The Challenge: Untargeted Product Recommendations

Most marketing teams still rely on static bestseller blocks, broad category suggestions or manually defined cross-sell rules. On the surface, these modules look like personalization, but in reality every shopper sees nearly the same products regardless of their tastes, intent or current context. The result is a generic experience that fails to reflect what customers actually want in the moment.

This approach worked when data was sparse and channels were simple, but it breaks down in modern e-commerce and digital marketing. Users move fluidly between website, app, email, search and social. Their behavior leaves rich signals about preferences, price sensitivity and intent – yet traditional recommendation engines and rule-based setups rarely use more than a handful of attributes. Updating rules is slow, manual and quickly becomes unmanageable for hundreds of categories and thousands of SKUs.

The business impact is significant. Irrelevant product recommendations train customers to ignore your on-site and in-channel suggestions, depressing click-through and conversion rates. Average order value stays flat because true cross-sell and upsell opportunities are missed. Marketing teams pour budget into acquisition, only to lose potential revenue on the last mile of the journey. Meanwhile, competitors investing in smarter personalization quietly gain higher revenue per visitor and stronger customer loyalty.

The good news: this is a solvable problem. With modern generative AI like Gemini, marketers can finally connect behavioral data, product catalogs and campaign content into one continuous personalization loop. At Reruption, we’ve seen how AI-first thinking can replace fragile rules with adaptive, data-driven recommendations that ship in weeks, not years. In the sections below, you’ll find a practical roadmap to move from untargeted product blocks to intelligent, Gemini-powered personalization.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s perspective, using Gemini for product recommendation personalization is not about adding another widget to your site – it is about rethinking how your marketing stack decides what to show, to whom, and when. Drawing on our hands-on experience building AI products and internal tools inside complex organisations, we see Gemini as the reasoning layer that can sit between your analytics, product feed and campaign systems, orchestrating next-best-product decisions and the content that wraps around them.

Frame Recommendations as a Business System, Not a Widget

Many teams treat product recommendations as a front-end feature: a carousel on the homepage, a block in the basket, a placeholder in an email. To use Gemini for personalized recommendations effectively, you need to frame it as a core business system that touches merchandising, CRM, performance marketing and product management. That means aligning on shared objectives like incremental revenue per session, margin-aware upsell, or reduction in abandonment — not just “widget CTR”.

At a strategic level, clarify the decision logic you want Gemini to support: Should it prioritize margin or conversion probability? How should it trade off recency vs. diversity of recommendations? Which channels need to be consistent, and where is experimentation acceptable? This shared view turns Gemini into a controlled driver of commercial outcomes rather than an opaque black box owned by one team.

Design a Data Strategy Before You Design Prompts

Gemini is powerful at reasoning over complex data — but only if you feed it the right signals. Before thinking about prompt templates or campaign copy, marketing leaders should steer a clear data strategy for AI-driven recommendations. Which behavioral signals matter most for your business (e.g. high-intent views, search queries, wishlist activity, content consumption)? How will that data reliably reach Gemini via APIs or batch processes?

This is where close collaboration between marketing, data and engineering is essential. Define a minimal but robust event schema, decide what product attributes (price bands, margin buckets, compatibility tags, lifestyle themes) need to be exposed, and ensure consent and privacy considerations are addressed up front. With this foundation, you can ask Gemini better questions and trust the outputs.

Start Narrow: One High-Value Journey, Not Full-Site Personalization

It is tempting to promise “AI personalization everywhere” and then stall under the complexity. A more effective strategy is to deploy Gemini in one clearly defined, high-impact journey first. For many brands, that might be cart and post-purchase cross-sell recommendations, or a key lifecycle email such as first-time buyer nurture. This creates a contained environment for experimentation, data-learning and organisational change.

By focusing on one journey, you can define clean success metrics (e.g. uplift in AOV, attach rate of accessories, or click-through on recommendation blocks), gather qualitative feedback from customers and internal stakeholders, and iterate on the Gemini workflow quickly. Once this path is working reliably, you can extend the same patterns to home, category, search and CRM campaigns with far less risk.

Prepare Your Team to Trust – But Verify – AI Decisions

Moving from rule-based logic to AI-generated product recommendations changes how marketers and merchandisers work. The goal is not blind trust in Gemini, but calibrated trust with strong observability. Strategically, this means defining guardrails: hard exclusions (e.g. out-of-stock, restricted products), brand and compliance rules, and constraints around discounts or sensitive categories.

