The Challenge: Late Detection of Liquidity Gaps

In many finance and treasury departments, liquidity risk is still managed with static spreadsheets, manual updates, and fragmented views of cash. Bank balances, open items, FX positions and short-term forecasts often sit in different systems, refreshed at different times. As a result, teams spot liquidity gaps only when they hit the bank account — not when they are still manageable.

Traditional forecasting approaches were built for stable environments and slower change. Treasury analysts manually export data from ERP systems, adjust assumptions in Excel, and email updated files across the organisation. By the time these cash forecasts are consolidated, reality has already moved on. Payment behaviour, seasonality patterns, and market signals are rarely integrated systematically. This lag makes it almost impossible to detect emerging shortfalls early, especially in volatile markets or multi-entity setups.

The business impact is real and measurable. Late detection of liquidity gaps forces companies into emergency measures: expensive short-term credit lines, suboptimal drawdowns on facilities, rushed asset sales, and last-minute negotiations with banks. Higher interest costs, unnecessary risk buffers and the constant threat of covenant breaches translate directly into reduced margins and lost strategic flexibility. Competitors who manage liquidity proactively can negotiate better terms, deploy capital more confidently, and weather shocks with less disruption.

Yet this challenge is solvable. Modern AI for finance, especially when powered by tools like Gemini on Google Cloud, can continuously ingest transaction streams, bank balances and external data to predict short-term liquidity needs with far greater precision. At Reruption, we’ve seen how turning static cash forecasts into live, model-driven views changes how CFOs and treasurers steer the business. In the rest of this page, you’ll find practical guidance on how to use Gemini to detect liquidity gaps early — and how to de-risk your journey from spreadsheet chaos to AI-enabled liquidity control.

Need a sparring partner for this challenge?

Let's have a no-obligation chat and brainstorm together.

Innovators at these companies trust us:

Our Assessment

A strategic assessment of the challenge and high-level tips how to tackle it.

From Reruption’s perspective, the key to solving late detection of liquidity gaps is not another spreadsheet template, but an AI-first liquidity forecasting engine built on real transaction data. With Gemini on Google Cloud, we can combine BigQuery, banking APIs and market data into a single analytical layer, then use Vertex AI models to predict near-term cash positions and let Gemini explain and surface the risks to finance teams in natural language.

Think in Terms of a Dynamic Liquidity Radar, Not a Better Spreadsheet

The strategic shift is to move from static, point-in-time cash forecasts to a continuously updated liquidity radar. Instead of debating which Excel version is “final”, you design a system where transaction streams, bank balances and forecast drivers flow into BigQuery in near real time. Gemini then becomes the interface that helps finance teams query, interpret and explain the projected gaps.

This mindset change matters because it affects process design and governance. Rather than building yet another template, you design event-driven data flows and rules: every large invoice, collection, or FX deal updates your risk view automatically. Gemini is then used strategically to summarise risks by entity, currency or bank, and to highlight anomalies and early warning signals that a human analyst would likely miss in time.

Start with Short-Term Horizons and High-Impact Cash Flows

When deploying AI for liquidity forecasting, it is tempting to aim for a perfect, end-to-end 12‑month cash flow model from day one. In practice, impact and adoption come faster if you start with a focused scope: short-term horizons (7–30 days) and the few cash flow categories that drive most variability, such as customer payments, supplier runs and payroll.

Strategically, this lets you validate that Gemini-backed models can detect meaningful liquidity gaps early enough to change funding decisions. You prove value in one or two entities or regions, then extend the coverage. This phased approach also reduces change management risk, because treasury teams experience tangible benefits (fewer surprises, better conversations with banks) without having to overhaul their entire forecasting framework at once.

Align Treasury, Controlling and IT Around a Single Data Model

AI initiatives around liquidity risk management fail less often because of models and more because of organisational misalignment. Treasury, controlling and IT frequently work with different definitions of “cash”, “liquidity buffer” or “available credit facilities”. Before you let Gemini reason over your data, you need a shared semantic layer and governance: what are the authoritative sources, who owns which data, and how often is it updated?

