The Challenge: Limited 24/7 Support Coverage

Customer expectations are now global and always-on, but most support organisations are still built around office hours. Outside business hours, customers hit closed phone lines, slow email responses or generic forms that promise callbacks “as soon as possible”. For customers with urgent issues, this feels like a broken promise, and for teams, it means waking up to a backlog of frustrated tickets every morning.

Traditional fixes no longer work. Hiring night and weekend teams is expensive and hard to justify if the overnight volume is volatile or seasonal. Outsourcing to low-cost call centres often leads to inconsistent quality, brand misalignment and complex vendor management. Static FAQ pages and basic rule-based chatbots can answer only the simplest questions and break down as soon as a request deviates from a handful of predefined paths.

The impact of not solving limited 24/7 support coverage is direct and measurable. Tickets pile up overnight, leading to morning spikes where agents are forced into firefighting instead of high-value work. Response-time SLAs are breached, NPS and CSAT scores drop, and customers quietly churn to competitors that “are just easier to deal with”. For companies with international customers, limited coverage is effectively a market access problem: you are present on paper, but not when customers actually need you.

The good news: this challenge is now solvable without building a full follow-the-sun operation. Modern AI assistants like Claude can handle a large portion of repetitive, out-of-hours requests with high-quality, policy-compliant answers and smart escalation. At Reruption, we’ve helped organisations design and implement such AI-first support flows, and in the rest of this page you’ll find concrete guidance on how to use Claude to close your 24/7 support gap in a controlled, business-ready way.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s hands-on work building AI assistants for customer service, we see a recurring pattern: most companies already have the knowledge needed for 24/7 support locked in policies, help centre articles and ticket histories, but not in a form that scales outside office hours. Claude is particularly strong at turning this long, messy context into safe, detailed answers and summaries, making it a powerful engine for always-on customer support automation if you implement it with the right boundaries and governance.

Design for Human + AI, Not AI Instead of Humans

Using Claude for 24/7 support automation works best when you treat it as a first-line assistant, not a replacement for your support team. Strategically, this means defining clear swimlanes: which topics should be handled fully by Claude, which should be triaged and summarised for agents, and which must be routed directly to humans (e.g. legal disputes, critical outages, VIP accounts).

In practice, this division protects your brand and reduces internal resistance. Agents stop seeing AI as a threat and start seeing it as the “night shift” that cleans up repetitive work and provides high-quality context for complex cases. From a governance perspective, it also simplifies risk management because you can point to explicit categories where AI automation in customer service is and is not allowed.

Start with High-Volume, Low-Risk Request Types

A successful strategy for automating customer support with Claude is to focus your first implementation on a narrow set of repetitive, low-risk topics: order status, password resets, simple usage questions, appointment changes, basic troubleshooting. These are typically well-documented, have clear policies and predictable workflows, and represent a large share of overnight demand.

By starting here, you build trust with stakeholders and customers while gathering hard data on deflection rates, response times and escalation quality. This gives you political capital to expand coverage into more complex scenarios later. It also reduces compliance and security concerns because your first wave of automation stays away from sensitive decisions and edge cases.

Make Knowledge a First-Class Asset

Claude’s long-context reasoning only pays off if your knowledge base is structured, current and accessible. Strategically, you need to treat support knowledge management as a core capability: clear ownership, a review cadence, and explicit policies for what the AI is allowed to reference. Without that, even the best model will replicate outdated processes and contradictions that already exist in your documentation.

For many organisations, the work is less about AI and more about consolidating scattered PDFs, wikis and tribal knowledge into a stable source of truth. Once that exists, Claude can safely consume full policy documents and ticket histories to give nuanced answers out-of-hours, instead of the generic responses typical chatbots provide.

Align Stakeholders on Risk, Guardrails and Escalation

To deploy Claude in customer service at scale, you need early alignment between customer service leadership, legal/compliance, IT and data protection. The key is to move the discussion away from abstract fears (“AI might say something wrong”) towards concrete risk scenarios, guardrails and escalation rules.

For example: which data is allowed to be passed to Claude, which phrases must be avoided, what constitutes a mandatory handover to human agents, and how will all interactions be logged for audit? When we work with clients, we co-design these rails so that Claude can answer confidently within allowed boundaries, and gracefully step aside when thresholds are exceeded. This reduces implementation friction and prevents late-stage vetoes from risk owners.