It also means agreeing on processes for reviewing, approving and overriding AI behavior. For example, product and CRM leads might review recommendation patterns weekly with clear dashboards, and define human-in-the-loop workflows for strategic campaigns or seasonal catalog shifts. Treat Gemini as a smart colleague: powerful, but operating under shared standards and KPIs.

Mitigate Risk with Transparent Metrics and Controlled Experiments

Any shift from generic to AI-personalized recommendations should be managed as a portfolio of experiments, not a big-bang replacement. Strategically, set up an experimentation framework with holdout groups and A/B tests to quantify uplift from Gemini-powered recommendations versus your current baseline. Track not only conversion and revenue uplift, but also user experience metrics like bounce rate and time on site.

To mitigate risk, start with conservative traffic allocations and explicit rollback criteria. Make metrics transparent across marketing, product and leadership so everyone can see how Gemini-based personalization impacts the P&L. This transparency builds confidence internally and keeps the conversation grounded in measurable business impact instead of hype.

Used deliberately, Gemini can turn your product recommendations from static noise into a dynamic system that responds to each customer in real time and in every campaign. The key is treating it as a business capability – with the right data, guardrails and experiment design – rather than a plug-and-play widget. At Reruption, we build exactly these kinds of AI-first systems inside organisations, from early proof-of-concept to production workflows. If you want to explore how Gemini could power next-best-product decisions in your stack, we’re ready to co-design and test a solution with you.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From Biotech to Telecommunications: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Insilico Medicine

Biotech

The drug discovery process traditionally spans 10-15 years and costs upwards of $2-3 billion per approved drug, with over 90% failure rate in clinical trials due to poor efficacy, toxicity, or ADMET issues. In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a fatal lung disease with limited treatments like pirfenidone and nintedanib, the need for novel therapies is urgent, but identifying viable targets and designing effective small molecules remains arduous, relying on slow high-throughput screening of existing libraries. Key challenges include target identification amid vast biological data, de novo molecule generation beyond screened compounds, and predictive modeling of properties to reduce wet-lab failures. Insilico faced skepticism on AI's ability to deliver clinically viable candidates, regulatory hurdles for AI-discovered drugs, and integration of AI with experimental validation.

Lösung

Insilico deployed its end-to-end Pharma.AI platform, integrating generative AI and deep learning for accelerated discovery. PandaOmics used multimodal deep learning on omics data to nominate novel targets like TNIK kinase for IPF, prioritizing based on disease relevance and druggability. Chemistry42 employed generative models (GANs, reinforcement learning) to design de novo molecules, generating and optimizing millions of novel structures with desired properties, while InClinico predicted preclinical outcomes. This AI-driven pipeline overcame traditional limitations by virtual screening vast chemical spaces and iterating designs rapidly. Validation through hybrid AI-wet lab approaches ensured robust candidates like ISM001-055 (Rentosertib).

Ergebnisse

  • Time from project start to Phase I: 30 months (vs. 5+ years traditional)
  • Time to IND filing: 21 months
  • First generative AI drug to enter Phase II human trials (2023)
  • Generated/optimized millions of novel molecules de novo
  • Preclinical success: Potent TNIK inhibition, efficacy in IPF models
  • USAN naming for Rentosertib: March 2025, Phase II ongoing
Read case study →

UC San Diego Health

Healthcare

Sepsis, a life-threatening condition, poses a major threat in emergency departments, with delayed detection contributing to high mortality rates—up to 20-30% in severe cases. At UC San Diego Health, an academic medical center handling over 1 million patient visits annually, nonspecific early symptoms made timely intervention challenging, exacerbating outcomes in busy ERs . A randomized study highlighted the need for proactive tools beyond traditional scoring systems like qSOFA. Hospital capacity management and patient flow were further strained post-COVID, with bed shortages leading to prolonged admission wait times and transfer delays. Balancing elective surgeries, emergencies, and discharges required real-time visibility . Safely integrating generative AI, such as GPT-4 in Epic, risked data privacy breaches and inaccurate clinical advice . These issues demanded scalable AI solutions to predict risks, streamline operations, and responsibly adopt emerging tech without compromising care quality.

Lösung

UC San Diego Health implemented COMPOSER, a deep learning model trained on electronic health records to predict sepsis risk up to 6-12 hours early, triggering Epic Best Practice Advisory (BPA) alerts for nurses . This quasi-experimental approach across two ERs integrated seamlessly with workflows . Mission Control, an AI-powered operations command center funded by $22M, uses predictive analytics for real-time bed assignments, patient transfers, and capacity forecasting, reducing bottlenecks . Led by Chief Health AI Officer Karandeep Singh, it leverages data from Epic for holistic visibility. For generative AI, pilots with Epic's GPT-4 enable NLP queries and automated patient replies, governed by strict safety protocols to mitigate hallucinations and ensure HIPAA compliance . This multi-faceted strategy addressed detection, flow, and innovation challenges.