Strategically, this means treating your liquidity data model as a product. Design it collaboratively: treasury defines the risk views they need; controlling provides planning inputs and scenario structures; IT ensures that ERP, TMS and bank interfaces feed BigQuery reliably. Gemini can then sit on top of this shared layer to surface insights that everyone interprets in the same way, reducing friction and endless reconciliation discussions.

Mitigate Model Risk with Clear Guardrails and Human-in-the-Loop

Using AI models for liquidity planning introduces model risk: wrong assumptions, data quality issues, or regime changes can lead to misleading forecasts. Strategically, you need explicit guardrails. Define acceptable error bands, thresholds for alerts, and escalation paths. Gemini should not “decide” liquidity actions; it should augment treasury judgement with early warnings, explanations and what-if analyses.

Set up review cadences where treasury analysts regularly challenge the projections: which cash flows were mispredicted, where did payment behaviour shift, which leading indicators should be added? Gemini can even support this by summarising model performance and explaining key drivers, but the final accountability for liquidity risk decisions remains with humans.

Prepare Your Team to Work with AI, Not Against It

Even the best Gemini-based liquidity solution will fail if treasury and finance teams don’t trust or understand it. Strategically, you need to invest in enablement: explain how data flows into BigQuery, what the AI models do, and how Gemini presents results. Show concrete examples where the system flagged a shortfall earlier than the old process would have.

Position AI as a way to remove firefighting, not jobs. Analysts move from manually stitching spreadsheets together to interpreting scenarios, negotiating better funding terms, and advising the business. With this framing, your team becomes a co-designer of the AI liquidity forecasting capability instead of a passive end user, which is exactly the way we build solutions with clients at Reruption.

Using Gemini on Google Cloud to tackle late detection of liquidity gaps is ultimately about building a dynamic, shared view of cash risk and letting AI surface what matters early enough to act. With the right data model, guardrails and team enablement, you can turn liquidity management from reactive crisis handling into proactive steering. Reruption’s combination of AI engineering depth and hands-on, Co-Preneur approach means we don’t just propose models — we build and embed AI-driven liquidity forecasting that your treasury team will actually use. If you want to explore what this could look like in your environment, we’re ready to work with you on a concrete, low-risk proof of concept.

Need help implementing these ideas?

Feel free to reach out to us with no obligation.

Real-World Case Studies

From EdTech to Banking: Learn how companies successfully use Gemini.

Duolingo

EdTech

Duolingo, a leader in gamified language learning, faced key limitations in providing real-world conversational practice and in-depth feedback. While its bite-sized lessons built vocabulary and basics effectively, users craved immersive dialogues simulating everyday scenarios, which static exercises couldn't deliver . This gap hindered progression to fluency, as learners lacked opportunities for free-form speaking and nuanced grammar explanations without expensive human tutors. Additionally, content creation was a bottleneck. Human experts manually crafted lessons, slowing the rollout of new courses and languages amid rapid user growth. Scaling personalized experiences across 40+ languages demanded innovation to maintain engagement without proportional resource increases . These challenges risked user churn and limited monetization in a competitive EdTech market.

Lösung

Duolingo launched Duolingo Max in March 2023, a premium subscription powered by GPT-4, introducing Roleplay for dynamic conversations and Explain My Answer for contextual feedback . Roleplay simulates real-life interactions like ordering coffee or planning vacations with AI characters, adapting in real-time to user inputs. Explain My Answer provides detailed breakdowns of correct/incorrect responses, enhancing comprehension. Complementing this, Duolingo's Birdbrain LLM (fine-tuned on proprietary data) automates lesson generation, allowing experts to create content 10x faster . This hybrid human-AI approach ensured quality while scaling rapidly, integrated seamlessly into the app for all skill levels .

