into a core part of how your customer service team operates.

Balance Speed with Compliance and Risk Management

Claude’s strength is its ability to read long policies and answer fast – but that same strength requires a clear approach to compliance and risk. You need strategic guardrails: which content is in scope, what must always be quoted verbatim (e.g. legal terms), and when Claude should explicitly tell an agent to escalate or seek approval.

Define these rules in collaboration with legal, compliance, and operations. Then encode them in Claude’s system prompts and retrieval configuration. For regulated scenarios, you may require the AI to show source citations for any critical claim so agents can quickly double-check. This structured approach lets you benefit from rapid knowledge lookup without introducing hidden compliance risks.

Prepare Your Team for Assisted, Not Automated, Resolution

Finally, the human side: Claude should be positioned as an agent co-pilot, not a replacement. Strategically, this shapes how agents relate to the tool. If they fear automation, they will resist it; if they see it as a way to reduce stressful searching and increase confidence with customers, they will actively improve it with feedback.

Invest time in explaining what Claude can and cannot do, where human judgment remains critical, and how feedback will be used to refine prompts and sources. In our experience, when teams are involved in designing the AI assistant and can see their suggestions implemented, adoption and impact on first-contact resolution both increase significantly.

Used thoughtfully, Claude can turn slow, manual searching into real-time, contextual guidance that lifts first-contact resolution and agent confidence. The key is not just plugging in an AI model, but aligning knowledge, workflows, and guardrails around how your support team actually works. Reruption brings the combination of AI engineering depth and on-the-ground implementation experience to make that happen quickly and safely; if you want to explore what this could look like in your own contact center, we’re ready to co-design and build a solution with you.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Biotech to Banking: Learn how companies successfully use Claude.

Insilico Medicine

Biotech

The drug discovery process traditionally spans 10-15 years and costs upwards of $2-3 billion per approved drug, with over 90% failure rate in clinical trials due to poor efficacy, toxicity, or ADMET issues. In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a fatal lung disease with limited treatments like pirfenidone and nintedanib, the need for novel therapies is urgent, but identifying viable targets and designing effective small molecules remains arduous, relying on slow high-throughput screening of existing libraries. Key challenges include target identification amid vast biological data, de novo molecule generation beyond screened compounds, and predictive modeling of properties to reduce wet-lab failures. Insilico faced skepticism on AI's ability to deliver clinically viable candidates, regulatory hurdles for AI-discovered drugs, and integration of AI with experimental validation.

Lösung

Insilico deployed its end-to-end Pharma.AI platform, integrating generative AI and deep learning for accelerated discovery. PandaOmics used multimodal deep learning on omics data to nominate novel targets like TNIK kinase for IPF, prioritizing based on disease relevance and druggability. Chemistry42 employed generative models (GANs, reinforcement learning) to design de novo molecules, generating and optimizing millions of novel structures with desired properties, while InClinico predicted preclinical outcomes. This AI-driven pipeline overcame traditional limitations by virtual screening vast chemical spaces and iterating designs rapidly. Validation through hybrid AI-wet lab approaches ensured robust candidates like ISM001-055 (Rentosertib).

Ergebnisse

  • Time from project start to Phase I: 30 months (vs. 5+ years traditional)
  • Time to IND filing: 21 months
  • First generative AI drug to enter Phase II human trials (2023)
  • Generated/optimized millions of novel molecules de novo
  • Preclinical success: Potent TNIK inhibition, efficacy in IPF models
  • USAN naming for Rentosertib: March 2025, Phase II ongoing
Read case study →

Kaiser Permanente

Healthcare

In hospital settings, adult patients on general wards often experience clinical deterioration without adequate warning, leading to emergency transfers to intensive care, increased mortality, and preventable readmissions. Kaiser Permanente Northern California faced this issue across its network, where subtle changes in vital signs and lab results went unnoticed amid high patient volumes and busy clinician workflows. This resulted in elevated adverse outcomes, including higher-than-necessary death rates and 30-day readmissions . Traditional early warning scores like MEWS (Modified Early Warning Score) were limited by manual scoring and poor predictive accuracy for deterioration within 12 hours, failing to leverage the full potential of electronic health record (EHR) data. The challenge was compounded by alert fatigue from less precise systems and the need for a scalable solution across 21 hospitals serving millions .