Ergebnisse

  • Sepsis in-hospital mortality: 17% reduction
  • Lives saved annually: 50 across two ERs
  • Sepsis bundle compliance: Significant improvement
  • 72-hour SOFA score change: Reduced deterioration
  • ICU encounters: Decreased post-implementation
  • Patient throughput: Improved via Mission Control
Read case study →

H&M

Apparel Retail

In the fast-paced world of apparel retail, H&M faced intense pressure from rapidly shifting consumer trends and volatile demand. Traditional forecasting methods struggled to keep up, leading to frequent stockouts during peak seasons and massive overstock of unsold items, which contributed to high waste levels and tied up capital. Reports indicate H&M's inventory inefficiencies cost millions annually, with overproduction exacerbating environmental concerns in an industry notorious for excess. Compounding this, global supply chain disruptions and competition from agile rivals like Zara amplified the need for precise trend forecasting. H&M's legacy systems relied on historical sales data alone, missing real-time signals from social media and search trends, resulting in misallocated inventory across 5,000+ stores worldwide and suboptimal sell-through rates.

Lösung

H&M deployed AI-driven predictive analytics to transform its approach, integrating machine learning models that analyze vast datasets from social media, fashion blogs, search engines, and internal sales. These models predict emerging trends weeks in advance and optimize inventory allocation dynamically. The solution involved partnering with data platforms to scrape and process unstructured data, feeding it into custom ML algorithms for demand forecasting. This enabled automated restocking decisions, reducing human bias and accelerating response times from months to days.

Ergebnisse

  • 30% increase in profits from optimized inventory
  • 25% reduction in waste and overstock
  • 20% improvement in forecasting accuracy
  • 15-20% higher sell-through rates
  • 14% reduction in stockouts
Read case study →

UPS

Logistics

UPS faced massive inefficiencies in delivery routing, with drivers navigating an astronomical number of possible route combinations—far exceeding the nanoseconds since Earth's existence. Traditional manual planning led to longer drive times, higher fuel consumption, and elevated operational costs, exacerbated by dynamic factors like traffic, package volumes, terrain, and customer availability. These issues not only inflated expenses but also contributed to significant CO2 emissions in an industry under pressure to go green. Key challenges included driver resistance to new technology, integration with legacy systems, and ensuring real-time adaptability without disrupting daily operations. Pilot tests revealed adoption hurdles, as drivers accustomed to familiar routes questioned the AI's suggestions, highlighting the human element in tech deployment. Scaling across 55,000 vehicles demanded robust infrastructure and data handling for billions of data points daily.

Lösung

UPS developed ORION (On-Road Integrated Optimization and Navigation), an AI-powered system blending operations research for mathematical optimization with machine learning for predictive analytics on traffic, weather, and delivery patterns. It dynamically recalculates routes in real-time, considering package destinations, vehicle capacity, right/left turn efficiencies, and stop sequences to minimize miles and time. The solution evolved from static planning to dynamic routing upgrades, incorporating agentic AI for autonomous decision-making. Training involved massive datasets from GPS telematics, with continuous ML improvements refining algorithms. Overcoming adoption challenges required driver training programs and gamification incentives, ensuring seamless integration via in-cab displays.

Ergebnisse

  • 100 million miles saved annually
  • $300-400 million cost savings per year
  • 10 million gallons of fuel reduced yearly
  • 100,000 metric tons CO2 emissions cut
  • 2-4 miles shorter routes per driver daily
  • 97% fleet deployment by 2021
Read case study →

Pfizer

Healthcare

The COVID-19 pandemic created an unprecedented urgent need for new antiviral treatments, as traditional drug discovery timelines span 10-15 years with success rates below 10%. Pfizer faced immense pressure to identify potent, oral inhibitors targeting the SARS-CoV-2 3CL protease (Mpro), a key viral enzyme, while ensuring safety and efficacy in humans. Structure-based drug design (SBDD) required analyzing complex protein structures and generating millions of potential molecules, but conventional computational methods were too slow, consuming vast resources and time. Challenges included limited structural data early in the pandemic, high failure risks in hit identification, and the need to run processes in parallel amid global uncertainty. Pfizer's teams had to overcome data scarcity, integrate disparate datasets, and scale simulations without compromising accuracy, all while traditional wet-lab validation lagged behind.