Ergebnisse

  • DAU Growth: +59% YoY to 34.1M (Q2 2024)
  • DAU Growth: +54% YoY to 31.4M (Q1 2024)
  • Revenue Growth: +41% YoY to $178.3M (Q2 2024)
  • Adjusted EBITDA Margin: 27.0% (Q2 2024)
  • Lesson Creation Speed: 10x faster with AI
  • User Self-Efficacy: Significant increase post-AI use (2025 study)
Read case study →

Insilico Medicine

Biotech

The drug discovery process traditionally spans 10-15 years and costs upwards of $2-3 billion per approved drug, with over 90% failure rate in clinical trials due to poor efficacy, toxicity, or ADMET issues. In idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), a fatal lung disease with limited treatments like pirfenidone and nintedanib, the need for novel therapies is urgent, but identifying viable targets and designing effective small molecules remains arduous, relying on slow high-throughput screening of existing libraries. Key challenges include target identification amid vast biological data, de novo molecule generation beyond screened compounds, and predictive modeling of properties to reduce wet-lab failures. Insilico faced skepticism on AI's ability to deliver clinically viable candidates, regulatory hurdles for AI-discovered drugs, and integration of AI with experimental validation.

Lösung

Insilico deployed its end-to-end Pharma.AI platform, integrating generative AI and deep learning for accelerated discovery. PandaOmics used multimodal deep learning on omics data to nominate novel targets like TNIK kinase for IPF, prioritizing based on disease relevance and druggability. Chemistry42 employed generative models (GANs, reinforcement learning) to design de novo molecules, generating and optimizing millions of novel structures with desired properties, while InClinico predicted preclinical outcomes. This AI-driven pipeline overcame traditional limitations by virtual screening vast chemical spaces and iterating designs rapidly. Validation through hybrid AI-wet lab approaches ensured robust candidates like ISM001-055 (Rentosertib).

Ergebnisse

  • Time from project start to Phase I: 30 months (vs. 5+ years traditional)
  • Time to IND filing: 21 months
  • First generative AI drug to enter Phase II human trials (2023)
  • Generated/optimized millions of novel molecules de novo
  • Preclinical success: Potent TNIK inhibition, efficacy in IPF models
  • USAN naming for Rentosertib: March 2025, Phase II ongoing
Read case study →

PepsiCo (Frito-Lay)

Food Manufacturing

In the fast-paced food manufacturing industry, PepsiCo's Frito-Lay division grappled with unplanned machinery downtime that disrupted high-volume production lines for snacks like Lay's and Doritos. These lines operate 24/7, where even brief failures could cost thousands of dollars per hour in lost capacity—industry estimates peg average downtime at $260,000 per hour in manufacturing . Perishable ingredients and just-in-time supply chains amplified losses, leading to high maintenance costs from reactive repairs, which are 3-5x more expensive than planned ones . Frito-Lay plants faced frequent issues with critical equipment like compressors, conveyors, and fryers, where micro-stops and major breakdowns eroded overall equipment effectiveness (OEE). Worker fatigue from extended shifts compounded risks, as noted in reports of grueling 84-hour weeks, indirectly stressing machines further . Without predictive insights, maintenance teams relied on schedules or breakdowns, resulting in lost production capacity and inability to meet consumer demand spikes.

Lösung

PepsiCo deployed machine learning predictive maintenance across Frito-Lay factories, leveraging sensor data from IoT devices on equipment to forecast failures days or weeks ahead. Models analyzed vibration, temperature, pressure, and usage patterns using algorithms like random forests and deep learning for time-series forecasting . Partnering with cloud platforms like Microsoft Azure Machine Learning and AWS, PepsiCo built scalable systems integrating real-time data streams for just-in-time maintenance alerts. This shifted from reactive to proactive strategies, optimizing schedules during low-production windows and minimizing disruptions . Implementation involved pilot testing in select plants before full rollout, overcoming data silos through advanced analytics .