Lösung

Kaiser Permanente developed the Advance Alert Monitor (AAM), an AI-powered early warning system using predictive analytics to analyze real-time EHR data—including vital signs, labs, and demographics—to identify patients at high risk of deterioration within the next 12 hours. The model generates a risk score and automated alerts integrated into clinicians' workflows, prompting timely interventions like physician reviews or rapid response teams . Implemented since 2013 in Northern California, AAM employs machine learning algorithms trained on historical data to outperform traditional scores, with explainable predictions to build clinician trust. It was rolled out hospital-wide, addressing integration challenges through Epic EHR compatibility and clinician training to minimize fatigue .

Ergebnisse

  • 16% lower mortality rate in AAM intervention cohort
  • 500+ deaths prevented annually across network
  • 10% reduction in 30-day readmissions
  • Identifies deterioration risk within 12 hours with high reliability
  • Deployed in 21 Northern California hospitals
Read case study →

Tesla, Inc.

Automotive

The automotive industry faces a staggering 94% of traffic accidents attributed to human error, including distraction, fatigue, and poor judgment, resulting in over 1.3 million global road deaths annually. In the US alone, NHTSA data shows an average of one crash per 670,000 miles driven, highlighting the urgent need for advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) to enhance safety and reduce fatalities. Tesla encountered specific hurdles in scaling vision-only autonomy, ditching radar and lidar for camera-based systems reliant on AI to mimic human perception. Challenges included variable AI performance in diverse conditions like fog, night, or construction zones, regulatory scrutiny over misleading Level 2 labeling despite Level 4-like demos, and ensuring robust driver monitoring to prevent over-reliance. Past incidents and studies criticized inconsistent computer vision reliability.

Lösung

Tesla's Autopilot and Full Self-Driving (FSD) Supervised leverage end-to-end deep learning neural networks trained on billions of real-world miles, processing camera feeds for perception, prediction, and control without modular rules. Transitioning from HydraNet (multi-task learning for 30+ outputs) to pure end-to-end models, FSD v14 achieves door-to-door driving via video-based imitation learning. Overcoming challenges, Tesla scaled data collection from its fleet of 6M+ vehicles, using Dojo supercomputers for training on petabytes of video. Vision-only approach cuts costs vs. lidar rivals, with recent upgrades like new cameras addressing edge cases. Regulatory pushes target unsupervised FSD by end-2025, with China approval eyed for 2026.

Ergebnisse

  • Autopilot Crash Rate: 1 per 6.36M miles (Q3 2025)
  • Safety Multiple: 9x safer than US average (670K miles/crash)
  • Fleet Data: Billions of miles for training
  • FSD v14: Door-to-door autonomy achieved
  • Q2 2025: 1 crash per 6.69M miles
  • 2024 Q4 Record: 5.94M miles between accidents
Read case study →

Airbus

Aerospace

In aircraft design, computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations are essential for predicting airflow around wings, fuselages, and novel configurations critical to fuel efficiency and emissions reduction. However, traditional high-fidelity RANS solvers require hours to days per run on supercomputers, limiting engineers to just a few dozen iterations per design cycle and stifling innovation for next-gen hydrogen-powered aircraft like ZEROe. This computational bottleneck was particularly acute amid Airbus' push for decarbonized aviation by 2035, where complex geometries demand exhaustive exploration to optimize lift-drag ratios while minimizing weight. Collaborations with DLR and ONERA highlighted the need for faster tools, as manual tuning couldn't scale to test thousands of variants needed for laminar flow or blended-wing-body concepts.

Lösung

Machine learning surrogate models, including physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), were trained on vast CFD datasets to emulate full simulations in milliseconds. Airbus integrated these into a generative design pipeline, where AI predicts pressure fields, velocities, and forces, enforcing Navier-Stokes physics via hybrid loss functions for accuracy. Development involved curating millions of simulation snapshots from legacy runs, GPU-accelerated training, and iterative fine-tuning with experimental wind-tunnel data. This enabled rapid iteration: AI screens designs, high-fidelity CFD verifies top candidates, slashing overall compute by orders of magnitude while maintaining <5% error on key metrics.

Ergebnisse

  • Simulation time: 1 hour → 30 ms (120,000x speedup)
  • Design iterations: +10,000 per cycle in same timeframe
  • Prediction accuracy: 95%+ for lift/drag coefficients
  • 50% reduction in design phase timeline
  • 30-40% fewer high-fidelity CFD runs required
  • Fuel burn optimization: up to 5% improvement in predictions
Read case study →

JPMorgan Chase

Banking

In the high-stakes world of asset management and wealth management at JPMorgan Chase, advisors faced significant time burdens from manual research, document summarization, and report drafting. Generating investment ideas, market insights, and personalized client reports often took hours or days, limiting time for client interactions and strategic advising. This inefficiency was exacerbated post-ChatGPT, as the bank recognized the need for secure, internal AI to handle vast proprietary data without risking compliance or security breaches. The Private Bank advisors specifically struggled with preparing for client meetings, sifting through research reports, and creating tailored recommendations amid regulatory scrutiny and data silos, hindering productivity and client responsiveness in a competitive landscape.