Lösung

Pfizer deployed AI-driven pipelines leveraging machine learning (ML) for SBDD, using models to predict protein-ligand interactions and generate novel molecules via generative AI. Tools analyzed cryo-EM and X-ray structures of the SARS-CoV-2 protease, enabling virtual screening of billions of compounds and de novo design optimized for binding affinity, pharmacokinetics, and synthesizability. By integrating supercomputing with ML algorithms, Pfizer streamlined hit-to-lead optimization, running parallel simulations that identified PF-07321332 (nirmatrelvir) as the lead candidate. This lightspeed approach combined ML with human expertise, reducing iterative cycles and accelerating from target validation to preclinical nomination.

Ergebnisse

  • Drug candidate nomination: 4 months vs. typical 2-5 years
  • Computational chemistry processes reduced: 80-90%
  • Drug discovery timeline cut: From years to 30 days for key phases
  • Clinical trial success rate boost: Up to 12% (vs. industry ~5-10%)
  • Virtual screening scale: Billions of compounds screened rapidly
  • Paxlovid efficacy: 89% reduction in hospitalization/death
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Connect Gemini to a Clean Product Feed and Behavioral Events

Before you can ask Gemini to suggest the “next best product”, it needs structured access to your catalog and relevant user signals. Work with your data/engineering teams to expose a normalized product feed (via API or scheduled exports) including IDs, categories, attributes, price, margin buckets, availability and descriptive text. In parallel, stream or batch key behavioral events: product views, add-to-cart, purchases, search queries, content views and email interactions.

Use an intermediary service or lightweight backend that can assemble a user snapshot on request: last N interactions, current session context, and eligible products. Gemini should receive a concise but information-rich payload, not raw logs. This approach keeps latency low and makes prompts predictable, which is critical when you build recommendation workflows that must respond in real time across channels.

Design a Reusable Next-Best-Product Prompt Template

Once the data is flowing, define a standard prompt template you can reuse across website, app and CRM. The aim is to make Gemini reason over the user context and the product pool, then return ranked recommendations with explanations that can later inform merchandising and experimentation.

System role:
You are a marketing AI that generates personalized product recommendations.
Optimize for:
- Highest probability of purchase in this session
- Respecting business rules (stock, exclusions, price range)
- Diversity across categories, but relevance first

Inputs:
- User profile and recent behavior:
{{user_context_json}}
- Candidate products (JSON array with id, name, price, margin_band, category, tags):
{{product_candidates_json}}
- Channel: {{channel}} (e.g. web_home, cart_page, email_postpurchase)

Task:
1. Select the top 4 products for this user in this channel.
2. Return JSON:
{
  "recommendations": [
    {"product_id": "...", "reason": "short rationale", "position": 1},
    ...
  ]
}
3. Do not invent product IDs that are not in the candidate list.

This pattern ensures your front end can directly consume Gemini’s output, while the reasoning (“reason” field) becomes a powerful signal for later analysis and creative optimization.

Generate Channel-Specific Creative Around Recommended Products

Gemini’s strength is not only picking products, but also generating personalized campaign content for each channel. After your next-best-product call, trigger a second prompt that asks Gemini to create headlines, snippets and CTAs that reference the selected items and the user’s context. This can power on-site copy, dynamic email content or ad creatives.

System role:
You are a performance marketing copywriter.
Goal: Create concise, personalized copy for product recommendations.

Inputs:
- User context summary: {{user_context_summary}}
- Selected products with names, key benefits and prices: {{selected_products_json}}
- Channel: {{channel}}

Task:
1. For each product, create a short headline (<40 chars) and body (<80 chars).
2. Tone: helpful, clear, no hard sell.
3. Return JSON with fields: product_id, headline, body, cta.

Connect this to your CMS, ESP or ad platform so that recommendation logic and creative personalization stay in sync. Over time, you can A/B test different prompt variants and tones to optimize engagement.

Implement Guardrails and Business Rules in a Pre-Filter Layer

To avoid surprises, build business logic outside of Gemini as a pre-filter and post-filter. Before calling Gemini, filter out out-of-stock items, restricted categories, low-margin products you never want to push, or SKUs conflicting with user attributes (e.g. already purchased, incompatible accessories). This ensures AI-driven recommendations always respect baseline commercial and legal constraints.

After Gemini returns its ranked list, validate the output: check IDs against the candidate set, ensure price ranges and categories meet your rules, and fall back to a safe default if the response is invalid. This layered approach keeps your recommendation system robust, particularly in early stages when you are still tuning prompts and data quality.