Prepare Your Team for AI-First Workflows

Strategically, an AI-powered 24/7 support setup changes how daytime teams work. Instead of starting their shift with inbox chaos, they come in to a queue of AI-answered tickets, AI-generated summaries and pre-drafted replies. For this to work, you must invest in team enablement: training agents to review and correct Claude’s answers, use AI summaries efficiently and provide feedback loops to improve the system.

This isn’t just a tooling rollout; it’s a workflow shift. Clearly communicate that AI is there to eliminate drudgery (re-explaining the same answers at 7am) so agents can spend time on complex, empathetic work. Teams that understand this framing adopt AI faster and are more willing to refine prompts, edge cases and knowledge gaps over time.

Used with clear guardrails and a strong knowledge base, Claude can close much of your 24/7 support gap by handling repetitive questions overnight and preparing complex cases for your human team. Reruption brings both the AI engineering depth and the operational understanding of customer service needed to turn this into a robust, real-world setup rather than a fragile prototype. If you’re exploring how Claude could fit into your support operations, we’re happy to discuss your specific constraints and sketch a concrete, testable path forward.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Banking to Manufacturing: Learn how companies successfully use Claude.

HSBC

Banking

As a global banking titan handling trillions in annual transactions, HSBC grappled with escalating fraud and money laundering risks. Traditional systems struggled to process over 1 billion transactions monthly, generating excessive false positives that burdened compliance teams, slowed operations, and increased costs. Ensuring real-time detection while minimizing disruptions to legitimate customers was critical, alongside strict regulatory compliance in diverse markets. Customer service faced high volumes of inquiries requiring 24/7 multilingual support, straining resources. Simultaneously, HSBC sought to pioneer generative AI research for innovation in personalization and automation, but challenges included ethical deployment, human oversight for advancing AI, data privacy, and integration across legacy systems without compromising security. Scaling these solutions globally demanded robust governance to maintain trust and adhere to evolving regulations.

Lösung

HSBC tackled fraud with machine learning models powered by Google Cloud's Transaction Monitoring 360, enabling AI to detect anomalies and financial crime patterns in real-time across vast datasets. This shifted from rigid rules to dynamic, adaptive learning. For customer service, NLP-driven chatbots were rolled out to handle routine queries, provide instant responses, and escalate complex issues, enhancing accessibility worldwide. In parallel, HSBC advanced generative AI through internal research, sandboxes, and a landmark multi-year partnership with Mistral AI (announced December 2024), integrating tools for document analysis, translation, fraud enhancement, automation, and client-facing innovations—all under ethical frameworks with human oversight.

Ergebnisse

  • Screens over 1 billion transactions monthly for financial crime
  • Significant reduction in false positives and manual reviews (up to 60-90% in models)
  • Hundreds of AI use cases deployed across global operations
  • Multi-year Mistral AI partnership (Dec 2024) to accelerate genAI productivity
  • Enhanced real-time fraud alerts, reducing compliance workload
Read case study →

JPMorgan Chase

Banking

In the high-stakes world of asset management and wealth management at JPMorgan Chase, advisors faced significant time burdens from manual research, document summarization, and report drafting. Generating investment ideas, market insights, and personalized client reports often took hours or days, limiting time for client interactions and strategic advising. This inefficiency was exacerbated post-ChatGPT, as the bank recognized the need for secure, internal AI to handle vast proprietary data without risking compliance or security breaches. The Private Bank advisors specifically struggled with preparing for client meetings, sifting through research reports, and creating tailored recommendations amid regulatory scrutiny and data silos, hindering productivity and client responsiveness in a competitive landscape.

Lösung

JPMorgan addressed these challenges by developing the LLM Suite, an internal suite of seven fine-tuned large language models (LLMs) powered by generative AI, integrated with secure data infrastructure. This platform enables advisors to draft reports, generate investment ideas, and summarize documents rapidly using proprietary data. A specialized tool, Connect Coach, was created for Private Bank advisors to assist in client preparation, idea generation, and research synthesis. The implementation emphasized governance, risk management, and employee training through AI competitions and 'learn-by-doing' approaches, ensuring safe scaling across the firm. LLM Suite rolled out progressively, starting with proofs-of-concept and expanding firm-wide.