Ergebnisse

  • 4,000 extra production hours gained annually
  • 50% reduction in unplanned downtime
  • 30% decrease in maintenance costs
  • 95% accuracy in failure predictions
  • 20% increase in OEE (Overall Equipment Effectiveness)
  • $5M+ annual savings from optimized repairs
Read case study →

Ooredoo (Qatar)

Telecommunications

Ooredoo Qatar, Qatar's leading telecom operator, grappled with the inefficiencies of manual Radio Access Network (RAN) optimization and troubleshooting. As 5G rollout accelerated, traditional methods proved time-consuming and unscalable , struggling to handle surging data demands, ensure seamless connectivity, and maintain high-quality user experiences amid complex network dynamics . Performance issues like dropped calls, variable data speeds, and suboptimal resource allocation required constant human intervention, driving up operating expenses (OpEx) and delaying resolutions. With Qatar's National Digital Transformation agenda pushing for advanced 5G capabilities, Ooredoo needed a proactive, intelligent approach to RAN management without compromising network reliability .

Lösung

Ooredoo partnered with Ericsson to deploy cloud-native Ericsson Cognitive Software on Microsoft Azure, featuring a digital twin of the RAN combined with deep reinforcement learning (DRL) for AI-driven optimization . This solution creates a virtual network replica to simulate scenarios, analyze vast RAN data in real-time, and generate proactive tuning recommendations . The Ericsson Performance Optimizers suite was trialed in 2022, evolving into full deployment by 2023, enabling automated issue resolution and performance enhancements while integrating seamlessly with Ooredoo's 5G infrastructure . Recent expansions include energy-saving PoCs, further leveraging AI for sustainable operations .

Ergebnisse

  • 15% reduction in radio power consumption (Energy Saver PoC)
  • Proactive RAN optimization reducing troubleshooting time
  • Maintained high user experience during power savings
  • Reduced operating expenses via automated resolutions
  • Enhanced 5G subscriber experience with seamless connectivity
  • 10% spectral efficiency gains (Ericsson AI RAN benchmarks)
Read case study →

Maersk

Shipping

In the demanding world of maritime logistics, Maersk, the world's largest container shipping company, faced significant challenges from unexpected ship engine failures. These failures, often due to wear on critical components like two-stroke diesel engines under constant high-load operations, led to costly delays, emergency repairs, and multimillion-dollar losses in downtime. With a fleet of over 700 vessels traversing global routes, even a single failure could disrupt supply chains, increase fuel inefficiency, and elevate emissions . Suboptimal ship operations compounded the issue. Traditional fixed-speed routing ignored real-time factors like weather, currents, and engine health, resulting in excessive fuel consumption—which accounts for up to 50% of operating costs—and higher CO2 emissions. Delays from breakdowns averaged days per incident, amplifying logistical bottlenecks in an industry where reliability is paramount .

Lösung

Maersk tackled these issues with machine learning (ML) for predictive maintenance and optimization. By analyzing vast datasets from engine sensors, AIS (Automatic Identification System), and meteorological data, ML models predict failures days or weeks in advance, enabling proactive interventions. This integrates with route and speed optimization algorithms that dynamically adjust voyages for fuel efficiency . Implementation involved partnering with tech leaders like Wärtsilä for fleet solutions and internal digital transformation, using MLOps for scalable deployment across the fleet. AI dashboards provide real-time insights to crews and shore teams, shifting from reactive to predictive operations .

Ergebnisse

  • Fuel consumption reduced by 5-10% through AI route optimization
  • Unplanned engine downtime cut by 20-30%
  • Maintenance costs lowered by 15-25%
  • Operational efficiency improved by 10-15%
  • CO2 emissions decreased by up to 8%
  • Predictive accuracy for failures: 85-95%
Read case study →

Best Practices

Successful implementations follow proven patterns. Have a look at our tactical advice to get started.

Connect Your ERP, TMS and Bank Feeds into BigQuery as a Single Source of Truth

The first tactical step is to centralise all relevant liquidity data in BigQuery. Connect your ERP (open receivables, payables, purchase orders), TMS (debt schedules, FX positions, facilities) and bank APIs (balances, intraday movements) into a unified schema. Use scheduled or streaming pipelines so that new transactions are reflected quickly.

Practically, you’ll define a few core tables: transactions (amount, currency, value date, counterparty), balances (per account, per bank, per day), and limits (facilities, covenants, internal limits). Once this is in place, Gemini can query BigQuery directly via Vertex AI integrations, giving treasury a live view rather than static downloads.