Integrate with Email and CRM Journeys for Lifecycle Personalization

Do not limit Gemini-powered recommendations to on-site blocks. Integrate the same next-best-product API into your email and CRM journeys so each triggered or batch campaign can personalize based on live context. For example, a post-purchase email can ask Gemini: “Given this order and browsing history, what are the top three relevant accessories within 30 days?” and then fetch copy for the chosen products.

On the ESP side, configure dynamic content blocks that call your recommendation service (which orchestrates the Gemini call) at send time or in pre-send batch jobs. Store product IDs and copy variants as personalization fields. Start with high-impact flows like welcome series, abandoned cart and replenishment, then extend to loyalty and win-back campaigns.

Track KPIs and Create Feedback Loops into Gemini Workflows

To improve over time, you need measurement tightly coupled to your Gemini workflows. Track KPIs at the block and session level: recommendation CTR, conversion rate after recommendation click, incremental revenue per session, and AOV uplift. Instrument separate tracking for AI-powered modules vs. legacy ones so you can directly compare performance.

Feed aggregate insights back into your system. For example, you might periodically summarise successful vs. unsuccessful recommendation patterns and use Gemini itself to analyze them: “Given these high-performing scenarios and these low-performing ones, what changes to candidate selection or ranking logic should we test?” This closes the loop and helps you iteratively refine prompts, candidate filtering and channel strategies.

With these tactics in place, marketing teams typically see realistic gains such as 5–15% uplift in recommendation CTR, 5–10% higher average order value on affected journeys, and increased relevance scores in customer feedback. The exact numbers depend on your baseline, but a structured Gemini implementation for recommendations almost always surfaces measurable revenue and engagement improvements within a few weeks of going live.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini adds a reasoning layer on top of your existing data and tooling. Instead of relying only on collaborative filtering or static rules, you can feed Gemini a user’s recent behavior, profile data and a set of eligible products, and ask it to select the next best products for that specific context.

This lets you combine signals that are hard to capture in traditional engines – such as intent from search queries, content consumed, channel context and campaign history – and use them to tailor recommendations and the surrounding copy. In practice, most teams use Gemini alongside existing recommenders at first (e.g. reranking or augmenting their output) before phasing out legacy rules where it makes sense.

You do not need an in-house research lab, but you do need a small cross-functional pod. Typically that includes one backend or data engineer to connect analytics and product feeds, one marketing or CRM lead to define use cases and KPIs, and optionally a data analyst to help with measurement.

From a technical perspective, the key tasks are exposing a clean product feed, structuring user context data, calling the Gemini API securely and integrating the outputs into your website, app or email templates. Reruption often works as the engineering and AI layer for clients, so internal teams can focus on commercial strategy and content rather than low-level implementation details.

For a focused use case like cart or post-purchase cross-sell, organisations can usually get a working prototype live within a few weeks, assuming data access is in place. With Reruption’s structured AI PoC approach, we aim to prove technical feasibility and show first performance metrics in a matter of days, then run an initial A/B test over 2–4 weeks.

Meaningful business results – such as uplift in recommendation CTR, AOV or attach rate of accessories – often become visible during that first test window. Full rollout across additional journeys and channels typically happens over subsequent sprints, depending on your internal release cycles and governance.

The direct cost components are Gemini API usage, any additional infrastructure (often modest if you use existing cloud resources), and implementation effort. For many marketing teams, the main investment is the initial integration work, not ongoing runtime cost.

In terms of ROI, even small improvements in revenue per visitor compound quickly. For example, a 5–10% uplift in AOV or conversion rate on journeys influenced by recommendations can translate into significant incremental revenue at scale. Because we validate performance through controlled experiments, you can quantify uplift before committing to a broader rollout. Reruption’s PoC format at 9.900€ is specifically designed to help you answer the ROI question with real data, not slides.

Reruption works as a Co-Preneur inside your organisation: instead of delivering slideware, we embed with your team to ship a working solution. Our AI PoC offering (9.900€) is a structured way to test Gemini for your specific recommendation use case. We define the scope with you, assess data and architecture, build a prototype that calls the Gemini API on real user and product data, and measure performance against your current baseline.

If the PoC meets your thresholds, we help you turn it into a production-ready capability: refining prompts, hardening the integration, addressing security and compliance, and enabling your marketing and CRM teams to use the system day to day. Throughout, we apply our Co-Preneur approach – taking entrepreneurial ownership of the outcome and working inside your P&L rather than on the sidelines.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media