Ergebnisse

  • Users reached: 140,000 employees
  • Use cases developed: 450+ proofs-of-concept
  • Financial upside: Up to $2 billion in AI value
  • Deployment speed: From pilot to 60K users in months
  • Advisor tools: Connect Coach for Private Bank
  • Firm-wide PoCs: Rigorous ROI measurement across 450 initiatives
Read case study →

UC San Diego Health

Healthcare

Sepsis, a life-threatening condition, poses a major threat in emergency departments, with delayed detection contributing to high mortality rates—up to 20-30% in severe cases. At UC San Diego Health, an academic medical center handling over 1 million patient visits annually, nonspecific early symptoms made timely intervention challenging, exacerbating outcomes in busy ERs . A randomized study highlighted the need for proactive tools beyond traditional scoring systems like qSOFA. Hospital capacity management and patient flow were further strained post-COVID, with bed shortages leading to prolonged admission wait times and transfer delays. Balancing elective surgeries, emergencies, and discharges required real-time visibility . Safely integrating generative AI, such as GPT-4 in Epic, risked data privacy breaches and inaccurate clinical advice . These issues demanded scalable AI solutions to predict risks, streamline operations, and responsibly adopt emerging tech without compromising care quality.

Lösung

UC San Diego Health implemented COMPOSER, a deep learning model trained on electronic health records to predict sepsis risk up to 6-12 hours early, triggering Epic Best Practice Advisory (BPA) alerts for nurses . This quasi-experimental approach across two ERs integrated seamlessly with workflows . Mission Control, an AI-powered operations command center funded by $22M, uses predictive analytics for real-time bed assignments, patient transfers, and capacity forecasting, reducing bottlenecks . Led by Chief Health AI Officer Karandeep Singh, it leverages data from Epic for holistic visibility. For generative AI, pilots with Epic's GPT-4 enable NLP queries and automated patient replies, governed by strict safety protocols to mitigate hallucinations and ensure HIPAA compliance . This multi-faceted strategy addressed detection, flow, and innovation challenges.

Ergebnisse

  • Sepsis in-hospital mortality: 17% reduction
  • Lives saved annually: 50 across two ERs
  • Sepsis bundle compliance: Significant improvement
  • 72-hour SOFA score change: Reduced deterioration
  • ICU encounters: Decreased post-implementation
  • Patient throughput: Improved via Mission Control
Read case study →

UPS

Logistics

UPS faced massive inefficiencies in delivery routing, with drivers navigating an astronomical number of possible route combinations—far exceeding the nanoseconds since Earth's existence. Traditional manual planning led to longer drive times, higher fuel consumption, and elevated operational costs, exacerbated by dynamic factors like traffic, package volumes, terrain, and customer availability. These issues not only inflated expenses but also contributed to significant CO2 emissions in an industry under pressure to go green. Key challenges included driver resistance to new technology, integration with legacy systems, and ensuring real-time adaptability without disrupting daily operations. Pilot tests revealed adoption hurdles, as drivers accustomed to familiar routes questioned the AI's suggestions, highlighting the human element in tech deployment. Scaling across 55,000 vehicles demanded robust infrastructure and data handling for billions of data points daily.

Lösung

UPS developed ORION (On-Road Integrated Optimization and Navigation), an AI-powered system blending operations research for mathematical optimization with machine learning for predictive analytics on traffic, weather, and delivery patterns. It dynamically recalculates routes in real-time, considering package destinations, vehicle capacity, right/left turn efficiencies, and stop sequences to minimize miles and time. The solution evolved from static planning to dynamic routing upgrades, incorporating agentic AI for autonomous decision-making. Training involved massive datasets from GPS telematics, with continuous ML improvements refining algorithms. Overcoming adoption challenges required driver training programs and gamification incentives, ensuring seamless integration via in-cab displays.

Ergebnisse

  • 100 million miles saved annually
  • $300-400 million cost savings per year
  • 10 million gallons of fuel reduced yearly
  • 100,000 metric tons CO2 emissions cut
  • 2-4 miles shorter routes per driver daily
  • 97% fleet deployment by 2021
Read case study →

BP

Energy

BP, a global energy leader in oil, gas, and renewables, grappled with high energy costs during peak periods across its extensive assets. Volatile grid demands and price spikes during high-consumption times strained operations, exacerbating inefficiencies in energy production and consumption. Integrating intermittent renewable sources added forecasting challenges, while traditional management failed to dynamically respond to real-time market signals, leading to substantial financial losses and grid instability risks . Compounding this, BP's diverse portfolio—from offshore platforms to data-heavy exploration—faced data silos and legacy systems ill-equipped for predictive analytics. Peak energy expenses not only eroded margins but hindered the transition to sustainable operations amid rising regulatory pressures for emissions reduction. The company needed a solution to shift loads intelligently and monetize flexibility in energy markets .