Build a Short-Term Liquidity Forecasting Model on Vertex AI

Once data is centralised, configure a short-term cash flow forecasting model in Vertex AI. Start by predicting daily net cash position for the next 7–30 days per entity or currency. Use historical payment patterns, seasonality, DSO/DPO behaviour and known events (payroll runs, tax payments) as features. Vertex AI can host either a custom model or an AutoML model based on your data.

Define clear evaluation metrics: mean absolute error by horizon, hit rate for detecting gaps above a certain threshold, and bias by entity or currency. Expose model outputs back into BigQuery as a forecast_liquidity table with projected positions and confidence bands that Gemini can explain and visualise.

Use Gemini to Create Natural-Language Liquidity Dashboards and Alerts

With forecasts available, set up Gemini to act as a liquidity assistant over your BigQuery data. Finance users should be able to ask: “What are the largest projected liquidity gaps in the next 14 days by entity?” or “Which customers drive most of the uncertainty in next week’s cash inflows?” and receive clear answers and charts.

Here is an example prompt pattern you can embed into a finance portal or use via Gemini’s interface:

System role:
You are a treasury and liquidity risk assistant. You analyse BigQuery tables
'balances', 'transactions', 'forecast_liquidity' and 'limits'.

User prompt:
Using the forecast_liquidity table, identify any days in the next 21 days
where projected cash position falls below defined limits for any entity.
For each case:
- Quantify the gap (in absolute and % of limit)
- Explain key drivers (top 10 expected inflows and outflows)
- Suggest 2–3 mitigation options (e.g. draw facility X, delay payment group Y).
Present the result as a short executive summary plus a detailed table.

This setup lets non-technical treasury staff interact with complex liquidity forecasts in plain language while still being anchored in precise data.

Configure Threshold-Based Alerts and Escalations for Projected Gaps

Forecasts are only useful if they trigger action. Implement threshold-based alerts where BigQuery jobs check for projected liquidity shortfalls (e.g. forecasted position < 80% of limit within the next 10 days) and push events to a messaging system (email, Slack, Teams). Let Gemini enrich these alerts with context so that recipients understand the situation at a glance.

Example alert enrichment prompt:

System role:
You generate concise liquidity risk alerts for treasury managers.

User prompt:
We detected a projected liquidity gap of EUR 12m on <DATE> for Entity A,
which breaches internal limits by 15%. Using the forecast_liquidity and
transactions tables, write a 200-word alert that:
- Summarises the situation
- Lists the main inflows/outflows causing the gap
- Suggests 2 immediate mitigation scenarios
Use clear, non-technical language.

This combination of programmatic thresholds and Gemini-generated explanations ensures that liquidity risk alerts are timely and actionable, not just another noisy notification.

Embed Scenario and What-If Analysis into Treasury Workflows

To move beyond baseline forecasts, configure scenario analysis directly in your treasury workflows. For example, let users simulate a 10-day delay in top-50 customer payments, an unplanned supplier prepayment, or changes in FX rates. Implement these scenarios as parameterised queries or temporary tables in BigQuery and let Gemini generate the narrative comparison.

Example scenario prompt:

System role:
You help treasury model liquidity scenarios.

User prompt:
Compare our baseline forecast_liquidity with a scenario where:
- Top 30 customers pay 7 days later than usual
- We prepay EUR 5m to Supplier Group Z on <DATE>
Show the impact on daily net liquidity and limit breaches for the next
30 days, and describe the main differences in a CFO-ready summary.

By embedding this into your daily routine, treasury turns Gemini into a tactical tool for liquidity stress testing, not just a reporting layer.

Implement Continuous Backtesting and Model Performance Reviews

To keep trust high, you need a simple but robust backtesting process. Create a job that compares forecasted positions with actuals once value dates are known, store errors in a forecast_performance table and let Gemini summarise performance trends monthly for treasury and finance leadership.

Example evaluation prompt:

System role:
You are a model performance analyst for liquidity forecasts.