Lösung

JPMorgan addressed these challenges by developing the LLM Suite, an internal suite of seven fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) powered by generative AI, integrated with secure data infrastructure. This platform enables advisors to draft reports, generate investment ideas, and summarize documents rapidly using proprietary data. A specialized tool, Connect Coach, was created for Private Bank advisors to assist in client preparation, idea generation, and research synthesis. The implementation emphasized governance, risk management, and employee training through AI competitions and 'learn-by-doing' approaches, ensuring safe scaling across the firm. LLM Suite rolled out progressively, starting with proofs-of-concept and expanding firm-wide.

Ergebnisse

  • Users reached: 140,000 employees
  • Use cases developed: 450+ proofs-of-concept
  • Financial upside: Up to $2 billion in AI value
  • Deployment speed: From pilot to 60K users in months
  • Advisor tools: Connect Coach for Private Bank
  • Firm-wide PoCs: Rigorous ROI measurement across 450 initiatives
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Build a Unified Knowledge Layer for Claude

Start by consolidating the content Claude should use to answer customer service questions. This usually includes FAQs, policy documents, product manuals, internal playbooks, and anonymised ticket histories. Store these in a structured, machine-readable way (e.g. a document store or vector database) rather than scattering them across SharePoint sites, PDFs, and wikis.

Work with IT to set up a retrieval system that lets Claude pull only from approved sources. Tag documents by product, region, language, and validity period so the AI can prioritise the most relevant, up-to-date content. This is the backbone of reliable AI knowledge retrieval and directly influences the quality of first-contact answers.

Design an Agent-Facing Claude Assistant Inside Your Ticketing or CRM System

Integrate Claude where agents already work. For example, in your CRM or helpdesk, add a side panel called “AI Knowledge Assistant” that automatically receives key context from the current case: customer type, product, channel, and conversation transcript.

For live chat or phone support, your system can send the live transcript (or notes) to Claude every few seconds. Claude then returns the most relevant instructions, policy excerpts, or troubleshooting steps without agents having to type full prompts. Behind the scenes, you still use a well-crafted base prompt to structure Claude’s behaviour.

Example system prompt for the agent assistant:
You are an internal customer service assistant for <Company>.

Goals:
- Help agents resolve issues on the first contact
- Always base answers on the provided company knowledge and past tickets
- Quote relevant policy or manual sections with clear references
- If information is missing or unclear, say so and suggest next steps

Format answers as:
- Short summary
- Step-by-step guidance for the agent
- Policy excerpts with document names and sections

This setup lets agents click once to ask, for example, “Summarise applicable policy and recommended resolution” and receive a structured response in seconds.

Create Task-Specific Prompts for Common Support Scenarios

Beyond the general assistant, define targeted prompts for your top contact reasons (billing corrections, warranty questions, cancelations, basic troubleshooting). These can be buttons or quick actions that send a predefined instruction to Claude along with the current case data.

Example prompt: Warranty & Returns Clarification
You are assisting a customer service agent on a live call.

Context:
- Customer question: <paste latest message/transcript>
- Product: <product name>
- Region: <country/market>

Using only the company warranty and returns policies provided, do the following:
1) State whether the customer is eligible for a return, repair, or refund
2) List any conditions or exceptions that apply
3) Provide a clear script the agent can use to explain the decision
4) Highlight any edge cases where the agent should escalate

By standardising these task-specific prompts, you reduce cognitive load for agents and ensure consistent, policy-compliant responses for frequent contact types.

Use Claude to Summarise Long Histories Before and During Contacts

When customers with complex histories call in, agents often waste valuable minutes piecing together previous tickets, emails, and notes. Use Claude to generate concise, actionable summaries before the agent picks up, or in the first seconds of the interaction.

Example prompt: Case Prep Summary
You are preparing a customer service agent for an incoming call.

Input:
- Past tickets (last 12 months)
- Email exchanges
- Internal notes

Produce:
- 3-sentence summary of the customer's history
- List of 3 likely topics or pain points to expect
- Any open actions or promises made previously
- Suggested opening sentence for the agent

These summaries dramatically speed up context-building, reduce repeated questions, and help agents move faster towards resolution on the first contact.