Lösung

To tackle these issues, BP acquired Open Energi in 2021, gaining access to its flagship Plato AI platform, which employs machine learning for predictive analytics and real-time optimization. Plato analyzes vast datasets from assets, weather, and grid signals to forecast peaks and automate demand response, shifting non-critical loads to off-peak times while participating in frequency response services . Integrated into BP's operations, the AI enables dynamic containment and flexibility markets, optimizing consumption without disrupting production. Combined with BP's internal AI for exploration and simulation, it provides end-to-end visibility, reducing reliance on fossil fuels during peaks and enhancing renewable integration . This acquisition marked a strategic pivot, blending Open Energi's demand-side expertise with BP's supply-side scale.

Ergebnisse

  • $10 million in annual energy savings
  • 80+ MW of energy assets under flexible management
  • Strongest oil exploration performance in years via AI
  • Material boost in electricity demand optimization
  • Reduced peak grid costs through dynamic response
  • Enhanced asset efficiency across oil, gas, renewables
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Implement a Tiered Conversation Flow with Smart Escalation

For tactical success with Claude-based support chatbots, define a conversation flow that mirrors your existing support tiers. Tier 0 covers information-only questions that Claude can fully resolve. Tier 1 includes guided workflows (e.g. resetting a password, updating details) where Claude walks the user through steps. Higher tiers trigger data collection, summarisation and escalation to humans, not direct resolution.

Use system prompts to encode this behaviour explicitly. For example, in your backend you might send something like:

System prompt for Claude:
You are an always-on customer support assistant.
- You may fully answer only if the request matches our Tier 0 or Tier 1 topics.
- For Tier 2+ topics, ask 3-5 clarifying questions, then summarize and ESCALATE.
- Never make up policies or guarantees. If unsure, say you will pass this to a human.

Tier 0 topics: order status, shipping times, password reset help, invoice download.
Tier 1 topics: basic troubleshooting, appointment changes, product usage questions.
Escalation format:
"[ESCALATE]
Summary: ...
Customer priority: low/medium/high
Key details: ..."

This ensures overnight interactions are either safely resolved or handed over with a ready-made summary for agents starting their shift.

Connect Claude to Your Knowledge Base via Retrieval

To keep answers accurate, integrate Claude with a retrieval layer that queries your help centre, policy docs and FAQ articles instead of baking content into static prompts. Technically, this usually means an embedding-based search over your documents, feeding the top results into Claude as context for every question.

On each turn, your backend should: (1) capture the user message, (2) run semantic search on your knowledge base, (3) pass the most relevant snippets plus the original question into Claude. Your prompt might look like:

System:
You answer using ONLY the provided context documents.
If the answer is not clearly in the documents, say you will escalate.

Context documents:
[DOC 1]
[DOC 2]
...

User question:
{{user_message}}

This pattern is critical for safe, policy-compliant AI answers, especially in regulated industries or where pricing, terms and conditions matter.

Use Claude to Pre-Triage and Summarise Overnight Tickets

Even if you don’t want fully autonomous replies at first, you can immediately reduce morning peaks by using Claude to enrich and triage overnight tickets. When new emails or form submissions arrive out-of-hours, run them through Claude to produce a structured summary, sentiment, suggested category and initial reply draft.

An example prompt for this back-office usage:

System:
You are a support triage assistant. Analyze the ticket and output JSON only.

User message:
{{ticket_body}}

Output JSON with fields:
- summary: short summary of the issue
- sentiment: "angry" | "frustrated" | "neutral" | "positive"
- urgency: "low" | "medium" | "high"
- suggested_queue: one of ["billing", "tech", "account", "other"]
- draft_reply: polite first response following our tone of voice

Your ticketing system can then route and prioritise based on this metadata, allowing agents to clear the backlog faster every morning.

Define Strict Data Handling and Redaction Rules

When processing real customer data, you must implement explicit data protection measures around your AI customer support automation. Tactically, this means adding a pre-processing layer that redacts or masks sensitive information (credit card numbers, full IDs, health data) before content is sent to Claude, and defining clear rules on what is never allowed to leave your infrastructure.

In code, this is often a middleware step that detects patterns and replaces them with placeholders:

Example redaction pipeline (conceptual):
raw_text = get_incoming_message()
redacted_text = redact_pii(raw_text, patterns=[
  credit_cards, bank_accounts, national_ids
])
response = call_claude(redacted_text)
store_mapping(placeholder_tokens, original_values)

Separate from this, configure logging and retention for your AI integration in line with your legal and IT policies, and document this for internal and external stakeholders.