User prompt:
Using the forecast_performance table, analyse the last 90 days of
forecasts by horizon (1–7 days, 8–14 days, 15–30 days) and by entity.
Highlight where error rates are highest, potential root causes
(e.g. specific customer segments, countries, or currencies), and
recommend 3 concrete data or model improvements.

This practice keeps your AI liquidity forecasting solution honest and continuously improving, rather than a black box that slowly drifts away from reality.

Implemented step by step, these best practices typically enable finance teams to reduce surprise liquidity gaps by 30–50%, cut time spent on manual cash forecast consolidation by 40% or more, and negotiate funding with better lead time. Exact metrics depend on your data quality and existing processes, but the pattern is consistent: once Gemini and Google Cloud provide a live, explainable view of liquidity risk, emergency funding and last-minute firefighting become the exception instead of the rule.

Need implementation expertise now?

Let's talk about your ideas!

Frequently Asked Questions

Gemini connects to your BigQuery environment, where ERP, TMS and bank data are consolidated. Instead of waiting for monthly or weekly spreadsheet updates, it can analyse near real-time transaction streams, bank balances and forecast models hosted on Vertex AI.

Practically, this means Gemini can continuously scan projected cash positions, compare them against limits and covenants, and surface upcoming liquidity gaps in natural language reports and alerts. It doesn’t replace your treasury expertise, but it gives you a much faster, data-driven view so you spot issues days or weeks before they show up on the bank statement.

You need three core capabilities: access to your financial data, basic data engineering on Google Cloud, and a treasury team willing to collaborate. On the technical side, a cloud or data engineer connects ERP/TMS/bank systems to BigQuery and helps configure a Vertex AI model. On the business side, treasury defines forecasting rules, limits and reporting needs so Gemini can present results in a useful way.

Reruption typically works with an internal finance lead, one IT/data contact, and a small treasury user group. You don’t need a large AI team; with our support, most organisations can get a first working prototype with Gemini up and running without hiring additional full-time specialists.

Timelines depend on data availability and complexity, but many companies can see first tangible results within a few weeks. A focused proof of concept that covers 1–2 entities and a 30‑day forecast horizon is typically achievable in 4–6 weeks from kick-off, assuming we can access the necessary data sources.

In this first phase, you already get live liquidity forecasts, early warning alerts for projected gaps, and Gemini-generated explanations. Subsequent phases (more entities, currencies, scenarios) are incremental, building on the same architecture. Full rollout might take a few months, but value does not depend on waiting for the final state; it comes from starting small and expanding.

The main ROI drivers are reduced emergency funding costs, fewer covenant breaches or near-breaches, and time saved on manual forecasting. For many organisations, even a small reduction in short-notice credit utilisation or penalty interest can offset the cloud and implementation costs within months.

On top of direct savings, there is strategic value: better visibility over cash and liquidity risk improves negotiating power with banks, supports more confident investment decisions, and reduces management’s time spent on crisis meetings. We usually help clients build a simple business case that quantifies interest savings, reduced buffer capital and productivity gains to clearly justify the investment in Gemini and Google Cloud.

Reruption combines deep AI engineering with a Co-Preneur approach: we work inside your organisation like co-founders, not just advisors. Our AI PoC offering (9,900€) is designed to quickly prove whether Gemini-based liquidity forecasting works for your specific data and systems. Within a short timeframe, we define the use case, build a working prototype on Google Cloud, evaluate performance and provide a concrete production plan.

After the PoC, we can support you in hardening the solution, integrating ERP/TMS and bank feeds, setting up Vertex AI models, and designing Gemini-powered dashboards and workflows for your treasury team. Throughout, we focus on shipping real, secure solutions that reduce your liquidity risk instead of generating slides — so your finance department can move from reacting to cash surprises to proactively steering liquidity.

Contact Us!

0/10 min.

Contact Directly

Your Contact

Philipp M. W. Hoffmann

Founder & Partner

Address

Reruption GmbH

Falkertstraße 2

70176 Stuttgart

Social Media