Introduce Source Citations and Confidence Signals for Agents

To build trust, configure Claude to always show where the information came from. Include document titles, sections, and, where possible, deep links back into your knowledge system. Teach agents to quickly skim these citations so they can verify critical details in edge cases.

Example answer format instruction:
When giving guidance, always include:
- "Source documents" with names and section headings
- A short rationale explaining why this policy applies
- A confidence estimate (High/Medium/Low)

If confidence is below High, recommend that the agent:
- Confirms with a supervisor, or
- Escalates according to the escalation matrix

This practice turns Claude into a transparent co-pilot rather than a black box, making it easier to adopt in environments with strict compliance and quality assurance requirements.

Measure Impact with Clear CX and Efficiency KPIs

Finally, treat your Claude rollout like any other operational change: define and track metrics. Common indicators include average handle time (AHT), first-contact resolution rate, time-to-first-answer in chat, number of internal escalations, and QA scores on knowledge accuracy.

Set a short baseline period (4–8 weeks) before broad rollout. Then compare pilot teams using Claude with control groups. A realistic ambition for a well-designed implementation is 10–25% faster handle times on covered contact types, a measurable lift in first-contact resolution for those types, and a noticeable reduction in internal knowledge-related escalations. Use these insights to refine prompts, add missing documents, and prioritise further integrations.

Expected outcome: with a structured approach to knowledge consolidation, workflow integration, and measurement, most organisations can achieve tangible improvements in support efficiency and customer satisfaction within 8–12 weeks of starting their Claude-powered knowledge assistant initiative.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Claude can read and reason over large volumes of your internal content – policies, manuals, FAQs, and past tickets – and return direct, context-aware answers instead of search results. Instead of agents running multiple keyword searches and opening dozens of tabs, they can ask Claude in natural language while they’re on a call or chat, and receive a concise summary plus step-by-step guidance.

When integrated into your CRM or helpdesk, Claude can also see the current case details and conversation, so it surfaces only the most relevant snippets and troubleshooting flows. This reduces time spent searching, lowers error rates from misinterpreted policies, and increases the share of issues resolved on the first contact.

A focused initial implementation does not require a full-scale transformation. Typically, you need:

  • Access to your key knowledge sources (FAQs, policies, manuals, selected ticket history)
  • Technical access to your CRM/helpdesk or an internal tool where the assistant will live
  • A small cross-functional team: one product/operations owner, one technical owner, and 2–3 experienced agents as testers

With this setup, a realistic timeline is 4–6 weeks to go from idea to a working pilot for a few high-volume contact types. From there, you can iterate on prompts, expand document coverage, and roll out to more teams. Reruption’s AI PoC approach is designed around this kind of fast, contained pilot.

Exact numbers depend on your starting point and complexity, but there are some realistic ranges if Claude is well integrated. For clearly defined contact types with good documentation, companies often see:

  • 10–25% reduction in average handle time on covered issues, mainly from faster lookup and less back-and-forth
  • Higher first-contact resolution for information-heavy queries (billing, policy, standard troubleshooting), because agents have clearer guidance
  • Fewer internal escalations where the only reason was “I couldn’t find the right information”

These improvements typically emerge within a few weeks of agents using the assistant daily. The key is to scope your pilot narrowly, measure impact by contact reason, and continuously refine prompts and knowledge sources based on real usage data.

Costs break down into three main components: usage of the Claude model itself, integration and engineering effort, and some ongoing time to maintain and improve your knowledge layer. The model usage cost is usually modest compared to agent salaries, because each interaction only consumes a small fraction of a cent to a few cents, even for long contexts.

On the ROI side, the biggest levers are reductions in handle time, increased first-contact resolution, and lower training effort for new agents. When you quantify those (e.g. minutes saved per interaction, escalations avoided, ramp-up time reduced), it’s common for an effective implementation to pay back its initial investment within months. Having a contained PoC with clearly defined metrics is the best way to validate this ROI in your environment before a broader rollout.

Reruption combines AI engineering depth with hands-on operational experience to move beyond slideware and into working solutions. Our AI PoC offering is designed exactly for questions like yours: can we use Claude to fix slow knowledge lookup in our customer service, with our data and our systems?

In a fixed-scope engagement, we help you define the use case, select and connect the right knowledge sources, design prompts and guardrails, and build a working prototype integrated into your existing tools. With our Co-Preneur approach, we don’t just advise – we embed alongside your team, iterate on real agent feedback, and leave you with a clear roadmap from PoC to production. If you want to see Claude in action on your own support cases rather than in generic demos, this is the fastest way to get there.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media