Continuously Fine-Tune Prompts and Flows Using Real Transcripts

An AI support assistant is not a “set and forget” asset. Once your Claude integration is live, regularly review overnight transcripts, identify where users get stuck or escalate unnecessarily, and adjust prompts, knowledge base content and routing rules.

Create a simple “improvement loop”: weekly, sample 20–50 conversations, mark which could have been solved by better instructions or missing articles, and update both the system prompt and the referenced documents. A prompt refinement might evolve from:

Old:
"Help customers with order questions."

New:
"When helping with order questions, ALWAYS ask for:
- order number
- email address
- shipping country
Before answering, restate what you understood and confirm the details."

Over time, this tuning can significantly increase first-contact resolution and reduce escalations.

Measure the Right KPIs for 24/7 AI Support

Define clear metrics before you scale your Claude-powered support assistant. Useful KPIs include: percentage of out-of-hours conversations fully resolved by AI, reduction in average first response time overnight, decrease in morning backlog size, agent time saved per day, and impact on CSAT/NPS for overnight contacts.

Instrument your chatbot and ticketing systems to log when Claude answers autonomously vs. when a human takes over, and track customer satisfaction separately for AI-handled and human-handled interactions. This data lets you make grounded decisions about expanding automation scope or adjusting guardrails.

When implemented with these tactical patterns, organisations typically see 20–50% of out-of-hours requests handled fully by AI within the first months, 30–60% reductions in morning backlogs, and meaningful improvements in perceived responsiveness — without adding full night or weekend shifts.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes, for the right types of requests. Claude is well-suited for always-on support where answers can be based on your existing documentation, policies and standard procedures. It can reliably handle common topics such as order status, account help, basic troubleshooting and policy explanations, even when they span long documents.

The key is to design clear boundaries: Claude fully answers only low-risk, well-documented questions, and escalates anything ambiguous or sensitive to human agents. With retrieval from your knowledge base and good guardrails, most companies see high-quality, brand-consistent answers overnight while keeping humans in control for edge cases.

At a minimum, you need: (1) a structured knowledge base (help centre, policies, FAQs), (2) a chat or ticketing interface (website widget, in-app chat, email gateway), and (3) an integration layer that connects your systems to Claude via API. You don’t need a full-scale IT transformation to start — a focused pilot can be built on top of existing tools.

In terms of skills, you’ll need product/ops owners from customer service, someone who understands your current processes, and engineering support to wire up the API, retrieval and logging. Reruption typically works with your internal IT and support leadership to stand up a first working version within weeks, then iterate based on live usage.

For a well-scoped pilot focused on a few high-volume request types, you can usually see measurable impact within 4–8 weeks from project start. In the first phase, most clients aim for assisted workflows: Claude drafts answers and triages tickets, but humans send the final response, which already reduces manual effort and stabilises morning peaks.

Once quality and guardrails are validated, you can switch selected flows to full automation for out-of-hours traffic. At that point, it’s realistic to see 20–40% of overnight contacts handled end-to-end by AI within the first few months, depending on your case mix and documentation quality.

The cost side has three components: initial setup (design, integration, knowledge preparation), ongoing maintenance (prompt updates, knowledge base curation) and per-usage API costs. Compared to hiring or outsourcing full night and weekend teams, the operating cost of a Claude-based virtual agent is typically a fraction, especially at scale.

On the ROI side, we look at reduced headcount or overtime needs for out-of-hours coverage, fewer SLA breaches, lower churn from frustrated customers, and freed-up agent capacity for complex cases. For many organisations, the business case is positive even if AI handles only 20–30% of overnight volume, because that segment is otherwise disproportionately expensive to staff.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur inside your organisation: instead of just advising, we help you design, build and ship a functioning Claude-based support assistant in your real environment. Our AI PoC offering (9,900€) is a focused way to test whether your 24/7 support use case is technically and operationally feasible before you commit to a full rollout.

In that PoC, we define the scope (which overnight topics to automate), select the right architecture (including retrieval and guardrails), prototype the integration with your existing tools, and measure performance on real or realistic data. From there, we can support you through hardening, security and compliance reviews, and scaling the solution — always with the mindset of building an AI-first support capability, not just a one-off chatbot.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media